I support enforcement of the Johnson Amendment but enforcement must be consistently and uniformly enforced to maximize effectiveness, not simply because, “If they want to denigrate Joe Biden and the Democrats, then make them pay taxes.”
I support enforcement of the Johnson Amendment but enforcement must be consistently and uniformly enforced to maximize effectiveness, not simply because, “If they want to denigrate Joe Biden and the Democrats, then make them pay taxes.”
Which is not an easy thing to do. But I agree with you. Several "churches" put out a voting guide which is supposed to be non-partisan, but they only recommend candidates from one party with suspect reasons for ALWAYS voting for the candidates of their choosing. I think if you took away the 501(c)(3) status of a few of the obvious candidates (see documentary BAD FAITH) where week after week they rail on only Democrat candidates and then very briefly mention the Bible.
Not to pick on the mega-churches, but why should someone have to listen to political BS when they go to church to worship.
I support enforcement of the Johnson Amendment but enforcement must be consistently and uniformly enforced to maximize effectiveness, not simply because, “If they want to denigrate Joe Biden and the Democrats, then make them pay taxes.”
Which is not an easy thing to do. But I agree with you. Several "churches" put out a voting guide which is supposed to be non-partisan, but they only recommend candidates from one party with suspect reasons for ALWAYS voting for the candidates of their choosing. I think if you took away the 501(c)(3) status of a few of the obvious candidates (see documentary BAD FAITH) where week after week they rail on only Democrat candidates and then very briefly mention the Bible.
Not to pick on the mega-churches, but why should someone have to listen to political BS when they go to church to worship.