I say it is better to pass them by. If one makes a point that interests you, why not think it out and comment yourself separate from the 'intruder'? Each contact they make earns them points. More join them if the site is marked as rich in takers. Our April Forum was no place to be as they practically took over the site. Subscribers …
I say it is better to pass them by. If one makes a point that interests you, why not think it out and comment yourself separate from the 'intruder'? Each contact they make earns them points. More join them if the site is marked as rich in takers. Our April Forum was no place to be as they practically took over the site. Subscribers who do not identify what they may be attracted to having a debate, cry censorship or if recognized for who they are may attract a subscriber eager to beat them at their game. There is not winning with a troll.
Mary, Ask questions. Generally, if you read the trolls 'script', it is well written, challenges Democratic Party, Liberals, progressives, etc., and Biden and issues supported by these groups. The goal is to steer subscribers off track. If you follow LFAA's letter the 'intruder' may question it or a piece of it. There is formal quality to the writing. The main point of is derail subscribers from taking actions on behalf of our goals and issues raised in Heather letter. If you look over DC (his initials) and compare it to the comments and replies of regular subscribers, I think that you'll see the difference. We have subscribers who are pests, obsessive, disgruntled , but trolls are different. I understand, they may be hard to spot for some of us. DC was a demon on the forum in the spring, so he is a familiar one. I hope this helps.
I say it is better to pass them by. If one makes a point that interests you, why not think it out and comment yourself separate from the 'intruder'? Each contact they make earns them points. More join them if the site is marked as rich in takers. Our April Forum was no place to be as they practically took over the site. Subscribers who do not identify what they may be attracted to having a debate, cry censorship or if recognized for who they are may attract a subscriber eager to beat them at their game. There is not winning with a troll.
Okay. Thanks. I have no idea how this works so I'll take your advice.
Mary, Ask questions. Generally, if you read the trolls 'script', it is well written, challenges Democratic Party, Liberals, progressives, etc., and Biden and issues supported by these groups. The goal is to steer subscribers off track. If you follow LFAA's letter the 'intruder' may question it or a piece of it. There is formal quality to the writing. The main point of is derail subscribers from taking actions on behalf of our goals and issues raised in Heather letter. If you look over DC (his initials) and compare it to the comments and replies of regular subscribers, I think that you'll see the difference. We have subscribers who are pests, obsessive, disgruntled , but trolls are different. I understand, they may be hard to spot for some of us. DC was a demon on the forum in the spring, so he is a familiar one. I hope this helps.
Yes, it does help. Thanks much!