986 Comments

It is up to us. To do all the work. We cannot expect nor should we want the burden to be shouldered only by our chosen President.

Expand full comment

Heather, this is the best substack essay you have written, at least for me. THANK YOU!!

Expand full comment

I was thinking the exact same thing, Rhea! For the first time in what seems like forever, I am hopeful that our country will survive as a democracy and oh boy! Does it ever feel good!

Expand full comment

May I suggest that we all take a bit of time and open Fox and place comments in argument to the issues of Harris and democracy. I regularly post comments. But we should swamp Fox with our political points. And it’s fun to watch the responses.

Expand full comment

Swamp Fox was the guerilla name of Brigadier General Francis Marion, the Revolutionary War patriot hero who operated from a hidden base in the swamps of South Carolina to help defeat the British. Looks like we need some Swamp Fox email guerrillas to help defeat the wannabe king Trump. Sign me up!

Expand full comment

Of course, going into the Fox News website is very much like walking into a swamp. It’s a long, stinky slog you can’t wait to get out of! SHOWER NEEDED IMMEDIATELY!🤣🤣

Expand full comment

There was a kid's program from Disney about Swamp Fox when I was a kid in the early (and maybe later) '60s. I still remember the melody and most of the words to the theme song (below see the video).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVllY7i8EnA/

My house was owned previously by one of his descendants, Francis Marion Garth.

Expand full comment

Swamp Fox, Swamp Fox

Hiding in the Glen

Swamp Fox, Swamp Fox with his band of men….

Expand full comment

I remember that show. We played Swamp Fox at school.

Expand full comment

We played in the alley behind our houses.

Expand full comment

For years now, I have spent almost every day, sometimes hours at a time, on Facebook and Twitter, respectfully commenting and posting documented truth and facts on Fox and other rightwing pages and sites, but always only fact-based and politely, to correct misinformation, lies and name-calling.

Expand full comment

thank you Karin. that's important and hard work!

Expand full comment

Good idea👏 Fox needs to be swamped👊

Expand full comment

Where does one to this? Is it at an on-line site?

Expand full comment

Just search Fox News and go to their news web site. you do need to sign up as with everything else. Www.Foxnews.com

Expand full comment

Screw fox. Yerrr pissing into the wind. They've been given a job to do. Instead, flood their "enabler$$'$. Yeah..!! Dump 'A Load' of.., yeah.. you know 'of what', in their driveway. In the form of "emails" of course. I passed a Faux News truck while rolling down I65 last night, the hood was open, steam coming out and a puddle oil draining into the ditch.., I tooted my horn, gave em the finger and kept on rolling along. I did notice a AAA sticker on the van rear rear window, so I figure they'll be okay despite there being no cell-phone coverage in that vicinity. Ohh welll. (hey.. relaxxx., it was just a dream.., just a dream gentle readers..).

Expand full comment

I know you are being… like me a wise ass. But it doesn’t hurt to post comments on the enemy boards just like we get one once in awhile here. They buy a week subscription and. Ess with us. I’ve been doing this on Fox for awhile. Sometimes I tr and reason with them but more often, I yap away. As I said, it’s therapy. I did send two letters to Harris headquarters asking them to consider a plan enacted years ago in CT. There was a 3-way race for senate. A popular democrat but who was really republican, was running after he lost the democratic nomination. My mini plan was to find a friend who was not likely to vote but who would vote democratic if she did. I chatted with her periodically over a few months about the importance of voting. She got the message and when I called her on Election Day and asked if she needed a ride to the polls, she told me she had already voted. But a few months before Election Day, I called the manager of the candidate Ned Lamont who is now our governor and told him my plan and advised him to make it the plan for Al, his supporters. Theoretically the vote count could have doubled. And it’s hard to try and get o e person to the polls. But his response was, ,Why only one why not ten people?” Iknew he didn’t take me seriously and his candidate lost. Joe Lieberman represented CT as a virtual republican for 6 years. End of story.

Expand full comment

Bill, I thank you for your comment. I'm flattered that you even took the time to read my "put' on things. I enjoy tossing my thoughts out here, not for the amusement or levity they may carry.., but for the value they contain accumulated, during my passage these brief 81 years. And, I would have to agree, that "the value" might not always be clear to the reader... whomever. But, I alone felt it worth typing while considering the views expressed by others like yourself. Always, my hope is, that someone will get it. "Someone" does... me thinks.

Expand full comment

Now I don't feel so bad that I ask that same question!

Expand full comment

I had the same question, too!

Expand full comment

Recommend same for the Wall Street Journal. It's echo-y over there.

Expand full comment

I didn't know that was possible!! Let's roll!

Expand full comment

How do you open Fox? I would be happy to comment!

Expand full comment

From a previous comment. Just search Fox News and go to their news web site. you do need to sign up as with everything else. Www.Foxnews.com

Expand full comment

It’s easy and fun and you can be as provocative as you wish. If you get banned, you just follow the prompts and Fox sends you an email to reset. I often get banned and need to reset. I just posted all kinds of stuff about internment camps for MAGAs. And I don’t hold back. I’ve posted a call to ban the Republican Party. Posted federal-funded internment camps for magas run by drag queens. It therapy for me.

Expand full comment

I need my therapy. Bye for now. Going to Fox. Don’t open Fox business just Fox. It’s more popular.

Expand full comment

Therapy is healthy!

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

I think this is what’s called “the arc of history bending towards justice”…I hope…let’s keep up the good fight.

Expand full comment

I am certain you're right, but I think the repeating pattern comes from something older than human history. Consider the following story I heard from Kim Polman of Reboot the Future:

The story of the imaginal cell is about the transformation of the caterpillar to the butterfly. The caterpillar gorges throughout its life until it reaches a tipping point and goes into its cocoon to protect itself from a world that is revolting against its greed. Shut off from the world, it begins to decay. In the chaos of decay, the imaginal cells, that were latent but there all along, begin to come alive. As they do, they are being attacked by the old way of doing things. The imaginal cells communicate with and find each other by emitting a common frequency. Eventually, the old way of doing things gives up and the butterfly emerges.

Ref: Being Human podcast, episode 84.

The common frequency I believe we are using to communicate with and find each other is the "treat others the way you would want to be treated if the shoe was on the other foot" principle. The "enemy" is not other people. Instead, the enemy is the only alternative to that moral principle, which is the immoral "do unto others before they do unto you" principle.

Expand full comment

Amen🙏🌹

Expand full comment

Carol, what an excellent call to action Heather has written for us. And it does feel good. I am glad to read a letter and responses that do not make my stomach churn.

Expand full comment

I agree. Heather has outdone herself with this inspiring commentary.

Expand full comment

I am so hopeful now! We can do this...it is up to us!

Expand full comment

Marc… Agree 100%. My cousin turned me onto Heather’s writing back in January and it was her letter about Pres. Biden’s speech when he announced he was running again; the Valley Forge speech. When VP Harris becomes POTUS Harris… I hope the next Sec of Education is Heather

Expand full comment

Heather inspires by factual pointing out where we are , where we have been, instilling the HOPE that needs to be brushed off , fluffed up, and proudly flown . It IS our flag of honor. This country is evolving still, a teenager perhaps …having been raised well with goals of equality .

No , we are not there yet, but that determination is what becomes a tad complacent when smooth sailing is apparent and where lurks the ever present deviant and all its off shoots.

They are ,as Heather (and many others) point out , wanting it all for themselves and we want to spread out yet even wider nets of protection.

As the world has seen poverty cut in half, the rise of countries included in ‘talks’ and their growth. Direct points the best drive for those least voices heard….inclusion makes us stronger. It’s proven time after time. And either way -by.the.way. But when voices get silenced it’s the disenfranchised first - and it snowballs quickly….you know the drill! Yes, many are duped, drug into traps of promised solutions that see lost rights, lesser support, and controlling lies.

Together…we.can.do.this ….there’s not been a time so ripe, SISTERS ONE AND ALL, brothers of the feather☮️….let freedom ring loudly with more hands on the bell rope….

💙💙VOTE ALL THE COMPLICIT OUT💙💙

💙💙

Expand full comment

That speech has my vote, Patricia!

Expand full comment

And SO…. We March!!!!!!

Expand full comment

🤣 Thanks, Frank 🫶

Expand full comment

Thomas – interesting. HCR as Sec. of Education. I can't think of a better idea.

Expand full comment

Or a new position. HCR as Secretary of True History. Protect ourselves against false narratives.

Expand full comment

With weekly fireside chats!

Expand full comment

Absolutely!!!!!

Expand full comment

Excellent idea!

Expand full comment

What an exceptionally fitting suggestion!!

Expand full comment

I third that idea; however, I wonder if Heather likes that 💡 idea!

Expand full comment

Great idea! Heather would be wonderful!

Expand full comment

Agreed, a beautiful and powerful piece. My only quibble is over the word "Christian": It seems to me that they are not acting in the spirit of Christ. Is that perception wrong?

Expand full comment

Christian Nationalism is not a religion but a political ideology.

Expand full comment

The radical right wing think tank Heritage Foundation has been undermining democracy since the 1973.......pushing Star Wars missle defence......fighing acid rain legislation......now 2025.

Expand full comment

Yes, it's not just Christian nationalism.... this is a religious / reactionary business coalition.

Expand full comment

The John Birch Society is raising it’s ghastly head…..

There is NOTHING Christian (for me) in christian nationalism…

Expand full comment

The John Birch Society, a truly evil creation...indeed. Brainchild of Fred Koch, father of the diabolical Koch Brothers. Created out of the cloud of hatred for Martin Luther King and the civli rights movement.....Never forget one of the most non-human personalities to walk the earth....Paul Weyrich....major founder of Heritage with funding from Coors.

Jane Mayers "Dark Money"......gives you all the gory details needed

Expand full comment

Megachurch Christofascist attendies happily fill the offering plates to pay for private jets, high class hookers, mansions, million dollar penthouses........

Expand full comment

You might think.... this mega business model though has been going on, very successfully, for a very long time. Occasionally busted by scandals, but often then with comebacks, "God forgives the sinner".... many $$$ is a kinda US mantra anyway. Prosperity Gospel, and you know, you can find antecedents for in the OT, a tad in the NT, just without the Megachurch thing.

Expand full comment

One thing I did forget is the underage girls /boys needed to satisfy the earthly desires of the Megachurch clergy.....

Expand full comment

not just the sprinkling of RC priests then? Oh and what's the sex scandal that just rocked the Southern Baptists ? Rile up some emotions sex is gonna come along for the ride!

Expand full comment

........sadly...as you point out ...hard to keep track of the glorious sex offenders......okay.....RC priests....

some are totaly Orange Jesus supporters........you may be interested in this

https://faithfulamerica.org/

Expand full comment

Since 1948.

Expand full comment

The Christian Nationalists lay a false claim to the word Christian. To them it involves only their offshoot brand of evangelism which teaches and preaches fire and brimstone, fear and hatred for people who don't think, look, and act like themselves. The thinking, speaking, and actions of Jesus don't have anything to do with their movement. Jesus taught inclusion, to turn the other cheek, to feed and clothe those who have less or nothing at all, to heal the sick. He taught peace and love, not hatred and violence. I think a more fitting descriptive word for Christian Nationalists is Brimstonians.

Expand full comment

I like that Mona.... Brimstonians.

Expand full comment

The following is the forward from the podcast: “Charismatic revival Fury: The New Apostolic Reformation” podcast series by Matthew D Taylor:

“Charismatic Revival Fury: The New Apostolic Reformation” is a podcast series on the history of the New Apostolic Reformation with ICJS Protestant scholar Matthew D. Taylor. The series, which is part of the Straight White American Jesus podcast, explores the history of the NAR through its key figures—starting with C. Peter Wagner, then moving to Ché Ahn, Lance Wallnau, Cindy Jacobs, and Dutch Sheets. Along the way, we see how people like Sean Feucht, Gen. Michael Flynn, Doug Mastriano, and others fit into the NAR matrix.

The NAR is the most influential Christian phenomenon that you either haven’t heard of, or don’t understand. It is much discussed, but rarely explored in depth with a scholar’s insight and patience. This series will break down myths and clearly present the origins of the fastest growing component of Christianity in the USA—and maybe the world.

https://icjs.org/charismatic-revival-fury/

Be sure to hear the last 10 minutes of the first episode. I’m almost afraid to listen to the next four.

Expand full comment

This was an excellent - and frightening series. I believe Taylor has written a book about NAR as well. Extremely informative about a phenomenon that few people even know about, but that threatens our democracy right now.

Expand full comment

American Jesus.......wow, what a concept!

Expand full comment

Hm. Sounds very Mormon.

Expand full comment

Thank you Ada

Expand full comment

About it! The rightness of a righteous minority.

Expand full comment

Check out Faithful America.org to see how people of faith are pushing back against Christian Nationalism. It’s heartening to see faith groups rising up much like Martin Luther King did in the 60’s.

Expand full comment

Susan, I'm correcting your link: https://faithfulamerica.org/

Expand full comment

I followed this link and was very impressed. One of my long-standing questions after 2016 is how "good Christians" can support and amoral person like Trump, how enlightening to find Faithful America.

Expand full comment

Above (or below) I requested that Prof. R write "Christian" Nationalism. I have no idea if she reads our posts (she probably doesn't have time!), but I did also want to make that point.

Expand full comment

And espoused my many autocrats worldwide.

Expand full comment

Indeed!!!!

Expand full comment

They are not following the teachings of Christ, but THEY call themselves Christians and want to establish the American Taliban with their Christian Nationalism.

Expand full comment

Christian Nationalism is totally false. Jesus taught to welcome the stranger.....Christian Nationalism teaches deportation camps and mass expulsions

Expand full comment

Given that there is no period at the end of your post, I will finish it: ...mass expulsions based on their sect of Christianity.

It is still a Christian god that they want to promote.

Expand full comment

The tribal god of Abraham, reinterpreted for ignorant Americans.

Expand full comment

If anyone tells me they are a “good Christian”, my reaction is “Shields up”, because if someone has to say it, that’s also a problem.

Expand full comment

You are spot on - these are not Christians. Christ’s teachings called us to love one another. “What you do to the least of my brethren, you do to me.”

Expand full comment

Matthew 7:21-23 (ESV)

22 On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name? ' 23 And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness. '

Expand full comment

Is there a non-psycho babble version of this? Casting out demons sounds pretty out there.

Expand full comment

You need to read some of the stuff they post about what Democrats (they use the moniker DemonicRats and I'm serious) do and what they want to do, with respect especially to "grooming" children. They are stark, staring mad, but they, or many of them, genuinely believe in (or profess to believe in, probably to get money from the gullible who DO believe in) the existence of demons in reality.

Yes, it is out there, but so are they.

Expand full comment

Having been raised by evangelicals who believe in literal, magical “demons,” I am very aware of the level of gullibility and cognitive blind spots necessary to hang on to such nonsense beliefs.

I do not support forcing children into dogmatic indoctrination. Faith-based institutions should not be allowed to teach kids their nonsense. If synagogues, mosques, and churches were legally forbidden to children, religions would die out as they should. There is zero evidence of any gods existence, other than in mass delusions forced into young minds that latch on like a leech and poison billions of minds.

Expand full comment

I just listened to part of Charismatic Revival Fury: The New Apostolic Reformation podcast - I could only listen to a bit. Very informative, but both chilling AND nauseating. I swear, this is the only "movement" in which certifiable whackjobs are trying to convert the rest of the populace to be insane along with them - it's kind of the opposite of confining these poor souls to a safe place in the care of kindly people. And it's allowed to go on, before god and everybody! And people give them money! I'm amazed any of them can dress themselves, or keep themselves clean.

Expand full comment

Stephen I seem to remember that there is an ANTICHRIST idea having to do with the second coming. Basically a false Christ like figure. Personally it seems like just another part of Christian lore. Has it occurred to any of the “Evangelical fundamentalist “ that Trump , who plays the role of the savior of “ Christian values” might be such a figure? It is just that I can’t wrap my head around the idea that these believers in the message of Christ ( like the beatitudes) would bee able to justify supporting him no matter what pet outrage they have that he panders to.

Expand full comment

tRump selling "Bibles" to raise $$$ for himself! He has never read anything and certainly not the Bible. He doesn't read. He spouts.

His MAGA group are Moonies following their cult leader.

Let us not forget the cult supporters. Those who have already inherited great wealth and want to protect it rather then invest it in their childrens future. They think they are going to get to keep it like a pharoah buried with his treasures?

Expand full comment

He has read the works of Hitler.

Expand full comment

George, I’ve long felt and said he’s the anti-Christ. People roll their eyes. Thanks for your comments. He is not to be trusted period.

Expand full comment

. Matthew 24:24

For false messiahs and false prophets will appear, and will produce great signs and wonders in order to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

Expand full comment

Phony as the proverbial two-dollar bill. They prove that with every utterance

Expand full comment

(JD -- I suspect you meant to say "three-dollar bill", as a two-dollar bill is still legal tender. It features Thomas Jefferson. We just don't see them in circulation very often.)

Expand full comment

Damn, a two-dollar bill might be a windfall. But what about a proverbial one. Okay, three will work, hopefully. How about blasphemers? Phony Christians are sinning in the worst way. I’ll just leave money out of it. Hahaha

Expand full comment

Or the one dollar coin.

Expand full comment

I thought about adding that as well. We Americans like our bills, but hate our coins (especially pennies.)

Expand full comment

JD, and they are not only very ugly in their views, but also always looking for something to complain about, so they can paint themselves as victims and keepers of Christianity. Witness the piles of nonsense spewed about the opening of the Olympics.

Expand full comment

Oh, that "interpretation" of the "Last Supper" that had nothing to do with Christianity. I had a friend create a meme that said:

"Everything I don't like is Satanic: A butthurt thumper's guide to the Paris Olympic Games Opening Ceremony"

I will post the less inflammatory one today. It is a "marked safe from" being offended by the Opening Ceremony.

Expand full comment

LOL. These are the same people who see Satan in the taillights of school buses or Jesus in their toast. Just looking to be victims and spread their ignorance. I have seen memes and excellent explanations for what was really going on.

Expand full comment

Very early on, the first generations of Christians struggled with internal conflict, and one of the biggest items was "heretical thinking", with mutual condemnations right up the scale. Paul's letters make this perfectly clear. a purist group surrounded by a world dominated by demonic powers...

Expand full comment

Yes, Frank. The early Church councils were months-long gatherings of leaders who met to grapple with ideas that threatened the burgeoning answers to questions about who God is. No small matter. The Church had grown up because of the teachings of the radical rebel, Jesus of Nazareth, and then was confronted by his execution by the Roman empire and the astounding news that he had been raised from the dead. Many had seen him. (How on earth were church folks to understand THAT?!)

The Council of Nicea in 325 CE, one of the most critical councils, gave us the Nicene Creed, asserting the relationship between the Creator, the Risen One, and the Holy Spirit. The Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE gave us a "formula" that defined the Risen One as not this and not that. In other words, not simply something easy to pinpoint.

What becomes clear is that the theologians of the Church repeatedly chose the more complex answer. Heresy = what is too simplistic. It is more complex to say all human beings are made "in the image of God," for example, than to say that some people matter and other people don't matter. (These leaders were all men but I don't want to dismiss their conclusions because they weren't feminists. I am interested in the ideas rather than the gender of the deciders.)

If ideas about God are too simple, they're probably unhelpful and even more likely harmful. Witness: White Nationalism. It's not Christian.

Expand full comment

I've always felt that both the bible itself and the various Creeds imposed over time upon Christ's teachings (whatever they were) are classic examples of "decision by committee", and have been as credible, sensible, workable and effective as such decisions usually are. You only have to look at the Crusades to see how effective the conclusions of these various committees have been.

Expand full comment

MAGA is certainly a crusade. They can’t wait to start the inquisition phase.

Expand full comment

They are just waiting, the revenge squad

Expand full comment

I've got news for you, Melinda, God is made in the image of People. How's that for simplicity? And heresy, too. This idea is simple AND helpful. It clears everything up. Take a person, any person. Make that person God or godlike: you get instant fascism of all kinds, including kings, priests, white nationalists, MAGA, cults, gangs and so on. All are based on erroneous definitions and false authority. That's why so much harm has been done in the name of religion, and why the founders insisted on keeping it out of government. We the People have got this, assuming truth remains the highest mandate, and lies the ultimate heresy. We let down our guard and now we have an Internatioinal Nazi movement to eliminate. It never should have happened in the first place. Lessons must be learned and relearned. It's just human. And the millions upon millions killed in 20th century wars were not sentenced to death by any god. Only man, and woman, can pull that off.

Expand full comment

Thank you, James. That we shape God or gods according to what we can understand or want is certainly true. The deal with that Jesus figure, however, is that he challenges that tendency. He didn't engage in retribution or use force to take power or manipulate people. He blessed them. That instead of violence, he let himself be sacrificed is a mighty challenge to us self-protective humans.

Expand full comment

A vast network of churches has been built on the 'Jesus figure', entirely political in nature and dependent upon the psyche. His story held out no deals concerning God. That idea is set in stone: God is the authority that permits 'retribution or force to take power or manipulate people' 'according to what we can understand or want'. God's mercy is just another myth, a false claim of salvation. Jesus may have blessed the people. He may have been a pacifist. He may have sacrificed himself or simply been murdered. But the imaginary authority vested in 'God' by people of all faiths is the root of all error, all evil. I say this from the political perspective, not the psychological perspective, which is the proper province of all religion. Authority is vested in the people, exclusively. We make of it what we will.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that, my readings are more discursive, but I can follow your gist. Bart Ehrman put it Christian theology become more paradoxical (complex) as time went on. A lot, if not all Christians had trouble making sense of the Trinity, figuring out how to maintain a monotheistic religion, based on Judaism, while espousing a "Son of God" which is both distinct and subsumed within the "Godhead" . Then add in the holy spirit, and make that distinct force/companion? which reaches into human beings, those fallen creatures, and that is also part of the Godhead. Before it got so complicated, Paul would write, at least once, he didn't always know where he left off and Christ began within himself. When Christianity became legal, a variety of competing views were circulating about all this, one in particular, namesaked after Arius turned into one major multi-generational battle. It was never really resolved. Unable to be suppressed, missionaries took it to the Goths, and it spread widely, lasting for centuries. A lot of people were not happy with Chalcedon, which was imposed with the force of law, theological splits over that continue to this very day. Jews never took to any of this, and when Muslims came along, they regarded themselves as reformers of Judaism and Christianity as a form of polytheism. Much later, didn't Luther dread possible divisions over the doctrine of the Trinity as a potential nightmare? Pentecostals are very interesting, I believe the most dynamic development in modern Christianity, and they quite literally connect to being possessed by the holy spirit, speaking in tongues, to wit, Paul's references in first Corinthians. I don't think simple vs complex does this stuff justice. It's more about human beings unable to agree among themselves over a subject which has no clear terms of reference but seems very important to them. Turf matters! There is a reason the Royal Society of London excluded discussions about theology/religion when trying to work up a coherent, empirically based view of things, right? For the last 5 centuries, this has been the best scoring game in town when it comes to sorting out realities which dedicated scientific societies can agree upon. Well, forgive my meanderings. I cannot fathom the technicalities of my daughters' phd science theses, but i presume to mull over unsolved epistemological issues, science has truly left us "in media res" instead of greater certainties, holy smokes, but what a view! Must run

Expand full comment

Internal conflict is still their go it, EXCEPT when a church official abuses some congregant. Then it's unite and bar the door. Example; Gateway Church in Dallas. How many years did it take for a tad of accountability.

Expand full comment

I have spent too many hours pondering the motivation of the Evangelicals or White Christian Nationalists at times so put-off by their anti-Christian behaviors I called it the white Faux-Christian Nationalists movement. They are a cult that spews the same vile hate as most of the Republican Party and the Southern Baptist Convention and much of the Catholic Church in America.

But, if we dwell on these faux-religious organizations, aren't we giving a pass to the fact that MAGA, which is SUPPOSED to mean Make America Great Again has accomplished ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT!!!

The media focuses on one or two bizarre things that convicted felon Donald Trump said in the last few days or even something JD Vance said five years ago.

But do they ever focus on the fact that CFDT accomplished zero, nada, zilch to make America great. The list of things the Republicans since 2016, like reversing Roe, that absolutely DIDN'T make America great, is too voluminous to list.

It would be like analyzing each of CFDT's tweets for his four years, which are almost always aimed at name calling someone or some group, or praising an authoritarian world leader for some heinous act.

Maybe it's time we attack CFDT and the so-called MAGAs for accomplishing so little since CFDT came down the faux-gold elevator in 2015.

Expand full comment

We need to make America Intelligent Again! MAIA! hahahaha

Expand full comment

I have a hat that says just that! I wore it while canvassing for Dems this past weekend

Expand full comment

You're correct, Gary. But maybe there should be an honest, side-by-side comparison of the accomplishments of both #45 and #46, in categorical format (Economy, Health Care, Military/Defense, Education, Poverty, Business, National Debt/Deficit, etc.) I think the differences would be starkly illustrative.

Expand full comment

I like that idea. But wouldn't the sides be lopsided since the Biden administration has accomplished so much and the DonOld administration so little? But maybe if you listed Biden's accomplishments vs Trump's failures they might even out.

Expand full comment

Gary, I prefer to view Trump and his cultists as those who have awakened US to Become Great by renewing our committment to democracy. Perhaps this is all part of God's plan for US to lead in saving humanity.. If so, She surely scared the bejesus into me and many others.

Expand full comment

"Maybe it's time we attack CFDT and the so-called MAGAs for accomplishing so little since CFDT came down the faux-gold elevator in 2015." Some people descend into Hell upon their deaths. CFDT descended by elevator, and it's been hell ever since.

Expand full comment

They point to Dobbs reversal, tax cuts for cretins, and the renewed dominance of the church. And the piece de resistance, concentration camps for immigrants, but room for anybody else they want to lock up.

Expand full comment

Stephen, I am a Christian. I am even an “evangelical” Christian. As much as these supposed “Christians” like the Turning Point conference ones disgust and infuriate the rest of you, they disgust and infuriate me a million times more. They are wolves in sheep’s clothing. What has happened in much of American Christianity is an obscenity as well as an absurdity. To think that one Christian person, much less all these “Christian leaders”(your dad is looking down from heaven in shame Franklin Graham!) could ever support and vote for that vile, vulgar, immoral, corrupt and repulsive person, has shaken me. Christians have sold their souls for political power to stop abortion I guess??? To keep drag shows out of schools??? To hate immigrants??? R’s are good (even Trump!!!), D’s are not just bad, they are evil, and that is it. Fox News has not helped. It is a cancer on the country, and it has infected millions. The culture of cruelty and dishonesty among the supposed “Moral Majority”(in quotes for a reason) has been shocking and it is so wrong, and yes, I believe sinful.

When we call evil, good(Trump!!!) and good, evil(free lunches for children!), we are lost. I pray for a miracle this fall, not just at the ballot box, but in the heart and minds of decent people. All these millions for Trump are not all Stephen Miller or Steve Bannon or the other repulsive human beings we see up front. I cannot see after 10 years what would ever shake folks out of this cult, but I still pray the scales will fall from their eyes……..

Expand full comment

Thanks for your report "from the inside" and for your identification of this phenomenon as an obscenity; I had thought "blasphemy" was closer, but to some degree, obscenity also fits.

Expand full comment

Ally, it IS blasphemy, but I decided that was a little too “theological.” It is for sure both blasphemy and an obscenity, and this unimaginable support of the antichrist(only kidding, or am I??)has driven me to depression and almost despair, it really has.

Expand full comment

Blasphemy isn't too theological, IMO. It is exactly right. These individuals are whited sepulchres, have become so through belief in mammon and earthly power, are corruption beneath a micrometer-thick skin of paint (well, in the tRampler's case, it's much thicker than a micrometer, but you know what I mean).

Expand full comment

I can only imagine. As a non-theist, it is an academic concern. I know that there are Christians who are in your same position.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing that Rick. My sisters are both church-going practicing Christians. They raised their children to be Christians and they all are in a sense, followers of Christ's teachings. However, out of my 8 nieces and nephews three of them attend church on a regular basis. The other's don't attend and are non-theists or agnostics. I'm not sure why.

Fewer and fewer people attend church on a regular basis and yet it seems that there are more "kind" people that I run across regardless of their politics or religion. Maybe it's just that I'm older and people tend to treat older people with respect and kindness. I have no way of knowing.

Both of my sisters have talked about how Trump and his cult have torn their churches apart. I'm not sure that their are any winners when this happens especially if the church folds as a result. I really hate Trump and the entire Republican Party for that.

I am a non-theist but I try to follow Jesus's teaching because his lessons are timeless and good.

Expand full comment

Of the "righteous" in my family, I count two who I consider legit. The rest, not so much

Expand full comment

I pray for your prayer

Expand full comment

I call them x-tians because there is no Christ in them.

Expand full comment

No the American Taliban, which is what they are, are not Christian. They embrace a false white gospel, which is the complete opposite of the love that Jesus taught. Jesus explained many times that he was not a political leader. Even today they don't listen.

Expand full comment

And don't forget misogyny. I'm no Biblical scholar, but the fact that Jesus had close friendships with women, was visited while on the cross by women, and a woman was the first to see the resurrected Christ, I think that asking for women's subservience is unchristian.

Expand full comment

Amen, sister! To paraphrase Nadia Bolz Weber, when the disciples went to the tomb, they saw laundry. When Mary Magdalene went, she saw Christ.

Expand full comment

Stephen, "Christian" can be whatever one wants it to be. The founders realized that religion has no more a place in government than kings do. Democracy is based on only one fundamental meaning.

Expand full comment

No it is not.

Expand full comment

Stephen. I agree 100%. I don’t think the christian nationalist know that christian is from the person of Jesus the Christ. It actually gets my dander up when I hear them use that name😡

Expand full comment

The spirit of Christ in a nice aspiration.

The reality is the biblical god, full of hate and spite and retribution.

They are certainly the children of that god

Expand full comment

Read Psalm 23. This is a translation published in "The Message," a responsible work by Eugene Peterson, Presbyterian minister, scholar, theologian who sought contemporary language for the ideas in the Bible.

God, my shepherd!

I don’t need a thing.

You have bedded me down in lush meadows,

you find me quiet pools to drink from.

True to your word,

you let me catch my breath

and send me in the right direction.

Even when the way goes through

Death Valley,

I’m not afraid

when you walk at my side.

Your trusty shepherd’s crook

makes me feel secure.

You serve me a six-course dinner

right in front of my enemies.

You revive my drooping head;

my cup brims with blessing.

Your beauty and love chase after me

every day of my life.

I’m back home in the house of God

for the rest of my life.

Expand full comment

I'm glad if this brings you comfort.

There is no god to do any of this, and I've read this thing in its many translations.

Still doesn't make it true. Dangerous nonsense.

Children should never be indoctrinated with this garbage.

Expand full comment

None of the Abrahamic offshoots are anything other than a dangerous distraction from solving humanity's problems.

Expand full comment

Personally I think that's true of every patriarchal religion. Only one worth a damn is Wicca, and it's like.

Expand full comment

It strikes me as relevant that Wiccans have never knocked on my door peddling their beliefs. I have never seen a Wiccan carrying a bullhorn and a giant sign about my eternal damnation should I fail to bow to their way of thinking. I wonder why that is?

Expand full comment

She's knocking on our climate at the moment so very busy.

Expand full comment

Major difference between:

A) the Old Testament God: ”eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth”, or “thou shalt not suffer a witch in o live”, &

B) the New Testament Christ’s much more modern game theory: “turn the other cheek” or, “ love thy neighbor” or, ”greater love hath no man than this, that he lay his life down for another”.

Christianity is a radical New Testament story, and in a one sentence summary, it points to a more sophisticated conflict response, & identifies a superior game theory for modern conflicts, than “hitting back” (when increasingly many parties have or soon will have, WMD).

Similarly contra-posed are followers of Christ and followers of Trump.

Oil and water.

Expand full comment

If you have Amazon Prime watch God and Country. That documentary portrays Christian Nationalism as the political party that it is.

Expand full comment

The Christian Nationalists have little to do with Christ and lots to do with power. Check out Faithful America.org

Expand full comment

You're not wrong. It isn't in the spirit of Christ. It's political, using Christianity as a cover.

Expand full comment

There is nothing Christian about them. Christianity has driven much of the suffering in this world. It is a cover for power hungry, grievance driven control freaks. We must fight against it!!

Expand full comment

Now with this specific And significant change in American politics and the fire in the people, it is time to take on a new mission. I would suggest the following: “END EXPLOITATION NOW! .”

Expand full comment

Yes!!!!

Expand full comment

Maybe best ever..tho have thought that other times, I have sat with your closing words, Heather, for several hours. Now I firmly believe this letter is maybe the best, and certainly most impactful.

Expand full comment

Dammit, I'm crying again. Ok, actually bawling. Yes, the best one yet. Everything is there: the connection to our nation's history, to our personal history, as Americans, of getting up and DOING when the going gets tough, and the call to never, ever, give up, to always be our best selves. So long as we persevere and work together for ALL of us, we can do it!

Expand full comment

I’m with you, Marc. God knows that Heather has been a beaming beacon in all of our lives over these last few years, but today is message could be one of her best and most important statements to the country.

Thank you, Heather!

Expand full comment

I just forwarded this to my usual list plus two new friends and posted it on Facebook. Beautifully stated and today I am going to take a walk in the forest with my dog, Farley, come back to the cabin and write postcards with Field Team 6. “America is the only country founded on an idea.” Make democracy an action word.

Expand full comment

Agreed, Marc! This was a gem.

Expand full comment

For the first time in a long time, I’m feeling hopeful. What an inspirational read!

Expand full comment

Barnburner for me! I've seen a lot of good ones gotta say!

Expand full comment

Yes, lit a fire under my fat, aged pizatts. 😇

Expand full comment

Do I hear Pulitzer (?) 🤓💯👍✔️💪👊

Expand full comment

Agreed…. I want to frame it and hang it on every wall…..🎶👏🏻🥰

Expand full comment

I agree 100%!

Expand full comment

I agree. And I am in tears.

Expand full comment

I love how Dr. Richardson reminds us that it has always been up to us. We must try to make the periods between our forgetfulness shorter and shorter. I wonder if the joy cycle runs similarly- we feel joy in being ourselves and being together, then accept the shame put onto that joy by those who would take power, then remember it again. May we hold on to this period of joy for as long as it takes!

Expand full comment

We can never let our guard down or the evil of greedy people wanting to take over will rise up.

Expand full comment

“The price of apathy is to be ruled by greedy men.” Plato

Expand full comment

Linda. FOR EVER PEACE, Joy and DEMOCRACY

Expand full comment

It's OUR work and it's OUR business.

Politicians, elected officials and civil servants are the help we hire to facilitiate that, but a significant part of the problems we face today comes from failing to properly supervise these people we've deputised to accomplish our work. Over time, they've come to consider themselves to be special; that there's a "Political Class" and instead of seeing themselves as public servants their attitude becomes aristocratic.

That's contrary to our original principles. The notion never quite goes away, tho.

Expand full comment

Citizens United is the accelerant.

Expand full comment

Citizens United, Holder v. Shelby, Dobbs, and Trump. All of them together comprise the greatest assault on our democracy since… well, forever.

Expand full comment

You can thank conservative Court for that! SCOTUS needs reform. 4 moderate liberals right off.

Expand full comment

This is not a conservative court but a radical right wing authoritarian, power grabbing misogynist court, legislating from the bench.

Expand full comment

It’s a capital C Conservative, not a small c conservative. That puts it in the tradition of the John Birch Society and William F. Buckley. Those Conservatives who, heedless of the warning one of their own, Barry Goldwater, embraced the Southern Strategy and fused their antisocial and regressive economic ideas with the culture of the Confederacy and the Bible Belt, creating a coalition capable of winning elections. When they captured the white working class under Nixon, they became very, very powerful. Watergate slowed them, but they came back stronger with St. Ronald Reagan. Obama shook them up, but they responded with the Tea Party, and then Trump. All the while The Heritage Foundation pursued Operation REDMAP to capture statehouses and packed the Courts with their acolytes.

Expand full comment

All results of the kind of political thinking that caught fire during and after the Civil Rights movement began having an actual effect on people's lives.

Expand full comment

Money and politics become intertwined and result in a power hungry class attempting to take over. We will not stand for it..

Expand full comment

We will be forced to “stand for it” until we “do something” about campaign finance. We can easily “outspend” the plutocrats with a relatively inexpensive campaign finance voucher program. We do not need a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. Just a little donor power in the hands of all voters. See Seattle or the fibustered HR1 For The People Act. Read my Substack posts on the subject

Expand full comment

An eternal tension between elites /leaders and the masses / general public. Elites have generally considered themselves as "betters". And ever here the joke about the guy walking into a roomful of senators where each person thought he was the "smartest man" in the room.... an old joke, it was all about men.

Expand full comment

Possibly, early on in the country, it wasn't unreasonable for farmers, merchants, educators, etc. (and their wives, but we really didn't count officially - thanks, John Adams, for failing to consider the ladies) to trust the elected representatives to get on with the task and do it honestly and honorably without being micromanaged. Welp, things have changed. What a pain - as if we don't have enough to do, what with working, raising families, etc., but we also have to ride herd on our elected representatives every minute as if they are just more two-year-olds who can't be trusted not to throw their Cheerios onto the floor. I want to elect responsible grownups who can do their own jobs properly - REPRESENT! Vote Blue!

Expand full comment

And that they always leave office with a great deal of money. That money isn’t from the people, it is from lobbyists with deep pockets, funded by the corporations and 1%. They work for the money, not for the people, in order to keep their jobs. The Uber rich do not pay taxes they pay congress. How do we change that?

Expand full comment

I like your line that "the Uber rich do not pay taxes, they pay congress". Well said!!

Expand full comment

Inspired and inspiring, Gary - super well observed !!!

Expand full comment

I'm not sure that I follow your train of thought, Gary. Can you be more specific, with some concrete examples?

Expand full comment

Take MA, a reputedly "blue" state. The Dems' platform is very progressive. We've had universal health care in our platform since at least 1997. But it's 2024, and once again, the Legislature has failed to pass single payer. My town of 10,000 would have saved $2,000,000 (yes, that's two million dollars) this past year in health insurance costs, but our legislators belong to the insurance companies and Big Pharma. They hold many of their votes in secret and thus avoid individual responsibility. Ask most voters, and they will tell you that they are happy with their legislators, legislators who consistently refuse to pass legislation that would afford us greater transparency if we wanted to follow their votes. I'm not sure if that's what Gary meant, but it's what I thought of when I read his post and then your question, Richard. I hope that that helps.

Expand full comment

I agree, as in North Carolina, a purple state with a GOP lead General Assembly holding a surplus of over 2 Billion dollars which would benefit all if used correctly. Their solution is to use some for school vouchers for all citizens with children, regardless of income and let the public school system suffer. This is not acceptable, only in November will there possibly be a change.

Expand full comment

The quality of our public schools must be top priority. Our future aspirations and achievements should not be left to the economic hierarchy of private schools.

Expand full comment

In hundreds of school districts across the country public schools are the main focus and receive the bulk of the property tax dollars.

My daughter attended public schools in NE, FL and ME and had some wonderful teachers in all three states. Some were rural districts and some urban. But they all had competent school boards that cared about the education of the kids in their community.

But, many districts do not have the money to hire or retain good teachers or administration. Many of these districts still do an amazing job in spite of this.

Unfortunately, many don't. And often times it's only a few noisy nutcases, that try to force their far right ideology on their district by questioning topics in textbooks, banning books and banning free speech. They penalize teachers for saying "the wrong thing" or teaching from the wrong book, media, etc.

There are many people that post here that are life long educators that can better speak to this topic, and I truly thank you for your service to the families where you taught.

Expand full comment

When did your daughter go to PS in FL???? They no longer have books in their school librabries!!

Expand full comment

Really? She graduated from Ponte Vedra High School in 2014.

So, the students can check out books on their I-Pads or laptops now?

How do the elementary kids learn to read and write now?

Expand full comment

NC deserves better. Is Art Pope still pouring big bucks into the Repub coffers

Expand full comment

Only “big” because so few regular folk contribute campaign funds. Campaign finance vouchers would put “big” donors in their proper place. Please read and comment on my Substack posts on this subject

Expand full comment

I used to contribute much more. As a recent widow, I pay a schittload of taxes because Elon and Jeff don't. We "regular folk" could use a few loopholes.

Expand full comment

JD: When I read this response and read your self-description it suddenly felt personal.

In 2016, I worked as a campaign volunteer (even tried door to door stuff that turned out to be too hard for me because I am partially disabled). I was not shocked by Trump's victory because I saw a disconnect between Democratic complacency and his supporter's responses. I have been interested in campaign finance vouchers since early in the 2020 campaign. I got as involved as I could in the 2022 midterms as my wife recovered from a crisis. But in 2022 I turned my attention (to the degree caregiving allowed) pretty much full time to analyzing how vouchers should be considered. People advised me to divide my writing into smaller chunks, so I turned to Substack. My main concepts are out there now. But it appears we got Tea Party and Trump as a side effect of the 2008 financial crisis and its slow recovery. So, I began to wonder: Can it happen again? Have we done enough to prevent another 2008?

My conclusion: Not hardly. In particular, we have done virtually NOTHING to prevent the ACTUAL cause of the crisis: a "run" on short-term loans/deposits, like "repo" and money market funds that shut down commercial credit and, with that, normal business activity. That is more accurate than the usual surface explanations about a few billion dollars of bad mortgage loans created by crooked banks (the kind of foolishness we see fairly often, such as the Fed's easy money reversal tipping over banks like Silicon Valley Bank).

Leading to the next question: If the money-printing actions of the Fed and half-baked fiscal policy response by Congress got us (eventually) out of 2008, would the same combination work for the next financial crisis? My tentative answer: We seem to be in a significantly worse place than we were in 2009 when the Fed and Obama tried to organize a joint monetary and fiscal response.

If Harris wins, we might have a rational fiscal response. But there is a potential fly in the monetary ointment: We have a serious problem with deficit spending. Those deficits raise doubts about the usefulness of "the mighty dollar" as a means to money-print our way out of a crisis. And, despite the overwhelming success of the fiscal spending response in getting our economy going after to the Covid recession, those same deficits could be used to cripple a response. Crippled by big money donors in our highly partisan, winner-take-all, care-nothing-about-mere-voters, only-donors-count Congress.

Our basic personal income system is reasonably progressive. It has some provisions to benefit those with the least income. Those with the least income are usually net recipients versus payers. From what I have read (not an expert) I think one could argue that the biggest source of our deficits is our system of tax expenditures (AKA "loopholes") that mostly benefit the upper 20%. Especially the upper 1% to 10%.

There are serious danger signs tied to those deficits.

Our too-big-to-fail-or-save banks (ok, bank holding companies) seem to be seriously insolvent, burdened by holdings of low-interest bonds (being protected by accounting systems that do not require that their low value be reported at true market value) and growing piles of rapidly defaulting commercial real estate loans. If something pushed them, could we have another "run" on short term finance ("repo," commercial paper, money-market funds, etc.) like 2008? Answer: Yes. If so, would the world respond if the Fed decided to "print" money to make loans like it did in 2009. Or would our huge deficits make them hesitate, fearing a US dollar default on its trillions of bonds?

We desperately need a working Congress that can tackle these deficits. Even if it requires higher taxes on the not-so-rich (despite Biden's promises to not do so). Along with other critical issues such as climate change and ....

We didn't have a working Congress in 2009 and it took 8 years to slowly emerge from 2008. Giving us Trump. Another Great Recession might bring much worse than Trump.

That is why I am spending all my available time working on pushing campaign finance vouchers - I think they are key to unlocking a working Congress.

But approval of a voucher program is only likely if pushed by leaders who are honest about how tied they have been the current money system. The Democrats did quietly try in 2022 with HR1 -For the People Act. But much too quietly - almost no one, not even me who had been urging vouchers for 5 years, knew those provisions were in the bill. In 2020 some presidential candidates suggested vouchers, but so quietly no one (even their own volunteers) knew it.

If Harris really wants to draw attention to something that would make sense to voters, propose a solution to campaign finance AND then decline to take any money from the big banks.

Expand full comment

Good idea. But, as you say, we need a working congress.

Expand full comment

Yes, I believe so or his ‘buds’

Expand full comment

USA has the largest per capita health costs in the OECD by far, about $14K vs $8k in eg Canada, with a public health system, and is well down the list in health outcomes overall. ikely because it is a private profit based system, leaving many Americans unable to afford private health care costs. Gentrification writ large. Affordable health care, Medicaid has been an attempt to address this. Just the same, about 26 million Americans remain uninsured.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Betsy. And, I think that you've nailed the issue - money. Money buying votes.

Expand full comment

Not regular money as we know it- GREAT WEALTH buys votes and congress and SPOTUS. Humongous acculmulations of billions that the owners do not want to pay taxes for.

"Money" for most people is what we use to buy groceries, clothes, vacations somethimes.

Expand full comment

Recent report, this past week: 800 Americans have as much wealth as one-half of the American population. This is a huge cancer growing on the body politic.

Expand full comment

Right off the top of my head, look into Schlesinger's "The Imperial Presidency", and the recent SCOTUS decision on presidential immunity.

Some of our more egotistical leaders (Nixon, for example) wanted fancier trappings associated with the office. Trimp wanted a military march similar to Russia's Mayday parade thru D.C. on the 4th of July with him prominently reviewing the troops.

It starts at the top but it extends to the bottom: think of Huey Long or the system someone like TV's Boss Hogg represents. Eventually considering political professionals aseparate class leads to feudalism and a rigidly tiered society.

Contrast that with say, George Washington willingly handing his presidency to a successor, and leaving government to be a private citizen again.

Expand full comment

Some of Nixon's wannabe "Imperial Guard" Secret Service uniforms ended up being sold for $5 (or $10 each in the case of the Meriden-Cleghorn High School Band Uniforms), in Marcus, Iowa per https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/news/pomp-and-circumstance

Expand full comment

Exactly!!!

Expand full comment

"Every time we expand democracy, it seems we get complacent, thinking it’s a done deal. We forget that democracy is a process and that it’s never finished. And when we get complacent, people who want power use our system to take over the government."

I do not think it was about getting complacent about expanding and preserving our democracy. I think it was about losing sight of an essential lesson/tactic of the Civil Rights movement - that progress is made by taking power at the ballot box. So while the Left perpetuated the tradition of uniting in protest, voting became seen as an individual exercise in personal expression instead of a joint exercise in taking power. While many on the Left split away chasing purity tests, pipe dreams, and Pied Pipers, those on the Right focused on uniting to take power through the electoral system - volunteering, running, and voting as Republicans.

In 2020, Rep. Jim Clyburn stepped up to unite Democratic candidates and voters behind Joe Biden. Now while Nancy Pelosi provided the impetus for Biden to step down, Clyburn has been instrumental in motivating Democrats to unite behind Kamala Harris.

A problem remains on Left, with potential Democratic voters hardened into the false rhetoric of 'the duopoly' and dug into a 'never will I ever' stance - indifferent to the risks of helping elect Trump, again, or perhaps worse, glad of abetting Trump's destructive acts in order to 'teach Democrats a lesson.'

Expand full comment

Exactly, such as the third-party deluded

Expand full comment

We desperately NEED third parties. Our laws make that impossible. We need a responsible middle of the road Republican Party. And a radical left party separate from central democrats.

“Fusion voting” as advocated by Lee Drutman’s substack would bring that on. And with it the return of compromise legislation.

Meanwhile campaign finance vouchers would help

Expand full comment

What we need is a greater diversity of voices - of candidates and voters. The most direct route to that is Ranked Choice Voting. This Instant Runoff system is the most efficient way to reform our electoral system. Efficiently winnowing a multitude of candidates to guarantee a majority win victor.

Even in parliamentary systems a multitude of parties can lead to unstable strange bedfellow coalitions and to paralysis. Better to have voters make the compromises at the ballot box by ranking their choice of candidates than party representatives making backroom deals while government hangs in abeyance.

The stakes are too high to split the vote with ego driven campaigns by self promoters (and the people who love them) who show up once every four years to grab the golden ring of the presidency. And who otherwise have shown little interest and less success in building any new party from the ground up.

Expand full comment

I have not spent a LOT of my energy thinking about proposals to modify election laws. I deeply respect Lee Drutman, who has. I was impressed by the use of RCV in Alaska. But Drutman says fusion voting (which was legal everywhere until the 2 parties disliked the competition and got it banned in early 20th century) is common internationally and helps explain the common existence of multiple parties. The waste a vote and simply-cause-chaos effect of JFK jr and Nader are reflections of the poor state of our laws (including banning of fusion voting). Fusion voting allows parties to work together and encourages compromise without hiding strong disagreements on policy

Expand full comment

Sure we do, but we need to change a few laws first. Otherwise we get the worst of the worst.

Expand full comment

With either Democrat or Republican it’s that us verses them vitriol.That’s not working.To re establish our democracy I think we have to go with the fringe people who are supporting the only unbeholden candidate- RFKJR.

Expand full comment

No way. His beliefs on vaccines alone frighten me!!

Expand full comment

He’s a horrid choice! His own family members are against him running. They backed Biden but now back Harris. What do you have against her, John?

Expand full comment

She is beholden to the Democratic Party that is beholden to the wealthy and the corporations. Which are controlling our government and transferring the wealth created by the middle class upward.

Expand full comment

We also cannot count on the press to get the message out. They have their own agenda and it has nothing to do with responsibly covering this election.

Expand full comment

"Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate to prefer the latter."

Thomas Jefferson

Expand full comment

The Founding Fathers envisioned things differently than they are turning out.

Expand full comment

The Founding Fathers were using single shot muskets that took time to load.

Democracy/Freeedom haters and underminers allow AR15 assault guns to be in teenage hands......when childrens bodies are indentified by they shoes.....they send thoughts and prayers.

Expand full comment

Thanks, WJB. I use the "ID via high tops" occasionally when discussing the horrors of gun violence; inevitably, one of my MAGAt acquaintances will say "Huh?"

Expand full comment

Cherry picking Jefferson out of context to authorize your biases is dishonest. In the quote you mangle and misappropriate, you misrepresent Jefferson's meaning - which he makes clear in the parts you left out. Jefferson was writing explicitly of government protections for freedom of speech and government limitations on censorship of newspapers - and also by implication in support of government funded public education.

The full quote:

"The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, & to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers & be capable of reading them."

Thomas Jefferson

The full letter:

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-11-02-0047

Expand full comment

“every man should receive these papers and be capable of reading them”

Implication: since newspapers are nearly dead because their business model is dead, we need a “news voucher” program so every citizen has a little money to buy access to legitimate news

Expand full comment

That is a stretch. I would suggest a more clear reading - 'that every man be capable of receiving papers' means that government limit its power to censor the news and 'that every man be capable of reading them' means government investment in literacy.

Expand full comment

Stretch? Maybe so.

But the point I'm "stretching" for is that Jefferson clearly counted on the press being capable of reaching the citizens. I think it is safe to argue that the primary press does not reach much of our population. At least not the way it did for most of my life (as a side effect of the advertising function). Is that a problem? I suspect it is. Certainly, the journalism profession seems to think so.

Would a press voucher help? Maybe. Worth discussion, I think.

And, or course, I'm sure he would be in favor of literacy.

Expand full comment

Absolutely correct

Expand full comment

@ Rhea Graham. It's our public duty. Plus it's gestalt therapy.

When you join the “Women for Harris National Organizing Call,” please ask them to partner with FT 6. Millions of unregistered folk trend Democratic. Register Democrats to save the world.

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

BTW there's a White dudes for Harris 8:00 p.m. ET. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfv8CbvFVggb-D6bQ1-oPUNULwk6f1qzkjufYGIWFiCQ0Z8RA/viewform

Expand full comment

Daniel Solomon and

Rhea Graham.......YES!!!!

REGISTER DEMOCRATS AND MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A RIDE TO THEIR VOTING LOCATIONS!!!!

Expand full comment

Last night on Focus for Democracy people pledged millions to two underfunded groups, Galvanize and Accelerate Change.

Expand full comment

I have written 600 postcards from FieldTeam6 - I have freinds who have been waiting weeks for their FT6 postcards. Have they run out? Problems with handling all the requests? FT6 has fallen behind on the requests for post cards. Also- all our local post offices are out of post card stamps AND USPS has not been able to fulfill our order for stamps. Hmmmmm

Expand full comment

Order postcard stamps from the USPS website. They arrive in a few days. I order them in 100-stamp rolls and have written, stamped, and mailed about 6,000 postcards supporting Democratic issues and field teams in the past 3 years.

https://www.usps.com

Expand full comment

Gee, I wonder why you can't get postcard stamps...

Expand full comment

Yes it is up to us; as one of my College Professors used to say "we get the Government we deserve ". That's what Democracy is all about. It's up to we,the people,to elect the Government we deserve.

Expand full comment

Unless SPO(OIL)TUS interferes as they did with Gore vs W.

Gore won and SPO(OIL)TUS illegally voted twice and gave us to W.

We must remember to be more attentive and smarter to judicial appointments.

Expand full comment

Money tips the scales, significantly these days.

Expand full comment

As long as you have political organization and leadership/followings to make that happen. Without organization, nothing changes.

Expand full comment

It always HAS been up to US and now we are rising to meet the challenge. I have hope in America again. People aren't just doing their own thing, they see the challenge and are rising to it. They are feeling their power and are using it—to have a democracy. How wonderful it is.

Expand full comment

Rhea Graham, Yes! And tens of millions of our fellow Americans agree with you, as they stepped forward in an explosive wave of support to shoulder that burden in solidarity with Vice President Harris, as she seeks the presidency. The change in mood in the country brought by the prospect of Kamala Harris as our next President has been like waking from a nightmare. Now's the time to do the work to make that happen!

Expand full comment

Absolutely, Rhea. We have to let go of the notion that we can tune in once every four years and call it good. Jon Stewart, love em or hate em, put it well when he said "democracy is a lunch pail #@#$&( job" !

Expand full comment

Thank you, Rhea. Concisely, crushingly, compellingly transparent.

Expand full comment

It's always been our job. Thank you for the reminder!

Expand full comment

Facts, Reality, Hope & Freedom❗️

"We are not Going Back"

Expand full comment

Lenin put it well in 1917: "Sometimes decades happen in weeks."

What we are experiencing since last Sunday morning has never happened before in American political history. If the word "revolutionary" is defined as "Being or bringing about a big or important change," we are in a revolutionary situation.

I worked in the Obama campaign beginning in 2007, and what I experienced then - which felt like nothing before - is not close to what is going on now.

AOC warned the week before Biden withdrew that those pushing him out also wanted to push out VP Harris. That didn't happen, because the Democratic base - Us! - rose up and said No! We made sure it would be Kamala, and in the past week, the elites are responding to us. Each of them could say what French politician Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin once said: "There go the people. I must follow them, for I am their leader."

I really believe this is "the American Spring." Unlike The Arab Spring, or the "democratic revolutions" at the outset of the French and Russian Revolutions - which were overthrown by the "revolutionaries" who couldn't deliver anything but a new tyranny - we have a good chance of success because there is now only 99 days left. That’s not enough time for the "professionals" to screw up and abort things.

This is a bottom-up movement.

We have Gen Z creators making memes that are playing to young people and activating them. On Sunday night, 45,000 black women came together and created a movement. The next night, 45,000 black men followed their example, followed each night after by Asian Americans, LGBTQ American, Latino Americans, White American Women. Tomorrow, White Dudes for Kamala is meeting, and Women for Harris will come into existence.

Those zoom meetings are our version of the "peoples' assemblies" that brought forth the democratic revolutions in 1789 and 1917 and 2011. Over 100,000 people have signed up as volunteers to work in the election. Most of them have never done such a thing before.

My politics have remained what they began as 60 years ago: I am a "participatory democracy radical." I think we are in the midst of what I've been hoping for all of those 60 years. What we have to do to make this happen is PARTICIPATE.

Expand full comment

I think your last sentence says it all, TC. I have been waiting also. In a way, Alito and the rest of the band of Injustices, did us a favor. They exposed themselves to us. They are a part of a big plot of extremists ( I won’t even call them Christian nationalists because that would be too kind.) to rip our freedoms away. As a whole, I think we thought we were powerless, that our backs were against the wall. We were at a pivotal point when our beloved Joe couldn’t get his words out. We were alarmed. But like a Phoenix rising, Joe gave us the ultimate gift by becoming the sacrificial lamb. He lifted Kamala up for everyone to see, to get excited about. I am excited! I participated in the White Women’s event and I plan on breaking the Internet again with tomorrow’s event which will include all of our sisters. We have to trust each other, us women. We cannot become complacent again and we shouldn’t permit it. We have a purpose, we always have.

Expand full comment

Might try reading Timothy Snyder's "The Road to Unfreedom" -- to get a sense of how religion is used as a tool once again to control the masses, how truth is erased as a bulwark, how Christianity is expressly removed from the mix.

Expand full comment

Daughter of Holocaust victims here. I know exactly how it works.

Expand full comment

Daughter of Nazi/Bolshevik/Soviet occupation, Marlene -- sharing your pain and your resolve. Your perception about their 'kristofascism' as a tool, reminded me of Snyder's book.

Expand full comment

I hope you have a lot of love in your life.

Expand full comment

If you’re speaking to me, David, yes, yes I do.

Expand full comment

I was and I'm very glad to hear it!

Expand full comment

Biden did pass the torch--to all of us! And we did as you say. We got very excited and joyful, and money from many of us poured into Kamala's coffers.

But I still have the only HARRIS bumper sticker I've seen. I made mine.

Expand full comment

They are available for preorder w/expected ship date of August 12th.

Expand full comment

Shoot. I wish I could post a photo here, but it's not working. I'm damn proud of it. But thanks for the info. I'm sure others will use it!

Expand full comment

Marlene, Is there another event going on today?

Expand full comment

Thanks. I just signed up.

Expand full comment

Spread the word, Susan!

Expand full comment

I think everyone was waiting for someone or something to get ball rolling.

A lot of individuals tried.

A lot of groups tried.

But nothing felt “right” to the people until our President, who worked extremely hard to strengthen America for us for four difficult years, while bad actors (and occasionally some of our own) undermined him every step of the way, said, “No More”.

The shock waves from his decision jarred Americans out of our stasis.

I don’t know about any of you, but when Joe Biden stepped down from his candidacy, it felt like the death of a parent. Then the sudden, daunting realization that we were suddenly on our own and expected to sink or swim.

But wait, our President left a light on for us before he stepped aside. He endorsed Kamala Harris…

Poor Kamala Harris. She had to have felt every single one of the measuring eyes of Americans, of the world, friends and foes, and everyone in between, land on her all at once. But there she stood, tall and strong, like our American flag has through countless moments, as she waited for us to decide on a democracy for all or to hand over our country to those who would destroy us.

Then, all over social media, people started using their voices, some quiet and uncertain and some loudly, to rally behind Kamala Harris, while the extremist Right Wing stood with their mouths agape.

I don’t think the rest of us have ever heard the strength and beauty in how all of our different voices sound together…

Let’s keep singing so others can find us.

Expand full comment

Wow. Let us all keep singing so the others can find us.

Expand full comment

Listen for the tuba line. You do not want my singing voice contributing. But I can knock down a heck of a bass line.

Expand full comment

Haha! Whatever works!!

Expand full comment

Such a lovely comment.

Expand full comment

I love this - what an inspiring response!! 🇺🇸

Expand full comment

So beautifully put. You got me crying again ❤️🙏

Expand full comment

Lisa, You said it all. From wanting to cry when Joe Biden stood down to the overwhelming joy of watching Kamala RISE and we followed with joy and commitment. It is ALL OF US taking up the torch for Democracy, Decency and Integrity.

Expand full comment

Well said Lisa, women are now the leaders and especially with Kamala Harris taking her role as the Presidential Candidate, I can hardly wait to watch her poll numbers continue to go up, her rallies being filled with more and more strong young women who are angry and determined to be the ones who control what they do with their body.

Expand full comment

Yes, but let’s remember that this is all people working together for the benefit & protection of all - a full chorus with a full range of voices.

Expand full comment

Beautiful, Lisa.

Expand full comment

"Those zoom meetings are our version of the "peoples' assemblies" that brought forth the democratic revolutions in 1789 and 1917 and 2011." Wonderfully said. Participate, from the comfort of our homes and a click or two of the fingers to donate. It's a great start.

Expand full comment

TC, Kamala needs Bernie's endorsement. Since Kamala has so much support, she should support us and go for single-payer and tax the rich. subsidized child care wouldn't hurt. Kamala used the word "tangible" in her first speech. Now let's hear some details. I thought "hope and change" meant more than the ACA. I don't want to be disappointed again. What do you think?

Expand full comment

Thank you for the link, Gary. I'd not seen any news of this aside from yours.

Bernie, like Joe Biden, is patron saint of sorts -- of the Liz Warren sort, too.

Expand full comment

Liz endorsed Kamala on July 22,. That's a meaningful endorsement!

Once you have Liz in your corner you've got the Good Guys on your side.

Expand full comment

I was there despite short notice and having to stand at the very back of the great crowd he brought in.

Expand full comment

Single payer “Medicare for All” polls well until people are asked if they will make sacrifices like not being able to keep the doctor they have. Then support among “average voters” tumbles. While we are sprinting for the finish line during the next 99 days, let’s not trip over our shoelaces on something that cannot be done without a 60-vote majority in the Senate, making it a promise that can’t be fulfilled any time soon.

Expand full comment

Uhh...since when does Medicare for all require the sacrifice of not being able to keep your doctor? I'm on Medicare and I have the doctors I want. Is that a poll thing? Ask people if they will accept a negative situation that doesn't even exist, then get the negative polling response you want?

Expand full comment

Great comment. My husband & I have been on Medicare for years, & we have always been able to see any doctor we want - & that includes specialists in Boston.

Expand full comment

It depends on the doctor. I have a primary care physician in name only. When I aged into Medicare, my care was transferred to his nurse practitioner. I’ve deduced over the years that the physician billable hours are reserved for patients with private insurance, as the Medicare reimbursement is less than private insurance. I’m not complaining, at all. My nurse practitioner is wonderful: excellent caregiver, delightful personality, we share pictures of our grandchildren at my visits, and she can and does write prescriptions and make appointments for me whenever I need them. For primary care

Expand full comment

… she’s all I need. She also shares results from my physicals with the specialists I see (endocrinologist, ophthalmologist, and podiatrist. I’m a type 1 diabetic) When I see these specialists, it’s the doctor.

Expand full comment

never pays to overgeneralize Susan, or question the meme.

Expand full comment

I was just asking a question Frank. In response to a suggestion that Medicare for All would force you to give up your doctors. Do you have Medicare?

Expand full comment

I'm Canadian, docs in NB are in short supply so best to keep the person/s you have. Some others rebutted that claim for some places in USA

Expand full comment

Medicare for all is an insurance program. Not a healthcare system. I don't understand why people get that confused.

Expand full comment

I am sorry you are so bitter. Many Americans share you bitterness. We Americans need to face up to our part in this situation. We want government to provide social services, but we don’t want to pay taxes to support those services. We spend millions of dollars on Halloween decorations, yet are outraged if asked to pay more in taxes. We want a single payer health care system, but we don’t want any of the changes that come with it. We want a responsive government but a huge percentage of us can’t be bothered to vote. We want higher wages, but we don’t want to pay more for our goods and services. We want a healthy environment, but we pack the highways with oversized cars and trucks, consume ever more stuff and send it to the landfill. We want responsible journalism, but we can’t look away from the click bait. I could go on, but you get the idea.

Expand full comment

I resent that you lump us all in this post. I pay plenty as a recent widow while Elon and Jeff skate by with a million loopholes. I have been “woke,” engaged and done my best to reject the path of least resistance. I will slog on as will many who care and give what they are able to.

Expand full comment

In some ways this sounds like the GOP line- Blame the victims. It’s not wealth disparity that keeps us struggling as the mega wealthy get mega wealthier, it’s our fault for wanting a level playing field that benefits all, couched as “don’t buy an iPhone if you can’t afford it”. The working and middle classes are paying a disproportionate amount, carrying the burden of government.

Expand full comment

Gail, are the lower classes paying more for government? The answer depends on how one frames it. As a proportion of all taxes paid to the Treasury, the richest pay far more. As a proportion of individual income needed to thrive, they pay fast less. Republicans use the first frame (collectively the rich pay more dollars) while Democrats use the 2nd frame (the rich pay a lower proportion of their NEEDED income in taxes [even though their marginal tax rates are much higher]). The above excludes wealth, which is treated separately from income. Why do I state all this in response to your post, because your argument, which widely repeated and true, is ignored by the rich because they have the other argument, which is also true.

In other words, we need to refrained the discussion, somehow.

Expand full comment

That's when I generally respond with the Propublica article, outline how the wealthy avoid income tax. Usually shuts down that "the rich pay more" line.

Expand full comment

You mean this one?

https://www.propublica.org/article/billionaires-tax-avoidance-techniques-irs-files

If so, I understand. Those tax avoidance schemes are legal, for sure, but tax laws created decades ago need to be amended to reflect current economic realities.

Expand full comment

Yup. And yup.

Expand full comment

You cover a lot of territory there, Terry. Services are not free, and in health care Americans pay nearly double than eg Canadians with their public health service, and that's higher than most similar OECD countries.

Expand full comment

Who the heck are "we", Terry? Certainly not "me". Did it include all of is here? Does it include you? Or are you expressing a media-amplified mantra of the right? (Sorry for the tone. I'm not accusing you of anything, but I'm really curious who is so resistant. Even when I tended to vote Republican, I hesitated about the Right's knee-jerk resistance to a more effective government and the work and sacrifices needed to get it. Most of my acquaintances who were more conservative than me would not have minded paying more for programs and services they could understand.)

Expand full comment

The GOP/Project 2025 aim is to totally privatize Medicare.

ACO Reach is Medicare Advantage on steroids, a profit-driven model and Trump -era pilot program that Biden admin slightly modified.Medicare patients may be taken out of traditional Medicare and put into an ACO, (often owned by a health insurance or private equity company) without their knowledge.

https://pnhp.org/news/medicare-privatization-aco-reach-the-ethics-of-for-profit-health-care/

99 days to go and my focus will be on GOTV !! When VP Kamala wins,one focus will be lobbying to end ACO

✍️📲💲🚶‍♀️📣👕🛒

Expand full comment

Wow, new to me, and I go on Medicare Thursday. Thank you for this article. Slogging through Google I found very little analysis.

Expand full comment

Gail, do not, and I repeat, DO NOT sign up for any Advantage Program. I hit Medicare 18 months ago and with a prescription plan and a supplemental plan pay very little out of pocket. Advantage plans look great to healthy 65 year olds. They start to crush them when they actually start feeling the impacts of ageing, whether that happens at 70 or 75.

Expand full comment

Supplement, Plan G, in place! Plus a drug plan. With RA I didn’t even consider Advantage plans, though til the end of ‘24 my meds will cost a fortune. 2025 sees the medication cost capped ay $2K. Colonoscopy on Wednesday to squeeze the last out of my private insurance. Whee! 😂

Expand full comment

Reminds me of when Blue Cross Blue Shield companies were 501(c)(4) non-profits that were chosen as partners to administer Medicare (which had a 2% administrative overhead compared to private companies that were 15% or higher).

Expand full comment

or do away with the filibuster. The Senate has built-in conservative bias.

Expand full comment

Yes, the filibuster and the Electoral College, the two elements that could be a major factor in bringing down what's left of our democratic republic.

Expand full comment

Rather, it has a “small state” bias. The small states tend to be rural and dependent on manufacturing. That makes them the employment losers with automation and global trade. This was effectively ignored by both parties (focused on campaign donors) until Trump saw an opening and woke us all up.

Our politicians are still in the thrall of donations by the upper 20%.

Look at campaign finance vouchers to break this pattern. There was a weak and never pushed try in 2022’s HR1 For The People Act that failed.

To push it means breaking dems dependence on money from the big banks and finance firms. That will take true bravery. Does Harris have it?

See my Substack

Expand full comment

We need a recent poll. Medicare supplement insurance and Medicare Advantage plans are further exploiting us. The Dems ask me to donate on behalf of wanting single-payer. The ACA is getting too expensive. I am sick of donating and hoping every four years and getting zilch in return. We have already lost our democratic republic and I'm reluctant to continue to be part of the charade. Elections are a new industry in the financialization of our country.

Expand full comment

Without hope, we have nothing, no chance for change. I get it. I feared Biden stepping down as I didn't trust the Democratic party to do the right thing. But Joe did the right thing and our support of Kamala is sending a message to the Democratic party.

If Kamala is who she is campaigning to be, she will be the change...that we have to keep fighting for. This won't stop once Donny is defeated. Until wealth can no longer buy elections (rich Democratic donors also must be stopped, too), we will have to fight like the dickens...then we will have to fight our own complacency....or it will all slip away again.

Expand full comment

That is a straw man; in Medicare you have any doctor willing to have Medicare.

Expand full comment

Exactly so. Not all physicians’ practices accept the lower Medicare reimbursement.

Expand full comment

I suspected Obama made a deal to not persue Medicare for All and instead compromise with a system that makes a fortune for the insurance/finance/healthcare industry. Does Kamala or any presidential candidate have to make a deal with the devil to be elected? Now, instead of hearing a platform about what a candidate will do for us, we hear what we can keep. Now it's not hope and change, it's hope things don't change.

Expand full comment

We con't have to "make adeal with the devil." It's just a good idea to know when to make a fight. Before a close election, and when your side doesn't have the power to make the promise come true, isn't a good time to pick the fight. Promising what you cannot deliver is a good way to piss off supporters.

Expand full comment

Trump's supporters don't get pissed off when he doesn't deliver. Instead of pretending the people don't really want what they do want, Harris should go for what we want and hammer home that we need a clear majority in both houses to make it happen. Kamala will get my vote, reluctantly as the lesser of two evils like usual. You know what they say about doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. Am I an idiot or just the victim of a system without real choices.

Expand full comment

I have no idea what you mean. " lesser of two evils"? You waiting for god to show up or something? Because I hate to tell you, he doesn't exist.

Expand full comment

They are a cult… Dems are not. Big diff

Expand full comment

Keep on hoping, Gloria

Expand full comment

I recall how many Germans went to great lengths to surrender to Allied forces at the end of WWII (instead of Soviets).

I do hope an overwhelming number of voters make a similar effort to prevent the far more catastrophic choice.

Allen Dulles was initially very concerned about the supposed "Werwolf" resistance force that would stay behind as Allies advanced through Germany, but was a bit amazed at the nothing-burger it turned out to be.

See https://militaryhistorynow.com/2015/10/23/the-fighting-werwolves-the-third-reichs-underground-army/

"...Although operations were sporadic at best, some Werwolf teams did carry out their orders. A band of teenaged trainees managed to murder the Allied appointed mayor of Aachen in March of 1945 shortly after the occupation of the town. Werwolves were also blamed for a number of random attacks over the spring.

As the war edged ever closer to its conclusion, Nazi propagandists continued to trumpet the resistance. Goebbels even established Radio Werwolf, which in between faux news reports of attacks, urged the German people to rise up against the Allies. However, most accounts of sabotage or assassination were wildly exaggerated, falsely attributed to the resistance movement, or completely fabricated. For example, the Werwolves were incorrectly credited with the murder of U.S. general Maurice Rose who was actually killed in action on the frontlines. Other incidents, like the June 5 blast at the Bremen headquarters, as well as a deadly explosion at an ammunition depot near the River Elbe on July 31, were attributed to pro-Nazi holdouts, although there is little evidence to support such claims.[3]

Despite the fact that no serious uprising ever emerged (Prützmann himself committed suicide in May of 1945), the threat of one dogged the Allied occupiers constantly for weeks after the fall of Berlin. Still, British, French and American armies rounded up and detained tens of thousands of German soldiers and civilians they suspected of being insurgents and held many of them in appalling conditions. In the east, the Soviets summarily executed hundreds of young men it considered Werwolves and sent more than 10,000 to special camps. [4] Many never returned..."

It will be interesting to see if Trump supporters get similarly disinterested in risking their lives for such a foolish cause, or just simply not vote. Either way, I want every freedom and justice loving American to vote undeniably against the whole Project 2025, Agenda47, and Schedule F nonsense as possible.

Expand full comment

You have to make promises even if the fight spans presidential terms.

Expand full comment

On Medicare, I think Obama was overwhelmed by the opposition. Health care along turned Obama into a pariah and generated the Tea Party. Republicans are so divided they have never been able to come up with a public or semi-public plan. They are beholden to the "free enterprise" profit model.

Expand full comment

Well, they have a "plan"........Project 2025.

Expand full comment

So let's quadruple the effort to get Single Payer and a lot more Healthcare workers. See https://www.oracle.com/human-capital-management/healthcare-workforce-shortage/

I recall a recently retired Doctor complaining about a shortage of Doctors, and Nurses who just couldn't handle the stressful workloads anymore (despite having made something like $600,000 in about 18 months as a traveling Nurse).

A friend's wife who had been an RN for years before running the medical billing department at her Hospital finally retired and moved to a rural community where they were having a very difficult time keeping Doctors, especially OBGYNs who were paying outrageous malpractice insurance rates. She ended up starting her own Medical Billing Assistance company with enough experience and expertise to have her own software written to handle all the perverse coding and contesting of bills insurance companies found every imaginable excuse to either not pay or draw it out so long that people gave up. I think she ended up the last I heard supporting 6 Doctors, one of whom was down to eating peanut butter for lack of ability to get the bills honored, to enable the Doctors to remain in the community, The last one rufused to sig up for her service, telling her there was no way he was going to pay 14% for the service. She looked at a tall basket and asked him what they were. When he said they were the Bills he couldn't get approved in the last year (losing the right to try to collect if he didn't act on them for a year). She took the stack , coded, submitted, and followed up on them successfully, allowing him to get nearly 100% of his bills accepted.

I'd like to think he could lower his overhead costs so much that he could charge significantly less. What other countries have such a snarl of complexity in access to care and billing that requires such a highly trained workforce to get through the insurance company barriers?

According to https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/sep/20/bernie-sanders/comparing-administrative-costs-private-insurance-a/

"...Private insurance companies in this country spend between 12 and 18 percent on administration costs," Sanders said on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sept. 17. "The cost of administering the Medicare program, a very popular program that works well for our seniors, is 2 percent. We can save approximately $500 billion a year just in administration costs..."

I was so fortunate to discover most of my Doctors had interned in VA facilities and the Mayo Clinics (discovering many by asking them after watching Documentary on The Mayo Clinic). See https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-mayo-clinic/

I think we need to expand on such programs to lower the training costs (keep them from requiring an average $250,000 educational debts) and solving the Malpractice Insurance overhead that seems to cost Doctors more than double my highest annual income (how much of that cost do they get tax deductions for)?

Expand full comment

Eyes on the prize. When a good chunk of the country has voiced support for doing away with the Constitution, when they broadcast that democracy is bad, when a small but active group is comfortable talking openly about armed revolution, I think maybe we've got bigger fish to fry than M4A.

Expand full comment

When the majority can't have what they need, what are we fighting to preserve!

Expand full comment

For me, democracy is what we're fighting for.

Expand full comment

I didn't make my point very well. If the majority can't get what they need, it's no longer a democracy. Even Jimmy Carter admitted we have an oligarchy several years ago. We won't get it back if the only goal of our representatives is to get elected and reelected by going for the money to run on. Common people can't donate enough to keep up with donations from the wealth class.

Expand full comment

But with campaign finance vouchers , “common people “ certainly could “keep up”. That is all that is needed. Just match the money and then pay attention to the ideas as they are discussed.

This what I write about

Expand full comment

Bernie has endorsed her.

Expand full comment

Then I will be expecting to hear Kamala fight for the majority instead of the wealthy instead of "save the democracy" vagueness when I believe we have already become an oligarchy. Show me what the majority wants is achievable.

Expand full comment

Very typical of our current (un)press that they have not printed news of Bernie S and Elizabeth W support for Kamala Harris.

Expand full comment

Well said, TC, well said. And to carry on with your French Revolution motif--conveniently while the World gathers for the Olympics in the City of Lights that spawned that Revolution---I would add that at this moment we are indeed in the best of times and the worst of times. The choice is as clear as clarity can be. I too worked in the Obama campaign in 2008. I think what happened then should not be mitigated, but as high as the stakes were then, they are significantly higher now. Obama was the rare Tribune of the People who balanced intellectual firepower with charismatic appeal. Kamala Harris is sharp and oozes a different type of "it factor" charisma, not as lofty as Obama, but being lofty may not be as important now as being of the moment.

The old boxing mantra that "styles make fights" finds its political parallel here, as Despicable Don's style seems not built to last when dealing with this particular female, pant suited opponent, an opponent already living so fully in his inflated head that he can't seem to see straight. She has him right where she wants him it would seem, and I certainly hope she can maintain that posture through to November.

He can't hit what he can't see, and so far, she is certainly floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee

Expand full comment

Yes indeed to all.

Expand full comment

I think that sound we're hearing, getting closer and closer and louder and louder is a ROAR, and it's coming from females and minorities, working class people and students, who have been shafted by the oligarchs and their clueless, racist, misogynistic foot soldiers, the MAGA/KKK forces. If I am correct, we're experiencing another "American revolution." Thank goodness.

Expand full comment

The Zoom call tomorrow has more than one million people signed on. Harris has taken on the role of leader of the Democratic Party and breathed 🔥 into it. We've never been known for our cohesion (c.f. Will Rogers) but if we can maintain this level of joyful warriorhood through Nov 5 and for the interregnum, she may well have to saved our republic from the twin scourges of Christofascism and Project 2025.

Expand full comment

TC, you always say what we all think. I too worked for Obama in 2008 and 2012, thinking that his election was the seismic shift to a post-racial America. I was wrong.

His ascendancy released a long-dormant cauldron of hate that began with the Tea Party and culminated with J6.

We mistook the election of Obama as the end. It was just the beginning of the next chapter of that long arc towards creating that more perfect union.

Expand full comment

TC, every other democratic system (as you know) manages their campaigns for their executives and representatives usually within a 100 day window and they seem to have plenty of time to inform the populace--and it is usually not enough time for media moguls to jam their thumbs on the scale in the way that our perpetual campaign system provides them. I would love to see a constitutional amendment stating that campaigns have to be limited, as well as their funding (getting rid of the Citizens United decision, for instance).

Expand full comment

Not Citizens United. That is whack-a-mole.

Instead, MATCH (!) the relative pittance the plutocrats and special interests are spending.

$10-20 billion in a $27 TRILLION economy? Come on!

With a campaign finance voucher program (similar to HR1 For the People Act that was filibustered) The wealthy would not even notice the cost (except their loss of power) and the poor would pay virtually nothing to get true power back.

This is what I write about in my Substack

Expand full comment

Well said TC!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Expand full comment

Marvelous piece

Expand full comment

I am grateful to Heather and to you TC for some wonderful quotes. (As my brain fails to capture the once known these days, I am in awe of you both. (Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin, really?? It certainly captured the spirit!) Thank you, both!

Expand full comment

We the people have certainly risen up (forcefully and with joy) but it was Joe Biden who made sure that the party would unite in support of Kamal Harris, by taking the time to organize a seamless handover before stepping aside. I would bet that he (and definitely his team) had been preparing for that possibility since the beginning of the 2024 campaign.

Expand full comment

Thanks TC; I needed that. I know you like quotes from the poet, songwriter the perpetual; "vagabond" per Joan from Hibbing Minnesota so -- thank you again for letting me 🎶 " breathe the air around Tom Paine."

Expand full comment

Thank you TC in LA!

Expand full comment

You really see it as a “bottom up “ movement? I see the elite 400 members of the DNC making rules to favor President Biden, and now Vice President Harris.RFKJR did not have a fair or democratic chance to become the nominee. Your party as the Republican Party ,is being dominated by the wealthy and the corporations . The only way to restore democracy is to vote for someone not beholden and that is RFKJR.

Expand full comment

“He passed it to us”. WOW, Dr Richardson you are so good! And you know we know how to keep the flame alight. Basic simple things like kindness, respect, hard work, laughter, everything goes into it. And the insights you bring, Dr Richardson, helping us to see what has happened before in order to step around those rabbit-holes in our path. We’re in this together and by god we ain’t goin back. I know the assignment. Peace and solidarity

Expand full comment

This post is an example of mastery! Some times, some people have knowledge, experience, and a worldview that coalesces into a distillation that packs a wallop, like Heather's post today. Events happen while big dynamics place us in a flow of time as conditions change. I'm grateful for this moment and also aware that see-saw dynamics are underway. No turning back, just looking back. This forum assists me in sense-making.

Expand full comment

Bob, you're right, we do have an "assignment." Action. Getting involved in voter registration activities locally and donating money to political campaigns. $10 each from 1,000,000 people starts becoming real money that buys a lot of media time.

Expand full comment

My experience is that I and many of my friends got complacent, expecting anyone elected President would honor the norms because, as far as we could see, they had. After 2016, the favorite description has been “unprecedented “ as TFG ignored one rule after another, starting with the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. Now he, and The Heritage Foundation have come out of the shadows. We have a candidate accustomed to seeing through frauds and recognizing corruption —as well as helping us believe that we (with her guidance) can fix it.

As for Junior Disaster Vance, he obviously didn’t pay attention to the Million Women March—I think that anyone who loves an animal should get an extra vote <sarcasm>.

Expand full comment

"Junior Disaster Vance"

LOVE IT

Thanks for the chuckle!

Expand full comment

OK, that moniker for the Shillbilly is fabulous.

Expand full comment

Trump assures his followers that, with their votes, he will fix it so they never have to vote again, pretty much the polar opposite of what the founders, for all of their contradictions, and Lincoln fought to instill and preserve. Yes, democracy is a living thing, and living things (kids, pets, whatever) can be troublesome and labor intensive. Living things need constant input and attendance. Living things evolve and adapt, and sometimes screw up, but life is precious. Utopia means "no place" fora reason, but we CAN form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. We can learn and we can improve, and make the most of the brevity and preciousness of sentience and agency.

Expand full comment

JL Graham,

In my opinion, a reason for so many following DT and his minions is the simple fact that we as a nation have become so uneducated regarding our government....the duties and responsibilities of our leaders as well as the power and importance of the vote.

Civics should be required and taught , in some form from kindergarten through high school.

"The People's Business" within our state and nation should be shared once a week in every classroom, as well as what those decisions mean to "We the People".

We are so easily manipulated by the words of a candidate expressing empty promises. We have closed our minds and ears to what some of those words from a certain candidate would mean for the free and fair governing of "We the People."

The lives of so many before us...their sacrifices.....their brilliance have been given to build up our great nation. We need such men and women again.

I am so grateful for that little "Spit Fire" from Texas and news reporters who are true freedom fighters.

We each have our part to play to keep our country free and healthy for the next generations!!!

Expand full comment

Due to the economic impacts of the Great Depression neither of my parents were college educated, but they remained intensely curious all of their lives. Among other things, my mother told me that one could be clever yet not wise, and that wisdom began with knowing how little one really knew. That makes the subject a bit tricky to approach, and warnings abound about any presumption of possessing wisdom, but I think, if we are attentive, that wisdom can grow with experience; with the caveat the experience is only an opportunity to learn; and teen Greta Thunberg towered(s) in comparison to elderly Trump.

My take on it is that wisdom constucts cautious, observant guesses as to both the accuracy and the value of the information one gathers. Value is the trickier one because it's both subjective and not. Priorities and actions obviously have consequences, as we are just beginning to see with respect to climate change, and many other knock-on consequences of political choices. At the end what really matters? I'm not saying that that's easy to determine, or that I personally am anywhere close to having mastered it, but that seems that such a question would be a beneficial mantra in which to engage throughout the day. It also seems to me that I was offered some real gems, even in my elementary school, but also a ton of what (both then and now) felt like "busy-work".

All of that is a round-about way to say that I think the quality of our individual and societal lives are profoundly affected by the quality of our education, and here I am speaking of a kit that empowers rather than regimentation. Also that education is not just what you do when you are young. A democratic society has a responsibility to educate indefinitely, irrespective of age and certificates. This blog models that; HCR presents salient lessons from the past, anchored with footnotes, along with suggestions of the relevance to current circumstances. That's living history, patterns that can be seen playing out in similar yet uniquely novel circumstances. I think that wisdom involves optimal grasp of the relevance of what can be known with allowance for what is unpredictable. I think this can make a hell of a difference.

Expand full comment

Well said!

Expand full comment

Living things--Great! Living things need repeated--repeated--exercise, attention, feeding, thought, planning...living things need life itself.

Expand full comment

Each generation lends life to the principles recorded in the Constitution. It's just an object otherwise. So-called "originalists" want to see it pickled it in a bottle, even as they cheerfully ignore the guidance of the Preamble, but it become a living thing to the degreewe incorporate principles of liberty, unity, justice, and responsibility into our own social practices and daily lives.

Expand full comment

If folks at least read the preamble to the Constitution, they'd have an idea of what it's framers, envisioned for America & Americans.

Expand full comment

Today we would call it a "mission statement", which legalizing bribery very clearly violates. That a socially unaccountable executive (or judiciary) self-evidently violates even more.

Expand full comment

👏👏👏👏👏

Expand full comment

"When President Joe Biden announced just a week ago that he would not accept the Democratic nomination for president, he did not pass the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris.

He passed it to us. " Professor, you are the only one who could write this letter with the conclusion that it is now voters to fight, not Kamala Harris, to make true what Lincolon prophesized in Gettysburg.

You are taking the role of Thomas Payne. Thank you Professor.

Expand full comment

YES, our Heather is SO MS. PAYNE, fearlessly spreading the message, People, Wake Up!

Expand full comment

“There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”

― Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

Expand full comment

I love that, Bobette. Thanks!

Expand full comment

This moment in history has me listening to the sound track of Hamilton. There are so many passages in the lyrics that ring true right now.

Much as it was during the Revolution, everyone has to decide which way this country will proceed.

Me, I’ll Rise Up! And I’m not throwing away my shot!!

Expand full comment

Beautifully written - although it ain't over 'til the fat man whines.

Expand full comment

The following is my weekly submission to the local newspaper here in central VA. I do not know if it will be published but please enjoy.

Hello, fellow Americans. This week we have witnessed greatness. President Joe Biden has been and still is the best President in my 77 years. Besides his many accomplishments, he has shown he so believes in the goodness and wisdom of the American people that he can let go of the helm and "we, the people" will guide the ship of state into the next generation. That is the amazing level of courage he possesses. He knows and acknowledges that he and the government work for us. He knows that we aren’t finished with the job of making that “us” an even bigger group but we’re still striving for it. He loved the job of leading this great nation, a nation navigating around the treasonous reef of Donald Trump. He has used his mastery of political piloting to do that. Then he showed us all that he loved this nation even more than the personal satisfaction he got from guiding it. At the end of the day Scranton Joe has given us all a “master's course” in service, humility, empathy, patriotism, courage, and leadership. I, for one, will be grateful for the rest of my life.

Furthermore, I believe President Biden, in one masterstroke, once again successfully lured the Trumpians into one of his traps. He vehemently maintained that he was their opponent, an old guy of receding energy and ability. Only after their convention did he spring the trap. Now they have an aggressive former prosecutor with youth and vigor against an old convicted felon. She clearly states she knows Donald Trump’s type. She has dealt with that type and fondly remembers sending them to the “big house”, not the White House.

A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for a better American future.

Expand full comment

Well said 👏👏

Expand full comment

A trap was set but not by President Biden. The lightening strike was the shooting in PA and the subsequent bleak outlook for democracy. Given her equivocal statement, Nancy Pelosi likely set the trap by having Adam Schiff call for Biden to stand down. Nancy was the “all at once” conductor.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pelosi-behind-schiff-call-biden-step-aside-doesnt-think-he-can-win-white-house-2024-07-18/

Expand full comment

I did not vote for Schiff for his Senator candidacy. I voted for Katie Porter.

Expand full comment

We could have a long conversation on this and KNOW only as much as we know now. Have a great day.

Expand full comment

Really well written. You should be proud of the way you wrote your opinion. And as a Democrat, I can say I agree with you and so thankful that Joe Biden led us through so many tough times. He is a wise man and will be remembered that way. Here’s hoping that Kamala Harris learned a lot from Biden and will continue on the path he set.

Expand full comment

Thank you and amen on Harris learning from the Master ; > ))

Expand full comment

Outstanding thoughts for today. For decades, I have believed that we the people have to be active participants in our democracy. I believe we the people insists that we participate by voting, for one, but we must also communicate with our Congressmen, complimenting when they do good and voicing concern when they take their power and harm “we the people” ( Dobbs is one case in point).

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Richardson, for writing about how history doesn’t repeat but it “rhymes “. I always appreciate your calm voice when we need one.

And of course we need it now because I, like most people want to keep our democracy and freedom.

Expand full comment

President Joe Biden has passed the torch to us.

He steadfastly maintains "WE are the United States of America. There is NOTHING we cannot do if we do it TOGETHER."

The choice is Democracy or Dictatorship.

I Understand the Assignment.

UNITED WE WIN.

Let's Go!

Expand full comment

Take My Hand

Harriet Tubman mural by Michael Rosato

Look it up!

Expand full comment

Beautiful, Beverly...thanks so much!

Expand full comment

Looked it up! WOW! Thanks

Expand full comment

It is up to us. It is not up to the President, the politicians, the media or luck. We all need to learn the facts of what the Republicans are planning on doing to our Country. Their plan of suppressing the vote, stealing the results if necessary and instituting Project 2025 is our own spark to fight.

We have been given a huge gift by President Biden. We make the most of it and win this election.

"We're Not Going Back."

Expand full comment

Yes, we may be on a good wave.

But doesn't it behoove us to understand how all those Republicans so sank to their cult criminality?

If so, let's go back to 1992, a year after the Soviet Union had fallen. I had been in Hungary five years. In 1987 George Soros gave me a plane ticket and $2,000 for a Hungarian language school in Budapest. I had earlier worked in human rights in New York, but tired of fire house mentality. Some dictator in a left-wing or right-wing country would imprison some writer or journalist, and Amnesty International, PEN American Center, or the Committee to Protect Journalists would react.

I sought more – that good guys get ahead of the curve.

I’d learned of the great poets of Hungary. That plus my father’s parents both having been born Hungarian, and my childhood memories of them, had me desire to learn their language – was there a secret to its great poets?

I’d ended up also in Slovakia as first Fulbrighter to the fifth and last university in Czechoslovakia to have a Fulbrighter. I’d learned, yes, there was a secret. People rise when they learn to see and draw on cultural neighbors.

By the late 1980s, the only Soviet-allied academics to visit any other countries were those with the secret police. All otherwise learned only the Marxist labels for cultural neighbors. When I got Soros money in 1992 for a central European first-ever program for guest speakers from neighboring cultures, I asked the 100 teachers of English at Hungary’s lead university (whose faculty I was on) for guests any knew personally. No one knew anyone.

Absence of the linking personal is what has beset the U.S. – why Republicans have abstracted all to their corruptions. But Dems have also been weak. Can they expand to apt personal connections?

Expand full comment

Phil right now this momentum we are experiencing needs to be capitalized upon. It is as if we are riding a giant wave, and we need to keep up our velocity and focus. Historians will have the wisdom of the broad map of just how things came to this moment.

For now, we must, must get the work done of protecting our beloved Democracy. Frankly, it feels so nice to be happy and hopeful again.

Expand full comment

Efforts are underway -

The Colorado Democratic Party will be hosting a call-in with Governor Jared Polis. to discuss strategy and the way forward. I'm sure we'll be doing more than raise funds.

So far, Kamala has gained more than 170,000 new volunteers to help campaign, and this will only add more before we're finished.

Expand full comment

And Colorado is just piece of this movement. Gratefully amazed.

Expand full comment

Yes. Yes. Yes, Barbara.

But if our Dems add personal reference -- including happy notes of apt movies, novels, other arts -- they'll really be humanly convincing. A real roll. And fitting trashing of trash.

Expand full comment

Choose a vision and a future based on equitable cooperation, and just say "no" to Mordor.

Expand full comment

And "yes" to Frodo.

Expand full comment

And Samwise (my favorite).

Expand full comment

Frodo and Gandalf had the leveler heads.

Expand full comment

I think you may be misinterpreting the seeming political stats quo in entropic Democratic circles. The deep shock and wounding of reversing Roe v Wade, its open visceral attack on half the world’s population (when the US sneezes the world catches a cold), its implicit complicity in the rising tide of global Femicide, should not be underestimated.

The growing grassroots and global rejection of this extreme reactionary misogyny is only going to strengthen.

Expand full comment

I think it is extremely important to remember how we got here, for the good and the bad of it. That has to be part of why we are endowed with a brain. We learn, or at least have the opportunity to learn, what works and what doesn't, and we learn stories that become part of how we organize our thoughts and feelings. We make our own story every day. History can't precisely reveal the future, but it can effectively educate our guesses.

I am impressed that when a plane crashes, there is detailed investigation and analysis to determine "what went wrong", and try to head it off in the future. Demagogues, corrupt officials, and big lies are nothing new, and we have been lax about some ominous development over several decades. We can't kick the can down the road any longer. Everything that is admirable about American Society is facing clear and present danger, and that danger has never gone away, nor will it. Like pathogenic microorganisms, the narcissistic "Dark Side of The Force" is always present, but we can. with constant vigilance, push it back. Or we can also be overwhelmed.

Expand full comment

We established our cultural connections vis AFS-hosting exchange students from 12 different countries. We talk regularly to our Hungarian son about Politics and various European goings on. I watched with interest yesterday's Venezuelan elections where there appears to be a chance for real change. (also had a Venezuelan) I recommend hosting to any with the resources as a way to better understand the world and help the world understand the US.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Heather. A heady encapsulation of our best and most hopeful times in history. You have fired me up to get everyone to vote. !Venceremos!

Expand full comment