I don’t believe there is a they, a “progressives”. I am not afraid of saying that I am a progressive or I am progressive, meaning in my views. That does not mean I belong to some coherent group or party. Nor does it mean I am “far left” or agree with those that are being so called. It’s all about putting people in baskets that don’t help…
I don’t believe there is a they, a “progressives”. I am not afraid of saying that I am a progressive or I am progressive, meaning in my views. That does not mean I belong to some coherent group or party. Nor does it mean I am “far left” or agree with those that are being so called. It’s all about putting people in baskets that don’t help, that instead may or do divide. By and large the far left and progressives in general have been pragmatic because of the danger of Trump. Maybe I am wrong or will be if they continue to oppose Biden.
I don't agree with you in terms of what I term far left. They did aid and abet the election of death star. Locally they continued to diss Biden despite what he was doing in terms of being inclusive in his appointments and standing up for ordinary American. When people are at the extreme end of the political spectrum, they actually are very much the same in terms of not finding a compromise that could move us forward. So now no Roe. And who knows what this court will do in terms of fair and equal treatment and the environment, etc. In fact, despite warnings about Supreme Court selections in 2016, they dissed HRC, and then they either didn't vote for voted for Jill not green Stein. And I will put those people in extremist baskets because that's where they are just as some people are in the MAGA basket I am not afraid to say that I have progressive views either. I vote for Ds because they are the only option. Anyone else only helps Rs and they are off the rails for the most part. I think we have had this discussion before and I am not going to change my mind or apologize for placing certain people along the political spectrum.
There are absolute priorities, but it is essential that we not permit ourselves to be sidelined by appearances like the presence of one representing the deepest Green values into unintentionally enabling the greatest universal harm possible: the election of that bumbling gone-to-seed lunatic, frontman for national suicide.
You are putting the extreme right and the extreme left in the same basket and that is unfair and wrong. They are not the same. The extreme left if such an organized group exists, is nowhere near the very organized extreme right in organization and tactics.
I don't know who you or anyone term or label the far left. It's nebulous and amorphous. And it's a convenient way to blame.
Moving us forward is what the left has been doing basically. The "left" is a much larger group than the "extreme left". Whatever, folks are idealistic about where we should be going, and often it's not realistic. To the point of voting for a spoiler in the election, I agree, that is very harmful. Nevertheless we need to aim our vision high.
The non-compromising sort, I agree, do harm. But I strongly disagree with the nebulous and amorphous characterization.
Sometimes you need the extreme to hold the line as well. Compromisers have done harm too. This country has been moving slowly ever more right because the Democrats compromise and the Republicans propagandize threaten and hold hostage. Obama was a centrist and seen as weak especially after his talk of being "bold and audacious". Clinton "triangulated", moved to the right.
Insofar as we have no Roe ( which was a compromise to begin with!!!) whose fault is that as you are blaming? Whose fault is this SCOTUS? Who did not fight hard enough? The Republicans all became radical right and partisan, while the Democrats remained compromisers centrists, left and far left to democratic socialists ( Bernie Sanders). Sanders had a lot of support, including mine.
Your opinion, not mine. They have the same mind set of no compromise and that's what I'm talking about. I am not calling all people on the left extreme. I could give you some local examples, but they would not mean anything to you. For Roe I am blaming the Supreme Court and Mitch who would bring Garland forward and then we got death star who chose three unworthy people and made it easy to get the votes to end Roe. If you want to lose an election, call yourself a socialist even though people do not understand it. I never supported Bernie and I saw some of his local supporters try to pull a fast one at the local D county meeting. I felt sorry for the poos gal who was their candidate while they would run things. Then they insulted a very good person, long time activist D, by implying she would not count the votes accurately. They went down big time, btw. Frankly, they were two very loud egos. I would been OK with Bernie, but the behavior of some of his supporters turned me off. I am not a Bill Clinton fan either. I am well aware of the shortcoming of recent D presidents and they are still better than death star. I know what you think and we disagree. End of conversation as far as I am concerned.
I have a big problem with your "they". "They" this and "they" that. "They" have compromised!
This is not a coherent organized group. It's a political point of view, a constellation of views, that some on the far left share in part. I would say many people would say they agree about progressive policies. Some people are afraid to call themselves progressive because the Right has made it a pejorative... and maybe too some on the Left. But the Left understands tolerates and respects progressives who are also tolerant and practical MOSTLY when push comes to shove lately. The days of Nader, of spoilers, are gone. Hopefully RFK,Jr.is not worth bothering about. There are "off" people, voters and wannabe leaders in every party
I remember that Sanders supporters incident. You remember the bad stuff well and carry it on. That was an isolated incident I believe. Sanders had energized support.
*Even Trump's supporters come in all shades. I am sorry but your use of 'death star' is not cute.
All those cute names the other immature political side uses are no no better on this side:
from Tom Nichols - The Atlantic
"But the prodemocracy movement must fight with the confidence and maturity of adults:
Ditch all the coy, immature, and too-precious language about former President Donald Trump and the Republicans. No more GQP, no more Qevin McCarthy, no more Rethuglicans and Repuglicans. No more Drumpf. No more Orange Menace … Be the adult alternative to the bedlam around you."
Juvenile nicknames too easily blur the distinction between prodemocracy voters and the people they’re trying to defeat. If you’ve ever had to endure friends or family who parrot Fox-popular terms like Demonrats and Killary and other such nonsense, think for a moment how they instantly communicated to you that you never had to take them seriously again.
I don’t believe there is a they, a “progressives”. I am not afraid of saying that I am a progressive or I am progressive, meaning in my views. That does not mean I belong to some coherent group or party. Nor does it mean I am “far left” or agree with those that are being so called. It’s all about putting people in baskets that don’t help, that instead may or do divide. By and large the far left and progressives in general have been pragmatic because of the danger of Trump. Maybe I am wrong or will be if they continue to oppose Biden.
I don't agree with you in terms of what I term far left. They did aid and abet the election of death star. Locally they continued to diss Biden despite what he was doing in terms of being inclusive in his appointments and standing up for ordinary American. When people are at the extreme end of the political spectrum, they actually are very much the same in terms of not finding a compromise that could move us forward. So now no Roe. And who knows what this court will do in terms of fair and equal treatment and the environment, etc. In fact, despite warnings about Supreme Court selections in 2016, they dissed HRC, and then they either didn't vote for voted for Jill not green Stein. And I will put those people in extremist baskets because that's where they are just as some people are in the MAGA basket I am not afraid to say that I have progressive views either. I vote for Ds because they are the only option. Anyone else only helps Rs and they are off the rails for the most part. I think we have had this discussion before and I am not going to change my mind or apologize for placing certain people along the political spectrum.
There are absolute priorities, but it is essential that we not permit ourselves to be sidelined by appearances like the presence of one representing the deepest Green values into unintentionally enabling the greatest universal harm possible: the election of that bumbling gone-to-seed lunatic, frontman for national suicide.
Agreed.
You are putting the extreme right and the extreme left in the same basket and that is unfair and wrong. They are not the same. The extreme left if such an organized group exists, is nowhere near the very organized extreme right in organization and tactics.
I don't know who you or anyone term or label the far left. It's nebulous and amorphous. And it's a convenient way to blame.
Moving us forward is what the left has been doing basically. The "left" is a much larger group than the "extreme left". Whatever, folks are idealistic about where we should be going, and often it's not realistic. To the point of voting for a spoiler in the election, I agree, that is very harmful. Nevertheless we need to aim our vision high.
The non-compromising sort, I agree, do harm. But I strongly disagree with the nebulous and amorphous characterization.
Sometimes you need the extreme to hold the line as well. Compromisers have done harm too. This country has been moving slowly ever more right because the Democrats compromise and the Republicans propagandize threaten and hold hostage. Obama was a centrist and seen as weak especially after his talk of being "bold and audacious". Clinton "triangulated", moved to the right.
Insofar as we have no Roe ( which was a compromise to begin with!!!) whose fault is that as you are blaming? Whose fault is this SCOTUS? Who did not fight hard enough? The Republicans all became radical right and partisan, while the Democrats remained compromisers centrists, left and far left to democratic socialists ( Bernie Sanders). Sanders had a lot of support, including mine.
Your opinion, not mine. They have the same mind set of no compromise and that's what I'm talking about. I am not calling all people on the left extreme. I could give you some local examples, but they would not mean anything to you. For Roe I am blaming the Supreme Court and Mitch who would bring Garland forward and then we got death star who chose three unworthy people and made it easy to get the votes to end Roe. If you want to lose an election, call yourself a socialist even though people do not understand it. I never supported Bernie and I saw some of his local supporters try to pull a fast one at the local D county meeting. I felt sorry for the poos gal who was their candidate while they would run things. Then they insulted a very good person, long time activist D, by implying she would not count the votes accurately. They went down big time, btw. Frankly, they were two very loud egos. I would been OK with Bernie, but the behavior of some of his supporters turned me off. I am not a Bill Clinton fan either. I am well aware of the shortcoming of recent D presidents and they are still better than death star. I know what you think and we disagree. End of conversation as far as I am concerned.
I have a big problem with your "they". "They" this and "they" that. "They" have compromised!
This is not a coherent organized group. It's a political point of view, a constellation of views, that some on the far left share in part. I would say many people would say they agree about progressive policies. Some people are afraid to call themselves progressive because the Right has made it a pejorative... and maybe too some on the Left. But the Left understands tolerates and respects progressives who are also tolerant and practical MOSTLY when push comes to shove lately. The days of Nader, of spoilers, are gone. Hopefully RFK,Jr.is not worth bothering about. There are "off" people, voters and wannabe leaders in every party
I remember that Sanders supporters incident. You remember the bad stuff well and carry it on. That was an isolated incident I believe. Sanders had energized support.
*Even Trump's supporters come in all shades. I am sorry but your use of 'death star' is not cute.
All those cute names the other immature political side uses are no no better on this side:
from Tom Nichols - The Atlantic
"But the prodemocracy movement must fight with the confidence and maturity of adults:
Ditch all the coy, immature, and too-precious language about former President Donald Trump and the Republicans. No more GQP, no more Qevin McCarthy, no more Rethuglicans and Repuglicans. No more Drumpf. No more Orange Menace … Be the adult alternative to the bedlam around you."
Juvenile nicknames too easily blur the distinction between prodemocracy voters and the people they’re trying to defeat. If you’ve ever had to endure friends or family who parrot Fox-popular terms like Demonrats and Killary and other such nonsense, think for a moment how they instantly communicated to you that you never had to take them seriously again.