Our son is a professor of computer science at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.His area of research is in data search and and retention. His comment is that it is always there. He is paranoid about hacking of banking accounts to the point of having a separate computer that is used for investment accounts etc. and turned off when not in use.
I think the hearing of June 23 is more than a smoking gun, it a smoking howitzer.
Ah....aptly stated. I don't really have the words to describe the relief that what many of us knew is finally having giant lights shed upon it and the instigators. There is much more, but this is now a new kind of tension and I am breathing better knowing the wannabe Narcissus Nazi king is going to be defeated along with all, or at least most, of his comrades. Take heart, friends, Garland is on this as much as the J6 Committee has been on this. What heroes they all are.
Clark had less than two (2) options: Full data recovery is very likely from a single device, single server particularly if linked to a cloud network. Toast. UPDATE: Back on October 3, 2021, the Select Committee already served a letter on "Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Esq.' to appear before the Select Committee on October 29, 2021. Likely, the Select Committee already has substantial direct evidence on Clark from other co-conspirators.
He may have chucked his old devices and purchased new, clean ones. If he still has his old devices, deleted material is still accessible to a pro before it's written over by new material. So Clark's writings may still be there.
Yeah if FBI is looking for new info, it's a bit late. BUT if FBI can (or did) obtain info via DOJ servers, Cloud storage, etc. and show attempts to hide the writings via Clark being cute with his devices, that is Obstruction of Justice. 18 USC 1501-1521. Often it's easier to convict of the cover up than the crime itself.
Watergate was all about the cover-up, not the burglary itself. Every one of the major participants, save the burglars themselves, went to jail over the cover-up.
Aye, but now Trump has six "pets" on the Supreme Court. Very unsettling. We can only hope that at least two of them haven't been completely domesticated yet.
Hi there, dear! I was sorta near you last month, but I sure wish I'd been able to visit Merida instead of Cancun (which I view as an angler fish lure dangled into the Caribbean to attract Americans). The cenotes we saw were gorgeous! The two-hour, unair-conditioned, bus ride to get there, less so.
Ah! Next time Dirk! Yeah, I don't do Cancun, it's atrocious! The cenotes are wonderful. I'm surprised the bus trip was unpleasant, that's unusual and unfortunate 😕
I very much doubt Clark is smart enough to be able to clean those devices well enough to evade the expertise of the computer/electronics forensic analysts from the FBI. Clark strikes me as more of an opportunist as opposed to a savvy strategist.
Except if you are trump whose phone logs are incomplete for Jan 6; whose old phones can’t be found or more classified documents taken from the White House are floating in his cesspool at Mar a Lardo.!
There is a phone record of EVERY phone call conducted from one phone to another, the problem is that is all there is, e.g. the only data saved is the record of the transmission time and location.
Who actually made the call remains unknown.
However a strong supposition of who made and received the call is never much in doubt.
However such supposition when in a court of law is the job of the judge or jury to determine whether evidence, (such supposition is referred to in court as heresy and is often objected to by the opposing attorneys with the judge sustaining such objection), offered as proof is credible.
I imagine he already knew he was in deep doo-doo. My guess those devices are as clean as newly fallen snow.
There is only two ways Clark could have “…cleaned his devices…”
(1). Burn all into a melted glob of plastic, rubber, and precious metals, or
(2). Have the same specialized software and skilled genius personnel as the United States National Security Agency, (NSA).
He did neither.
Additionally, there is now substantial discovered, (forensically uncovered), information cross referencing the data Clark may have thought he deleted.
Such uncovered information will prove he attempted purposeful withholding of evidence of his criminal complicity.
His goose is cooked and he knows it now!
Ha!
Good riddance to another filthy rotten vermin Traitor, Eh!?
Our son is a professor of computer science at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.His area of research is in data search and and retention. His comment is that it is always there. He is paranoid about hacking of banking accounts to the point of having a separate computer that is used for investment accounts etc. and turned off when not in use.
I think the hearing of June 23 is more than a smoking gun, it a smoking howitzer.
Ah....aptly stated. I don't really have the words to describe the relief that what many of us knew is finally having giant lights shed upon it and the instigators. There is much more, but this is now a new kind of tension and I am breathing better knowing the wannabe Narcissus Nazi king is going to be defeated along with all, or at least most, of his comrades. Take heart, friends, Garland is on this as much as the J6 Committee has been on this. What heroes they all are.
Yes!
Clark had less than two (2) options: Full data recovery is very likely from a single device, single server particularly if linked to a cloud network. Toast. UPDATE: Back on October 3, 2021, the Select Committee already served a letter on "Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Esq.' to appear before the Select Committee on October 29, 2021. Likely, the Select Committee already has substantial direct evidence on Clark from other co-conspirators.
He may have chucked his old devices and purchased new, clean ones. If he still has his old devices, deleted material is still accessible to a pro before it's written over by new material. So Clark's writings may still be there.
Yeah if FBI is looking for new info, it's a bit late. BUT if FBI can (or did) obtain info via DOJ servers, Cloud storage, etc. and show attempts to hide the writings via Clark being cute with his devices, that is Obstruction of Justice. 18 USC 1501-1521. Often it's easier to convict of the cover up than the crime itself.
Watergate was all about the cover-up, not the burglary itself. Every one of the major participants, save the burglars themselves, went to jail over the cover-up.
Aye, but now Trump has six "pets" on the Supreme Court. Very unsettling. We can only hope that at least two of them haven't been completely domesticated yet.
Ha! They've all be domesticated. Roe v Wade was reversed today.
Exactly
Hi there, dear! I was sorta near you last month, but I sure wish I'd been able to visit Merida instead of Cancun (which I view as an angler fish lure dangled into the Caribbean to attract Americans). The cenotes we saw were gorgeous! The two-hour, unair-conditioned, bus ride to get there, less so.
Ah! Next time Dirk! Yeah, I don't do Cancun, it's atrocious! The cenotes are wonderful. I'm surprised the bus trip was unpleasant, that's unusual and unfortunate 😕
Makes me appreciate my trip to Cozumel then Merida even more!
Excellent, always hated “the cloud,” but glory.
INDEED!
If not, he is a moron of MAGA proportions.
He hasn't shown much evidence that he is NOT 'a moron of MAGA proportions'.
Hopefully arrogance blinded him to the danger. These folks thought they were above the law.
You can't clean them. You either physically, utterly destroy them or they can be scraped.
True, they can be degaussed by a data destruction company, but the devices would be useless afterwords.
I very much doubt Clark is smart enough to be able to clean those devices well enough to evade the expertise of the computer/electronics forensic analysts from the FBI. Clark strikes me as more of an opportunist as opposed to a savvy strategist.
Remember how hard it was to get rid of Sec. of State Clinton's emails? It's even harder now, both to get rid of data and to conceal the attempt.
Except if you are trump whose phone logs are incomplete for Jan 6; whose old phones can’t be found or more classified documents taken from the White House are floating in his cesspool at Mar a Lardo.!
There is a phone record of EVERY phone call conducted from one phone to another, the problem is that is all there is, e.g. the only data saved is the record of the transmission time and location.
Who actually made the call remains unknown.
However a strong supposition of who made and received the call is never much in doubt.
However such supposition when in a court of law is the job of the judge or jury to determine whether evidence, (such supposition is referred to in court as heresy and is often objected to by the opposing attorneys with the judge sustaining such objection), offered as proof is credible.
George E. Dobbs just a quick question-did you mean "Hear Say"? "heresy" is a religious term.
Hi Barbara D. Reed:
Both probably while discussing Clark, Eh!?
Thanks!