John, An exit poll does not a vote count make. When you have evidence of vote recounting that is inconsistent, or some other concrete difference, then you have evidence. Otherwise, this is just supposition and perhaps wishful thinking. What it is not, is evidence that Biden, stole the Democratic nomination. In fact, the reference to two…
John, An exit poll does not a vote count make. When you have evidence of vote recounting that is inconsistent, or some other concrete difference, then you have evidence. Otherwise, this is just supposition and perhaps wishful thinking. What it is not, is evidence that Biden, stole the Democratic nomination. In fact, the reference to two different elections with a discrepancy, one in which Biden was not participating in, would further support the idea that Biden himself has nothing to do with this. So, this is just slander on your part.
Not at all. The pattern of discrepancies in Biden's favor throughout the Democratic primaries will never again be observed if Biden's election reform bill institutionalized mail-in balloting.
Proof takes place within the minds of individuals, applying reason, unless there is "smoking gun" evidence (which is a convenient shortcut). I think that the discrepancies from the exit polls, throughout the Democratic primaries and especially in Massachusetts, constitutes proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Your standard of proof is too low. You are confusing correlation with causation. That is not proof. What reasonable doubt is to you is a low bar. I have reasonable doubt that you understand what reasonable is.
John, An exit poll does not a vote count make. When you have evidence of vote recounting that is inconsistent, or some other concrete difference, then you have evidence. Otherwise, this is just supposition and perhaps wishful thinking. What it is not, is evidence that Biden, stole the Democratic nomination. In fact, the reference to two different elections with a discrepancy, one in which Biden was not participating in, would further support the idea that Biden himself has nothing to do with this. So, this is just slander on your part.
Not at all. The pattern of discrepancies in Biden's favor throughout the Democratic primaries will never again be observed if Biden's election reform bill institutionalized mail-in balloting.
I stand by what I say. Without proof, this is slander.
Proof takes place within the minds of individuals, applying reason, unless there is "smoking gun" evidence (which is a convenient shortcut). I think that the discrepancies from the exit polls, throughout the Democratic primaries and especially in Massachusetts, constitutes proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Your standard of proof is too low. You are confusing correlation with causation. That is not proof. What reasonable doubt is to you is a low bar. I have reasonable doubt that you understand what reasonable is.
The way forward when we have a disagreement like this is to deliberate (as juries do). I suspect that this forum isn't well suited for that.