Oh no, he can lie just by thinking about it, the same way he declassifies documents and changes them into golf course plans. That's what was in all those boxes at Mar-a-liego
Oh no, he can lie just by thinking about it, the same way he declassifies documents and changes them into golf course plans. That's what was in all those boxes at Mar-a-liego
I didn't know General Milley designed golf courses! Since he claimed the papers he held were written by Milley. Maybe Milley should take that up after he retires. :-)
What is the constitutional authority for presidents with regarding to declassification of documents? What was the classification of the document in question? What does the Presidential records act say? Is it criminal or civil?
What is the history? Has anyone ever been prosecuted and if not, why? What was Comey's rationale for not prosecuting Clinton?
Why would Heather address such questions when any well-informed reader already knows the answers? You're a propagandist intent on sowing confusion, not clarity.
What a stupid comment. A historian posts about a Supreme Court decision, where she has no idea about the law, yet offers an opinion she lifted from another site.
There is no scholarship or original thought? That's a joke.
And Comey didnt prosecute Clinton as the FBI found she was innocent (twice - once right beforecthe election) . Besides, the 33000 email figure was pulled out of the air just like all REPUBLICAN'TS alternative facts and kind of pales beside the 500k+ emails that George W Bush deleted.
Oh no, he can lie just by thinking about it, the same way he declassifies documents and changes them into golf course plans. That's what was in all those boxes at Mar-a-liego
I didn't know General Milley designed golf courses! Since he claimed the papers he held were written by Milley. Maybe Milley should take that up after he retires. :-)
ЁЯдгЁЯдгЁЯдгЁЯдгЁЯдг
What is the constitutional authority for presidents with regarding to declassification of documents? What was the classification of the document in question? What does the Presidential records act say? Is it criminal or civil?
What is the history? Has anyone ever been prosecuted and if not, why? What was Comey's rationale for not prosecuting Clinton?
Why would Heather address such questions when any well-informed reader already knows the answers? You're a propagandist intent on sowing confusion, not clarity.
Don't feed the troll. This guy is a cut and paste propagandist who pops up there parroting right wing talking points, presumably to "own the libs."
And someone paid at least $50 for him to do so
Try looking it up yourself.
AMEN !!!
What a stupid comment. A historian posts about a Supreme Court decision, where she has no idea about the law, yet offers an opinion she lifted from another site.
There is no scholarship or original thought? That's a joke.
BTW I did read the opinion. Did you?
Yes, I did. Fool. You're a condescending asshole to assume that others commenting here have not
Showing your intelligence yet again.
What did the opinion say? In legal terms?
And Comey didnt prosecute Clinton as the FBI found she was innocent (twice - once right beforecthe election) . Besides, the 33000 email figure was pulled out of the air just like all REPUBLICAN'TS alternative facts and kind of pales beside the 500k+ emails that George W Bush deleted.
Clinton did not have classified document on the server.
How can you be so stupid. Its embarrassing. Time to get out of your bubble.
I've attached a video of FBI director James Comey detailing the SPECIFICS of the classified
material found on Hillary's server. At least 110 emails including 8 that were "Top Secret", 36 contained "Secret Information".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79txF6dUBwE
The FBI believed her server was hacked because of negligence.
After the server was subpoenaed Hillary scrubbed the server and destroyed all of her cell phones.
Why infest Heather's commenting section with your "important info.".......No one is interested. Do you have no subscribers to your James's Newsletter?
Sorry. You are incorrect, but I won't accuse you of being stupid. Name calling belongs to a certain group.
What do call a person, when faced with a video of Jim Comey testifying under OATH before
Congress "that Hillary had classified emails on her server", says its not true?
Delusional? Stupid? Idiot? Take your pic. What they can't be called is truthful. Its just further proof that TRUTH is not a left wing value.
Yet again I've pasted the video of Jim Comey's testimony before Congress.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79txF6dUBwE