When someone propagates lies about the Coronavirus, it's akin to yelling 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. There is no First Amendment right in this case.
There is no equivalence in 'protecting free speech' here. The opposition were not silenced, they were met with opposition and they chose to slink out of the room like the yellow bellied r…
When someone propagates lies about the Coronavirus, it's akin to yelling 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. There is no First Amendment right in this case.
There is no equivalence in 'protecting free speech' here. The opposition were not silenced, they were met with opposition and they chose to slink out of the room like the yellow bellied rat bastards that they are.
When someone propagates lies about the Coronavirus, it's akin to yelling 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. There is no First Amendment right in this case.
There is no equivalence in 'protecting free speech' here. The opposition were not silenced, they were met with opposition and they chose to slink out of the room like the yellow bellied rat bastards that they are.
Again, tolerating intolerance is not healthy.
Put that way, I understand the boundary. Thanks.