783 Comments

"and generally sounded like someone you wouldn’t want to sit near at a restaurant—let alone be President of the United States."

Exactly.

"Vance doubled down on his denigration of women who have not given birth as “childless cat ladies” but assured voters he has nothing against cats."

Just ladies.

Expand full comment

JL, he just has something against any childless ladies whom he feels have worked against God’s plan. Interestingly, he expresses no similar rancor against men who don’t produce children or fail to support them once they’re born.

His idea that the father (notice that he doesn’t mention the mother) should have voting power proportional to the number of children produced doesn’t address the issue of which children count: all children produced or only those produced in a heterosexual marriage? Also, if your wife leaves due to spousal abuse, do you lose your extra votes? Do you get those extra votes for all children produced (including miscarriages) or only those living at the time of the election?

Oh, wait, if 45 gets his way, the discussion of how many votes a father gets would be moot…

Expand full comment

Weird, unlawful, misogynistic, prejudicial against everything America stands for. Well, duh. He is the perfect VP for chump, bat-Schitt crazy

Expand full comment

And without much of any personal power or big money backers (besides Thiel, who likely just wanted to own a rightwing radical Senator) pore ol' Vance would be the perfect scapegoat to offer as sacrifice if necessary.

Expand full comment

My thought too T L.

I was thinking yesterday about dumpty staying home in his jammies, as Lawrence O'Donnell suggested. And after Kamala wipes the floor with him, will he crawl away?

Never ever.

The orange Cocksplat and the Couch Stain make such an incredible pair. May they drown together in sinking Florida.

Expand full comment

Hopefully they will make it a threesome and take desantis with them!

Expand full comment

"sink" baby.., SINK!

Expand full comment

Is it possible for them to sink lower still?

Expand full comment

Jen, thank you for giving me a name for JD, miserable misogynist (among other awful things) that he is. He will certainly be the scapegoat and I am going to say when, not if, death star loses.

Expand full comment

Along with Democrats. How dare they oppose God's mandate that those with the most money win?

Expand full comment

LMAO 'couch stain' had me choking on my smoothie!

Expand full comment

I know I noticed and laughed, too. If you want a prolonged spell of giggles, chuckles and great belly laughs, go over to Jay Kuo's Substack and check out this Saturday's "Xeets and Giggles". In his weekly research, Mr. Kuo collects any particularly memorable tweet, or truth or meme and puts them all together in a great post for Saturday laughs. This Saturday's post had plenty of couch memes and was hysterically funny.

Expand full comment

We can hope that if DJT loses the 2024 Election, he will accept that decision gracefully... I doubt it... He has already said he won't... He hasn't even accepted 2020's loss... He has already promised a Civil-War is case of a loss... Let's Hope For The Best...

Expand full comment

Hope, vote, and quote

Expand full comment

We will be prepared. We know what peaceful means to trumpers. The National Guard should be on full alert.

Expand full comment

May they be seen for what they are, which is worse.

Expand full comment

That’s what repubs are wont to do. How many have trod that path…

Expand full comment

I may be unfair here, but my impression is that narcissistic Trump would betray anyone; even his own family, if he believed it served his personal agenda.

Expand full comment

JL - I think that’s a fair statement. Fits his mental illness diagnoses perfectly.

Expand full comment

I am worried that President Trump will replace Vance. BUMMER.

"He’s also the perfect scapegoat for a Trump campaign that has foundered since Kamala Harris became the apparent Democratic nominee.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/7/26/2258308/-JD-Vance-is-a-gift-to-Democrats

"The pull of blaming it all on Vance and moving on to Trump Vice President No. 3 is likely to be irresistible."

Expand full comment

Firing people is his shtick, but this is more complicated.

Expand full comment

Another turd in the punchbowl. Quite the Party. But, they're drinking that kool-aid.., one can only hope that it takes them out.

Expand full comment

They resemble the Jones cult more every day

Expand full comment

Just thinking that yesterday.

Expand full comment

jD Chilcult, that has been my thought for months, this trump cult reminds me of the Jones cult and that did not work out well for them, sadly, sadly, sadly.

Expand full comment

Delusional cults often stray into violence. Some harm themselves, some destroy others. Jones did both.

Expand full comment

But did current candidates even consider the possibility that they were being the suckers and losers. None I know.

Expand full comment

Chump & Dump!

Expand full comment

Tee shirt time.

Expand full comment

Nicely put, J.D.; from Dr Cox Richardson: "but [Vice President Harris's] campaign has taken the approach of referring to [President Trump] and J.D. Vance as weirdos." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgAoGf84-3A This is just the kid of push-back I have been hoping for. Laugh these bozoes off of the bus! Nothing sends macho mouths as quickly into comedic conniptions as laughing at them.

Expand full comment

It’s the kind of funny that will cause us to cry if we fail in meeting the challenge

Expand full comment

jD. You got that right in target.

Expand full comment

Fits like OJ’s glove should have

Expand full comment

The only problem is that if trump wins (if there is a god, it won't happen) Vance will take over if trump dies in office. There will be no respite. It may even be worse.

Expand full comment

The money and Putin will rule either way. Can’t get worse than that. God doesn’t vote, we have free will to be stupid, ignorant and oh so human

Expand full comment

votes for embryos? Oh wait - they want to prohibit IVF. Votes for sperm count?

Expand full comment

Yes, right now in this country embryos have more rights than women do.I also agree with those who are mentioning men’s roles in all of this.Childless men are contributing nothing to society but men are never considered in the children equation ,just women.

Expand full comment

Zygotes have more rights than mothers, or their delivered kids.

Expand full comment

"Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great, if a sperm is wasted God will get irate ..." Monty Python

Expand full comment

Perfect. Zygote is potential life and so is sperm. We need sperm to have the right to vote and there are a lot more of them. Let's register sperm to vote.

Expand full comment

And unlike eggs, more are made each day. (Of course this is sarcasm.)

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

"Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great, if a sperm is wasted, God will be irate." So, start saving your ejaculate!

Expand full comment

Make it simple: One dollar, one vote. -- $COTUS

Expand full comment

a hundred years ago, and less, mothers would check their teenage male beds for any telltale signs of sperm. For a lively lad, that could be close to a billion sperm. Geez. Nutz. I think most of this comes from a traditional austerity Christian outlook, thankfully mostly a past thing. Even Ann Landers was ok on masterbation. Besides, its generally irrepressible.

Expand full comment

Good lord, I have four younger brothers, don’t think my mom was that crazy. She was too busy to be nuts with eight young’uns

Expand full comment

lol my mother, as far as I know, wasn't a bed checker either. She never got beyond being a baptist "adherent"... not sure why she didnt want to be baptised.

Expand full comment

And don't tell me "Christian" men don't do it.

Expand full comment

mostly impossible

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

Dunno. Masturbation put hair on my knuckles. Now everybody knows.

😯🙏🤔⚖️😊🚀😉

Expand full comment

I have a popular medical guide book from the early 20th Century which ascribes multiple conditions of mental and physical ill health to masturbation, and advises supervising a pubescent kid 24 hours a day if necessary. For real.

Expand full comment

lol Ned, I don't think so! Dont overdo it, end up with repetitive strain injury.

Expand full comment

‘Irrepressible.” Haha

Expand full comment

for the most part, for most men, that was my personal experience. I do know a guy who refused to masterbate, a staunch traditional Catholic, but he also had OCD. Take a poll on how Catholic priests manage....

Expand full comment

Marcia, a perfect quote to describe the religious railing about wasting sperm in self satisfaction. The Church has long known the power of sex....just think about those guys sitting on pillars in the desert or in caves in Egypt, thinking about women day and night I bet.

Expand full comment

Michele, or maybe about the guys sitting next to them?

Expand full comment

Or the goat next door. Or the dog running down the street. Or the sheep in the field over yonder. 😈😁

Expand full comment

LOL

Expand full comment

'Every sperm is sacred.' Remember that Monty Python song? It was a satirical statement against the Catholic Church that may well apply here. The video is easily found on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzVHjg3AqIQ&t=2s.

Expand full comment

As Uncle Toby suggests in Tristram Shandy, the repubs must begin by baptizing the sperm.

Expand full comment

He must be really pissed at all of the great sperm wasted on bed sheets.

Expand full comment

OMG! I'd forgotten that episode. Thanks for the ammunition.

Expand full comment

Good one.

Expand full comment

Perfect. Conception begins at erection, after all.

Expand full comment

Jen, you're on fire with your comments... 😂

Expand full comment

Oh shit, I'd be broke

Expand full comment

HA! LOVE THIS!!!

Expand full comment

Or impure thoughts.

Expand full comment

Why not? Makes perfect sense to me.

How far are we going to go on with this stupidness?

Robert🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😳🤪

Expand full comment

Now you are onto the problem. Irresponsible ejaculators!

Expand full comment

Yes!!!! Think of all of the potential babies that are being destroyed by that one selfish act! lol

Expand full comment

'Ware the couch.

Expand full comment

It should be banned like abortions are!

Expand full comment

"votes for embryos?"

Nothing new. Heard it floated years ago at CPAC (CSpan.) Along with a claim that the Second Amendment was intended to protect the unborn.

This year an RNC speaker was antiabortion activist Abby Johnson who has advocated for "a head-of-household voting system that has historically barred women and people of color from casting ballots." Saying "In godly households that would be the husband."

Expand full comment

🤢

Expand full comment

Colorado had fetal personhood on the ballot in 2008, the Obama year. I was exit polling that year, and the crap I saw at the polls was shocking. Grateful almost all ballots by mail or drop box in Colorado now. I think the entire morning vote at the polling place I watched was lost due to a hard drive crash and internet issue that kept the location from downloading the vote.

Expand full comment

Well, that WOULD result in fewer votes for the Trampler and the sidekick, so there's that.

Expand full comment

I would love it if every man had to give a sample of his sperm, to see how many sperm he had in an ejaculation, and this number became public.

Expand full comment

I'd be happy if the gummint kept a database of every man's dna. So we could garnish his wages til death for irresponsible ejaculstion.

Expand full comment

LOL. Jen. Everyone here is really on a roll.

Expand full comment

Or not supporting the children a girl or woman must birth.

Expand full comment

In TX, if you rape a woman and impregnate them, there is about a 2% chance of being charged and convicted of rape.

When my daughter was born they registered her for a SS#, and took her footprint. This was in 1994. Why not take everyone's DNA at birth, or maybe some states are already doing that?

Expand full comment

It it being reported that sperm counts are plunging; possibly due to industrial chemicals permeating out current environment.

Expand full comment

Spilling one's seed is verboten in their almighty old testament. I wonder how we can enforce a ban on ejaculations?

Expand full comment

"Spilling one's seed is verboten in their almighty old testament."

Not so.

1. The Torah does not have any negative commandment concerning 'spilling one's seed.' The misconception comes from a misreading of the story of Onan. Whose sin was refusing to fulfill the social obligation of levirate marriage.*

2. The 'Old Testament' is certainly not almighty among the Evangelicals and Catholics who are bent on imposing their religious creed on civil society. Otherwise instead of targeting health care providers they'd target purveyors of bacon cheeseburgers.

*"Onan[a] was a figure detailed in the Book of Genesis chapter 38,[1] as the second son of Judah who married the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite. Onan had an older brother Er and a younger brother, Shelah as well.

After being commanded by his father, Judah, to perform his duty as a husband's brother according to the custom of levirate marriage with the late Er's wife Tamar, Onan instead refused to perform his duty as a levirate and "spilled his seed on the ground whenever he went in" because "the offspring would not be his", and was thus put to death by Yahweh.[2] This act is detailed as retribution for being "displeasing in the sight of Lord".[3][4] Onan's crime is often misinterpreted to be masturbation but it is universally agreed among biblical scholars that Onan's death is attributed to his refusal to fulfill his obligation of levirate marriage with Tamar by committing coitus interruptus.[5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan

Expand full comment

My impression is that many aspects of the Bible are all but universally misinterpreted.

Expand full comment

Just like the shit that Trump says: some love it, some revile it

Expand full comment

The bible makes for great reading. The King James Bible, mainly the Old Testament, is literature essential for a western education. Believing in a God is not necessary. It's the backbone of a huge amount of our literature. Every writer used to know the Bible. 100 years ago , in much of America, it was the only book in the house.

Expand full comment

Ty lin!

Expand full comment

prohibition didn't work out so well. The failure rate here is about 95%+

Expand full comment

A stopcock?

Expand full comment

Perfect!

Expand full comment

How about what will happen when "men waste their seeds"?!!!

Expand full comment

It was mentioned that sperm would be counted as human life also. Every pre-adolescent boy and horny guy would be arrested for murder. I understand that these IVF is in a freezer or some sort of refrigeration. What happens when the power goes out? and there is no generator?

Expand full comment

They intend to take away women's right to vote. These impotent men blame women for their lack of being able to succeed against us, therefore they need to strip us of our rights and keep us barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen where they think we belong. Yes women belong in the house, and senate and the White House!

Expand full comment

What about the illegitimate children you fathered and refuse to support? Do you get to vote for them too?

Expand full comment

Jen, I would love to asked my only surviving brother this question. Before we stopped speaking to each other, I was contacted by a man who was searching for his father (we share DNA). I emailed my brother and never received an answer. He’s a MAGAman and I think it’s kind of funny that he doesn’t realize his secret is out, thanks to family members on both sides being part of the same DNA family network.

Expand full comment

Mary. It is all so insane, to believe that someone could think like jd let alone be a candidate for vice president. All so SICK!

Expand full comment

Kamala's campaign is correct to call them weirdos. And that's mild, IMHO.

Expand full comment

Because of deadbeat fathers the government has become abba.

Expand full comment

Yes you never hear anything about the males in the anti-abortion battle. It's ALL about women..... The GOP is dominated by males, and scripture is plain speak on that one.

Expand full comment

Bottom line - Vance is an opportunist and likely does not believe all the sh-t spewing from his mouth. More of the “say anything, do anything” to seize power. JD faux-billy sees Trump as the vehicle to power.

Expand full comment

Do you suppose all of his anti-women rhetoric comes from his childhood experience of his mother?

Expand full comment

Wonder how he feels about Paul's statement in the New Testament:

Corinthians 7:7-8 New Living Translation (NLT)

But I wish everyone were single, just as I am. Yet each person has a special gift from God, of one kind or another. So I say to those who aren't married and to widows—it's better to stay unmarried, just as I am.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 28

In actuality, if there is an admissions committee interview to get into heaven, I will have explaining to do for never marrying or having children. I believe that procreation, perhaps better stated as parenting, is a Xian duty.

But to condemn those who have chosen against it strikes me as proving a fundamental lack of charity. In any case, ¿is there not a deduction for dependents? I could see the level of deduction being elevated to a more realistic level, if that need be.

As to your other hypothetical, likely rhetorical questions, Mary, you nail it. It is a 'policy proposal' that Senator Vance knows will gain no traxion. Cynically does he say these things to throw red meat over the transom to M.A.G.A.s locked in a quarantining room.

Expand full comment

The other question is, do all women who've had children get this extra bonus, or just Christian women? Wouldn't giving non-Christian children extra votes "sully" the vote, in their eyes?

Expand full comment

J. Mil, as I read it, only the fathers get the extra votes.

Expand full comment

Actually I read 'people". But the question remains, would the children of POC or gay couples also afford the adults extra votes?

Expand full comment

Probably not gay fathers, unless they contributed their sperm. POC? I’m not sure whether they would need a white father to count (kind of like Clarence Thomas going after past Supreme Court decisions dependent on the 14th amendment except for Loving v. Virginia—which legalized his marriage to Gini).

Expand full comment

Best constructed comment EVER!

Expand full comment

I think fetal personhood definitely counts 🙄😳

Expand full comment

Hey, if corporate person-hood is a thing. Even a bottle of Mr. Clean.

Expand full comment

How would they spportion votes for miscarried or (horrors) aborted fetuses?

Expand full comment

Marge, I would expect that they would count the miscarriages the same as born babies who died after birth—one vote apiece. As for willfully aborted fetuses—those wouldn’t count because you’d be in jail and a felon.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

J L, he should be very afraid of ladies, very afraid. They are riled up and fired up, and ready to start taking back rights they have recently lost, as well as other rights which they may well lose given Vance's and others' rhetoric. Womentum, as I called it yesterday, and I'm here for it.

I see Vance as an albatross around the convicted felon''s neck, whose own naked misogyny should be enough to cause him to lose female voters, a majority of which has historically voted Republican. Vance is a distraction on the ticket, more newsworthy than CF45 himself, who must have buyer's remorse. Someone needs to post daily photographs of a head of lettuce. On a couch.

Meanwhile, mark your calendars, folks: the convicted felon's fate will be determined on September 6th, when a hearing will be held to consider whether the conviction in New York State should be overturned, given SCOTUS decision on presidential immunity a few weeks ago (*extremely* unlikely, from what I've read.) Sentencing will follow on September 18. Donold is scared to death, as he rightfully should be, for his days of reckoning are nearing. No wonder he's exhorting his followers to vote, and offering chilling words after: that they won't need to in four years because he'll have "fixed" everything.

Exactly, to use your word, J L.

Expand full comment

“A head of lettuce on a couch”

Brilliant. Just brilliant. 🤪

Expand full comment

Thanks GeorgeC.

Expand full comment

wait -- I missed that -- what's the quote from -- it's sooooo good!!

Expand full comment

A few years back, the UK was churning through Prime Ministers and one (whose name I don’t recall), was expected to last less time than it took for a head of lettuce to wilt. There was a website with a live camera on the head on lettuce (I think the lettuce lasted longer).

Expand full comment

Trump should tell Vance to just Shut Up!….. But, I hope he doesn’t because Vance is definitely dragging him down. Plus, doesn’t Vance look more “Presidential “? And, MUCH younger?

I’m really looking forward to how crazy this campaign (to keep him out of jail) is going to make him. I forecast seeing a real meltdown. We know what tffg is made of: jelly.

Expand full comment

It's difficult to imagine someone, anyone on earth, dragging Trump down. Where does one sink from rock bottom?

Expand full comment

DJT jr. And btw hasn't he been engaged to that strange looking lip-injected thing for several years now?

Expand full comment

Yikes, I say. Why do women do that shit to their lips? For men? To advertise (questionable) fellating skills?

Expand full comment

I had a chat w my PT about cosmetic surgery and she said she thought women did it for themselves, but her mom wouldn't. She'd had a tumor removed near her jaw and still couldn't feel her ear lobe, so why?

But the lip thing? It's gotta be for men. And your latter reason I think.

It looks so unnatural.

Expand full comment

"China Syndrome" One hundred and fifth circle of Hell.

Expand full comment

Those fat cheeks and low brow look Cro Magnon to me.

Expand full comment

Neanderthal comes to mind. Wouldn’t he and MTG make some pretty babies!? 🤢

Expand full comment

Adding to this:

(The Borowitz Report)—In a welcome piece of good news for the embattled vice-presidential nominee, a new poll released on Thursday shows that a hundred percent of likely Democratic voters favor JD Vance remaining on the GOP ticket.

Vance’s strong showing with Democratic voters stands in sharp contrast with his performance among Republicans, only 17 percent of whom support his continuing as nominee.

Among those Democrats surveyed, a hundred percent agreed with the statement “JD Vance should receive more airtime” while a hundred percent concurred with the statement “Just let JD be JD.”

Expand full comment

What are Donold Trumps made of? Hubris and spite and all things shite.

Expand full comment

“Donold” good one. You’re on a roll Doug!

Expand full comment

Someone should have told him before he got his ear nicked, "Duck Donold, Duck!"

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

we are all feeling our oats this morning!

Expand full comment

And I’m so grateful for the humor and laughs. A good feeling for a change.

Expand full comment

Me too!

Expand full comment

There is now a meme using Donold. And of course, many about childless women and cats.

Expand full comment

Thanks runragged (although I should have pointed out I stole that from someone else.)

Expand full comment

Well then, thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment

“Womentum” is also brilliant.

Expand full comment

“Womentum” I LOVE IT!!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Catherine!

Expand full comment

Doug, yes he should be afraid of ladies who right now are busy raising lots of money for Harris. I did smile about the head of lettuce on a couch. Every time he opens his mouth, it gets worse and he just doubles down. As I recall, and I may be wrong here, he had great praise for his mamaw who he described as one tough woman in his book.

Expand full comment

But he surely doesn’t want any more of those, based on his cultural positions.

Expand full comment

"I see Vance as an albatross around the convicted felon's neck" I have seen some potentially REALLY BAD news: Trump may drumpf Vance, as scorpions often do, and replace him with a calmer presence like that of Governor Burgum.

From a political essayist whom I trust, Mark Sumner of 'Daily Kos': "[Vance is] also the perfect scapegoat for a Trump campaign that has foundered since Kamala Harris became the apparent Democratic nominee.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/7/26/2258308/-JD-Vance-is-a-gift-to-Democrats

"The pull of blaming it all on Vance and moving on to Trump Vice President No. 3 is likely to be irresistible. Don’t be surprised if Vance gets to go home soon . . . while plotting how to punish people who don’t have children. No doubt, though, that he’ll miss getting first dibs at 'a ton of crap.'"

Expand full comment

Ned, to dump Vance, he’d have to admit that he (and his sons) were wrong to choose him in the first place—the time interval is too short to blame it on Vance changing, as he did Pence.

Expand full comment

Good point, Mary. Boy, oh boy, do I hope you are correct.

Expand full comment

Ned, I agree -- that's why I thought someone should have a daily series of a head of lettuce (on a couch, because that would be just perfect. Yeah, I don't see that ticket lasting -- he's attracting too much attention. And Vance just came out with a comment about his Indian wife: "Yes, she's not a white woman, but I love her". (Paraphrased)

Expand full comment
Jul 28·edited Jul 28

I wonder about Senator Vance's wife. She strikes me as lovely and refined. At times during the 'mock' Convention, Mrs Vance looked uncomfortable; perhaps the lure of proximity to power proves overwhelming. In her position, I would be worried about papa's effect on the little one's.

Expand full comment

I read that she was a Never Trumper, but then again, so was JD until he wasn't. That's about all I know of her.

Expand full comment

Yeah, to quote the great twentieth century German philosopher, Sergeant Schultz: "I know nothing!"

Expand full comment

Dolt 45 seems to focus on the "base". Vile is good.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

(quote) "Harris continually refers to Trump as a criminal in her speeches"

AND SHE SHOULD !!

Damn it, he's always going on about "sleepy Joe", Kamala should call the Orange Felon out for what he really is!

Expand full comment

Fatty?......

Expand full comment

Hm, might be interpreted as 'fat shaming'... But there's no denying he is orange, and there's also no denying he's a felon.

Expand full comment

He's orange by choice. Possibly he's also fat by choice, but possibly not - he doesn't even walk the golf course, fgs; it's possible he's too out of shape to do so. Ignorant, cruel, with the mental capacity, arrogance, emotional maturity and vocabulary of a 7th grader, fraud, sex pest, seditionist insurrectionist, defamer/liar - there's lots of things he is by choice, so we don't need to fat-shame him. Also orange.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

Definitely orange. But you forgot racist, malignant, narcissist, downright antisocial, horribly egocentric and machiavellist.

Expand full comment

You're right. We don't want to alienate 50% of the Americans who are obese.

Expand full comment

I don't love the "weird" label that her campaign is using. Felon and criminal is accurate. In some parts like the PNW, "weird" in urban language has a positive connotation and doesn't mean JD Vance at all, eg. "Keep Portland (Oregon) Weird"

Expand full comment

Agreed. That "weird" uncle might be a pretty cool uncle depending on the context... "Crazy" might be the better word, especially for Vance.

Expand full comment

Bigoted, antisocial, deranged, creepy, freaky, lacking empathy, are all better words than "weird". I like creepy, there's no positive connotation to the word and it is accurate.

Expand full comment

Agreed.

Expand full comment

Mean? Just say "no" to slugs.

Expand full comment

Cats, however, have a big grudge against him.

Expand full comment

Next, Vance and Trump will accuse cats of fraudulently voting.

Expand full comment

Just registered our cat to vote 9 times--nine lives you know!

Expand full comment

Good idea! I have 3 cats!

Expand full comment

Cats are actually little people with fur coats.

Expand full comment

Seems like it sometimes.

Expand full comment

But of course.

Expand full comment

Cats should count as voters, but their ladies get to vote for them.

Expand full comment

All of my Mountain cats are

on the warpath over JD

Vance remarks about cat

ladies. I am their caretaker

here and gave birth to 3

children. Stick it Vance.

Expand full comment

I have had children and I have had cats. I can tell you, cats are a better deal.

Expand full comment

Oh! You let the cat out of the bag.

Expand full comment

when I had the kids, I decided they had to have pets and we had dogs, cats, rabbits, gerbils, a horse...I wanted them to have unconditional love and they certainly weren't going to get it from me. I'm just not that stupid.

Expand full comment

In some ways. There are

about 20 Mountain cats on

average, most abandoned

as kittens and about 5 very

feral. There's another group

of 8-10 further down the

Mountain I can't reach in my

wheelchair and my landlord

takes care of. It can get a bit

rowdy at times and there are

no rooms to send them to, to

cool down.😁

Expand full comment

Mountain cats? Do they look different than regular cats? Like Norwegian Forest cats? Larger? My Mexican cat is an ordinary gray tiger with some siamese in him, I think, because he's very yappie and very smart. Left at my front door 11 years ago. From the very first minute he had no problem with my Doberman (another rescue). he was raised by a family with kids and dogs....He loves company.

Expand full comment

By necessary implication he hates cats, despite the denial. Pet lovers unite.

https://danielsolomon.substack.com/p/pet-owners-unite

Expand full comment

I think the whole GOP hates nature and wants to stamp it out , asap.

Expand full comment

We already know who doesn't like dogs... or probably cats either

Expand full comment

Or, people.

Expand full comment

Good point!

Expand full comment

If you cant sell it, get rid of it. The Reagan Administration proposed that species protection should be dependent on the presumed monetary value of the species in question.

Expand full comment

With only two of your own words you crystallized my thoughts and reactions…. Exactly.

Expand full comment

Doctor, what's with the red circle with a tiny red check mark followed by the words -- "Examined" ?

Do not answer with any personal information. Thank you in advance Ryan

Expand full comment

I cannot help but wonder, what's up with JD's wife? This is an educated, female, person of color, and she accedes to her husband's sanctimony and vile anti-woman propaganda? If true, she is yet another woman stabbing the rest of her sisters in the back, a la Nikki Haley.

Expand full comment

Women march mightily in the "pro life" movement. Curiously, a small? majority of younger females pre-high school grad lean that way. We all live in cultural bubbles, remember that, all. In certain parts of the world, it's women who perform female genital mutilation.

Expand full comment

Societal manipulation is common, is it not. You are right, best we remember that. Especially those who want all females to reject the hijab.

Expand full comment

Some women, and I know at least one, who is brilliant, will submit to the perceived superiority of the X and Y chromosome combo. They get their bluff in and even smart, accomplished women bow down. It’s interesting to watch up close. She admired my kind, smart husband and I once offered to trade for a week. I said first thing I would do is get one of those button badges that said “You have mistaken me for someone who cares what you think,” and put it on first day. Sadly, she declined and is still bowing down.

Expand full comment

Really strange. She's superior and she likes him???

Expand full comment

Felt this way from the first time we learned anything about her!

Expand full comment

I love the labeling them as 'weird' - so true and hopefully effective.

Expand full comment

Just to say. When I got that Walz fund raising email, his use of 'weird' jumped out at me. And I unsubscribed. In the 60s that label was used to attack a wide range of people who did not fit a typical self presentation in appearance or ideas. That was a lot of us. Historically it has been used to attack people who are not neurotypical - many of our most vulnerable fellow humans.

I don't think we should stoop to name calling. There are better - more accurate and less fraught -

ways to refer to our opponents.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

They could say “the ideas of the GOP are weird” or “the things the GOP and the P/VP ticket say are offensive, inappropriate, and screw-ball nutty” or “if the MAGA/GOP think america is so bad, why are they still living here? Stop shit-talking our country- shit talking is not policy"

Expand full comment

Lin, I'm not sure the word has quite the same connotation today. And I was around in the 60s, but don't remember that used as a pejorative -- which ISN'T to say it wasn't, and I'm sorry that it brings up those memories for you.

I just don't think younger folks (or even those more senior) associate it that way.

I wish I could "opt out" of receiving fund-raising texts -- "Stop2End" just makes them used a different number.

Expand full comment

I donated to Liz warren and the texts from Dem. candidates from all over the country came in...until I gave up that cell number. Due to that, I stopped donating. I thought isn't there a way to send cash??? But, when I donated to Actblue for Harris, they didn't require a number.

Expand full comment

Do you have a checking account? I send checks, and don't give out my cell number,ever!

Expand full comment

Actually....that's a good idea. I just checked my promotions email file and already have dozens of Kamala emails ...I really don't want them. It feels like getting beaten over the head. ....Checks sent from Mexico might make it by Christmas.......

Expand full comment

Absolutely!

Expand full comment

If you think labeling opponents as 'weird' is a tactical error, then please take a moment to let the DNC et al know.

https://democrats.org/contact-us/

Expand full comment

Thank you. I will. And, I have a some other things I want them to hear.

Expand full comment

This is well-intended, but I can’t help but think of the old phrase about bringing a penknife to a gunfight.

Expand full comment

Sometimes metaphor obscures rather than illuminates.

What we want to do is bring facts and decorum to a political debate.

Expand full comment

True, but this isn't one of those times.

Expand full comment

He's orange by choice. Also by choice: ignorant, cruel, with the mental capacity, arrogance, emotional maturity and vocabulary of a 7th grader, fraud, sex pest, seditionist insurrectionist, defamer/liar, convicted felon (although probably not by choice!) - there's lots of things he is by choice, so we don't need to call names.

Expand full comment

He gets away with being a (whatever) because of $$$$$

Expand full comment

I agree with lin. I am so tired of the name calling. I do not want our candidates to stoop to that level. It is a MAGA tactic that we should not replicate.

Expand full comment