Steve Wagener, thank you for bringing up that bogus "fact check," which explains absolutely nothing. It's like a minister giving an approve answer to the True Believers, so they can persuade themselves to ignore that disturbing question posed by a skeptic.
That fact check slickly conflate two separate sources, giving the false impression that a mis-speak by a guy named Pease was actually the fault of Theodore Soares. The actual numbers that Soares used, with discussion, are here:
Mr Schmeeckle, I do suggest this. -saw- https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/no-huge-red-flag-that-fraud-occurred-in-mass-primary/
Steve Wagener, thank you for bringing up that bogus "fact check," which explains absolutely nothing. It's like a minister giving an approve answer to the True Believers, so they can persuade themselves to ignore that disturbing question posed by a skeptic.
Whaaa? I read it; it seems to explain a whole lot. you are starting to remind me of the Trump deplorables, where no amount of data will convince them.
That fact check slickly conflate two separate sources, giving the false impression that a mis-speak by a guy named Pease was actually the fault of Theodore Soares. The actual numbers that Soares used, with discussion, are here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200305204359/http://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/04/massachusetts-2020-democratic-party-primary/
Precisely my thought(in response to James Wheaton's comment).