How can anyone say “but I’m not voting for the hatred, racism, etc - just the tax cuts and judges” not understand that a vote for the latter is also a vote for the former?
How can anyone say “but I’m not voting for the hatred, racism, etc - just the tax cuts and judges” not understand that a vote for the latter is also a vote for the former?
How can anyone say “but I’m not voting for the hatred, racism, etc - just the tax cuts and judges” not understand that a vote for the latter is also a vote for the former?
He understood it just fine. That was his attempt at rationalizing his vote. It didn’t work.