There have been numerous attempts to educate people like you as to why a "step aside" will not work, and why anyone who "stepped in" would have to develop things from the bottom up, since they would not inherit the support system. What part of all the things the Biden Administration has done - lowest unemployment in 55 years, major inves…
There have been numerous attempts to educate people like you as to why a "step aside" will not work, and why anyone who "stepped in" would have to develop things from the bottom up, since they would not inherit the support system. What part of all the things the Biden Administration has done - lowest unemployment in 55 years, major investments in infrastructure and government operation, getting rid of "junk fees," policing corporate M&A, managing the pandemic successfully, serious efforts to mitigate climate change, etc. - do you dislike?
What's not to like when the government subsidizes health insurance companies to deny care. In states that expanded Medicaid, most doctors won't treat due to low reimbursement rates. In states not expanding Medicaid, the uninsured be damned. The homeless population increases, while tax cuts for the wealthiest not only remain in place over time, they are periodically expanded. These are but the most glaring shortcoming that go unaddressed, while both sides of the political duopoly are hell bent on convincing the peasants that if only "our" party had control, everything would be alright. Sadly, we get the government we deserve.
There have been numerous attempts to educate people like you as to why a "step aside" will not work, and why anyone who "stepped in" would have to develop things from the bottom up, since they would not inherit the support system. What part of all the things the Biden Administration has done - lowest unemployment in 55 years, major investments in infrastructure and government operation, getting rid of "junk fees," policing corporate M&A, managing the pandemic successfully, serious efforts to mitigate climate change, etc. - do you dislike?
What's not to like when the government subsidizes health insurance companies to deny care. In states that expanded Medicaid, most doctors won't treat due to low reimbursement rates. In states not expanding Medicaid, the uninsured be damned. The homeless population increases, while tax cuts for the wealthiest not only remain in place over time, they are periodically expanded. These are but the most glaring shortcoming that go unaddressed, while both sides of the political duopoly are hell bent on convincing the peasants that if only "our" party had control, everything would be alright. Sadly, we get the government we deserve.