424 Comments

As a woman, who worked a non-traditional, male-dominated trade - for my whole adult career - I applaud this message ❤️. I retired out of the IUOE (Operating Engineers Union. Born & raised in a Union family (my dad was a Pipe Fitter. Thank you Dr. Richardson. ❤️

Expand full comment

As a life-long educator, I wish more of us would understand that we are an integral part of the world of labor. I am also part of a generations-long line of union members, beginning with my grandfather who started out life in the U.S. as a garment worker. My parents were both in educators' unions (my mother was a rep in Al Shanker's UFT and AFT), and I was one of two contingent faculty members on the Massachusetts Community College Council Board of Directors, a local of the Massachusetts Teachers' Association and the National Education Association.

Expand full comment

Thank you Betsy. We owe so much to the unions - 8 hour work day, 5 day work week, pensions, paid time off, etc. Each benefit gained was a hard fought battle usually by thousands of people and opposed by oligarchs and business owners.

Expand full comment

Great medical coverage through MPI (Motion Picuture Industry- Union).

Expand full comment

Nickie, yes, being raised in a union family makes a difference in one's outlook. I did and know that it was the union that enabled our family to do better than survive. My dad was a supermarket clerk for 35 years, Retail Clerks union and my mother a school district secretary for 26 years in the non-professional branch of the PSEA (I can't remember the exact name of that union). Solidarity forever!

Expand full comment

Nickie, I salute you as both a Union member and as a woman in a non-trad, male dominated profession (I was a cop). Our Union did as much for us in working conditions/wages as they did in preventing management shenanigans, and really kept us strong when management would try bifurcation (separating corrections and police assignments) or other "streamlining" efforts designed to create a caste system (per se) within the ranks.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your dignity, Nickie; enjoy this day properly dedicated to the Nickies who built the republic. Written elsewhere.

====

President Lincoln's letter to the workers of Manchester, U.K., dated 19jan1863.

https://acws.co.uk/archives-misc-lincoln_letter

"I know and deeply deplore the sufferings which the working-men . . . are called to endure in this crisis [i.e., the Great Civil War of 1861-65] . . . [T]he attempt to overthrow this government, which was built upon the foundation of human rights, and to substitute for it one which should rest exclusively on the basis of human slavery, was likely to obtain the favor of Europe . . . . Under the circumstances, I cannot but regard your decisive utterances [in favor of the Union] upon the question as an instance of sublime Christian heroism . . . ."

Expand full comment

Please please please let it be pitchfork time.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, character is essential for that job, the job of running the most complicated country in the world, made complex by our innerconnections as a democracy, and much more so by our connections with the rest of the world. The obvious fact we have all lived through is that Trump does not understand how government actually works other than in his favor where he can manipulate it for his own profit, the power of it being the great attraction. And power must be tempered by character as well as knowledge, knowledge he does not possess which should be obvious to anyone who completed high school civics and social studies, if indeed they were paying attention. This next few weeks and following that could be an amazing civics lesson for the whole country, not to mention the world. The cult of personality simply does not qualify someone to understand and guide such a complicated business as all the parts and components, the departments including the State Department, where you have to have a good grasp of their essential nature and impact, even though you're not directly running them, where you just don't bark out orders that come out of a relatively empty head, and besides that he's lazy. It takes a lot of study and experience and he so plainly does not have it. Am I speaking to the choir here I hope? But maybe the choir has to sing a little louder…

Expand full comment

How did we allow his family into office with him?

Expand full comment

Bullied and nobody stood up. Bullies run amok if nobody says no. Ye hear that SC.

Expand full comment

Exactly so. Federal law, at 5 U.S.C. § 3110 clearly states that no "relative" may be appointed to a seat in the federal government: nor a "civilian agency". The appointments of Ivanka and Jared were clearly against the law and no one in government stepped up to object to it. We know what that produced: Ivanka hawking her merchandise on the White House website to Jared's personal gains from Saudi officials. This is what becomes of all of us when criminals like the Trump organization seeps creepily into the nation's leadership cadre.

Expand full comment

The true crime family is the tRump family, not the Biden family.

Expand full comment

Where were the Dems we elected into office who should have been watching and fighting back?

Both Sen and House were Republican during 115th Congress.

Ooops- no one was in charge- Mitch McConnell was running the show.

Expand full comment

I kept waiting for somebody to say “enough” but on they charged. The bull in the China shop raged on, left a horrible path of destruction, and wants to finish us off. Or maybe he just wants to turn us over to Vlad, only slightly mangled.

Expand full comment

And where was the DOJ in all of that? Politicized by thump.

Merrick Garland COULD have prosecuted after the fact but, as he did with most other crimes, ignored the these.

Expand full comment

I wonder whether that statute covers "personal advisors" to the president. Just another loophole for the Trumps to exploit. Did those advisor position also preclude them from having to pass a national security check?

Expand full comment

I do remember a statement printed them not being able to pass ( or even ‘ given’) security checks …correct? But…THEY GET AWAY WITH IT, again and again, and again…………

Expand full comment

Really !!

Expand full comment

How.... in the name of providence did the once respectable gop allow that to occur ?

Expand full comment

The election WAS stolen, by you know whom.

Expand full comment

And remember to stagger breathe so the choir stays strong when one or two members need to pause for breath.

I hope this choir has room for a bass accompaniment. I don't sing well, but lay down a mean bass line on the tuba!

Expand full comment

I’m a lady who sings baritone!

Expand full comment

lol...

Expand full comment

And so history repeats itself...

I think you are singing to the choir Robin,, but we need every voice to hear each and every evil celebrated by MAGA and Christian Nationalist and refute them.

Expand full comment

Sing what song, Robin?

Something from "Les Miserables"? Or from what the Molly McGuires sang? Bob Seger's "Feel Like a Number"? "For What It's Worth"?

Expand full comment

My vote is for"Sooner or Later", by Eliza Gilkyson, but the old Pete Seeger & Woody Guthrie favorites still hold up.

Expand full comment

We can also sing the songs “Ain’t No Stopping Us Now” -“we’re on the move” by McFadden and Whitehead and “We Who Believe in Freedom Cannot Rest”-until

It’s done by Sweet Honey in the Rock.

The lyrics and melodies to both of these songs don’t allow for “negative vibes” and inspire us to keep moving forward. Search for them on YouTube and enjoy as the beat goes on.

Expand full comment

My vote is for "This land is your land..."

Expand full comment

From California to the New York Island. Sea to shining sea.

Expand full comment

Which Side are You On Boys

Expand full comment

If I recall correctly, Trump spent some of each day playing golf rather than attending to the Affairs of State. It has been such a radical change that I would appreciate confirmation.

Expand full comment

"sing a little louder"... Tim has made use of that lately, I believe.

Expand full comment

The choir needs to be knocking on doors and registering voters in swing states while they sing.

Expand full comment

Choir member here.

High school civics is a good start, but I'd argue that we can and must immunize children against the authoritarian impulse before granting them an elementary school graduation certificate. All that has to happen is that the teacher must verify that every individual child is treating every other child the way the individual would want to be treated if the shoe was on the other foot. That's the easy part. The hard part is teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic.

Expand full comment

Yes Robin: You are speaking to the choir here; Never forget that. Opposition research is conducted here ongoing. Our good doctor has made a target of herself. Recently, for whatever reason, "Wired" magazine online, recently 'outed' HCR as a significant 2024 election 'influencer.' It should be noted that "Wired" is a Conde Nast publication. See > https://www.wired.com/story/visual-guide-to-influencers-shaping-2024-election/

Expand full comment

"The recognition of and affirmation of your character are revealed every time you vote for a candidate that shares your ideals. This should be the case, but how can anyone associate their ideals with a candidate that has so many flaws that it takes a contortionist to justify them all. "

Not even-euclidean geometries can rationalize the tangled web of MAGA. Anything attempting justification becomes so twisted in such spaces that it can no more than reflect and extend the shameless tangle of lies.

Expand full comment

How, we wonder, can anyone vote for such a deeply flawed individual? Two professors at the Univ. of Kansas also wondered, researched it and published it in the peer-reviewed journal, Critical Sociology, in Feb. 2018, entitled "The Anger Games: Who Voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 Election and Why?" Google it. Their conclusion: racism, xenophobia, homophobia and misogyny. To that I think that we can add white Protestant nationalism, garnering more support from the white evangelicals, you know, the Chinos.

Expand full comment

I keep sayin' in their guts, they know he's nuts.

MAGAT grandmas for Kamela. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crMe-O10j9g

Republican voters against Trump. https://rvat.org/

Evangelicals for Harris. https://www.evangelicalsforharris.com/

Expand full comment

more of that, the better and merrier!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

We can do it by ourselves --- if we register more. https://newrepublic.com/article/185354/bad-news-trump-surprise-data-shows-pro-kamala-surge-new-voters

That said, I'm concerned about Pa.

Can't rely on Republicans. We also need the down ballot.

Expand full comment

Afraid so.... as a lowly Canadian in a small province just east of Maine, I repeatedly shake my head at Trump's and MAGA's appeal.

Expand full comment

But also because he spoke to people in ways they could relate to. All lies, mind you, but people still related. His communication skills have deteriorated, but now many are entrenched.

Reading "Dirt Road Revival" and recommend it to all on how to communicate to the (rural) disenfranchised.

Expand full comment

Have you read "Elmer Gantry"?

Expand full comment

Not (higher case) Presbyterian voters, thank you. Evangelical protestants, please. We aren’t all part of a broad brush.

Expand full comment

Richard, All those words to express hatred of the most vulnerable…. Are there words to express hatred of the most powerful? The richest? I could use some of those words right now.

Expand full comment

Richard, they got it right. What a disgrace.

Expand full comment

Richard, exactly....the MAGAs are just like death star.

Expand full comment

Euclidean geometries… 😂 I just love that….

Expand full comment

Thanks for that reiteration of the obvious. It needs to be blasted from every outlet. I, too, am gobsmacked that any truly believe that he is competent and capable. He just hates the same people that Rupert says they must hate. The motives are selfish and geared to power of the greedy. A triple threat we are, and gaining ground

Expand full comment

Is not the sleight of hand …the magicians forte..smoke screens and mirrors …

Expand full comment

Richard Rodgers wrote it all in "South Pacific": "You've got to be carefully taught."

Expand full comment

Yep, got those lyrics somewhere in my photos.

Expand full comment

"The list is incomplete but so overwhelming it leaves you speechless that so many of our fellow citizens could tolerate so many flaws in one human being."

Thank you Hoyt. Many books have been written about Trump's character flaws but until the votes are counted we must keep fighting to defeat EVERY Republican running for office.

Expand full comment

Enough to get effective majorities will suit me. Republicans have a huge hold on the American electorate, with a well established political infrastructure.

Expand full comment

Exactly. That’s the playbook synapse , followed methodically. Remember ..’we won’t make that mistake again’? Each election process teaches them what wasn’t done , or could be done better. This is , as we all know, been happening since before …the ark was built? Humor 101

I gave up trying to understand it, because the principle -or lack thereof-stood constant. I don’t watch ‘them’ , Fox, and now the long litany of the corporate media , heard enough -the repetition is just someone else’s name ..or new ‘nickname ‘ oh, and the lies. I wrote the list starting with the first impeachment.. 147 of them. Some have been highlighted (getting doubled down on to coin the phrase😏) as ‘worser’ was noted (now expected ) .

Reiterating ..the playbook has been followed and as is pointed to frequently , already being used in states like Fla.,Tx, school boards ,SC, legislators …firmly entrenched.

And to make the point…perfectly clear, this 2024 election is OUR LAST CHANCE. “..you won’t have to vote again”..

even to the point of making ‘woke’ a ‘bad’ word …

It’s 🗣️WTFU or forever hold your peace …as another thing of the past .

💙💙VOTE BLUE END THE COUP💙💙

Expand full comment

I don't know the truth of all that, but for sure Dem majorities are absolutely necessary for meaningful change. Despite how enthusiastic this group is, political allegiance is tribal, pretty much. I endlessly shake my head how Trump's Stop the Steal has been so effective and so lasting.

Expand full comment

It is fascinating , so many succumb to cult figures, personalities, and sense of community..hmmm🤔

Expand full comment

The resurgence in pro-union sentiment is definitely a sign of greater awareness of wealth inequality, and it seems the current administration has made notable outreach. Just remember though that unionization in the past couple generations has slid to an all time low, from about 40% half a century ago to about 10% now. I don't think there needs to be anything resembling "all out war" but a large union presence might well serve as a needed counter to the dominance of corporations over the labour force at large.

Expand full comment

Out of 36 countries in the OECD, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_comparisons_of_trade_unions

The US was in 31st place out of 36 with 10.1%,

less than half the average of 24.4%

Sweden had 68%

My Capitalist Conservative friends back around 2016 were telling me what a success it was after they got rid of their excessively liberal policies. As I looked at it, Sweden had the highest per capita number of billionaires, the second highest percentage of Union members (behind only Iceland), and the happiest people.

To me a large part of that happiness was the more cooperative, non-confrontational attitudes of unions and employers

Expand full comment

Wonderful. You articulate what is my heart and mind as well.

Reading Dr Richardson’s letter this morning made me think about many personal memories. People I have known, worked with and respected and those who like trump would do anything to get ahead. It always perplexed me as to why many of senior execs I knew were so anti union. They were terrified of them and spoke derisively about them because the unions threatened their control and supreme authority. They were characterized as corrupted and easily made the tools of demagogues seeking greater power over the people who actually led the way toward greater prosperity….. mostly for themselves, first. I perceived unions as something archaic to be avoided since they only wanted power and money for themselves and cared little for those they represented. It is true that the mafia infiltrated many of the unions decades ago and still maintains influence and perverse involvement that results in higher costs for everyone. The ideal situation is no unions…. I heard said. By the 1970s when I entered the workforce Jimmy Hoffa and his Teamsters were in league with Nixon and his ilk and proudly calling for Viet Nam war protesters to “ Love, or Leave” our country. The construction workers physically attacked Viet Nam war protesters when they marched on Wall St to underscore corporate complicity in that awful and unjust war.

Little did i know about the work of FDR and Frances Perkins or the brave people who were part of the first Labor Day. That is because we live the life we know and mine was not to be a union member. My only experience with unions wasn’t a positive one; i was charged $25 to join the supermarkets clerks union when i was a checker in a local grocery store diving High School. The manager had seen to it that i worked a 10 hour shift one Saturday because they were busy. My paycheck was about $6 for that day of work. I felt cheated and exploited so i didn’t care about the job and soon quit.

The idea that we should be able to keep the money we earn is a very compelling one. Unions seemed to create a false sense of security for the members and cost them money, too! And so the deemphasis of the labor movement continued and is still seen by many as a relic of a time when people didn’t have the rule of law to help them with their employment grievances or inequities. Unions can be helpful when they’re honestly operated and led but i don’t think most are that way. In our current era unions that are honestly led and operated should be better understood. Perhaps the UAW under Sean Fain is…. I don’t know. The Teamsters seem to still identify with their natural enemy the Republicans…. I thought their leader was coddling trump, of all people! This of course echoes their undying support for Nixon…. and the Mafia.

The American labor movement needs to change its ways and then the perception of their reason for being.

Expand full comment

Interesting story, KD. My sister has worked retail grocery all her life; started at a mom and pop convenience store, worked for Fred Meyer (way before Kroeger bought them; Freddy's was a regional chain) 40 years ago at the seafood counter, a year-round Farmer's Market and another regional chain, Ray's Food Place. None of these were union jobs. She finally had enough at Rays when they refused to give her the hours needed to qualify for benefits (I think she averaged 34 hours a week), and applied for work at her local Food 4 Less (a chain, apparently, but this market is independent, run as part of a locally owned and operated grocery chain consisting of 5 grocery stores in 3 communities). They are a union shop, and when she was hired, she was ready to start as an apprentice checker. The store manager hired her as a journeyman, and told her "you're no apprentice. You know more about front-end grocery than anybody here."

Expand full comment
Sep 2Edited

KD-we should also remember how racism has been used to divide labor. Many unions didn’t accept Black members and capitalists used Black people as scabs and strike breakers causing worker conflicts.

Black members of today’s Teamsters declared their support for Harris-Walz because the larger organization wasn’t doing so. An official from this union spoke at the RNC Convention to support Trump-Vance.

Expand full comment

Yeah…trump and his henchmen care none at all about union members ….except that they may share negative perceptions about our country and our increasingly pluralistic society. Years ago I attended a very lavish reception for senior members of a union our company dealt with. It was a very lavish ….over the top….affair that didn’t jibe with anything the union should have represented. It made an impression. I felt as though these people cared not a whit about how they spent their member’s hard earned dues. I think it is still that way in most unions.

Expand full comment

Unions are more likely to have monopoly power as better explained by Marty Manley's comment at https://www.quora.com/How-widespread-is-corruption-in-labor-unions which has enabled some to become perhaps more corrupt than many business monopolies. I believe a retail clerks union local my sister-in-law worked for in New Jersey was an example, as her pay after union dues was less than minimum wage.

Expand full comment

The president of Teamsters reported that he does not support Trump nor Harris. He only spoke at the RNC because they asked him to. He requested to speak at the DNC and they declined. He knows his union is a 50/50 split of R’s and Dems. Harris campaign said they will have a sit-down round table discussion with Teamsters when it can bc arranged. This is per Fave the Nation.

Expand full comment

I agree with everything you have said. However, although it seems that one side is wrong while the other is good, corruption once gave unions a bad name. Organized crime managed workers' dues and investments. Workers had decreasing influence over their domain. It reminds me of a refrain from "Pretty Boy Floyd." Some will rob you with a six-gun, some with a fountain pen.

Expand full comment

A very interesting essay, KD, I don't have a short answer to your examples, but when unions called more of the shots a half century ago, they obtained definite economic benefits for their workers, and likely spillover. That all gradually changed with globalization, where "cheap labour" in Asian / offshore businesses could undermine union based sectors, let alone just wipe out swaths of the manufacturing sector, all at the behest of those running governments, plainly not exactly "labour aligned". A school of economists (the Chicago school?) pushed for this. But the price was a hollowing out of the American middle class, of which I'm sure we all heard much of a generation ago.

Expand full comment

Hoyt, an excellent post. I see a lot of people scratching their heads that some support this festering cancer given that he does not have one redeeming characteristic. My father was a dyed in the wool R who hated unions and FDR. He had started listening to Rush, so I fear he would be a MAGA if he were still here. Needless to say, we did not agree about politics. He once told me, a history major, that history does not matter. But it does and what we see today has a long history in this country.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

As far as I am concerned, the R party of today is the party of death. I was disturbed that my dad listened to Rush and had to explain to him why I didn't....not a friendly conversation I'm afraid. I do wonder what he would do with death star. I once voted for a few Rs here in Oregon, but that was a while ago...people like Mark Hatfield. My next neighbor, who served as a R on the county commission, is now an independent although I think he votes mostly for Ds. He is totally fed up with today's Rs.

Expand full comment

He was one of the Republicans I most respected back when I was one (I left the party during his last full year in the senate). I appreciate his choice of a teaching career after 30 years in the Senate (1967 - 1997).

Expand full comment

By golly Mr Bangs, you seem to have lifted that descriptive paragraph about Trump right out of my book. I desire to anoint you my chief spokesman. But will I need to pay you union wages? Probably.

Expand full comment

Saw a bumper sticker today that said “Just another republican working hard so you don’t have to.” 😑 Their self-righteousness and lack of any grasp on reality are unbelievable.

Expand full comment

If workers are paid more and taxes less the Whole economy will prosper. The greed of the employer has actually held their prosperity in check. Pay workers more, a progressive tax, tax capital gains for those who make over 400,000 a year at the same level as ordinary income, eliminate the Oil Depletion allowance, have Congress deal with the same health care expenses and services as ordinary art Americans and our Economy will prosper beyond expectations. Do what is right and all will be better off.

Expand full comment

If workers are paid more and taxes less the Whole economy will prosper. The greed of the employer has actually held their prosperity in check. Pay workers more, a progressive tax, tax capital gains for those who make over 400,000 a year at the same level as ordinary income, eliminate the Oil Depletion allowance, have Congress deal with the same health care expenses and services as ordinary art Americans and our Economy will prosper beyond expectations. Do what is right and all will be better off.

Expand full comment

Your list of Trump’s attributes sounds fantastical, but is true and well documented. As you say, it leaves us speechless that so many Americans willingly overlook his flaws. It simply staggers the imagination, but as yet no convincing rational explanation has emerged. I like the contrast you have drawn with Harris-Walz and I agree that the emotions they inspire might carry us on to victory, but don’t you think there’s a rational argument against Trump that might open everyone’s eyes? I’m not convinced by “He’s a con-man” or “It’s a cult” or the idea that Americans are uniquely gullible.

Mainly wanted to thank you for your post and I didn’t intend to ramble on like this. I don’t recommend that anyone respond to my rambling…BUT… if someone does and is able to offer any explanation, I’ll be grateful.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hoyt, I’m sure you’re right; “…a multitude of reasons.” Thanks for your reply!

Expand full comment

Hoyt, In addition to agreeing with everything you say, I wish to add two important clarifications.

First, nothing an individual does in life is more indicative of who they are than whether they adhere to or violate the "treat others the way you would want to be treated if the shoe was on the other foot" principle. I vote for candidates who have committed to engage in political practice (serving the whole at the short-term expense of its parts) in lieu of committing political malpractice (benefitting "us" in the short term at the expense of the whole), as I expect others would want me to do.

Second, the complete lack of competence and character within the leadership group now in control of the Republican party will not leave us speechless, but we do need to invest a bit of time, energy, and attention. See all of the above and below.

Expand full comment

Hoyt Bangs, that was marvelous.

Expand full comment

I may have mentioned this before but the are lawn signs which say I vote for felons.

Expand full comment

But they aren't personal possessions, they're stage props. Remember, after he'd noticed the bible was upside down and turned it round, a voice asked if it was his Bible. ("No, but it's a bible"). The flag-hugging act on stage. Flag, patriotism, Bible, Christmas - just PROPS, meaningless, but they have to look like the real thing. Melania's comment about Christmas, when she'd gone through the ritual welcoming of the lorry full of fir trees.

Expand full comment

Prof Richardson, I don’t know how you can produce such well written history essays, with links to now, complete with citations night after night. But I am so grateful that you can! Thank you.

Expand full comment

And I learned a new word * mobocracy *

Expand full comment

Then there's kakistocracy for government by the worst, a good description of the MAGAmobocracy.

Expand full comment

"Republicans" have clearly abandoned faith in a republic. "Kakistocrats" is more fitting and more of truth in advertising.

Expand full comment

JL, how about KakaPubliCan'ts? My junior high brain has spoken.

Expand full comment

🤣

Expand full comment

Yes, and the current Trump party is afraid of the mobocracy they helped create.

Expand full comment

Peter, when I see that word I think kakatocracy. Is that a synonym?

Expand full comment

There is "kakocracy", a synonym. Both words come from the Greek "kakos", meaning "bad".

I like Ally House's "KakaPubliCan'ts", having, since the days of George W. Bush been impressed by how he and the GOP had taken America's famed CAN DO spirit and changed it into... CAN'T DO... WON'T DO...

Nah!

There's any amount of CANT where that came from...

Expand full comment

💩!!! hahahaha…

Expand full comment

I liked that too 🫶

Expand full comment

YES!!! I am so glad also! Thank you Heather!

Expand full comment

Well said, Meredith. My sentiments exactly. I grew up in a staunchly Republican family. Through maturity, education, and observation I became staunchly independent but haven’t voted Republican since Bob Dole ran for president. It is common for those in power to take advantage of those without. Corporations are not an exception to that practice. That shouldn’t be difficult to see. Robert Reich has a great column out today.

Expand full comment

That expresses exactly how I feel and am certain that most of the Profs readers feel the same.

Expand full comment

Every time I read one of her well crafted histories, I think of Paul Simon. "When I think of all the crap I learned in high school it's a wonder I can think at all." Heather Cox Richardson, the cure for high school history!

Expand full comment

"And though my lack of education hasn't hurt me none,

I can read the writing on the wall"

Expand full comment

Education, to me, is never completed, most keep learning well beyond their formal schooling. Learning how to learn is more important to me than just stopping at lessons from the past.

Perhaps I should include refining what we think we learned, identifying that which was wrong or unhelpful, and striving to constantly improve and adapt to new conditions.

Expand full comment