Would not be surprised. The subtext of this book is that archaeogenetics is "correcting" or at least adjusting some carbon dating- based theories. I am not a scientist but I am in awe of what the DNA of.the finger or teeth or small bone fragment remains of a 40,000 year old ancestor tells us. The book is not dogmatic. It deals in the realms of scientific method and theories.
Would not be surprised. The subtext of this book is that archaeogenetics is "correcting" or at least adjusting some carbon dating- based theories. I am not a scientist but I am in awe of what the DNA of.the finger or teeth or small bone fragment remains of a 40,000 year old ancestor tells us. The book is not dogmatic. It deals in the realms of scientific method and theories.
Would not be surprised. The subtext of this book is that archaeogenetics is "correcting" or at least adjusting some carbon dating- based theories. I am not a scientist but I am in awe of what the DNA of.the finger or teeth or small bone fragment remains of a 40,000 year old ancestor tells us. The book is not dogmatic. It deals in the realms of scientific method and theories.