I express caution in painting the mainstream Democrats with such a broad brush as you did in your original comment.
Right now I am urging Garland to take action while withholding blanket criticisms of the mainstream Democratic Party. This type of rhetoric is harmful.
I express caution in painting the mainstream Democrats with such a broad brush as you did in your original comment.
Right now I am urging Garland to take action while withholding blanket criticisms of the mainstream Democratic Party. This type of rhetoric is harmful.
Once again. I can't and don't speak to such gross generalities. Which election? Which opponents? What are the issues. Who is winning the argument? What is the prevailing political sentiment? What is the media environment? I won't throw down good guys vs bad guys arguments without more specifics.
I express caution in painting the mainstream Democrats with such a broad brush as you did in your original comment.
Right now I am urging Garland to take action while withholding blanket criticisms of the mainstream Democratic Party. This type of rhetoric is harmful.
If simply having a nasty bad faith opponent is enough to make you lose, and no better opponent is forthcoming, what are your options?
Once again. I can't and don't speak to such gross generalities. Which election? Which opponents? What are the issues. Who is winning the argument? What is the prevailing political sentiment? What is the media environment? I won't throw down good guys vs bad guys arguments without more specifics.
We must be informed, discerning voters.
We must. Oh indeed, we must. But we aren't the people we need to convince. And the people we need to convince are neither informed nor discerning.