Also not a lawyer, pts, but I don't see why the 11th Circuit can't pull her off the case for the counter-legal rulings she's made. I'll go read the Vance article, and maybe then I'll see what I'm missing.
Also not a lawyer, pts, but I don't see why the 11th Circuit can't pull her off the case for the counter-legal rulings she's made. I'll go read the Vance article, and maybe then I'll see what I'm missing.
A good question that's way above my pay grade; I don't know for sure but don't think an appeals court can act sua sponte (if that's the correct use of that term), that is, without having received some sort of formal request or appeal. Would be great to hear from a qualified lawyer on this, and also on how Jack Smith might go about finding out whether or how Judge Cannon may have been improperly advised.
Also not a lawyer, pts, but I don't see why the 11th Circuit can't pull her off the case for the counter-legal rulings she's made. I'll go read the Vance article, and maybe then I'll see what I'm missing.
A good question that's way above my pay grade; I don't know for sure but don't think an appeals court can act sua sponte (if that's the correct use of that term), that is, without having received some sort of formal request or appeal. Would be great to hear from a qualified lawyer on this, and also on how Jack Smith might go about finding out whether or how Judge Cannon may have been improperly advised.
I think su esponte is correct, pts, but what do I know of Latin or law?