521 Comments

For all the Pollyannas who have been posting that we have to be nicer to the other side, I post the 43 GOP controlled legislatures currently working to undermine if not destroy the democracy that allegedly underpins this constitutional democratic republic. Anyone want to try "nice talk" with those people? In the current situation, those people are The Enemy. They have delcared war on the country, whether anyone here likes it or not. Nice talk and longings for bipartisanship don't work with wolverines.

Expand full comment

TC, you are sometimes a bit blunt, but I always respect your opinion, and mostly agree with you. Today, I TOTALLY agree with you. I don't want to see the Democratic Party turn into a more liberal version of the Republican Party, but for now, I think the big stick needs to come out. I seriously cannot wrap my brain around how we got to another phase in our history where the "leaders" in our states are trying to take us backward into a time where prejudice is the norm and if you aren't white, you shouldn't have the same rights. Back to pretending oil will last forever and alternative energy isn't needed; a time where climate change is completely ignored, and so are killer viruses. And back to a time where lies flow like honey out of the mouths of demagogues that we have allowed to take power because it is easier to believe their BS than it is to fight for equality and the rights of all people. I really really don't want to go back there again. And I don't want my grandchildren to grow up in that poison. I agree, nice talk and longing for bipartisanship just feeds their rhetoric and the hatred that comes out of it. We can and must do better, and we are seriously running out of time.

Expand full comment

"Sometimes?" Lol.

Expand full comment

Nice Syd you got a smile out of me 😉

Expand full comment

I do not think they are trying to take us backwards in time. I think this country has never really moved on from the Civil War division. People hate “other.” It is present and fully thriving in this country.

Expand full comment

Sadly, I have to agree. Here I though all naive 20-something that I was back then, that the fights we won back in the 60s were permanent.

Expand full comment

Agreed‼️ We are all one.

Expand full comment

“Today, I TOTALLY agree with you.”

Expand full comment

Republican leadership has proved themselves unworthy of careful consideration or bipartisan negotiation. It’s time for Democrats to lead. Republicans can either follow or get out of the way. What we can no longer allow is their obstruction. America awaits our action; end the filibuster and get on with governing.

Expand full comment

We also need to let our Democratic Senators and Representatives know that bipartisanship is not a high priority for us. I've written to mine (Murray, Cantwell, Larsen) at least twice now that I don't care about bipartisanship at this point; I do care about getting things done.

Expand full comment

T: Yesterday’s Letter recounted the March to Selma. The use of a most powerful force of nonviolence. Sit-ins, disruption of economic activity, voter registration drives, etc - all set against the threats of ropes and nooses, dogs and kidnappings ...

These efforts were based on love and ‘just anger’. There was no attempt to falsely carry on "nice talk”. This movement begins within one’s heart. A moral strength lived within people who acted so courageously.

So I felt a need to clarify, for myself in this spirit of the March to Selma, that I see no need to disparage and insult another person or a group of people on this board, as I had done. I agree with you about everything you have stated about the actions of the GOP. But please do not mistake my intention to be less significant than another in our struggle.

I feel it does me, imho - no good to waste my mental energy on creating within me a life of fear, hatred and an obsession of The Enemy. Ironically, the pastor of the home church for King, Rev Raphael Warnock, is now a US Senator from Georgia! Senator Warnock has the moral force with him!

Fittingly, the man who has stayed above the political infighting, Joe Biden, now sees soaring approval ratings, as he simply makes the moral case for the survival of our democracy. Biden will be the guide for our collective march, arm-in-arm, toward a more just society. Appropriately, Biden takes the moral high ground, by starting, “I am the president for all Americans, whether you voted for me or not. I will be your president”

What a breath of clear, fresh air, after too many years of angst, hatred and dissonance! Biden’s approval proves that a kind heart gathers unknown friends and allies.

Expand full comment

I agree that we must not become obsessed with the opposition. However, I also agree with TC's belief that the current majority in the Republican party is dangerous to this nation and its citizens - all of them, even if they haven't realized it yet. I am thrilled with President Biden, and his remaining above the fray is political genius, as well as a sign of his decency and honor. However, Biden always has a Plan B in case his staying above the fray doesn't work. I believe it translates to walking softly, but carrying a big stick.

Expand full comment

Well, if we are going to compare Biden first to FDR, like everybody in the news is doing now, and then to Teddy Roosevelt, he’s going to have a hell of a legacy.

That’s funny, but when I was writing that Biden is probably the best president of my lifetime, I had to consider JFK and Eisenhower. I was too young to know them or what they were doing and I haven’t researched them: I’m not a historian. Trust me, six weeks ago I had no idea that I would be praising Biden like this. I am not raving about him, I don’t feel that level of adoration in me. I am just watching these words come out, in astonishment, because I really didn’t have any respect for him.

Expand full comment

Biden's delivery lacks the charisma of Roosevelt (FDR) because of his speech struggles, and Kennedy could have been a movie star with his looks and stage presence (and beautiful, patrician Jackie), but more and more I believe that Biden has the chops. I recall Eisenhower's "I like Ike" slogan, but was too young to have any idea whether he was competent. We might be speaking too soon, considering the short time he's been in office, and with so much damage control ahead, but I believe the potential for greatness is there. He has certainly delivered amazingly these last 48 days - enough so that we're beginning to see many in the GOP scrambling to readjust their images, if that's possible. They see the threat.

Expand full comment

You could be a journalist. I think you’re talking for upwards of 100 million people in this country alone. You’re probably talking for 80 or 90% of this forum.

Expand full comment

Wow, now that's flattery! At my age, and with no training in journalism, I think you're being way too nice, but I am flattered. When Geoff Duncan, our Lt. Governor, boycotted the newest voter suppression legislation in Georgia, I had an aha moment. He sees landmines, and is wanting to have broader appeal, as has Romney. They're betting on rewards if they can manage to lose the Trumpstink. I'm guessing that the entire world is grateful, and a bit surprised at Biden's performance - no Sleepy Joe visible.

Expand full comment

You never heard me say be nicer to the other side, that's for damned sure.

Expand full comment

I’ve posted here several times in the past that we need to listen to the other side, we need to understand them, and we need to not underestimate them. I am with you, Daria - I have never said be nice to them. Know thine enemy. If you don’t know / understand them you can’t fight or defend against them.

Expand full comment

Daria, you surprise me.

And delight me.

Expand full comment

Ha! Thanks, Roland!. Why do I surprise you?

I have a good deal of respect for your comments and can identify with much of your personal journey. Most of my family was and is liberal, though my maternal grandparents were as conservative and bigoted as the day is long. Their very narrow opinions made for a lot of friction in my youth including me letting them know how objectionable they were socially and morally. I'm afraid I lacked tact and grace more than I do now and by the time I was 20 had damaged my relationship with them beyond repair. When my grandfather died in 1974 we were on very bitter terms. My relationship with my grandmother improved a great deal but still, by the time she died in the early aughts, there were huge gaps in our relationship because of our personal beliefs. Now, I am constantly at loggerheads with my in-laws. They are wealthy, well educated and viciously Republican. If there has been a silver lining in Covid it's been our inability, (and unwillingness), to travel freely thus reducing my face to face exposure to their ever growing hate. They are in their 80s and 90s and will never change their points of view. All this despite the fact they have a Black granddaughter. They are unwilling to acknowledge how potentially damaging their beliefs are to her future as an American. She is eight. There will come a time, though, if they live long enough, where their bigotry and racism will become more apparent and impactful to her personally. I hope it never goes that far.

Expand full comment

“Why do I surprise you?” Thank you for your transparency about yourself. That honesty answers the question. I didn’t have really good words for how to describe your post: sharp, biting, incisive. You just have a wickedly good insight into the whole Republican-Party-Kissing- Trump’s-Ass thing that just happened. Super nice insight.

Your tale about your in-laws: my dad is Republican conservative wealthy and downright stupid. I’m trying to decide what is harder, well-educated bigoted conservative in-laws or Dummkopf conservative bigoted father. The one constant is that they all seem to be rockheads. A jackhammer wouldn’t even do the trick of cracking them.

Expand full comment

Ah, well, thanks. I appreciate that. I honestly believe wealthy, well educated bigots inflict a lot more harm in both the short and long run. They have the money to influence and frequently the ability to craft appealing rhetoric that sounds both logical and socially appropriate. They can justify murder if they have a mind to.

A lot of factors have brought me to where I am today. A lot about my childhood and teenage years did not strike me as unusual at the time. The realization that most people didn't have a 5 day a week maid or places to spend the summer just didn't hit home while I was "living in it". I look back on what was normal for my family at and am stunned by how fortunate we were, how much we took for granted. How many assumptions I made. The first huge eye opener was in the summer between my Junior and Senior years. I participated in a summer theater program at Montgomery Blair High School in Silver Spring, MD. I became friends with a Black girl from DC during that summer. One day, she didn't come back to the theater from the restroom. I went to find her because we were reading scenes and we're up next. I found her in the bathroom beaten up, with a wet head, full of bubble gum. Her head had been dunked in the toilet. Several of Montgomery County's finest white girls were responsible. As horrified and angry as I was I cannot begin to understand the pain that young woman felt. I cannot imagine living with that experience embedded in my brain for the rest of my life. Of course, she never came back. And, of course, it didn't make the Post or the Star, because events like that were kept quiet and brushed under the rug. I'd love to tell you that that story is a figment of my imagination, but it's not. I will tell you that it was a huge epiphany for me. Had I seen racism before that day? Yes. Had I ever encountered that level of violence on a personal level before that incident? No. That one day forced me to understand racism viscerally, not just intellectually. It forced me to reevaluate everyone and everything around me. And speak up.

Expand full comment

It's good to share this harrowing story, Daria. Hopefully she went past the trauma to become a fierce activist for civil rights.

Expand full comment

Daria, I had a little time to read comments this evening. Your story, stopped me from going on. Seeing the attack on your friend appears to be embedded in you. I wasn't a witness as you were, but the ugliness, disrespect and condescension that I saw as a child impressed me to know more. My antipathy to racism seems to be brain wired. Thank you, Daria, for sharing your experience.

Expand full comment

Daria this is just brilliant. I have to include lynching and vicious violence in my screeds about the Republican Party being the bastion of the old Confederacy. I have to mention summary killings of Native Americans, by U.S. Cavalry, by settlers, by Spaniards and Texans and Californians and . . . . . . . Whites-first, racism, is not just genteel policy arguments on HCR and in the halls of Congress and state legislatures. Racism is DANGEROUS. Racism is GENOCIDAL. Racism, sexism, gay-ism, kills people. These are not polite conversation. When TC talks about “they pull out a knife, you pull out a gun,” these are not empty metaphors.

TC, easily the best post of the day and possibly your best work here on HCR. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

Expand full comment

The last time I saw my grandmother in 1987 she was in her 80s and in a nursing home in Mississippi. I didn’t tell her that I had married a “nigra” woman & don’t know if anyone else in the family let her in on this ‘secret.’ I was her first grandson and sort of favorite. What would be the point? She and her generation were leaving.

Expand full comment

I get that.

Expand full comment

Hey, I don’t have a problem with anyone nice-talking the enemy. And then while someone is nice-talking them, hit them with the

effing sledgehammer. Pass SB1, eliminate gerrymandering and the other bogus crap, and relegate those people to permanent minority status. All the while people can sweet talk them. Who cares about talk.

Expand full comment

Roland, Lynn, there is a danger in all this for the country's defenders: you're dealing with deluders and the deluded. And... this remark of Karl Popper's has become like a jack-in-the-box in my mind:

"To attack a man for talking nonsense is like finding your mortal enemy drowning in a swamp and jumping in after him with a knife."

Someone mentioned the need for thigh boots when wading into this swamp.

Expand full comment

Lynell Abbott3 min ago

Hey, Peter. Not sure if you are talking to me here (some people call me Lynn) but just wanted to clarify that my comment went more to correcting the source of the line TC used re pulling a gun over a knife. It wasn't from the movie Raiders, but the movie The Untouchables.

This got me to thinking, since TC is pretty accurate in his comments. So I did a search and came up with this from SNOPES:

"As it turned out, the comment was indeed made by then-Senator Obama at a fundraising event in the City of Brotherly Love, and it was not ignored by mainstream media outlets at the time. The New York Times, reported on 14 June 2008 that:

"Senator Barack Obama was fund-raising in Philadelphia. But he was talking about 'the Chicago way.'

"Channeling the mob drama, 'The Untouchables,' Mr. Obama said in reference to the general election rumble with the Republicans: 'If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.'”

Just FYI: Being a fan of living in a civilized society, I am not invested in the use of either a knife or a gun to make things "right." But I do enjoy the fantasy of a good movie where all kinds of laws are broken in the pursuit of justice. Just sayin'.

Expand full comment

"Mr Ness, I do not approve of your methods!"

"Well, you're not from Chicago."

Expand full comment

No, Lynell, I seem to have had an attack of the gremlins and don't know where "Lynn" came from. I was responding to Roland and (I guess) Diane Love.

I'd noticed the talk of guns and knives, but the quote from Karl Popper was nothing to do with all that. Just about the difficulties and dangers of dealing with knaves, suckers and their swamp, without getting drawn into it.

I'll admit to making frequent use of other men's sayings, but surely there's no harm in that when they express my thoughts better than I could express them myself. My hackles are raised by secondhand thinking -- when people adopt readymade prejudices. And I don't care whose prejudices we're talking about. I just want to ask people, what do YOU think, what do YOU feel?

That is what I appreciate when reading this thread.

If I said yesterday that, for me, David Carroll was welcome to ask his questions and put his views, I still feel the same way. What I'm not interested in is what his granddad or his party told him he was supposed to think. But the same goes for everyone, from right, from left, from center.

There's no interest in anyone, let alone politicians, who just says the right thing. We need to be one with our word.

(Having said which, I hope I can live up to it!)

Expand full comment

Great perspective you have, Peter. I've read your comments. My opinion is you do "live up to it"!

Expand full comment

How refreshing to be part of an online community where people quote Karl Popper. Alas, that thoughtful conservative would be a liberal in America's conservative party, or more likely, unwelcome altogether. Alas!

Expand full comment

Beware Logical Positivism bearing gifts to world hunger. It is cold hearted.

Expand full comment

I don't endorse Popper's views; it's just gratifying that LFAAers operate on an intellectual level high enough to encompass him.

Expand full comment

“They pull a knife, you pull a gun. They send one of yours to the hospital, you send one of theirs to the morgue."

Expand full comment

Sean Connery, The Untouchables. Always loved that line!

Expand full comment

Sean Connery: the cop who teaches Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner) about "The Chicago way."

Expand full comment

I always love that line too. TC you’re pulling that line out at exactly the right time. I could be wrong, but it looks like Biden is sweet talking them to their face and stabbing them in the back. Sweetly. Just as you suggest.

Expand full comment

Biden has the Republicans’ backs too. They just can’t recognize it. When we remove the knife they might see the reality that they have become better off as a result of his tough love.

Expand full comment

We all need to remember that there are Republican politicians, then Republican citizens. Of course, the third subset is Trumpublicans - hopefully an endangered species.

Expand full comment

David100%

Expand full comment

David! Nicely said! 🏆🏆

Expand full comment

His years in politics are serving him well - at least obstruct them or step over them.

Expand full comment

Thank you Nancy 🙏

His years in politics are serving all of us magnificently. I did not think I would catch myself saying this, Joe Biden was not my first choice, but he might be the best president I have seen in my lifetime. He is doing everything I would’ve wanted my first choice to do, and more. He is an attack dog. TC, are you seeing what I’m seeing with this Biden character? Does he meet up to your Sean Connery and Harrison Ford standards?

Expand full comment

I loved that scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark when Indiana Jones pulls out his gun.

Expand full comment

They actually just came up with that on the fly doing the scene. originally, Indy was supposed to use his bullwhip, but Harrison Ford said that all the Han Solo fans who were going to come see the movie weren't going to buy him doing that after he killed Greedo in the good Star Wars movie.

Expand full comment

I heard a different story, that he was sick that day and just trying to get through the day. He came up with the idea on the fly to end the scene quickly. I met my first actor ever a month ago, I’ll have to ask her.

Expand full comment

I now suspect he came up with the story I heard to make it sound more "actorly"

Expand full comment

The story I heard is from the era when Indiana Jones was produced, so perhaps you are right. Who knows. I’m not in that industry.

Hey TC, I asked you some questions elsewhere in this great discussion you started. I called Joe Biden an attack dog, among other things, (really? did I say that?) and I actually said that I thought, against my earlier opinion, that he might actually be living up to your Sean Connery and Harrison Ford standard. I was wondering what your take is on that. Like I said elsewhere here, Joe Biden was not my first choice, and I did not think I was going to like him. But now you are bringing the subject up. What’s your opinion?

Expand full comment

My first reaction was “but that’s what TFG (the former guy) would and did do.” I’ve got to toughen up and get more ballsy, admittedly an anatomical stretch for me, as does the rest of the Democratic Party.

Expand full comment

A Latino professor here in Miami once told his class that having "cojones" applied to either gender.

Expand full comment

Thank you Rob! Thank you MaryB! Thank you TC for this great discussion!

Expand full comment

Yep and maybe not wait for them to make the first move.

Expand full comment

The state legislatures are rolling fast:

"The GOP-led Georgia Senate just voted 29-20 to PASS #SB241, one of the worst voter suppression bills in the country. It would end no-excuse mail voting, increase voter prosecution, and add racist ID requirements. The GOP continues their relentless attack on voting rights."

https://twitter.com/fairfightaction/status/1369052609529716736?s=20

Expand full comment

I suspect that the ACLU and many other groups have all the paperwork pre-set for the law suits to start rolling in. It is going to be important to help finance the legal defense funds that are going to be litigating against these New Jim Crow laws.

Expand full comment

mark elias!!!

Expand full comment

What a setback, Ellie. I pray Stacey et al. will be able to overcome.

Meanwhile, here in Virginia things are looking up:

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/26/971366621/virginia-is-poised-to-approve-its-own-voting-rights-act

https://www.wric.com/news/virginia-voting-rights-act-passes-as-supreme-court-case-threatens-federal-protections/

Expand full comment

After reading a story in The Hill (I wait for Letters until the coffee is brewed) on the "surprise retirement" of a half dozen Republican senators, I had the idle thought as I poured the magic bean fluid of "We are going to have to Abrams the s*%t out of those states".

Quote from Matt Damon in "The Martian" where he says he has to "science the s*%t out of his surroundings to insure his survival.

Expand full comment

Agree as to making Abrams a verb!

Expand full comment

Absolutely. Unlike "Borking," "to Abrams" has a positive meaning.

Expand full comment

Ally, this comment makes my day! I’m all about science-ing the s*%t out of stuff, but had never thought of my modus operandi in those terms. And Abrams-ing the s*%t out of several states is my new goal. Let’s go!!

Expand full comment

😂👍🏼🙏🏼

Expand full comment

It is with dismay that I read about what is going on in Florida and the other states. I hope donations to FairFight and the Democrats will hep.

Expand full comment

The bright side: voter suppression has never been this obvious. Every news article I read calls it what it is, even if it doesn’t always mention the racist underpinning.

Expand full comment

This is also creating problems within GA's GOP, as they realise this voter suppression can also hurt THEM. Abrams and GA Democrats are on it, so I don't think it will proceed without a fight. Even Raffensperger and Gov. Kemp oppose restricting mail-in voting. After all, it WAS put forward several years ago by the GA GOP. I don't expect things to necessarily sail through without resistance. It'd be curious to see how H.R. 1, currently before Congress, might affect some of these blatantly discriminatory voting restrictions.

https://georgiarecorder.com/2021/03/09/no-excuse-voting-ban-creates-gop-schism-as-georgia-senate-presses-on/

Expand full comment

Ah yes. Geoff Duncan is boycotting. I smell a run for higher office coming. Kemp has to be careful to not alienate moderate Republicans, suburban women, and the moderate Democrats, since Trumpers want to burn him at the stake.

Expand full comment

These are getting beyond ridiculous: GOP proposal in Arizona would reject ballots that are postmarked after the Thursday before an election, even if the ballot arrives at the election office before the close of the polls https://trackbill.com/bill/arizona-senate-bill-1593-early-voting-time-limits-envelope/2009157/

Expand full comment

As Bruce Sellers wrote, “This is also creating problems within GA's GOP, as they realise this voter suppression can also hurt THEM.”

Remember: it is by shining the light into the dark corners that you root out the cockroaches and the corruption. Personally I think we have the Social Lepers party on the run. Between the Trumpster versus principled Republican fights, which includes and likely inspired the half dozen recent Senatorial retirements, and the spotlight on racist voter suppression legislation, the Good Side is winning. But I’m with TC and the rest of you: pedal to the metal. Keep the accelerator floored. Keep the aircraft throttle firewalled. GO TEAM‼️🎉❤️

Expand full comment

Not sure “nice talk” will be necessary. Their act is slowly becoming irrelevant. Georgia’s potential law is so nakedly racist that it will achieve at best, a Pyrrhic victory.

The struggle will admittedly be long and hard. But the Neanderthals are clearly on the run.

I often wonder, “What is the barrier to entry” to becoming a State (or Federal) legislature. Any state that would pass, or attempt to pass, a law making it illegal to feed, provide water, or in any way give material comfort to people waiting waiting in line to vote, would seem to have searched for the dumbest of the dumb to prop up in a legislative capacity. In the above case the fact that this is the product of panicked, vicious minds is obvious. But it’s not even self-serving. It is simply the capstone on a law that will provide vigorous, determined and highly motivated resistance.

Expand full comment

The cracks are already appearing in this minority party. Mitt Romney and others are beginning to embrace the possibility of social programs, etc. So, some of the opposition are realizing that they have to change their game plan. Even though Georgia Republicans are abandoning any attempt to portray themselves as pro-citizen, the Lt. Governor is boycotting this slew of repressive legislation. My guess is that he realizes that there will be tremendous pushback, and he has higher political aspirations that will be in danger That's good, but we need to continue to resist, and relax only a bit when it is clear that the Republicans have abandoned their forays into fascism and have a common goal of representing all citizens, not the interests of big business. As you so aptly stated Eric,, "the struggle will admittedly be long and hard."

Expand full comment

Nancy- Your words are true, holding "the enemies of Democracy accountable without apology or being "pollyanna" about this dire attack on Democracy. I wish to emmulate your razor sharp words that surgically expose the cancer of autocracy. Even though you are gracious, no one should mistake you for being Pollyanna.

Expand full comment

Jay, thank you so much for the compliments. Yes, I talk way too much, and spend some time "counseling" friends who are much nicer than I when they fret about "how could they do that" and man's inhumanity to man. I'm something of a mild cynic, and while I hope for the best in people and institutions, I see potential pitfalls. True - no Pollyanna here.😉

Expand full comment

I don't think they understand nice talk, or even truths that are self evident!

Expand full comment

You got that right

Expand full comment

I have long believed in the adage (I think it might be a Chinese saying - not sure): one cannot reason with mad dogs. Generally, where I grew up, a "mad dog" was handled with a burst of icy water. What I long for is to ice the GOP. Maybe if these obstructionist ancients have to stand and orate for hours on end a few of them will drop. One can hope.

Expand full comment

Being criminalized certainly qualifies as an icy blast of cold. Half a dozen Republican senators retiring, that’s another blow to their collective egos. Ellen, have you seen any of the video of whiners who were at the January 6 Riot and then were placed on the No Fly list, or Richard Barnett’s temper tantrum in court? That’s just the beginning. The biggest wake-up call for them will probably be Donald Trump going to jail. Before that happens, all 800 January 6 rioters will already be arrested. All of this pushback from the justice system and from their corporate funders is a big wake-up call for these smug buffoons.

Expand full comment

TC, get your facts straight. First, there are 49 legislatures that can be "controlled" as you put it. Nebraska is a unicameral legislature who's members are voted in nonpartisan.

As of February 1, 2021, 30 legislatures are totally controlled by Republicans with 23 States where the legislature and governorship is Republican. 18 legislatures are controlled by Democrats with 15 States having both the legislature and governor being Democrat. So where did the 43 come from?

When HCR talked about the one-party South from 1878 to the 1960s, she wasn't referring to "Dixiecans" but "Dixiecrats." The Democratic Party has a longer history of disenfranchisement of voting and other rights than the Republicans.

https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx#

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_the_Southern_United_States#1948:_Dixiecrat_revolt

Expand full comment

"The Democratic Party has a longer history of disenfranchisement of voting and other rights"

So what?? That was then, this is now. It's tedious to listen to folks who can't, or won't, distinguish between the Dems of the 1850s or Jim Crow era, and the contemporary Party. It is literally ignorant, i.e. ignor-ant, a deliberate choice to remain uninformed by disregarding facts. After the VRA in 1965, southern Dem vote suppressors migrated to the GOP where they found a hearty welcome. They've spent 50 years perfecting the suppression strategy and STILL won't cease and desist.

Another crucial difference today is that the GQP seeks, not to control or limit democracy, but to destroy it. The mob of filthy, seditious insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol was overwhelmingly Repuglycan; they will wear that badge of dishonor for eternity. It's not necessary to reprise their dismal litany of illegal and unconstitutional actions under Der Pu$$enGropenFuhrer, but anyone who doesn't see the pattern is ignor-ant. Dems have never had anything like the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy Hillary identified many years ago. Now, excuse me, I'm off to burn the Confederate flag in public.

E Foner, The Story of American Freedom

A Keyssar, The Right to Vote

L Litwack, Trouble in Mind

D White, To Heavy a Load

Expand full comment

I think you missed my point about the problem of one party domination. HCR referred to the time period, not I. And that period was lead by Democrats. I had written more, but chose to delete it.

As for the so what of history, perhaps Foner's 2017 interview in the Nation can shed some light.

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/trump-is-just-tearing-off-the-mask-an-interview-with-eric-foner/

Expand full comment

I don't deal in abstractions. National one-party rule is an abstraction, far less important than the actual, concrete results of GQP voter suppression and gerrymandering -- the product of one-party domination of red states. Dr Foner is a friendly acquaintance whose work is very familiar to me. Anyone can rummage through his oeuvre to find something that might support their views, especially from an interview which carries less weight than written publications. But his entire career shows that the large majority of his thought runs counter to yours.

Expand full comment

I wrote a long reply, posted it, and then deleted it.

First, as I see it, you are dealing in abstractions now. You, and others, have yet to prove that the GOP gerrymanders and that their success in "red" states is a result of such a charge. More importantly, you and others make it sound that Dems have never engaged in such activity. More importantly, as this inane threat started, it's based on an opinion that will be spread as truth. I only pointed out the facts and reassert what HCR stated, one party domination is wrong. We saw it with the Southern Democrats in the South for nearly 100 years. Your better argument would have been, right, but we've learned our lessons and are trying to change.

Second, I've read Dr. Foner's work. Agree with some, not sure I accept other points of view. But, I do agree that we need a usable history to make progress at working towards the goals of our Constitution. Maybe we should adopt the high school requirements of the Germans. Make our students visit slave housings on a plantation or German/Italian/Japanese internment camps (built during the Democratic Presidencies of Wilson and Roosevelt) or walk the streets of disadvantaged neighborhoods/slums/jails/battlefields where Native Americans died, etc. Maybe then they'll realize what our history is really like and make an effort to do better.

Third, and final point, I believe we need to start looking for common ground versus the great divide we now endure. It's hard work, but it needs to be done. And, I believe President Biden's call to end this Uncivil War, one that both parties share in the blame, must be started. That doesn't mean rolling over and playing dead. But, it does mean listening to what others say. Dems hold the national power now. If they want to continue to and disrupt the trend of mid-term elections, the party needs to find a common ground to bring Republicans into their camp. Calling them the GQP isn't it.

Expand full comment

Hi Larry.

Damn, I wish I had your post from yesterday.

Ok, on the gerrymandering question, I already mentioned California's history, that's all I know. End of story. The other experts here will have to engage you, and by now, they are reading the current HCR discussion. This page is old news.

I am of the opinion that the Southern Democrat Party bears little or no relation to the modern Democratic Party, but here again, Dr. Richardson or TPJ or Stuart or someone else will have to step in. In Lincoln's election, it was more like Europe is today, a multi-party system instead of a 2-party system, with 4 viable parties competing for representation in the WH. Somehow Lincoln won the election in what I have seen called in California a "jungle" election, which is a free-for-all, with everyone on the same ballot and not separate ballots like a primary election. The Southern Democrats became the party of the KKK, as disaffected Southerners, because it was the party of Southerners to begin with. Then somehow the Southern Democrats became merged with the Democrats, or changed names, I don't know, then LBJ and the Voting Rights Act drove them to the Republican Party.

I've never read Dr. Foner. That's between you and TPJ.

Of course I am in complete agreement with your statement about the high school requirements of the Germans. As far as I'm concerned, getting American high school students out of the classroom and into the field would give them education and knowledge they sorely lack.

Your final point about common ground: of course I agree completely, why else are you and I here having this conversation. I have had my father all my life, and I have engaged (albeit to a limited degree) in his social circle for decades, so I am accustomed to engagement and finding common ground. He and I love each other, even though we have so little in common, as it turns out, politically and socially. But nevertheless common ground is there, kindness, civility, generosity, mutual respect, there is plenty to recommend my father. People rave about him to me all the time.

I have received a bit of blowback, nothing serious but noticeable, here on HCR and elsewhere for taking what are apparently controversial positions. To your point: I think Adam Kinzinger, Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney voting for impeachment the 1st time, and other Republicans I could name, make a lot of sense, and they get my respect. Not my approval necessarily, not my undying love, but my respect. Even McConnell, whose methods I despise, has come out against the criminal Trump.

I hope you are ok with me disparaging 45, because this guy is so dirty in so many ways that it's impossible to keep track. He will need a presidential library just to contain all the evidence. Greg Olear on Substack has done numerous deep dive investigations, and nothing that comes out is ever pretty. Often, when the context is pertinent, I write his name as Tя☭mp because of his partnership with Putin. Remember them in Helsinki? Finland is kinda, sorta, in the Russian sphere of influence. From the Russian point of view, Finland is neutral ground, a fitting place for that meeting. Did we ever think we'd see a president who is friends with the leader of Russia? There is also sex crimes, there is NYC mob history (real estate related), there is financial corruption, each of these categories will require an entire wing in his presidential library.

Dr. Heather Cox Richardson tends to limit herself to what she knows, she has made that very clear, which means U.S. history. Russia is not her area of knowledge or expertise, so she stays on firm ground. However, I do not run this web site, I am not a respected historian with a reputation to uphold, I am merely a student, so I can speak as I please. These named Republicans care about the democracy enough, and are unswayed by the current anti-democratic tide enough, to get my tacit approval. My father voted for Mitt Romney back when he was running against Obama. I would have a conversation with Larry Hogan or Ben Sasse in a heartbeat. They might not get my vote if I were in their district, but hey, they would probably get my dad's vote.

Personally, I don't find it offensive to call the GOP the "GQP." However, I want to set the table with you, and that conversation is quite a bit more controversial than what we have been discussing, so I'll table it for now. I will say this: I do not identify as a Democrat. I may vote Democrat, but that's it, I do not affiliate with parties, although I could call myself a Green, which, curiously and ironically, appeared in Bavaria, the home of my heritage. If the Democratic Party started attracting racists and anti-Semites to its cause, I would disown them in a heartbeat. The man with the shirt that says "Camp Auschwitz" on the front and "Staff" on the back is not my friend. My wife saw that in real time, on TV, on January 6. She is half Jewish, her maternal relatives were wiped out of their town in what is now Belarus by the Germans. That's just an aside, but it's pertinent because it refreshes my other point, that these genteel words in print on HCR's web page may seem divorced from the real world, but they are not. Anti-Semitism wasted millions of lives. I have relatives who fought and died on what Nazi Germany called "the Eastern front," when Russians and eastern Europeans were considered subhumans. So blood is at stake here. Lives at are stake.

Speaking for myself, a party that coddles and takes in money and support from that demographic is not going to make me smile or make me just walk away.

In closing, Larry, I just want to say I am not conflict averse. I have defused tensions here. Not always successfully, but that seems to be my role, much more than being a source of history knowledge. So you can bring up anything with me that you like, anything. I can handle it. If I don't know enough, if my resources are insufficient, I will say so. I am that guy who runs counter to the stereotype: I use maps. I get directions. I read the instructions. I rely on resources and information, and I'm not shy about it. But I also don't accept information blindly, I am acutely aware of the reliability of a source, and even then, you have to remain cautious. For example, I am very skeptical of giving a political news TV show the name "Reliable Sources." Come on. If you just believe what people tell you, you deserve the consequences of being a misguided fool. That's how the Russians view DT, by the way, "a useful fool," a tool.

I stand on firm ground in certain areas, and when I do, you will have to use convincing arguments to get me to agree.

Good talking to you.

Hope your experience here in Dr. Richardson's subscriber community goes more smoothly from now on.

Enjoy the rest of your day and week. My best to you and your family.

Roland

Expand full comment

Hello again Larry! I'm at home, on my laptop, I can actually follow the discussion much more easily because of the much larger screen. It's snowing where I live in rural mountainous California, I'm not working tomorrow, perfect time to get back to you. Van Morrison is on Pandora, my wife is playing something called the J.J. Cale music channel, Lord knows what that is, but I love the songs that are playing. We just finished watching latest episode of To Tell The Truth, with Anthony Anderson and his mom Doris.

I am setting a scene to let you know I am a real person. You gave us a ton of information about yourself, but unfortunately I don't have access to it now: I'm sorry you deleted your post, it had a wealth of information. Normally we don't delete posts here, even with errors, we just correct in an add-on post. If I'd known this would happen, I would have copied and stored your words.

Since we are getting to know each other, a few things about me that most of the people here already know: I am 62. White, male and straight. That's important, it turns out, when we are discussing U.S. politics. I am not a FB or Tw or social media user, opposed to the business model. This forum is my first on-line community. Otherwise Greg Olear and Lucian Truscott on Substack, TC referred me to Lucian, and we have text groups in my family, that's it.

My parents were born in Germany and my dad in particular had a front-row seat for the entire Hitler administration, because he is from Munich. Our family lived in Germany in my teens, I knew my pro-Hitler grandmother, visited the paternal childhood home often, visited Dachau once, so I have some education with that period. All my heritage is German. I speak German, and am something of a linguist, certainly a better linguist than historian. I am the first in my immediate family born in this country, 2nd overall behind my 1st cousin Mike, my parents met in San Francisco and had me there. Public school in SF and the metro area, later graduated from a civilian school with an American high school diploma in Germany, college in southern California, engineering degree, Eagle Scout (you can take the boy out of Scouting, but you can't take Scouting out of the man), yada yada yada.

Not a historian, rely on the wealth and depth of knowledge here in this group, and trust me, it is extensive. I do not recommend underestimating that depth of knowledge, TPJ for example is a working history teacher in Boston, Linda Mitchell another history expert, TCinLA (I call him "TC") 20thC and WW2 and military and beyond expert, and the list goes on and on . . .

I am surmising you have been a Republican for a long time, perhaps are now, based on your post. My father is a diehard German-born conservative, and once he arrived in this country, lifetime Republican. Votes like clockwork, watches Fox and reads WSJ regularly. Drives me crazy my entire life, this month I have finally figured him out.

It has taken me a lifetime to discover who I am politically and socially. My wife is from southern California and moved to the SF area as soon as she could, but she could easily have been born in Berkeley, and in fact she lived next-door in Oakland for decades. Some of her closest friends are Cal grads. Her parents are actual Communists. Had to change lifestyle during Joe McCarthy years. Union organizer parents, mom with social worker degree from UCLA, believed in the ideal of communism until disillusioned by the Soviet Union and then abandoned it.

I didn't meet my wife knowing about her politics, that showed up later. I met her in a personal growth environment, what my dad would derisively call a hippie setting.

In context of a recent HCR discussion about Christianity, I found myself posting about my Christian pedigree. I didn't even know I had a Christian pedigree until a few weeks ago. Father raised Roman Catholic in Bavaria, where Josef Ratzinger, the last pope, is from. Went to Sunday School as an elementary school age kid. Even applied to Yale Divinity School in my 20s and got offered full ride scholarship, but changed my mind and took a different direction, aviation technology program. Learned mechanical stuff, machines and engines and aircraft and autos.

I have had more jobs than I can remember, my C.V. would run on for 10 to 20 pages. Transportation and psychology are the biggest themes. Very briefly aviation mechanic, 6 years limo and van driver, and for the last 23 years, trucking, so that's over 30 years in transport.

On this forum, I am testing out my knowledge of politics and society and U.S. history like never before. I'm no dummy, I was first (in my class of just 44) in H.S., but didn't take any history or politics in college, and my WW2 and Nazi Germany knowledge is self-taught.

Most of what I know about U.S. politics I learned in the past 12 months here on HCR and by reading the news. I defer to others constantly. Until now, spurned politics.

Ok, now to your post.

Roland

Expand full comment

Oh my. Hey TC, check this out, TPJ’s fuse got lit on your watch.

I’m giving TC the credit, semi-facetiously. Nobody has to agree with that.

Tom, love your passion. 🙏❤️😊❤️

Nice work holding your ground Larry Keeton. Keep up the good work.

Expand full comment

Thanks Roland.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hello Larry. I’m not in a great position right now to give your post the respect it deserves. I’m on the road working, driving truck, with my little iPhone. I think I had to scroll down 12 to 15 times just to read your entire post. For now, I will say this: I am glad that you are being honest about where you stand, and I accept your challenge of providing evidence and reasonable counter arguments to your points. But you’ll have to wait. I’ll give you just one small teaser: is there proof that removing gerrymandering sidelines Republican politicians? No, of course not. I’m not sure it’s provable. However, there is excellent evidence that a goodbye to gerrymandering means a goodbye to Republican power. In California after the 2010 census, a citizens group redistricted the entire state. Lots of public scrutiny of the entire process, tremendous amount of data and information brought to bear to decide exactly where to draw the lines. Widespread public approval of the process. In 2018, out of 53 California House districts, only 7 Republican House members. After 2020 election, I believe 12 Republican House members out of 53. Super majorities in both state legislatures. In California, the republican party as a political force is neutered, an endangered species. Still millions and millions of Republican citizens, just no political power. OK back to work. Thank you for engaging, I’ll get back to you.

Expand full comment

“As of February 19, 2021, state lawmakers have carried over, prefiled, or introduced 253 bills with provisions that restrict voting access in 43 states, and 704 bills with provisions that expand voting access in a different set of 43 states.”

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/state-voting-bills-tracker-2021

Expand full comment

Ellie, that does not mean 43 states are Republican or Republican controlled. In my own state, a blue one with both chambers and governor being Democrat, such bills have been introduced. How they fare time will tell.

MediaBias/Fact Check ranks the Brennan Center as highly factual, but puts the following caveat in their description of the organization.

"These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brennan-center-for-justice/

Expand full comment

I only supported the statistic of 43 states in which voter suppression measures have been introduced, as cited by the Brennan Center. I wrote nothing about the legislatures being Republican controlled or projecting how those bills would fare.

As for MediaBias, NY Times and WaPo did not even make their cut of unbiased, but North Korea Times did. MarketWatch has a better graph locating media on a left-right axis and factual-non-factual.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-biased-is-your-news-source-you-probably-wont-agree-with-this-chart-2018-02-28

Expand full comment

TC, your discussion is easily the best of the day and is possibly your best work here on HCR. 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

All my favorite people are showing up here.

Expand full comment

You are welcome. :-)

Expand full comment

The state legislatures in red states are having a massive temper tantrum. Courts have to take it on now, and I worry about McConnell's little band of loyalists in there.

Expand full comment

THANK YOU TO ALL OF YOU 🙏🙏❤️❤️

My whole life I’ve been trying to figure out my dad. I’ve been trying to figure out myself too in relation to him. It has all come together for me.

The root of the conservative world view is maintaining the status quo, maintaining the old society. So now I have no trouble seeing the link between making Mr. Potato Head gender neutral, and ending publication of certain Dr. Seuss books, and banning Confederate flags from NASCAR, and trans toilets, and racism-based voter suppression, and why Trump is their hero, and all of it. The Republican Party, the country club set, the Mercedes and mini-mansion fixation, all of it is my dad and all of it clicks now.

The old society is based in unacknowledged racism, unacknowledged sexism, unacknowledged hetero-ism, and ostentatious & gaudy (and nauseating) status symbol and prestige displays. Even the part Republican politicians being about self-service instead of public service.

My entire life I’ve hated all of it. Retch. And now I can identify it clearly and see all of it.

The many disparate issues and aspects, the seemingly disconnected rants and complaints, all make sense to me now. All of it fits together perfectly.

Thank you so much Dr. Richardson. Thank you so much all of you. You have been an invaluable catalyst in my education. I owe all of you a great debt of gratitude.

Expand full comment

Roland, your personal journey certainly has a solid ring of truth for me. I grew up in a family of privilege, and "practiced"all that goes with it. We called my father "the general" because he ruled the house with an iron, bigoted, misogynist, xenophobic fist. Somehow, I managed to escape most of that except not totally realizing my own white privilege. Not so all my family. I wish there were more folks in the world, including the fools in Congress, who would take the time to reflect as you have.

Expand full comment

Very touching. Thank you Pam 🙏

Expand full comment

Roland you are so right. Canary in the coal mine. Change is a-comin'. I'm not done with this yet, but here is a concluding snippet:

"Indeed, we are walking backwards into the future. I look to indigenous tribes such as the Lakota in North America or the Musica in South America for examples of large social groups. The ancient worldview where fear is replaced with hope, inner truths are valued above all, community wellness and resiliency is a prime driver, and equality of the masculine and feminine will dominate our social relations."

Expand full comment

Roland, so much of what you say rings true for me, too. I think we share the German immigrant father, too, and I never discount how his experiences here during the war, as a young boy, shaped his world view, never mind his typically German domineering mother. But. What I think you get wrong is the mini-mansion, ostentatious wealth part. As a prep school girl, and a peripheral participant in the country club cotillion set, ostentation was never part of it. For people with true inherited wealth, that was frowned upon, and I assume still is. We all wore battered Top Siders, drove old volvos, and that was the public face of it. Old money didn’t flaunt. I think in part that’s why Trump was rejected by NY society - he is nouveau riche to the core, and the antithesis of what they are. I much prefer the university circle we move in now, and have left that world behind, so maybe things have changed. But I doubt it.

Expand full comment

Hello Kathy. Love love your message. My ex-wife is Boston blue blood and NY Vanderbilt old money. I know exactly what you mean, I had quite the education into that world. I also went to a private school, so I know about that tattered jeans look. But think about it. The original racists were royalty and slaveowners and industrialists. The richest people. The ones trying to rule everything and everybody. They thought they owned the world, and at the height of the British Empire and the Spanish Empire, they effectively did. Ignore what I said about ostentation. Just think hideous amounts of wealth. The racism and sexism of extreme wealth is legendary. That’s all I have to say.

Expand full comment

Well said, Roland! Power is hard to come by, but even harder to relinquish. For over 400 years, the white minority has used hate and fear to suppress the 'mudsills' of society that outnumber them. We were naive to think that the election of Barack Obama was the beginning of a post-racial America. At best it was an acknowledgement of the impact of the civil rights movement of the mid Twentieth Century. But that's the short game, and the long game is on their side.

Expand full comment

President Obama's election was not the beginning of a post-racial America, but was rather the rebirth of Jim Crow. My friends on the "right" are saying that Obama's presidency "recreated" racism. I say it ripped the scab off of a badly infected wound and we got left with all the nastiness from such a wound.

Expand full comment

What Obama’s presidency exposed was the failure to deal with America’s GREAT Big Lie: that white people are superior to people of color. We did not address that lie after the Civil War, and it came roaring back in 1877. We have continued to be negatively impacted by that GREAT Big Lie to the extent that one political party doesn’t even want our government to be successful and perfect the union for everyone.

Expand full comment

Before the 21C, Andrew Johnson was definitely the Worst President Ever. He almost singlehandedly killed Reconstruction by requiring only abolition from seceded states to rejoin the Union, while enabling their worst practices. The resulting Black Codes were slavery in all but name. This despite a Congress and admin that clearly supported Freedpeople's rights. For several years the Grant admin tried heroically to defend them, but the so-called Redeemers ultimately re-entrenched white supremacy.

Expand full comment

Always appreciate your historical perspective TPJ 🙏

Expand full comment

Thank you Jennifer, really nicely stated 🙏

Expand full comment

Fresh air might help heal the pustulant wound. We are short sighted creatures. We want it all now and this is a very long game. As the Italians say, piano piano piano.

Expand full comment

Conservatives have been playing the long game since Ross Perot received almost 19% of the vote but not one Elector in 1992. That was when the conservatves decided to take over the Republican Party. The Progressives did not start the long game until the year 2000 when Gore and Bush refused to allow Nader to even attend the presidential debates.

Independent votes represent hundreds of thousands of voters.

Http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-election-day/third-party-candidates-having-outsized-impact-election-n680921

Expand full comment

Roland you're one of the people who I think of as the "canary int he coal mine" members of this conversation group. When you erupt I know to get super worried.. Although I am now one of the very privileged, both sides of my family were definitely hardscrabble when they arrived here from their various places of origin. The good news is that, when they did achieve financial and social success they did not lose that understanding of where they came from, perhaps because neither side was mainstream in most ways that rendered someone acceptable to Mittle Amerika. I never had to struggle against the complacency and smugness of white privilege in my family so I had that secure space, even cocooned inside the privilege my father and (on the maternal side) my great-grandfather worked so hard to achieve. I think it made a difference. I am so grateful I don't have to fight with family members about politics! It was hard enough dealing with my EX-spouse about it . . .

Expand full comment

Here’s the mystery, Roland. Did Hasbro castrate Mr. Potato Head so no one could see his genitals? That would be the extreme remedy. Why didn’t they just paint him some pants? I think there should be an investigation.

Expand full comment

Well summarized Roland.

Expand full comment

There is power in finally being able to put a name to discomfort and discontent that eats away at us.

Expand full comment

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV). “The filibuster should be painful, it really should be painful and we've made it more comfortable over the years,” Manchin said yesterday on the Fox News Channel. “Maybe it has to be more painful.” Well, hot dog. I wonder who lit a fire under Senator Manchin's behind? He surely didn't do this of his own volition.

And so, after the RNC tells Donald that they CAN use his image they fluff him up by booking events at his dreadful, tacky club in April. This is how Trump has managed to live his entire life - by bending people over a barrel so far and so hard that they have to play his game. Republicans aren't just deplorable they're weak-willed, lily-livered chumps. Disgusting. I'm going to bed. Good night Heather, good night one and all. Sleep well.

Expand full comment

Disgusting, indeed. For when you wake up...Morning, Daria!!

Expand full comment

Morning, Lynell! Morning, Daria! Morning, all!

Expand full comment

Good morning, Karen!

Expand full comment

Oops, It's afternoon now. Afternoon, Karen!!

Expand full comment

And I love all your posts Lynell ❤️❤️

Expand full comment

I love this post Daria

Expand full comment

Thanks, Roland!

Expand full comment

It is beyond pitiful that even with what TFG has done to effectively end the Republican party, they continue to pay him homage and increase his coffers. I've got Sicilian blood in my veins, and I guarantee you we would never let anyone do this! Tony Soprano, where are you when we need you?

Expand full comment

Hope you had a restful night...

Expand full comment

Thanks. It was too short but restful nonetheless.

Expand full comment

Yes, the filibuster...

Option A) Leave things the way they are, so meaningful election reform, infrastructure improvement, existentially necessary legislative responses to climate change (the elephant in the room), police reform, common sense gun and immigration laws, reinstatement of the fairness doctrine, fairer wealth distribution via more progressive taxation, eventual elimination of the Electoral College (and the list is very long given how little good governance we have had since, well, LBJ) WILL NOT HAPPEN under this administration, leading to significant GOP gains in the 2022 mid-terms. End of American democracy.

Option B) Eliminate the filibuster (or return it to the Jimmy Stewart model, though why we would do that - except to save face for a few Demopublicans - I can barely imagine) and pass all of the above or even just a few of the above and take it to the voters in 2022. Joe Biden will be a national hero in the mold of FDR and Kamala Harris will carry on in the same vein in 2024. The GOP will either change or disappear. Trump will die in prison.

We have seen that government by reconciliation and presidential decree cannot do enough and causes even greater political division than the already unsustainable variety we have now.

This is not the moment to try to return to a Reaganesque-Clintonesque "normal". No, it is time to live up to our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and institute - finally - government of, by and for the people.

This may be our last chance.

Expand full comment

I'll take option B. We The People, All Of Us This Time, Every Time, For All Time.

Expand full comment

I’m with option B as well, I say Game On, we didn’t flip the senate here in GA and rid ourselves of the insipid occupant of the WH only to watch it fritter away, the just passed recovery bill is only the beginning, of the changes we need to make to reorient this nation so that it benefits all of us, not just the people that will never be able to spend the money they already have.

Expand full comment

Option B for me too.

Expand full comment

I'm with B. We have the chance to govern...Let's do it! Let's not let this opportunity slip away. Stacie Abrams pulled off a miracle in Georgia. We cannot squander the hard work and hard won votes of Democrats and Progressives. Let's start burying fascism and greed and protect the vote. Is there a risk if we abolish the filibuster? Yes, but a greater risk if we achieve nothing in the next two years. Offense is very often the best defense.

Expand full comment

WE need to fix this NOW! You all know that if...or when...Republicans gain control of the Senate again, the filibuster will be gone in a New York minute!

Expand full comment

The future of the fillibuster is indeed an important issue, about which two things need to be clarified: (1) This is NOT a constitutional question, but "only" about the rules of the Senate. It's remarkable, and difficult to explain to folks who aren't polit-junkies, that so much hangs on that kind of issue; (2) if Prof. Richardson is correct, and I believe she is, the slogan "end the fillibuster" is clearly based on a fundamental misunderstanding. If Sen. Manchin is right, and surely he knows what he's talking about in this case, the issue is NOT ending the fillibuster altogether, but restoring the "painful" fillibusters of yesteryear. Do Democrats really want to go there? Those southern fillibusterers (what a word) were nominally also Democrats, but not the kind the modern party wants to have anything to do with. the accurate slogan would appear to be "end the supermajority, restore majority rule in the Senate". Unfortunately, the train has already left the station, so "end the fillibuster" it will be in media-land. Disappointment on the left is preprogrammed. Besides, if the DEMS somehow manage to lose control of both houses in 2022, they will surely wish they had retained this weapon. Joe Biden has a point; be careful what you wish for.

Expand full comment

Yes, “End the filibuster” is as unfortunate a slogan as “Defund the police”. But I agree that it should at least be returned to the rules that require a senator to actually stand there and talk, on topic. No more EZ Pass.

Expand full comment

As someone who by any American standard I know of is way out on the left on most issues and as a white 69 year-old man who totally agrees with the objectives of the Black Lives Matter movement, I think "Defund the police" is one of the dumbest political slogans ever coined. Who came up with this? Roger Stone? Sure, as a leftie I see where this comes from and that it doesn't literally mean "disband the police", but isn't the idea to convince voters who may not be knee-jerk progressives or African Americans that there is a serious problem with how policing is done in most of America, that it is shot through with racism and abuse, and that the legal system and our best wishes alone cannot make things better, so we need to REFORM the police? Just asking...

As a slogan, "end the filibuster" may not be the greatest, but at least it's not the worst.

Expand full comment

I think it should be "Demilitarize the police."

Expand full comment

I have tried using the word "refocus" the police, often with "let them do what they do well, and leave the "catchall" responsibilities that have come with the continuing decline in social, mental, scholastic revenues and make everything from truancy to homelessness to mental illness into police problems. Cops don't do mental health treatment well, nor do they have the training or temperament to handle social issues, especially with no resources to offer.

Expand full comment

Sure, "defund the police" is misplaced. But remember how high feelings ran after we lost George Floyd? Those towering emotions cannot be denied. The hostility DTP evoked shows how potent it is: hit 'em in the budget, it's the only place they feel anything. Tat is the proper starting point of discussion.

NB, I wish I had been part of LFAA back in the June Days. Community was so important then. It always is.

Expand full comment

It’s not always true that they don’t have the capability. I have a police officer in my family who is good at it. But it is difficult and it’s very difficult to be ready to defend yourself against a moral attack and be is psychological counselor. First you have to determine if people have a gun or a knife in their pocket

Expand full comment

In addition to making a senator actually stand and talk if they want to stall a bill, there is one other crucial adjustment needed. Instead of requiring a 60% to end the filibuster, flip it: require a 40% vote to keep it going. That way, the minority party doing the blockade has to keep 40 senators (while there is a total of 100) present at all times, or the majority can wind a vote to end debate. Make the obstructors bear the burden.

Expand full comment

Lovely, what is the procedure to make it happen?

Expand full comment

Get Manchin and Sinema on board. Have VP Harris ready to break a tie. Schedule a vote on a Senate rule change.

Expand full comment

An interesting solution.

Expand full comment

I think I agree with you. It’s a thorny problem and I wonder how it will work itself out. Our country needs this bill to protect voting rights and honestly it’s 2021 and it’s like we’re still fighting a civil war. We spend so much time fighting when we could be working together.

Expand full comment

We ARE still fighting a civil war ... perhaps of a different nature, though.

Expand full comment

Yeah, now the southern racists don't want to leave, they just want to dictate.

Expand full comment

And all the while, shouting, "freedom".

Expand full comment

My husband went down to Savannah one year when we were friends and helped officiate some sailboat races. He said he and his team had some awkward interactions and they decided they just didn’t enjoy the southerners. I just want them to turn a corner get over it. Actually they should apologize for seceding and creating this never ending mess. I guess it’s like a huge family rift that goes on and on.

Expand full comment

So on a certain level I have to say this is completely crazy and maybe why my French friends say you Americans just love to fight. I’m an American and I don’t like fighting— I’ll do it if I have to but I’d rather get along. From my perspective and we do have a southern daughter in law-/ it’s almost like they had to convince themselves that slavery was really ok and that the damn Yankees just destroyed everything and that they’ve got to stick together in this opinion. Meanwhile there are no more working plantations that I’m aware of and how many years has it been. Why can’t they just get over it 146 years later?

Expand full comment

That's a mighty broad brush you're painting with. There are plenty of southerners who are just as opposed to racism as I assume you are. I'm one of them.

Expand full comment

I grew up in the south, and will stop using the broad brush when DEMs take a few more Senate seats and Prez votes in that region. So far, folks like you don't seem to be in the majority there.

Expand full comment

I am glad to hear that and assume as much because of the vote in Georgia.

Expand full comment

Good morning, Liz.

https://www.mic.com/articles/88461/a-modern-day-slave-plantation-exists-and-it-s-thriving-in-the-heart-of-america

Just went down a rabbit hole exploring the current state of plantations. They are still around, many as tourist spots, but Angola, it was a plantation and now is a prison plantation. The lede photograph is just horror.

My family of origin, god-fearing fundamentalists, hold tightly to a patriarchal position of white male supremacy. The god/father figure owns the chattel (land, women, children, animals). The entitlement of ownership gives rise to the abuses of power over. These men (and women who become honorary men [aka 'token torturers' see Mary

Daly]) don't have to own Black people to continue the culture, they just want everyone to "know their place" and stay in it.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the explanation— now I know why our Harvard/Stanford educated southern daughter in law lets her husband control everything and barely says boo at the dinner table—I’ve never been able to fathom it. Thank you!

Expand full comment

It's odd that the French, whose streets are often filled with the Gilet Jaunes, riot police, tractor protests, and who accept the clearing of the Calais "jungle", etc, think Americans "love to fight." Granted, the US probably racks up more protests, especially in smaller communities, but it was the American Revolution that actually inspired France's will to overcome their monarchy! Rousseau's words “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains” continue to inspire movements around the world. So, I say, France should be proud to have provided the psychological underpinnings for America's dedication to freedom and the continual struggle it demands.

Expand full comment

Et maintenant, mes amis, nous chantons avec Victor Laszlo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOeFhSzoTuc

Toujours encore!

Expand full comment

Oui Janjamm all u say is true but the French are full of contradictions unlike us. Sorry I’m being sarcastic.

Expand full comment

It is difficult to work with supremacists for All The People's rights.

Expand full comment

For sure and they don’t come out front and say I’m a white supremacist either— for some of them it’s an unconscious drive.

Expand full comment

Absolutely

Expand full comment

So Norm Orenstein has a couple of theories that might appeal to Manchin. One is to keep the minority party on the floor for days on end debating the issue. The fact is that all of them must be in the Senate chambers. Orenstein figures that a lot of the Repubs will get tired or bored about the debate, that a few would succumb to joining the Dems. At least, that is what I understand. Here is Orenstein’s thoughts: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/03/02/manchin-filibuster-never-sinema/?outputType=amp

Expand full comment

I like the other proposal which is to change the filibuster needing 60 votes to stop the debate to the filibuster needing 40 (actually Norm Orenstein thinks the ideal is 41) to keep the debate going. That means the minority has to work at it but one still has the filibuster available at the times it is needed. But it gets rid of the easy obstruction it now represents.

Expand full comment

The thing I do like is that the minority (Repub) has to actually work!

Expand full comment

And show up! Too many of the senators are lacking the will to work or show up for the hard stuff.

Expand full comment

Confiscate their phones at the door, like the juveniles they are.

Expand full comment

Great idea—and their guns

Expand full comment

Right they don’t even pay attention when they’re there sometimes.

Expand full comment

And publicly vote against popular legislation

Expand full comment

I can picture the likes of Rand Paul or Ted Cruz playing computer games or doodling while a party member is "orating" during a filibuster. And, I agree making it a painful experience is the way to go for now.

Expand full comment

Hey, Marlene! Posted this article, too. Great minds...?

Expand full comment

You know, Lynell, I just love that!

Expand full comment

Thanks for this. I like Orenstein's stuff, but armchair psychology isn't my thing - too many imponderables in strategizing of this kind.

Expand full comment

I used to get mixed up between Orenstein and Ornstein, too. That's why I re-checked the spelling of his name when I post.

I just now re-checked it, again, and changing my typing from Ormstein to Ornstein got rid of that squiggly red line under the misspelling. Now how did the Spelling Gods of Silicon Valley know that?

Expand full comment

Honestly I am tired of Joe Manchin having an oversized influence. He is power drunk

Expand full comment

It is unnerving and I find I grit my teeth more and more every time he says something. Sinema...just so disappointed in her!

Expand full comment

He's taking what the situation gives him. The best way to change that would be for the DEMS to win a few more Senate seats in 2022.

Expand full comment

I agree that "restore majority rule in the Senate" is a much better slogan than "end the filibuster", as at least a few (not too many, I hope) uninformed Americans will be surprised to know that any majority can be different from a simple one-vote majority or that - for some time, now - most legislation can only be passed in the Senate with a 20-vote majority, so that most House-passed legislation is never even considered by the Senate, and that is why our nation appears to moving backward and not forward (whatever that means). We politics junkies know all this stuff, but lots of nice - and not so nice - folks don't.

On the other hand, worrying about what a future GOP-controlled Senate might do in the absence of the filibuster is pointless. Clearly this GOP would not think twice about eliminating it in service of their nefarious designs. If the DEMs under Biden are crippled by fear at the very moment they can actually turn around 40 years of trickle-down, laissez-faire, survival-of-fittest, who-you-lookin-at-boy misgovernment, then why on earth did we vote for them? If it is our destiny to have to live in an authoritarian, racist oligarchy, well, let's just get on with it. To the barricades! Nothing is forever except death.

Expand full comment

This moment appears to be the only chance to pass HR 1, Voting Rights Bill, in the Senate. If it requires ending the filibuster, do it. This one bill can do more to return our democracy to its foundations than any legislation since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. LBJ, who initiated the '65 legislation and signed it, was the very model of daring-do. He wouldn't hesitate. The Democrats should go there because without restoring voting rights, there is no democracy.

Expand full comment

Getting rid of the filibuster makes sense to a lot of people. The votes are not there to do it. Making the filibuster a lot more painful and obvious is a step in the right direction, and it just might have the necessary votes. If even that does not get the voting rights bills past, maybe the holdouts will change their minds and vote to abolish. It's only been a pro-slavery, anti-civil rights maneuver anyway. I do remember Ted Kennedy using it to block Nixon's health care plan - the one that was the basis for Romney's plan in MA and then for Obama's - because it lacked a public option. That turned out to have been a mistake.

Expand full comment

Hello Joan. The US healthcare insurance system pre-ACA was an abomination, while Obamacare is - at best - a significant but inadequate incremental improvement. My wife and I are over 65 and living on govt. pensions in Italy. I recently had a small skin tumor surgically removed, while my wife had a cataract fixed, all without pain or complication. The bill? What bill? This is Italy. Healthcare here is a right written into the Constitution. We have never received a bill for healthcare in Italy. Most Americans have no idea of how bad they have it when it comes to healthcare.

I guess if Joe Manchin and a few other "moderate" Democrats dig in their heels over the filibuster, US healthcare will continue to be an embarrassment for the foreseeable future. Ted Kennedy should not have used the filibuster to block Nixon's healthcare plan because - like Obama's - it was no doubt better than nothing and might have morphed into something more appropriate for a wealthy and powerful democracy, who knows?

Well, that was then, when there were still a few liberal Republicans, a few conservative Democrats, and general agreement that government was not something to be derided and then drowned in a bathtub, but in today's political hell, the GOP has become an organized crime syndicate aspiring to dictatorship. The events of Jan 6th are proof that I am not merely ranting here.

The bottom line is that there is no room for error or half-measures now. Despite the cheap, instant transmission of an infinite amount of information to anyone with a smartphone and easy access to reliable sources of fact-based news, many poorly educated Americans are in thrall to gurus, seers, and noisy paranoid schizophrenics who exploit their lack of knowledge and discernment and can convince them of almost anything. Throw in residual and not-so-latent racism and other forms of xenophobia, 40+ years of stagnant middle-class wages, rising rents, unaffordable higher education and the fetishization of the invisible hand and $$$$ and we have a dire situation that must be radically changed before the midterm elections in 2022.

But no, now we have to worry about a supposed Democrat's nostalgia for a Senate rule based on a mistake made by Aaron Burr a couple of hundred years ago and used to greatest effect in my lifetime to block Jim-Crow-killing civil rights bills. Will this last, best chance to save our democracy be simply (excuse the expression) pissed away if the "holdouts" maybe don't change their minds?

Expand full comment

Thanks, David, for this good summary of politics since Nixon. In retrospect, some see him as the last liberal president of the 20C, If liberalism is defined as believing in government's role and using it to advance the common good. When it came to dirty tricks, conspiracy, secret bombings etc, definitely not so much.

Expand full comment

TPJ! True, Tricky Dicky had his points. Wicked 5 o'clock shadow, however, and often slick with sweat when he was lying.

Expand full comment

Don't forget Patty Murrey's filibuster in Texas to prevent an anti-abortion bill being passed before the legislture adjorned until after the election.

Expand full comment

There are a few things that are so solidly consistant, they might as well be considered forever. Gravity for example, exists throughout the universe. They discovered even light survives entry into a black hole. Many processes go through cycles of consistant change but continue forever such as the planets traveling around a sun. Why is Western Civilization blinded by the death of all things rather than the shared reality of renewal such as Spring?

Expand full comment

Fascinating quandary

Expand full comment

Heard on Rachael Maddow podcast, Georgia is pursuing racketeering charges against Trump that could carry a 20 year sentence. They have hired an expert on such cases.

Expand full comment

"There are not a lot of people who avoid serving prison time on a racketeering offense”

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_6043d4c0c5b660a0f388d591

"Three top administrators were sentenced to seven years in prison, with 13 years’ probation. Five lower-ranking educators received one- to two-year prison terms." https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-atlanta-teachers-sentence-deal-20150414-story.html

Expand full comment

Good morning everyone! HCR: "nothing you can't miss"? Reading this letter this morning belies that statement! The groveling and temper tantrums of the Gormless Ones and the Cheeto? Where will that end up? And, even more stark for our future, the fight over the filibuster. I disagree with the people who say that returning it to its original intent--to make it painful--is pointless. I think it is insufficient, but I DO think that it will give pause to the Mindless-Powermongering Wing (Hawley, Cruz, etc) because in my experience of these guys and gals they don't want to work that hard. That is why the Repugnants (to borrow a term from one of my companions here) changed the nature of the filibuster in the first place. Any move forward is positive--even if it is baby steps.

For me the news from yesterday that had me pausing was the news that Roy Blunt has decided not to run for re-election in 2022. I am surprised by this but, in another way, not surprised. He is a mainstream GOP guy from a long lineage of MO pols. He is playing with the idea of running for Prez but he is about as interesting as string cheese, and about as slippery. The tension between him and Hawley is also pretty clear--Hawley is enough of a narcissist that he thinks he can ignore the senior Senator with impunity. What Hawley doesn't understand is that Blunt--although I loathe and detest his politics on every level--is a legit "nice guy," who is well liked. He told my Congressman, Emmanuel Cleaver II, privately that he was not going to run, which considering their radical differences was a gentlemanly move that Cleaver appreciated.

So now we have a tiny opening in Missouri for 2022. And we need to drive a big ol' bulldozer through it.

Expand full comment

Roy Blunt is retiree #5, Missouri Senator since 2011. Somehow he managed to become the fourth highest Republican in the Senate. It’s obvious that he is a huge loss by reading McConnell’s statement. (see link)

We already have the Republican Senate departures of Pat Toomey (PA since 2011), Richard Burr (NC since 2005), Rob Portman (OH since 2011), and Richard Shelby (AL since 1987).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/blunt-senate-republicans-missouri-greitens/2021/03/08/28f9ade0-8028-11eb-ac37-4383f7709abe_story.html?outputType=amp

[begin quote]

Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, told reporters Monday that Blunt’s decision — joining the other GOP senators who have opted for retirement — “speaks volumes about what is happening in the Republican Party right now.”

“That certainly means that Republicans are viewing their party as in trouble, as one that is going to have a real difficult year next year,” he said.

[end quote]

Expand full comment
<