Yet another friend called me tonight - this one from Mississippi - and thanked me for sharing your letters with her. She said it calmed her down. That's four friends in the past week - also women in Missouri, Illinois and Pennsylvania - all said the same - you are an anchor in a storm. Thank you for your work.
Also a sailor: anchor in a storm works. Why? When we seek safe harbor from a storm the harbor is but a step in weathering the storm. The anchor, also known as ground tackle, is crucial in holding one’s place during the storm. The anchor, if of adequate size and is well set, will keep your vessel from crashing into other vessels or the shore and other obstacles.
We in this space, created by Heather, are in the safe harbor mode, weathering the storm. Heather creates the anchor we need to stay focused on what the storm is bringing and is providing us with the tools to fight and hold our ground for our democracy. For this I am thankful.
Another good suggestion I heard at a wonderful retreat this weekend: "When the storm comes, the thing to do is get low in the boat." A stable base is what's called for especially in times of trouble.
Heather: I’ve brought this up before as a “chat on politics “ question to you before the attempted coup on the Capitol. It probably came across as an extreme notion then, but in light of what’s come to pass— which most never thought would happen in the USA— I think it’s worth serious consideration now.
The unfolding of events in DC is unpredictable yet worrisome. As a safety net emergency measure for extraordinary times, I think it would be prudent for Biden/Harris to take the oath of office now that they are president elect and VP elect. The oath can be taken any time in that it is not written in the Constitution that it be done January 20 at noon when Trump’s presidency and power ends and Biden/Harris’ begins. There is precedent for this though not for these unprecedented circumstances. It is taken privately with a Bible, with a judge administering it plus a witness.
Nobody can predict what will be happening at noon January 20 when power shifts and the transition is complete except for the oath-taking. If chaos reigns, Biden/Harris will already have taken the oath and are in power. He can do whatever is necessary as President. The inauguration ceremony might have to be postponed. Who knows. Whenever it takes place, Biden/Harris can publicly take the oath of office again. The early taking of the oath is strictly a safety net for he is still powerless till noon January 20. No?
I don't know, Monet...this comment was meant to test the waters as to the notion's zaniness or merit. So far, the response has been mostly positive. I know who to ask as to who to contact. Thanks for sharing your reaction.
Thanks, Carla. I'm going to find out from a Dem official who would know who I should direct it to in DC. It's probably already been suggested and considered, but you never know.
This happened in TN in the late 70s. The governor-elect, Lamar Alexander, was sworn in early bc the outgoing governor, Ray Blanton, was, among other crimes, selling pardons from the governor’s mansion.
I enjoy the concept but I think it would be empty symbolism until Trump’s power ceases.
We already can anticipate a more legal form of Governance from the President Elect Biden but his predecessor can wrack havoc until noon January 20, 2021 and I think we should focus on curbing that wreckage.
I agree that it's an interesting concept, Hap. Your response suggests this approach has shades of being less than legal. I truly don't intend it to be. Some constitutional expert has determined that it's legal for there are several precedents on record for early oath-taking as private (this doesn't mean secret) and later public, so indications are it's above board. I don't see symbolism entering the picture till noon, January 20, cuz Bidenhas no power till Trump relinquishes it. Noon, January 20, and not one fraction of a second later. No one can predict what will be happening then. Unforeseeable. Whatever the situation might be--worst case scenario, possibly chaotic--having a sworn-in president would be covered. Then it's just the ticking of the clock past noon that changes everything. No?
As to havoc and wreckage, I'm crossing my fingers that impeachment will neutralize Trump. That's the focus.Then there's January 17 to consider....
Good idea, Martha. Although circumstances are vastly different, your suggestion brought to my mind the iconic image of LyndonJohnson being sworn in as president on the airplane with Jackie Kennedy, in her blood-soaked pink suit, and others surrounding him.
I wondered if they could take the oath privately earlier in the day on the 20th and then have a "redo" for the public once it's safer for all....i.e the thugs have been reined in and the pandemic is less a threat.
Two Presidents at the same time, even for just a week or so? Not a good idea. The Roman Catholic Church had such an experience with multiple Popes toward the end of the Fourteenth centry and it didn't work very well.
I don't think so, Jacob. Biden would be powerless till noon. Conflict not possible. It's just something that occurred to me that might have merit in uncertain times.
Those popes vs antipope. Fighting over the spiritual kingdom of heaven.Power plays.
Not a bad idea. It has been done before in TN but that state's Constitution didn't mandate a specific day at that time. Lamar Alexander had been elected but the previous governor had been selling Clemencies for cash and the state gov't wanted to stop that and swore him in early. The U.S. Constitution does by Amendment 20: "AMENDMENT XX
Passed by Congress March 2, 1932. Ratified January 23, 1933. Section 1.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin. "
Note: Article I, section 4, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of this amendment. In addition, a portion of the 12th amendment was superseded by section 3.
Section 1.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
I've been writing my senators (Ds) requesting they initiate at least a censure of the six slimes lead by Hawley and Cruz and not allow the Senate to go back to business as usual after these roaches crawled out from under their rusted bean cans to de-legitimize the voices of tens of thousands of Arizona and Pennsylvania folks who cast legal votes which were counted legally. I'm so disgusted with Cruz calling out Biden for not healing the country Cruz has been hacking apart for years with lies and sneers. Trump is a terrible reminder of all that is not honorable and positive in our country, but Cruz and his like are even more despicable for wanting to lick up Trump's crumbs and profit from Trump's false cult. Enough, sorry...
I've come to realize Congressman, like the Potus, can be fooled by their FB feeds. Choosing what has more likes & shares, than what real people are saying. Do they not understand what BOT amplification is and how it works? Or are they in on that too? They seem to miss that they take an oath to serve all the people, not just the irrational and loud.
"Too often we honor swagger and bluster and the wielders of force" -RFK 1968
Either way, the people may need to devise new strategies of being heard, new ways connecting and building justice into something new, that can overwhelm the metrics that political leaders look to measure before they act. I think this space is one of those where these new strategies will be born.
Could it be as easy as infiltrating the social sites that spew the lies and continue an onslaught of truth? If we all do it, can we figuratively scream them down?
This is really insightful and thought-provoking for me, Ted. Thank you. You are posing a strategy area that is positive, possible and very apt for 2021.
I quit Twitter yesterday. It wasn't that useful to me anyway. I would like to quit Facebook, but I don't want to miss HCR's twice-weekly chats. But if she moved them elsewhere, I could well do without Facebook.
I quit FB this past year for good and actually deleted everything. I’m so happy I did because I will not support its business practices for one minute. I have found that HCRs YouTube works fine for me. It may not be in ‘real time’ like FB, but I don’t even think about that.
That's a good point. I wish her chats would post to YouTube sooner, though. The latest I have there just now is Jan 5. I can't yet do without more timely doses!
Absolutely! This is a critical topic.. I went on Twitter in the first place in order to discover good news sources. Honestly, I just got more confused. I got some good pointers form you, Ted and also from others, and I think I now have a good range of sources. I pay for some of these, and I'm willing to, but many other people would not be willing, and good news sources should be freely and easily available to everyone. I used to read the papers at the public library (where I worked for years.) With social media and especially now with Covid, the library is less helpful or available. I"m also older, and I live in a very small community with limited library services. We don't have a television, but I have my laptop, and my husband has his iPad. He's a Brit, and he likes the Guardian. He seems to get news more quickly than I do!
1.Lie, Lie all the time, 24/7.... about everything and everyone
2. When accused of lying attack & accuse them for lying.
3. When everyone is confused and doesn't know the truth anymore, enough people submit to the mystic of the dear leader completes the process and democracy is killed.
Every wonder why there are so many conspiracy theories? That's to confuse and throw you off the trail as the fascist commit real Conspiracy Plots to overthrow democracy. Flood the the zone with so much mis information, create fatigue and doubt in every person, every institution, and every process. Then capitalize when the timing is right.
Imagine if 911 happed 9 11 2020..... during DT presidency this year.
Hey, Becky. I joined Twitter a few years ago so I could interact with the show Survivor. Never understood how it worked, and still don't! Would you kindly tell me how to quit? Like you, I'm keeping FB because of Dr. R's chats.
Hi Lynell. Well, I can't exactly remember, and I can't go there now to find out, but it was not "quit" or "unsubscribe" but something that sounded less final, and I can't think of the word that was used. It gave me the feeling that all my tweets would consider to exist somewhere, but I didn't see any other option. Probably I should research this. Maybe when I get a burst of energy. I feel so drained right now!
Richard, censoring 45 and every one of the congress people who stood with him to contest our fair election is a fast way to shut them up for awhile. I think the impeachment and/or 25th are doomed and will overshadow the start of Biden's term. Anything B might do that is positive will be lost in the mayhem of doing 'something' to 45. As disgusted as I am by what is happening now and HAS BEEN happening for years, I would be okay with censur and then pop the popcorn to see what SDNY et al do on 1/20/21 at 12:01 (interesting number sequence, eh? Any numerologists out there?)
Also, I don't want an inauguration on the steps of the Capitol. Do it in a studio and let us all watch them, safely out of any assassins sites.
Every time I start thinking about the inauguration and safety I become uncomfortable. I will do my best to hold a positive vision for that day wherever it is held. Like many of us, we are shaken and concerned. As for trump and his followers, they must be held accountable ASAP!
We cannot let fear and insecurity prevent us from doing what is the legal and morally proper thing to do. And no Republican would, most assuredly. They do not let such things stop them from doing the illegal and immoral.
The 25th Amendment should be invoked, and Trump must be impeached. It is the course of integrity, and it is the legal and moral course to take.
We are all supremely fortunate to have found Dr. Richardson’s monumental contribution to our one day even greater nation. That possibility still exists, in part, due to her work dissecting the events of these past 15 or so months. Thank you, Professor.
To all my co-grape pickers in Heather’s vineyard, I feel a deep obligation to share this rather blunt article, assessing the response to Wednesday’s insurrection. It carries an eye-opening message that this virtual community, especially, needs to heed and remember.
With respect, I take issue with the thrust of the article – not with many of the underlying points it makes, but with the method it employs.
Following a summary of the events of Wednesday afternoon, the author writes, “Politicians, pundits and cable news journalists expressed bewilderment at how this could be happening in the United States.”
IMO, the crux of the article is represented in these observations:
“Zaheer Ali, an oral historian and adjunct instructor at New York University, said that Americans’ collective inability to reckon with their own history has led to such problematic cherry-picking about what the United States represents.
“I was more frustrated by the news commentary that sought to frame this as so unusual, unpredictable, unexpected, un-American, etc. This exceptionalism that says ‘this doesn’t happen here’ or ‘this is not who we are’ ignores the history of America,” Ali said.
“Subscribing to the false narrative of American exceptionalism has led us to be blind to this part of our legacy as a country,” he added. This fallacy has led some journalists and other observers to look outside the U.S. for reference points in order to understand the current political situation instead of reflecting internally.
That the United States has a troubled history of racism and political violence, is undeniable, except by those who deny it. But I take exception to the broad characterizations this article presents, which appear to be grounded in political grievance and commercial expediency.
The world was shocked by the events of January 6th – is it so surprising that reporters covering the unfolding events expressed dismay at what was taking place? Never in America’s history had citizens stormed the Capitol. This was an unprecedented event. Nitpicking at the live coverage of that day for failing to adequately reflect on the historical antecedents to these events, is grossly unfair – holding journalists to unrealistic standards.
Expecting people caught in a moment of profound drama to reflect, is a tall order. The writer then leaps from the contemporaneous reactions of journalists and others to the unfolding events, to a broad indictment that their language is evidence of their blindness to the violence that has been a recurring element of America’s political narrative. The article may be a clever exercise in political rhetoric, but it comes across to this reader as a cheap shot.
One need only scan the world’s newspapers of that day and the following morning, to see that political leaders of all stripes were shocked by what had happened.
The following statement was made by Hassan Rouhani:
In a televised speech Thursday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said events at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday are evidence Western democracy is fragile and vulnerable to populism. He said, “A populist has arrived, and he has led his country to disaster over these past four years."
Rohani added he hoped “the next occupants of the White House” will “restore the country to a position worthy of the American nation, because the American nation is a great nation."
Many here have long been concerned, if not convinced, that something like the riot of January 6th was inevitable. Many believe we have not seen the worst of it. But that does not preclude our being deeply shocked as the events unfolded before our eyes, nor does our shock imply that we are unaware of the history of violence and racism in the country and its politics.
One of the reasons we are gathered in this forum, is that we want to understand how we got to where we are today. And the truth is the article - and there is truth in it even though I object to the way it was written – needs to be understood, and broadly, among the population. The challenge is to communicate this history is a way that it can be understood, and in that, Professor Richardson excels. I count myself fortunate to have found her, and I believe it is incumbent on us to spread the word.
R Dooley. I’ve come to respect your thoughtful comments in this electronic community, so your response to the HuffPost article got my immediate and focused attention. I have read and re-read your perspective on the reporting and, though impressed as always with your reasoned approach to the story, I came away unconvinced by your argument.
As a just-turned-82-year-old African American, I see the report through a different lens, not only as a retired journalist, but of course as one who has been considered as “other” his whole life. The report, to my eyes, was not critical of the generalized shock, so much as it derided the reporters and commentators being stunned that it was happening HERE.
Very few people of color would have been similarly surprised.
For those of us who have not been classified as “white,” the threat of terror at the hands of those who are so designated has been a tragic reality of day-to-day life. I can see the heads nodding in recognition as the bulletins were published, on TV and on the Internet, and the voices murmuring knowingly, uh huh, uh huh. It’s old news in communities of color and on those terrible “reservations” where indigenous peoples are “corralled.”
But it is in the dominant communities where this is news. It is there that a careful ignorance is nurtured. “These things just don’t happen here”, is the watchword.
So the perspective of the article is that no American should be allowed to remain ignorant of this “real, true” history. And it is imperative that no journalist or educator should be kept from these facts, because they are tasked with informing/educating the rest of us.
The critical tone of this story is more than justified by the crying—and I use that word with intent—need for enlightenment regarding our history. Ignorance of our past dooms us to repeat its mistakes...and crimes.
Mr. Willis, thank you for your thoughtful comment.
I appreciate your perspective and wholeheartedly agree that the events of January 6th must be understood not as an aberration, but as yet another branch on the tree of pain nurtured by centuries of blood and tears.
My quarrel with this report is narrowly focused, and it is entirely likely that my attempt failed to convey that focus. It is not that the violence itself was shocking, it was the breaching of these particular spaces – the floors of the House and Senate – that I believe tested the journalists covering the story as it unfolded, to a degree that made it, I would argue, nearly impossible to provide the reflection the author demands of them. That criticism was, I believe, unfair.
That said, I concur in your belief in the “crying need for enlightenment regarding our history” and thank you sincerely for taking the time to consider my remarks.
My Libra tendencies lead me to agree with both of you even though I haven't read the article in question yet! Perhaps because of that, it almost feels as though Mr. Dooley and Mr. Willis are not talking about just precisely the same thread. I think there's a difference between shock and surprise. I've found myself shocked, but not surprised, by Wednesday's events, as well as hundreds of other things trump or his cronies have said or done in the last four+ years. The fact that it happens is shocking because I've not heard or seen it happen in that context before, but it's not really surprising based on the long or short term history related to the event. Having said that, it's also hard to find words to adequately describe my reactions to all this ; guess that's one reason I'm here, to try to find some words. Thanks to you all for being here too.
Point of fact, these insurrectionists have been storming state houses for quite some time...even before Tя☭mp was elected. The pro-gun rallies occurred every year on Capitol grounds in Virginia - I would have to walk through hordes of mostly white men holding their weapons as if ready to shoot. And they attacked state Capitol's for the last year or two. The attack on our nation's Capitol was disgusting, but not unpredictable.
Listen to Malcom Nance, former highly decorated Naval Intel officer/anti Terror soldier. I've read his stuff. The navy ships sit off shore monitoring communications. SM especially. Nance draws many parallels from ISIS recruitment and radicalization to what has happened to Americans by White Supremist Groups, Q, and DT.
In this recent interview he also explains what the Militia's in Michigan conspired to do to Gov Whitmer. Its horrible. This is like ISIS living among us in White Skin Camouflaged. There is no way leadership didn't see what was coming Jan 6th. NO WAY. Jan 6th was a well planned widely known plot at insurrection.
State Capitals do not have DC’s gun restrictions. Nor do they have the intelligence services and coordination of layers of security. They are softer targets, and now the radicals alphabet been emboldened. Capital taking is the new Columbine and Sandy Hook. Not good people.
Agreed! To think we are “above all this” is to believe we are a perfect union. We are not! We have and have had MUCH fixing to do. Are we going to do it this time or keep whining while being blind to who we are and the very corruption and indecency, racism and greed we’ve been sitting on forever? We’ve fallen far from the concept that we are “the greatest nation on earth” while people of color get shot in their own homes and there is no accountability, corporations run the country and the very earth we live on is raped and beaten, and white collar crime only goes to jail as a gesture to appease the masses.
In my opinion what happened at the capital is the scab being torn off the wound that’s been festering, letting us know that too many politicians who walk thru it’s halls are undeserving of such. It was begging to be payed attention to and will continue until we see this for what it is, an expose’ of lies.
I agree. And the reality is that our country was founded on the lie of “all ‘men’ are created equal.” That was never true here, never has been and still is not.
I think people have grown accustomed to an overlay of racism. It is horrific and tragic but it is a fact that many people do not understand how to begin to come out at an issue or a happening through the lenses of a person of color if they are not one themselves. If people who had raided the Capitol building had been people of color ..the bodies would’ve been scattered all over the steps...As joy Reid said she wondered what it would be like to be able to approach a building and not have someone be threatened by her simply by the color of her skin
Mr Willis, Thank you for speaking from your perspective as an African-American. For many years, I have made the effort to ask myself when I encounter my Black fellow citizens, how has this person's life been made more difficult every day simply by virtue of their skin color? Sure, my life has been affected by poverty, job insecurity, misogynism, but my skin color has let me off the hook when I walk into a Starbucks and sit down without ordering to wait for a friend, off the hook when I have a taillight out in my car or when I drive a few miles over the speed limit, off the hook when I speak up a little more loudly than colleagues at faculty meetings, or when I march in protest.
Many years ago, I was teaching a college prep reading and writing class for international students and taught a unit on violence in America against BIPOC being a thread that runs through our history since before the Revolution. My mostly Japanese and Korean students were shocked - not so much at the information in that week's readings and videos, but that I, a white American, was aware of this history and wanted to discuss it. They didn't see me as someone who hates my country, but as someone who wants my country to admit its tragic flaws and strive to live up to its promise.
If young people around the world are aware of the painful and inhumane parts of our nation's history and present, certainly we here ought to expect that knowledge to inform the actions and words of our journalists, educators, and officials. Indeed, that knowledge needs to inform the actions and words of all of us.
“A nationalist will say that “it can’t happen here,” which is the first step toward disaster. A patriot says that it could happen here, but that we will stop it.”
― Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century
Exactly. Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt. If we keep saying it can’t happen here, we are as blind as his delusional supporters only drinking different flavored koolaid.
I don't read HuffPo and won't now so I appreciate your input here. I've written elsewhere that along with my middle school | high school | undergraduate college courses in politics, history, government and civil responsibility (1970-1980), my greatest lessons on America came from working and living abroad during the 1990's. I learned so much from my travels, breaking bread with nationals from all over the world, and having neighbors from all kinds of places. The world knows and understands more about America than her very citizens. This is why I loved Obama's great efforts at traveling the world and opening international dialogue at least.
There is a difference between "live coverage" and "political commentary." Expecting insightful analysis as an event is unfolding is, as you suggest, unrealistic, but I don't think that is what the article is pointing to. There has been plenty of analysis since, after time for reflection and dot-connecting, that has nevertheless suggested exceptionality.
H. A Hellyer's quote within this writing is exactly the point why this country is not the superior country a lot of Americans like to feel it is. It is a lot easier for a person to look out and say look at them and not look at me and what I am doing. I am 56 and we were raised as children in school to believe us Americans are within the superior country. I remember being marched around the room singing patriotic songs. We lwere like brainwashed mini Americans. We must look within and realize we are Americans and yes other countries do watch us to see if we are growing strong as a country. The actions of these folks who appear to be brainwashed by Trumpism are showing other countries that we are not the superior country we all want to feel we are. This is dangerous for our country and our standings with the world.
Thank you Bill for this extremely cogent article. I'm not new to the concepts expressed but I am comforted by being able to see coherent and informed thought in action. That also brings me to the thought that somewhere underlying that mobs actions there may be similarly coherent thought processes occurring for which the mob served as a blunt instrument. Fortunately, at this point, that thought process has not gotten its hands on a scalpel or the skill to wield it. That doesn't mean it never will.
Get some rest, Heather. If I'm exhausted, with no particular responsibilities, I know you're way beyond spent. Thanks so much for your invaluable, unfailing efforts for all of us and our democracy. We should nominate you for the Medal of Freedom.
The idea that Trump's terrorists succeeded in attacking and damaging the U.S Capital when Bin Laden's failed is a reality I find difficult to get out of mind. I would so like to hear reaction from the widows and widowers of the heroes on Flight 93 who died to protect the Capital on 9/11. Surely they are in shock and dismay at the tarnishing of their spouse's memories by such a foul group of human slime.
Still waiting to hear what the complaint was about yesterday’s letter. So sorry you have to put up with this kind of nonsense. Your work is invaluable. Don’t stop and don’t let idiots get you down.
HCR mentioned that she has been getting a lot of hate mail these days. My hope is that this calms down and she stays safe. It seems that we have been collectively able to keep the worst of the trolls and Deplorables off this feed, but her public presence is a goad to them--especially because she is female. In my experience that absolutely sends them 'round the bend even more.
Confronting pollical corruption, racism, injustice, and inequality is always going to have serious hard core haters. Log their mail, and send the list to the FBI office. These are serious assholes and need to be on the domestic terror watch list. Its unreasonable to think that those that are radicalized are ever going to stop if not confronted. Share with other journalist and writers who are exploring the same. Social justice needs to be collaborative effort between journalist, academia, law enforcement and citizens.
My January 8, 2021 post has been taken down. Usually this happens when someone complains about it. The post then goes to Facebook jail until a moderator reviews it. At that point, until now, anyway, it has always come back up. I expect the same will happen this time, eventually.
I also expect that this will happen frequently for awhile, as far-right activists try to reclaim the public platforms that have now been denied them. Their panic at being kicked off Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and so on illustrates exactly what I've been trying to say about the importance of reclaiming public debate. If they didn't think taking up oxygen was important, they would not be fighting so hard to make sure they dominate public spaces.
Do remember, though, that my posts are always available-- for free-- at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com under the title "Letters from an American." You don't have to subscribe or get them through email if you don't want to; you can just go to the site and read them there. If you DO want to get them through email, you can sign up through the free option. You don't have to worry that I will use advertising or harvest emails (who am I kidding? I don't even know how! :) )
These are frightening times, and we're all tired and on edge-- me, included. It means a lot to have so many people here who care.
Thank you for sharing this - I was also unaware and am glad to know. Like others, I have also not been on Facebook much for a while now, having almost eliminated all social media and significantly reducing my news consumption in an effort to preserve sanity in these highly stressful times.
I go to that site to read and save her letters to my computer. Have been saving them daily since Sept 10th. That way I have just the letters themselves, rather that all the other stuff on the FB page it crops up in.
I had no idea, Kari...thank you for posting this. I go on FB sporadically these days, mostly only for Dr. R's chats. Been too busy here on substack! Thanks, again.
How does this work? How do you report someone for real abuse? If Heather can get blocked for truth, but I see all kinds of real abuse/hate ? that never gets delt/deleted
You should publish the complaints that Facebook asserts against your post. I have yet to see one that cites any valid violation of their standards, by liberals, whether it has been restored or not.
1. Biden proved he is presidential and not an addled old man prone to gaffs, much less a socialist.
2. Georgia assured a change in Senate control
3. The Republican Party is finally at it's turning/breaking point as to whether or not it has a future.
4. The appointment of Merrick Garland will prove to be a checkmate move. Even though we on the left are not enthralled with the man, he will be Kryptonite to the GOP's accusations of liberal commies are coming to get them.
Finally, it really doesn't matter all that much if there is a 25th Amendment or Impeachment remedy for T****. He will ultimately go down the way of Al Capone being convicted not for his most heinous crimes, but for something like tax evasion or corruption in a court where no pardon can protect him. We may not get the punishment we want but his crimes will be punished.
Meanwhile as we gird ourselves for the next attack being advertised already on the Capitol on the 17th, remember all the good things above knowing more are on the way and this time D.C. will be prepared to render a proper defense.
One of the Sunday morning shows had a piece on Andy Kim (D-NJ), who passed through the Rotunda after the Electoral vote confirmation had finished, saw the maintenance staff and others cleaning up the trash, and joined in the effort for several hours (in suit and tie). That was a positive thing to witness, and Kim has become an example of an elected official who has not set himself above the fray, but continues to see himself as one of the people.
I had no idea who Andy Kim was, but when I saw that picture I was moved by the fact some guy in a suit and tie was helping with the cleanup.
And then, soon enough, some guy promptly claimed it was a staged photo-op. That saddened me. I don't know if it was or it was not, but I prefer to believe it was not; that (most) politicians are inherently Good People.
But perhaps that sentiment betrays my age, and that perhaps that perspective is now quaint and old fashioned.
When I came to this country as a young Grad Student, Reagan was President and finishing his final term. He had already forged a warm friendship with Tip O'Neill. Both of them were (by the standards of the time) fairly partisan. Yet, they formed a warm friendship and had figured out how to check their politics at the door and become friends "after 6pm".
I recall the enormous pride I felt at coming to a country with political leaders of integrity. (I had moved from India, where the assumption is that politicians are corrupt opportunist crooks). Part of that pride came from having watched a crooked President Nixon being hounded out - that ironically Nixonian message that "people have got to know whether or not their President is a crook".
I don't know if I'll ever see that sort of politics again during my lifetime. I don't know if I will ever see that country again during my lifetime.
Hope is also faith in spite of fear. Faith (however manifested) that there will be a release from fear. That there means to overcome that of which one is afraid.
Always so very important to look for the good in times of distress. Your list is great. Thank you! I’m a believer in silver linings, hope, better angels, quiet miracles. The loud and raucous distractions, drama and trauma, will always be there if you want a helping or two. Or more as some seem to want and need. Staying in it makes one sick, though, just liking eating to much unhealthy food.
It takes focus, calm, and effort to do what you’ve demonstrated here. Thank you again for the reminder to watch the mental diet.
These aren't pipe dreams or pie-in-the-sky things, it's reality. It's what you chose to focus on that matters. I'm not saying ignore the bad news, I'm saying don't ignore the good.
Exactly. This is the essence of mindfulness. Centering oneself. Being completely aware of reality yet choosing efforts that serve you well and contribute to the greater good. Grass root movements. Stay out of the noise.
Agree, but disagree on Donald Duck Rebellion. Must be held accountable. Must resign or Impeach / Remove. Without accountability, we are doomed to repeat.
If only they could. The House can vote to impeach but it will never get past the Senate. He can't resign, it will kill him to resign. Accountability will either be judicial or social/moral. If the House votes to impeach T**** will be double scarred for life and it will eat him to his dying breath that he didn't have a real presidency.
He will be punished but it will be in a court where he is beyond pardon, you know that's in the states. Just like Al Capone, he will go down on some tax related crime. I don't give a whit what nails him, I only care he's found guilty of something.....finally.
Screw him, he's a frail human being like the rest of us. What goes around has come around to finish him off.
Both banks dumped DT. Deutsche bank and Signiture bank. And dumped Ivanka from their board. How the f was Ivanka on a banks board that loaned to her dads biz? Freaking total corruption, we never learn.
Yes, mostly agree, but we need to break the delusion in most or some of his supporters. Republicans need to hold him accountable and force him to tell the truth. Or he continues to call on his supports to commit violence as that is his only leverage. Why else would we be here. This call is already out there and they are plotting now attacks at all 50 Capitols.
Without accountability, and the defenses at all Capitols hardened up, this is what his supporters are weighing their sick minds, "Where is it easiest to strike?" A soft or hard target? Without a way to communicate on SM, to amass large numbers in one place, like Jan 6th, his cells of supporters will act on their own. His supporters will strike violently at the homes of elected officials independently. This is how it went sideways in so many countries before with demagogues and dictators, in Algeria, Lebanon, Chile, Eastern Europe, Cambodia, Colombia, Russia, Central America. I want to be wrong, I hope I am wrong, but I've come to expect the worst from DT and he has always delivered.
I really enjoyed Garland nomination acceptance speech. I feel he is different. There was something different as he spoke with more gravitas, perhaps recognizing the historic nature of this moment. HE IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTING DT! First time in history for a former president and family and Rudy.
Thanks for posting the Snyder OpEd. I passed by it earlier, but I am happy you posted it and I read it. I appreciate his analysis that there are "gamers" and "breakers" and that, among other consequences, the "gamers" will now use this event to feign sincerity to further game their power. And his paraphrasing of Hannah Arendt: "Arendt thought big lies work only in lonely minds; their coherence substitutes for experience and companionship."
Snyder’s essay is so important. We need to shift from calling it the Republican “narrative” to calling it for what it is, the big lie, and recognizing that it is not just trump, but the Republican strategy of the past 30 years. Please see my separate post about Snyder’s essay.
Not sure how one can talk about the dome of the Capitol without mentioning that it is topped by The Statue of Freedom. A statue built by slaves.
"While Freedom was being cast at Mills' foundry, the foreman in charge of the casting went on strike. Instead of paying him the higher wages he demanded, Mills turned the project over to Philip Reid, one of the slaves working at the facility. Reid presided over the rest of the casting and assembly of the figure.[11] Late in 1863, construction of the dome was sufficiently advanced for the installation of the statue, which was hoisted by former slaves in sections and assembled atop the cast-iron pedestal. The final section, the figure's head and shoulders, was raised on December 2, 1863, to a salute of 35 guns answered by the guns of the 12 forts around Washington, D.C."- from Wikipedia
Declaration of Independence is one of four large panels in the Capital Rotunda painted by John Trumbull around 1820. Trumbull was just 19 years old when he joined the Army at the start of the Revolutionary War. He was at the Battle of Bunker Hill, though not a participant; that experience formed the basis for much of his most famous artwork. After the war, he travelled far and wide to capture the likenesses of the men who signed the Declaration so he could get their images right when he created the first version of this painting in the 1780s.
The other three Trumbull panels represent key moments in the making of America: Burgoyne's Surrender at Saratoga, Cornwallis's Surrender at Yorktown, and General George Washington Resigning His Commission to Congress. This latter subject may seem a dramaless choice, but Trumbull understood its significance.
He had been in London studying art with Benjamin West when this occurred. He had witnessed firsthand the awe and disbelief Washington's resignation had caused. Europeans could not imagine someone with the power that Washington wielded freely transferring it to the civilian authorities. Trumbull, more than most Americans, understood the significance of Washington’s gesture, and he intended to immortalize that moment.
This is just some more of the heritage that was desecrated by Trump's terrorists last week.
I'm sorry to have mislead you. As far as I know, there was no damage done to these paintings. I was just referring to the fact that the defiling of the Capital also defiled its contents in a figurative way.
It should be remembered that the architectural concept of the Capitol building and its dome served as a model for many State Capitol buildings throughout the country. Constructtion of the Washington Capitol began in 1793. Symbolically, it represents representative democracy both to Americans and those striving for freedom around the world. Creating Capitol buildings in the different States inspired by this concept brought representative democarcy to every corner of the United States in practical and not just legal, constitutional terms; it brought the people together to decide collectively what their future would look like.
In each we now find many Trumpian opportunists and fanatics. The fight to ensure that "government of the people, by the people for the people" survives starts in everyone's backyard; in the politics of your local district and your State elections. Clean out these Augean Stables and the results will be clearly visible in Washington.
Thank you, Stuart (and others in this thread)for these insights! I'm an interior design student, and part of our program includes studying history of architecture (albeit in a truncated fashion). When Trump signed his Executive Order on Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture, I was absolutely appalled.
Architecture is one way of us communicating across the ages and to the generations that follow. It is no surprise that this administration would go so far as tell us to forget this period of time and reject the ideas of Modernism (and the tenets with which it is coded).
Modern architecture was born toward social good and improving the lives for all. It is agnostic of one's skin color or heritage, gender identity, religion, sexual orientation. Thus, modernism celebrates diversity. It filters out the unnecessary and superfluous to bring humans into focus. Modernism responds to the universal aspirations of utility, beauty, truth, and joy.
Given the proclivities of this administration, it is no surprise that they would go so far as to write hate into the architecture of federal buildings.
e
PS- Hawaii's State Capitol is my favorite. An example of how modernism can still draw on precedents and symbolism of the past with a hopeful look to the future. Siting, reference to place, materiality, etc.
PSS - It was noted that Melania Trump has an "architecture" degree. Albeit one from a non-existent university is Slovenia. 😂
So, on Dec 18th, 45 took time from tweeting and golf to sign an executive order that includes a definition of Deconstructivist style. This may be a clue that he didn't write it all himself. Eric, I agree with you: the POTUS should have no direct role in choosing public building designs. Now I have to go look to find what other pet projects have landed on his desk after he lost the election.
[EDITED] @Jay Greenwood - Oh, anytime I see multisyllabic words I just assume it's someone else writing for him! 😂
While I think community engagement is important when it comes to things like civic buildings, I'm not privy to *this* President having a say in it.
But as Heather has pointed out time and time again, history repeats itself and we only need to look to Adolf Hitler and his architect, Albert Speer to see how this overlays with fascism and this current administration's role in that.
Great photos on this link, thank you, Stuart. So it seems I must be corrected. I heard/read somewhere years ago that the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C. was the only entity "entitled" to use the spelling C-a-p-i-t-o-l; Everything else should be spelled
The buildings are called Capitol because they are supposed to represent Rome's Capitoline Hill, which was the seat of the Republic. The cities themselves--as well as Washington DC--are called "capitals" as in the top of a structure (the capital of a column is the fancy bit at the top)
That i didn't know, Lynell. I thought that it was perhaps a linguistic peculiarity of American English. On checking i find that Capitol is defined as the building in which the legistative branch of a government meets. So not exclusive to DC.
I think in the coming days we'll be looking very closely for head-lice eggs (nits) in our orange-haired overgrown child and his school 6 (or more) playmates from from the other side of town....both brown and white! Treatment required!
As Heather rests, some food for thought from Timothy Snyder:
“Post-truth is pre-fascism, and Trump has been our post-truth president. When we give up on truth, we concede power to those with the wealth and charisma to create spectacle in its place. Without agreement about some basic facts, citizens cannot form the civil society that would allow them to defend themselves.”
Snyder continues to discuss our problem of trump’s big lie that he won the election and how it functions in the political power dynamics.
I appreciate that Snyder calls it for what it is—the big lie—and how the masses of followers buy into it. Framing the problem as the Republican “narrative” is a more cerebral concept, more difficult to grasp its critical significance. And framing it as a matter of trump’s personality greatly narrows our examination of the scope of the problem.
Trump’s big lie and his seditious enablers do lie in the context of the Republican strategy of the past 30 years to promote propaganda over facts, like the Karl Rove quote about creating reality, and while liberals are studying it, the Republicans are creating new reality. The big lie is not just trump’s. The big lie has been the Republican strategy for the past 30 years, since Newt Gingrich:
“ In 1990, after consulting focus groups[48] with the help of pollster Frank Luntz,[49] GOPAC distributed a memo with a cover letter signed by Gingrich titled "Language, a Key Mechanism of Control", that encouraged Republicans to "speak like Newt". It contained lists of "contrasting words"—words with negative connotations such as "radical", "sick," and "traitors"—and "optimistic positive governing words" such as "opportunity", "courage", and "principled", that Gingrich recommended for use in describing Democrats and Republicans, respectively.[48]”
“ According to Harvard University political scientists Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky, Gingrich's speakership had a profound and lasting impact on American politics and health of American democracy. They argue that Gingrich instilled a "combative" approach in the Republican Party, where hateful language and hyper-partisanship became commonplace, and where democratic norms were abandoned. Gingrich frequently questioned the patriotism of Democrats, called them corrupt, compared them to fascists, and accused them of wanting to destroy the United States. Gingrich furthermore oversaw several major government shutdowns.[65][66][67][59]
University of Maryland political scientist Lilliana Mason uses Gingrich's instructions to Republicans to use words such as “betray, bizarre, decay, destroy, devour, greed, lie, pathetic, radical, selfish, shame, sick, steal, and traitors” about Democrats as an example of a breach in social norms and exacerbation of partisan prejudice.[7]”
Fact checking myself, I found some interesting facts about Newt Gingrich. He has a Ph.D. in European history and would know the history of fascism as well as Snyder, but used his knowledge to become a deceptive manipulator in pursuit of power, instead of a truth-teller like Snyder and HCR. Gingrich was a history professor prior to entering politics. So as we have become fans of history professors, we see they are not all equal!
Exemption from ethics and outright playing dirty for gain of power has also been the Republican way of the past 30 years:
“ In May 1988, Gingrich (along with 77 other House members and Common Cause) brought ethics charges against Democratic Speaker Jim Wright, who was alleged to have used a book deal to circumvent campaign-finance laws and House ethics rules. During the investigation, it was reported that Gingrich had his own unusual book deal, for Window of Opportunity, in which publicity expenses were covered by a limited partnership. It raised $105,000 from Republican political supporters to promote sales of Gingrich's book.[42] Gingrich's success in forcing Wright's resignation contributed to his rising influence in the Republican caucus.[43]”
Gingrich married his high school math teacher, then among other things, “revelations of an extramarital affair with a congressional employee 23 years his junior resulted in Gingrich's resignation from the speakership on November 6, 1998.[4][5]
When my dad told me about this he said that, early in the Civil War, from the roof of the Capital dome, the carpenters could see the Confederate army on the far side of the Potomac. Even so, President Lincoln insisted that they continue building the Capital’s dome. I thought of this on January 6, even after a riot and loss of life, the senators and congress people returned to the task of certifying the results of the election.
Yet another friend called me tonight - this one from Mississippi - and thanked me for sharing your letters with her. She said it calmed her down. That's four friends in the past week - also women in Missouri, Illinois and Pennsylvania - all said the same - you are an anchor in a storm. Thank you for your work.
Anchor in a storm, so perfect.
Also a sailor: anchor in a storm works. Why? When we seek safe harbor from a storm the harbor is but a step in weathering the storm. The anchor, also known as ground tackle, is crucial in holding one’s place during the storm. The anchor, if of adequate size and is well set, will keep your vessel from crashing into other vessels or the shore and other obstacles.
We in this space, created by Heather, are in the safe harbor mode, weathering the storm. Heather creates the anchor we need to stay focused on what the storm is bringing and is providing us with the tools to fight and hold our ground for our democracy. For this I am thankful.
Bow into the wind and rain we will persevere.
Another good suggestion I heard at a wonderful retreat this weekend: "When the storm comes, the thing to do is get low in the boat." A stable base is what's called for especially in times of trouble.
I'm hearing from friends too, thanking me for sharing her posts.
That's how i came on board too.
Shared the "Letters" with siblings who are not big Facebook people
:) i wonder if the expression isn’t harbor in a storm (??)
From a sailor: a port in a storm is the idiom you’re searching for :)))
Any port
Heather: I’ve brought this up before as a “chat on politics “ question to you before the attempted coup on the Capitol. It probably came across as an extreme notion then, but in light of what’s come to pass— which most never thought would happen in the USA— I think it’s worth serious consideration now.
The unfolding of events in DC is unpredictable yet worrisome. As a safety net emergency measure for extraordinary times, I think it would be prudent for Biden/Harris to take the oath of office now that they are president elect and VP elect. The oath can be taken any time in that it is not written in the Constitution that it be done January 20 at noon when Trump’s presidency and power ends and Biden/Harris’ begins. There is precedent for this though not for these unprecedented circumstances. It is taken privately with a Bible, with a judge administering it plus a witness.
Nobody can predict what will be happening at noon January 20 when power shifts and the transition is complete except for the oath-taking. If chaos reigns, Biden/Harris will already have taken the oath and are in power. He can do whatever is necessary as President. The inauguration ceremony might have to be postponed. Who knows. Whenever it takes place, Biden/Harris can publicly take the oath of office again. The early taking of the oath is strictly a safety net for he is still powerless till noon January 20. No?
Super interesting possibility... wonder if it’s being considered?
I don't know, Monet...this comment was meant to test the waters as to the notion's zaniness or merit. So far, the response has been mostly positive. I know who to ask as to who to contact. Thanks for sharing your reaction.
Yes to this, Martha!!! I fear "Inauguration" as usual will be a terrible disaster. Yes, to all you have stated.
Thanks, Carla. I'm going to find out from a Dem official who would know who I should direct it to in DC. It's probably already been suggested and considered, but you never know.
I am also worried about the usual inauguration celebration. I'd be all for just having it in somebody's office, televised. No crowd!!
I'm told security is pressuring Biden for inside and televised.
That is good to hear. I hope he heeds it. Seriously. This is no time to underestimate possibilities.
This happened in TN in the late 70s. The governor-elect, Lamar Alexander, was sworn in early bc the outgoing governor, Ray Blanton, was, among other crimes, selling pardons from the governor’s mansion.
I enjoy the concept but I think it would be empty symbolism until Trump’s power ceases.
We already can anticipate a more legal form of Governance from the President Elect Biden but his predecessor can wrack havoc until noon January 20, 2021 and I think we should focus on curbing that wreckage.
I agree that it's an interesting concept, Hap. Your response suggests this approach has shades of being less than legal. I truly don't intend it to be. Some constitutional expert has determined that it's legal for there are several precedents on record for early oath-taking as private (this doesn't mean secret) and later public, so indications are it's above board. I don't see symbolism entering the picture till noon, January 20, cuz Bidenhas no power till Trump relinquishes it. Noon, January 20, and not one fraction of a second later. No one can predict what will be happening then. Unforeseeable. Whatever the situation might be--worst case scenario, possibly chaotic--having a sworn-in president would be covered. Then it's just the ticking of the clock past noon that changes everything. No?
As to havoc and wreckage, I'm crossing my fingers that impeachment will neutralize Trump. That's the focus.Then there's January 17 to consider....
Good idea, Martha. Although circumstances are vastly different, your suggestion brought to my mind the iconic image of LyndonJohnson being sworn in as president on the airplane with Jackie Kennedy, in her blood-soaked pink suit, and others surrounding him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#/media/File:Lyndon_B._Johnson_taking_the_oath_of_office,_November_1963.jpg
I wondered if they could take the oath privately earlier in the day on the 20th and then have a "redo" for the public once it's safer for all....i.e the thugs have been reined in and the pandemic is less a threat.
EVEM A PRIVATE 7 A.M. INAUGURATION WOULD MAKE SENSE.
Two Presidents at the same time, even for just a week or so? Not a good idea. The Roman Catholic Church had such an experience with multiple Popes toward the end of the Fourteenth centry and it didn't work very well.
As I recall the whole 14th century didn't work real well for Catholicism.
I don't think so, Jacob. Biden would be powerless till noon. Conflict not possible. It's just something that occurred to me that might have merit in uncertain times.
Those popes vs antipope. Fighting over the spiritual kingdom of heaven.Power plays.
Not a bad idea. It has been done before in TN but that state's Constitution didn't mandate a specific day at that time. Lamar Alexander had been elected but the previous governor had been selling Clemencies for cash and the state gov't wanted to stop that and swore him in early. The U.S. Constitution does by Amendment 20: "AMENDMENT XX
Passed by Congress March 2, 1932. Ratified January 23, 1933. Section 1.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin. "
Note: Article I, section 4, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of this amendment. In addition, a portion of the 12th amendment was superseded by section 3.
Section 1.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
I've been writing my senators (Ds) requesting they initiate at least a censure of the six slimes lead by Hawley and Cruz and not allow the Senate to go back to business as usual after these roaches crawled out from under their rusted bean cans to de-legitimize the voices of tens of thousands of Arizona and Pennsylvania folks who cast legal votes which were counted legally. I'm so disgusted with Cruz calling out Biden for not healing the country Cruz has been hacking apart for years with lies and sneers. Trump is a terrible reminder of all that is not honorable and positive in our country, but Cruz and his like are even more despicable for wanting to lick up Trump's crumbs and profit from Trump's false cult. Enough, sorry...
I've come to realize Congressman, like the Potus, can be fooled by their FB feeds. Choosing what has more likes & shares, than what real people are saying. Do they not understand what BOT amplification is and how it works? Or are they in on that too? They seem to miss that they take an oath to serve all the people, not just the irrational and loud.
"Too often we honor swagger and bluster and the wielders of force" -RFK 1968
Either way, the people may need to devise new strategies of being heard, new ways connecting and building justice into something new, that can overwhelm the metrics that political leaders look to measure before they act. I think this space is one of those where these new strategies will be born.
Thank you, Ted. The "silent majority" must find a way to be heard.
Could it be as easy as infiltrating the social sites that spew the lies and continue an onslaught of truth? If we all do it, can we figuratively scream them down?
Have to do something. I hate serious mg them emboldened, unchecked, unconfrimted.
This is really insightful and thought-provoking for me, Ted. Thank you. You are posing a strategy area that is positive, possible and very apt for 2021.
Problems beget problems. Possibilities create opportunities.
I quit Twitter yesterday. It wasn't that useful to me anyway. I would like to quit Facebook, but I don't want to miss HCR's twice-weekly chats. But if she moved them elsewhere, I could well do without Facebook.
My twitter accounts are currently under suspension due to calling for trump to face criminal prosecution and face the death penalty for treason.
I refuse to retract.
I quit FB this past year for good and actually deleted everything. I’m so happy I did because I will not support its business practices for one minute. I have found that HCRs YouTube works fine for me. It may not be in ‘real time’ like FB, but I don’t even think about that.
That's a good point. I wish her chats would post to YouTube sooner, though. The latest I have there just now is Jan 5. I can't yet do without more timely doses!
Oh that’s way behind. I can see your point!
We need to take back public discourse, that includes SM
Absolutely! This is a critical topic.. I went on Twitter in the first place in order to discover good news sources. Honestly, I just got more confused. I got some good pointers form you, Ted and also from others, and I think I now have a good range of sources. I pay for some of these, and I'm willing to, but many other people would not be willing, and good news sources should be freely and easily available to everyone. I used to read the papers at the public library (where I worked for years.) With social media and especially now with Covid, the library is less helpful or available. I"m also older, and I live in a very small community with limited library services. We don't have a television, but I have my laptop, and my husband has his iPad. He's a Brit, and he likes the Guardian. He seems to get news more quickly than I do!
You might like and may I suggest, "Messing with the Enemy" Clint Watts
Thanks. I'll check it out.
The Fascist Leader State
1.Lie, Lie all the time, 24/7.... about everything and everyone
2. When accused of lying attack & accuse them for lying.
3. When everyone is confused and doesn't know the truth anymore, enough people submit to the mystic of the dear leader completes the process and democracy is killed.
Every wonder why there are so many conspiracy theories? That's to confuse and throw you off the trail as the fascist commit real Conspiracy Plots to overthrow democracy. Flood the the zone with so much mis information, create fatigue and doubt in every person, every institution, and every process. Then capitalize when the timing is right.
Imagine if 911 happed 9 11 2020..... during DT presidency this year.
The Anatomy of Fascism, Robert O. Paxton
The Road to Unfreedom, Tim Snyder
How Fascism Works, Jason Stanley
Fascism-A Warning, Madeleine Albright
I have read the Madeleine Albright book.
Hey, Becky. I joined Twitter a few years ago so I could interact with the show Survivor. Never understood how it worked, and still don't! Would you kindly tell me how to quit? Like you, I'm keeping FB because of Dr. R's chats.
Hi Lynell. Well, I can't exactly remember, and I can't go there now to find out, but it was not "quit" or "unsubscribe" but something that sounded less final, and I can't think of the word that was used. It gave me the feeling that all my tweets would consider to exist somewhere, but I didn't see any other option. Probably I should research this. Maybe when I get a burst of energy. I feel so drained right now!
No worries, Becky. Thank you for replying!
It was deactivated.
Richard, censoring 45 and every one of the congress people who stood with him to contest our fair election is a fast way to shut them up for awhile. I think the impeachment and/or 25th are doomed and will overshadow the start of Biden's term. Anything B might do that is positive will be lost in the mayhem of doing 'something' to 45. As disgusted as I am by what is happening now and HAS BEEN happening for years, I would be okay with censur and then pop the popcorn to see what SDNY et al do on 1/20/21 at 12:01 (interesting number sequence, eh? Any numerologists out there?)
Also, I don't want an inauguration on the steps of the Capitol. Do it in a studio and let us all watch them, safely out of any assassins sites.
Every time I start thinking about the inauguration and safety I become uncomfortable. I will do my best to hold a positive vision for that day wherever it is held. Like many of us, we are shaken and concerned. As for trump and his followers, they must be held accountable ASAP!
We cannot let fear and insecurity prevent us from doing what is the legal and morally proper thing to do. And no Republican would, most assuredly. They do not let such things stop them from doing the illegal and immoral.
The 25th Amendment should be invoked, and Trump must be impeached. It is the course of integrity, and it is the legal and moral course to take.
The Cruz criticism of Biden is an act indicative of an abuser.
We are all supremely fortunate to have found Dr. Richardson’s monumental contribution to our one day even greater nation. That possibility still exists, in part, due to her work dissecting the events of these past 15 or so months. Thank you, Professor.
To all my co-grape pickers in Heather’s vineyard, I feel a deep obligation to share this rather blunt article, assessing the response to Wednesday’s insurrection. It carries an eye-opening message that this virtual community, especially, needs to heed and remember.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/political-violence-all-american-history_n_5ff73da1c5b6214c551878e6
With respect, I take issue with the thrust of the article – not with many of the underlying points it makes, but with the method it employs.
Following a summary of the events of Wednesday afternoon, the author writes, “Politicians, pundits and cable news journalists expressed bewilderment at how this could be happening in the United States.”
IMO, the crux of the article is represented in these observations:
“Zaheer Ali, an oral historian and adjunct instructor at New York University, said that Americans’ collective inability to reckon with their own history has led to such problematic cherry-picking about what the United States represents.
“I was more frustrated by the news commentary that sought to frame this as so unusual, unpredictable, unexpected, un-American, etc. This exceptionalism that says ‘this doesn’t happen here’ or ‘this is not who we are’ ignores the history of America,” Ali said.
“Subscribing to the false narrative of American exceptionalism has led us to be blind to this part of our legacy as a country,” he added. This fallacy has led some journalists and other observers to look outside the U.S. for reference points in order to understand the current political situation instead of reflecting internally.
That the United States has a troubled history of racism and political violence, is undeniable, except by those who deny it. But I take exception to the broad characterizations this article presents, which appear to be grounded in political grievance and commercial expediency.
The world was shocked by the events of January 6th – is it so surprising that reporters covering the unfolding events expressed dismay at what was taking place? Never in America’s history had citizens stormed the Capitol. This was an unprecedented event. Nitpicking at the live coverage of that day for failing to adequately reflect on the historical antecedents to these events, is grossly unfair – holding journalists to unrealistic standards.
Expecting people caught in a moment of profound drama to reflect, is a tall order. The writer then leaps from the contemporaneous reactions of journalists and others to the unfolding events, to a broad indictment that their language is evidence of their blindness to the violence that has been a recurring element of America’s political narrative. The article may be a clever exercise in political rhetoric, but it comes across to this reader as a cheap shot.
One need only scan the world’s newspapers of that day and the following morning, to see that political leaders of all stripes were shocked by what had happened.
The following statement was made by Hassan Rouhani:
In a televised speech Thursday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said events at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday are evidence Western democracy is fragile and vulnerable to populism. He said, “A populist has arrived, and he has led his country to disaster over these past four years."
Rohani added he hoped “the next occupants of the White House” will “restore the country to a position worthy of the American nation, because the American nation is a great nation."
(Source: https://www.voanews.com/usa/world-leaders-offer-mixed-reactions-after-mayhem-us-capitol)
Many here have long been concerned, if not convinced, that something like the riot of January 6th was inevitable. Many believe we have not seen the worst of it. But that does not preclude our being deeply shocked as the events unfolded before our eyes, nor does our shock imply that we are unaware of the history of violence and racism in the country and its politics.
One of the reasons we are gathered in this forum, is that we want to understand how we got to where we are today. And the truth is the article - and there is truth in it even though I object to the way it was written – needs to be understood, and broadly, among the population. The challenge is to communicate this history is a way that it can be understood, and in that, Professor Richardson excels. I count myself fortunate to have found her, and I believe it is incumbent on us to spread the word.
R Dooley. I’ve come to respect your thoughtful comments in this electronic community, so your response to the HuffPost article got my immediate and focused attention. I have read and re-read your perspective on the reporting and, though impressed as always with your reasoned approach to the story, I came away unconvinced by your argument.
As a just-turned-82-year-old African American, I see the report through a different lens, not only as a retired journalist, but of course as one who has been considered as “other” his whole life. The report, to my eyes, was not critical of the generalized shock, so much as it derided the reporters and commentators being stunned that it was happening HERE.
Very few people of color would have been similarly surprised.
For those of us who have not been classified as “white,” the threat of terror at the hands of those who are so designated has been a tragic reality of day-to-day life. I can see the heads nodding in recognition as the bulletins were published, on TV and on the Internet, and the voices murmuring knowingly, uh huh, uh huh. It’s old news in communities of color and on those terrible “reservations” where indigenous peoples are “corralled.”
But it is in the dominant communities where this is news. It is there that a careful ignorance is nurtured. “These things just don’t happen here”, is the watchword.
So the perspective of the article is that no American should be allowed to remain ignorant of this “real, true” history. And it is imperative that no journalist or educator should be kept from these facts, because they are tasked with informing/educating the rest of us.
The critical tone of this story is more than justified by the crying—and I use that word with intent—need for enlightenment regarding our history. Ignorance of our past dooms us to repeat its mistakes...and crimes.
Mr. Willis, thank you for your thoughtful comment.
I appreciate your perspective and wholeheartedly agree that the events of January 6th must be understood not as an aberration, but as yet another branch on the tree of pain nurtured by centuries of blood and tears.
My quarrel with this report is narrowly focused, and it is entirely likely that my attempt failed to convey that focus. It is not that the violence itself was shocking, it was the breaching of these particular spaces – the floors of the House and Senate – that I believe tested the journalists covering the story as it unfolded, to a degree that made it, I would argue, nearly impossible to provide the reflection the author demands of them. That criticism was, I believe, unfair.
That said, I concur in your belief in the “crying need for enlightenment regarding our history” and thank you sincerely for taking the time to consider my remarks.
My Libra tendencies lead me to agree with both of you even though I haven't read the article in question yet! Perhaps because of that, it almost feels as though Mr. Dooley and Mr. Willis are not talking about just precisely the same thread. I think there's a difference between shock and surprise. I've found myself shocked, but not surprised, by Wednesday's events, as well as hundreds of other things trump or his cronies have said or done in the last four+ years. The fact that it happens is shocking because I've not heard or seen it happen in that context before, but it's not really surprising based on the long or short term history related to the event. Having said that, it's also hard to find words to adequately describe my reactions to all this ; guess that's one reason I'm here, to try to find some words. Thanks to you all for being here too.
I found myself ANGRY. This should NOT be happening in 2021.....not surprised, but I am angry.
Point of fact, these insurrectionists have been storming state houses for quite some time...even before Tя☭mp was elected. The pro-gun rallies occurred every year on Capitol grounds in Virginia - I would have to walk through hordes of mostly white men holding their weapons as if ready to shoot. And they attacked state Capitol's for the last year or two. The attack on our nation's Capitol was disgusting, but not unpredictable.
Simply adding to your post, the men with guns in the Michigan statehouse and threatening Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Listen to Malcom Nance, former highly decorated Naval Intel officer/anti Terror soldier. I've read his stuff. The navy ships sit off shore monitoring communications. SM especially. Nance draws many parallels from ISIS recruitment and radicalization to what has happened to Americans by White Supremist Groups, Q, and DT.
In this recent interview he also explains what the Militia's in Michigan conspired to do to Gov Whitmer. Its horrible. This is like ISIS living among us in White Skin Camouflaged. There is no way leadership didn't see what was coming Jan 6th. NO WAY. Jan 6th was a well planned widely known plot at insurrection.
https://www.msnbc.com/american-voices/watch/malcolm-nance-trump-insurgency-is-self-radicalizing-just-like-isis-99214405805
Where our legislators voted to allow open carry in our Capitol. HUH?
State Capitals do not have DC’s gun restrictions. Nor do they have the intelligence services and coordination of layers of security. They are softer targets, and now the radicals alphabet been emboldened. Capital taking is the new Columbine and Sandy Hook. Not good people.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/25/ammon-bundy-idaho/
But who needs guns when you have Covid.
Guns + Covid is a force multiplier for the Neo-Fascist
Agreed! To think we are “above all this” is to believe we are a perfect union. We are not! We have and have had MUCH fixing to do. Are we going to do it this time or keep whining while being blind to who we are and the very corruption and indecency, racism and greed we’ve been sitting on forever? We’ve fallen far from the concept that we are “the greatest nation on earth” while people of color get shot in their own homes and there is no accountability, corporations run the country and the very earth we live on is raped and beaten, and white collar crime only goes to jail as a gesture to appease the masses.
In my opinion what happened at the capital is the scab being torn off the wound that’s been festering, letting us know that too many politicians who walk thru it’s halls are undeserving of such. It was begging to be payed attention to and will continue until we see this for what it is, an expose’ of lies.
I agree. And the reality is that our country was founded on the lie of “all ‘men’ are created equal.” That was never true here, never has been and still is not.
I think people have grown accustomed to an overlay of racism. It is horrific and tragic but it is a fact that many people do not understand how to begin to come out at an issue or a happening through the lenses of a person of color if they are not one themselves. If people who had raided the Capitol building had been people of color ..the bodies would’ve been scattered all over the steps...As joy Reid said she wondered what it would be like to be able to approach a building and not have someone be threatened by her simply by the color of her skin
Mr Willis, Thank you for speaking from your perspective as an African-American. For many years, I have made the effort to ask myself when I encounter my Black fellow citizens, how has this person's life been made more difficult every day simply by virtue of their skin color? Sure, my life has been affected by poverty, job insecurity, misogynism, but my skin color has let me off the hook when I walk into a Starbucks and sit down without ordering to wait for a friend, off the hook when I have a taillight out in my car or when I drive a few miles over the speed limit, off the hook when I speak up a little more loudly than colleagues at faculty meetings, or when I march in protest.
Many years ago, I was teaching a college prep reading and writing class for international students and taught a unit on violence in America against BIPOC being a thread that runs through our history since before the Revolution. My mostly Japanese and Korean students were shocked - not so much at the information in that week's readings and videos, but that I, a white American, was aware of this history and wanted to discuss it. They didn't see me as someone who hates my country, but as someone who wants my country to admit its tragic flaws and strive to live up to its promise.
If young people around the world are aware of the painful and inhumane parts of our nation's history and present, certainly we here ought to expect that knowledge to inform the actions and words of our journalists, educators, and officials. Indeed, that knowledge needs to inform the actions and words of all of us.
Well, I think that this is the moment. We can sink or swim. We can find our humanness or continue to be greedy unconscious amoebas.
“A nationalist will say that “it can’t happen here,” which is the first step toward disaster. A patriot says that it could happen here, but that we will stop it.”
― Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century
Exactly. Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt. If we keep saying it can’t happen here, we are as blind as his delusional supporters only drinking different flavored koolaid.
I have kept Prof Snyder’s little book on my nightstand for four years. Prescient. History is the prologue
I don't read HuffPo and won't now so I appreciate your input here. I've written elsewhere that along with my middle school | high school | undergraduate college courses in politics, history, government and civil responsibility (1970-1980), my greatest lessons on America came from working and living abroad during the 1990's. I learned so much from my travels, breaking bread with nationals from all over the world, and having neighbors from all kinds of places. The world knows and understands more about America than her very citizens. This is why I loved Obama's great efforts at traveling the world and opening international dialogue at least.
There is a difference between "live coverage" and "political commentary." Expecting insightful analysis as an event is unfolding is, as you suggest, unrealistic, but I don't think that is what the article is pointing to. There has been plenty of analysis since, after time for reflection and dot-connecting, that has nevertheless suggested exceptionality.
This article, framing the events historically, also points to an often neglected narrative. I recommend it. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/multiracial-democracy-55-years-old-will-it-survive/617585/
Good read thank you
Thank you - I'll read it.
HuffPost article: “This exceptionalism that says ‘this doesn’t happen here’ or ‘this is not who we are’ ignores the history of America,”
Cori Bush comments on "The America that Black People Know": https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/01/09/cori-bush-capitol-mob-white-supremacy-government/
Rep.Bush proposes legislation: "Directing the Committee on Ethics to investigate, and issue a report on,
whether any and all actions taken by Members of the 117th Congress
who sought to overturn the 2020 Presidential election violated their
oath of office to uphold the Constitution or the Rules of the House
of Representatives, and should face sanction, including removal from
the House of Representatives. " https://bush.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/bush.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Rep.%20Bush_Resolution%20Condemning%20Republican%20Efforts%20to%20Overturn%20Election_2.pdf
I have written to my Congressperson in support of this legislation.
Powerful. Will do too.
Yep. We export violence as a matter business, too.
Thank you for posting, so helpful.
Thank you for sharing this article, Bill. It really articulates and binds some thoughts that have been floating loosely in my brain.
H. A Hellyer's quote within this writing is exactly the point why this country is not the superior country a lot of Americans like to feel it is. It is a lot easier for a person to look out and say look at them and not look at me and what I am doing. I am 56 and we were raised as children in school to believe us Americans are within the superior country. I remember being marched around the room singing patriotic songs. We lwere like brainwashed mini Americans. We must look within and realize we are Americans and yes other countries do watch us to see if we are growing strong as a country. The actions of these folks who appear to be brainwashed by Trumpism are showing other countries that we are not the superior country we all want to feel we are. This is dangerous for our country and our standings with the world.
Thank you Bill for this extremely cogent article. I'm not new to the concepts expressed but I am comforted by being able to see coherent and informed thought in action. That also brings me to the thought that somewhere underlying that mobs actions there may be similarly coherent thought processes occurring for which the mob served as a blunt instrument. Fortunately, at this point, that thought process has not gotten its hands on a scalpel or the skill to wield it. That doesn't mean it never will.
Get some rest, Heather. If I'm exhausted, with no particular responsibilities, I know you're way beyond spent. Thanks so much for your invaluable, unfailing efforts for all of us and our democracy. We should nominate you for the Medal of Freedom.
The idea that Trump's terrorists succeeded in attacking and damaging the U.S Capital when Bin Laden's failed is a reality I find difficult to get out of mind. I would so like to hear reaction from the widows and widowers of the heroes on Flight 93 who died to protect the Capital on 9/11. Surely they are in shock and dismay at the tarnishing of their spouse's memories by such a foul group of human slime.
Inside jobs are hard to protect against. Especially when the inside man is the commander in chief.
You got it!
Still waiting to hear what the complaint was about yesterday’s letter. So sorry you have to put up with this kind of nonsense. Your work is invaluable. Don’t stop and don’t let idiots get you down.
HCR mentioned that she has been getting a lot of hate mail these days. My hope is that this calms down and she stays safe. It seems that we have been collectively able to keep the worst of the trolls and Deplorables off this feed, but her public presence is a goad to them--especially because she is female. In my experience that absolutely sends them 'round the bend even more.
Confronting pollical corruption, racism, injustice, and inequality is always going to have serious hard core haters. Log their mail, and send the list to the FBI office. These are serious assholes and need to be on the domestic terror watch list. Its unreasonable to think that those that are radicalized are ever going to stop if not confronted. Share with other journalist and writers who are exploring the same. Social justice needs to be collaborative effort between journalist, academia, law enforcement and citizens.
When I saw this, I shared the letter again.
??
Heather posted this yesterday on Facebook:
Hi Folks:
My January 8, 2021 post has been taken down. Usually this happens when someone complains about it. The post then goes to Facebook jail until a moderator reviews it. At that point, until now, anyway, it has always come back up. I expect the same will happen this time, eventually.
I also expect that this will happen frequently for awhile, as far-right activists try to reclaim the public platforms that have now been denied them. Their panic at being kicked off Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and so on illustrates exactly what I've been trying to say about the importance of reclaiming public debate. If they didn't think taking up oxygen was important, they would not be fighting so hard to make sure they dominate public spaces.
Do remember, though, that my posts are always available-- for free-- at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com under the title "Letters from an American." You don't have to subscribe or get them through email if you don't want to; you can just go to the site and read them there. If you DO want to get them through email, you can sign up through the free option. You don't have to worry that I will use advertising or harvest emails (who am I kidding? I don't even know how! :) )
These are frightening times, and we're all tired and on edge-- me, included. It means a lot to have so many people here who care.
So thanks, yet again.
Heather
Thank you for sharing this - I was also unaware and am glad to know. Like others, I have also not been on Facebook much for a while now, having almost eliminated all social media and significantly reducing my news consumption in an effort to preserve sanity in these highly stressful times.
I go to that site to read and save her letters to my computer. Have been saving them daily since Sept 10th. That way I have just the letters themselves, rather that all the other stuff on the FB page it crops up in.
I had no idea, Kari...thank you for posting this. I go on FB sporadically these days, mostly only for Dr. R's chats. Been too busy here on substack! Thanks, again.
Me too. I appreciate Kari illuminating us.
How does this work? How do you report someone for real abuse? If Heather can get blocked for truth, but I see all kinds of real abuse/hate ? that never gets delt/deleted
You should publish the complaints that Facebook asserts against your post. I have yet to see one that cites any valid violation of their standards, by liberals, whether it has been restored or not.
It is also advisable to file a complaint of the circumstances with the FTC.
So many good things happened this week:
1. Biden proved he is presidential and not an addled old man prone to gaffs, much less a socialist.
2. Georgia assured a change in Senate control
3. The Republican Party is finally at it's turning/breaking point as to whether or not it has a future.
4. The appointment of Merrick Garland will prove to be a checkmate move. Even though we on the left are not enthralled with the man, he will be Kryptonite to the GOP's accusations of liberal commies are coming to get them.
Finally, it really doesn't matter all that much if there is a 25th Amendment or Impeachment remedy for T****. He will ultimately go down the way of Al Capone being convicted not for his most heinous crimes, but for something like tax evasion or corruption in a court where no pardon can protect him. We may not get the punishment we want but his crimes will be punished.
Meanwhile as we gird ourselves for the next attack being advertised already on the Capitol on the 17th, remember all the good things above knowing more are on the way and this time D.C. will be prepared to render a proper defense.
Hope is the absence of fear. So be hopeful.
One of the Sunday morning shows had a piece on Andy Kim (D-NJ), who passed through the Rotunda after the Electoral vote confirmation had finished, saw the maintenance staff and others cleaning up the trash, and joined in the effort for several hours (in suit and tie). That was a positive thing to witness, and Kim has become an example of an elected official who has not set himself above the fray, but continues to see himself as one of the people.
He went through my school district where I taught in South Jersey. He is such a fine, good man.
I had no idea who Andy Kim was, but when I saw that picture I was moved by the fact some guy in a suit and tie was helping with the cleanup.
And then, soon enough, some guy promptly claimed it was a staged photo-op. That saddened me. I don't know if it was or it was not, but I prefer to believe it was not; that (most) politicians are inherently Good People.
But perhaps that sentiment betrays my age, and that perhaps that perspective is now quaint and old fashioned.
When I came to this country as a young Grad Student, Reagan was President and finishing his final term. He had already forged a warm friendship with Tip O'Neill. Both of them were (by the standards of the time) fairly partisan. Yet, they formed a warm friendship and had figured out how to check their politics at the door and become friends "after 6pm".
I recall the enormous pride I felt at coming to a country with political leaders of integrity. (I had moved from India, where the assumption is that politicians are corrupt opportunist crooks). Part of that pride came from having watched a crooked President Nixon being hounded out - that ironically Nixonian message that "people have got to know whether or not their President is a crook".
I don't know if I'll ever see that sort of politics again during my lifetime. I don't know if I will ever see that country again during my lifetime.
Andy Kim, Servant Leader
That’s just awesome! Wished more would have followed suit (literally and figuratively!).
Hope is also faith in spite of fear. Faith (however manifested) that there will be a release from fear. That there means to overcome that of which one is afraid.
Always so very important to look for the good in times of distress. Your list is great. Thank you! I’m a believer in silver linings, hope, better angels, quiet miracles. The loud and raucous distractions, drama and trauma, will always be there if you want a helping or two. Or more as some seem to want and need. Staying in it makes one sick, though, just liking eating to much unhealthy food.
It takes focus, calm, and effort to do what you’ve demonstrated here. Thank you again for the reminder to watch the mental diet.
These aren't pipe dreams or pie-in-the-sky things, it's reality. It's what you chose to focus on that matters. I'm not saying ignore the bad news, I'm saying don't ignore the good.
Exactly. This is the essence of mindfulness. Centering oneself. Being completely aware of reality yet choosing efforts that serve you well and contribute to the greater good. Grass root movements. Stay out of the noise.
Thanks for that!
"Aw shucks" he said rubbing his toe in the dirt. You're welcome.
lol. Midwestern boy?
Religious follower of Twain and Vonnegut.
So it goes!
Absolutely, born in KS but I've lived in OK, TX, IL, KY, TN, WV and OH. I like to say dad could't pay the rent but that would be a lie. ;-)
Agree, but disagree on Donald Duck Rebellion. Must be held accountable. Must resign or Impeach / Remove. Without accountability, we are doomed to repeat.
If only they could. The House can vote to impeach but it will never get past the Senate. He can't resign, it will kill him to resign. Accountability will either be judicial or social/moral. If the House votes to impeach T**** will be double scarred for life and it will eat him to his dying breath that he didn't have a real presidency.
He will be punished but it will be in a court where he is beyond pardon, you know that's in the states. Just like Al Capone, he will go down on some tax related crime. I don't give a whit what nails him, I only care he's found guilty of something.....finally.
Screw him, he's a frail human being like the rest of us. What goes around has come around to finish him off.
Both banks dumped DT. Deutsche bank and Signiture bank. And dumped Ivanka from their board. How the f was Ivanka on a banks board that loaned to her dads biz? Freaking total corruption, we never learn.
Yes, mostly agree, but we need to break the delusion in most or some of his supporters. Republicans need to hold him accountable and force him to tell the truth. Or he continues to call on his supports to commit violence as that is his only leverage. Why else would we be here. This call is already out there and they are plotting now attacks at all 50 Capitols.
Without accountability, and the defenses at all Capitols hardened up, this is what his supporters are weighing their sick minds, "Where is it easiest to strike?" A soft or hard target? Without a way to communicate on SM, to amass large numbers in one place, like Jan 6th, his cells of supporters will act on their own. His supporters will strike violently at the homes of elected officials independently. This is how it went sideways in so many countries before with demagogues and dictators, in Algeria, Lebanon, Chile, Eastern Europe, Cambodia, Colombia, Russia, Central America. I want to be wrong, I hope I am wrong, but I've come to expect the worst from DT and he has always delivered.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/armed-protests-planned-50-state-capitols-fbi-bulletin/story?id=75179771
"Hope is the absence of fear. Be hopeful." Soon to be part of my email signature. Thanks.
I really enjoyed Garland nomination acceptance speech. I feel he is different. There was something different as he spoke with more gravitas, perhaps recognizing the historic nature of this moment. HE IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTING DT! First time in history for a former president and family and Rudy.
In the meantime, I highly recommend yesterday's article by Timothy Snyder, the authornof On Tyranny.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/magazine/trump-coup.html
Thanks for posting the Snyder OpEd. I passed by it earlier, but I am happy you posted it and I read it. I appreciate his analysis that there are "gamers" and "breakers" and that, among other consequences, the "gamers" will now use this event to feign sincerity to further game their power. And his paraphrasing of Hannah Arendt: "Arendt thought big lies work only in lonely minds; their coherence substitutes for experience and companionship."
Snyder’s essay is so important. We need to shift from calling it the Republican “narrative” to calling it for what it is, the big lie, and recognizing that it is not just trump, but the Republican strategy of the past 30 years. Please see my separate post about Snyder’s essay.
Thank you for posting such an excellent article. I've shared it on Fb and Twitter.
This was excellent. Thank you. I have shared.
“Yet for Congress to traduce its basic functions had a price. An elected institution that opposes elections is inviting its own overthrow.”
...which then happened Wednesday. The 12 senators but be kicked out.
Yes this is a good read
Not sure how one can talk about the dome of the Capitol without mentioning that it is topped by The Statue of Freedom. A statue built by slaves.
"While Freedom was being cast at Mills' foundry, the foreman in charge of the casting went on strike. Instead of paying him the higher wages he demanded, Mills turned the project over to Philip Reid, one of the slaves working at the facility. Reid presided over the rest of the casting and assembly of the figure.[11] Late in 1863, construction of the dome was sufficiently advanced for the installation of the statue, which was hoisted by former slaves in sections and assembled atop the cast-iron pedestal. The final section, the figure's head and shoulders, was raised on December 2, 1863, to a salute of 35 guns answered by the guns of the 12 forts around Washington, D.C."- from Wikipedia
Photo of the Statue of Freedom:
https://images.app.goo.gl/2QkEFq49bBywrkDW7
Do I understand correctly that the workers strike for higher wages resulted in making enslaved men complete the Statue of Freedom?
They would have worked on it anyway but it put a slave in charge of the work.
I think the history of the statue of Freedom as American as the dome itself.
This may be a good time to invoke some levity into our stressful lives: SEDITION! - a Randy Rainbow Parody: https://youtu.be/wT5kafhG3Qw
Yep: I got it on Friday and reposted all over the place. Randy even broke his rule about not reusing songs he has already recorded!
Thanks, Lynell! I love Randy and this was great!
So good!
Saw it yesterday. RR is the best!
Love him!
Lynell Abbott, thanks for sharing! It was hilarious 😆
Thanks, Sharon; I thought so too!
Declaration of Independence is one of four large panels in the Capital Rotunda painted by John Trumbull around 1820. Trumbull was just 19 years old when he joined the Army at the start of the Revolutionary War. He was at the Battle of Bunker Hill, though not a participant; that experience formed the basis for much of his most famous artwork. After the war, he travelled far and wide to capture the likenesses of the men who signed the Declaration so he could get their images right when he created the first version of this painting in the 1780s.
The other three Trumbull panels represent key moments in the making of America: Burgoyne's Surrender at Saratoga, Cornwallis's Surrender at Yorktown, and General George Washington Resigning His Commission to Congress. This latter subject may seem a dramaless choice, but Trumbull understood its significance.
He had been in London studying art with Benjamin West when this occurred. He had witnessed firsthand the awe and disbelief Washington's resignation had caused. Europeans could not imagine someone with the power that Washington wielded freely transferring it to the civilian authorities. Trumbull, more than most Americans, understood the significance of Washington’s gesture, and he intended to immortalize that moment.
This is just some more of the heritage that was desecrated by Trump's terrorists last week.
Hadn’t heard about this. What was done to them?
I'm sorry to have mislead you. As far as I know, there was no damage done to these paintings. I was just referring to the fact that the defiling of the Capital also defiled its contents in a figurative way.
It should be remembered that the architectural concept of the Capitol building and its dome served as a model for many State Capitol buildings throughout the country. Constructtion of the Washington Capitol began in 1793. Symbolically, it represents representative democracy both to Americans and those striving for freedom around the world. Creating Capitol buildings in the different States inspired by this concept brought representative democarcy to every corner of the United States in practical and not just legal, constitutional terms; it brought the people together to decide collectively what their future would look like.
In each we now find many Trumpian opportunists and fanatics. The fight to ensure that "government of the people, by the people for the people" survives starts in everyone's backyard; in the politics of your local district and your State elections. Clean out these Augean Stables and the results will be clearly visible in Washington.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_and_territorial_capitols_in_the_United_States
Thank you, Stuart (and others in this thread)for these insights! I'm an interior design student, and part of our program includes studying history of architecture (albeit in a truncated fashion). When Trump signed his Executive Order on Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture, I was absolutely appalled.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-promoting-beautiful-federal-civic-architecture/
Architecture is one way of us communicating across the ages and to the generations that follow. It is no surprise that this administration would go so far as tell us to forget this period of time and reject the ideas of Modernism (and the tenets with which it is coded).
Modern architecture was born toward social good and improving the lives for all. It is agnostic of one's skin color or heritage, gender identity, religion, sexual orientation. Thus, modernism celebrates diversity. It filters out the unnecessary and superfluous to bring humans into focus. Modernism responds to the universal aspirations of utility, beauty, truth, and joy.
Given the proclivities of this administration, it is no surprise that they would go so far as to write hate into the architecture of federal buildings.
e
PS- Hawaii's State Capitol is my favorite. An example of how modernism can still draw on precedents and symbolism of the past with a hopeful look to the future. Siting, reference to place, materiality, etc.
PSS - It was noted that Melania Trump has an "architecture" degree. Albeit one from a non-existent university is Slovenia. 😂
Interesting post. Thanks.
So, on Dec 18th, 45 took time from tweeting and golf to sign an executive order that includes a definition of Deconstructivist style. This may be a clue that he didn't write it all himself. Eric, I agree with you: the POTUS should have no direct role in choosing public building designs. Now I have to go look to find what other pet projects have landed on his desk after he lost the election.
[EDITED] @Jay Greenwood - Oh, anytime I see multisyllabic words I just assume it's someone else writing for him! 😂
While I think community engagement is important when it comes to things like civic buildings, I'm not privy to *this* President having a say in it.
But as Heather has pointed out time and time again, history repeats itself and we only need to look to Adolf Hitler and his architect, Albert Speer to see how this overlays with fascism and this current administration's role in that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Speer
Very nice imagery, thank you Stuart 🙏
Great photos on this link, thank you, Stuart. So it seems I must be corrected. I heard/read somewhere years ago that the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C. was the only entity "entitled" to use the spelling C-a-p-i-t-o-l; Everything else should be spelled
c-a-p-i-t-a-l.
The buildings are called Capitol because they are supposed to represent Rome's Capitoline Hill, which was the seat of the Republic. The cities themselves--as well as Washington DC--are called "capitals" as in the top of a structure (the capital of a column is the fancy bit at the top)
Thanks, Linda, for this further explanation!
good clarification -
That i didn't know, Lynell. I thought that it was perhaps a linguistic peculiarity of American English. On checking i find that Capitol is defined as the building in which the legistative branch of a government meets. So not exclusive to DC.
www.grammarly.com>blog>capital-vs-capitol
nit-picky to be sure on my part...thanks!
I think in the coming days we'll be looking very closely for head-lice eggs (nits) in our orange-haired overgrown child and his school 6 (or more) playmates from from the other side of town....both brown and white! Treatment required!
🤣
Not nit-picky! Words are important. Getting the right word is important.
Peace be upon us all.
As Heather rests, some food for thought from Timothy Snyder:
“Post-truth is pre-fascism, and Trump has been our post-truth president. When we give up on truth, we concede power to those with the wealth and charisma to create spectacle in its place. Without agreement about some basic facts, citizens cannot form the civil society that would allow them to defend themselves.”
Snyder continues to discuss our problem of trump’s big lie that he won the election and how it functions in the political power dynamics.
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1348002285297799168?s=21
Yes, the coup is ongoing.
I appreciate that Snyder calls it for what it is—the big lie—and how the masses of followers buy into it. Framing the problem as the Republican “narrative” is a more cerebral concept, more difficult to grasp its critical significance. And framing it as a matter of trump’s personality greatly narrows our examination of the scope of the problem.
Trump’s big lie and his seditious enablers do lie in the context of the Republican strategy of the past 30 years to promote propaganda over facts, like the Karl Rove quote about creating reality, and while liberals are studying it, the Republicans are creating new reality. The big lie is not just trump’s. The big lie has been the Republican strategy for the past 30 years, since Newt Gingrich:
“ In 1990, after consulting focus groups[48] with the help of pollster Frank Luntz,[49] GOPAC distributed a memo with a cover letter signed by Gingrich titled "Language, a Key Mechanism of Control", that encouraged Republicans to "speak like Newt". It contained lists of "contrasting words"—words with negative connotations such as "radical", "sick," and "traitors"—and "optimistic positive governing words" such as "opportunity", "courage", and "principled", that Gingrich recommended for use in describing Democrats and Republicans, respectively.[48]”
“ According to Harvard University political scientists Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky, Gingrich's speakership had a profound and lasting impact on American politics and health of American democracy. They argue that Gingrich instilled a "combative" approach in the Republican Party, where hateful language and hyper-partisanship became commonplace, and where democratic norms were abandoned. Gingrich frequently questioned the patriotism of Democrats, called them corrupt, compared them to fascists, and accused them of wanting to destroy the United States. Gingrich furthermore oversaw several major government shutdowns.[65][66][67][59]
University of Maryland political scientist Lilliana Mason uses Gingrich's instructions to Republicans to use words such as “betray, bizarre, decay, destroy, devour, greed, lie, pathetic, radical, selfish, shame, sick, steal, and traitors” about Democrats as an example of a breach in social norms and exacerbation of partisan prejudice.[7]”
Fact checking myself, I found some interesting facts about Newt Gingrich. He has a Ph.D. in European history and would know the history of fascism as well as Snyder, but used his knowledge to become a deceptive manipulator in pursuit of power, instead of a truth-teller like Snyder and HCR. Gingrich was a history professor prior to entering politics. So as we have become fans of history professors, we see they are not all equal!
Exemption from ethics and outright playing dirty for gain of power has also been the Republican way of the past 30 years:
“ In May 1988, Gingrich (along with 77 other House members and Common Cause) brought ethics charges against Democratic Speaker Jim Wright, who was alleged to have used a book deal to circumvent campaign-finance laws and House ethics rules. During the investigation, it was reported that Gingrich had his own unusual book deal, for Window of Opportunity, in which publicity expenses were covered by a limited partnership. It raised $105,000 from Republican political supporters to promote sales of Gingrich's book.[42] Gingrich's success in forcing Wright's resignation contributed to his rising influence in the Republican caucus.[43]”
Gingrich married his high school math teacher, then among other things, “revelations of an extramarital affair with a congressional employee 23 years his junior resulted in Gingrich's resignation from the speakership on November 6, 1998.[4][5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich
https://www.spin.com/2017/09/the-national-karl-rove-response/
Warning about POST Truth From 2016 and today Jan 12th 2021
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/welcome-to-the-post-truth-presidency/2016/12/02/baaf630a-b8cd-11e6-b994-f45a208f7a73_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/01/12/we-must-end-post-truth-society/
When my dad told me about this he said that, early in the Civil War, from the roof of the Capital dome, the carpenters could see the Confederate army on the far side of the Potomac. Even so, President Lincoln insisted that they continue building the Capital’s dome. I thought of this on January 6, even after a riot and loss of life, the senators and congress people returned to the task of certifying the results of the election.