112 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Mike S's avatar

Carol,

Trump is one example of what is truly amiss with America. A hardened and successful criminal for all of his adult life with documented crimes (not renting any of his rental properties to black people, a federal crime, not paying taxes in NY or in the US, 6 bankruptcies, and more).

There are two main reasons Trump is not in jail:

1. He is rich.

2. He is white.

In America, if you are rich and you are white, it has been, since the founding of our country, totally OK to do whatever you want, including, enslaving an entire people, whipping someone to death, slandering people, selling a person's offspring for money, paying no federal tax for years, and attempting to overthrow a legitimate election.

The free pass, for rich white men, is one of the very fundamental flaws in the American fabric.

Look up any statistic on any prison. The vast, vast majority of residents are black and latino.

Why? Because blacks and latino's are more criminal than whites?

Not hardly.

Expand full comment
Seth's avatar

Very wealthy criminals buy the best accountants and lawyers to cover their tracks and manipulate the system. With Georgia TFG couldn’t restrain himself and made the call never suspecting a Republican official would record the call. He didn’t have his fixer enabler Michael Cohen to do the dirty work. Can Houdini slip from the handcuffs of a Fulton County indictment?

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

I profoundly hope not. I hope he is indicted, tried, and convicted. After Napoleon was such an awful problem for France, he was exiled to Elba. I wish tfg could be exiled to some remote place with no internet or cell service. His defense is always, “They’re picking on me. It’s not fair.” That excuse is not acceptable for a 12 yr. old boy. Why should tRump get away it? His base needs to understand that he despises them and just uses them.

Expand full comment
Patricia Andrews (WA)'s avatar

Interesting comment. Trump brings to my mind an old (original) Star Trek episode. The planet explored in that episode kept having impossible, illogical events happening the the landing team. Final conclusion? The planet was inhabited by an immature, narcissistic “god-lette”. This (essentially) spoiled brat had been exiled there by adult “gods” for punishment and hopefully reform. Apparently they were unsuccessful! Sound familiar?

Expand full comment
Maggie's avatar

Frankly, reform is unattainable. Just as "bipartisanship" is with Republicans & here we go again with the attempt to actually pass something that resembles maybe not control of guns maybe, possibly, a few little minor concessions from the Rs. I'm sorry, for being so pessimistic, but how many years has it already been since there were ANY concessions from them? The entire Charlie Brown/Lucy scenario keeps playing over & over.

Expand full comment
AnnieNY's avatar

I agree, Jenn. I compare his behavior to a grade school child who whines "Not fair!!" when he loses at pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey at a birthday party.

Expand full comment
Sharon Stearley's avatar

Or loses at golf when he cheats!

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Hope Lindsay's avatar

I vote for wherever Komodo dragons live!

Expand full comment
Maggie's avatar

NOPE! Nowhere that there are living & breathing animals. Ever notice how uninterested the entire DJT family is with living animals? The only interaction with other species is killing them. Not sure where he could be "put" that would mean safety for others (humans or other species)!

Expand full comment
Patricia Andrews (WA)'s avatar

Poor dragons! Really?

Expand full comment
Bert's avatar

That’s right, but his base (the GOP) are paying the freight on his legal woes.

For Trump and his family it’s a grift that’s how they make there living and they are great at it. His base is the mark Gym Gordon and the rest are just along for the money

Expand full comment
Loree Byers's avatar

Jordan is not a mark, he's a co- conspirator.

Expand full comment
Loree Byers's avatar

Guantanamo without internet.

Expand full comment
Peter Burnett's avatar

Elba was far too close to the mainland and within sight of the island of Napoleon's birth. A very expensive mistake. Saint Helena, in the middle of the South Atlantic was the final choice.

The main thing is to make the world safe for its inhabitants by whatever means it takes to remove this man, his henchmen and his would-be successors-in-crime, from circulation.

At least he could then spend the rest of his days content in the knowledge that, like Napoleon, he is seen as a uniquely important menace and is being treated accordingly. Thus, vanity will be satisfied.

Expand full comment
FERN MCBRIDE (NYC)'s avatar

Peter, You came up with an elegant solution, at least in your words. Can you imagine Trump thinking as you do? Give it 5 seconds. Next question, where will he hold his rallies?

Expand full comment
Peter Burnett's avatar

Answers:

1. Thinking? Is that what you call the processes that take place under that skull? No, those are soothing thoughts that jailers can feed him, along with images from rallies and from Mar a Lago...

2. Cfr. Loree Byers

Having said that, prayers for him and for all like him. Don't let's give in to hatred for the man however much horror we may feel for his words and deeds.

To hate him and those whose minds he has poisoned is to join with them in drinking his filth and delusions. That is how evil comes to stain the innocent, and if we attend to the lessons of history, it will be plain that these stains, these mind poisons, remain ingrained in human communities for centuries... for millennia.

Expand full comment
Dave Dalton's avatar

Laws are written in language that allows learned attorneys to reverse the intent of the law on its face by parsing the language into pretzel ( Hence Steely Dan) logic

Juries become inexpert linguistic interpreters, ( not of their own choosing) in attempts to arrive at the truth

“The Truth is not in us”

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

Seth Wouldn’t it be ironic if Trump, accustomed to liar and lawyer up, were brought to justice by a Fulton County district attorney. Reminds me of Al Capone, whose murderous career was ended by a tax fraud conviction.

Expand full comment
Katherine Boyd's avatar

And one who’s female AND Black.

Expand full comment
Nancy Fleming's avatar

Talk about poetic justice!

Expand full comment
Katherine Boyd's avatar

And she is not cowed by him or his family. Neither is Letitia James, NY State’s AG, (another Black woman) who’s going after him in a civil suit for tax fraud.

Expand full comment
Nancy Fleming's avatar

Let's hope that they both prevail. He is a vile criminal, with absolutely no redeeming qualities. The tide needs to turn on all of these betrayers - at least those who can be reached in the American courts.

Expand full comment
Christy's avatar

They have so much experience at being strong and resilient. I am not surprised to see them leading us in power to rise up against fascism!

https://www.oprahdaily.com/entertainment/tv-movies/a40011988/the-culture-is-black-women-msnbc-exclusive-clip/

Expand full comment
Katherine Boyd's avatar

Thanks, I’ll check out this new series. Looks really interesting!

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

The perfect scheme, in my opinion!

Expand full comment
Loree Byers's avatar

I hope they're looking hard a RICOing tfg and the rest of his rabid litter.

Expand full comment
Deborah Ruf's avatar

Some Republicans, most notably, Tom Cotton, are trying to introduce legislation that would end fair representation by an attorney even when you can't personally afford one. That sure fits into the system these rich white guys are working to strengthen.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

He’s McConnell in a different but in a same colored hoodie

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

He's actually more intentionally evil. He looks for the evil angle in whatever he does. McConnell will play with evil, but it isn't his go-to first choice, as it is for The Guy Who Should Have Been Fragged In Iraq.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Yes, just add a pencil mustache under his nose and lo and behold…da Füehrer!

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

is this the recent Supreme Court decision?

Expand full comment
Nancy Fleming's avatar

If Fani Willis's special grand jury does not recommend empaneling a grand jury that can find grounds to indict TFG, it will not be due to Willis being corrupt. She is a diligent, intelligent lioness, and she calmly strategizes ensnaring criminals. Unlike TFG, even if he's tried and convicted of attempting to overturn Georgia's 2020 presidential election, Willis will not recommend the death penalty, as TFG would have liked to do with Hillary. In this case, cronyism and wealth will not dictate the outcome.

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

I say, when TFG is tried and convicted, let’s build him his forever home on the southern border out of those BIG BEAUTIFUL WALL sections.

Expand full comment
Nancy Fleming's avatar

Oh, that would make me so happy! After all the criticism of Merrick Garland's apparent lack of attention of TFG's criminal behavior, it's heartening to see that his critics were apparently misguided, and the thought that the criminal might face consequences would be sublime.

Expand full comment
MisTBlu's avatar

Except for Roy Cohn, Trump hasn't had the "best" lawyers or accountants. His reputation for not paying his bills makes that impossible.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

Hopefully not.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

I would add, another protective factor is that he's male. It's no accident that Martha Stewart ended up in jail, while so many rich white men who committed much worse crimes skated prosecution.

Expand full comment
Pat Malarkey's avatar

And that Nancy Pelosi has been refused communion but President Biden has not been refused communion.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

Good point. You can't let those women get too uppity! Why they might expect to be treated as equals and allowed to be priests!

Expand full comment
Betsy Dillon's avatar

Wish I could quadruple ❤️ this. Don’t get me started on the Catholic Church.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

I'm with you.

Expand full comment
Susan Lorraine Knox's avatar

We need a whole separate blog for that.

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

Pat The Pope clearly granted Biden the right to communion despite his view on abolition. One of America’s conservative bishops has ignored the Pope in his diatribe against Pelosi. Meanwhile, numerous American dioceses have declared bankruptcy because of the massive legal payments for the long-hidden charges of church folks doing unthinkable things to boys.

It seems to me that the only ‘soul’ in the Catholic Church that is sacrosanct is filet of sole. Now the Southern Baptist Church is unraveling over exposure of church scandals.

Holy, holy, and all that jazz.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

And this week the Pope promoted the Archbishop of San Diego to Cardinal, very pointedly passing over the Archbishop of San Francisco.

Expand full comment
Danielle (NM)'s avatar

New Mexico ended up with more than her share of pedophile priests because problem priests were sent to the Servants of the Paraclete retreat in the Jemez Mountains by dioceses from all over the country. Once pronounced “cured”, they were sent to parishes throughout New Mexico instead of back to their original states. The Archdiocese of Santa Fe has declared bankruptcy and is forced to sell off church property.

Expand full comment
Pat Malarkey's avatar

Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, had the same problem. We were in the Allentown Diocese when I was growing up and it's where the "bad" priests went for punishment.

Expand full comment
Pat Malarkey's avatar

Agreed. My point is that there's a mixed message going on and that men seem to get a pass when women don't.

And, if the Pope can be likened to the legislative branch, the Bishop of San Francisco can be likened to SCOTUS. Biden gets a pass on the Federal level; Pelosi gets sanctioned at the state level.

Expand full comment
Bruce Sellers (Georgia, USA)'s avatar

The priest in San Francisco that refused Pelosi communion was passed over by the Pope for a promotion he'd been hoping for. The Pope elevated someone else. Touché...

Biden goes to a Catholic church in DC with a different priest, and I seem to remember the Pope expressly did not allow communion to be withheld from Biden.

Expand full comment
Carol Stanton (FL)'s avatar

Hi Bruce, I think what the Pope said was intended for all the U.S. Bishops...as in, "don`t weaponize or politicize the Eucharist." If I remember correctly, it was a Bishop/ or priest in Connecticut that was threatening to withold communion but the DC Archbishop Wilton Gregory said Pres.. Biden could receive anytime in DC! Pelosi is a devout Catholic, as is Biden. At a time when the US Bishops could be standing strong for the real human issues and crises of our world they are doing this political s#*t ( sorry Jesus!!).

Expand full comment
Bruce Sellers (Georgia, USA)'s avatar

Thanks for clarifying with more specifics I was fuzzy on. I remember the Pope's statement and couldn't understand how this priest in SF could get away with denying Pelosi communion. The priest in SF is extremely conservative, apparently, but I'm glad the Pope passed over him with promotions of others. Pelosi has visited the Pope at the Vatican, so I can't see why he hasn't come down harder on the priest in SF.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

Promoting a guy who is not only junior but liberal was "putting the hammer down" big-time in that bunch.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

Not only did the Pope promote someone else, he promoted the Archbishop of San Diego, a prominent liberal who was JUNIOR to the Archbishop of San Francisco.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Can’t ❤️ this but this SF priest is extremely controversial and always has been. Time for him to be set out to pasture.

Expand full comment
Carol Stanton (FL)'s avatar

Hhi Marlene, Yes, he is one of the "gang" of USBishops who are anti- Francis and also politically in bed with the ultra right wing, in all its forms. There are a few progressive Bishops ( recent made Cardinal one of them) who are trying to find ways to lessen the gap between these guys and less partisan Bishops-- but the U.S. Conference of Bishops, at this moment, is as divided as our country. It is so discouraging and so counterproductive!!! At a time when the church is trying to keep "butts on the pews" these guys are trying to throw out some of their most publically loyal practitioners!!! They are also being "backed" by ultra conservative, big money Catholics--a situation not unlike the strangle hold lobbyists have on our Congresspersons and probably intimately connected to certain conservative political agendae.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Oh yes, Carol, I am fully aware of that information. The Vatican has been in bed with the Pro-Rape Party for many many years. Evidenced by all of the boys and girls who were violated at a very young age by a priest. Quite frankly, priests and nuns who swear to a lifetime of celibacy, is very unnatural. Deprives these sick people of the pleasures of having a “normal” relationship. Those who believe in the Catholic faith should really demand their leaders lighten up. I bet they would gain more of a following unlike what we are seeing today, which is people leaving in droves.

Expand full comment
Pat Malarkey's avatar

Agreed, but that wasn't my point.

Expand full comment
Terry Nicholetti's avatar

I'm confused. Pope Francis asked the bishops not to make Eucharist a political tool. "In November, the bishops approved a new document that fell short of denying the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians." So how can the archbishop deny Speaker Pelosi communion?

https://www.newsweek.com/pelosi-denied-communion-bishop-pope-eucharist-1708843

Expand full comment
Pat Malarkey's avatar

I agree, but that's not the point I was trying to make.

It's kind of like federal vs. state here in the US. The feds - AKA Pope Francis - gave President Biden a "pass," but the state authority - AKA Bishop Salvatore - refuses to allow communion for Speaker Pelosi.

I have no idea what happens when either walks up the aisle for communion and the priest says, "Body of Christ."

I just know that President Biden is a man and Speaker Pelosi is a woman and it just seems wrong to me that their treatment is different.

Expand full comment
Terry Nicholetti's avatar

I agree that it's wrong that their treatment is different. And one can find many many examples of this inequity in the church of my childhood. It just seems that in this particular situation it was more a question of geography (who is in charge in CA vs DE) and I wondered how an archbishop could defy both the pope and the council of bishops. Sigh...

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

Chaplain The Catholic Church on abortion seems akin to the Democratic Party on almost everything. Whatever the boss man says, there are many mice who munch their own cheese. Progressives, moderates, and coal-crunching Munchin.

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

sorta like states' rights?

Expand full comment
AnnieNY's avatar

That bishop got in trouble for that stance. *shrug* It IS California, you know... ;)

Expand full comment
kdsherpa's avatar

Wasn't he initially refused communion, but that was overridden by (the Pope?)

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

And, not having money isn't always necessary, since many white men with not much money are given a pass for egregious crimes and behaviors a lot of the rest of us would end up being outcasts or in prison for. A good example is those young men who have raped women but are given a slap on the wrist because a criminal record would "stain their futures".

Expand full comment
Kathleen Allen's avatar

Key word: S.T.A.I.N. ....

Expand full comment
Danielle (NM)'s avatar

Although many of them come from families with money.

Expand full comment
Paula's avatar

3. He is male.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

True on the face of it, Martha Stewart did time.

Expand full comment
Gayle Cureton's avatar

White but not male.

Expand full comment
Annie D Stratton's avatar

So... Dave got the point.

Expand full comment
Patricia Andrews (WA)'s avatar

????????????

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

Dave Martha, as a woman, was treated differently than a man. However, Martha (who looks great at 80) dug her own hole because of arrogance. She professionally had knowledge of stock shenanigans. She had the opportunity to say mea culpa, I was unaware, and would have gotten a slap on the wrist. Instead, she told the prosecutor to stuff it and insisted on a trial.

Net net: Martha was treated differently than some male stock manipulators. But Martha’s arrogance sent her to the slammer.

Expand full comment
Barbara Mullen's avatar

Mitch McConnell and the extreme politicization of our Court system. I always check the Party of a presiding Judge in important court cases.

Here is an article from 2020. “McConnell reaches milestone on judges by filling final Circuit Court vacancy. “When we depart this chamber today, there will not be a single Circuit Court vacancy anywhere in the nation for the first time in at least 40 years,” McConnell said. McConnell took over the Senate in January 2015 and held votes on just two Circuit Court judges during Obama's last two years in office. And McConnell has made confirming judges central to his tenure as majority leader. By Leigh Ann Caldwell and Sahil Kapur

Also

“McConnell was exposed to the machinations of judicial appointments early in his career, when he worked for Marlow Cook, a U.S. senator from Kentucky who sat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. During his time as a staffer for Cook, McConnell saw two of President Richard Nixon’s Supreme Court nominees rejected.

“It was in those years that McConnell really came to understand the importance, the centrality of judicial nominations in our political system, both the Supreme Court nominations and also … federal lower-court nominations,” Alec MacGillis, a ProPublica reporter and author of The Cynic: The Political Education of Mitch McConnell, told FRONTLINE in 2019.

And McConnell's coup of his lifetime was in stacking the Supreme Court. Then to our extreme detriment it appears as if Garland is living in some sort of ivory tower way up in the clouds where lady justice still prevails.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I loathe McConnell and mute him every time he makes one of his asinine pronouncements. He has ruined the court system and the Supreme Court is nothing now, but a majority of Federalist Society judges who continue to undermine everything that we have worked so long to achieve. As for Garland, I think he runs a very tight ship and that there is much more going on than the public knows at the moment.

Expand full comment
Bruce Sellers (Georgia, USA)'s avatar

Same here. I think McConnell has done more to destroy democracy in this country than any one individual, even the Big Orange Menace. Everything McConnell does and says is done with ulterior motives. He's a slimy bastard.

Case in point...delay action...keep kicking that can down the road...wait till it all subsides and blows over...tout a couple of ineffective actions without addressing the MAIN one...

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1531685943698235393?email=305966b8e78a335d0b5d80ac058692cc51cb7b0b&emaila=a2ef2d482568704f718104bd097a1ccd&emailb=cd37b32ca9df18b298251a2dd117111edc08348b66a4111148c3ba0c3c1cd482&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=06.01.22%20KB%20-%20The%20Hill%20-%20Morning%20Report&utm_term=Morning%20Report

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

You can practically see the slime dripping off him.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Can’t ❤️ again (sigh) but your last sentence perfectly describes him.

Expand full comment
Mim Eisenberg (NYer now in GA)'s avatar

When the heart button doesn’t turn red, refresh your page and it should then show it’s red. If not, just click on it again, and it should turn red. You may have to scroll a little to find it.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Thanks, Mimi but I am on my mobile and there is no “refresh” button that I know of. I just keep going in and out to keep up. Wish Substack would work on this issue. Seems like I only experience it on HRC’s page. 🙄

Expand full comment
Bruce Sellers (Georgia, USA)'s avatar

On my PC if I click on the "heart" button and then just wait, sometimes several minutes, and it will eventually register. It just takes it some time sometimes. I usually don't have any trouble on my phone, but I tend to not read LFAA on it because of the spacing it uses for comments.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Bruce, that does sometimes happen but if I am on it for awhile, the page suddenly “jumps” and I can’t ❤️ anymore. So frustrating…

Expand full comment
Mim Eisenberg (NYer now in GA)'s avatar

It happens to me on every Substack page.

Mim

Expand full comment
Judith Swink (CA)'s avatar

On another hand, there have been a number of tfg-appointed judges who have ruled fairly on cases of particular interest to tfg and Republicans.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I am talking mainly about the Supreme Court here.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

You should thus be very surprised then, to learn that most of the decisions in the past year against the Trumpers in the investigations have been made by Trump-appointed judges. And overall, more Trump-appointees have ruled against than for, though the Trump appointees in the Appeals Courts have about a 50-50 record.

Expand full comment
Barbara Mullen's avatar

I have noticed that as well. However, it is that other 50% that rule according to Party lines that is causing problems. The sheer number of McConnell appointed persons in the Judiciary is staggering. While people were distracted McConnell set out to control the 3rd Branch of Government.

Expand full comment
David Holzman's avatar

Trust’ at the Supreme Court? The court’s self-destruction continues.

By Jennifer Rubin

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/01/supreme-court-investigation-clerks-cellphones/

Expand full comment
Kathleen Allen's avatar

Say it Mike!!!

Expand full comment
Mike S's avatar

Trump is just one example of the fundamental flaw. But, he is an excellent example to be sure Kathleen.

Expand full comment
Olof Ribbing's avatar

And if he is in fact still rich, it's because the facts about his finances are not yet known.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

And he collects more every day from, if not rich, well-off white stupids, some of whom are my neighbors.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I always think of a couple of my ex-high school classmates who live in Florida. I don't know if they donate....one of them is stinking rich and the other lives in Naples and plays bridge all the time. I was having an email conversation with the latter for a while and I could never get her to stop the political talk. What I did discern with her was rabid hate for Obama which was probably racial. When she started using all caps to answer me, while ignoring the facts I had given her, it was time to stop. This person is also intelligent, but she has become a true believer. My take is that they love being able to use the system and have little, if any, integrity.

Expand full comment
Irenie's avatar

And the question about your friend and TFG voters and devotees: what is intelligent? We need a new political dictionary.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

She and I went to school together and at that time she was regarded as an excellent student. So it's book learning in her example. And she runs some kind of computer company.

Expand full comment
FERN MCBRIDE (NYC)'s avatar

It was Donald's debut in the press.

‘No Vacancies’ for Blacks: How Donald Trump Got His Start, and Was First Accused of Bias (Excerpts from The New York Times) Gifted link to article below.

'It was late 1963 — just months before President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the landmark Civil Rights Act — and the tall, mustachioed Fred Trump was approaching the apex of his building career. He was about to complete the jewel in the crown of his middle-class housing empire: seven 23-story towers, called Trump Village, spread across nearly 40 acres in Coney Island.'

'He was also grooming his heir. His son Donald, 17, would soon enroll at Fordham University in the Bronx, living at his parents’ home in Queens and spending much of his free time touring construction sites in his father’s Cadillac, driven by a black chauffeur.'

“His father was his idol,” Mr. Leibowitz recalled. “Anytime he would come into the building, Donald would be by his side.”

' the next decade, as Donald J. Trump assumed an increasingly prominent role in the business, the company’s practice of turning away potential black tenants was painstakingly documented by activists and organizations that viewed equal housing as the next frontier in the civil rights struggle.'

'The Justice Department undertook its own investigation and, in 1973, sued Trump Management for discriminating against blacks. Both Fred Trump, the company’s chairman, and Donald Trump, its president, were named as defendants. It was front-page news, and for Donald, amounted to his debut in the public eye.'

“Absolutely ridiculous,” he was quoted as saying of the government’s allegations.

'Looking back, Mr. Trump’s response to the lawsuit can be seen as presaging his handling of subsequent challenges, in business and in politics. Rather than quietly trying to settle — as another New York developer had done a couple of years earlier — he turned the lawsuit into a protracted battle, complete with angry denials, character assassination, charges that the government was trying to force him to rent to “welfare recipients” and a $100 million countersuit accusing the Justice Department of defamation.'

'When it was over, Mr. Trump declared victory, emphasizing that the consent decree he ultimately signed did not include an admission of guilt.'

'But an investigation by The New York Times — drawing on decades-old files from the New York City Commission on Human Rights, internal Justice Department records, court documents and interviews with tenants, civil rights activists and prosecutors — uncovered a long history of racial bias at his family’s properties, in New York and beyond.'

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.html?unlocked_article_code=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACEIPuomT1JKd6J17Vw1cRCfTTMQmqxCdw_PIxftm3iaga3DFDmwSiPkORJCH_0bRZKF4INc02T2fSJpdKqIqXLlyyfJEPkpiDhOhqZbCmIgAJ299j7OPaV4M_sCHW6Eko3itZ3OlKex7yfritEqKOzHgXLiPhCEjOApmoMR6Jl-ri2gMx6aWQrNw3tko36sxF9stE2d7ESqKtvbvDhp_PszXLU2Pr1lrBJwKHG3bjtWe6LkfcQpNCFqgTH535Gw07d00K8pAde-kbEZmIJyi9O1XXm94L46pBIkzQZzWl9hptL3Lqx-Kzqmm1t8g_yp9YPfSpiOY6kciRFA&smid=url-share

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

'Looking back, Mr. Trump’s response to the lawsuit can be seen as presaging his handling of subsequent challenges, in business and in politics. Rather than quietly trying to settle — as another New York developer had done a couple of years earlier — he turned the lawsuit into a protracted battle, complete with angry denials, character assassination, charges that the government was trying to force him to rent to “welfare recipients” and a $100 million countersuit accusing the Justice Department of defamation.'

And that is how he has "skated" - most of his crimes before becoming president weren't big enough to justify that kind of fight, and if the evidence wasn't so overhwelming it could get through the Baffle Them With Bullshit defense, the prosecutors took a pass.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

I only have ugly four-letter words for Fred Trump and his offsprings and their offsprings!

Expand full comment
Forrest Laws's avatar

For reasons known only to themselves, the national media has legitimized a con man, someone whose statements don't get the same scrutiny that any one on the left faces daily.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

The reasons are very well known, he sells papers and generates views. Since that's how the media make money, it was an easy decision.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

Also, none of his crimes were "big enough" to go after him, plus there was enough "wiggle room" that prosecutors could see him getting a "not guilty" from the jury. Believe it or not, he was always a "small timer" among the Big Crooks. Plus he has demonstrated before he became president and since that he will fight every inch of the way, delay delay delay. A really combative small timer isn't worth the effort in the grand scheme of things.

Of course, that allowed him to graduate to the Biggest of the Big Time Crooks.

Expand full comment
FERN MCBRIDE (NYC)'s avatar

TC is the SYNTHESIZER. Spurred by MIke S.'s comment on how Trump became a 'hardened and successful criminal'; a NY Times article, providing background about how father and son trumped the courts, TC took the bits and pieces and made them whole. The SYNTHESIZER knew which pieces to pick up and how they fit together, bringing Trump's success as a 'hardened criminal' to a climax. This series of exchanges read like a master class in synthesizing. The subject. could not have been better chosen. Thanks to Mike S. for that.

Expand full comment
Dirk Addertongue's avatar

I'm sure white adds to his voter-base appeal and his slipperiness, but it's a far below the rich/politically connected reason. I mean, how many people-of-color of similar wealth have been indicted or arrested for, well, anything? Sure, being non-white means you have to have a bit more money to be invulnerable, but that's partly because race is used so effectively in drawing attention away from the stupendous wealth of this country and the way it has concentrated, and with whom.

Expand full comment
Paula's avatar

3. He is male.

Expand full comment
David Holzman's avatar

Volodymyr Zelensky is male. Jamie Raskin is male.

Expand full comment
Carol Ortlip's avatar

Thank you & I am sometimes ashamed that I am white & not necessarily privileged but by birth & location I have been fortunate. Blessings…

Expand full comment
David Holzman's avatar

Read Woke Racism: How a New Racism has Betrayed America, by John McWhorter. He's a black professor at Columbia.

Expand full comment
MisTBlu's avatar

White-collar crimes are notoriously hard to prosecute because, for the most part, they aren't B&W. It generally has to be something so blatant that a jury can't not convict. Trump and his dad were persecuted for a civil rights violation. The linked Washington Post article describes the suit in very interesting detail. It is not against the law to go bankrupt. It isn't even against the law to cheat your vendors, make them settle for $0.10 on the dollar. Luckily the Georgia case is about a black letter that makes attempting to interfere with an election a felony with a potential for jail. However, I do not expect Trump to ever be behind bars as that would place his Secret Service detail in peril. My hope is that he's sentenced to home confinement in his New York "castle" and cannot play golf or schmooze with the guests of his properties. I assure you that's Trump's idea of Hell.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-the-governments-racial-bias-case-against-donald-trumps-company-and-how-he-fought-it/2016/01/23/fb90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

Well done Mike.

Expand full comment