He quietly fomented evil, being the good Quaker that he was, in addition to being a war monger. But he wasn’t 100% useless, like chump. I think he just wanted to fool some in the public square so that he could do his evil behind the scenes.
He quietly fomented evil, being the good Quaker that he was, in addition to being a war monger. But he wasn’t 100% useless, like chump. I think he just wanted to fool some in the public square so that he could do his evil behind the scenes.
I think some portion of the Quaker heritage may have rubbed off. There was a very nasty streak in him, and he caused a lot of suffering for selfish reasons; and yet not so thoroughly reprehensible as St. Reagan (especially on environmental issues), let alone Trump.
But he, like both of them (and I’ll add W), apparently felt/feel like they are entitled to whatever. That’s a core problem as far as I’m concerned. I can’t think of one of our founders who thought it was all about them…
He quietly fomented evil, being the good Quaker that he was, in addition to being a war monger. But he wasn’t 100% useless, like chump. I think he just wanted to fool some in the public square so that he could do his evil behind the scenes.
I think some portion of the Quaker heritage may have rubbed off. There was a very nasty streak in him, and he caused a lot of suffering for selfish reasons; and yet not so thoroughly reprehensible as St. Reagan (especially on environmental issues), let alone Trump.
But he, like both of them (and I’ll add W), apparently felt/feel like they are entitled to whatever. That’s a core problem as far as I’m concerned. I can’t think of one of our founders who thought it was all about them…