BTW, I recall some comments from Democrats that Gore in the Gore VS W race, seemed "stiff"? What does that mean? I think just before or just after (sorry for my imprecision) W's reelection. I saw a poll that listed "issues" that those polled scored pertaining to Bush. He was below 50% on every substantive issue, but very high on "decisiv…
BTW, I recall some comments from Democrats that Gore in the Gore VS W race, seemed "stiff"? What does that mean? I think just before or just after (sorry for my imprecision) W's reelection. I saw a poll that listed "issues" that those polled scored pertaining to Bush. He was below 50% on every substantive issue, but very high on "decisiveness". So his decisions were uniformly terrible, but you like his "derisiveness"?! Should we not look before we leap?
Look at any dialogue on a FB site cheerleading for either of the two parties. Cross out the blaming and fingerpointing at "the other" party, talk of spoilers and media bias, and you'll be left with a list of issues and focus on governance. I'll guarantee that what you will be left with is a very short read.
BTW, I recall some comments from Democrats that Gore in the Gore VS W race, seemed "stiff"? What does that mean? I think just before or just after (sorry for my imprecision) W's reelection. I saw a poll that listed "issues" that those polled scored pertaining to Bush. He was below 50% on every substantive issue, but very high on "decisiveness". So his decisions were uniformly terrible, but you like his "derisiveness"?! Should we not look before we leap?
Look at any dialogue on a FB site cheerleading for either of the two parties. Cross out the blaming and fingerpointing at "the other" party, talk of spoilers and media bias, and you'll be left with a list of issues and focus on governance. I'll guarantee that what you will be left with is a very short read.