What a stupid comment. A historian posts about a Supreme Court decision, where she has no idea about the law, yet offers an opinion she lifted from another site.
There is no scholarship or original thought? That's a joke.
What a stupid comment. A historian posts about a Supreme Court decision, where she has no idea about the law, yet offers an opinion she lifted from another site.
There is no scholarship or original thought? That's a joke.
And Comey didnt prosecute Clinton as the FBI found she was innocent (twice - once right beforecthe election) . Besides, the 33000 email figure was pulled out of the air just like all REPUBLICAN'TS alternative facts and kind of pales beside the 500k+ emails that George W Bush deleted.
What a stupid comment. A historian posts about a Supreme Court decision, where she has no idea about the law, yet offers an opinion she lifted from another site.
There is no scholarship or original thought? That's a joke.
BTW I did read the opinion. Did you?
Yes, I did. Fool. You're a condescending asshole to assume that others commenting here have not
Showing your intelligence yet again.
What did the opinion say? In legal terms?
And Comey didnt prosecute Clinton as the FBI found she was innocent (twice - once right beforecthe election) . Besides, the 33000 email figure was pulled out of the air just like all REPUBLICAN'TS alternative facts and kind of pales beside the 500k+ emails that George W Bush deleted.