386 Comments

As a Freshman in college at Texas A&M in 1978, the college newspaper ran only two opinion writers.

George Will and William F. Buckley

These two opinion writers swayed a large number of kids from Texas who came from farms to, ostensibly, improve their financial futures.

By the end of my four years, I was solidly Republican all the way to the Invasion of Iraq, where, I had previously been reading, for years, about the inspectors on the ground in Iraq and their work. I knew, from their reports to the U.N., that Saddam had no program in Nuclear Weapons, although, I thought he MIGHT have some of the leftover chemical weapons the United States gave him during the Iraq/Iran war. If anyone remembers, the USA supported Saddam Hussein in that war with weapons.

So, when Bush flew his big lie about weapons of mass destruction on the back of the credibility of the sadly sycophantic Colin Powell, I knew it was a lie.

By then, I had also googled the US deficit as a function of time and understood that all of the shrill proclamations by Ronald Reagan that he would "cut spending" were a lie and that he had burned up $2 Trillion in deficit spending (in 1986 dollars) after a long postwar period of responsible spending by every President. Including Jimmy Carter who not only ran a balanced budget but continued to pay down the postwar debt.

So, at the dawn of the Iraq invasion I understood that I had been duped by the Republican Party beginning with my reading of George Will and William F. Buckley's propaganda.

I exited the Republican Party and have been trying to shower off the dirt and grime and decay of my votes for Reagan, Bush I and Bush II (W).

It really is amazing what propaganda can do with the minds of sincere people who are reading that propaganda for the first time in cultures where those young people are surrounded by people that mostly tell the truth. When a big lie comes along, it is very hard to see.

It took me, a guy who appeared to everyone as intelligent, many, many years to shake off the propaganda and get to the truth.

Republicans foist big lies all the time, and, that started in earnest with Ronald Reagan's big lie of "cutting spending".

Reagan never did cut any spending, never meant to cut spending and lied about cutting spending for 8 years.

Expand full comment

As a wife, mother, sister, and daughter of Aggies, and a life-long Texas resident, my journey is very similar to yours. I never voted for a Democratic president until Obama’s 2nd term….read Buckley and all…even listened to Rush. After much discussion, reading, and thinking I came to see the dirt, grime, and decay that has surrounded our country for most of my life. My husband and I feel like strangers in a strange land here in SE Texas, and most of my friends think I have gone off the deep end. While watching Morning Joe this morning, Kevin McCarthy, when asked by reporters if he and the the former discussed his choices for the January 6th committee. He said no. That simple statement which I believe to be an outright lie, sums up everything to me. Lies….”An Aggie does not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those that do”. It’s the lies upon lies…outright lies….tolerated lies...that cause me the most pain, anger, sense of helplessness, disgust…….

Expand full comment

Well Deborah. In what McCarthy has shown us, he didn’t lie when he said there was no discussion of choices for the committee. The former gave him the list of 5 and that was that. McCarthy slithered out then back to his office to announce “his” picks.

Expand full comment

First. Gig Em AGGIES.

😊

I am from around Palestine, Tx. But. I finally finished up school as Texas went into its oil and S&L disaster.

No jobs in TX pushed me up to Rochester.

Sometimes I miss my old hay hauling buddies and the culture of my youth down there.

All good guys.

Expand full comment

I registered as Repub only because my folks were & knew no better! From then on voted for Dems, but did finally switch after TFG was elected - what a shocker that was and quite honestly STILL is. Hope there are lots of Repubs out there who have seen the light because will need them in 22 and even more in 24!

Expand full comment

I have a similar History with the Republican Party except my family was solid Republican and I was just a Republican by assumption and inheritance.

But my allegiance to the party brought me into conflict when I studied History and Government at UB in the late 1950’s. The incredible role of Government under FDR was irresistible and irrefutable evidence the party clung to discounted theory was obvious.

But when Ronald Reagan announced his candidacy with huge party support in Philadelphia,Mississippi, where the three civil rights martyrs were lynched ended the party for me.

Since then what was mostly antipathy has grown to downright antagonism as I have watched the Party founded by Abe Lincoln promote disastrous candidates, downright racist promotions and feeble economic theory.

I think as a former Republican I have seen the party disintegrate itself to satisfy the ignorant and the prejudiced. It seems, during this Pandemic, with the ridiculous acceptance of sickness and death rather than vaccines the party members ascribe to this macabre reality.

Expand full comment

Hap, the first sentence of your final paragraph dums up perfectly today's 'leading' Republicans.

Expand full comment

Sums up....

Expand full comment

you could apply the dums up to the Rs tho.

Expand full comment

I love a good malapropism.

Expand full comment

I like a good slit of the tongue.

Expand full comment

Those 6 Jan. perpatraitors never get ‘em.

Expand full comment

Feeble economic theory….well put.

Expand full comment

It takes a person with a set of critical thinking skills to be able to say "hey, wait a minute; it isn't exactly like that". Thank you for both the "come around" and your story about it.

Expand full comment

Critical thinking skills used to be taught in school when our stated objective was to create life long learners. *sigh*

Expand full comment

Well, Mike, we all can hope that a lot more people like you have the good sense to abandon the mythology that Republicans give a damn about the public health, safety and the commonwealth. It's all being played out over the absurd "freedom-of-choice" statements made by Republicans nationwide, by the vote suppression measures, and by opposing teaching Black history. Reminds me of the cartoon .... some dimwit teacher, adhering to the new politically correct version of history, is at the podium speaking, with a large sign "Slavery Chapter": "After getting free passage to American, they immediately received jobs!" And so it goes.

Expand full comment

Regarding teaching history: I spent a fair bit of time in history classes but I never really learned much at all.

Only later in life did my own interest drive a bit of learning.

Then. A friend of mine pointed me to something called “Letters from an American. Said I might like it.

First, I looked up HCR to see if she was really a Professor. She was. But. I saw a book “To Maje Men Free: A History of the Republican Party.

Reading that book is not for the faint of heart. It is dense and moves along.

But. When I finished I marveled at he Huge amount of history I had been completely ignorant about. Amazing really.

Now? I read her letter every day. I roped one of my sisters in too.

Expand full comment

Thank goodness i had a teacher who brought history alive with humor and personal stories! But the others only made us memorize dates of wars and peace treaties, land acquisitions, names of generals…. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Expand full comment

You think it’s a cartoon, but it’s actually taught that way in Texas textbooks.

Expand full comment

Of course it is! But it's still a cartoon. :)

Expand full comment

Thanks for writing. This is an important story.

Expand full comment

Thank you. The story supports HCR's observation that in 1980, driven by William F. Buckley's well written nonsense, the Republican Party was "solidly" in the hands of people who demonized everyone but their corporate donors. At that time, everyone but their corporate donors was defined as "Communists".

Expand full comment

To add: I can see myself, now at 61, in the long arc of HCR's historical summary. I was fooled by William F. Buckley's writings. Now, in retrospect, I wonder what college administrator chose George Will and William F. Buckley as those writers who would meld our young minds to the Republican Party?

Expand full comment

The Republican obsession with branding everybody but rich donors as "Communists" reaches further back than St. Raygun. My late father, WWII veterans of the submarine war in the Pacific, was an Eisenhower Republican, his younger brother a foaming at the mouth Bircher, who got sucked into their perfidy around 1960. The closest they ever came to actual blows was the day my Uncle called President Eisenhower a Communist. I think I was around 14 at the time.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Mike, for sharing this. Unfortunately, the second you turn on your computers the slime starts pouring out. The gullible are defenseless against Republican lies. The American spine is crumbling.

Expand full comment

Mr. Watson, thank you for reading. I appreciate your time and observation.

I never had time for Facebook when I was working, and, now that I am "retired", but, own a small farm in upstate NY, I remain somewhat distracted from activity that is not some form of education. HCR's page is one of only three entities I interact with online. 1) NY Times, 2) HCR daily writing, 3) two motorcycle forums, one for Kawasaki, one for Suzuki, mostly associated with mechanic work I do on my aging motorcycles. 4) The Department of Environment Conservations Reforestation efforts which I am a part of. :-)

Everyone involved in the above four on-line entities is polite, helpful and I learn something when I participate.

Facebook, honestly, since they don't have much on history, mechanics of motorcycles, or any information on reforestation and invasive species management, which I am doing a lot of, well, I just never "took" to it so to speak.

Expand full comment

I think it's a good point that what you'll find depends on where you look.( I apologize if I'm making a wrong assumption here, Mike S.) When HCR talked about online rudeness yesterday, I was thinking that I have heard of that, but have not seen it enough to really be concerned. I am bothered by comments such as the above that "the American spine is crumbling" because I think you'll see that if you look for it. I mean no disrespect Mr. Watson. I see a lot of nice people, a lot of concerned people, and I see a majority of people having voted for Biden. I see a majority of people supporting Biden's policies. And I believe, as the population grows older, and the aging Trump supporters (and Trump himself) succumb , that our majority will increase. Do I have hard evidence for this? No. But just because Trump supporters and anti-government folks have come out of the woodwork and are louder, does not mean there are more of them. I welcome thoughts here.

Expand full comment

Kim, I think one of the crucial differences between Democrats and Republicans is that the Republican political machine is willing to out and out lie and drive their lies home using a sledge hammer. The Democrats, on the other hand are at a disadvantage because they lack the tendency to use hyperbole and theatrics. People who are willing to scream and shriek, with spittle flying and veins popping from their foreheads stir up anger, anxiety and fear. Somehow, Democrats need to develop a strong, cohesive and compelling message that penetrates the hard shell encasing the on the fence voters without stooping to hyperbole and scare tactics. A kumbaya moment will not suffice right now.

Expand full comment

Overall, Democrats have been unwilling to speak truth to power. The few progressive Democrats that have spoken out are in the minority and they are "shouted" down.

The underlying problem in politics is the candidate that is well funded and cozies up to the wealthy are the ones that prevail more often than not. We all know that the progressives are the exceptions but their message is drowned out by the incessant cacophony of the "own the libs" fanatical right, and the own and paid for Democratic corporate centrists who are weakened by triangulating messaging.

I agree Democrats must unite with a compelling message of hope and prosperity for all. The goal should be to reverse income and wealth inequality and give everyone a livable wage and an opportunity to advance based on their merits and hard work. Some people can't be helped, but that doesn't mean their lives should be one of misery and destitution. There's plenty to go around and helping the most disadvantaged, helps everyone. That's a winning message that the wealthy don't want people to hear or believe in.

Expand full comment

Don, you said, "I agree Democrats must unite with a compelling message of hope and prosperity for all". The sooner the better, too. The one advantage Republicans have over democrats is that, as a body, they are willing to stand behind and amplify any dubious message "crafted" by the former president, right wing pundits and lawmakers. Democrats and Progressives are wasting precious time. Midterms are not that far off and we, are not floating a strong cohesive message about anything.

Expand full comment

Agreed Daria. And most disturbing is that people have been so brainwashed that they no longer act in their own self interest. We need a message that can overcome a relentless disinformation campaign. No small task.

Expand full comment

Morning Diane, a FL friend. How about this message first which can then be followed with typical Dem grassroots messaging with little hyperbole.

“Kill the f-ing filibuster”.

Expand full comment

Competing with the Reptiles is non-

productive. Think if the fable about the race between the tortoise and the hare.

Expand full comment

Susan, you bring up a good point. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Kim, I think that , yes, if I had a point, your observation is correct, in my comment about the four main sites I ever interact with.

Most of the folks I interact with are folks that mostly avoid overtly causing pain to others, and the websites I interact with are sort of associated with groups trying to accomplish something together or working on older mechanical systems where parts are hard to find.

In my real life of real people, well, I brought along a few people over the years that are my friends, my family, and fellow older guys (am 61) who started doing mechanical stuff as teenagers.

They are all polite because, well, who cannot love a Suzuki 199 SV650 with no EFI and no chips to go bad? Gotta smile when they see mine.

:-)

Expand full comment

Not sure what that last paragraph meant, but I'll take your word for it! :)

Expand full comment

Look for a group

Liberal Greybeard Bikers on Facebook

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

Not so fast, Randy. The American spine is still there: it just needs some muscle in the right places, and some galloping blah blah (ginko biloba) for the brains. The worst of us always gets in the news. The best of us voted Democrat in 2020.

Expand full comment

You are among MANY that were duped. My late husband made the big switchover in the 70's and never looked back.

Expand full comment

Essentially correct. 100%.

Expand full comment

Mike, sounds like you got to where you are today by looking at the data and thinking for yourself. Do you have any suggestions for how to get more people today who are being duped by propaganda to do the same? Educating them about the facts clearly isn't enough. They also have to think for themselves. That's the hurdle in front of social change.

Expand full comment

You are correct. Correct in all aspects. Reagan lied, his dad was a drunk, as was his first wife. My boss Donald T. Regan figured it out and Nancy fired him. The GOP since Eisenhower, exception Ford, has lied. IKE lied about Gary Francis Powers and he chose Richard M. Nixon, a man he deeply mistrusted. He was threatened by Robert Taft.

Expand full comment

I sure do hope there are a whole lot of you whose eyes are now wide open. We need them, or we lose our Democratic government.

Expand full comment

It's interesting that you mention those two names.

George Will never made any sense to me. And I was blessed by never having encountered William F. Buckley, Jr. in my early life. The first time I saw him was just a few years back, in a televised "debate" between him and a very young Noam Chomsky: the most on-point comment in the whole interminable program was when Chomsky asked Buckley -- interrupting Buckley's interruption -- "Are you going to let me finish a sentence?" Buckley, in that interview, gave the appearance of a man on drugs, or at the least, very drunk.

Expand full comment

Sadly, you are probably right. The content and interactions were informing for this liberal . Not the adherence to his viewpoints.

Expand full comment

Raised in a strong Republican family and some how I bent toward the liberal side of my mind. I have been alone in my native family ever since. They are conservatives, not in the Lincoln sense, though they don't realize such. Throughout my college years I followed Bill Buckley on Meet the Press (?) for his elegant arguing and later George Will after his divorce from Madaline. My reason for doing so was to track on conservative thought without having to dig through the babble coming across AM radio and the Chicago Trib. I think they kept me clear on the importance of the new deal and helped me grasp how important government was to enabling good but imperfect solutions to problems surrounding common goods, such as posed in the Declaration of Independence and Lincoln's hopes. Nothing like a clearly articulated viewpoint (Buckley's rapier taunts) to force one to carefully articulate one's own, even if only to ones self. 24/7 media like Fox and MSN have too much chaf for my liking.

Expand full comment

Dear Prof. HCR,

Yours is a rich and thoughtful assessment as always! Thank you! The first thing that popped into my head upon reading what Brian Kilmeade had said was: Really?!! Pray tell, then why, in your skewed view, is government allowed to control women's bodies?!!!

Nothing the pro-45 Republicans do or say shocks me anymore, but Kevin McCarthy's chutzpah is beyond belief -- putting forward the names of sideline mutineers and Big Lie paracletes to represent his party on the committee looking into the 6th Jan. insurrection! Good grief! What next? And when will they learn that their job is to improve things for their constituents rather than aim to disrupt every single bill put forward by the Democrats -- even after some have taken the credit for the advancements made by the opposition through the American Rescue Plan. Their hypocrisy boggles the mind!

Expand full comment

THIS!!

"Pray tell, then why, in [Kilmeade's] skewed view, is government allowed to control women's bodies?!!! Why, indeed?!"

Expand full comment

I find that a very good question - too bad the gal on that show didnt ask it. But then doubt shes allowed an opinion - especially a different one.

Expand full comment

Seems to me like no one on the witness list should serve on the commission.

Expand full comment

Amen!

Expand full comment

I think I read that 2 or 3 of them DID vote to certify the election tho. Surprise, surprise!

Expand full comment

2 of them did.

Expand full comment

Well, I dont believe theres much point in installing election deniers on this commission. Especially if they encouraged the insurrection.

Expand full comment

I think there is no point in the installing of any of former’s choices.

Expand full comment

I dont either - werent there 10 Repubs who DID agree to certify the election? Why not pick 5 of them. I hope Pelosi doesnt just go along with McCarthy.

Expand full comment

Like, Government 101. Shouldn't legislators have taken the class in high school?

Expand full comment

Thank heavens Speaker Pelosi has the veto on McCarthy's appointments. I expect at least 2 will be rejected. The mental image of Jordan yelling & disrupting the process is horrifying.

Expand full comment

As I said above, I am thinking more and more that they are not even hypocritical. Because they don't really care about anything but power. So everything they say, is just a campaign slogan. It's not what they believe or even care about. In that vein of thinking, I would love to have a really skilled interviewer sit down with Mitch or Jim Jordan or Lindsey and see what makes then cry. Ask about their childhood, their parents, their school, their children. Get to the heart of the people. They have hearts somewhere deep deep under the calloused layers. What happened to those hearts? What made them crave power and money to the point they support a man like Trump? My belief is that A LOT of people (my self included!) need therapy in this country.

Expand full comment

Because they saw that the country was becoming so diverse that they would never win another election unless they rigged it, because they are rascists, because they were just waiting for someone like TFG to come along to allow them to vent anger at economic upheavals of recent years, and because they can. They are running with their emotions, not their minds, and their hearts were torn asunder years ago leaving them in pain and fear.

Expand full comment

Racists

Expand full comment

May I suggest: the publican of an interesting book, “Brown is the New White” by Steve Phillips, published in 2016. The sub-title must strike fear in Trump and Party’s minions:

“ How the Demographic Revolution has created a New American Majority”.

Expand full comment

Too deep, too far gone. They are shell people now.

Expand full comment

They act like old abused children who are ashamed abd being blackmailed.

Expand full comment

I think you are right about them not being hypicritical - they are just money machines.

Expand full comment

And we have all known ppl who continued to set aside their own best interest for the sake of digging in, like a 4 y/o who continues his tantrum after being told he’ll get his way after all.

Expand full comment

Rowshan, in the (present) Republican view it is the primary function of government to protect personal property. Women are property, chattel, which must be controlled to be truly possessed.

We will all have to get used to this nightmare of social rescidivism from “The Handmaids Tale” if we are not effective in stopping it now.

Expand full comment

Republicans are replete with endless hypocrisy. When you have a political party that has no other ideology beyond serving the needs and wants of their wealthy donors and "owning the libs" then lies, misinformation and hypocrisy are to be expected. Unfortunately, our political system is rigged for the minority to succeed. As HCR said, the Republicans have an easy job - obstruction wins the day.

Expand full comment

Don, you are spot on.,

Expand full comment

Doesn’t boggle my mind. It’s pure political oppositional intent. McCarthy does all to set himself up to take Pelosi’s gavel next year.

Expand full comment

Good morning Riwshan!

Expand full comment

Rowshan😁

Expand full comment

And a very good morning to you, Christine!

Expand full comment

Some clever young marketing people need to be saving all these sound bites for use in campaign ads in the near future.

Expand full comment

Yes!

Expand full comment

Someone said they need to grow up.

Expand full comment

Paraclete: Paraclete (Greek: παράκλητος, Latin: paracletus) means advocate or helper. In Christianity, the term "paraclete" most commonly refers to the Holy Spirit. Fun new word for me!

Expand full comment

Yes, I looked it up as well. It looked vaguely familiar but I couldn't have defined it.

Expand full comment

Talk about putting foxes in charge of the henhouse...this one takes the prize.

Expand full comment

Rowshan, Great and deep down analogy regarding Republican duplicity with regard to 'freedom'. I think McCarthy performs for Trump and his base, fully aware of where his selections are going -- down, down, down!

Expand full comment

Rowshan, This evening I learned that it is likely that Pelosi will accept McCarthy's choices for the Commission. She may believe that the commission can do its job with one or two bombs and, perhaps, wants to avoid the political fallout from the Republicans if she rejects one or two. Pelosi is very capable. Of course, I hope she's right and that the Democrats aren't settling for a bad hand, which is something we are all too familiar with.

Expand full comment

I hope that, as you say, "she's right," but my gut tells me that it's an exceedingly dicey move which might ruin the entire process. Keeping everything crossed!

Expand full comment

I feel exactly as you do.

Expand full comment

Gym Jordan? Are you effing kidding me?

Expand full comment

So, if we're invaded by a foreign military, it's every citizen's personal choice what to do about it.

Whew! I'm glad that's settled. Now I understand why so many citizens are building personal armories in their homes. I thought it was because they were nuts.

We don't need the Defense Dept. anymore. Think of the savings! (Think of the unemployment!)

Yet these people think defense spending is the holiest of holies.

How much longer can this cognitive dissonance, this in-your-face insanity, keep going on?

Expand full comment

Republicans have had the same game plan for the last 50 years; true, it has been more audacious the last 20 years, and the last four years have been flat-out full-blown fascism. It is hard to explain why the good can't overcome the evil, but when it's all about money and the wealthy have money to burn, it's easy for them to orchestrate a divide and conquer strategy to gain complete control over our lives.

As HCR said, "all the Republicans have to do is stop the Democrats." All they have to do is vilify the majority of the population to succeed. So, to answer your question Ralph the insanity could go on indefinitely, I suppose, but the heart and soul of the country are so broken, I fear we are rapidly coming to a disastrous end.

The fact that 600,000 Americans have died as the result of primarily Republican-led malfeasance, and there is no uproar, speaks volumes about our dire situation! What's worse is that profound changes in politics, governing, the Constitution, and most of all our laissez-faire capitalistic system must take place for there to be any hope of solving and correcting the greatest threats to mankind's survival. Going forward, I fear it will be too little, too late. Between now and then, we'll be locked in an endless blame game devoid of facts and common sense.

Expand full comment

I am more optimistic, Don, though I can see no evidence why I should be.

Thanks for such a thoughtful response to my post.

Expand full comment

Ralph, as long as Republicans stoke fear and anger, they can short circuit critical thinking. This madness is deliberate.

Expand full comment

Ralph, Quite a long time, I'm afraid. Nothing faster than stupid.

Expand full comment

A long time, prolly

Expand full comment

Stand up comic. Get a program! Fabulous.

Expand full comment

The Preamble to the Constitution describes civilization. There must be constraints on behavior to protect the vulnerable or NO ONE is safe. Everyone is only an accident or illness away from being helpless. The R’s want the wild, Wild West where anything goes. The people who occupy today’s R party are NOT the party of Lincoln; they have a mindset like the old south planters. Freedom does not mean I have the right to take advantage of my neighbor in order to advance my own ends.

Expand full comment

"Freedom does not mean I have the right to take advantage of my neighbor in order to advance my own ends."

Thank you, this is truth.

Expand full comment

"Mans capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary.". Niebuhr

Expand full comment

Evidently if you can lie, cheat, steal and rape, and "even shoot someone on 5th Ave and get away with it", and have complicit police, complicit judges, and brainwashed followers, that's exactly what it means. You can do, whatever the hell you want.

Expand full comment

Excellent observation.

Expand full comment

If it is not government's job to protect, then why is the Pentagon's budget more than $700 billion?

Expand full comment

In the right's worldview, the Pentagon budget is to protect commerce and private property and support corporations that produce arms. Also DARPA is for basic research that for-profit corporations can then exploit.

Expand full comment

It's all about the money folks. The culture war is just a front to seduce the credulous.

Expand full comment

Yep, and then follow it. The money, that is. ;)

Expand full comment

Exactly my thoughts. I was going to say

It but I am getting worn out

Expand full comment

a political scheme to funnel money to the congress-military-industrial complex

Expand full comment

"Brian Kilmeade answered that not getting the vaccine is a personal choice and that the government has no role in protecting the population. “That’s not their job. It’s not their job to protect anybody,” he said." It looks like we have found who really wants to defund the police. It is Brian Kilmeade and those who share his views.

Expand full comment

He must also be pro-choice, glad to have him onboard!

Expand full comment

Ha!

Expand full comment

Ha! Good point! The party of hypocrisy. Although I'm not even sure that's true. It just looks true. They really don't care about anything but staying in power it seems. Arguing about funding the police is just a useful campaign slogan.

Expand full comment

Look he has a contract with a performance clause that gives him more compensation based on the number of dumb shit things he says. Simple motivation /s

Expand full comment

BK having a playground brawl with Carlson. At America’s expense.

Expand full comment

He’s espousing lawlessness. What a shock!

Expand full comment

The foxes are going to serve on the committee to protect the hen house? As far as I can see Jim Jordan and his comrades should be charged with insurrection.

Expand full comment

I’m disgusted at the vision I have from the past of Jim Jordan wrestling coach par excellence hell bent on disrupting this important work— I hope whoever is moderating the forum is very strict with time limits.

Expand full comment

I don't think that Pelosi will agree to Jordan.

Expand full comment

I hope not. All he does is harangue ppl.

Expand full comment

During the impeachments, every time his voice came on my blood pressure skyrocketed!

Expand full comment

I believe that she will do everything in her power for this investigation to be the truth to power. It is crucial.

Expand full comment

Hey Kim me too— I’ll have to meditate in between sittings.

Expand full comment

Haha. Good plan!

Expand full comment

I thought he just got to pick 3 and it’s a done deal.

Expand full comment

She has the right of approval.

Expand full comment

Oh! Good. I can’t stand Jim roll his sleeves up Jordan.

Expand full comment

😂 Roll his sleeves up Jordan! 😂🤣😂

Expand full comment

You provided a picture and a good laugh. Thanks, Liz.

Expand full comment

Liz, I have very recent news, which you will not be happy with. 'House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy appointed Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Banks to lead Republicans on the Jan. 6 select committee, but his position and the four other GOP picks are contingent on Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s approval'.

'If Pelosi signs off on McCarthy’s picks, Banks would serve as ranking member and would be joined on the panel to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol attack by Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota and Troy Nehls of Texas.' (Roll Call) My understanding is that Pelosi will accept these picks. With the exception of Jordan, these are not the bottom of the barrel. What can I say! Pelosi probably thinks that one bomb or even too, won't sabotage the investigation. I will copy this to another interested subscriber.

Expand full comment

Not to mention he's so aggressive, abrasive and LOUD whenever he speaks about anything... I can't imagine having to work with that creature. <cringing>

Expand full comment

I have very recent news, which you will not be happy about. 'House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy appointed Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Banks to lead Republicans on the Jan. 6 select committee, but his position and the four other GOP picks are contingent on Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s approval'.

'If Pelosi signs off on McCarthy’s picks, Banks would serve as ranking member and would be joined on the panel to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol attack by Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota and Troy Nehls of Texas.' (Roll Call) My understanding is that Pelosi will accept these picks. With the exception of Jordan, these are not the bottom of the barrel. What can I say! Pelosi probably thinks that one bomb or even too, won't sabotage the investigation.

Expand full comment

Pelosi will veto Jordan's appointment. But the alpointment is beyond dusgusting.

Expand full comment

I see a wagging digit behind McCarthy selection.

Expand full comment

I agree. With him on the committee it will become a sideshow at the circus.

Expand full comment

Sideshows are supposed to make people laugh— Jordan makes me cringe repeatedly and he’ll always keep butting in.

Expand full comment

Pelosi has power to reject nominations. She will axe Jordan.

Expand full comment

I wonder what happens when information about their participation arise? I think that might be a big conflict of interest.

Expand full comment

Viewed from afar, one can only marvel at the fact that these men have been walking free every day since January 6th. And now they are being used to pile insult onto injury.

I'm reminded of how terrorist masterminds have used psychopaths to commit atrocities against innocent citizens. The ruthless cynicism is the same, the difference is a matter of degree. These people scare me, and we should all be scared by the pseudo-normality of their freedom to strut around the House they tried to overthrow as though they still owned the place... As though they owned all fellow Americans... except those who own them.

Expand full comment

This really is not what Brian Kilmeade or Steve Doucy, or what any of the other flapping mouths over at Fox News has to say on his own personal time. This is a Rupert Murdoch operation, and they say whatever the Boss tells them to say. The sheer vacuity of morals and intellect over at Fox has been well known for decades, whether was Roger Ailes or Bill O'Reilly, or any of the other creeps that inhabited the place over time, it has all the same. People over there have the mental acuity of a 12-year-old bully, and the morals to match. Fox's broadcasting format is perfectly calibrated to appeal to life's losers and people whose compass and life has been irretrievably broken: easily fooled; easily led; gullible; trusting to a fault and those who simply do not care what the subject is that the conversation is about. It is all about getting their emotions steamed up into overdrive, as if it is the only way the viewers can convince themselves that they are still alive and feeling something. Truly, it is a nursing home for the mind for people whose cognitive facility is barely alive.

Expand full comment

Love the line: sheer vacuity of morals and intellect.

We are surrounded by those who received their medical and law degrees from Fox & Friend University School of Law / Medicine

Expand full comment

And note that the Fox & Friends University lacks courses in Ethics or the humanities...

Expand full comment

Up vote for "Truly, it is a nursing home for the mind for people whose cognitive facility is barely alive".

Expand full comment

Preach artsilen!!

Expand full comment

Perfect description, Artsilen! EPIC!!!

Expand full comment

I would love to share this description with friends.

Expand full comment

I would, but after HCR's question last night about our angry society, I don't dare.

Expand full comment

Good morning Heather, good morning all! When did roughly half of US Americans decide that doing something for the common good was repugnant? During WWII Americans were asked to sacrifice and participate in a rationing program so that goods and raw materials could be funneled to the War Effort. This effort came hard on the heels of the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl. Today, with the succesful development of several effective vaccines, we'rpve been asked to safeguard ourselves, our families, friends and communities, against Covid 19. We're able to receive the vaccine with zero dollars out of pocket. And yet, millions of Americans are choosing to reject the vaccine and watch infection rates rise.

I found this short essay from the National Park Service reminding us of a time when Americans were willing to consider their neighbor, community and the country as a whole. They believed that acting for the common good was an act of patriotism. Hard times are certainly easier on everyone when we act in concert to achieve a goal that will benefit us all.

"On August 28, 1941, President Roosevelt’s Executive Order 8875 created the Office of Price Administration (OPA). The OPA’s main responsibility was to place a ceiling on prices of most goods, and to limit consumption by rationing.

Americans received their first ration cards in May 1942. The first card, War Ration Card Number One, became known as the “Sugar Book,” for one of the commodities Americans could purchase with their ration card. Other ration cards developed as the war progressed. Ration cards included stamps with drawings of airplanes, guns, tanks, aircraft, ears of wheat and fruit, which were used to purchase rationed items.

The OPA rationed automobiles, tires, gasoline, fuel oil, coal, firewood, nylon, silk, and shoes. Americans used their ration cards and stamps to take their meager share of household staples including meat, dairy, coffee, dried fruits, jams, jellies, lard, shortening, and oils.

Americans learned, as they did during the Great Depression, to do without. Sacrificing certain items during the war became the norm for most Americans. It was considered a common good for the war effort, and it affected every American household."

https://www.nps.gov/articles/rationing-in-wwii.htm

https://www.nps.gov/articles/rationing-in-wwii.htm

Expand full comment

My grandmother had three small children during the war, and all of their ration cards went to shoes for the children. She didn’t have a new pair of shoes for years, and she loved shoes. She made up for it after the war - she must have had 100 pairs of shoes!

Expand full comment

My mom always said when she was a kid on their Minnesota farm they never noticed The Depression because they grew or made everything. But when she died I bet she had over 100 pairs of shoes, too! They didn't make shoes on The Farm.

Expand full comment

💟!

Expand full comment

Huzzah for your grandmother! I love it! I can just see the smile on her face putting on that first pair of long awaited new shoes!

My grandfather spent the war in a communications unit in Alaska. My grandmother worked for the Department of War in DC and lived in a apartment, with my mom and uncle, across the street from Walter Reed. As kids, we were fascinated to see the neighborhood stores where they turned in their coupons for goods, just a few years earlier. Too, my maternal family was fortunate to have a small family farm in Ohio which helped ease some of the hardships. Thankfully, ours was a close knit family.

Expand full comment

Where in Ohio?

Expand full comment

Cambridge.

Expand full comment

We've not we'rpve!

Expand full comment

Read Alistair Cooke "The Home Front 1941 1942" - where he discusses this - wonderful book - boy have things changed!

Expand full comment

Hugh, I ordered the e book. Thanks for your recommendation.

Expand full comment

Morning Daria. Stellar.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Christine. I recouping from maxilofacial surgery so I've had way youth to much time on my hands the last couple days 😐. Have a good evening!

Expand full comment

Mix in some light reading and some good music and perhaps a comedy if you like the telly. Things pretty heavy in the forum landscape lately.

Heal. Blessings.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I've been listening to audio books, The Cemetery of Forgotten Books series, by Carlos Luis Zafón and binge watching Lupin on Netflix. Lupin is delightful. I'd read some of the books so it's been fun seeing the character updated to the 21st century.

Expand full comment

“When did roughly half of US Americans decide that doing something for the common good was repugnant?” That would be in 1954, when white Americans found out that black people would have to be among the beneficiaries of the common good. It didn’t worry them too much until the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts became law in the mid sixties. Now, they are pressing the advantages the Constitution gives them to preserve white rule. Stopping them is a tall order.

Expand full comment

Yes, when white anti-communist decided we were, among other things, One Nation Under God. Revolting.

Expand full comment

A Great Depression and a World War. Rationing. So we should go along with the $6 trillion for the common good. Really. Joe’s mandate. And wonder, do you think Joe should enlist DT to appeal to his followers to get vaccinated? Incredibly Kamala is on record saying she would never get one. 70 % was Joe’s goal. Failure. We’re at 50%. What should we do?

Expand full comment

David, lets start with your comment in re VP Harris saying she would never get a vaccine. You have entirely misquoted and misrepresented her in your attempt to stir the pot. Here is the direct quote:

"Asked by CNN's Dana Bash in a clip released Saturday whether she would get a vaccine that was approved and distributed before the election, Harris replied, "Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us."

"I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about," she continued in the clip from an exclusive interview airing Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" at 9 a.m. ET. "I will not take his word for it."

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/05/politics/kamala-harris-not-trust-trump-vaccine-cnntv/index.html

Do I think Biden should enlist Trump's help to achieve his 70% vaccine goal? Frankly, no. Why? After 8 months of Trump denying the results of the 2020 election, he lacks any semblance of credibility, thus on a believability scale of 1-10 he's at a minus 5. If Trump was a leader, he would get on his soapbox, of his own volition, and urge is supporters to take the vaccine. Trump is the one that turned the covid response into a political football.

"Harris’ comments come as several drugmakers developing vaccines are working on a joint pledge not to seek government approval for the shots until they have been proven safe and effective, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. The unusual move comes amid widespread concern that Trump could seek to prod companies into making any prospective vaccine available before it is ready."

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-usa-politics-idUSKBN25X01L

In re the 6 trillion dollars for the common good. Again you misrepresent facts and figures. Here is an accurate representation of Biden's plan:

April 30 (Reuters) - "In his first 100 days in office, President Joe Biden has offered up roughly $6 trillion in spending proposals and so far has delivered on roughly a third of it.

His plans cover a range of policy goals: Lifting the economy out of the COVID-19 recession; restoring blue collar jobs; beefing up critical U.S. infrastructure; levying higher taxes on corporations and the wealthiest Americans; securing affordable child care for American families."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/joe-bidens-6-trillion-ambition-2021-04-30

It pays to do your homework, David. Have a nice Tuesday

Expand full comment

We can disagree but Biden’s plan is radical, insanely expensive and untimely. $6 trillion, 1.8% growth, command economy. A Bolivarian dream mixed with stories of FDR. QE, MMT and UBI rolled into one.

Expand full comment

Oy, David! No more expensive than the ridiculous, decades long neglect and gutting frenzy the Republicans embarked on from Reagan forward. Maybe I'm mistaken but I don't recall anyone suggesting we move to a command economy. Shame on you for trying to pull a fast one, or maybe you're unclear about the definition of command economy. Just saying...

Expand full comment

You have the patience of Job, Daria! IMHO, you'll never reach people like David because he's living in an alternate reality of his own making. I appreciate your efforts and I do learn from your comments - so, thank you!!

Expand full comment

It seems to me that DC, like many who watch FOX, have become alienated from the world.

Expand full comment

Don, many thanks. You are very kind.

Expand full comment

"Vice President-elect Kamala Harris received a COVID-19 vaccination on Dec. 28, 2020 on live television in an effort to boost public confidence in immunizations (here)." I remember seeing this on the news several times. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-kamala-harris-covid-vaccina-idUSKBN29A2K7

Expand full comment

Charlie Pierce is definitely right that Faux and Friends is more properly "Three Dolts On A Divan."

Expand full comment

😂😂

Expand full comment

We are now at the fork in the road of America's experiment with democracy. It was both fitting and astonishing that a clash between a pro government and anti government positions were strongly expressed on one of our crown jewels of misinformation, Fox News. So, is Government to be or not to be?

In the last forty years our country has moved swiftly ahead, chugged and sputtered. Technology reigns, with the industrial Midwest on its knees. Main Streets went from bustling to bleak, left with one or two churches, a diner, a bar and not much more to see. Dark Money, anti-government, anti-taxes and anti-regulations movements, gun ownership and militias have all been prominent as the transfer of the country's wealth from the people to the super-rich, stagnant wages, political corruption and social division darken the way.

Misinformation, propaganda and conspiracy theories emanating from political radio, Fox News and Social Media have been embedded in the minds of many Americans. During the former president's term brutal attacks on civility, the rule of law, human decency, governmental functions; public health; truth, honesty, ethics and freedom of the press were incessant. The Republican Party served his every whim and abuse and 600 thousand souls died of Covid, many unnecessarily.

Less than a year ago, Joseph R. Biden, former Vice President and long serving Senator of Delaware, became the president of the United States. It was a huge relief to most Americans. We are ready to support and expand voters' rights and American families; affordable higher education; modern and high functioning roads and bridges, mass transit, clean and efficient water systems; wage increases; significant acts to address climate change...we are ready!

Heather summed up America's position, "In today’s struggle over the nature of government, the Democrats are at a disadvantage. They want to use the government to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty, just as Lincoln and FDR and Eisenhower advocated. To drive their individualist vision, though, all the Republicans have to do is stop the Democrats.

Here we are.

Expand full comment

In response to HCR's statement, "To drive their individualist vision, though, all the Republicans have to do is stop the Democrats", my loaded question is simply: "Why then do Republicans always seem to manage to stop--discourage, flummox--Democrats, when the Democrats always seem to be powerless to stop Republicans?" Something ain't right somewhere.

Expand full comment

I wish that I could unload you, Bruce. In order to remain calm and muzzle my words eager to hit the screen, I will not unload myself about the Democratic Party.

Expand full comment

Fern, You are speaking the truth. Indeed, the time is near for a decision. Is it going to be the "ME" or the "WE". It is time to pay more attention to the wisdom of our forebearers. The "Fifth World" is emerging. https://www.aaanativearts.com/emergence-to-the-5th-world-a-hopi-prophecy. Be pure of heart.

Expand full comment

Charlie. First summer full moon on July 23. The Full Buck Moon. I’m getting every healing crystal I have gathered to get that moon energy that night.

Expand full comment

I'm on it. Time to re-charge those puppies.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Charlie. I will read the 'Fifth World' this afternoon. More wisdom is needed.

Expand full comment

Men versus man

Expand full comment

I tried to read your recommendation- got lost at the link :(

Expand full comment

Yes. And it sucks for America.

Expand full comment

We'll vacuum and spit them out!

Expand full comment

Hopefully using a Biden Dyson.

Expand full comment

This message from Abraham Lincoln needs to go out across the country by text, email, air waves, social media and in person. It needs to be repeated verbatim and it needs to be phrased in a hundred other ways:

“The legitimate object of government is ‘to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they can not, by individual effort, do at all, or do so well, for themselves.’…Making and maintaining roads, bridges, and the like; providing for the helpless young and afflicted; common schools; and disposing of deceased men's property, are instances.”

Expand full comment

And all should send it to Kilmeade. A torrent of voices-

Expand full comment

The truly horrifying thing is not that Brian Kilmeade is clearly ignorant as to the contents of the Constitution (That doesn’t surprise me in the least), it’s that millions will now repeat what he has said as the virtual gospel.

Expand full comment

Sad, sad, sad...

Expand full comment

Sad and ultimately extremely dangerous!

Expand full comment

Yesterday on NPR I heard Roy Cooper, the Democratic Governor of North Carolina say that although private colleges could require vaccines for students, he doubted whether the state could require vaccines for the UNC and NCState systems.

You may remember that Cooper’s election prompted the Republican controlled General Assembly to pass a flurry of laws reducing gubernatorial powers. This same legislative body had not curbed Republican Pat McCrory’s powers previously, nor did they voice any desire to.

If you want to dig deeper, look at Bladen, Richardson and Richmond counties in NC. Lowest % of college educated, lowest income, in a region with some of the best schools and jobs in the US. I think it was also Bladen County where the court found and convicted perpetrators of the largest voter fraud scheme in recent history, by Republicans in 2018. Not so subtle repression of the Black vote. NYT did a 5 series podcast “The Improvement Association.”

To Heather’s point, there is a huge incentive among Republicans to cause Biden’s failure. You can see it in the WSJ every day “inflation fear.”

Expand full comment

As a denizen of this fair state, I can say the lege has become seriously unrepresentative of its constituents. The election in 2010 ushered in the GOP takeover of state governance, coinciding with the census, giving them the opportunity to rig everything strongly in their favor. They've wreaked havoc ever since. We're still struggling to get Medicare expansion while they legislate on every culture war issue their thinktank buddies can muster.

Expand full comment

You all are victims, as are many, of MINjority Republican rule which, I think, goes back to the failure of the Obama admin to fight like hell for the hope advertised in their campaign and allow Rs to take over (the great shellacking) in 2010.

Expand full comment

Cate… you might be interested…

Here is an explanation of the bullsh*t of 2010. From another Substack blog.

https://tcinla757.substack.com/p/just-go-to-hell-rahm?r=l2aa7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=text

Expand full comment

That is absolutely right on. Thank you.

Expand full comment

"yesterday, Ohio Senator Rob Portman, a Republican, told CNN that a provision to pay for the package in part by enforcing tax laws against those ignoring them bothered Republicans enough that negotiators cut it."

Read that line again. Not new taxes, not raising the tax rate, just enforcing existing tax law to catch the tax cheaters. And Republicans were against it. THEY WERE AGAINST making it harder to cheat. And they were willing to scuttle a desperately needed infrastructure bill to keep that from happening. And Portman is talking about that as if it's a good thing? "Look at us, we fought for the right to cheat on your taxes and we won! "

There is no compromise with these wankers. The GOP only 'compromises' if it means Democrats fold to their wishes. And they get away with it because too many people sit out the vote or vote to cut their own throats. I despair of this world.

Expand full comment

But if it’s already a law, why does it need to be part of the negotiations? Leave it out … but enforce it anyways. Why do you need Republican approval to ENFORCE a law? What am I missing?

Expand full comment

The Republicans stripped out funding for the IRS to enhance their enforcement of the tax laws. IRS needs a funding increase to effectively go after the tax cheats (mostly corporations and super wealthy individuals) who use very complex schemes to evade taxes.

Expand full comment

That’s the way royalty acts - as if the world owes them a living and thy dont have to psy for anything.

Expand full comment

The R’s are all about cheating in elections.

Expand full comment

Not enforce ALREADY WRITTEN tax laws???

Expand full comment

I had to read that more than once, too. And so the negotiators dropped it? WTH??? NO! Leave it in there, walk away and fold the whole thing into the larger reconciliation bill and get it done. Stop playing Nice and ram it through. These people have no intention of negotiating with Dems. They do this over and over again and Dems just keep getting up and taking it some more. Enough already!

Expand full comment

enough turning the other cheek already! We’re so screwed if dems don’t get tough

Expand full comment

Lucy and the football! Maybe the Dems dont "read" the comics???

Expand full comment

This jumped out at me as well!!! How can they say they don’t want already existing tax laws enforced?!?!

Expand full comment

Protecting their donor base...large corporations, and big money?

Expand full comment

Because trump might go to jail?

Expand full comment

Tells you who they support, right?

Expand full comment