443 Comments

Thank you Professor.

The MAGA-controlled GOP, who now talk about a "unified Reich". I think they draw from a toxic pool that precedes McCarthy.

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

― Joseph Goebbels

Expand full comment

For most of my youth, it seemed that Joe McCarthy's legacy was infamy, but it seemed that after Nixon's disgrace, Republican's drew the lesson that if you are going to lie, then lie really BIGLY, always attack, and never, ever, ever admit fault. Apart from serving the very, very wealthy, it is now the core modus operani of the party.

Expand full comment

"You didn't come out guns blazing and just challenge them. You showed weakness," Trump told the friend, according to Woodward. "You've got to be strong. You've got to be aggressive. You've got to push back hard. You've got to deny anything that's said about you. Never admit."

Expand full comment

That's just what Trump's followers are doing. Denying and not admitting the truth. Of course their "truth" is distorted by their allegiance to a liar and a cheat.

Expand full comment

But with the Gang of Six destroying law, his immunity is imminent

Expand full comment

Dave, I really hope not, but wouldn't be surprised since they should have just let the lower court's decision stand. There was a meme on Facebook showing Alito upside down. Both he and Thomas should recuse themselves. They won't of course because they are totally without decency and integrity.

Expand full comment

Then Biden really CAN authorize the FBI to use deadly force!

Expand full comment

And they get away with it because the trial is not televised.

Expand full comment

And if it was televised they would not show it on Fox "Entertainment". I was at the French Lick Indiana Resort. I walked into an empty room and they had the television turned to Fox News. I turned the television off!

Expand full comment

God bless you for turning off the Murdochian Ministry of Mendacity, Sharon!

In the birthplace of Larry Bird of all places, all good Americans would do the same thing!

Expand full comment

Primed and pumped, now, not only by the indiscriminate ramblings of a candidate /mob boss but by the lackey wannabe "leaders" of the new repub party.

Expand full comment

It is spelled out in www.Project2025.org.

Expand full comment

So true!!

Expand full comment

We don’t need him to stop lying which won’t happen anyway simply because he’s in his own world in his head. We need the press to stop fanning his flames by giving him and his followers so much print and air time. Psychologists agree hearing a falsehood enough times eventually leads to believing it’s true. Can we please just put a gag on this snake oul salesman’s show and be done with him? Yes what he’s dine and been makes him news. But how about burying it on the back pages instead of blaring it above the fold?

Expand full comment

That’s snake oil.

Expand full comment

And don’t forget, he sells bibles too. I think we’re in some serious s**t.here. Time for the Dems to Join Pres. Biden and go on the offensive.

Robert🙏🙏😳

Expand full comment

YES!

Expand full comment

Never, ever admit that you are wrong. That’s what he said in an interview with “Sun” in 2005. My momma would have tanned our hides.

Expand full comment

Mine, too, Jeri.

Expand full comment

Any parent that had an ounce of competency and caring

Expand full comment

Any parent that had an ounce of competency and caring

Expand full comment

Those who take a position, and refuse to apologize or alter their position when the evidence is clearly against that stand, are arrogant fools.

A true leader learns from others' mistakes as well as their own,

and accepts wise counsel and expert evidence.

The odds are better that such an intelligent person will arrive at better conclusions and solutions, and handle crises more favorably.

Now if we can only convince the voting citizenry to elect the more qualified candidate(s).

Preferably ones looking forward addressing the future,

rather than going backwards into "the dark ages."

Expand full comment

You gott'a be Roy Cohn.

Expand full comment

It would be a miracle to hear him admit to any of his wrongdoings, but we wait for it…

Expand full comment

It would be a miracle if his voice was stilled, but for the echo of a cell, or eternity.

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t hold my breath if I were you … he will never admit to being wrong about anything!!!

Expand full comment

Here is a piece I wrote for my book, "Donald's Vanity Tantrums." It neatly reveals where and why od TFG. I now hate saying his name anymore. Enjoy.

The Citizen Kane Movie of Tomorrow: Citizen Trump

February 17, 2024

The classic movie Citizen Kane directed, produced, and starred in by Orson Welles will one day in the future, have a remake only this time the main pseudo-fictional character will be Donald Trump. The movie scene will open with a very bloated relic of his former self; uneven orange-smeared makeup slobbed across his face in bed. His overgrown blond hair is found similar to the muss of Boris Johnson’s now showing gray roots from lack of up-to-date hair dye. He periodically wakes from a semi-conscious state at his future dilapidated Mar-a-Lago residence (for lack of having sufficient funds to upkeep the property due to previous constant litigation and losses.) He looks around demanding more Kentucky Fried Chicken wings as low paid personal rush in another bucket and his last word is not “Rosebud” as in the movie Citizen Kane but:

“Stormy.” And the ex 45th president of the United States expires. The camera fades to black then opens at Le Club in the early disco 1970s, a members-only Manhattan nightclub in the East 50s, where models, fashionistas and a variety of Eurotrash (including his wife) went to be seen.

“The government has just filed suit against our company,” said Trump, “saying we discriminated against Blacks. What do you think we should do?”

The Roy Cohn obedient ass-kisser to Senator Joe McCarthy hearings accusing entertainment personalities of being communists shoots back, “Tell them to go to hell and fight the thing in court and let them prove you discriminated against them.”

Roy Cohn has become Trump’s go-to lawyer and fixer.

Cohn admonishes the young Trump to 1. Never settle. Never surrender. 2. Counter-attack, counter-sue immediately. 3. No matter what happens, no matter how deep into the shit you get, claim victory and never admit defeat.

These lessons were found to be the essential attributes of his future self.

And so it was.

Expand full comment

The lead story in the NYT should be "Donald Trump chose not to testify!"

@ Katz. Your book should be entitled "Flim, Flam, Trump." Everything is a con. Primarily he's fleecing his sheep who mistake the wolf as one of them.

His pitch today is that he's the victim. Lies that he's gagged from testifying by a "foreign" corrupt force.

Cohn was in reality a disbarred AIDS riddled sniveling coward as depicted in Angels in America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels_in_America

Expand full comment

Daniel, I saw Angels in America and boy, was it enlightening.

Expand full comment

You really had me, Mr. Katz, you’re imagining a new film about the rotting-away of the evil Orange Idiot, a movie based on an old, amazing masterpiece. Your description was captivating, the possibility fascinating … SCREEEEEEEEEECH!!!

WHY? WHY would you spoil the brilliant ending of a movie, any movie, especially a cinematic masterpiece? Infuriating, one of my fiercest pet peeves. No, not everyone has seen it, not all of us have seen ALL the movies. Yes, I’ve seen Citizen Kane. Several times. NO, there is no excuse for spoiling ANY film. When we spoil endings, we steal the delight, the searing enormity of a moment from another person. There is no excuse for it.

Expand full comment

It’s satire and I’ll plug myself, pretty good sheet.

Expand full comment

Ok Gang, what are we going to do about it meaningfully? Please focus now and for the next 5+ months on registration and turnout of voters 18 to 29! They are focused personally on protecting reproductive rights, effective gun safety legislation, and really battling climate change. Young women will lead them. But I respectfully submit that our focus should be only on truly “competitive” House districts and Senate states. Agree? Brilliant Harvard students and their local recruits are at work right now in 78 competitive CDs and 14 Senate elections as you read this and in more than 1,300 high schools registering tens of thousands of new voters! And in 378 Community Colleges located only in “competitive” CDs and Senate races, they have started the initial push to register and turnout hundreds of thousands of motivated new voters! Time for each of us to lend a helping hand so please contribute generously at www.TurnUp.US and pass their message on to your friends and family! They will make the critical difference! No time to waste to save our democracy, I am sure you agree? Thanks.

Expand full comment

It is tax deductible as a C3 and is nonpartisan based on only those important issues to prospective younger voters!

Expand full comment

Most people learn from their life experiences including their mistakes and failures. Some people learn the wrong lesson and double down on dishonesty. I don't get it because in the long run, that is a self-destructive path. Most of the people in Prof. Richardson's article illustrate that perfectly. Those fellas in the trump costumes outside the courthouse the other day reminded me of that. Everyone who's hitched their wagon to trump is in a world of trouble which will increase and they appear to be totally blind to that fact.

Expand full comment

Do you think it's possible that Trump doesn't care if he wins (no actual on the ground campaign!) because he's just been riling up the base to rebel again when he loses? I don't want to think this but I read something somewhere that started the thought....

Expand full comment

I've seen that thought expressed elsewhere too. It's scary to think that might be the case. If so, hopefully, we'll be better prepared this time.

Expand full comment

Indeed!

Expand full comment

Interestingly, this reminds me of the British royal family: never explain, never apologize. Hm.

Expand full comment

the GOP has been pro-dictators for the past 124 years.. Read Jacob Heilbrunn's "America Last."

Expand full comment

HCR's introduction in her book, "How the South Won the Civil War," makes it clear, IMO, that the oligarchs trick the white Protestant racists into thinking that they are part of them, (i.e., the oligarchs who exploit them financially,) because they are white. They (the whites) reap no benefit for themselves by voting Republican. This ruse was used before the Civil War and is being used now. ("What's the Matter with Kansas" by Thomas Frank.) MAGA is 21st century KKK.

Expand full comment

That book nearly broke my heart. My father, very very poor white trash from Florida, still uses the n word and would be appalled if you called him a racist. He's found religion too. He remembers hearing Hitler on the radio, served in the Air Force, built AWACS for Boeing and had a high security clearance.

He voted for Drumpf. Twice.

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry. He sounds like my recently departed Father-in-Law. USAF veteran who, when tasked with finding qualified Black pilots to join the Air Force One cadre, assumed he couldn't find any because of <pick your racist belief here, he had 'em all> rather than the fact that they had, because of military segregation, not had the same opportunities that he had to learn how to fly. He, too, voted for fpotus twice.

Expand full comment

He won't vote this time!

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

Your father’s conversion sounds eerily like my British mother’s conversion to maga crazy. When she first arrived here she was appalled by how racism was so tolerated and openly accepted, and wrote home about it. My uncle said she was incensed with how Black people were being treated. In the end, she had fully flipped the switch and sounded like the very people she once deplored and voted for trump twice and proudly sneered she would again. Ironically, she watched WWII movies until the day she died, bemoaning the holocaust and fascism without seeing the similarities between trump and hitler. She did regret voting for DeSantis, however.

Expand full comment

Jen, long ago I hoped that the explicit racism his generation (and that of my parents, although my parents weren't at all what I'd call racist -- my dad voted for Obama twice) expressed would die with them. Sadly that is not true, but there is hope that children reject the biases of their parents, as you evidently have.

Expand full comment

I have a sinking feeling that the repubs have a plan to resurrect some version of the KKK if he wins (or if he doesn’t) so that their generational hatred is kept alive in our friends, neighbors, and family.

Expand full comment

Jeri, MAGA is already KKK. Remember the marchers at Charlottesville in 2017? "Jews will not replace us." And the push for a white Protestant autocracy - that's KKK. Timothy Egan's book, "A Fever in the Heartland," about the rise of the KKK in the Midwest in the 1920's leaves one with this takeaway: MAGA is 21st century KKK.

Expand full comment

Richard Sutherland - I read "A Fever in the Heartland" last week. I have about 15 pages with post-its on them, starting with Chapter 9 on page 104. On page 106, Egan discusses Dr. Harry H. Laughlin. Laughlin apparently believed if you allowed strong healthy animals to be crossed only with other strong healthy animals, then "weaker" humans, such as "imbeciles" and degenerates," i.e. homosexuals should be sterilized so as to not weaken the gene pool.

In the book, Egan comments that Indiana passed the world's first eugenic sterilization law in 1907, and that ultimately, about 70,000 people across many states were forcibly sterilized. Other targets for sterilization included Blacks, immigrants, Jews, (the KKK at that time also targeted Catholics, but I don't recall reading if they were advocating sterilizations for Catholics), and those with diseases such as epilepsy. German proto-Nazis were strongly influenced by Laughlin's work.

I could go on, but would rather encourage everyone on this forum to read the book. It's shocking at what so many people were drawn into!

Now we come to Project 2025, and trump's words. I saw a video clip from his appearance in Minnesota last weekend where he said something like, "Racehorses, I like racehorses because they are fast." Sounds innocuous at first, but does it perhaps give a wink and a nod to Laughlin's beliefs, because we all know that racehorses are bred to be fast, cattle and pigs are bred to provide more meat, and turkeys are bred to have larger breasts for more white meat.

If trump wins in November, will we see a resurgent KKK openly advocating for white supremacy? I hope not, and will do whatever I can to convince others of the danger ahead should trump win.

Expand full comment

We ain’t seen nothin yet…

Expand full comment

Heather teaches us it's been here forever, more or less dormant.

The trick the Rpubs want to pull is to make it acceptable. My daughter is furious if I say the word "fat" about a human so there's hope

Expand full comment

I’ll repeat. We ain’t seen nothin yet…

Expand full comment

My dad (1900-1980) lived his entire life in Texas. He could not accept Blacks and Hispanics as “equals.” IMO it was a case of implicit bias. He had never seen a well educated and well dressed African American or Hispanic.

Expand full comment

I’m so sorry Jen. It must be very difficult.

Expand full comment

Sorry for him and you

Expand full comment

Does he love dogs?

Expand full comment

After a fashion.

Expand full comment

I he a sucker or a loser?

Expand full comment

Too true TC. But it goes back a little bit further to at least Benjamin Harrison's Presidency. Many of HCR's newsletter readers have also read "Wounded Knee" which goes into great detail the corruption of the Republican Party led by Harrison.

The Republicans thought they had sidelined Teddy Roosevelt from his progressive ideals, but that all ended when McKinley was assassinated in August, 1901.

We cannot pigeonhole Trump. He needs to be found guilty by our Federal and State justice systems.

Expand full comment

Did Goebbels ever write a book? The Art of Convincing? By then I guess his career was already made and he'd diversified to microphone technique. "McCarthyism" enriched the international language - in naive post-war Australia, we thought above all that the rule of law was particularly one-eyed and merciless in America (with uneasy compassion for the ruined careers). It was never clear that he'd made it all up. You just didn't do that sort of thing. Heather's Letter brings some comfort today.

Expand full comment

I've maintained for decades that Goebbels was the most influential politician of our time.

The grandmaster of political staging.

Expand full comment

Just like Leonard Leo is the puppet master of the far-right members of the Supreme Court.

Expand full comment

I had to look that up -- you are well informed Gary! https://www.propublica.org/article/we-dont-talk-about-leonard-leo-supreme-court-supermajority There is always someone pulling the puppet strings.

Expand full comment

Selecting the best judges that money can buy...

Mr Leo cannot, however, be blamed for living in an immensely powerful country whose institutions have become so threadbare that it can select an extreme security risk as Commander-in-Chief... This, quite apart from all those decades as a notorious conman, systematically cheating contractors... and the IRS... just for starters.

Expand full comment

My post starting "There was another" seems to have vanished. Pity, the attached article was a very detailed (true) story. There's plenty on the internet, but that one was very good. Google "Willi Münzenberg", or combine Willi Münzenberg Rupert Murdoch and see what comes up.

Expand full comment

Shall look it up.

Extraordinary, how much harm one single businessman can do...

Expand full comment

Willi had newspapers and an enormous network. That's where the Murdoch reference ends.

He ended up garotted in a French forest in June 1940.

Expand full comment

Just read in The Jacobin. Excellent article.

I was thinking of Mr. Moloch, of course, when I spoke of damage...

This man clearly understood too much, and paid the price.

Must have influenced Goebbels...

Most of the more respectable US press has a whiff of a capitalist Pravda about it... Yet, given the dirty looks I got in the Deepest Deep South when carrying a copy of the NYT, it might as well have been Pravda...

Expand full comment

Seems to be similarities in trying to leave the Party he once believed it, after he saw what it was becoming (or looked a bit more under the covers at what it secretly had been longer than anyone thought).

Many wouldn't want to believe what they came to see until they tried to leave the party. Political factions shouldn't be like Mob Gangs where lack of loyalty can be deadly.

I learned to consider different perspectives in many ways, but an early one was from a life long Republican that had been Paul Robeson's locker-mate at Rutgers. He wouldn't tolerate careless criticism of such a talented person for something as simple as his skin color, or as deep as why Robeson would not denigrate communism (without looking at the flaws in our own society).

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

George, I’ve become so tired of the phrase “no smoke without fire”. My Trumpist neighbors are fond of proclaiming “why are they investigating Biden if there’s nothing there?” The idea that 45 is just throwing his own actions (hidden or obvious) against the wall has not occurred to them. 45 (and his minions) are counting on the public not being able to keep up the fact checking of the lies so that some sneak through: “See, if it’s not true, why isn’t Biden offering the proof?”

Expand full comment

Thank you Mary -it’s why my mantra has become any meaningful attempt at democracy requires an educated, informed, and engaged society.

We are drowning in gaslighting, lies, propaganda, and hypocrisy. The MAGA/GOP investigates “the weaponization of investigations” while doing exactly that!

Expand full comment

George, it’s like a horde of mosquitoes or moles. We have to mentally fight the feeling of being overwhelmed and do our part to ensure that he isn’t our next president.

Expand full comment

Recently, at a Global democracy conference in Bucharest, I had the honor to meet speakers from Tblisi, Georgia and Kyiv, Ukraine. Their commitment and courage in the face of great danger filled me with the inspiration to keep moving forward.

It’s also important to take extra good care of yourself during these times. As people have reminded us “Do your work, then step back” -give yourself a chance to rest, recover, and then do what you can to continue to patiently help people understand what is happening to the societal aspirations toward democracy, justice, and equality.

Expand full comment

My go to: Stagger Breathing. The only way to keep 10's of measures going solid.

Expand full comment

Yep. We get the government we deserve. :(

Expand full comment

For some reason, I can't message you Richard Sutherland. If you see this comment, please check us out. https://www.veteransforallvoters.org/

Expand full comment

I’m fascinated by the use of the lie in Russia to develop its conviction of empire. The Germans planted the big lie in Russia by sneaking the super conniver Lenin into the chaos of revolution.

Lenin organized the gigantic lie that was Communism and then those theorists, for 70 years, kept forcing the lie over the bodies of millions of dead people.

Kruschev revealed the terrible Stalin lies then Gorbachev blew out the wispy flame only to have Putin resurrect it as Fascism with an Eurasian empire.

Now the cancer of perpetual lying to justify personal power has spread to MAGA America and thoroughly saturated rightwing media we witness the attempted thwarting of justice by the Trump dynamic to develop his empire.

Expand full comment

Thanks Hap -it almost seems that the lying and the political system are just tools in the hands of narcissists who will do anything to concentrate wealth and power.

Expand full comment

From “Freedom and Government” an essay by Bertrand Russell

"The first step in a fascist movement is the combination under an energetic leader of a number of men who possess more than the average share of leisure, brutality, and stupidity.

The next step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent, by emotional excitement on the one hand and terrorism on the other."

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2024/02/28/fools-muzzle/

Expand full comment

The very first time I had the honor to meet Noam Chomsky it was at his office (at the time, at MIT).

Not only was it intimidating to meet Noam (“I’m not worthy was playing on loop in my head”) the feeling was magnified by a poster of Bertrand Russell on Noam’s office wall. A very stern looking Bertrand Russell.

Expand full comment

Oh to have been at Cambridge a hundred years ago. Russell, Hardy, Littlewood, Ramanujan et al. what conversations they must have had.

Expand full comment

If Tucker’s show is being rebroadcast in Russia, does that mean Putin’s Russia is part of the MAGA Unified Reich?

Expand full comment

I'm certain the Prison Apprentice would still be delighted to build Trump Tower Moscow, so yes!

Expand full comment

They licensed their name for Drumf Towers in every other sphere of Influnce countries. But those towers/buildings are vehicles of money laundering for Putin and his oligarghs. To claim the money they have mined out of Russian industry, they first have to get it out of the country. Real estate is the easiest way to do this. Maga likes this because TFG doesn’t need banks any more, just shady Russian investors to buy his condos and licenseee his name with none of his skin in the game. This scheme started after the collapse of the Soviet Union. There are even references to this laundering strategy in popular movies from the 90’s to 2000 when it was still a new phenomenon. ( Boondock Saints, The Equalizer, We Own the Night). New York City, Brighton Beach, Boston, London. The Russian Mafia filled a vacuum on the East Coast after a certain NY prosecutor took down the Italian American Mafia. The big difference with the Russian Mafia is that they work for the Russian foreign intelligence services for additional funding, dirty work, bribes, payoffs, set up compromat, and make donations to political campaigns.

Expand full comment

I'm pretty sure that's from an English translation of Mein Kampf. Goebbels gets credit for actuating the concept but it originated with AH.

Expand full comment

This is very true George 👍and very very scary!!!

Expand full comment

Jesus, Mary and Joseph, where has all the truth and decency gone?

Expand full comment

Nice Q, Christopher.

Truth and decency connect to the human -- to ways the best among us have learned to grow.

But most schools around the world today hew to the dehumanized.

No school in the world can admit the human. They've pretty much all fallen instead for the ur-rational: linear-think, easily-labeled categories, and simple causality by the chronological, sequential, and mechanical. This isn’t life, of course. Not human, not natural. But their opposite, school conceits as packaged, programmed, and abstracted, interchangeable units, all fit the machine-gradable, computer gradable standardized tests beloved of our ruling living dead.

Most schools promote such death trips. But it serves the packages, demagogue or biz ed corporate. Of course. No humans need apply. No humanities apply.

Expand full comment

The lack of emphasis on the liberal arts and the focus on business and stem is leaving half of our thinking capacity behind. The liberal arts is the “if and why”, Stem is the “ what and how” . You need both for a progressive society. John Dewey is very focused on the principle that democracy can only survive with the truth.

Expand full comment

I hope this is not true everywhere. My granddaughter in Prague has a long list of “classics” which is given to students when they enter high school. These books have to be read and the student is required to select some of them on which he or she will answer questions during the final oral exam.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

The digital technology of the information revolution conditions one's world-view toward the binary thinking coded into programming. 🤢

Expand full comment

Or the binary thinking of humans cut off from creative thinking led to the development of binary coding.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

Clever, Sophie. I like it. I am not sure that I am particularly creative, but I do know I have flagged every computer course I have ever taken. Perhaps, I lack that binary aspect. Sure feel out of step with my time. No, not better but painfully obsolete.

Expand full comment

Phil, Christopher & Ned, I suspect the imbalance between linear, either/or computer-code thinking in our schools (and much of our society at large) that you decry is a product of the biological bicameral structure of our brains with left side which harbors most of the activity for speech and "scientific" factual analysis and the right side wherein we perceive larger patterns and meanings and which can hold both sides of paradox, like faith, at once [see The Master and His Emissary by Iain McGilchrist]. This battle between the different ways of thinking between the two sides has been and will likely remain a source of difference between and among educators and all of us to some degree. Your brains have obviously been more able to synthesize the perspectives of both sides of your brains better than most! "In The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, the product of 20 years of research, renowned psychiatrist and writer Iain McGilchrist delves into the world of difference between our two hemispheres and argues that the formal structures of modern society significantly -- and dangerously -- prioritize the left brain, resulting in a culture shackled by rigidity and bureaucracy, driven by self-interest, and ultimately incapacitated by its own imbalance."

Expand full comment

Interesting thoughts here, John. Thanks for sharing the work of McGilcrist.

Expand full comment

I once took a test for right-vs-left brain thinking. Came out hare-brain. 😉😱🥳 Seriously, John, thank you for taking the time to write out a thoughtful and compelling response. ✌️😇🤝

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

P.S. Just re-took free samplers. Still strongly right-brained and strongly introverted (i.e., anti-social with a good vocabulary 😉). The point you make, John, really is what left-brainiacs would be prone to declare presumptively: that it is mission critical.

💡

Three and a half years ago, I re-read 'Theodicy' by Leibniz to see if I could better understand this best-of-all-possible-worlds scheiße.

https://nedmcdletters.blogspot.com/2020/12/letter-167-free-will-and-determinism.html (no expectations of your reading; simply available)

🫣

To my surprise, the second time through, after a generation of my stepping away from the bog, made sense when I applied the framework of the 17th century tome-aine poisoning to modern financial thinking about optimization of investment portfolioes.

😯

What came clear to me -- and this is where your valuable insight comes in, John -- is that free-will is out of balance. In Modern Portfolio Theory, idiosyncrasies (e.g., the personalities of C.E.O.s or H.R. policies) among companies cancel each other out in a portfolio of fifteen-to-twenty diverse stocks or bonds.

🤔

That is to say: in the 'real' world (i.e., the tug-of-war between individualism and determinism), the free wills of individuals tend to cancel each other out to yield a determined and balanced collectivity of will.

⚖️

The problem with our NOT-best-possible -- or sub-optimal -- world may lie in these idiosyncratic factors NOT cancelling each other out. This imbalance occurs in times like this one where left-brain thinking super-ordinates other modes of mind (e.g., the repeated failures of technocrats) or when an ideology seduces a large majority of the people (e.g., nazism / stalinism).

😳

That imbalance creates problems to be redressed, often passively (e.g., crawling into climate change mitigation), always painfully (World War II). The world will re-balance with or without us. That is our choice. 😱

Expand full comment
May 23·edited May 23

In addition to Iain McGilchrist, John, there is Robert Lustig.

The latter wrote "The Hacking of the American Mind: The Science Behind the Corporate Takeover of our Bodies and Brains."

A neural scientist, he's very good especially on how "they" know how to breed and exploit people's addictions to dopamine.

Expand full comment

Angels of America

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0318997/

Expand full comment

Angels IN America, Christopher . . . One of the most important theatrical events to have occurred in the early aughts. And one which the homophobic neofascists and christofascists would probably ban today. It's appalling that, despite all the mess of the first decade of the 21st century, it was in some ways a better world to live in than now for non-cis, non-white, non-penis-wriggling people.

Expand full comment

But the children of Evangelicals are leaving the Evangelical Church. Good news.

Expand full comment

Hope you just made the sign of the cross, Christopher, like a good RC:). Haven’t heard that trio expression in a long time, only when I go back home to MA. Although I do use myself, as a prayer of course:)

Expand full comment

It got shot and run over by GOOD CHRISTIANS.

Expand full comment

Christopher, the "truth" has gone to the "Religious Reich". You heard it here first.

Expand full comment

I am glad you included Joseph. He is often overlooked

Expand full comment

As always, the historical context you provide gives a continuity to events I hadn’t realized were related, such as today’s connection between McCarthy, Cohn and Trump. It shows who Trump is trying to emulate, when he isn’t channeling Hitler.

And in typical Trump fashion, he’s now trying out the newest claim about the FBI search warrant and deadly force by taking something common place and throwing it against the wall to see what sticks. The gag order lies about stopping him from testifying seemed to play well for him but with the trial drawing to a close he’ll need a new one and so he’s trying this on for size. He also often seems to try irrelevant words on for size when describing and insulting people without seeming to understand their actual meaning. Referring to Judge Merchan as conflicted is an odd choice of descriptions to me. To quote from one of my favorite movies, “You keep using that word. I do not think that word means what you think it means.”

Expand full comment

There are many who have known about Cohn mentoring Trump in his early years. Unfortunately, it was well hidden when we needed to know before the 2016 election.

This was written in Politico back in 2019: 'Roy Cohn, who has been described by people who knew him as “a snake,” “a scoundrel” and “a new strain of son of a bitch,” is the subject of a new documentary out this week from producer and director Matt Tyrnauer. It’s an occasion to once again look at Cohn and ask how much of him and his “savage,” “abrasive” and “amoral” behavior is visible in the behavior of the current president. Trump, as has been well-established, learned so much from the truculent, unrepentant Cohn about how to get what he wants, and he pines for Cohn and his notorious capabilities still.'

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/19/roy-cohn-donald-trump-documentary-228144/

Expand full comment

I seem to recall press and magazine hints and implications throughout the long Roy Cohn/tfg association in terms of questionable practices from 1973 until Cohn's aids related death in 1986. Cohn, of course, cut his political chops assisting Senator Joseph McCarthy and turned around to coach tfg and introduce him to such stellar "movers and shakers" as Manafort and Stone. The seeds were there for decades.

Expand full comment

I share your jaw-drop at this whole thing. When you step back to survey who McCarthy, Cohn and Trump really are they become cartoon characters....

Expand full comment

Heather doesn’t comment, just quotes: In an email with a subject line “They were authorized to shoot me—I nearly escaped death,”

So unfortunately not true.

Expand full comment

"Crucially, they make those arguments only in front of television cameras or on podcasts and radio. They refuse to make them under oath in a court of law, where there are penalties for lying."

In consultation with his BFF Bill Barr, Mueller infamously did not subpoena Trump to testify under oath. Instead he allowed Trump to answer questions cherry-picked by Trump's lawyers. Most of the answers were essentially non-answers. Without Trump's testimony under oath there was no way to establish intent and therefore no way to prove conspiracy. It undermined the investigation and permitted Trump et al to scream 'Russia Hoax' - which they still do. Now, in NYC, if only one juror is convinced that the prosecution did not make their case, Trump walks. Meanwhile, the Federalist Society Supreme Court majority is obstructing Jack Smith's case. Justice delayed is justice denied. To we the people.

Expand full comment

Can anyone explain why the Justice Department is slow walking the prosecution of Dump?

Are they afraid of the threat of civil conflict or repercussions if dump regains power. ?

Expand full comment

They’re not. They are following the rule of law.

Expand full comment

Thanks

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

So if the Thomas Supreme Court rules that Trump had total immunity, then Biden can indeed get Trump executed as a danger to American society and never be held accountable. MTG could be included in that cleanup for good measure. I do like the sound of that scenario, but the usually quiet adult on my shoulder is asking, "If so, then where will such actions stop?"

No, we have to beat the f-ers at the ballot box and restore normalcy to our politics.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

Great expression, Jerry: "the usually quiet adult on my shoulder". I've got one of those too who sometimes stops me from ranting on when others want to just move on, at least for the moment.

Unfortunately, these "f-ers" have also managed to ruin our justice system following years of careful planning (credit where credit is due), so we now have only the ballot box to save us.

And who knows what is in store for us on election day if the results are anything less than a Democratic landslide? The pressure is on all of us now.

Expand full comment

I have one too. She begs me to keep my mouth shut around my husbands vast (catholic) family who are in the trump delirium (save 1 aunt - that makes 3 of us)

Expand full comment

As when my neighbor came over for a chat sporting his “I Identify as NonBidenary” tee shirt. I suggested he turn it inside out, then dropped the matter.

Expand full comment

Ugh!

Expand full comment

Humor in the service of evil. Interesting.

Expand full comment

Yeah. Fun life here in the country. The stupidity hurts.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

I agree, Jerry. Promoting a belief that the courts are going to save the American people from authoritarian rule always has always been a disservice. The media and the two parties have colluded in distracting the citizens with a delusional fantasy. If voters do not turn out in record masses, they most certainly will be ruled by an authoritarian realm in which oligarchs govern and wealth buys a governance of unbounded privileges over the masses of workers. Originalism embraces a Constitution without a Bill of Rights.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

WRITTEN ELSEWHERE. DRs LEE & COX RICARDSON should collaborate. Their aggregated knowledge would not only be compelling, but also frightening. Dr Lee explains how Trump's mental illness feeds ever more outrageous lies and enables similarly anti-republican behaviors from people like the preppy whore, Tucker Carlson.

Unfortunately, the Goldwater Rule is preventing experts from informing the rest of us just how precarious things are right now. The Goldwater Rule forbids psychiatrists from making analytical judgements about public figures whom they have not met directly.

😱

Dr Bandy Lee is one psychiatrist, on the nature of violence, who really has stuck her neck out and been punished by the American Psychiatric Association (#AmericanPsychiatricAssociation) for violating the 'Goldwater Rule' (i.e., making a professional evaluation without direct contact with the analysand who is a public figure).

https://bandyxlee.substack.com/p/trump-contagion-past-and-future/

She is writing a series of essays about what she labels as the #TrumpContagion, of which Mr Carlson, for example, is manifestly both a carrier and symptom; she perseveres in defiance of, and as an exile from, the A.P.A.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-pacific-heart/202405/responsible-dialogue-on-the-goldwater-rule-must-continue

Needless to say, Dr Lee has the bravery of a whistle-blower in facing adverse professional consequences. What the #APA overlooks is that . . .

> readers of analyses like those of Dr Lee can think for themselves; as well as,

> one can detect when a professional crosses the invisible line-of-bias between opportune counsel for the rest of us AND opportunism at the expense of the rest of us.

Expand full comment

Dozens of 501(c)(3) organizations violate the Johnson Amendment. Why is the Justice Department along with the Treasury Department not revoking their tax exempt status. If they want to denigrate Joe Biden and the Democrats, then make them pay taxes.

Once their status is revoked billions of dollars in taxes would come due from the white-Christian Nationalist churches in property taxes and income taxes.

The Johnson Amendment is a provision in the U.S. tax code, since 1954, that prohibits all 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations from endorsing or opposing political candidates. Section 501(c)(3) organizations are the most common type of nonprofit organization in the United States, ranging from charitable foundations to universities and churches. The amendment is named for then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, who introduced it in a preliminary draft of the law in July 1954.

Expand full comment

I support enforcement of the Johnson Amendment but enforcement must be consistently and uniformly enforced to maximize effectiveness, not simply because, “If they want to denigrate Joe Biden and the Democrats, then make them pay taxes.”

Expand full comment

Which is not an easy thing to do. But I agree with you. Several "churches" put out a voting guide which is supposed to be non-partisan, but they only recommend candidates from one party with suspect reasons for ALWAYS voting for the candidates of their choosing. I think if you took away the 501(c)(3) status of a few of the obvious candidates (see documentary BAD FAITH) where week after week they rail on only Democrat candidates and then very briefly mention the Bible.

Not to pick on the mega-churches, but why should someone have to listen to political BS when they go to church to worship.

Expand full comment

There’s also 501(c)(4) which allows advocacy. Many are offshoots of entities established as (c)(3). For example Planned Parenthood has a (c)(4) arm. https://afj.org/resource/comparison-of-501c3-and-501c4-permissible-activities/

Expand full comment

At the very least, 501(c)4s, acting in contravention of the Johnson Amendment, should impose an income tax on the 501(c)3s funding them.

Expand full comment

Ned, a factor that seems to be left out of the Goldwater Rule folks is that we have a public figure here....who has repeatedly and consistently shown us, in public, his behavior dynamics for years!! We HAVE " met" him; his deeply disturbed personality is obvious to even us non- psychiatrists!

Expand full comment

Dr Lee makes the same point. She feels ethically bound to hoist her flag against Trump. So her career and A.P.A. be damned she is going to do it. Perhaps that moxxy comes from her graduate degree in theology.

https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B072YQ8TYZ/about

Expand full comment

Yes! Strongly recommend reading Dr Lee's Substack.

Expand full comment

I just read yesterday's post. I'm not sure I can bear more of this. My hair is already on fire.

Expand full comment

Remember there are more of us than them, as much as I hate dividing this country into us versus them.

Expand full comment

I feel depressed, but ready to fight if I have to.

Expand full comment

We can't begin to handle a problem as large as these challenges to democracy without first identifying the form and function of those challenges. You

might want to wrap an ice towel around your head and keep going 😉 and you are not at all alone.

Expand full comment

"I nearly escaped death"

Oh how I wish that was true, since it would mean the pus bag full of shit was DEAD.

The stupid fucking moron is too ignorant to be able to use English, not that the lifetime residents of Flyover Loserville would notice, being ignorant morons themselves.

Expand full comment

A cousin just sent this to us:

Morality Test

Are you as moral as you think you are?

This test only has one question, but it's a very important one.

By giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally.

The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which

you will have to make a decision. Only you will know the results so

your answer needs to be honest.

THE SITUATION:

You are in Florida, Miami to be specific. There is chaos all around

you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of

biblical proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major

newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The

situation is nearly hopeless. You're trying to shoot career-making

photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some

disappearing under the water.

THE TEST:

Suddenly you see a man in the water. He's fighting for his life, trying

not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer. Somehow the man

looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it is.

It's Donald Trump!

At the same time, you notice that the raging waters are about to take

him under forever.

YOU HAVE TWO OPTIONS:

You can save the life of Donald Trump or you can shoot a dramatic

Pulitzer Prize-winning photo documenting the death of one of the

world's most powerful Republican man hell-bent on the destruction of

America.

THE QUESTION:

Here's the question, and please give an honest answer.

Would you select high contrast colour film or would you go with the

classic simplicity of black and white?

Expand full comment

😂😂😂👏👏👏

Expand full comment

Question the Question: How many lives can you save if you let him drown?

Expand full comment

Black and white

Expand full comment

Thanks, TCinLA. My thoughts about the situation, EXACTLY!!!

Expand full comment

Tell us how you really feel TC. /S

Expand full comment

Zinnnnnngggg!

Expand full comment

Tell us how you really feel, TC!

Expand full comment

Trump stepped in it again - so much for "presidential immunity", no?

Expand full comment

Autocratic, demagogue, dictatorial regimes always depend on massive lying.

The lies always fit labels for nefarious "others," always other groups, as if we can only live life by seeing groups-only and accompanying scripted slogans only.

This of course forecloses on any schools ever teaching any real humanities, where things get messy with characters having nuances, contradictions, complicated history, and other contingencies.

So is it a sign of today's world, mostly run by billionaires, that schools around the world debase to the vulgarity of the rich? Or debase to the parallel vulgarity of religious packagers of hate and resentment?

Expand full comment

“Autocratic, demagogue, dictatorial regimes always depend on massive lying.” True, but usually they are not believed, so they depend even more on terror and arbitrariness. Their effect on the truth is to make everything and everyone suspect.

Expand full comment

Depends, Sophie.

If people have upbringing for decency -- which includes interests in artists who can see better than us -- people will have independence from the liars and the vulgar.

Expand full comment

"...the parallel vulgarities and religious packagers of hate and resentment"

SPOT ON!!

Expand full comment

Or the distraction of celebrity culture.

Expand full comment

You often generalize to all schools. My granddaughter recently told me "I still take humanities," when I asked her if she knew what it was.

Expand full comment

Let's measure in application, Kathy.

Many "know" humanities as exotic, marginalized, decorative-only -- and have also learned that one never uses any, never cites any apropos of anything.

Even on Heather's site here, please count how often any citations of any novels, memoirs, films, songs, or other arts.

If we're honest, more of us would feel like Doctor Zhivago in "The Forest Brotherhood" chapter where, abducted by a partisan group and forced to serve as its doctor, he's also forced continuously to hear nothing but the banalities of slogans, abstractions, and other wonk language of that time.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the recap of the McCarthy era, Professor. I was born in 1952, so had no knowledge of that news of the time.

As for 2024, as exhausting as it is to do, we must keep pushing the truth and pushing back against the lies.

Expand full comment

Thank you Professor Heather Cox Richardson.

I’m voting against these MAGA punks, bullies, Nazi’s …….

Enough talk, Vote blue, for Biden / Harris 2024

Expand full comment

I read HCR's letter as soon as it came in during the wee hours (and obviously before my coffee) - always a big, big mistake for my ability to go back to sleep! So, I agree with all the early comments and will now get back to some REM where trump and the batshit crazies don't exist!

Expand full comment

I have an ironclad rule: HCR, Hubbell, and Joyce always wait til morning.

Expand full comment

Early to bed, early to rise. Walk the dog, drink the coffee, THEN and only then dive into the analysis of those three and more. But now I have a problem. A good one. There are so many terrific newsletters on Substack now. How to read them and still live a normal life?

Ooops. Almost 8:00 am. Got to feed the dog.

Expand full comment

Bill, I hear you. I subscribe (pay) to several more than I should, and grab several of the free ones. No wonder the weeds are winning in my yard... <my "yard" is 1/2 of a city lot that boarders on an unimproved city park. I get lots of weeds from that park. This month alone I have filled my pickup with weeds 6 times and hauled them to the place where I pay to drop weeds/scrap wood/brush/clay only to go back through the line and get good soil, mulch, and wood chips.>

Expand full comment

I agree . . . then every once in a while, I break my own rule :)

Expand full comment

I can break it with Joyce, but never Heather if I want any sleep.

Expand full comment

Me too. My own thoughts are scary enough

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, many of us take TFFG and other Republican demons to bed with us.

What's your trick?

Expand full comment

Dry Bar Comedy!! :)

Expand full comment

I'm not awake during the "wee hours," so I don't see HCR's letter until the early morning, after I've had my coffee, showered, and dressed. Even so, my husband wonders how I can read it as my first task of the day.

Expand full comment

I'm with you, Ellen. Heading for cup number two here...

Expand full comment

It's not just what Trump stands for that should eliminate him as a choice for president, but how he's trying to get re-elected, which starkly exposes his criminal character. His ingenuity at manufacturing lies boggles my mind as does the stalwart foolishness of his supporters in believing them.

Expand full comment

Very interesting the direct link of Roy Cohen from McCarthy to Trump. I recall Trump asking aloud “Where’s my Roy Cohen”?

Expand full comment

The courts move so slowly that Trump is on to the next con before the court rules and the earlier con is old news.

Expand full comment

Not if he's convicted. There are no grounds to acquit Trump so he will either be found guilty or it will be a hung jury. If it's a hung jury, someone from the jury will likely tell us why and who so they can retry TFFG. That would truly be an ugly result (to retry) but it could happen before November. And if he is found guilty TFFG will appeal. Hopefully, his appeal would/will be denied and we can get on with his prison time.

So many great choices of prison in NY for the orange menace!

Expand full comment

But what is the maximum prison sentence? The minimum?

Expand full comment

It depends on what counts he is found guilty - if he is.

Expand full comment

Great post - thanks. Regrettably, Donald J. Trump appears to be above the law. "At no point during his long career as a celebrity real estate mogul and businessman has Trump faced any meaningful consequences for his fraudulent, even criminal, behavior. He has operated for decades with a shield of impunity crafted from his shamelessness, his celebrity and his craven willingness to intimidate critics with litigation or even just the threat of litigation.

What is striking is the extent to which this shield of impunity has only been strengthened by the political and legal institutions of the United States." Jamelle Bouie, New York Times, as quoted in my blog at https://natpernick.substack.com/p/who-will-challenge-donald-trump-as .

What will happen if he becomes President? Who will challenge him them and incur not only his threats but those of the Proud Boys and his other supporters? It's time for all of us to get more politically active - we cannot do everything but we can do a little more than we are doing now.

Expand full comment
May 22·edited May 22

Don’t forget he’s a master at delay. He knows how to exhaust his opponents resources and money.

The 1980’s tax fraud case was where he took NY tax payer money for trump tower with contractual promise of payback. NY found his books so confusing, and surprise, a flood in the basement where records were kept - and finally gave up.

Today he is shocked that USA vs trump hasn’t collapsed under all the high dollar lawyer motions trying to bury in paper the cases. He never contemplated these felonies by a former President are so serious they can’t just expire and be swept under. He wants his “get out of jail” card simply because he should.

America can not afford to let these cases die on the vine. Our Constitutional framework hangs on law vs. popularity contests.

Expand full comment

Today's analysis, linking the current events in Trump's Manhattan courthouse to McCarthyism, was particularly interesting. I would like to know more about how "up to 20 million people...saw him (McCarthy) for what he was - a vicious, lying bully - and most of them turned against him." We need to do the same with Trump and his cronies. In the age of the Internet, what is the best way to do that? Who needs to do what by when (certainly before the November election) to expose Trump as a weak fraud and convicted felon who was never qualified to be president?

Expand full comment

I don’t have an account on truth social - should we to rebut the lies? Or would it harm worse than it helps?

Expand full comment

My guess is it would only endanger you & those close to you. I'm afraid it is going to have to come from within the beast itself. It's those people that "believe" in trump that need to see that they are being taken. We can point it out all day & night but until THEY see the light themselves it's not going to break the fever.

I'd say we should go after FOX & other outlets but FOX owes millions from court cases & it hasn't shut them up.

When MAGA deports 15 million people or tries to that's when it will come home to roost. When there will be no one to tend the fields, harvest & process the food we eat that it might sink in that they have been lied to over & over. When all those "pesky" immigrants are gone & our economy plummets only then will they realize what following trump means!

Expand full comment

Thank you for your reply from Paris. It's questionable whether having an intellectual argument over Truth Social or any SNS service would be effective, but it might work. A high profile Democrat could be a good spokesperson.

Expand full comment

The first thing that comes to mind is that a behavioral standard is always appropriate no matter what the preparation; that is the preparation for some, and I don't mean just people that other people look down on. Everybody, every body has a story. And our stories make our livable, understandable and able to move towards general agreements that promote the general health of everyone in the country, even the tribe. There are samples and examples of this working throughout history and herstory.

It is more than time for this leading nation of the world to promote and support and learn from any and every workable form of civil discussion, all ideas are up for a good look at what they actually do in reality, which is the test really.

No one is born sinful. Period.

Stressed? Always. Which is why and how and wherefore that we need a kinder world everywhere. And anybody can do this, can contribute.

We were made for this; nature abhors a vacuum and we are part of nature.

Expand full comment

Before the advent of mass bombing from the air, there were two ways of defeating an enemy holed up behind its own fortifications and which refuses to fight in the open. To starve the enemy by blockading its supply lines or to sap its walls from underground coupled with artillery or projectiles. Good generals did all that. What they didn’t do was send warriors behind enemy walls without a plan to bring down the enemy’s fortifications and send strong back-up for their people inside.

Expand full comment

Short clips of McCarthy and Cohn talking nonsense followed by clips of Cohn and Trump and then Trump now - repeat, repeat, repeat

Expand full comment

These images would be powerful.

Expand full comment

If he would have taken the stand and it was televised and he was under oath, it might have been an opportunity for the voting public to see him for what he is.

Expand full comment