866 Comments

Every woman knows, and I’m old enough to remember, that anti-abortion laws do not stop abortion—they only stop SAFE abortion. Desperate women will always find ways to end their pregnancies. The challenge is not to end their own lives in the process.

Expand full comment

Karen, I know that personally. I watched a sister come close to death after my mother took her for an illegal abortion. My parents knew it was wrong, so they let my sister hemorrhage for a week until I came home from school one day and found her crawling to the bathroom; she couldn’t walk. I threatened my mother with taking her to the doctor myself if she didn’t come home to take her. By the time she got her to the hospital, the doctor said less than 24 hours and she would have died. 1971.

Making abortion illegal doesn’t stop it. It just kills women. And these men don’t care.

Expand full comment

There are so many absolutely horrid and unconscionable things at play here, Cheri, but I think that this aspect is the very worst. We must hope that these self-righteous and heartless monsters have now taken this a bridge too far and that there will be a hurricane of pushback. I am appalled and, I daresay, ashamed to be a member of the same species as these monsters. I am this morning reminded of Aristotle's words, something close to “Educating your mind without educating your heart is no education at all”

Expand full comment

The truth is John, there are good men everywhere and there are ignorant women everywhere. It does little good to think all women are pro-abortion rights or that all men are libertine fuckers (literally!) Ignorance is the enemy as I see it, followed closely by adherence to beliefs without logic.

Expand full comment

absolutamente, Hope

Expand full comment

I would add that, with most male "pro-life" supporters, there's a huge dose of control freak going on.

Expand full comment

Not sure I understand what you mean, Nancy. I'd like to. Can you explain?

Expand full comment

I think that many males who are pro-life actually want to control women, and use children to accomplish that. While I understand that many people are against abortion, mostly for religious reasons, for the others, the old saying "barefoot and pregnant" is their motivation.

Expand full comment

My mother worked the night shift in admissions at a hospital during the1940's. She had horror stories about women coming in late at night after a disastrous abortion either self-administered or done buy some back alley quack. Women are in a world of danger right now. Welcome to our Third World moral/medical/political status. Time to take to the streets until that, too, becomes illegal.

Expand full comment

The insensitivity of people, both men and women, to this REAL horror of our past in a so-called civilized country twists my guts, Patricia. I think that many zealots, either not alive or seriously misinformed before Roe v Wade, must not remember or simply chose to forget this aspect. How else could they wish to return us to it? It is clear that a large majority of Americans favoured access to abortion under reasonable conditions at the time of the 7-2 Roe v Wade decision in 1973, and today's polls show that support has fallen only a little since. So much for democracy. Making it illegal will not stop abortions. Children of the rich will continue to have them in safe places. Children of the poor and the poor themselves will die on coat hangers in the allies. I hate to put it so starkly, but this is how it seems to me.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely right. As someone else commented, this really isn't about protecting the unborn. It's about men controlling women. I appreciate your take on this and that you support the rights of woman. Men need to stand up and be counted.

Expand full comment

I am posting the picture on my FB page of the GOP elephant made from a coat hanger.

Expand full comment

I've found one on Reddit and it is as stated there, 'one of the best political cartoons I've ever seen', even if it brings tears to my eyes.

Expand full comment

Stephen, you’re a wonderful salve as we process through this diabolical insanity!

Expand full comment

I wish I could see it.

Expand full comment

Just Google "elephant GOP clothes hanger" and click on 'images'.

Expand full comment

Actually, John, you are a breath of fresh air!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Marlene. I TRY but it is so hard to understand what these folks are thinking and why.

Expand full comment

They would use your sister's situation as a "see, you deserved this." Republican false judgement is first and foremost in every decision they make.

Expand full comment

We already have the highest number of women that die during/from childbirth.

Expand full comment

Oh my God.

Expand full comment

The Party of Sedition the do not care about women's lives. They only care about white power.

Expand full comment

Exactly. This really isn’t about not killing the unborn. It’s about controlling women.

Expand full comment

... from what I see, the most effective way to control young females is to get them pregnant - keep them so busy trying to care for children their hands are tied, feet bound, hearts broken and minds bent beyond repair ... young people (male and female) need to know their lives and inborn talents are worth more and deserve better ....

Expand full comment

Possibly we’re seeing that now. The birth rate is declining. All of my young women daughters finished college, were over 30, some with graduate degrees, before having children. One with two children, the others have one each. Myself and some friends just had a discussion about how we pulled ourselves up from families with different types of abuse and now are witnessing the change in our children. I’m hoping the women of Texas will not stand for this.

Expand full comment

Not ALL the women of Texas clutch their pearls and let their men takeover.

Expand full comment

My twin daughters are over 39, are educated, compassionate and carve their own paths. I couldn’t be prouder of them - though I’d like to see them more often.

Expand full comment

I have two daughters in their 30's. They have both opted not to have children because they told me they think it is unfair to the child that they be born in this present society. I will be the grandparent to their animals and that's that!

Expand full comment

White male power.

Expand full comment

There are also some pretty creepy women who like that white male power. Sadists or just ignorant?

Expand full comment

They like that white male power because they benefit when their man benefits. More than half of white women voters voted for Trump in 2016.

Expand full comment

How many of these women are the “housewife”. They stay at home and are taken care of by men. The crazy neighbor I have who voted for Trump only had tiny clerical jobs her whole life and her husband didn’t even want her to work. I was always amazed at how little she knew about the real world. She preached her religion at me. She didn’t care if Trump was a sexual predator. I don’t talk to her anymore and we used to walk every morning. She was also very obsessed by money and did everything they could to avoid paying taxes. The majority of Democratic friends we have don’t look for every loophole to avoid paying taxes. They understand that’s where services and infrastructure come from. They don’t try to circumvent the laws.

Expand full comment

Several years ago I registered voters for the League of Women Voters. I was at an event where there were a lot of women in attendance. One of them I approached actually turned up her nose at me and replied, "Oh, I *never* vote. I leave that to my husband."

Expand full comment

Sadly, most republican women I know are college-educated professionals. They weren't very vocal or loud about their support of Trump but ended up voting for him anyway.

Expand full comment

Not really. Their "man" benefits an they get to see their man as winner for a moment (which often temporarily interrupts their mistreatment at his hands), but later will feel the reality. The reality is that they lose, their loser "man" loses (losers lose, it's a rule) and beatings (if that is the case) often resume.

Expand full comment

Not in 2020.

Expand full comment

They benefit from it until they decide that they are being dominated. Then they pay for their submissiveness.

Expand full comment

Stepford mentality plain and simple. Surrender self worth for subjugation.

Call to arms, Penelope. On our terms.

Expand full comment

Sadists, ignorant, resentful...

Take your pick, it's a mixed bag of nuts.

Expand full comment

Of the same mindset. There are some pretty creepy mothers of children who engage in power struggles long into their adulthood, never ever grasping the concept of mutual respect.

Expand full comment

Yes, I have spent my career educating youth, cleaning up after abusive parents who should never had had kids, taking them in as foster children and one adoption. And I have seen plenty in my therapy of people dealing with mental health, substance abuse and self-esteem issues due to parents—who should not have been.

Expand full comment

"...cleaning up after abusive parents who should never had had kids" (cough cough Stephen Miller cough cough)

Expand full comment

In a large part it matters how they are treated by their caregivers as their egos are developing in the earliest years. Neural pathways in the brain.

Expand full comment

White Christian male power (particularly for the wealthy and affluent)

Expand full comment

... including an endless supply of babies and children with no homes or parents to protect them ... to satiate the boundless appetite for "fresh meat" - the younger and fresher the better ... sick, sick sh!t ....

Expand full comment

And for those of us who have been foster parents and worked with adopted kids...the costs of unwanted children on a society are immense., more so on the children themselves who will need food, shelter, clothing, mental health support, hospitalization, education, and most of all love. How will the fascist-leaners provide all of that when they hate socialism and socialist democracies?

Expand full comment

The focus is on getting a fetus to taking its first breath. After that, who cares? Our society demonstrates this daily.

Expand full comment

Would these anti-maskers, pro-lifers wear a mask to protect a newly breathing baby during a global epidemic?

Expand full comment

Nope!

Expand full comment

They won't see a need to provide all of that, Penelope ... in their sadistic, malicious playbook, such youngsters will submit to the rapist agenda, or be farmed out to global "big box" markets, or die. I'm working to uphold a creative outlook, so won't even start to paint the verrry ugly picture of what that agenda could be ... thanks to you for outspoken concern and willingness to help those in need ... blessings, strength and perseverence to you ....

Expand full comment

Many thanks for your words and strength and roundedness to all of us as we persevere.

Expand full comment

That was supposed to be "groundedness!" But I have grown slightly rounder in the past six years due to stress.

Expand full comment

They gladly won't provide anything if they can help-they want brainless drones.

Expand full comment

Appears they have done a great job cultivating them. Geeze, the Matrix has nothing on the Party of Sedition.

Expand full comment

I am encouraged to read your characterization of "sick, sick sh!t ....".

Remain clear-eyed about what's going on and survive.

Expand full comment

Thank you Daniel.

Expand full comment

White male power.

Expand full comment

A desperate girl when my kids were in high school threatened her boyfriend she would tell his parents she was pregnant if he didn’t help her. We’ll never know what help she wanted because he killed her! It was so extremely awful! My daughter knew the boyfriend through his previous girlfriend. The previous girlfriend wouldn’t give into him and he dumped her. Literally dodging that bullet! Texas. It’s just scary for women!

Expand full comment

Hope he is or was in jail. And guess what—his parents found out, didn’t they?

Expand full comment

So true. Affluent Texas women will get their abortions safely while on expensive vacations. Poor women will find some way to do what their survival requires. And it will be a lot less safe.

Expand full comment

This is a pretty ingenious law. They had better not get a ride to the airport for that expensive vacation. Even from an Uber. And had better hope their husband or lover is on board with the Expensive Vacation.

Expand full comment

Before I was born, my mom was forced to submit to a back street coat hanger style abortion. She damn near bled to death. This is at the heart of my advocacy for women’s rights to choose.

Expand full comment

Correct! Safe and legal a abortion is the issue. I am old enough to remember women dying from self induced abortion and, those with resources having "appendicitis" to hide an illegal abortion before passage of abortion rights legislation in NYS followed by Roe vs. Wade in the 1970's. Poor women and those without resources always suffer the greatest burden.

Expand full comment

My mom had an abortion, when married to dad (a mutual decision) in a hotel with a nurse. Thankfully all turned out well.

Expand full comment

Those laws only legally stop abortions for women who can’t afford them. Well-to-do women can afford to check into a hospital and have a D+C (dilation and curitage). Has always been this way.

Expand full comment

Yes. Poor people will suffer most. And this makes absolutely no sense in a state where white men fear the rising population of anyone unlike themselves.

Expand full comment

Please think again about the difficulties of doing this without incriminating anyone else—or giving them an opportunity for bounty hunting. Including Uber drivers.

Expand full comment

I'm seeing (in my mind) a rise in home abortion kits, with full technology thrown at it. Cameras on goosenecks, suction machines, YouTube videos, etc.

Expand full comment

New Orleans, 1968. A girl I was having sex with got pregnant. We were great in bed but not compatible as life partners, yet the only option then and there was I said we could get married. She knew better and disappeared for a week and was no longer pregnant. IDK if she went to New York (an option back then) or if our mutual pharmacist friend (who was also a candidate for father) helped her end it, but that is now the State of Texass.

Expand full comment

Rob, "A girl I was having sex with got pregnant" almost sounds as if you had nothing to do with it and some bad juju happened to her. How about "I got a girl pregnant" or "A girl and I started a pregnancy" or "I impregnated a girl". I don't think you meant to divorce yourself from your part in the pregnancy, but see how important semantics are? This underlying dissociation of men from the process is part of the problem!

Expand full comment

Maybe you missed the part about the pharmacist who was a candidate for fatherhood. He introduced me to her and like everyone of those years he was having sex with her before I met her (and possibly while we were dating). So, I stand by the FACTS of the situation as stated. Explicitly, a girl I was having sex with got pregnant and I MAY have caused it.

Expand full comment

Well, we know that Governor Abbott cares about women's health, don't we?

Expand full comment

So here is my suggestion: since women cannot be sued if they seek an abortion but anyone around them can, sue every male over the age of puberty--especially every male member (I use that term advisedly) in the state legislature and TX administration that voted in favor of these laws--as abetting the potential for women to have abortions by the fact that they are the only half of the species that can impregnate women. If these fuckers (and no: I cannot this morning moderate my language) are going to have sex with women, then they should be sued for potentially encouraging women to have abortions.

Expand full comment

'A class action suit has been filed by the country's Lysistrata Movement against Texas Male member legislators and Male member administrative staff 'fuckers' who voted, supported and or funded anti-democratic laws passed in the state. Linda Mitchell and Ellie Kona are the brilliant masterminds behind this startling new campaign against America's Dystopia.' (ANONYMOUS source)

Expand full comment

We should just have a 'Dick tax' to fund all abortions.

Expand full comment

Oh, Stephen, thank you for the much needed laughter!!

Expand full comment

So funny, and even more so, coming from a guy! Almost made my blinding headache go away.

Expand full comment

I know. It was so brilliant that a Stephen, a man (assumption) made that suggestion!!

Expand full comment

You mean, not a Richard?!?

Expand full comment

HAHAHA! I have a friend named Dick and the only time he uses "Richard" is at a restaurant or where they might call his name across a crowd, loudly. I think, in this day and age, I would change my name to Rich or Ritchie.

Expand full comment

'Manchin calls on Democrats to ‘pause’ and cut their $3.5 trillion spending plan, dealing potential blow to Biden agenda' (Washington Post)

OK, Stephen from Sunny Seattle and all subscribers, WHAT DO WE DO TO JOE?

Expand full comment

I am more sanguine about Senator Manchin than are many of you. He was governor of WV then senator in a state that voted 70% for Trump. He is slow stepping some of the more rambunctious proposed Democratic initiatives. On voting rights, he stated that the stronger bill had no chance, but supported the John Lewis bill. I think that his intention to whittle down the $3.5 trillion (over ten years) human infrastructure bill reflects some moderate realization. I wonder, when push comes to shove, whether he would nibble at the filibuster to get a moderate voting bill. Remember, it ain’t over ‘til the fat lady sings.

Expand full comment

Keith, I cannot wait until it's over.

National voting rights legislation is the first and most urgent priority for citizens who support democratic principles. The speed with which bills have been passed in states dominated by Republican legislatures, which reduce access to voting by minorities, while making it easy to subvert elections couldn't be more threatening to our election process. The need to pass effective national legislation to counteract this abuse is not political. What the Republicans are doing, however, is a power grab.

You may know a great deal about this issue, nevertheless, I encourage you to pursue information on this subject from The Brennan Center for Justice. I am providing a link below. If you would like me you send you a few articles from reputable sources, please let me know. I would also appreciate hearing from you again about this matter.

'The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on the fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution – part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group – the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector.

At this critical moment, the Brennan Center is dedicated to protecting the rule of law and the values of Constitutional democracy. We focus on voting rights, campaign finance reform, ending mass incarceration, and preserving our liberties while also maintaining our national security. Part think tank, part advocacy group, part cutting-edge communications hub, we start with rigorous research. We craft innovative policies. And we fight for them – in Congress and the states, the courts, and in the court of public opinion.

https://www.brennancenter.org/

Expand full comment

Thank you! Given the current sociopolitical climate crisis, I hope and pray your efforts pay off.

Expand full comment

Keith, is Manchin slow stepping a wise strategy, though? You have experience and insight far beyond me, however, is tiptoeing through the minefield of US politics and decision making the best option for the country at this time?

Expand full comment

Darian It’s a long game, with November, 2022 a plausible deadline. I’m not sure of anything. Still, Senator Manchin still is capable of fourth quarter semi-heroics. I have hope, but no certainty.

Expand full comment

Why am I not shocked? I'm so deflated by everything that has happened this week that I'm currently unable to come up with anything clever or funny to say, and if I suggest bodily harm, I'll be barred from comments. Maybe later. Stephen?

Expand full comment

There is a time for humour, there is a time for hunkering down in the trenches and doing research, there is a time for action. Most of my time is spent in the trenches.

Lincoln's Bible is on fire today.

https://twitter.com/LincolnsBible/status/1433773254246690823

Expand full comment

Wow, Stephen, you delivered! Quite an impressive lineup, and you have talked me off the ledge. There are some really heavy hitters prepared to do battle, so maybe we're not doomed to fail after all. Thanks for this.

Expand full comment

Yes. 😆

Expand full comment

No Sexin' for Texans!

Expand full comment

My sister came up with an idea for a t-shirt/sticker: TEXANS ❤️ RAPISTS!

Expand full comment

Women in Texas need to revolt and according to Texas law arm themselves if anyone tries to attack them. Texas wants women under their thumb, work full time to help support a family, and barefoot, pregnant and chained to the kitchen sink. It's not the 1950s anymore. If women refused sex, real men would care and help reverse this law.

Expand full comment

Our own Linda Mitchen and Ellie Kona!! Hooorayyy! How can we support this?!!

Expand full comment

Oops- sorry, Linda Mitchell! Seriously, can we submit class actions suits? Women are protected federally, I thought. It is hard for me to not think of a large posse for America's democracy right now.

Expand full comment

Poor Linda. Too much Manchin on the mind. Unless the morph works for Linda to set Joe straight!

Expand full comment

I know, cross between Mitch and Manchin. A THOUSAND apologies to dear Linda!

Expand full comment

Fantastic. As I said….DO NOT devalue, demote, disenfranchise, or deregulate a woman’s worth.

Good morning, Fern.

We’ve made it to our own war room to give our piece about peace.

Expand full comment

Hi ya, pal, We've got many miles to go. Roe v Wade will be decided by the un Supreme Court when the following case is decided:

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The Court granted certiorari to the petition on May 17, 2021, limiting the case to the single question "Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional." The case is expected to be heard during the 2021–22 term.

TC is providing us with some current material for a seminar for what is in front of us re democracy. We've got the highest mountain to climb. The seeds of this began decades ago.

Expand full comment

Sorry Fern, Roe v. Wade is dead, we’re just waiting for the Republican SCOTUS to write the obituary. Mitch McConnell won. The Supreme Court does not represent America, it’s a partisan, Christian fascist tribunal.

Expand full comment

JR, It is easy to write an obituary. If you must, please wait to send me another when it is factual. I don't write this an an optimist, because that is not my flavor. If you read my comments, they are generally informative, encouraging and I hope spirited.

Expand full comment

It’s not easy for me to write an obituary. It’s also not helpful to pretend a flat-lined patient is going to recover. Roe v. Wade died last night. It went into the ICU in2016 when McConnell quashed the Garland nomination. It went critical when Kavanaugh and Bryant were crammed down our throats. The plug was pulled last night, when the Christian Taliban majority on the court endorsed the Texas abortion bounty law. It’s over. Abortion is now, or soon will be, illegal in 3/4s of the US. Now what do we do, is the question.

Expand full comment

I replied to you with two links concerning information, which may be of interest. Given your rude response to me, perhaps, you didn't see the post or open it.

Expand full comment

I really, really wanted this to be true.

Expand full comment

Yes, that and the very idea that males who impregnate women without their consent can be sued for contributing to the need for abortion ...

Expand full comment

I LOVE that idea!

Expand full comment

Ayyyy, you really had me going in the first line! Thank you, Fern, for a welcome laugh in dark days of rage.

Expand full comment

Best comment I've read in a looooong time!

Expand full comment

Old school is the new school!

Expand full comment

Fern, thank you for this info! Brilliant is so right!!

Expand full comment

How about a Texas Sex Strike. No more sex until the law is repealed.

Expand full comment

Yes. The Lysistrata Option. I've been advocating that since yesterday.

Expand full comment

Of course, it would be more effective if implemented by the wives and mistresses of TX lawmakers, but they will always be able to hop on a plane to California or New York and receive the best of care while doing some shopping.

Expand full comment

There is a movie from last year "Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Always", which is about a young teenage woman who travels out of state to get an abortion. When she gets there, the interviewer asks her to answer questions with one of the four words of the title. Perhaps wives and mistresses of the TX lawmakers could ask the guys questions of how those guys treat them.

Expand full comment

There is a fine line between a courtesan and a prostitute. In this case, I bluntly suggest the latter.

Expand full comment

courtesans get to negotiate conditions and are better paid?

Expand full comment

Thanks, Sharon, I just posted the story but made the point that I couldn't remember her name. Lysistrata is a great play to see.

Expand full comment

I hope it is going to be produced everywhere this year, as Julius Caesar was after the Former Guy was elected. In high schools as well as on Broadway and in local theaters!

Expand full comment

A great Greek author wrote a play, the title of which I forget, before the alleged birth of Jesus that did just that. In the play, the men were always going to war, and the women decided to get them to stop it. The woman, whose name is the title, convinced all of the women to tell the men that they wouldn't have sex with them until they stopped warring.

Expand full comment

Lysistrata, by Aristophanes.

Expand full comment

Women in Africa did the same - and it worked.

Expand full comment

Gay people can have sex though.

Expand full comment

Sad to say, given the Republican autocratic individuals in legislatures and SCOTUS members, I can easily imagine the next law in line for Republicans across the country could well be a law to forbid artificial insemination &/or surrogacy specifically for gay couples and SCOTUS saying it's OK to discriminate against LBGTQ persons seeking those procedures, but would be OK for white "Christians".

Expand full comment

I approve of your verbal rage this morning. All people should be enraged. We have fought this fight before. But, our African Americans and Native Americans and other POC have never stopped having to fight. So, we are back in good company and need to zero in on the out of control white, male patriarchy right now with all of power and our votes.

Expand full comment

Agree, Linda. That is definitely a road and I hope the capable legal leaders of Planned Parenthood and such are on it. And moderating your language? I applaud your abandonment of moderation.

“Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, nor Hell a fury like a woman scorned" is the full quotation from William Congreve's 'The Mourning Bride' (1697). Probably the fundamental message in this story is a lesson for life.”

Expand full comment

Women here in Portugal have mostly decided not to marry because the marriage laws are so unfavorable to them. Instead, they find a likely partner, move in, have a baby and move out. If he refuses to pay for her and her baby’s exlenses, she sues and is awarded

Expand full comment

…payments from his income by the courts or goes to prison. And Portuguese prison is no joke.

Expand full comment

Curious. You are ex-Pat? How long in Portugal. Is it as beautiful as they say?

Expand full comment

Portugal has always been on my travel list for some reason. Just added a real one. Brava!

Expand full comment

Making a woman angry after getting her pregnant could go very badly for men. <eg>

Expand full comment

Linda, you have spotted the problem. Lorena Bobbit had a point!

Expand full comment

I'm putting a Bobbit-head figurine of Abbot on my car's dashboard.

Expand full comment

HAHA!

Expand full comment

Thanks for that clever comment that put a smile on my face!

Expand full comment

Brava - absolutely yes!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Your suggestion to sue every male beyond puberty is delightfully clever. I wish I had thought of that.

Expand full comment

I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like dickhead abatement to me.

Expand full comment

It really is up to the women in Texas to fight for their individual rights and safety. I'm wondering if they will.

Expand full comment

Well, Martha, they might need help since no matter what they do they might be turned it or held at gun-point or whatever. The white cowboys of Texan have laid down the final gauntlet as has half of the corrupt Supreme Court which has castrated our democracy with this decision. Women around the world need help- but we have to start on our own soil today.

Expand full comment

Amen, Penelope! We women must stick together. By the way, there will be another Women's March on 10/2. Please check your local areas to attend one.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Marlene! I am a member of The Women's March and this time they sent me a notification, way in advance so we can plan!! Thank you so much, I will get the word out! And dust off my M95 (mask!).

Expand full comment

You can help them by donating to former Congresswoman Katie Hill’s "HER TIME PAC.”

And while I'm typing, It surprised me that my comment to the effect that “any woman who votes for any Republican whatsoever should have her head examined” bothered some because it didn’t include men as well and was therefore in a convoluted way, sexist. Of course, no responsible, thinking, American regardless of gender should vote for today’s Republicans but the monstrous legislation passed in Texas, which the SCOTUS is letting slide by, was specifically directed at abortions, a procedure which a woman might choose to undergo, and that is why I directed my comment to women.

In any event, a donation to "HER TIME PAC” might be helpful in supporting candidates opposed to such bad legislation. I don’t object to the fact that the candidates they support are all women.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the suggestion, Jack, and I see no reason to apologize for your prior comment.

Expand full comment

I LOVE this idea. LOVE it!

Expand full comment

I love you , Linda! And Ellie too! Lysistrata is my most favorite plays of all times. The only one that spoke directly to me when I was studying the Great Books.

Expand full comment

So be it.

Expand full comment

Well, I guess there are 2 things that have to be done right now. Firstly, the Supreme Court needs to have 4 new members tomorrow to overturn this "originalist" majority and it must go back to its "original", less intrusive, constitutional role. Secondly the Filibuster must go for being the anti-democratic rule that it is.....a majority decides and that means 50%+1...;so that this country can be saved from its own worst instincts. This can not be allowed to take any time to put in place. Heavan and earth must be moved.

There is no time to waste now as there is only one year left for the little democracy that we now know. Otherwise we are back not only to "full Jim Crow" but also to systematic repression of all and sundry not agreeing with the new GOP fascist dictators....and not rich! At this rate, inaction by the SCOTUS is treasonable action but inaction by the Democrats is also treason....a betrayal of the trust of the People and the interests of the Nation. I trust that those saying that one should obey the rules to show a good example to those breaking the rules .....and be "nice"...can now see where that leads. The road to hell.......

Vigilantism marks the end of the rule of law...and with the Supreme Court's "silent" approval. It has been used in the past to kill Native Americans (The founding philosophy of the Texas Rangers et al). It has been used to kill blacks in the slave states and beyond. Tomorrow it will be used to kill you. A call to action!

Expand full comment

Yeah like didn’t Texas have a zillion gun deaths before this law? I love Biden but getting more SupremeCourt judges is no simple solution. I had a trip to Provence all set for the end of this month. Had to cancel it all because of The EU’s reaction to the US Covid numbers. Remember when the title The Ugly American was popular— guess what? Now I would add Stupid to the moniker.

Expand full comment

Liz there is a phrase I use (and I think I have posted here, and not my original phrase) - You can medicate crazy but you can’t fix stupid. And this is what we live with - the ignorance of the GOP and their followers. 10+ years back I remember being called a “bleeding heart liberal”because I support programs that lift individuals but my response was always - at least I have a heart. The GOP lacks a heart, brain, and balls . . .I mean courage. The Texas Taliban indeed.

Expand full comment

Amen Laurie— down with the a—holes!

Expand full comment

I was just in Provence at the end of July (it was HOT!). Didn’t realize it was a small window to travel but glad I got the chance when I did.

Expand full comment

Good for you— I’m tres disappointed but still hoe for next year

Expand full comment

Ugly, stupid, selfish, self-destructive.

Expand full comment

So Stuart, I agree with you, but being here in the US, with each state having its own issues that its citizens need to pay very close attention to, it is hard to know what legislative evils are being concocted in other areas of the US. Texas, for some reason, is particularly bad right now, but there are other states trying to follow closely in those footsteps. As just one person, I don't have the money to add to every fight, and since I still work, I don't have extra time to try to ferret these things out. When "polls" show that a majority of the citizenry in a state do not agree with a new law going into place, why is it being allowed to pass and be signed into law? Maybe that is a question we should start working on an answer to..that and so many other things. The far-right Republican rise is foreshadowing much evil in this country, and I am fearful for my grandchildren.

Expand full comment

It's happening because we give our elected politicians too much "discretionary" power. They have to be put on a "referendum leash" .

Expand full comment

And then look at what's happening in California. A recall that may succeed in putting a Republican in the Governor's chair with a tiny minority. Talk about upside down political mechanisms!!

Expand full comment

A legal obligation to vote goes with the package. The people then decide.

Expand full comment

A legal obligation to show up and turn in a ballot, even a blank one (as a sort of protest) if you really cannot choose the lesser evil.

Expand full comment

And a legal obligation to allow all the people to do it.

Expand full comment

This "legal obligation" is a fantasy, right?

Expand full comment

Not following your response - please claify

Expand full comment

The only current worry of the Dems in California is that people will not be bothered to turn out...not taking their responsibilty might allow a minority GOP candidate to slip through.

Expand full comment

I'm a New Yorker, but I Love California too. Oh. My. God. If that nincompoop Elder gets the governorship, I won't know whether to sh*t or go crazy. It would be unimaginable in a sane universe for that to be possible. And yet, here we are.

Expand full comment

Tell me about it! Can't stand Elder! Gavin isn't perfect but by God, he has navigated us through Covid rather beautifully. If we had Elder, we all would be sick as dogs! NO on the Recall!

Expand full comment

Not just "a Republican" but someone with absolutely no experience and many holding extreme right-wing beliefs. Some are plain bizarre. I just saw, on the morning local news, that of the number of mail ballots returned, more than twice the number of Democrats than Republicans have voted to date. Still almost 2 weeks to final vote, September 14. We'll see. https://ktla.com/news/california/recall-election-ballots-returned-so-far-show-that-more-than-twice-as-many-democrats-have-voted-than-republicans/

Expand full comment

"Among the list of 47 candidates, an ABC 10News/Survey USA poll from early August showed six candidates are among the lead by voters polled: Democrat Kevin Paffrath (27%) and Republicans Larry Elder (23%), John Cox (10%), Kevin Faulconer (5%), Caitlyn Jenner (4%), and Kevin Kiley (3%).

Here's a look at these candidates and their arguments for why they should be the next governor of California." https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/your-voice-your-vote/california-recall-election-a-look-at-the-frontrunners

Expand full comment

Yes, Ned, totally insane. Only in America, land of masochists.

Expand full comment

It happens because elected Republicans do their own will, not the will of the people who elected them. They join the club and are radicalized to do the will of the party instead of what their constituents elected them to do.

Expand full comment

Hi Stuart. I agree referendums have their uses, but the devil is in the details of how they are... regulated, for lack of a better word. I worry when a loud but small minority of voters can get something on the ballot which is unclear or dishonestly formulated or financed by big money sources hiding in the shadows, or simply not thought through sufficiently. Also, how many people must vote for a referendum for the result to be considered legal? How many voters are a quorum? Should there be a simple majority to pass it or two thirds or what? How is the result translated into enforceable law and who does that? (The Congress that couldn't pass the legislation the people needed?) Are referendum results subject to judicial review? How soon after a referendum becomes law can there be a "counter" referendum. Can a referendum change the Constitution in addition to changing laws?

Here in Italy there are sometimes referendums that fail because not enough people show up to vote, or because the parliament ignores them and they never become law. Also, the highest court here can disqualify referendums it considers unconstitutional, and has done so on several occasions I can remember. Sometimes the signatures of the people and organizations proposing a referendum have been falsified.

In any case, as the Italians say, referendums can be a real "casino", which in everyday conversation means "mess", but was earlier used to refer to brothels.

I would lessen our politicians' discretionary power by amending, rewriting and otherwise updating and clarifying our amazing Constitution. At this point the risk of a Constitutional convention is certainly no worse than just letting the GOP complete its Fascist .transformation.

I guess I see no point in having representative democracy if what we really want is direct democracy.

Expand full comment

All very good questions which have to be addressed. I keep coming back to Switzerland who severly limit what politicians can decide for themselves and it works very well. Once you have a party that scraps the rulebook, the people have to tie them up...like a rabid dog.

Expand full comment

Totally.

Expand full comment

The people need to take back that power by requiring laws to be voted on by the people. If they want less government let’s give them less. Take away the gerrymandering local state legislatures and let the people vote. Even at the federal level, require the people to vote on infrastructure, stimulus, voting rights, etc. and remove all the voting roadblocks.

Expand full comment

Amen. What action can we take? It is outrageous, plus as you say, there are so many things going down the drain it is difficult to know where to direct our actions.

Expand full comment

When HCR sounds pessimistic, you know things are bad. TC in LA and others have been quite open about the current dangers. Democrats will fail as every progressive group or government has in the past when faced with a determined fascist opponent. They argue among themselves instead of facing the real problem. They allowed Lenin to come to power in 1917 and Hitler in 1933. O'Toole and the CPC in Canada in 2021, and Trump/DeSantis/Hawley in 2024. Ukraine seems like not a bad place to live.

Expand full comment

Similar tendencies here too.

Expand full comment

All against all. Nasty, brutish, and short. I'm glad I am old. I worry about my kids and grandkids. Moderates may not live long enough to worry about global warming killing them directly.

Expand full comment

Many moderates have already been killed directly by climate change, along with people of other political persuasions. In floods and fires, from heat stroke etc.

Expand full comment

You are right about that. There just haven't been too many killed for being moderates...yet. And we haven't even begun to see shooting wars over resources like water. I guess places like Syria were triggered by drought driving rural people into urban centres. Whiskey's for drinkin', Water's for fightin' over.

Expand full comment

"And we haven't even begun to see shooting wars over resources like water."

That's for sure. Water is the most primal human need for survival, and we disrespect and abuse it at every turn. There are already serious problems in the U.S. with drought. And polluted water is a problem throughout the country--whether it be from toxic dumps of factory chemicals or from rusted out toxic storage dumps or intentional dumps of toxic chemicals or mercury from coal mining which has toxified so many natural waterways and on and on.... For example, seven years ago when 300,000 residents of Charleston, WV woke up to radio/tv warnings not to drink, bathe, shower, or cook with their water due to severe chemical pollution of the city water. Or consider the lead pollution of the water in Flint, MI. The problems of available water and polluted water are bound to get worse.

Expand full comment

For the last 30 years at least, Republicans have executed too very simple strategies. First, they have manufactured or adopted extreme positions with the goal of dividing and conquering. Second, they oppose, challenge, and crucify every single thing the Democrats do or say. Truth, facts, and evidence be damned!

As a result, every piece of legislation, and every executive action is carefully crafted and parsed to gain political advantage or mute potential fallout. In other words, good policymaking always takes a backseat to political repercussions. Most politicians prioritize the impact on their tenure over what's best for the country. There are literally tens of thousands of examples of this having occurred, especially in the last 30 years. This is the primary reason why this country is ungovernable and why democracy is fundamentally extinct.

Expand full comment

Seems as though crystal clarity comes from the outside looking in! (Paris France) We have so many answers to our own country’s atrocities, but where’s the action? How is it that these unfair inhumane laws get put into action? How is it that Republicans can get away with voting Against the will of the majority of their constituents? I am flabbergasted!

Expand full comment

They’ve been on this mission for awhile. Citizen’s United. Gerrymandering. Packing the courts. It takes evil to see evil. Until it’s impossible to not see it.

Expand full comment

Yes, this has been a plan being set up since Reagan's days.

Expand full comment

In full view of anyone who reads the news.

Expand full comment

Right —well many of them are rich aided by dark money and they’re focused on keeping power. Life is easier because they don’t care about much else.

Expand full comment

Still, they should not be able to mess with our voting rights. They should be the most protected thing we have in a democratic republic.

Expand full comment

In reply to Penelope:

They should be.

But they are not!

Expand full comment

The Texas Dems were heroic when they left the state twice to prevent quorum when their voter suppression legislation came up. Where were they when this draconian anti-abortion law was on the table? Where was the media?

Expand full comment

The media was busy berating Biden for leaving Afghanistan.

Expand full comment

Press critic Eric Boehlert tells us everything we need to know about the media's stunning dereliction of duty.

https://pressrun.media/p/afghan-obsession-how-the-press-missed

Expand full comment

Yes, this about the media's definitely stunning dereliction of duty re Texas SB 8. But why were the Texas Dem legislators not sounding the alarm??? When this bill was being proposed, BEFORE it passed???

Expand full comment

Hardly surprising that after a Trump administration Mafia tactics involving media-assisted diversions and shyster lawyers with a perfect sense of opportunistic timing should become par for the course, as throughout the conman’s entire career.

Mob lawyers always strike during vacation time or when some incident (planned or seized upon) has distracted attention.

As for the media, when it’s not Rupert Moloch et al conducting a propaganda jamboree (sticking needles into a Biden effigy) they’re aiding and abetting crime by, at best, sleeping through it, at worst turning a blind eye to it. And there’s nothing like the profit motive to drug both writers and readers into ignoring real issues.

And now, the highest court in the land acting in concert with Texan shysters.

Someone proposed a “dick tax”. How about compulsory insurance for both guns… and dicks? On the lines of insurance for driving motor vehicles… Higher premiums in Texas to pay for paternity… or bounty hunters.

Expand full comment

Don't be surprised by SCOTUS-the Federalist Society which primes them, takes Dark money and has for years. Please read this piece by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI): https://medium.com/senator-sheldon-whitehouse/the-third-federalist-society-f8a3ff2e19fd

Expand full comment

I just wanted to add that my thanks to you, Barbara, for providing this treasure trove of information, somehow got lost when I drafted my reply, and I can't thank you enough.

On reviewing the information, what strikes me forcefully is the deeply self-destructive character of all this cart-before-horse activity.

Essentially, the enterprise is grounded in narcissistic perversion, but it is interesting how the beautiful abstraction of the closed legal mind can lend itself to such adventures in the undermining of justice and the real subversion of society.

The mind in question has no doors and no windows. In their place, marvelous representations of an ideal reality -- ideal from the point of view of the all-powerful.

[Like Benozzo Gozzoli's gorgeous frescoes on the walls of the Medici Palace in Florence...]

Expand full comment

It is a pity that this veritable goldmine of information should be buried in an obscure corner of HCR’s thread, in answer to a lackluster and rather snide comment of mine. It should be broadcast from the rooftops.

Of course, we still don’t know who owns us, but we’re getting warmer…

When I say “us”, I am of course referring here to the citizens of the United States (if such a term may be used for nonentities destined for serfdom). I fear, however, that in my own country, Britain, it may be even more difficult to trace dark money, including that provided by Putin’s people.

Perhaps the Supreme Court and courts of law throughout America should be offered copies of Flemish painter Gerard David’s horrific paintings, The Judgment of Cambyses and The Flaying of Sisamnes.

http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/a/corruption/judgment-of-cambyses-flaying-of-sisamnes.pdf

Note the appendix to this item, about reproductions of these paintings being sent to Russian judges… In that country, the judiciary is simply an arm of the corrupt executive. Like the “courts” of Vyshinsky in Moscow and Freisler in Berlin…

Plainly, our owners intend the US to become a pure oligarchy, like Russia today (except that no ruler since Ivan the Terrible has both controlled and owned as much of the country as the current Tsar). Maybe I was not so mistaken in expecting both regimes to develop a Tweedledum and Tweedledee relationship…

Expand full comment

To further the expansion of slavery, we fought the Mexican War in 1848, giving Texas its independence and ultimately statehood. It's time to give Texas back to Mexico, from whom we stole it, if they will take it back. If not, we can throw in Mississippi and Alabama as sweeteners to the deal.

Expand full comment

I agree. It seems that if we don't act NOW, we will lose the opportunity to save our democracy.

Expand full comment

I think we can use Afghanistan's collapse as an example: democracy fails if we don't fight for it.

Expand full comment

Well said Stuart! A time to action!

Expand full comment

Sing it, Brother! Absolutely on target.

Expand full comment

What do you think are the chances of the Democrats rising to the occasion? I’m not optimistic. May be time to get serious about supporting antifa.

Expand full comment

Yes Stuart: "There is no time to waste now as there is only one year left for the little democracy that we now know..."

Expand full comment

Just before I read your column, I posted on FB similar things about the anti-abortion law, and also this: As draconian as the TX anti-abortion law is, I am willing to bet that worse things are in the ammunition bin for Republicans. .....

....And if they get away with this law (designed to get around Roe v. Wade)...here's what could be next:

A) Apply the same vigilante method to voting. Yes...I think what would be next would be a law allowing anyone in the country who thinks someone in TX cheated in voting, voted "fraudulently," to sue. Yup...you a registered Democrat? Or just wearing a t-shirt with your favorite Democratic candidate, or have a yard sign on your property? Yup...wait for the next law that says if someone suspects you of cheating at voting, they can sue you. Hundreds of people, thousands of people, could sue every single registered Democrat at no cost to them. I know...sounds so hyperbolic, doesn't it?

And if the Supreme Court does nothing, what's next? Make same-sex actions illegal again in TX...with the same method. No more calling the police to do a night-time raid. Just let anyone in the country sue people thought to be having same-sex interactions and drive people into bankruptcy.

C) And you know what will be after this? Making not only practicing any religion other than Christianity against the law, but making NOT attending Church on Sundays against the law, since these are fake Christians who stir up other hateful, un-Christ-like Christians into radicalizing into the Christian Taliban.

I know A) and 😎 and C) sound over the top. But did you ever think anyone in the country would be allowed to sue anyone they think might have helped a woman consider abortion or get one...or even "intend" to help? Of course not. No one but frightened, cruel extremist fascist Republicans looking to take over the country (probably with the support of Putin) could think up this cruelty.

Will the Supreme Court step in and block this draconian anti-abortion law? I really don't know. I would have had no doubt a few years ago, but now...with THIS Supreme Court? I really don't know that they will block this or do anything about what I fear would happen next.

These Republican fascists have a multi-pronged approach that no one other than they would have imagined: Vigilantes suing Americans doing things the right-wing doesn't want; take over federal elections and as many state elections as possible by replacing Secretaries of State and State election boards; allow vigilantes to "observe" (intimidate) voters; empower the right's "brown shirts" - the Proud Boys, QAnon, and the dozens of self-styled right-wing "militias; intimidate school board members so that no Democrat will want to serve due to the threat of violence, and only Republicans will run for the seats. Education in this country, already damaged, will be savagely eviscerated - so helpful for fascists, as we watch Americans who should have been able to pass science know nothing about science, what it takes to become a scientist, have no respect for education or those who study and become experts, etc.

Trump, Flynn, and all of them belong in prison for their efforts to overthrow the government on all these levels. So far, little punishment has been handed out. The Putin-Trump-Flynn movement is growing huge and violent, just like Hitler's movement did.

Will Democrats, DOJ, FBI, CIA going to save our country? If so, they better do it fast.

Expand full comment

Solid analysis, and none of it seems "over the top." There is no "top" just as there is now no "bottom."

Expand full comment

TCinLA you nailed it. The US experiment in democracy is in free fall.

Expand full comment

I came to the same conclusions you did, and if not enough people become "awakened" to act in time, (and it looks pretty grim from here) this country's experiment in democracy will come to an end before the next generation after our children come of legal age. 💔

Expand full comment

Sadly, it will end with the 2022 elections if Trump, Flynn, Boebert, MTG, Cawthorn, McCarthy, Cruz, Giuliani, etc. aren’t arrested and if no one of significance stands up and tells those who think they are being patriots that they are being used to do the most unpatriotic thing possible and gets them to start really understanding that.

Expand full comment

Yes…they’re already brazenly pressing forward with the agenda they hoped they could easily set in place had they succeeded on 1/6. With NO consequences for previous actions, they have a green light to proceed.

Expand full comment

Yup!

Expand full comment

Scary analysis. More urgent than ever that the voting rights bills in Congress get passed with an exception to the filibuster.

Expand full comment

Sorry....don't know how the "cool" emoji replaced B), and B) being the section on vigilantes suing someone suspected of having gay sex. Didn't find a way to edit this...so hope this helps.

Expand full comment

We knew it was a typo. Doesn't detract from the point you made.

Expand full comment

The way to edit is yime and patience consuming: copy your piece, paste to word document or, in my case, on a Samsung phone "Notes" page. Edit on that page. Copy edited piece. Post in same HCR section. Delete original. Alot to do for a B we all aasumed!

Expand full comment

Oops, "time" not yime!

Expand full comment

I would add, we as Citizens need to get much more vocal because I don't count on any of the Institutions saving us.

Expand full comment

I was thinking about making a very detailed and even witty set of comments in regard to the Supreme Court’s not acting to stop the State of Texas’ almost complete ban on abortion but I have crumpled it up and dropped it into my computer's version of a wastebasket. Instead all I have to say is that any woman in the United States of America who votes, despite increasing restrictions on voting in many States, for any Republican candidate whatsoever should have her head examined.

Expand full comment

I will say rather than head examining, women will watch what men vote for any candidate supporting a fascist agenda. It’s good to know one’s “frenemies”. It was made sure that the US had only a day or so or “no war agenda”. My only personal head examining, Jack, is that I really never thought that even the worst of the democracy exterminators would sacrifice children and mothers so readily and seek to decimate the worth of women. That was I’ll advised.

Don’t talk to me about women having their heads examined. We are under attack. And we are not the enemy.

Expand full comment

All, regardless of gender, who support Republicans anywhere are the enemy.

Expand full comment

Understand your frustration. But consider this- the majority of white women voted for Trump- twice. A lot of white women have a lot invested in keeping things as they are. Not all sisters are allies.

Expand full comment

@Daniel Friedman, I suspect your comment about hating an equal number of women and men because you believe in gender equality is tongue in cheek. But hating people, even the people who support Republicans and these draconian laws, just keeps us diverted into the culture war, continues to persuade conservatives that there's no point in listening to us, and is also a waste of our precious emotional energy.

Spend that energy instead on actions that could actually help solve the problem, like lobbying your senators and representative on how to vote, and donating to an volunteering for organizations like Stacy Abrams' voting rights organization Fair Fight, and other organizations working hard to protect voting rights and elect Democrats and progressives, like Swing Left, Indivisible, and the whole list of grassroots organizations that's turned Arizona blue: https://bluetent.us/articles/campaigns-elections/here-are-the-progressive-organizations-that-helped-turn-ariz/.

Expand full comment

Womens March is another great one... they have an ongoing effort Womens March/United Vision.... doing some good work!

Expand full comment

Hear hear!

Expand full comment

I hate as many women as I do men. I believe in gender equality.

Expand full comment

Jack, I counter your comment by saying any human who votes... why would you restrict your entreaty to only women? Are men exempt from having their head examined if they vote for a Republican?

Let us be in this together, be deliberate with your words and they will have a greater effect.

Expand full comment

Of course, it applies to men as well. But the Texas law is specifically directed at abortions, a procedure women can choose, and that is why I address them.

Expand full comment

Actually recent polls show the divide between pro-choice (49%) and pro-life (47%) to be close to a tie.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx

For millions of voters abortion is the deciding issue come time to vote. Conservative Catholics and evangelical Christians, for example.

So clearly some will cheer this ruling while some will boo it.

Expand full comment

I disagree with the use of the term “pro-life.” It is actually “anti-choice.”

Expand full comment

I call them pro-controllers

Expand full comment

Respectfully, I challenge that source, H.A. I think it is closer to 59% pro-abortion access and pro-morning after meds across the nation. I cringe when given the fundamentalist Christian arguments because they are mandated to their congregations by authoritarian, almost always male ministers and priests. You can believe that the conservative coalition of Catholic Bishops was right there behind the All-Catholic, (one converted to Episcopalian) 5 lumps-on-a-log conservative justices.

Expand full comment

I’m inclined to agree. IMHO, there are a good many ministers of the faith who will hear Jesus declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Expand full comment

Some Conservative Catholics, some Evangelical Christians, some adherents to strict Islamic law (Taliban, ISIS, whomever is in charge in Iran or in Saudi Arabia), some Orthodox Jews, some ancient pagans worshipping a "fertility" goddess, all have had their minds warped by what they were taught to believe. When this extends over into politics, we are in trouble. In Ray Bradbury's book-burning novel, "Fahrenheit 451," I can't recall if they burned bibles too.

Expand full comment

Thanks for reminding me about that book. I think it may be time for me to reread it.

Expand full comment

I have been saying that for years... just do not understand it

Expand full comment

Thank you for laying out the full and profound horror of yesterday and last night's actions and of the collapse of the rule of law in Texas. If I lived there I'd be packing my bags. But 19 other states this year so far have instituted 97 restrictions on abortion. In just 7 months. Never mind the 25 states that have asked the Court to overturn Roe V Wade in the Mississippi case before it(and mind you, birth control methods that work are abortifacients, so we are now talking about forced breeding), and 20-something that have enacted voter suppression laws. "Nowhere to run to baby, nowehere to hide." Will someone please explain to the President that the filibuster is not worth the losses of democracy, the rule of law, and full human status and personhood for 51% of the population?

Expand full comment

With what the Supreme Court has done by doing nothing, you can bet your last dollar that in the next legislative sessions, every right wing controlled "red state" will enact these laws too. Now they have the blueprint.

Expand full comment

And the support of the Supreme Court in its “shadow docket.” I used to have a lot of respect for the SC. No more.

Expand full comment

I did some reading about the "shadow docket" It was hardly used until tRump. It's scary to me that SCOTUS can make decisions and not be required to hand down the vote/ruling. That's a whole peck of power!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Steve Bannon: "we will destroy the administrative state".

Expand full comment

Check out: Presumed Guilty: How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights Aug 24, 2021 by Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of UC Berkeley Law School.

Expand full comment

Nope.

Expand full comment

For background about SCOTUS, please read this piece by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse about the Federalist Society. (if you're not familiar w/the piece): https://medium.com/senator-sheldon-whitehouse/the-third-federalist-society-f8a3ff2e19fd

Expand full comment

Does the president have any control over filibuster? Isn’t that strictly a senate decision?

Expand full comment

The Senate decides senate rules, for including that one. The President could exert influence.

Expand full comment

Two Senators stand in the way of changing the rules Manchin and Sinema. Manchin is willing to at least go back to the person filibustering having to occupy the floor and talk as long as they can. I don't know about Sinema. They are both Democrats

Expand full comment

"Nowhere to run to baby, nowhere to hide."

Come East, Young Woman

Expand full comment

I am about as far East as you can get, and I am 67. Seems like you didn’t read my comment. With this court, the voter suppression laws being established at the speed of light in gerrymandered states, and the Republicans’ filibuster we have nowhere to run for the long haul. Get on the phone to the White House and tell the President that if he won’t let go of the filibuster he will not get to run again because the Republicans will take both houses in 2022. (Not that I want to see this heartless, clueless, overprivileged buddy of the fossil fuel cabal run again anyway.)

Expand full comment

I read your comment with interest, so interesting that I chose to Reply, rather than just be lazy and click on the "I Heart this Comment". My reply was a take off on Horace Greely's admonition to "Go West Young Man). As a journalist Greely was encouraging MEN to fulfil Manifest Destiny concerning America's expansion westward. WOMEN would do well for themselves to reverse that westward expansion and return to the original place so many began.

Expand full comment

Well Daniel, I began in Akron OH--not a place I want to be right now. Or I began in County Mayo during the Hunger--ditto. But I live now in Boston and I'll admit, when I'm in panic rather than thinking, I imagine fleeing farther East, to Ireland, which has changed so much and for the better in the last few years, or France, where I have many friends. But no, you don't give up your country till it's truly life or death.

Expand full comment

Question: what do you believe the president can do about the filibuster given a minimum of 2 Democrats refusing to consider changing it? It's Manchin and Sinema who will forever carry the responsibility for allowing Republicans to block any legislation that would address so much of the voter suppression legislation but it will be every American who will have to live with the consequences if the For the People Act is not passed by the U.S. Senate.

Expand full comment

"The court decided the case on its increasingly active “shadow docket,” a series of cases decided without full briefings or oral argument, often in the dead of night, without signed opinions."

We have now sunk to the depths plumbed by the Soviet Union during its darkest days. The Highest court meeting in darkness, making arbitrary rulings. Stalin would be proud.

Expand full comment

Viewed from Europe (and France, for my part), these developments are frightening. The guns law shows that this gun-crazy country can do even worse than we thought. And the abortion ban after 6 weeks, even in the case of rape or incest, is absolutely revolting, with no involvement from the Supreme Court! It's not only Democracy which is in danger, it's civilization itself! I came many many times to the USA, on holiday, I like the country, and I am appalled by what I see in the GOP and in some of the States.

Expand full comment

We moved to Spain almost two years ago. There are political issues here as well (also France), but to see what is happening in the country I was born in has actually made me ill. We've children and grandchildren there, but we will never go back. Even to visit.

Expand full comment

I understand. And I feel sorry for you. The problem is, as the USA are the most powerful country in the world, we cannot ignore what's happening there. Horrific scenario: if Trump would be elected again in 2024, it would be devastating, not only for the USA but for the whole world! I hope people will act to avoid that catastrophe (if I could vote in the USA I would!).

Expand full comment

The R’s have become so radical, they have left Trump behind.

Expand full comment

Your concern is moving, but in the best interests of yourself and your family, don't allow your concern for the US to leave you vulnerable. Act now to protect yourself from the wrath of these people currently consuming the US.

Expand full comment

Is world power possible without the delusions it takes to continue funding that influence (read, domination)? Historian Howard Zinn offered deep insights into "American Exceptionalism," as found in a recent broadcast on Alternative Radio on the subject. It is from the program's archives.

Expand full comment

Yes, world power is possible without the delusions it takes to continue funding that influence (read: 'domination').

Our delusion is that power is only possible by funding the world's largest military. Really delusional thought planted in The American Mind by the folks making the money on this delusion.

Military might is not real power. It only instigates more war. And more money sucked out of us by war profiteers.

Expand full comment

My first thought was "Is US world domination possible without popular delusions in this country." I ended up writing a more "polite" version since the notion of "oops, how could THAT have happened after all our exceptionalist and benevolent interventions" is so prevalent.

Lots to rigged systems to challenge. It's good to see you're working on it!

Expand full comment

This is all a horror show. I don't believe that the majority of Texans believe in intimidation at the voting booth, on the way to a health care provider or just in a grocery store. Imagine "Partisan Poll Observers" armed at a voting site. Armed and maskless and wearing a T-Shirt saying something like "Don't Vax Me". And then the "poll worker" asks your name and when you drove your friend to a clinic for reproductive counseling.

Texas: rise up. Toss these Brown Shirts out. Take back your state. The Supreme Court has abandoned you to totalitarian bigoted nutcases. It's up to Texans now. Vote these dangerous fools out. Take back your state.

Expand full comment

Oh i hope we can! This is one heck of a sh%&show, trainwreck, in a dumpster fire, with the godless at the helm. I really do fear that things will get worse, much worse, before they get better.

Expand full comment

I have been saying this for 6 years. And here we are.

Expand full comment

I can't imagine living someplace where people feel they need a gun for protection to go to the grocery store or CVS.

Expand full comment

Agreed. We live MA. If I saw someone in a Trader Joe's with a gun, I would run. I would call the police. Texas has reverted to the Wild West and has lost all sense of decency. Texans need to take back their state from the terrorists.

Expand full comment

So here is what I'm seeing.

The right wing is unbound. They are not tied to reason, to good governance, to religious structures (they use religious language, but they've twisted every word until it screams), to truth, to civility, to non-violence, to anything but madness based on lies, and lock-step unity there.

The left wing is bound to everything under the sun. Politeness. Polity. Non-violence. Law, which -- under this Supreme Court -- has pretty much lost it meaning. Inertia. Nit-picking each other to total paralysis. The customs of democracy, which requires we take years to bring terrorists to trial.

What I see is the right wing coming together. In madness. But they are a bloc.

What I see is the left wing waiting for something to happen.

Expand full comment

This is why you read all sorts of histories about right wing movements destroying left wing movements or even governments, and no stories of left wing movements or governments destroying right wing movements or governments.

Expand full comment

Russia, Spain, Portugal, Greece and many more...there are a lot of examples of the Left overturning the Right

Expand full comment

What the Russians got with Bolshevism was no improvement, and Stalinism is just totalitarianism, which is neither left nor right. and was arguably at least as bad as Nazism if not actually worse. Spain and Portugal weren't overthrows, they were wait-till-the-dictator-dies. Sorry to say for your country, Greece flips and flops back and forth and gets the worst of both.

Expand full comment

Not my country!

Expand full comment

My mistake, for which I apologize. I have several Greek friends who share your name.

Expand full comment

Indeed - mine derives from a Russian family background

Expand full comment

The aggressors always win. Goodness doesn’t prevail unless we fight for it.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

If you want to think that a totalitarian that's fine with killing 12 million of its citizens in the Great Leap Forward (while knocking the economy back to the Manchu level) and the crimes of the Cultural Revolution, plus the totalitarian oppression going on now under Xi is "left", well.... I guess you have a different definition than I do. Totalitarianism - Stalinist, Maoist or Hitlerist - is the same, disproving that there is a "left" or "right" but proving the continuum is circular.

My analysis stands.

Expand full comment

Yes, communists are generally considered "left." You analysis doesn't stand.

Expand full comment

All of which demonstrates that most "politrical scientists" are also found on the list of "otherwise-unemployables."

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Why is it the majority of women here are brilliant and too many of the men are intellectual embarrassments? Like you?

Expand full comment

You need to be getting your news from other or better or maybe just more sources. The left and its thousands of nonprofits and civic organizations has been busting its ass for years. Now including largescale organizing by the very young, who got the vote out in the swing states in 2018 and 2020. Don’t be dismissive of such long and hard labors.

Expand full comment

I'm talking about the right wing takeovers in "revolutionary" settings: Mussolini, Franco, Hitler, all the right wing military coups in South America, etc., etc.

The Left in America does indeed "bust its ass," and the result is what we have.

Expand full comment

It seems to me SCOTUS just sanctioned Civil War. The Republicans have been calling for it, and now making laws to make it easier, open carry, no license (here in IN too) now poke your nose in your neighbors business and make bank. This is ugly… and I don’t see courts or lawmakers defending what I would call sanity.

Expand full comment

SECESSION

Expand full comment

Seems like that’s the “easy” answer and won’t solve the rest of the problems set in motion. 1/6 made it clear what they’re after. A complete overthrow of our democracy. Now they’ve scrambled to suppress and control voting, openly arming citizens and making a practice of turning in your neighbors private business for money. How do you suppose they will determine the truth of these allegations? I’m going to make a wild guess and say it depends on how the neighbor fits in their plan. These are increasingly dangerous times.

Expand full comment

I continue (and now increasingly) like the idea of New York (and a few other states, yet to be identified) to join up with Canada, There's be lots of money to be made and lots of places to visit.

Expand full comment

They may not want us.

Expand full comment

EVERYBODY wants us! And to comfort your concerns, we just sweeten the pot with some of those other "likeable" States. In my opinion Vermont would fit in the package. (30 years' Wall Street gives me some idea of deal-making, but we can always check with Sandy Lewis, when he's around.)

Expand full comment

Tell me how to maintain any optimism in this environment, I’m heartbroken 💔

Expand full comment

Well, from an historical point of view, comparing this constitutional republic with the last one that lasted any amount of time (Rome), we are falling for the same reasons they did (despite a majority of Romans wanting to keep the Republic) - you get individuals and groups who violate the norms and do not pay a price, the norms are destroyed, and with that, the real system that makes a consitutional republic work: the choice of everyone to follow the rules and traditions because doing so makes things work.

Looking at things in the long term, there really is few grounds for optimism. As has been pointed out by another contributor, the Republicans are willing to act and the Democrats aren't.

Expand full comment

I'm done with optimism. Try rage.

Expand full comment

It takes both. It takes optimism, hope, clear vision, and resolve to constructively channel rage to effect change.

Expand full comment

Optimism got us here. I have hope, no one fights without it. But no optimism. I’m not going to lie to myself or anyone else. Too much is at stake.

Expand full comment

Ellie, THANK YOU for creating the Lysistrata Movement!!! I love how brilliant, empowering and creative it is / you are! We urgently need this!!! Fern McBride mentioned it in her comment today. ♥️🙏🏻🙏🏾🙏♥️

Expand full comment

My dear, thank you, and sorry to disappoint you, but Fern's comment was made in humor.

Expand full comment

Heartbroken and afraid for my state and country….there are people of integrity and courage in Texas…Beto continues his campaign to register voters for 2022 but going against the “great white, evangelical, gun toting, non vaccinated wave” seems almost hopeless right now. I can’t completely say I’m hopeless….that is one thing this optimist has never said….but next week, who knows….?

Expand full comment

Given the bent of the RW R gun carriers in TX, I could easily fear for his life...

Expand full comment

I take optimism from the fact that Sonia Sotomayor grew up in the same part of The Bronx as I did, so I know what she is made of. There are others in government who have the courage necessary to take this on. We, as citizens, need to get behind them, let them know now is the time to take the fight to these fascists. We can win only if we fight.

If not, I predict that Justice Sotomayer will be back in NYC, where we will be on guard against The Regime.

Expand full comment

This is a profoundly disturbing development. By what tortured reasoning can SCOTUS support a law that enables vigilantism? And is their refusal to step in an indication they would rule against challenges to the law? Or is this some legalistic pussyfooting because they were asked to "stay" rather than rule on the law? What is the logic here?

I think this is a crisis for SCOTUS and that the 3 liberal justices should stage a walk out. Refuse to participate in these clearly unconstitutional rulings. Call into question the functioning and make up of the court. Dramatize the situation in a way that can't be ignored. This is undermining our country. I remember being unable to believe the decision in Bush v Gore. But because Gore was gracious in the face of an unfair ruling, no violence ensued. This ruling invites violence and dynamites the foundation of law that is supposed to create a civilized nation.

Expand full comment

Yes, we need to fight like hell, while we still can.

Expand full comment

Convict Cavanaugh, get him off the court.

Expand full comment

New laws of Texas incentivizing abortion bounty hunters armed with handguns is madness, and I dread the first test case in court. So what to do until this insane law can be overturned?

Contraceptives? Are they related to abortion? Although facts don't particularly matter. SB8 is all about allegations and intimidation at the point of a gun with the threat of a long, drawn out legal expense in a kangaroo court system.

Time for Texas women to take charge and withhold sex. Lysistrata called for a sex strike by her fellow women in ancient Greece to stop a war.

https://timeline.com/for-women-absence-can-be-power-as-this-play-from-ancient-greece-shows-cdf97a948f09

Expand full comment

Thanks for this link, Ellie! If only. "She talks of 'unassuming' wives, 'forgotten in quiet,' who are called upon to sit by and watch as men destroy their world. 'How wretchedly everything still was progressing,' she says, 'by listening dumbly the day long to you.'

It’s time for women to take over."

Expand full comment

Agree in principle, but don't forget- there are a LOT of white women invested in white supremacy. Majorities of white women voted for Trump- twice. Not all sisters are allies.

Expand full comment

Smart women.

Expand full comment

I was looking for your response along with a few others, Lynell. Really did not think it would come to this. But so be it. Brava!

Expand full comment

Here is the tragedy.

Women have no rights in this.

If you cannot plan your family, you have no control of your life.

These anti-abortion laws are aiming for absolute control - NO EXCEPTION for rape, incest, risk to life of the mother. And no allowances for spontaneous miscarriage.

(Remember the laws mandating funerals for fetal remains?)

They are erecting barriers, delays, unnecessary expense; and the attack has been if they could not take away the right, they would take away the access.

In the 1960s and 1970s, the concern was not to go back to the days of coat hangers - unsafe illegal abortions that killed people.

These new laws do nothing to address the need for options - just the access to all health care procedures.

So girls and women will have their autonomy stripped away.

They will have no recourse if they are forcibly impregnated.

Seriously, young girls could be forced to become mothers instead of completing their education and pursuing a chosen career based on their potential. Women could be eliminated from business positions by competitors. All of society would be deprived of female brilliance and contributions.

Expand full comment

And then repubs can whine about and restrict social services for women forced to bear children they cannot afford.

Expand full comment

Of course they will-they always have whined about helping pretty much ANYONE.

Expand full comment

Women have EVERY right in this. Do not be deceived by what the purpose is…this move is only to cancel the might of women in this country. Why do you think it’s happening on our shores? Do not be shrouded.

Expand full comment

Might this be happening to delay addressing climate chaos and economic disparities? Isn't abortion one of the riddles thrown at unsuspecting citizens to impose arguments, diversions and distractions? The appeal to "morality and justice" in a failed political system appears to be working.

There's reason, I believe, to suspect this happens in order to to distract women from an instinctive struggle for economic fairness, corralling women and men into a reproductive rights ghetto.

Expand full comment

I believe your last sentence is the point. God forbid we should have more Hillary Clintons or Angela Merkels in the world. Exactly what the Texas GOP and ISIS share. Their intense fear of being ruled by smart women.

Expand full comment

The conservative women supporting this restriction are big part of the problem. Their ministers have them convinced its essential to Christianity in saving the lives of millions of babies. Their statistics are so outlandish! It’d have to be every person in the world being pregnant living in Texas! They fight tooth and nail to help control abortion rights. They’ve failed to see how it’s controlling women and depleting healthcare for women in Texas. My goal is to leave, like so many doctors already have.

Expand full comment

I find it funny (not) that these women are probably the ones screaming my body my choice over mask/vaccine mandates.

Expand full comment

I will get in the face of every “conservative” stepford, handmaid woman that confronts me. My grandmother who was a farm woman in the Midwest, as solid and conservative as was norm, yet wild and free, would literally kick these “conservative women” to the curb.

This is us not about being conservative. This is about being subservient to white male dominance and satisfied to be quiet and richly rewarded.

I spit on it.

Expand full comment

"They’ve failed to see..."

Once you have signed on for Fascism, it's not a oversight that you "fail to see" reality.

Expand full comment

Vasectomies for men. (I know, not realistic but...)

Expand full comment

Or some other “-ectomy.”

Expand full comment

reverse engineer Handmaid's Tale...vasectomies for all except those chosen as roving sperm banks...

Expand full comment

Thanks Ellie - was going to post the same. Surely some of these "gentlemen" have wives - or are they all so cowed, or have swallowed the Kool Aid of the Rethuglicans?

Expand full comment

They think themselves clever courtesans. When really they have the self worth of a chambermaid.

Expand full comment

This is so far the only logical suggestion that I am responding to, Ellie. Thank you for link. I was looking for mine a half hour ago. This is at the other end of handmaid strategy. Which I detest.

When women think with their worth, correct action happens.

As it turns out, this will be a woman’s war to wage. Organize continues. As it always has. Thinking and holding close female icons in my life today.

Expand full comment

All forms of birth control that work are abortifacients. The right has been preparing to include them in the overturning of Roe v Wade for decades.

Expand full comment

Abortifacients is the word I was looking for. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Yes Ellie, Lysistrata came to my mind also.

Expand full comment

Is the morning after pill still available and is it safe for regular use?

Expand full comment

Someone else will have to come up with the medical term, but it seems that once sperm meets egg, it’s all over. Any interference could be construed as intent to have an abortion—with the absurd legal consequences directed against any abettors and the life consequences directed against the woman or girl.

Expand full comment

Yes, I only know about NH where it's available OTC in most pharmacies. Lucky women with access to care could also have a copper IUD inserted to prevent implantation, another kind of emergency contraception. But that takes access, which is its own issue, as well as awareness.

Expand full comment

There are really good IUD's which solve a stack of problems, but you would have to go interstate to get one fitted (assuming you were in texas).

Expand full comment

It’s an abortifacient.

Expand full comment

As far as contraceptives, there are plenty out there who are against them and could well start for that push. Will it succeed? I don't know.

Expand full comment

We Texans need help from Congress. Countless good people, including my own representative in the Texas House, have tried to stop these terrible bills, and have introduced bills we actually need here, but the Texas Taliban are determined to stop any measure that would help everyone else at the expense of dark money interests. Next up in the Texas Legislature: redistricting. God help us.

Expand full comment

The “Texas Taliban” is a great descriptor. Follow the Republican playbook and use it until it sticks.

Expand full comment

Bumper stickers and t-shirts that read on the front "Save US (paired with symbol for female) from the Texas Taliban!" ; on the back an image of a calendar being flippd back to the Dark Ages. The "US" could stand for us women and girls but also the United States.

Expand full comment

Are there enough Texans who are outraged and will vote out the Texas Taliban? I am literally at a loss for words for what is happening there, and frightened that this mindset will spread.

Expand full comment

Cathy, I do not think these laws are representative of the way a majority of Texans think, but I could be wrong. Certainly polling tells us that a majority do not agree with these bills, nor do they think these bills are priorities. In other words, it does not look to me as if Texans have elected these office-holders to do this particular work. Frankly, most people would rather the Lege address our position in the national electric grid and the way utility companies profit off of us when the electric grid goes down during two weeks of sub-freezing temperatures. By the way, to speak to your point about the mindset spreading, it is being carefully planned all over the country. It has been manufactured and carefully cultivated nationally. The current Texas legislative lunacy is not indigenous, although, it plays on themes that are near and dear to white Texas. Laws like the current awful ones were non-starters two years ago. Let that be a warning.

Expand full comment

The furor I have been feeling from last night and today is so immense I hope I do not have a heart attack. We women, are the majority in this country but we are always marginalized. Why? Because men are quite frankly, afraid of us. They seem to forget that they would not be on this earth if a woman hadn’t carried them to full birth. In fact, many of these women may have wanted to get abortions but they couldn’t. Perhaps there were enough mothers and sons who never bonded and that might be why these bastards feel the need to “control” women. But this isn’t medieval times. Women have progressed exponentially in all fields. We are not silent. We are loud and demanding. We have to fight with every tooth and nail to charge back.

Our SCOTUS is tainted in red blood. Biden must expand the court and Breyer must be replaced. Do it by executive order. Do it without the Senate’s approval so that Mitch can't get his hands on anything. Take that power away from him. Just do SOMETHING!

I honestly feel like Lorena Bobbitt was right.

Expand full comment

Marlene, you survived 4 years of the iDJT45. We need every single person in this fight so please, please keep yourself healthy and try to limit your stress. There are 50 states and only a few bullies get all the attention. 🥰

Expand full comment

Marlene, turn your stress to action—a great stress reliever. In those 50 gerrymandered states there are 75 million Trump voters. That’s not a few bullies.

Expand full comment

I have Mary, for 50+years been an active member pushing for abortions.

Expand full comment

Are you really trying to get more jobs for reconstructive surgeons? <grin>

Expand full comment

Unless we pass legislation to sue anyone trying to get a man to the surgeon to sew it back on! 😝

Expand full comment

When it comes to this legislation from Texas, I will agree, Marlene. Cut it off at the dick of it.

Expand full comment