CGW, As DT.s behavior and speech deteriorate, I can only hope that whatever is motivating the pundits and press who engage in "sanewashing" - an excellent descriptive, by the way, will become less and less attractive to them. How can people who's lively hoods depend on robust first amendment rights support (tacitly or otherwise) someone …
CGW, As DT.s behavior and speech deteriorate, I can only hope that whatever is motivating the pundits and press who engage in "sanewashing" - an excellent descriptive, by the way, will become less and less attractive to them. How can people who's lively hoods depend on robust first amendment rights support (tacitly or otherwise) someone who clearly wants to destroy them? "Sane" is not a term I would use here. Yet it is exactly what's going on. Thanks for the concept and descriptive CGW!
CGW, As DT.s behavior and speech deteriorate, I can only hope that whatever is motivating the pundits and press who engage in "sanewashing" - an excellent descriptive, by the way, will become less and less attractive to them. How can people who's lively hoods depend on robust first amendment rights support (tacitly or otherwise) someone who clearly wants to destroy them? "Sane" is not a term I would use here. Yet it is exactly what's going on. Thanks for the concept and descriptive CGW!
Actually, “Sanewashing” was coined by journalist Aaron Rupar.
CGW acknowledges that in the comment he made in the link to the comment that he made.
Ally; you are right about that. I opened the link and saw it was attributed to Aaron Rupar after I posted my reply to Steve Abbott.
INSANEwashing is more like what’s happening.