No problem. I think you are right. There are other gaps in the methodology applied in the polling by 'The Economist'. One biggie is that the "fundamentals" used based upon incumbency does not account for third parties.
No problem. I think you are right. There are other gaps in the methodology applied in the polling by 'The Economist'. One biggie is that the "fundamentals" used based upon incumbency does not account for third parties.
No problem. I think you are right. There are other gaps in the methodology applied in the polling by 'The Economist'. One biggie is that the "fundamentals" used based upon incumbency does not account for third parties.