623 Comments
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 21, 2022

Heather, I've been reading your synopses for months now, as well as viewing your video chats. I have just now become a subscriber to your "Letters from an American." It's about time I did so. Why? First, I now feel that I am part of a very special community, and being in community is very important to me. Second, I truly appreciate your hard work in pursuit of getting the truth out about contemporary political events against the backdrop of American history. You are clearly a person of great integrity and are performing such a valuable service to me and many others whose understanding of the political underpinnings of American history needs boosting. I was raised in a small farming community in Western Minnesota (famous only as the home town of the renowned poet, translator, and social critic Robert Bly, who was also a Harvard alum). Growing up in relative isolation from national events, much less world events, I received (like many others) a very inadequate education regarding the history of our country. Thankfully, my horizons were broadened significantly by my higher education at the University of Minnesota, Union Theological Seminary in NYC, Penn State, Indiana University, a German university, and considerable travel throughout the U.S., Europe, and Japan. Nevertheless, it is YOU I want to thank for providing me, on an ongoing basis, with a deeper understanding of our nation's great achievements and its oft-hidden flaws. I am truly grateful for your insights. I wish you good energy as you persevere in sharing your perspectives and your vision for a renewal of our democracy as one that is "of the people, by the people, for the people."

Expand full comment

Welcome, Michael. HCR's Substack community is like no other--great brain power, heart, and respectfulness. Out of this community evolved, "We the People, All of Us This Time!"

Expand full comment

Do tell about We the People, All of US This Time. Thanks

Expand full comment

We at "Heather's Herd" have embraced "We the People, All of Us This Time" as our motto for political advocacy. Jeff Carpenter is a wonderful artist who created a beautiful logo for it. Ellie Kona, how do we get mugs?!

Expand full comment

Yay! I didn't realize we have a mug! I just ordered it.

Expand full comment

Me too!

Expand full comment

Marcy, I did find it. You made it easy. I made it hard. In any event if people are interested in a different design by me with custom ink’s help, I would be happy to do that. Like I said there’s no cost to us and they will give us a free quote

Expand full comment

Yay! Thank You Marcy!

Expand full comment

I’m not having any luck ordering. It says no longer available.

Expand full comment

My 3 mugs arrived yesterday! Maybe I should have only ordered 2?

Expand full comment

How much of the proceeds from mug sales is given to Heather's 501c3 organization?

Expand full comment

First I didn’t even know she had a 501(c) three. In any event this is not a profit making venture for us. I believe custom ink has some provisions for sharing income from the purchase of these proposed mugs. Let me be clear I have absolutely no financial interest in trying to come up with a nicely designed coffee mug or have any interest in making money. I am a retired attorney and have no need for any profit making ventures. if people are potentially interested I would be happy to be the focal point between us and custom ink or Zazzle if that’s better. I contacted custom Ink and they are willing to help come up with a design with me and thereafter making a proposal to us meaning this group of ours. If there are any proceeds from mug sales it certainly could be given to Heathers 501(c) three as far as I’m concerned. I had a couple of T-shirts made just for me from custom Ink So I am a little bit familiar with how they operate. Obviously the more of an item you purchase the less it costs. The other thing they mentioned to me is that if other people wanted my particular design There could be proceeds from that. Since I had no interest in selling my T-shirt design I never followed up with trying to market it. Perhaps that might be a way to get proceeds for Heathers 501(c) three. In any event I think taking this one step at a time would be best. I assume Zazzle would do the same.

So George what do you think? Since there’s no cost I may well go ahead, create a design and get a proposal from custom ink and or Zazzle.

Who created the other mug that was referred to here? I do recall they used Zazzle. Perhaps they could give us some additional input. I really don’t want to get in a conflict about this but I felt I would like a different design. Hopefully no one is offended by that.

While I’m at it I was thinking about in addition to words nicely displayed “letters from an American“ and maybe HCR also, I was looking for some symbol related to the state of Maine. I think the white pine is the state tree but I was looking at other possibilities. Maybe some here and could suggest some symbol. I would prefer The symbol not be obvious in this sense. If the tree was used it would simply be the tree no other words describing the tree. It would kind of be an inside understanding in this group. Meaning those of us herein would know that the tree or other symbol of Maine was representational of where HCR lives.

Ok feedback please.

Expand full comment

Here is a link to a mock up for the cup and other info. Tell me what you think.

https://www.customink.com/designs/mug/hej0-00cj-4h4p

Expand full comment

Where do you sign up for Heathers Herd ?

Expand full comment

Ally, appreciate your wanting to let folks know about us, but we've got a pretty good system for recruiting and vetting applicants to weed out trolls and other disrupters. I believe you have been in contact with us, but not actually attended a meeting where we always talk about our process. Please contact us through the private email previously provided to you by Ellie.

Expand full comment

Heather's Herd nothing - make that Heather's ARMY!

Expand full comment

Hello, Michael! I too am a UTS alum and got sent to Wiesbaden Germany, ostensibly for a year, right after graduation in a 1-year partnership role with the UCC-NY and the EKHN. That was 2013 and I'm still here, having landed in the only Confessing Church in the entire area - The Bergkirche. Wiesbaden was very brown. It's fascinating to be living in a social democracy of the type I hoped for when I stuffed envelopes for Michael Harrington's presidential attempt back in the 70s. The only somewhat positive outcome for the US that I see right now is knowing that Germany had to totally collapse and rebuild in order to come out from under the stain of an authoritarian madman.

Expand full comment

They acknowledged their period of horror, So many in America never have. Ike made sure of it “Get it all on record now - get the film - get the witnesses - because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.” And he did get the films and the witnesses. And still the bastards yelp

Expand full comment

I, too, am a UTS alum. Probably quite a few of us here.

Expand full comment

I'm sure of that! And I even "met" a woman who with her husband are friends with my advisor, Gary Dorrien, who wanted to be a baseball player!

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 19, 2022

Thanks much for the comment, Rosalind. After my junior year in college I spent three months at the Gossner-Haus (part of Germany's "innere Mission") in Mainz-Kastel. On several Sundays I attended worship services at an "evangelische Kirche" in Wiesbaden-Biebrich. The minister was an older man and was extraordinarily friendly to all. He shook everyone's hand following worship. The sanctuary was packed every Sunday. That amazed me in view of the fact that, ordinarily, Germans seldom attend church. BTW, that was in the summer of 1964.

Expand full comment

Was that the baroque Hauptkirche in Biebrich? There are some churches in Wiesbaden that are well-attended. The Bergkirche is one of them and still has a "different" feel to it. For example, they took on an aging theologian for a year where none of the other congregations in the deanery had any interest in me. It was, as they say, a match made in heaven. That was in 2013 and the English Community Outreach was the first non-German speaking offering, as far as we know, within the Evangelische Kirche structure in Germany.

Expand full comment

It might have been the Heilig-Geist-Kirche (am Kupferberg 2), although the building appears to have been renovated since the mid-1960s.

Expand full comment

Then I think I know which church you mean.

When I was here in the early 1970s there was a strong Mormon presence, likely still is.

When I arrived in Wiesbaden, 2013, there were southern baptist, presbyterian and other conservative services in English. There was also the 1835 built St. Augustine of Canterbury anglican episcopal church, which has a very healthy congregation and tons of music (the anglicans have the the best church music anyway - at least we classical singers think so ;-}.

But our little English Community Outreach was the first to partner with the Evangelische tradition through an english language worship. It was a thrill to gently tweak the traditional service into gender-inclusive (ex: G-d of Love instead of God the Father - little things that made a difference, especially to the ears of Germans and was welcomed by folks who weren't so friendly with church talk.)

Expand full comment

Interesting. Thanks for filling me in on some of the ecclesiastical geography of Wiesbaden. I have wondered what the church in Germany has been doing regarding using inclusive language. Furthermore, just how large is the English-speaking population in the Wiesbaden area? I recall that the USAF has had a base there for a long time. What about nonmilitary ex-pats? If I were to retire to Germany, I would choose either Wiesbaden or Ulm (with its famous Protestant minster). I spent an academic year in Bochum thanks to an exchange program between my university (the University of Minnesota) and the Ruhr-Universität, but I didn't much care for the environment. I did get to know some wonderful people there, though, and I still stay in touch with the only German family I know; we have a 43-year history together. The aunt of the family (born in 1907) was a retired English teacher at a local Gymnasium and became a close friend. Like her niece and nephew, she was a "PK" and regularly attended one of the local Protestant churches (through which I first became acquainted with the family). "Tante Gertrud" shared a number of her experiences during the war and even had me read (aloud) portions of the diary she kept during those horrible years. She wrote (and talked) about) the many air raids over Bochum (where the Krupp steel works manufactured armaments). When the sirens sounded, she and other residents took shelter in the many coal mine shafts that honeycombed the subterranean regions of the city and suburbs. She was a pacifist and a Quaker through and through, and therefore was unable to find work except for doing some private tutoring. I found it remarkable that she exhibited no sign of bitterness over the devastation of the city she loved or her dismissal from the Gymnasium. Rather, she showed nothing but kindness. Truly, she was a person of deep faith and uncommon generosity. I am thankful to have known her.

In a previous comment I mentioned the Goβner-Haus on the banks of the Rhine in Mainz-Kastell. I lived in, and participated in the life of, that institution for three months in the (hot) summer of 1964. I grew very fond of that place, as well as the area in general. Goβner housed a few foreign students, but mostly young apprentices in various industries. Most of them didn't know their fathers, some of whom had been American GIs from WWII. While web-surfing yesterday, I learned that that facility had been transformed into high-end condominiums. Prime real estate, I guess.

I haven't been back to the Mainz-Wiesbaden-Frankfurt area since my university days but would love to visit it again. As I said earlier, I have even considered spending at least a portion of my later years in Germany. But time is passing quickly, the pandemic endures, and, although I am lucky to be in excellent health at age 78, I don't know how much time remains to me (although I guess I shouldn't worry about that). Furthermore, my wife would never want to move away from home (we are native Minnesotans). So, life is always somewhat more complicated than appears on the surface.

Expand full comment

The church I was referring to was a post-war structure. I don't remember its name. At that time (1964), worship services were held only in German. I probably have a photograph of it somewhere.

Expand full comment

A hearty Welcome to the community, Michael. I have read some of your posts - and even replied to one or two - and have deeply appreciated what you have contributed. I look forward to reading more, and learning from what you have to say.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Welcome Michael. We look forward to hearing your thoughts.

If you have some time, HCR's "To Make Men Free: History of the Republican Party" is absolutely sterling historical reading.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your comment, Mike. Having read "To Make Men Free," I fully agree that it is "sterling historical reading."

Expand full comment

Welcome Michael from another recent member of this amazing community. I'm 76 and only newly aware of how woefully lacking has been my education in the history of this country. For the first time I feel that I have a daily source of good information about the present day, firmly rooted in a clear vision of our past. PS Re your mention of UTS in NYC, I am a graduate of Virginia Theological Seminary, with a love for NYC as a born and bred Long Islander!

Expand full comment

Gammon at ITC. We could form a caucus, but I think just being here is enough.

Expand full comment

GA, by way of IL, NJ, CA, NC. Outrunning the law all the way. Oops....

Expand full comment

Thanks for the LOL - I take it wherever I can find it!!!!

Expand full comment

Amen! Dr. Richardson is a premier example of what really makes America great. All of us who follow her analysis form a cadre that that will have to begin the long effort to clean up the nearly fatal desecration of the fundamental progressive ideals that have inspired the American impulse toward democracy and justice. Let's all work to really make America even greater than it was prior to the election of our last President, what's his name.

Expand full comment

Thank you for joining our community, Michael Burwell. I look forward to your comments and exchanges with subscribers should you participate on the forum.

Expand full comment

Morning Fern.🦋

Expand full comment

Good Morning, Marcia. 🪴

Expand full comment

Are you thawing out ? Looked bad up there ?

Expand full comment

With appreciation for your thoughtfulness. The sun is shining, and I cannot wait to be outside. I'm working on three different issues unrelated to the Letter, so will not be on the forum again today. We had a lot of wind and water, but I'm still above ground. Thank you, Marcia. You sound/write with spirit and conviction as usual. Cheers, Fern

Expand full comment

Amen Michael. Your voice will be wonderful to have here.

Expand full comment

I'm so glad to have joined this group.

Expand full comment

Welcome, Michael, to our thought-full group! Looking forward to your insights and perspectives. My wonderful mother was born and raised near Currie, MN, south of your family's home. She is the one who instilled a fever for justice in me and my siblings, for which I am so grateful.

Expand full comment

“You are clearly a person of great integrity and are performing such a valuable service”

Expand full comment

Welcome to this fine community, Michael. You will enjoy the wide range of knowledge and wisdom put forth here.

Expand full comment

(Sweden)

Robert Bly! One of my favorites; quote him ever so often. And now you Michael Burwell!

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 19, 2022

Greetings, Olof! You probably know that Robert Bly (who died in December) was of Norwegian heritage. He performed a great service in introducing Scandinavian poets to American readers. Our home community of Madison, Minnesota, was populated primarily by Norwegians and Swedes. This is true also for the communities surrounding Madison. I am Norwegian on my mother's side. My maternal great-grandmother emigrated from Solor (NE of Oslo) in 1882 at age 24. After she was widowed, she lived with our family until her death in 1956 (I was 13 at the time). She never learned much English; she didn't have to, as her circle of friends all spoke Norwegian. Even my maternal grandmother grew up speaking Norwegian and was confirmed in the Norwegian language in nearby Dawson. Incidentally, to give equal time to the Swedish, I hasten to add that my wife is half-Swedish. Her mom grew up listening to the cadences of the Swedish language in Southern Minnesota.

Expand full comment

I learnt to know Robert Bly at a poetry festival here in my home town, Malmo. He told his story of going to live with his maternal grandfather, so his father would not beat him to death. After not seeing his father alive again he read the poem of reconciliation that he had written and read at his fathers funeral, and he then said: "I don't think a man can love a woman without being reconciled with his father, and I think it is similar with a woman and her mother", which I have often quoted.

I spent a year at Montana State University (1963-64). One day I heard a student speaking with a Stockholm accent, and asked him in Swedish if he was from Stockholm. I had to repeat it in English because he didn't speak any Swedish, but he said: "my grandfather was from Stockholm"! - Sometimes amazing how traces of history is coming through.

Expand full comment

Welcome Michael. You will find this a true community like few others gathered on the internet. Insight. Caring. Commitment. Look forward to hearing more from you!

Expand full comment

Glad to have another Midwesterner along. I got hooked on the plain intelligence in Heather's daily work and that of the community's members. Love to listen to the discourse. And share.

Expand full comment

Welcome aboard. This is indeed a community!

Expand full comment

I'm glad you've joined our community, Michael.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Beautiful, succinct and frightening. I have been a lawyer for more than 50 years, and involved in politics for longer than that, but I did not fully realize how close we came to the precipice last year. As a certain former president would say, “Lock them up!” And as another former president would say, these events present us with the question of whether any nation so conceived and so dedicated as the United States can long endure.

Expand full comment

Hi Jon. That your comment, with which I predictably agree, appears on this site, which of course I also frequent, though I only occasionally comment on Ms. Richardson’s estimable letters, is itself predictable. Best regards. Bob

Expand full comment

Hey stranger! Small worlds.

Expand full comment

Attributed to Stalin “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how, but what is extraordinarily important is this - who will count the votes, and how.” The Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretary. The republicans are well-versed in fascists verbiage and evil actions. All in the open, there is not an innocent among them. Thanks to Heather for distinguishing between voter fraud and election fraud, now tell Rupert and the MSM. Way past time for them to acknowledge what we see with our own eyes. Well, those of us, not in the cult.

Expand full comment

Jeri,

Wow! Great and important quote. Trump and Stalin's quote are almost identical around the vote counting.

Stalin starved 38 million people in the 1930's with his failed collective farm experiment.

I wonder if Trump would also do that too?

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Trump is a democidal sociopathic narcissistic maniac. Nothing would stop him from harming anyone standing in his way in his last for $ and power and to stay out of jail. Remember. This by Martin Niemueller

" First they came for the Communists

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me

And there was no one left

To speak out for me"

Expand full comment

Rev. Niemueller summed things up well--succinctly yet thoroughly.

Expand full comment

A fine poem. Am glad to be reminded of it. Niemoeller spoke at the seminary I attended back in the mid-1960s. Did you know that he had been a U-Boot commander in WW I?

Expand full comment

I knew of Rev. Niemueller's U-boat service in WWI. And, my father briefed me on the importance of Niemueller in taking on the Nazi regime. His stand on principle cost him eight years in prison and mainly in Dachau. Dad was a U.S. Army officer in North Africa and Italy during WWII. He gave me a great, official U.S. Army photo of Niemueller shortly after N was liberated from Dachau and was in a U..S. refugee center in Italy. In the photo, N is speaking with a U.S. Army lieutenant who, with his family, had been members of N's congregation in Germany before the war started. The lieutenant's family fled to the U.S. at that time while the border was still open.

Expand full comment

No. White men who are rural farmers are heavily subsidized with federal funds. Particularly during the previous administration. They, also, owe loyalty to cult Republicans or the new autocratic party.

Expand full comment

Especially after Trump tanked them with his embargo on trade with China.

Expand full comment

Generous welfare, often for people who don't need it.

Expand full comment

That's a good point.

Expand full comment

Collective farms would not be the tactic of the Trump cult anyway. They plan to accomplish mass extermination in a more direct fashion. Just ask them.

Expand full comment

The first victims? Journalists. Don't think for a second that they don't have an extensive enemies' list. But not extermination. Long prison sentences.

Expand full comment

In a heartbeat, if it offered any benefit at all to TFFP's wallet, his ego or the retention of his power. (The Former Failed President)

Expand full comment

Nah, only 850,00 in a pandemic.

Expand full comment

TFG is even a loser to Stalin! So far . .

Expand full comment

No kidding Ally. But there is a part of me that believes because of 1st Amendment Rights, they speak it to stay Relevant and “ Out Front”. And us talking about them in our disgust of them helps that. There is no level to low like the scum off the bottom of my shoes that they won’t go down to for the sake of “Winning !” And My own thoughts, I highly doubt you will get Ivanka or Mel ( if it really was her ?) to play again ? He’s just the “Snake Charmer “playing his Pungi “ for them.Swampy Trump. Oops ! I mean Swami. No, I was right the first time.

Expand full comment

I was having a fairly decent day, but of course, reality set in as I was reading today's column. Like many others, I don't understand why DOJ isn't going after the lead seditionists. I don't understand why more Americans aren't raising hell about the open planning for election fraud, seemingly aided these days by SCOTUS. Why are Congressional Republicans so scared of Trump and his extremist base? Then there's Mike Pence, who apparently was ready to go along w/ the insurrection plans until he realized he'd be blamed if it went wrong. I need chocolate. Or vodka. Or both.

Expand full comment

Recently, I watched a series of videos about dam failures. they start with faulty engineering and shortcuts in construction. Then, the pressure to perform in extreme conditions. The failure starts with little cracks, a trickle of water that undermines the integrity of the structure. Eventually the failure accelerates to a point of massive failure. I'm hoping that the house of cards that was the MAGA hoard's electoral fraud scheme will follow a similar path as a poorly engineered dam, attempting to withstand increasing pressure of public scrutiny, congressional investigation, investigative journalism and action by our justice department.

Expand full comment

There are already some signs that it will. Let's be careful not to be downstream when it happens. The MAGgots are going to feel betrayed and react with anger.

Expand full comment

I am nervous about trump, an extreme narcissist now being ever increasingly backed into a corner…a position that causes narcissists to lash out, a time when they are most dangerous. The great Jamie Raskin said something akin to the J6 hearings “blowing the roof off” this week with new revelations. Trump knows what these revelations are, and I suspect he has a plan to respond/minimize the damage/divert the news headlines. I don’t want to sound alarmist, but this moron and his band of thieves should not be underestimated.

Expand full comment

If Jamie Raskin said something to that effect, that's **very** encouraging.

Expand full comment

Do you know him/them or what. He is easy to call, despite being a loose cannon. the cult is devotion personified. Bad combo.

Expand full comment

And a wolf moon tonight. How fitting.

Expand full comment

Cathy, I really agree with you. My hope is that a majority of MAGAts will not be willing to risk violence; however, a great deal of trouble can be caused by just a few of them, as we now know. I agree with you that there will indeed be a reaction.

Expand full comment

Actions deserve reactions. It will be up to each individual to determine its effect. Or affect. I will not have any trouble with that.

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

Tragically, it's possible to read your comment as being about the current assaults on our democracy, whose integrity is being undermined by some of the very people sworn by oath to defend it. I hope I'm wrong and you're right.

Expand full comment

I would go farther and suggest that Nathan's dam is a perfect metaphor for our democracy itself, even an analogy. The faulty engineering we can blame on the founders, but despite amendments intended to shore up the document, cracks began forming about 40 years ago and now water is rushing through them and the whole structure is beginning to shake and shudder. And we are like a sleeping village downriver...

Expand full comment

This is what happened to a sleepy village in the Ahr valley this past august:

https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/rheinland-pfalz/koblenz/vorher-nachher-flutkatastrophe-ahr-100.html

The entire village is so destroyed, the government has decided to help the residents find a place to rebuild.

Realizing this as the Non Sequitur it is, I can't help but think of the Ashokan Reservoir near Woodstock. Several villages were drowned in order for New York City to have the water they've enjoyed lo these many years. Some days I feel like the US is being drowned so that the Dixiecrats Manchin and Sinema the former party of Lincoln can reassert their thievery of the US for big business and the dwindling white America.

Expand full comment

Let's bring back the Dixiecrats label!

Expand full comment

Yep, goos analysis. First cracks began to be VISIBLE in 1980ish.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Democracy swept away and forever buried under the the effluent of bigotry, greed, and the certainty of the foolish few. A bit too long to fit on a tombstone, probably, but, perhaps not too long for the last headline in the WaPo?

Expand full comment

Hey Fred, it's the effluent of affluence, too, excessive and poorly distributed. If we're lucky we'll all soon be fighting for mere survival, just like the good old days in the Horn of Africa. So much for large crania...

Expand full comment

I was imagining the scheme to undermine the election as the poorly engineered/constructed dam. I'm hoping the House select committee and the DOJ will ultimately wash that construct into the gutter and toss it's perpetrators into jail.

It may also be a useful metaphor for the key documents defining our republic and it's rules of conduct.

Expand full comment

Those dam seditionists...Thanks Nathan, and stay on high ground!

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

When I started reading your post I thought you were going to compare the dam to our fragile democracy.

Faulty engineering- A constitution written by and for wealthy white men.

Shortcuts in construction- compromises that left so much power with the states. Pressure to perform in extreme conditions-globalization, the rise of China, a new economy and the effects on the working class.

Little cracks-outsourcing, NAFTA, the Contract with America, the 2000 election, birtherism, the Tea Party, Shelby v. Holder, the Murdochs, Fox, Trump, SCOTUS

Massive failure- January 6…….

Expand full comment

That analogy rings true! So many destroying the "dam" of our democracy, and so many failing to protect it.

Expand full comment

from your mouth...

Expand full comment

"The cracks that let the light in."

Expand full comment

Systemic failure. Yep, that's where our political system is headed. See https://media.awakeningtowholeness.net/newusa-part-3/ for my humble opinion of what is about to happen.

Expand full comment

Well MSM

Expand full comment

It’s systemic. It must be. The letter informs us. I read it again and I almost throw up. So many R’s must be in on it. Even Grassley has been turned! I fear Garland can’t arrest them all. Would it be half the senate and 40% of the house, how many in the state legislatures? What are the optics to acting justly when their constituents are so disillusioned ? If Garland can get us out of this, he will be the AG GOAT. Yes, please another what ever ur having.

Expand full comment

I wonder if Garland is feeling a strong sense of destiny. I willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he is working extremely hard on this. I'm sure he realizes he has one shot at getting this right.

Expand full comment

One shot. That’s the important part. Miss the Grizzley and you’re toast

Expand full comment

Garland may be worried about being put in a penal colony when Trump wins the next election.

Expand full comment

I reckon his best course of action is to ensure Frump is in prison by then

Expand full comment

we still have Guantanamo, perhaps we can repurpose it to "enemies of the republic, both foriegn AND domestic?

Expand full comment

In which case he is chickenshit. Yes, easy for me to say....

Expand full comment

I agree. I would expect given the complexity of the situation and the power of the people involved he has to proceed carefully and make his one shot count. I am not concerned with his slow, deliberative approach. The situation calls for it.

Expand full comment

Yes, Gina, but it must happen soon enough for the average American voter to understand and vote accordingly. Timing may be everything.

Expand full comment

The televised hearings, likely to start in February or April, are the linchpin. Hopefully, a compelling narrative of an attempt to end our democratic system through seditious conspiracy will rivet the nation.

Expand full comment

Agree, and hope that the Congressional Committee is able to reveal the depth of the conspiracy in a convincing manner as we wait for Garland to do more. The arrest of the Oath Keepers gives me hope.

Expand full comment

That Grassley was in on it really expands the breadth of this for me!

Expand full comment

Me too! Like any older Iowa grandpa gets conned out of his farm by a NY city slick hustler. It’s crazy!!!!

Expand full comment

I agree. One would think at this late, late stage of his career he would have maintained integrity. Is the prospect of fading from public life so horrifying old men will do anything (e.g., Giuliani, Grassley)?

Expand full comment

... how can anyone maintain what they never had in the first place?

Expand full comment

Marcy, nothing worse than old GOP men.

Expand full comment

IMHO, a more prompt and certain justice action would have made matters much more clear and quite possibly worse in the short term. I regret the time lapse. There are so very many collaborators: terrifying, actually.

Expand full comment

If it is prompt, then it is UNcertain justice. I have full faith in AG Garland, the DOJ, the Congressional January 6 Committee, court of the Southern District of New York, and President Biden.

Expand full comment

MaryPat, I am watching and waiting, lacking faith, hoping like hell.

Expand full comment

I feel you…I go back and forth especially after my governor race here in Virginia.

Expand full comment

Where and when did a democracy avert such calamity as we are going through now? I ask, cuz I only know the failed ones. Excuse me while I go throw up, again.

Expand full comment

Why is Pence so reluctant to talk to the J6 committee? He’s a hero in this debacle. Is it his wanting to be president someday (not on my watch)? Is it his religious fervor that makes him turn the other cheek (Jesus never said people should not be accountable)? It’s not hyperbole to say tfg would not have cared if Pence HAD been killed. Feeding his narcissism was most important.

Expand full comment

Pence wants in on the authoritarian government that is eventually established. He just did not want to help Trump be the dictator.

Expand full comment

Pence has an identity, and he is locked to it. To speak out is to incriminate himself in the plot, to do so he admits he is part of team seditious. To tell the truth he becomes like one of Nixon’s thugs.

Expand full comment

He went to Hungary , he agrees with the plan, maybe just not how he was involved in that part of the execution...he is lily white & knee deep.

Expand full comment

I agree, Pence is a bit of a question mark. I hope he has to give public, sworn testimony pretty soon.

Expand full comment

He thinks chump will run and win in 2024, or some other cretin will

Expand full comment

I'm in sorrow for your emesis, but I certainly identify.

Expand full comment

They don't refer to him as 'snake in the grassley' back home for nothing.

Expand full comment

Grassley spilt the beans and laid bare the conspiracy. Reporters should have followed up deeper and pulled on that thread.

Expand full comment

Me three!

Expand full comment

And Joe still calls them friends???

Expand full comment

That is political peace jargon ... " our 'friends' across the aisle ..." even though ....

Expand full comment

... Grassley? ... turned from what ...?

Expand full comment

Yes to that. He was giving president Obama fits. Grassley’s been getting much worse lately - all in for TFG.

Expand full comment

From whatever to a felon.

Expand full comment

Thank you Ted. I don't really know what his background is/was - never have been impressed with him as a power broker or man of remarkable integrity - he always has struck me as a pawn in someone else's game - so I guess it is no big surprise that he wound up in a position of influence, relied upon to play for the team, regardless of what that might mean in the big picture ....

Expand full comment

Grassley is old enough to know better.

Expand full comment

So are most of the cult nuts I know

Expand full comment

I doubt it has much to do with age ...

Expand full comment

I am so with you! Why aren't more people up in arms and trying to do something about the travesty of justice that could have happened. I am not a fan of Pence, but I am grateful he had the moral & ethical character to do what was right. Thank God! Imagine if he hadn't?!

Expand full comment

MJ, I think he was just trying to save his posterior unit. He realized that he was the chosen fall guy when he heard about the gallows being built....and he refused to get into the escape limo with the Secret Service. Didn’t want to be “taken for a ride,” and he knew very well what his raging boss was capable of. Everything and everyone touched by the former guy dies, and Pence knew his only chance was to run a legal electoral vote count.

Expand full comment

Gus-did you see Rachel Maddow's show last night? She discussed that it would appear he knew about the forged EC votes by the additional wording he added to the traditional phrasing of announcement of the Vote Count. Here's her discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPfcI9WYZzQ

Expand full comment

Pretty amazing. I missed TRMS last night, so thanks for including the clip!

Expand full comment

he did indeed

Expand full comment

Gus, I think you’re 💯%. Pence was at least smart enough to know his butt would be on the line. I honestly don’t see him as a man of integrity, but will take whatever personality trait made him say no to the coup.

Expand full comment

You got it Gus. My question is: who tipped Pence off? There is still more to this than meets the eye. God, what a cliff hanger movie this is going to be. Any screen writers out there?

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Charlie, I think it was Dan Quayle! Apparently Pence called him, and Dan pulled no punches:

there was only one thing Pence could do, and he better do it -- the straight up constitutional way. Seems like the old potato man developed some actual wisdom during all of his years out of office....

Expand full comment

Costa and Woodward report that Pence rang up Quayle in late December to ask if there was any way he could give Trump want he wanted, according to the Washington Post:

Quayle was adamant, according to the authors. “Mike, you have no flexibility on this. None. Zero. Forget it. Put it away,” he said.

But Pence pressed him, the authors write, asking if there were any grounds to pause the certification because of ongoing legal challenges. Quayle was unmoved, and Pence ultimately agreed, according to the book..

Expand full comment

Lordy, just like Adolf killed off some of his boot lickers

Expand full comment

Exactly! Thank you, Gus. He was never a hero. He chose to save his skin.

Expand full comment

Is there chocolate vodka???

Expand full comment

I have a bottle of coffee flavored tequila …the “coffee” means it’s meant for mornings- right??

Expand full comment

😂😂😂😂

Expand full comment

😂😂😂😂😂

Expand full comment

Of course. Makes a yummie martini. I have a killer recipe for Christmas Eve.

Expand full comment

yum

want it

Expand full comment

1. Must have a real shaker and lots of ice.

Expand full comment

we are chilly up in the Olympic Peninsula

Expand full comment

Garnish the rim of the tall martini glass with chocolate/coca powder, & cinnamon, hint of nutmeg or allspice, Freeze and have ready. fill the shaker with ice, vodka, chocolate liqueur, maybe a splash of Kalua, splash of cinnamon something, $ hint of bitters, shake the hella out of it and pour. I can add a little flame to this but let’s not burn the house down just yet.

Expand full comment

Chocolate and espresso martinis a fave during the winter season. So delicious. I love making them.

Expand full comment

Mike Pence, with his many flaws, actually cares enough about democracy to refuse to kill it or step aside for Grassley to kill it. Credit where credit is due.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

I suspect he just despised Trump and did not want him as President again.

I don't think he would have had a problem if another Republican, with more intelligence and less mental illness, would have pulled the stunt.

Expand full comment

Do you really think he despised chump, if so, he hid it well…

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Yes, Trump treated routinely treated Pence like the village idiot in public. Pence could not have failed to notice EVEN given that fact that he almost 100% of the time was pretending to be retarded.

He is not retarded, just looks that way.

Expand full comment

Remember the fly in his helmet, er I mean hair. It’s how I will always remember him 🤷‍♂️

Expand full comment

A greatly needed moment of national hilarity, it was. 🪰

Expand full comment

... pretty sure he did what he had to do - and probably did not enjoy it much at all ... Pence strikes me as a good, obedient son, committed to serve the purpose of his station - following orders as given ... so 'who's your daddy now ...?'

Expand full comment

Didn’t Pence also refuse to leave the Capitol building on 1/6?

Expand full comment

Yes, he did, even though Trump and minions were threatening his life. It’s interesting how many otherwise horrendous Republican officials held the line and stood up to Trump and his thugs.

Expand full comment

I wonder if, in addition to waiving concerns for his own safety, he also did not want to surrender the Capitol to the rioters?

Expand full comment

I think he realized that it would have put him behind the eight ball…

Expand full comment

Rupert has never told the cult anything except that Dems are doing exactly what the repubs are doing. Exactly like he never showed chump except as a Superman caricature. Propaganda works.

Expand full comment

Chocolate ice cream with a splash of vodka definitely.

Expand full comment

We use to call this drink a mudslide.

Expand full comment

We might do better with a whole lot of vodka and a splash of chocolate ice cream.

Expand full comment

Wish we could share a serving!

Expand full comment

Laurie-did you see Rachel Maddow's show last night? She discussed that it would appear he knew about the forged EC votes by the additional wording he added to the traditional phrasing of announcement of the Vote Count. Here's her discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPfcI9WYZzQ

Expand full comment

I think there's some chocolate vodka in our cabinet - come on over!

Expand full comment

Our democracy hinged on: the military brass stepping back from Trump's attempt to mobilize them on American soil; election officials refusing GOP commands to hand Trump a win out of thin air; DOJ officials threatening to quit en masse rather than violate their oaths; and Capitol police refusing to be goaded into opening fire and giving Trump the bloodbath he so craved as an excuse to declare martial law.

Meanwhile, the entire apparatus of the GOP is at Trump's beck and call.

And Mancin and Sinema are obstructing passage of bills their party ran on. Mancin and Sinema are hell bent, or plain old bent, or GOP bound to let the rare opportunity to do good, necessary big things which we worked so hard for, slip away,

We cannot and many are not just spectators or commenters. We need to turn out in overwhelming numbers to vote. Meanwhile for every comment to the choir, please let's write more letters to the editors.

Expand full comment

lin your list of democratic players pushing back against the attempt to subvert our democracy is what the traitors would call “the deep state.” “The deep state” is their label for the forces of democracy.

LONG LIVE THE DEEP STATE‼️

Expand full comment

... and F—K the pieces of racist garbage occupying our country who are working so hard to return us to the Deep South dictatorship of pre-Voting Rights Act

Expand full comment

Fantastic summary, Lin. So few, knee-deep in it, doing their job, saved us from the brink.

Expand full comment

Yes, including notably in your state. Where we saw in Raffensperger, the self contradiction of being a 'good German' (ie voting for a Republican regime and a Trump administration, both of which are essentially lawless) and being an honorable person (upholding the election law.)

Expand full comment

Lin, I beg to differ. I, too, thought his principles were exemplary, but as it turned out, he was defending his shiny new voting equipment (and also was probably considering the downside of his cooperation - prosecution). As soon as he caught heat from the Deplorables for his "principled" stand, he jumped right into Kemp's plans for voter suppression, including the voter nullification portion. That he voted for TFG TWICE says it all. The title of his book, "Integrity Counts," is laughable.

Expand full comment

a portion of my communication with Sinema:

Yall are without intelligence.

"Thank you for contacting my office. I am proud to serve the people of Arizona, and I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me. Please consider this message confirmation that we have received your correspondence.

If you would like to stay connected to our office with the latest news, legislation, and other useful information, please visit my website at https://sinema.senate.gov. Thank you for contacting me."

Expand full comment

I've received the same response multiple times re: my emails to her about the filibuster and voting rights. More encouraging is the response I got from Patty Murray, which includes: "Since its creation, the Senate has only needed a simple majority to pass bills and confirm nominees. The exceptions to this rule are clearly spelled out in the Constitution. However, the Senate has changed its own rules regularly over the course of its history, including those relating to how it considers, debates, and votes on different types of bills and nominees. Although the simple majority threshold to pass a bill still stands, today’s Senate requires three-fifths of the body—60 senators—to vote to end debate on a bill or on a motion pertaining to a bill, a procedure known as cloture. In practice, this rule imposes a 60-vote threshold on nearly every piece of legislation that comes before the Senate.

"Notably, the Senate has created a number of narrow and limited exceptions to the 60-vote cloture threshold. These include adoption of an annual budget resolution, special fiscal policy bills relating to a budget resolution, and in some cases, trade agreements. For these and other things, including Executive Branch and Judicial Branch nominees, the Senate has agreed that a simple majority is enough. I believe that a simple majority should be enough to safeguard the right to vote, the right that underpins countless other rights in our democracy. And I will consider every legislative option—including an exemption to cloture and the filibuster—to pass long-overdue voting rights protections into law."

Expand full comment

I get similar responses from one of Wisconsin's senators, the reprehensible Ron Johnson.

Expand full comment

🤢

Expand full comment

Yeah, I got a similar response awhile back when I told her I regretted contributing to her campaign and that she would never get another nickel from me.

Expand full comment

Did so yesterday regarding the red herring of “federalizing” elections.

Expand full comment

Powerful letter. they were closer to overturning the election than any of us knew. Amazing that Pence stood up to them and did do the right thing. Praying voting rights bill passes. There has to be somewhere a republican senator who is honorable. Thanks so much. The details are shocking thanks for digging and bringing them out to us

Expand full comment

Maybe Pence understood he would be the fall guy if it didn't go well. But still amazing.

Expand full comment

My wonders are of Mike Pence's take of the situation since Jan 6th.... Always careful not to accuse Trump. That to me is the chilly factor....

Expand full comment

Maybe I'm hallucinating, but I thought Pence consulted Gerald Ford who said, "Don't do it."

Expand full comment

Yes! Makes sense now. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

Lynell is right. And one of the few times that former VP Quayle did not hem and haw or “I’ll get back to you.” It was an emphatic no. And that Pence must follow and honor his duty to the Constitution, not to the former.

I can only speculate that former VP Pence felt a sense of relief and duty for finding an escape hatch from the former’s nut house.

Expand full comment

And for that, Christine, Quayle should be "pardoned" for his spelling gaffe lo these many years ago! https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/64689/never-forget-time-dan-quayle-misspelled-potato

Expand full comment

Lots of cognitive dissonance, i betcha. Those adoring looks were real

Expand full comment

Could have “contacted” Ford …

Expand full comment

Last night Rachel Maddow discussed that it would appear he knew about the forged EC votes by the additional wording he added to the traditional phrasing of announcement of the Vote Count. Here's her discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPfcI9WYZzQ

Expand full comment

Not Ford, that would be "seance-ing". He consulted former VP Dan Quayle who essentially said, "Are you nuts? You CAN'T do it."

Expand full comment

Susan, we need two senators. I am hoping! Right now that seems more plausible than SinaManchin.

Expand full comment

Exactly. It bothers me when people assume the only way to pass the bill is to convince Democratic Senators Manchin and Sinema to vote yes. The Senate has 100 senators. Fifty yes votes, not 50 Democratic votes, are needed to bring in VP Harris to cast her tie-breaking vote. An uphill battle, for sure, but another path to success is possible. Keep contacting those 16 sitting R senators who voted yes in the past. And keep pressuring Manchin and Sinema. And the corporate donors who support them. Hit them where it counts by participating in #Good Trouble Mondays (no purchasing from them on Mondays).

Expand full comment

When the wolf says “baaaa ….” You can bet it is ManSin.

Expand full comment

A republican senator who is honorable?? Nah, even Romney’s dad is flipping in his grave.

Expand full comment

It’s becoming more and more evident that Frump and his mates conspired to commit sedition through every avenue possible — and are still at it. The law is clear on the consequences for such actions. Every single person proven to be involved needs to be jailed for significant terms and never allowed to seek public office again.

There is no other option that won’t leave America vulnerable.

Expand full comment

It has been over a year since the acts of sedition or treason (call them what you wish) HCR describes have been committed, and the evidence continues to pile up. Some of the conspiracy's 'foot soldiers' have been arrested but the planners named by HCR today still roam free. For far lesser crimes, many Americans are routinely indicted and tried. WHY NOT IN THESE CASES? Because if they were arrested, indicted and put on trial, their millions of gullible and deluded supporters would turn our second civil war, already started but presently limited to words and rhetoric, to acts of violence, not unaided by the Second Amendment. And that would not be pretty.

Expand full comment

I hear you. I can’t see options. The argument that jailing the high up conspirators will only lead to an escalation of violence and rebellion, is not a reason to not do it. It will happen anyway if fRump and the infected Republicans are given tacit permission to continue by the absence of consequence.

As long as the truth and facts are no longer the base assumption of political discourse, democracy cannot survive. Democracy is a fragile pact of cooperation between citizens, and once trust has gone, the glue that makes a nation disintegrates. That is the wound that fRump has delivered, and what Is bleeding out is the festering infection of racism and white fear of true equality.

Expand full comment

I can't see the options either. The United States spent 72 years from 1789 until 1861 trying to find one to preserve that fragile pact of cooperation you mention ... and then failed. There are options, but we don't know if they will fit within the framework of democracy.

Expand full comment

I share today’s posting at Brookings on the narrowness of the prosecution of Oathkeepers for sedition taken up in yesterday's LFAA. Doesn't give much hope that we will see in used to bring justice to those higher in the food chain.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seditious-conspiracy-what-make-latest-oath-keepers-indictment?utm_campaign=Brookings%20Brief&utm_medium=email&utm_content=201122818&utm_source=hs_email#

Expand full comment

I still have faith that the higher ups will pay for their mortal sins to America. It can't/won't be easy to get this done. The prosecutors MUST have all their imaginary ducks in a row. The backlash will be brutal. There must be NO defense to their final prosecutions of treason. NO WAY OUT!

Expand full comment

Our legal system requires there be a defense for those accused of any crime.

What you mean, I suppose, is that whatever defense they offer won't amount to very much. But when you say "backlash will be brutal," what precisely do you mean?

Expand full comment

Defense of and defense for are two different things. Defense for: every person charged does have the right to defense council who can navigate the system, call witnesses, present a defense, and make sure that the prosecution does not present suppressible evidence/testimony of the rule of law. Defense of the actions undertaken by the defendant may or may not be "defensible" actions; it is why there is no requirement to testify on ones' own behalf, or why any defense at all need be presented (in the case where there is really no reasonable defense of the conduct.)

I believe that the backlash that Pam refers to is the potential reaction the conviction of these "higher ups" that will include elected officials from both houses of congress and the executive branch (and how delightful it would be to discover a SCROTUS* connection in that prosecution as well) will have on the Cult45 true believers.

*SCROTUS: Ally's profane juvenile mind referring to a container of dangly bits existing on most XY individuals rather than SCOTUS, which is forever tainted** by Mitch McConnell.

**double entendrae of "never never land" intentional

Expand full comment

I fear they will defend the indefensible with armed violence. Is that what the "brutal backlash" refers to? That is the issue around which we are dancing, avoiding mentioning it.

Expand full comment

The backlash from the trump believers. And Yes, I know there is always a defense but if they are truly ready to prosecute, the defense will look as foolish as their defense is.

Expand full comment

Yes, the legal defense will be foolish but when you say "the backlash will be brutal," does that mean armed violence? That's really the problem we are dodging. We came close on Jan. 6, 2021.

Expand full comment

Sometimes—all too often—the struggle for democracy is not pretty.

Expand full comment

Sometimes I am guilty of avoiding certain words. The struggle for democracy sometimes - all too often - is not only 'not pretty.' It can be bloody, very bloody. (1861 - 1865)

Expand full comment

Yes, thank you HCR for providing so much important information. There appears to me much evidence of criminal activity including the false electors, the one's who sent them, the legislators who played along, the planners, and others. If they are not held accountable our democracy can not survive.

Expand full comment

El Blobbo reveals his true self by approvingly quoting Joe Stalin about vote counting. And the collection of lunatics performing for the drooling morons on Saturday night showed how dangerous things are. The reporter for the Atlantic who was there called it "sinister."

As I said elsewhere today, Trump is a lifelong loser, the kid with his nose pressed to the glass who will never be invited inside. Who will always be looked down on by the ones whose approval he so desperately seeks. And that's his base - the people most other people laugh at behind their backs, the morons who think they're geniuses. They don't give a damn about policy, they just want to get back at all the people who have looked down at them, askance at them all their lives. They see Trump as one of them, and they saw this "victory" in 2016 as their victory against their betters, and then his victory was stolen from him by "those people."

Expand full comment

"As I said elsewhere today, Trump is a lifelong loser, the kid with his nose pressed to the glass who will never be invited inside. Who will always be looked down on by the ones whose approval he so desperately seeks. "

No matter how many times you say it, it's still a seriously mistaken psychobabble conceit. Trump was elected President of the United States, commands the entire apparatus of the GOP, and is considered god's vessel by many who vote. In politics you don't get more inside than that. And he is supported by a big money crew who are so far inside, they are mostly invisible to the rest of us.

Expand full comment

No, it explains what they are. And your explanation of what they can do is not in opposition to my look inside them. In fact the two analyses together show just how dangerous they are.

Expand full comment

Yes, I did notice that reference to Stalin. El Blobbo? Do you mean the biggest racist scum bag POS since George Wallace and the Confederates? That Blobbo?

Expand full comment

Dear Roland, you capture my sentiments so well with your words👆🏻!💙

Expand full comment

The Presidential Election fiasco that never ends, with the Republican winning despite losing the popular vote. Racism racism racism.

Brief history of election fraud

https://gregolear.substack.com/p/coup-it-again/comments

Expand full comment

They are....how shall I put it? Deplorable?

Expand full comment

Yes. Exactly.

We can make a value judgement on their shared behavior - Republican voter, Trump supporter - without indulging in other dubious and largely inaccurate attributions. An alarming part of the picture - as we see every day in Congress, and saw on Jan 6 - these are largely ordinary people, many with little to gain from a Republican agenda or Trump regime, and much to lose.

Expand full comment

Which is why the psychological analysis I presented is of value. These are deeply-damaged people - and they want to "get back" at those they perceive as having either done the damage or benefited from it. It's why they "vote against their own interests" because the "interests" they're voting for are psychological, not economic.

Expand full comment

As president, he finally got “inside.” Why my blood ran cold the moment that happened.

Expand full comment

It was the first moment of the nightmare.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

I am currently reading Jamin Raskin's book "Unthinkable." In it he describes how they began in MAY 2020 using Game Theory to prepare their opposition to the anticipated objections on Jan 6. They nailed it...they correctly predicted every move the Trump administration would make. From pressuring local officials to delivering false slates of electors to throw the election to the states. They were playing chess while the Trumpet Team was playing checkers. They predicted everything but the actual physical assault on the House and Senate. They didn't imagine such an event because they did not think it even possible.

These false ballots are the smoking gun. I am curious, we all assumed Barr resigned. Now I wonder if he simply was removed by Trump who announced his resignation. It is a small detail, but if Barr was informed on Dec 16 that he was resigning does this action become part of Trumps plan? It clearly tracks with his previous behavior with announcing high official resignations just because they refused to hold his highness's small peter. Is the Eastman memo similar to the one written by Rod Rosenstein to oust Comey? Did Eastman write what Miller (or Trump) asked hoping to become AG? Trump NEVER fired anyone. Steven Miller....the person who was never fired or resigned, always helping Trump...it gets curiouser and curiouser. Has he talked yet? We need to know. I think Miller/Eastman/Clark was at the heart of this...Trump does not have the knowledge to have concocted this on his own. The disgraceful Senators and Representatives don't either...they willingly, dare I say joyfully(?) advised and consented to helping perpetrate the insurrection knowing they would be rewarded with power....they would have taken over and put the last stake in the Lady Liberty's heart.

That Trump tweeted four times about the real electors on Jan 6, twice while watching and not stopping the attack, shows he knew all of this all along. How did the Senate fail to take action during two impeachments? This needs to be looked at a little closer. They all knew Trump is a snake.

Expand full comment

Failure of imagination is part of Dems problem. The fascist GOP are very creative. IMO if GOP gain the House and Senate they won't wait til '24 election to install trump. They will expedite the impeachment of Biden/Harris and install trump immediately. They will stop at nothing. Some say this idea is outrageous/ unthinkable but wasn't Jan 6th?

Expand full comment

"Failure of imagination" on the part of the opposition is how the fascists got in every time.

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

Yeh.. and herr we are. Go right back to the Mueller comedy, then the Impeachment dull outcome..and that stupid looking march with lard-ass Jerry carrying 'the scrolls'. Val Demings would've bee my pick. The whole thing coud've been used as an opportunity to openly hold the press accountable, instead they allowed the 'press' to make them look inept. I realize 'the press' works for a company which relies on advertisers, and if Faux viewership falls off.. Faux will hit the bricks. So Faux sux up to DT and viewship rockets up.

Expand full comment

You need two thirds in either the House or the Senate (I can't remember which) to impeach. That's not going to happen.

Expand full comment

I sort of agree. I don't know if it is a failure of imagination as much as a failure of imaginative cunning.

Expand full comment

It's failure of imagination - you have to believe it can happen or you can't see it happening.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

True. They imagine a better future. They do not seem able to imagine the thinking of deceitful, greedy, and evil beings. Although it makes it harder, I am glad my side draws the line at that sort of imagination...that not even Donald Trump would actually send in people to kill senators and Representatives. Trump, they thought, was only a tail rattling rattlesnake not a saber swinging desperate man. This propensity to not understand the true nature of Trump, right up to the first impeachment, is why we need a free press. They warned us, after the Ukraine incident, that he would break any law no matter what in order to be president. His decision to storm congress seemed like something out of a bad movie. I believe right will prevail. I'm willing to wait for justice to be administered. Unlike Nixon's crime, this must be answered with a trial, because just like Nixon, letting Trump walk will send a signal to the next tyrant that he shouldn't wait for an election - with Nixon Ford sent the message that Presidents was not go to trial for crimes they commit while president.The current Catch 22 we are in regarding BBB, voting, and ending the filibuster needs to be explained in the terms of fearing risk....if the Dems don't do it now...the Republicans plan to do it....and once they do...it's end of democracy and it won't matter at all. So yes, I guess they (Sinema and Manchin III) have lacked a cunning imagination...but hopefully Liz Cheney is filling the void for Nancy, Raskin, and Schiff. Keeping my fingers crossed! Was Dick Cheney only saying hello to the house on Jan 6...or maybe delivering some interesting insight or info? I've thought about that a lot.

Expand full comment

I'm still surprised that there were not more attempts of assassination during the Trump years. There are enough crazies to try to take out everyone. BTW, I am not advocating this! Just surprised that the number of shootings bypassed DC except for the shooting during a congressional baseball game.

Expand full comment

Well we might not actually know that there were no attempts...we do know there were lots of threats...and there were more threats to Obama than Trump...which tells you which side has the most crazies.

Expand full comment

It has been said here many times, many ways, but with today’s letter I have to say it one more time: THANK YOU, Heather, for so eloquently and concisely and penetratingly peeling the scales off my eyes with an alacrity I find nowhere else. You are a national treasure that history will remember kindly.

Expand full comment

Today's letter is quite a story, filling in the blanks around Pence's part, election fraud, and the cult loyalists surrounding the former guy, the inner circle with the exception of Barr, Rosen, and Pence.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Heather. You have clarified an important contrast between voter fraud and election fraud. Apparently, the republicans are bent on corrupting the minds of their base by legislating dynamic policies of election fraud. The difference must be made clear. Democrats (and any Republicans) who support the Constitution should deliver this message loud and clear across every communication option: voter fraud is not the problem. Devious election fraud is the problem. Those two phrases should appear juxtaposed beside each other on posters, billboards, news outlets, and conversations until everyone understands the difference.

Expand full comment

100%. Government is not the problem, Republicans are the problem.

Expand full comment

ABSOLUTELY. The Republican Party is the new KKK. The reason they say government is the problem: government is preventing them from re-creating the racist society they so so badly want back. No wonder Reagan was fighting the government. The government is the deep state is the force of democracy, preventing racism.

Expand full comment

The distinction is important. And, even tdfg's (the defeated former guy) supporters might be able to understand the difference. ...probably not.

Expand full comment

Cathy, I'm thinking not, as members of a cult are challenged with regard to independent thought.

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

Yes,probably not….I feel like I’m living in an alternate reality as our Florida gov declares we need an Office Of Election Crimes and Security as he frequently “campaigns” from his MAGA base at the massive Villages retirement communit where 4 ,and counting, have been arrested for voter fraud.He is soooo calculating.

Expand full comment

(and one has to wonder why he feels he needs soldiers loyal only to him...)

Expand full comment

One would think that Heather was describing a Tom Clancy book, with the proposed assassination plot coming in the next chapter.. I find it appalling and astonishing that Trump and his sycophants in the White House (Stephen Miller), the Department of Justice (Clark), and in Congress could weave such an unConstitutional web of intrigue AND ARE CONTINUING THIS SKULLDUGGERY TODAY.

What if Donahue and Rosen at DOJ and Vice President Pence had participated in this Constitutional conspiracy? Were we on the edge of a coup d’etat? Some of the Trumpamania scum buckets are still, to use a Churchillian phrase, working their wicked ways. The Republicans have nominated Secretaries of State in number Republican-controlled states who are empowered to determine the validity of Electoral College votes. Indeed, in several states, the Republican legislature could validate the state’s Electoral College vote.

At a time when we are debating the need for above-board voting nationally, Republican are establishing a political mechanism where the valid Electoral College presidential vote in key states could be overturned by a local Secretary of State and/or a Republican legislature. I fear, in more than half a dozen states, that, perhaps, this electoral horse is already out of the barn. It should be a principal up-front issue in the 2022 and 2024 elections..

Expand full comment

It should be. I tried engaging with a "friend" from the "other side" who was trumpeting this override provision as "needed". I asked how he would feel if that were the case in Oregon, and our Sec State (a Democrat) decided that a close Republican victory could be overturned. He sputtered, threw straw men and false equivalencies at me, and changed the subject.

Expand full comment

That's what happens when people embrace and live a lie. Rational thinking goes out the window. Relatives I love, people who otherwise have sterling qualities, are ensnared in this web. It creates an emotional chasm between family members that feels unbridgeable.

Expand full comment

All the more reason we need to have Congress pass the consolidated voting rights bill. If they do not, the Republicans will continue their brazen moves to discourage voters from casting their ballots, and our democracy will be truly doomed. For the life of me, I cannot fathom how almost all Republicans have lost their consciences and are putting their own personal interests to retain power above their love of country.

Expand full comment

For the life of me I cannot imagine self-interested Republicans wanting another actual Trump presidency. Trump coattails, sure, but they know what he is like. Mentally ill, amoral, incompetent, more of a danger to the country than ever, he would lash out at whoever raises an eyebrow when he suggests the governmental equivalent of drinking bleach.

Expand full comment

Carol “Mentally ill, amoral, incompetent”—does that describe Trump and/or ‘self-interested Republicans’ such as Cruz and DeSantis who yearn to succeed him? I am told [from The Honeymooners] that it is difficult to clearly identify the big chunks in a sewer.

Expand full comment

Jim I agree that a watered-down voting rights bill is better than nothing.The Democrats in Congress and the Little Engine that kept saying “I think I can, I think I can” at one time had much in common. Now I keep hearing from Congress “I think I can’t.” Sad for our country.

Expand full comment

From one side of the aisle, it's more "I know I won't," Keith.

Expand full comment

I will always be grateful for the police that fought on 1/6 with their lives and wits that day. They are the only reason it was horrifying but not a disaster.

Expand full comment

Absolutely! As to the codification of election fraud by a number of Republican legislatures, you'd think they would realize that this could work against them should another party gain control. Unless, of course, they feel secure they can quickly establish power and use these undemocratic "laws" to maintain that power perpetually.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

I note the important distinction between election fraud (the accusation) and voting fraud (the strategy in play)

I share today’s posting at Brookings on the narrowness of the prosecution of Oathkeepers for sedition taken up in yesterday's LFAA. Doesn't give much hope that we will see in used to bring justice to those higher in the food chain.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seditious-conspiracy-what-make-latest-oath-keepers-indictment?utm_campaign=Brookings%20Brief&utm_medium=email&utm_content=201122818&utm_source=hs_email#

Expand full comment

"Miraculously, the plan failed, but Trump loyalists have been working ever since to make sure a repeat will not fail, passing new laws to suppress Democratic voters and take the counting of electoral votes out of the hands of nonpartisan officials and give it to Trump supporters."

"Miraculously," indeed, Heather! Their deception almost succeeded! I can't even begin to think of another four years with tfg! Surely, the DOJ must have enough evidence with all this information out there. It blows the mind that this group of malefactors and scofflaws have not been arrested to date!

"Voter fraud in America is vanishingly rare and has not affected the outcome of elections, and it is almost always prosecuted. But Trump loyalists used cries of voter fraud as an excuse to commit election fraud. Whether they will be prosecuted for it is an open question."

And a critical one, Heather. How can it not be? Each and every one of these nefarious and depraved scoundrels, knew exactly what they were doing and were willing to do so with ne'er a care and no sense of conscience. Was it tfg who brought the evil out in them, or were they just plain wicked and vile human beings hungry for the opportunity to commit any transgression or abomination beckoning them? A little of both, possibly?

Thank you, Heather, for your informative columns which never cease to amaze and to necessitate more rumination and thought.

Expand full comment

"It blows the mind that this group of malefactors and scofflaws have not been arrested to date!"

I am not even slightly surprised. Think hard: When was the last time a fat, white, rich, male was tossed into jail? (not including Jeffrey Epstein, who, was released from jail in 2003 by the Bush Justice Department)

Expand full comment

I know that it shouldn't surprise me in the least, but it still leaves me absolutely gobsmacked.

Expand full comment

Excellent point and analysis, Heather! The MAGAhats' complaining about 'voter fraud' is a false flag and a red herring. The real crime is election fraud committed by state election officials whose scaremongering has gotten the Trump base all riled up over election law violations that are virtually nonexistent. The real problem here is that the Supreme Court has turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to what is really going on. That's happened before in American history, but never on the scale that the radicals have been employing over the past 20-odd years. Unlike voter fraud, where the offenders are typically misguided individuals, the commission of election fraud is inherently the result of a criminal conspiracy, because no one person is able to manipulate governmental election machinery all by themselves.

As for the legislation currently pending before Congress, it looks as if President Biden and Majority Leader Schumer are going to force the two Democratic holdouts, Senators Manchin and Sinema, to actually cast a vote against their party's core interests. We saw the flipside of that when John McCain voted against repealing the Affordable Care Act. I can see Joe Manchin making a calculated bet that his career as a working senator is effectively over now that he's burned all his bridges behind him with the Democrats. I haven't figured out how Kyrsten Sinema came to the conclusion that the Senate's 60-vote minimum requirement to even debate the pending voter rights legislation is too sacrosanct to be adjusted to protect the right to vote. This was a procedural rule adopted by southern white supremacists in order to protect their political and social positions in the former Confederacy. Here's a woman with an MSW degree and PhD in social work, who also has a law degree. Nothing to sneeze at; and yet, here she is, breaking bread with fifty recalcitrant Republican senators with whom she apparently has little or nothing in common. I suspect, however, that we haven't examined Kyrsten Sinema close enough to find a loose thread that, when pulled, will unravel the invisibility cloak that she has cast over herself. There is a reason why she is doing this, it's just that the answer is hidden from view, because nobody has taken the trouble to do the deep down digging that's going to be required. So, if she does walk away from the Democrats, what's her payoff? Sinema's career as a state representative and State Senator, and three terms as a Member of the House of Representatives, all as a Democrat, would seem to be the antithesis of the behavior she is exhibiting now. Even a 'blue dog Democrat' would understand that nothing gets done in Congress without compromise and persuasion, giving up a little, to get something worthwhile back in return.

I don't think for a moment that anyone believes the rationale she offered for her opposition to changing the filibuster rule; it doesn't make sense when 48 of her Democratic colleagues have stepped forward to allow a simple majority of Senators present and voting to carry the day on any legislative measure under consideration. Given the stakes involved, there has to be a monster-sized interest involved that is causing Sinema to hold back.

I also agree with those who argue that the real problem is that the national Democrats are too wedded to a Washington solution, with its one-size-fits-all solutions to our country's perennial problems in achieving voting equity. It may be too late to do anything about that. My email inbox is overflowing with appeals from apoplectic Democratic-leaning advocacy groups begging for money. As the late California politician Jesse Unruh once said, "Money is the mother's milk of politics." That was sixty years ago, and since then politics have been monetized to an exponential degree. In this upcoming election, and in 2024, I think what is going to count is the passion of voters to preserve whatever democratic form of government we have left. If the passion is there the money will flow to the right places.

Expand full comment

They are doing what Trojan Horses do, no reason is good enough for betrayal

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022·edited Jan 18, 2022

TFG convinced dozens maybe 100’s of underlings from almost every red corner, to commit numerous acts of fraud through many small and large acts, behaviors, & state forgeries, integral team of teams and solo assignment’s, some siloed off, others in the know, it’s like an complex and layered Ocean Eleven like con job, with an all out fail safe …( have the Supreme Court to decide) to steal a presidential election. That this development materialized on MLK day, the irony is almost too much.

Expand full comment

Thanks, HCR, for making it increasingly clear how election fraud was conceived and executed, and how it failed. To some degree, forewarned is forearmed and all eyes will be focused on the electoral process in the coming presidential election, as well as conduct during the the mid-terms in swing states. However, laying 2020's crimes completely bare and prosecuting the perps may go a long way towards constraining elected state officials in upcoming elections. Not everyone has the stomach to withstand investigations and prosecution for election fraud. Precisely who was it in several states that manufactured fake electoral votes? At whose direction? Who dreamed up the scheme in the first place? In the hours and days before 1/6/21, TFG reiterated over and over that "Pence needs to do the right thing, needs to have the courage, etc. etc.", so he obviously understood the architecture of the planned electoral fraud prior that date. It's ironic that his persistent claims of massive fraud are turning out to be true, only the actual fraudulent activity being uncovered is not what the voters intended, but what their party and elected officials attempted to do instead. While a corrupt and spineless senate couldn't impeach him for attempting to interfere with the Georgia vote, perhaps a federal grand jury will be willing to indict him and the Atty General will have the courage to prosecute him for his role in the attempt to defraud the American electorate? One can hope...

Expand full comment