721 Comments

Dear Grandson, I just sent you the newsletter. This morning I thought I should include a personal note. The reality of the last 3 days seeps through the cracks in our consciousness with each hour. The newsletter clarifies the known facts as well as possible. Today, it frightened me. And that made me think of you, your sisters, your parents and your friends. I thought of how you must be puzzled by such events at the hands of adults.

I believe in Joseph Biden. I believe in his humanness. I believe in the people he is assembling to help govern the country. I believe in the humanity of the vast, vast majority of Americans.

Lots of troubles exist in America, some since conception. Now Covid, Climate change, and the aftermath of djt . But of all the countries on earth, we are the best equipped to solve our problems and to help the rest of this world to fix what we all face.

So keep the faith. Work hard, play hard, and sleep hard. Be both kind and brave. Don’t hate.

Don’t put up with hate. Dream your dreams and put them into action. It’s going to be ok.

Love from GP

Expand full comment

That is awesome, I was just thinking that HCR's letters should be required reading for all high school students.. Facts and no spin..

Expand full comment

I sent a copy of one of her letters to a client who said she was on the fence at the time about having voted for Trump. She totally rejected the letter saying that it was misinformation. So trash that idea! I don’t know who it was that said, we will find information to support our belief.

Expand full comment

Anyone who could have voted for him in '16, and is still on the fence has said it all. I don't even try to reason, explain, or provide enlightening facts. They won't change, and I won't provide oxygen. They're the people who are now blaming the Capitol insurrection on Antifa.

Expand full comment

I just “uh huh” them. Conversationally ghosting someone is the best form of disrespect.

Expand full comment

I can do the uh huh thing, but only to a point. I have a few long-time friends that I'll tolerate, but if they refuse my request to abstain from political discussion, they're off my list. In the past, I could have polite discourse, but the last four years have made civil discussion impossible.

Expand full comment

I only do it with clients. It’s not my job to tell clients what I think. That said, friends, I’ve ghosted them all together. I decided a long time ago to keep toxic people out of my life. So I hear ya.

Expand full comment

I srsly cannot be friends with such ignorant ppl. I have worked 30 years with developmentally disabled ppl and tho often misguided most are teachable. (Some are even very astute and I have been friends with them, off the clock). I could not tolerate hateful, destructive, bigoted cultists.

My daughter told me she met a guy, was contemplating intimacy with him until he revealed he was a MAGAT. A black guy! She dumped him on the spot.

Expand full comment

Confirmation bias, I learned, is the term for ‘will find information to support our belief’

Expand full comment

You're correct. Another way to look at confirmation bias is one's ability to twist whatever one sees, reads or hears into something that supports one's previously-held belief.

Expand full comment

Confirmation bias has become so normalized in the past 1/2 decade that I've more than once found myself wondering if I am a clueless idiot who is completely wrong about the deep differences in the aims of the two major political parties in our country, if it is my T****-supporting siblings who are the clear-sighted ones of our parents' progeny instead of me, if I've missed the boat.

My youthful readings of Frank Boas and Ruth Benedict made me believe in cultural relativism; however, I can never see female genital mutilation, foot-binding, female infanticide, rampaging colonialism, or systemic racism as excusable because of the beliefs and practices of the cultures from which those horrors have arisen.

If I am suffering from confirmation bias, I am not sure I want to be relieved of that fault, now that I think about it.

Expand full comment

There is a big difference between:

1. The closed system of unconscious confirmation bias that reifies destructive hateful ideology, whipping up a group to violence, versus

2. Open minded cultural relativism and open minded listening, after which we apply critical thinking and make judgments based on our own morality, our values of what is wholesome and life affirming for humanity.

Expand full comment

I sent one to my 2 brothers. One ignored it; the other told me not to ever send him any more of that left-wing, socialist propaganda.

Expand full comment

Your beautiful letter broke my heart that it had to even be written to our younger generation. What a loving grandfatherly thing to do today.

Expand full comment

At this point, I'm having trouble with the "Don't hate" part. Hopefully, I'll conquer that. Thank you for your wonderful letter and saying that "of all the countries on earth, we are the best equipped to solve our problems. . . ." We must remember that and turn away from fear and despair. They want us to wring our hands and hide in a corner,

Expand full comment

Thank You!

Expand full comment

I have a great-grandson now, born on Nov. 8, 2016, my own birthday 72 years earlier. It was an occasion of great joy, especially for me. EXCEPT ...

Expand full comment

Great stuff, I know. I remember clearly as if it was yesterday dealing with my elder granddaughter when she was a 3 yr old pest (born when I was in the US.....now 20 and becoming fashion editor on numerous internet publications. Didn't see it passing!

Expand full comment

I’m saving these newsletters for my great-grandsons. I’m also writing lists of the known Trump and Democrat supporters in my parents’ branch of our greater family tree. Unfortunately, the Trump supporter list will be the longest.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing. We have MUCH work to do.

Expand full comment

I love this! thank you...

Expand full comment

You sound like a wonderful grandpa. I must confess that even I felt comforted reading your words. Thank you!

Expand full comment

I was here for the Kennedy assassination, Nixon resignation, Reagan attempted assassination (which only angered me that Brady was collateral), but this attempted coup as a finale to a wannabe dictators horrid rule is the most disturbing political event of my life.

And now it is coming out that those sinister things we suspected of this “regime” are true. It was a real coup attempt, run by naive idiots who could not sustain it but now we are finding how high in the government was involvement. The police are suspect, the military is suspect and elected legislators along with oligarchs behind the scene are known accomplices. Conspiracy theories of a right-wing takeover of the U.S. took a turn toward reality this week.

And the madman in the Oval Office is still there. Ppl involved are getting arrested but being charged with misdemeanor “breaking & entering” or “unlawful trespassing.” We need to see real felony charges of INSURRECTION, SEDITION, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT/’BATTERY & FELONY MURDER where the perps sit behind bars until arraigned and then held without bond.

Expand full comment

"Bill & Susan replied to your comment

All caps are neither required nor appreciated. This isn't FB or Tweeter."

Apparently Bill & Susan decided that arbiters of style are neither required or appreciated and deleted their comment. But, I will still reply that Bold, Italics, and Underlines are sometimes required for emfasis none of which I can do on this forum, SO ALL CAPS ARE REQUIRED, WHETHER APPRECIATED OR NOT.

And yes, I also replace the useless "ph" when I writing an "f" sound as do so many fonetic languages.

Expand full comment

If you had used ALL caps throughout, that is one thing; however, resorting to all caps as our simplest way of creating emfasis (I like your fonetix!) is completely reasonable.

Expand full comment

Yes, that was unfortunate. More power to them for having reconsidered

Expand full comment

"Tweeter"? That's a tiny speaker designed to enhance high-frequency sound reproduction.

Expand full comment

Love it! And "Twitter"....the chatter of bird brains. Natural for the flying variety of course.

Expand full comment

We didn't delete our comment. Substack barfed under the load. Resorting to all caps is the habit of a lazy mind. Not arguing with your points, because as soon as we see that we don't read the post. We simply move on to look for more intelligent commentary.

Expand full comment

Each of us has our style and always considerate of the other. Language and emphasis are personal. Passion can be expressed here just as well as clinical analysis and both are understood, discussed and enjoyed. Tolerance is not a word that I would use in the circumstances as it would suggest a norm over and above my first phrase from which someone was deviating. We are here because we wanted a calm, intelligent forum, far away from the FB agressivity and condemnation , while making a contribution through ideas, opinions and discussion.

Expand full comment

Dang.

Expand full comment

And yet, here you are. I suppose you read where I disagree with your opinion.

Expand full comment

I agreed with Nixon's pardon thinking that we need not be like other countries that have to jail our former leaders. That just makes politics rougher, or so I thought. Trump's presidency has sorely tested that belief but I held onto that belief. The attempted coup on Jan 6th was more than the last straw. An attempt to use force to install a president is short said an attempted coup. A president who tries that needs to be impeached and convicted--even if the conviction happens after he has already left office. The people who broke into the capitol building need to be given more than misdemeanor convictions. Yes, the impeachment may just be symbolic but it is a symbolism we need. Yes an impeachment and some felony convictions will make some people mad but it will also make them think twice before trying something similar.

Expand full comment

American exceptionalism ("we're different; it can't happen here") is a self-delusion. I'm glad you came around at last, but I hope you'll take a good hard look at what took you so long. Because plenty of us have been here waiting for decades.

Expand full comment

I can see why you are stereotyping me that way but, allthough I grew up in Nebraska, I have degrees from schools in both Denmark and Canada. I know from first hand experience the U.S. is not exactly a paradigm for other countries to imitate. Am I also a Danish and Canadian exceptionalist because I don't expect to see a coup attempt in either of those countries during my lifetime? Come to think of it I'm rather surprised that you have been expecting to see one here.

Expand full comment

Yes!

Expand full comment

yes.. we must be in the same graduating class... and I remember my parent's reactions to each of these events as well...and the Bay of Pigs! This has been the most horrifying of all.. perhaps 'tied' with the Kennedy Assassinations and Martin Luther King.. but this is so massive! The scale of this..the complicity...as horrified as I am...and have been for days... I still thinkI am in shock to some degree and as more is learned the more distressing it becomes... and if Heather is not allowed back on Facebook..whoa! That truly concerns me!

Expand full comment

What? Heather not on Facebook?

Expand full comment

May be this has already been answered. Here is Heather's FB post from about 1 PM today:

Hi Folks:

My January 8, 2021 post has been taken down. Usually this happens when someone complains about it. The post then goes to Facebook jail until a moderator reviews it. At that point, until now, anyway, it has always come back up. I expect the same will happen this time, eventually.

I also expect that this will happen frequently for awhile, as far-right activists try to reclaim the public platforms that have now been denied them. Their panic at being kicked off Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and so on illustrates exactly what I've been trying to say about the importance of reclaiming public debate. If they didn't think taking up oxygen was important, they would not be fighting so hard to make sure they dominate public spaces.

Do remember, though, that my posts are always available-- for free-- at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com under the title "Letters from an American." You don't have to subscribe or get them through email if you don't want to; you can just go to the site and read them there. If you DO want to get them through email, you can sign up through the free option. You don't have to worry that I will use advertising or harvest emails (who am I kidding? I don't even know how! 🙂 )

These are frightening times, and we're all tired and on edge-- me, included. It means a lot to have so many people here who care.

So thanks, yet again.

Heather

Expand full comment

Thank you Bob, this is good to know.

Expand full comment

HCR’s Jan 8 post was restored to FB a few hours later.

Expand full comment

BTW, here is something a friend sent me in an e-mail. Some ppl are monitoring FB and turns out it is an insidious influencer in its practices. But it did fail in GA.

https://themarkup.org/citizen-browser/2021/01/05/in-georgia-facebooks-changes-brought-back-a-partisan-news-feed

Moot for me since I am no longer on that platform and will soon be off twitter, having likely been targeted by some right-winger who did not like my anti-tRumper tweet. I refuse to delete the tweet (FB always did it for me) and it is still languishing in appeal 2 days later.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Rob, and good luck with Twitter.

Expand full comment

It’ll happen. The serious crimes will put plenty of people in jail. The judicial system grinds slowly, I know, it’s hard to be patient.

But here’s why I am responding:

You wrote:

“this attempted coup as a finale to a wannabe dictators horrid rule is the most disturbing political event of my life.”

Like you, I was here for JFK‘s assassination and the others you list. My wife and I have been comparing this event to JFK in Dallas. These two events, JFK in Dallas and 1/6/21, are the two most disturbing political events of our lives.

*takes a deep breath*

*now tears want to come*

This is hard to process.

Expand full comment

Here is also a text exchange on HCR 1/7/21, Ted Keyes asking the question and me responding:

What are the historical parallels to other Coup attempts or snatch and grab elections to secure first power, then consolidate it and transition to authoritarianism. It has never happened here, so where do we look for parallels to make sense of Jan 6th, 2021?

Adolf Hitler and his storm troopers, the brown shirts, for one. There are many other examples of course. What makes us different than most of history: this wannabe dictator doesn’t have control of (1) the military and doesn’t have control of (2) national police. Our system, our Constitution, is specifically designed to prevent dictatorship. That’s why the military is not allowed to intervene domestically. That’s why we don’t have a national police force that can lock people up. That’s why Congress (legislative branch) is separate and independent from the judiciary (legal system) is separate and independent from the executive branch, so that the attempted power-grab by the executive branch, which is Trump, can still be contained and prevented by the other branches.

We have a unique system, custom-designed to prevent exactly the types of things that DT is trying to pull off.

Trump has tried every way possible to be a dictator. He has been probably our only real test of the system. His attempts to change the vote to invalidate Biden’s win and keep himself as President, guess what, that’s exactly what Putin does and Stalin did. It happens in countries all over the world, all the time. But here he is unable to pull it off, because people are legally bound to follow the Constitution. Many guard rails.

Controlling the vote, that’s also what that jerk Lukashenko does to stay in power in Belarus. If you control the vote count, as Stalin said, you control your position on top. Putin is Exhibit A.

The historic parallel I know the best is Hitler’s Germany. The US Capitol riot is watered down, unofficial version of what Hitler did to the German parliament in the 1930s, it’s called the Reichstag. He ordered his brown shirts in there, his thugs (they are very similar to this MAGA crowd except they were paid and wore matching uniforms), and they trashed and looted the place and burned it. It’s the house of the people, just like here.

Expand full comment

I recommend the book, How Democracies Die, by Levitsky and Ziblatt. Short and readable, and based on a study of numerous modern democracies around the world that have failed.

The book has a few eye-openers (for the politically naïve, like myself), one of them being how much we must rely upon the powerful to keep their own sandbox clean. The authors have an interesting take on both the Electoral College, and the necessity of "back room power-brokers."

In particular, the back-room deals have an essential role in prejudicially weeding out people like Trump, and others who threaten the system. Trump should have been quietly but firmly disqualified from even being allowed to join the 2016 Republican slate: he should have been forced to form his own new party with no national recognition at all. But -- and this is a typical failure mode, according to L & Z -- the weaker party (the Republicans) got desperate and fell for the shiny thing, thinking they could control this useful idiot. They found that they could not control him, and in the process, lost control of their own party and a large portion of their electorate.

The normal outcome of this blunder would have been a corrupted election -- which almost happened -- that made the useful idiot "president for life," supported by a popular minority of fanatics and an increasingly captive electoral process.

What was remarkable was not that we almost lost our democracy, but that we DIDN'T lose our democracy. We should have. It's like we walked down Muggers' Lane, where 99.9% of everyone who walks down that road gets robbed and killed, and somehow -- somehow -- the US strolled down that road whistling, and got out the other end, a little bruised and short a wallet and watch, but still alive.

I'm sure that a large part of Trump's ire over the 2020 election is that he KNOWS this. He thinks he should still be president, and really, he should be.

I can only speculate as to why this failed. A large part of it, I think, was that the states ran such a clean national election. I suspect Trump was too drunk on his popularity among his cultists to take sufficient measures to corrupt the election, and as a television celebrity, he mistook popularity polls for votes. He thought he was in for an easy win, and when the people rejected him, I think he was completely unprepared.

The January 6 insurrection looks entirely like a desperate Hail Mary fling. All of those post-November shake-ups in the executive branch, particularly in the military, should have been in-place at least a year earlier. Every one of the crackpot schemes cooked up by the lawyers should have been thoroughly vetted and prioritized before the election took place. He should not have relied upon a rag-tag mob of right-wing extremists and civilian cultists: in four years' time, he could have had trained private military forces ready.

The REAL failure in this whole process goes back to 2015, when the Republican Party sold out and let Trump get on stage.

Expand full comment

“The states running a clean election” is also part of that juggernaut analogy. For over 250 years, those elections have been operating basically seamlessly, if you discount voter suppression of non-whites. But even if you take voter suppression into consideration, the mechanics of those elections are clean. It takes work to corrupt something that’s working well, automatically, for a long period of time.

Another consideration: what happens at a national level is truly governed, wants to be governed, by what the majority wants. Biden knows this. Most politicians know this. They are very careful about keeping close tabs on what the majority wants. Now if the majority wants something different than a white male politician personally wishes for, then a conflict happens. Voting them out of office is the eventual, natural consequence.

Bottom line: the majority of America no longer wants the racist (whites first) and sexist (males in charge) system. Hence the desperation move of voting in such a corrupt and flawed individual.

“They found that they could not control him, and in the process, lost control of their own party and a large portion of their electorate.” Their time has come and gone. They are on the way out. This is part of their disintegration process. The Republican Party as we know it will never be the same. Exactly what they will look like is anybody’s guess, but at a minimum they are splintering into (1) racists that still adhere to the U.S. democratic system (Kinzinger, Cheney, Republican judges, ...) and (2) racists with some integrity and ideology, old Republican Party (Lincoln Project, George Will,...) and (3) flagrant racist extremists who just want to keep it white, no matter what it takes (everyone in the Trump camp, insurrectionists).

Expand full comment

Hi Joseph. I agree with your assessment, all of it, of what happened re: the Republican Party and Trump’s drunk-on-adulation hangover and his last ditch, too-late efforts to stay president. We saw some of that “back room power brokers” activity when Clyburn and Obama jumped in to endorse Biden. As you noted, nothing similar to that on the Republican side in 2016.

I hear you about being politically naive. If it weren’t for the time spent here on HCR’s site, I’d still be that person. DJT forced me to understand politics.

What I don’t see mentioned in your excellent analysis is the foundation of our society, the basis of “politics.” Based on what I’ve learned just paying close attention these last few years here, and my knowledge of my own father and the truck drivers in my life, I am now convinced that people fall into 2 camps: either (1) they want to maintain some or all of the old society, no changes allowed, or (2) they are embracing the change to a new society of diversity. The populace which the Republican Party represents, the racist and sexist et al segment of society, is desperate to maintain control of society so that it reflects their vision. They will lie cheat and steal, and do whatever it takes, to keep the whites-first males-first society dominant. So they fight tooth and nail against every non-white non-straight person, especially if it’s a she, who gets into a position of authority, and they fight every person (Biden, Pelosi, ...) and policy which supports a power-sharing diverse populace.

That is the crux of American politics. It looks polarized because it is.

Trump did not factor in the strength of the democratic element. He and his cohorts and admirers call it “the deep state.” When Kelly and other White House officials and Pentagon chiefs “managed” Trump, for example by preventing him from having easy access to various choices like nuclear options, they were providing guard rails. When Jim Mattis and other military chiefs loudly chastised the secretary of defense and others for being present during that Bible raising photo op, and the military action which proceeded it, again the structure of this democracy was making itself felt.

The American democracy is the oldest democracy in the world. Tradition can be a powerful thing. Institutional inertia, is what I call it. When an ocean liner has to change direction, it’s a time-consuming and laborious process. The ocean liner wants to keep going in the same direction, it doesn’t turn easily or readily.

Instead of the Muggers Ln. analogy, may I offer the picture of a pirate vessel which got in front of the ocean liner and was rammed, run over.

The German democracy under Hitler was brand new, you could argue that Russia since the czars still is not a democracy, although it may have been one briefly under Gorbachev, so having a circa 250-year-old democracy provides some small measure of momentum, of inertia. All those laws and rules and traditions have a deep impact because of their longevity, if nothing else. They become part of our DNA. The entire military elite of our country was trained to stay the hell out of domestic politics. All of that training in those elite military schools, impressing itself on young minds, has an effect.

Am I surprised that our democracy survived Trump? No. Am I nervous that it got close to being severely damaged? Hell yes.

Unless we discuss what keeps the democracy intact with a 2-bit, 2nd-class criminal in the Oval Office, part of the story is missing. Also we have to keep in mind that it is the less educated amongst us who are strenuously advocating for a whites-first society. The people who are ignorantly trying to keep all whites and men in charge (and non-whites and women only if they support the old whites-first males-first society), and keep our society operating as racist and sexist, are now probably in the minority but nevertheless savagely resisting change and savagely insisting on keeping whites, men and straights in charge. Probably most of their behavior is subconscious. Most of them are in denial that they are racist and sexist, insults and dirty words to them. Intelligent people examine. Ignorant people just accept cultural conditioning, they don’t want to examine.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hello SC. I did a double-take when I saw your post in my email. It took several minutes to register that you are posting way back on a day just after 1/6/21.

O! how much more we still had to learn about the extent and depth of this coup conspiracy.

I understand your fear and concern. So many people feel like you do. The Christian Taliban is certainly making a play for control of society, and so are the other members of the unholy alliance of MAGA-ts containing white supremacists, male supremacists, antisemites and gay persecutors / deniers that has become the Republican Party.

Maybe I’m just a marshmallow fluff idealist. But I see the trend of society, which has moved inexorably towards more and more freedom for and acceptance of voices of diversity. The overall trend of global society is towards inclusion of all people, towards diversity. Slavery is dying. Women’s rights are improving (Roe threat and Afghanistan regression notwithstanding). Gay pride is on the rise. Hollywood gets battered with criticism when it disappoints. I see the Trump administration, and the society which supports it, like a cornered rat just before it gets caught by animal control. They are getting a last hurrah, a last chance to be seen, before they are assimilated by the Borg.

It’s the long view. Gay pride and rainbow flags and Obergefell did not exist when I was born, and certainly not in Africa and Asia. Loving was still waiting to happen. LBJ’s Voting Rights Act had yet to doom segregation and lynching.

America stinks. Discrimination and persecution is rampant. But notice that it now makes headlines every day. The trend is in the right direction.

Does it mean that we are not under threat? No, on the contrary, the threat is very real. However, it now makes headlines, where in the past it was swept under the rug.

I think racism is dying. I think sexism is dying. I think gender persecution is on the wane. But your concern, and the concern of so many of us, is so well warranted and so absolutely essential.

Keep being scared. That’s what ends up holding the degenerates to account. It is apathy and complacency that is the true enemy of freedom and progress. Think Nazi Germany, where the entire society just ended up going with the racist program. At least the US is not making that mistake. The concern and alarm is huge. Thank goodness for that.

Expand full comment

Thank you Roland for filling in the gaps of history about coups. I have not studied the details, just skimmed over events of my life that I have seen first-hand or in movies of the era in which I was born (1944 – the day after FDR won his 4th term).

I made an allusion to that on the HCR Jan 6 letter:

“However, (the coup attempt) was anti-climactic and not surprising at all, considering what we have been enduring for the past 4 years with this stochastic terrorist in the White House fomenting his cult base to do just this kind of outrageous stuff with the silent complicity of the Repugnant Party. To a lesser degree it had already been done in Michigan with death threats to their governor and taking over the statehouse. Add to that the past 4 years of an autocrat basking in the power of the presidency directing his Red Hat MAGATS from the podium to do just such despicable violence under the guise of his protection. I mentioned to my sister that we grew up with black & white film of Hitler ranting to the masses just like that and we never knew what he was saying because it was in German, but now we know. And now the attack on the Reichstag suggests such comparison was not hyperbole.”

Expand full comment

No, not at all, no hyperbole. On Greg Olear, a poster calls Tя☭mp "Shitler." Tя☭mp actually studied Hitler's tactics, he was given a 1941 book of Hitler's analysis of his speeches and methods and studied it in the 1980s, contact me if you want the source reference for that.

Because people in this country are allergic to Hitler and Nazi Germany, just uttering the words freaks out most people, there's a lot of valuable history not being brought to bear on this Administration. My parents were both born in Germany and grew up in that era, plus our family lived in Frankfurt when I was in my teens. So I know exactly what Hitler is saying in those speeches, the speechs that DT has studied.

We are lucky we have the guardrails that the Constitution and the U.S. system provide, they are saving us right now. In most countries and most eras of history, what happened this week could have turned into a coup or a putsch or regime change if any planning had gone into it. Really it was just Tя☭mp directing a mob at the Capitol, I don't think that constitutes a real challenge to the U.S. govt., which is incredibly strong and resilient, no real threat of regime change. But not everyone I know agrees with me, that's just my faith in the system.

Expand full comment

This is a very good explanation. Thanks!

Expand full comment

I lived and worked in the Golden Triangle of lower SE Texas during the Bay of Pigs/USSR nuclear threat. This area was full of petroleum and chemical plants. My husband worked at DuPont Chemical. Our area and Houston’s were determined to be key areas for attacks and everyone was told to have emergency supplies in the trunks of cars and an evacuation plan. My husband told me he would have to stay at the plant and I was to go north to a relative’s home if the alarm of pending attack was sounded. The thought of those days is now making my heart beat faster. I imagine that fear was much like what some of our congresspersons and staff felt Wednesday. Though concerned when JFK was killed and 9/11 occurred, I didn’t feel afraid for myself and my husband as I did when I thought the upper Texas coast might be bombed; back then I was too close to the reality.

Expand full comment

Did you buy a ticket? And yes, Bill and Susan have a point. We can read even small letters.

Expand full comment

I agree Rob.

Expand full comment

The comment I saw on NBC I think was a woman interviewed who said something like “going to see President Trump speak is like going to church”. Now he’s some kind of “savior”.

Expand full comment

I'm posting this with the following statement: I hate Trump with the energy of 10 billion suns. I want to see him and his three spalpeen in prison forever.

It's also clear that impeachment will not do that, no matter what kind of a satisfying post-coital high it gives for 10-15 minutes. What's going to put him away is the cases from SDNY, the NY State AG and the Manhattan DA. He'll actually be charged, actually be found guilty, and actually be punished. In the meantime, perhaps the rest of us ought to keep our eye on the ball - which I no longer think is impeachment.

This was posted at TPM tonight. It's worthy of serious thought. As much as I wanted to dismiss it out of hand when I first read it, it's so truthful I couldn't.

Some thoughts worth considering from John Judis, who's been involved in politics long enough to "have a clue." It's a question to consider: fix the blame or fix the problem?

DON'T THROW HIM IN THE BRIAR PATCH

By: John Judis

“Of all things, don’t throw me in the briar patch,” Brer Rabbit implores Brer Wolf, but Brer Wolf, wanting to do away with his nemesis, tosses him in the briar patch, from which Brer Rabbit, who was born and bred in the briar patch, emerges, laughing at the fox. The fox is Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats; Trump is the rabbit; and the briar patch is impeachment.

If Democrats vote this week to impeach Trump, the Senate won’t take up the question of conviction until after the inauguration. The Georgia election may not be certified until January 22, so at that point, the new majority leader Chuck Schumer can take up the question. A trial could take weeks, and would consume the news and the attention of Congress. The Democrats may not get the two-thirds vote it needs in the Senate to convict him. And in any case, Trump will be gone. What’s the point? To make it impossible for Trump, then 78, to run for office again? Nothing would benefit the Democrats more than another Trump bid.

Politics is not a simple matter of right and wrong. It is a matter of priorities. Yes, Trump did wrong, he is a bad guy. But the country is in the grips of a pandemic – over 4000 people died on Thursday – and in December, the country lost 140,000 more jobs. The Democrats have to focus on that not on Trump. The country has spent four years focusing on Trump. It’s what he loves. It’s his briar patch. Enough is enough, as Lindsey Graham put it.

There is a simple political lesson here. By giving all their attention to halting the pandemic and making sure the economy bounces back, Biden and the Democrats will be doing what the nation needs and wants. It is also what the Democrats need to do if they want to retain control of the Congress in 2022. If they allow the budget fight to drag on, and the pandemic and recession to drag on, they could lose control of the Congress in 2022 – recall how narrow the margins are. In that case, whatever good they will be able to do can easily be undone by Republican majorities in the House or Senate. And Democrats might lose the White House in 2024. Think again of Obama’s first year and how by not paying sufficient attention to the politics, the Democrats lost the House in 2010.

Sure, people in Washington and Democratic activists around the country want to punish Trump. In that case, censure him. But don’t allow him to continue to dominate the nation’s political agenda for the rest of the month. Don’t throw him in his briar patch of attention. Believe me, people outside the Beltway who make up the majorities Democrats need to govern are far more worried about the pandemic and recession than they are about impeaching Trump. And the Democrats can’t do an adequate job of both.

Expand full comment

I'm not even interested in a Senate trial. Skip it for all I care. It'll take too long, take up too much oxygen, and keep the pus oozing sore of trump's memory open just that much longer. But if he isn't removed by invoking the 25th, which is fitting but seems like a long shot, he deserves impeachment by the House. It can be done relatively quickly while he's still in office. That will at least make clear to history and the world that he was an unacceptable president, as well as being a good kick in his ass as he goes out the door.

Expand full comment

In the 1970s Ford pardoned Nixon, which seemed at the time a way to heal the country. But what that really did was signal that political wrong doers would not be punished. So I agree that the House needs to impeach Trump. We need to tell our political leaders there will be consequences for their betrayal of their oaths of office. An impeachment vote by the House is far from all that Trump deserves, but if it is as much as we can lay on him now, it should happen.

Expand full comment

A second impeachment would be a nice asterisk on his legacy, unless, by some miracle, a deal to resign can be put together over the weekend. Threaten to take away some of those generous perks he does not deserve. Colin Powell should be in charge of that.

Expand full comment

Please, at least take away his blank check for all the financial and security benefits that he is ‘entitled’ to! Please!

Expand full comment

This is crazy. What is the point of having Impeachment in the Constitution if it is not used? An attempted coup and a phonecall to overturn a legal and fair election. If these are not grounds for impeachment and removal, then what is? Republicans got Clinton for a lie and sex. Honestly this makes me feel hopeless about our country and our party.

Expand full comment

Dang right.

Expand full comment

Powell’s got a plan to fire him and he’s a general. Newsweek website reported:

"Those who are suggesting impeachment or the 25th Amendment, that's time-consuming," Powell told NBC's Today on Friday. "I wish he would just do what Nixon did, and that's step down."

Powell, who led the State Department under President George W. Bush, added that "somebody ought to go up there and tell him it's over. The plane's waiting for you, you're out. That way he would not only step down, he would in addition sort of cut the guts out from underneath this group of people who he has working for him."

Take Lindsay and Hopey and other former loyalists and get it done. Then fly that plane straight to Siberia. It’s nice to think about.

Expand full comment

WHAT? Did I read this correctly? Powell can (or is going to) fire him!?

Expand full comment

He is drawing on what happened to Nixon in 1974. While the House Judiciary Committee was debating whether to bring a bill of impeachment to the whole House, senior Republicans from Congress went to Nixon and said it's over, there are the votes to impeach you. So Nixon resigned. Powell can't fire anybody, and so far I don't see a lot of senior Republicans banding together around a resign now trip to the White House.

Expand full comment

Colin Powell said we should forget impeachment

Expand full comment

He also said Iraq had WMDs.

Expand full comment

Yes, precisely when he lost me

Expand full comment

He’s not my favorite guy either...

Expand full comment

While TC makes some good points, imho, I agree with you Syd. We have to make the statement that he was an entirely unacceptable president. Even if he isn't convicted in the Senate, it would show that he is not above the law and have other benefits including giving the Pentagon pause before taking orders from a president in the process of being impeached. In the meantime, I am sure the SDNY is working overtime on proof of his heinous deeds, enough to put him and his family, businesses etc. in very deep trouble.

The last thing I want is ongoing media attention on this poor excuse for a human being after Biden is inaugurated. I should have compassion for someone who is mentally ill and abused as a child, but there are those who are unforgiveable for the damage they do.

Expand full comment

Yes yes to Syd, and I do understand you TC. But can someone please explain why the option for the 25th is off the table? The president incited a riot and basically encouraged them to harm or kill the Vice President! Throw him out ASAP! And yes, pivot to the pandemic, but the sting of the word Impeachment is a good send off for that disgusting sub-human.

And I wish something would be done about Ted Cruz... I cannot stand to write his name. While I am thrilled that Hawley shot himself in the foot, why aren’t people piling up on him as well. And Lindsey Graham and his ‘enough is enough’ made me laugh. He doesn’t get a pass. Too little too late. He bears a lot of responsibility for what has happened over the last 4 years. My head hurts, I am afraid and so sad. But this is my safe place and I imagine that I will be spending a lot of time here today with all of you.

Thank you so much Heather. I truly don’t know what I would do without you here! Stay safe.

Expand full comment

Cynthia, from various accounts about the 25th, it seems the VP must be involved, maybe even initiate the process. And he won’t.

Expand full comment

I guess I knew that, but with !? What could possibly be Pence’s reason? My God! He could have been killed!?!

Expand full comment

It always comes down to greed and power, the scourge of the human race. Power corrupts...

Expand full comment

Back to his Subservient self?

Expand full comment

My theory is the reason he won't take calls from Nancy Pelosi is that he is such a deeply misogynistic thinker that he would feel that responding to her request that he move on invoking the 25th would be taking orders from a woman. His facial expressions while debating Kamala Harris indicated that he has trouble even listening to a woman, let alone take orders from one. I don't imagine he actually listens to "Mother" - should she ever be allowed to speak, he has put her on such a high pedestal, there's no way he'd be able to hear her down at his level.

Expand full comment

Is it possible he is part of DJT's theatre and they plan to pardon him? Sorry, these crimes are too vast now.

Expand full comment

Given that Trump set the mob to kill Pence, that Pence's office waited on the phone half an hour before not taking the call, and the Mnuchin said the 25th would take too long - my interpretation is that Pence's office called around to the Cabinet offices and found there was not a majority to go through with the 25th. "take too long" could mean "take too long to convince enough cabinet members to do it", since the physical process could be done within an hour.

Expand full comment

Now that's a plausible explanation! Good thinking.

Expand full comment

Depends on how angry and afraid he is. He is looking at the end of his political career too.

Expand full comment

Then he is complicit in the insurrection against our country and we need to bypass him. Pelosi should be in power now.

Expand full comment

Cynthia-I agree something must be done about Ted Cruz! He also contributed to the fueling these insurrectionist actions. He continues with his divisive language (and should also be “un tweeted”). I know Hawley has received criticism in his home state and is tweeting about his lost book deal. But I don’t know if Ted Cruz has received any condemnation from his constituents and backers.

Expand full comment

Apparently the Houston Chronicle called for his resignation!

Expand full comment

When is Cruz up for reelection?

Expand full comment

That’s so excruciating long, right?!

Expand full comment

the 25th Amendment calls for a decision by the VP AND a majority of the Cabinet or some other body designated by a law passed by Congress...Congress has never passed such a law (although the House is now working on one which would apply hence forth), so that means the VP and majority of Cabinet, at least two cabinet members have resigned, and it is not at all clear that acting Cabinet members could legitimately make such a decision, and they are probably not interested in making it (since as acting cabinet they are far more beholden to Trump than duly appointed members). This is why the 25th is off the table for the moment.

Expand full comment

You are so right about cruz. He snuck in like the rat he is and changed Texas politics from ridiculous to obscene.

Expand full comment

I am right here with you, no words for how disgusting Cruz is. I don’t understand how he is still in office by the voters of TX. Same with Graham he is just as complicit and T’s golf partner.

It all makes me so sad for our country. We have many friends in other countries and they are completely aghast at what is happening here.

Trump needs no media at all, that’s all he wants. The only media he should receive is when he is cinvicted of his crimes and sent to prison.

Expand full comment

Yes... it’s all so sad...

Expand full comment

And thinking a narcissist like trump is done is very naive. I’m very worried about the next couple of weeks and the potential for a massive violent insurrection- is the huge Russian hack of our vital organizations a coincidence or part of this?

Expand full comment

I think we are only seeing the head of a very long snake.

Expand full comment

We cannot play by our old rules. We have never been here. We need to oust this terrorist dictator and his comrades immediately. Why is this so difficult?

Expand full comment

Agreed, Syd! The statements saying that pressure to remove the president from office will further divide the country just indicates support for the abuser. The victim of this abuser is our American Democratic Republic. We must stand up to this bully once and for all!

Expand full comment

I agree, Syd. Just being impeached (quickly) a second time works for me.

Expand full comment

I agree. They can skip the Senate trial, or do it as quickly as the last one - after all, nearly everyone in the Senate was witness to the insurrection. Put those Republicans on record for or against the insurrection.

Expand full comment

I believe the VP knows that invoking the 25th would enrage Trump's base and completely split them from what remains of the Republican Party. Can the Republicans ever win another election without the right-wing fringe? It appears that Pence and McConnell think they need the fringe.

Expand full comment

I agree. And if we are all to be really honest; the 25th isnt the perfect device. There is no proper device for firing Trump. I wonder if it would be better to move forward in a positive way now and tackle Trump and the insurrection after we get a handle on COVID. Republicans usually are in lock step but, this split is very large. If this party were to split into two I am not sure they would be able to get another president into office for a while. Especially if there is voter reforms and jerrymandering is curbed.

Expand full comment

Doing nothing? That is how this coup d'etat would succeed.

Expand full comment

I hear you but, I wonder how much bandwidth is available right now. We don't know what the inside of the government looks like now. We dont know how much work there is to do to make the most progress while Democrats have the senate. I dont want to waste a moment on anything that wont push the ball forward for all of us. I would also like to see Democrats hold the Senate for as long as possible.

Expand full comment

But we have no process for where we are. The 25th and Impeachment do not address an overthrow of a government by a party of seditionists led by the POTUS. No one should have that kind of power. They need to be arrested and removed from our government. We need a show of force because that is all they respect is strength. Then we need to week out all the other seditionists and their media that keeps them connected. This is anti-American activity. And they were bent on murder on Weds. They should be handled deftly and swiftly and we have already taken way too long. And the world is watching us as the seditionists gloat and plan for more. We must be aggressive, I am sorry. That is not my normal stance, but these are not normal people and behaviors. We know who the head of this snake is. And he needs to be removed.

Expand full comment

Right now I believe that there is an unbelievable amount of anxiety, confusion and a billion dollars in legal fees building in the hallowed halls 😞😞😞... I’m holding my breath, but I am also exhausted and not sure I can process any more tonight... sweet dreams my friends, we’ve got a lot of work to do. We need to stay on top of it all, thank God we have Heather... and we are truly becoming a ‘think tank’ with a wise and learned leader.

We can help.

Expand full comment

exactly,.we cannot do nothing to.him

Expand full comment

IMHO McConnell et. al. Are like the Conservatives in the Weimar Republic who thought they could control Hitler. The tail ended up destroying the dog. I think the Republicans are toast. If they don't cut loose from the fringe.

Expand full comment

Also, Pence is afraid of more death threats, that would follow him back to Indiana.

Expand full comment

Interesting thought that is probably very valid now that I think about it. Hmmm.

Expand full comment

I think they will follow him wherever he goes.

Expand full comment

Yes, but Pence is such a lightweight... I detest McConnell but he’s dumb like a fox. He’s a political mastermind and is so cleverly manipulating every angle. ‘Oh! How many of you are angry right now, scared, and don’t know where to go or who,’ said the wolf... oh! You don’t know who to believe? ‘All the better to eat you with!’

Expand full comment

That would mean that Pence would have to show courage and that is impossible.

Expand full comment

Yes but the Senate will not even meet in time for any meaningful action. But after the 20th the Trial could impeach and reach back to January 7 to ensure he does not complete his Term of Office.

Expand full comment

And, I believe impeachment alone (without conviction) would allow him to be tried for federal crimes, and ban him from running for any government position.

Expand full comment

Yes and we absolutely have to send a message that this is not ok. Everyone is watching.

Expand full comment

I’ve put that question out there if anyone knows. It may be that he has to be convicted in order for the ban on holding a government position. As Heather has pointed out, less concerned about that. IMO, due process of law and making sure there is legal accountability and punishment is of primary importance. Otherwise, what is the point of law and order if it is not implemented for the most egregious of crimes.

Expand full comment

But will his ‘power to pardon’ be taken away without the Senate’s vote?

Expand full comment

Impeachment won’t prevent him from holding another federal office. That requires a separate majority vote in the Senate AFTER the Senate votes to convict by a 2/3 majority.

Expand full comment

Exactly. And conviction would take away his lifelong 200k pension, the 1mil per year travel / security stipend, and his ability to ever run for any kind of office ever again.

Expand full comment

He can be convicted by the incoming Senate after January 20, per HCR.

Expand full comment

Ooh lala. Let's do that!

Expand full comment

He has already been impeached once. Can someone explain how Impeaching a 2nd time stops him from running again?

Expand full comment

Impeaching by itself does not do that. If, and only if, the Senate then voted to convict and further voted to prevent future office holding, would it happen.

Expand full comment

He’s not going to run ... he’ll probably be locked away, somewhere. Perhaps in a straight jacket

Expand full comment

🤞🙏🏼

Expand full comment

I posted a message to correct my earlier response to you, but I mistakenly replied to myself. You are correct; I was wrong. Sorry.

Expand full comment

Yes, the Senate would have to convict. No, they don't have to have a further vote to disqualify him from office. It is a consequence of being impeached and convicted. Article 1, Sec.3.

Expand full comment

He has already been impeached once. Does it mean nothing because he was not convicted?

Expand full comment

My previous comment is wrong. I did some further research, and disqualification from future office is allowed by the Constitution as a consequence of impeachment, but is not automatic. It does require a separate vote after Senate trial and conviction. My apologies for the error.

Black and Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook, New Edition (2018)

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/3_1986SenatesImpeachmentRules.pdf

Expand full comment

just you-off the money...he'll starve to death. figuratively.

Expand full comment

Can we verify this? That makes it worth it, IMHO

Expand full comment

What you are saying is, the wife should make peace with the husband who just assaulted her, for the good of the family. She should not press charges, she should bandage her face and go back to making breakfast.

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

Not quite. A wife can pick up and leave (yes, I know, leaving a lot behind, but saving her life and her self-respect). But the U.S. cannot pick up and leave. In a real sense, we are stuck with him, and with his brand of politics.

We voted him out on Nov 3rd. I think the best we can do is help the Biden-Harris administration do well.

I think I want to look at the infrastructure portions of Biden's campaign web site, and figure out what Pete Buttigieg is thinking, and work on making that part of our national agenda better, and better, and better. Roads, bridges, tunnels, broadband, renewable energy, better batteries.

BTW, I like the "Real Engineering" channel on YouTube, which is providing background information on, say, electric power generations and transmission:

Renewable batteries:

https://youtu.be/-PL32ea0MqM

Wind turbines:

https://youtu.be/wr7QZ364jPY

Europe's electric grid:

https://youtu.be/gacGuWjqKco

Expand full comment

The purpose is to make it impossible for him to run for office anywhere in the USA ever again. He is already ginning up his fascist minions for a 2024 bid. That has to be stopped by legal means. Of course, if his arse is in jail it would be moot but we know plenty of mobsters whose business has continued unabated while they are in prison.

Expand full comment

I can agree with the reasoning here, but if we “stand for nothing, we’ll fall for anything” as the song goes. And another commenter on the FB page made a great point and I won’t remember the specifics here.. According to her, impeachment would strip him of the goodies and benefits he gets on his way out. They include pension for life and secret service detail (?), and more. He MUST be held accountable for not only his state crimes, but his federal crimes as well. This is huge. An attempted coup on our government that he incited, not to mention an hour-long phone call in which he attempted to shake down a Georgia election official to “find him more votes.” If we don’t hold him accountable, then nothing matters and we have set a disastrous precedent.

Expand full comment

He doesn’t need secret service, he can just hire a few of his “low class” (his words) followers. I’m sure they will need jobs after this.

Expand full comment

His low class comment this week might be my favorite so far. Had he not looked at them in the past four years? Did he think they were Norse looking gods with flowing bountiful hair and milky skin? I can’t unstupid 45 or his followers.

Expand full comment

I can just envision the horned, tattooed man in fur driving DJT and Mel around in their Mercedes.

Expand full comment

You raise critical points here, and if the intimations raised in Dr. Richardson's letter of this day are further supported, the ultimate answer will require a very resolute effort by the new AG to investigate, charge, and hopefully convict a wide range of actors who probably include top officials in the DoD, the White House, and even members of Congress. Compared with what may have taken place this week, impeachment is pretty lightweight.

Oh, and thanks for teaching me "spalpeen."

Expand full comment

Spalpeen is one of Charlie Pierce's Irish-isms.

Expand full comment

I get what you're saying, TC, that Trump FEEDS on the attention, and his supporters too. BUT, Trump must be held accountable for his actions, period. Otherwise, we send the message that Rule of Law doesn't matter. Trump has thumbed his nose at ROL for 4 years, bending and breaking it whenever he felt like it. I don't really care what they do - as long as they do SOMETHING. Can't they bring him up on federal charges for sedition and insurrection? Or is he immune?

Expand full comment

Folks. This is a coup on our government. This is SEDITION. Arrest all players.

Expand full comment

You make a great point. The ‘attention factor’. All of these insurrectionists should be banned from the platforms where they cultivated this coup.

Expand full comment

I don't care all that much if he's been impeached but this disgraceful attempt to overthrow a free, fair, and legal election CANNOT be swept under the rug. There is at least circumstantial evidence of involvement in a coup attempt by highly placed government officials and possibly members of the same legislative bodies that were the target of the attack. A full investigation and pursuit of information from the looters on up is demanded by history.

Expand full comment

All good points ... impeachment would negate post presidential provision of support and security for life ... it would be worth doing for that alone, unless there are other ways to deny him/her that ongoing support ... what a hustle!!

Expand full comment

I believe there remains a strong possibility Trump will resign in the remaining time before Biden’s inauguration. Trump fears of prison remain strong. His actions this week and in the weeks since the election in support of insurrection are well documented and I am certain he has been advised could support serious federal charges against him. While he has claimed an absolute right to pardon himself, I am also certain he has been advised by competent constitutional lawyers that the grounds for that view are uncertain. The safest path for him remains a resignation and a last minute pardon for all crimes by a President Pence. Do not discount this as a likely possibility.

Expand full comment

I don’t see him as being a “quitter/loser.”

Expand full comment

Nope, he is way too full of himself and wanting to impress his buddy at the Kremlin.

Expand full comment

He can be pardoned only for federal crimes. The Southern District of New York is waiting for him.

Expand full comment

All the sources are saying he will not. According to Twitter, he already regrets posting the video.

Expand full comment

Pence’s hands may be tied as the revelations continue to pour out.

Expand full comment

After you have read about the attempted coup, why do you think that getting him for tax fraud will soothe the beast? I do not care an iota about Trump. I do hope he goes to jail. I care about this nation and want the people to feel safe and secure. Have we become so numb to violence that we are not disgusted and will not demand justice? Impeachment is too complicated for that. Censure could have been done quickly but wasn’t. He does need to be publicly held accountable. It might be too late. There is football on today and life goes on as usual.

Expand full comment

And we need to define domestic terrorism and arrest those who plot it.

Expand full comment

And we need new rules when the so-called leader of our nation is the head of the insurrection and coup. This is not rocket science in what we Must do. Immediately.

But like all the crimes DJT has committed right in our faces, there never appears to be justice. I could scream that after five years this train wreck is still is ultra-slow motion. I have no words of which to scream, even.

We have no rules in place in our Constitution for massive domestic terrorism and insurrection on behalf of a certain population and people within our own government. So, use the rules if I had led this insurrection. You would arrest me immediately. Nothing less needs to be done.

And I agree, he is already an impeached president-- fears of his running again should be put aside. He will either be in or Moscow or behind bars. He won't like the weather and golfing in latter two latter options.

Expand full comment

Thank you TC. I feel better already, seriously.

Expand full comment

Upon further reflection though, I change my mind, let's impeach the SOB. Watching the Republicans put party over country for 4 years has been gut wrenching, the Democrats MIGHT be able to impeach and govern at the same time, we have to try.

Expand full comment

Lynn, see Syd's comment above.

Expand full comment

I like syd's comment about wooden stake through heart too. Ouch.

Expand full comment

I think impeachment is necessary because it disqualifies him from holding office for the rest of his life.

Expand full comment

Also impeachment takes away his retirement perks. Why should we pay him any more than we have already?

Expand full comment

I still prefer immediate arrest for attempting to overthrow our election and our government.

Expand full comment

I also think that the attempt to impeach him must be made, if only to put on the record those who will oppose and/or attempt to delay it.

Expand full comment

Okay, TC. I applaud your critical thinking about what would be the best solution going forward. Throwing the book at 45 would probably elevate him to martyr/victim status anyway.

Expand full comment

I agree. When I was 4 or 5 I threw tantrums complete with kicking & yelling. My (savvy) mom put me in my room & closed the door. Without an audience what fun was throwing a fit? Trump desperately needs an audience. Enough! He’s no longer our focus. The pandemic is.

Expand full comment

I agree with all of this. I've heard very little about the censure process. If he is censured, would it prevent him from holding office in the future, and what would the vote have to be?

I think Biden, while condemning Trump, has shied away from weighing in on impeachment. He knows full well that his plate will be overflowing (and that was before the insurrection), and has to concentrate his cabinet's energies on repair, not revenge.

Expand full comment

Clarence Thomas’s WIFE tweeted support for Trump?!! A Supreme Court justice supports the incitor of lawless events in the Capitol?! He needs to go. I hope the SecDef is charged since he denied assistance to Muriel Bowser, the mayor. Talk about blood on their hands! Oh, and trump didn’t want his rioters to look “low class.” Are you freaking kidding me?

Expand full comment

Marcy, it's like the biggest circus/shitshow that tRump could possibly create. And the wife of a supreme court justice, really? And Cruz calling for Biden to do more to bring the country together, really? SMH!

Expand full comment

Cruz, Hawley and the other 11 senators and the 140 representatives need to be held accountable. They pushed the lies.

Expand full comment

The word ‘deplorables’ has too many syllables for him to understand.

Expand full comment

Clarence Thomas should resign from his seat.

Expand full comment

Much more than a tweet. Ginni Thomas paid for buses to the rally.

https://twitter.com/quickwitter/status/1347605350673879040?s=21

Expand full comment

"Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), who led the Senate effort to challenge Biden’s election, today tweeted that Biden was not working hard enough to 'bring us together or promote healing' and that 'vicious partisan rhetoric only tears our country apart.'”

Hutzpah!

Cruz is neck and neck with McConnell in the competition for the most hypocritical Republican.

Expand full comment

I'm confident that if Sen. Cruz wanted to fully explain his objection, he'd have to say something like, "Investigating me and my cabal for organizing a failed coup would only tear me, my co-conspirators, and my thoroughly-duped constituents apart, and I'd hate to see my embarrassment revealed in a court of law."

Expand full comment

Cruz's gobsmacking, transparent love of grift and mendacity has been part of his MO since Day One--remember he was a "fiscal conservative" who shut down the government in the Obama years when the entire country was reeling from the worst recession since the 1930s and he didn't want the non-elite to be able to eat, keep their homes, or survive after losing their jobs. But he was all about raising the deficit to astronomical levels to help out the poor 1% who benefited the most from Cheeto's and Murderous Mitch's tax "cuts" (people like me now pay a lot more in taxes because of that "reform" by the way). His self-serving grossness is patent. But Texans have very short memories.

Expand full comment

Recall what Cruz said on the Jimmy Kimmel show during the Presidential Primary race. Cruz: "If I were in my car and getting ready to reverse and saw Donald in the backup camera, I'm not confident which pedal I'd push." They are all terribly corrupt and will say whatever is needed in whatever context.

Expand full comment

And why isn’t he walking the same plank as Hawley?!

Expand full comment

The photo of Hawley giving the insurgents a power fist...pretty much did him in. And rightly so!

Expand full comment

Why aren't all of them?

Expand full comment

I'm rereading Tim Synder's "On Tyranny" book - Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Here are the twenty. Very helpful and valuable to read in the times we are currently experience.

1. Do not obey in advance

2. Defend institutions

3. Beware of the one-party state

4. Take responsibility for the face of the world

5. Remember professional ethics

6. Be wary of paramilitaries

7. Be reflective if you must be armed

8. Stand out

9. Be kind to our language

10. Believe in truth

11. Investigate

12. Make eye contact and email talk

13. Practice corporeal politics

14. Establish a private life

15. Contribute to good causes

16. Learn from peers in other countries

17. Listen for dangerous words

18. Be calm when the unthinkable arrives

19. Be a patriot

20. Be as courageous as you can

Expand full comment

This reminds me of Cathy’s introduction to the Coup Meter.

https://isthisacoup.com/

Snyder’s list also reminds that a coup is a process around an event, and these are measures that we each can practice to help neutralize the growth of a coup process.

Expand full comment

It says we are in the midst of an coup attempt right now. What worries me is the coalition of a lot of these white nationalist type groups.

Expand full comment

Those people were a disorganized mob, with no discipline or organization, populated with wannabe militants. If the capital police had been better prepared and had proper armed backup this would have been stopped in its track’s and the seat of our democracy would never have been penetrated and violated. If this starts to happen again with the pseudo mercenaries caring weapons they need to be shot as armed aggressors, this is all an act, they have no real fight in them. I’m a combat veteran, I know what it takes to stand with brothers in arms in a firefight, it takes training, a lot of it, the mob we have just witnessed would turn tail and run, in fact it would be a stampede as they sought to flee the line of fire. There will be no next time, not if they have any sense of survival, we don’t have anything to fear from that mob. Now we have to go after their organizers and cheer leaders and put them in jail. 5 people died last Wednesday, one of them a police officer defending the capital, that’s unforgivable and should not be forgotten.

Expand full comment

They are funded by Republican Attorney Generals group and other dark money which needs to be rooted out and face legal repercussions.

Expand full comment

I've been wondering about the finances. Pamsy, what's your source for this?

Expand full comment

I think if you read Dark Money by Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow, you will see the the Mercer family and the Kochs are heavy investors. The Walmart kin have their hands in the honey pot also. You have Sheldon Edelman, as well. There are multitudes of the Christian “right” groups. Let’s not forget Franklin Graham. It’s so dirty, it makes your head spin! The Lincoln Project is going to reveal each and every corporation, CEO, and families who have contributed dark money.

Expand full comment

Ruth I’ll try to copy the link here but I’m not sure I know how. It comes from a Daily Kos post from yesterday. I don’t know how credible their sources are but if I can’t put the link here you can check out their website and their stories.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2021/1/8/2007306/-Dark-money-group-behind-Republican-state-attorneys-general-organized-protest-before-the-insurrection

Expand full comment

I tend to disagree with you on this. There are so many pieces in place to have helped this coup. We must act and not be complacent. There were many ex-military veterans and some cops in that insurrection. The republicans, and I blame them for strategically placing their white supremacist radicals in powerful positions for the past 30 years until we reached this critical mass with their trump strategist. I ask everyone to NOT be complacent at what is happening.

I am going over to see what The Lincoln Project is saying. Will see HeathersHerd at 1:00 today --- group therapy!

Expand full comment

I think Americans are going to wake up and learn about what has been going on in our country for decades. Please take care of yourselves and hold on to your seat. This is really not a very pretty picture, yet we need to stay very alert and awake and become active if we want to save our democracy.

Expand full comment

I think the the majority were acting out like teenagers, but a small, trained, group of American terrorists were in the Capitol and dedicated to search and destroy tactics with assigned targets and missions.

Expand full comment

I respectfully disagree. They bashed in windows to break and enter a building, much less a Federal building, they crushed a police officer in a door, beat an officer to death with a fire extinguisher, spread feces and blood around in a hallowed building. These are violent criminals every single last one.

Expand full comment

They had a load of zip tie handcuffs, they had a scaffold with a hangman's noose. The killed a policeman. They were after blood, incited by Donald J. Trump. These are very DANGEROUS people with blood on their hands. As is DJT . Meanwhile, 4,000 people died in one day. That figure is 1,000 more people than in my village. That means every one of my dear neighbors, business people and friends are wiped out. Even the trump supporters.

Expand full comment

The destructiveness of the trained portion of the insurrectionists is the problem. They seemed to be varied, from white supremacist militia weekend warriors to ex-police/military to professionals in expensive tactical combat gear (mercenaries? paid by whom?). An HCR reader who’s a former diplomat posted here a few days ago that in one of the break-in videos, you can hear a man yelling in Russian, “Don’t be afraid!”

Some of these neoNazi militias do have connections to Russian trainers.

Then there is the problem of infiltration of law enforcement agencies by white supremacists. Same problem in Europe as here.

We do not know enough about who they are and who is funding their organizing. But what is becoming clear is that it’s much bigger than we recognized. In Heather’s Bill Moyers talk, she said their numbers are small when looking at the totality, but we on this side have to do more to take up oxygen with our reality-based narrative and with doing the right thing.

https://twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1306680599529295873?s=21

https://twitter.com/splcenter/status/1313498709334908934?s=21

Expand full comment

Yes, Dick. Those "Weekend Warriors" should have been met with overwhelming force, guns drawn, tear gas, batons, just as the BLM protestors were met with, so that they would see that THIS IS NOT A GAME. I wonder: Were they really willing to lay down their lives for Mr. Trump? Because several DID.

Expand full comment

I disagree. Some of us are afraid in our own homes because we live around them. They are talking about more acts of violence on their SM sites. A few opinion pieces state that this insurrection has been a significant recruiting event for their movement. I hope that isn’t true and that they face the most severe punishment.

Expand full comment

This is why we need to act...yesterday. There is only one language people like this understand. Strength and power. We need to be strong and stand up to them now. And our military needs to be on alert.

My national guard neighbor is a trump and proud boy supporter. Doesn't make me feel very confident.

Expand full comment

Pamsy and Penelope Simpson Adams, yes what is happening is terrifying – for our country and communities and for each of us personally. We really do need to act as quickly as possible. As we discussed today, make the phone calls to legislators. That seems to be the best thing to do in this moment but other actions will be necessary in the future.

Expand full comment

From your lips... God I pray that you are right.

Expand full comment

I saw a news article (where?) that a woman had been "trampled to death" - her relative was interviewed - but never saw any other notice of that.

Expand full comment

The woman's name was Rosanne Boyland reported on an Atlanta news station - said she was in Washington when this happened. Just one article - nothing else. If true that brings deaths up to 6.

Expand full comment

She was trampled to death carrying a flag that said "Don't tread on me." The ultimate irony.

Expand full comment

Also, a man at this insurgence, had carried a taser gun. It accidentally went off and tasered his testicles which caused him to have a heart attack and die. I believe he was from Florida.

Expand full comment

My question still is: why no mention of her death - seems as though even if she was involved in this debacle - she at least deserves a mention AND that makes SIX deaths that should be laid on Trump INC.

Expand full comment

These terrorists expose themselves and we must observe, document and expose them for what they are.

Expand full comment

My concerns as well. These are also the concerns of Ron Suskind (interview with Rachel Maddow)

https://youtu.be/Qd8Ry8fJvJs

Expand full comment

Quite a lot of good points to remember.

On the other hand the Russian simplification is

‘Eat bread and salt and speak the Truth.”

Let’s make survival and Truth our goals

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting these here... (note to self, email this list to our new secretary of education and suggest it’s incorporated into all civics classes)

Expand full comment

Yes! He was on Rachel last night, right?! I am eager to read this book!

Expand full comment

Yes. He's been on her show a number of times. I think that is why I bought the book originally.

Expand full comment

is it good?

Expand full comment

Yes, it is quite good and a quick read.

Expand full comment

We used Snyder's book as a discussion starter for a progressive women's group I was a member of before moving to a new state.

Expand full comment

The Cruz tweet explains why conservative columnist Bret Stephens describes him as a “serpent covered in Vaseline.”

But the bilious guile of this hypocritical “call for unity״ suggests that such a characterization is disparaging to both snakes and petroleum jelly.

I’ll quote Genesis to convey my warmest wishes to this cold-blooded, spineless and venomous conniver:

“Because you have done this,

cursed are you above all livestock

and above all beasts of the field;

on your belly you shall go,

and dust you shall eat

all the days of your life.”

Expand full comment

Marsha Blackburn and Bill Hagerty, TN senators (the latter just seated!) also issued an “oh my” statement. Too damn late. They lit the fuse, as did Cruz and especially Hawley.

Expand full comment

Southern women, oh fiddle dee dee!

Expand full comment

Especially Hawley!

Expand full comment

Thank you, HCR. The emerging picture is of an attempted coup. Biden needs to be bold which will be hard for him. There is no reconciliation with the Ted Cruz’s and Mitch McConnell’s and Proud Boys. Prosecute, Vaccinate, and Implement Systemic Change. The Georgia victories enable Change. Jump on it. $2,000 checks. You promised. Now control your party and deliver. Let’s face it: African Americans delivered you the Presidency and Congressional power. Now Use it. Remember FDR’s statement about his enemies: They hate me. And I welcome their hatred. The first two years. The first 100 days: Let’s Go. ❤️🤍💙

Expand full comment

This emerging vile picture of the attempted coup dictates the very action you prescribe Deborah. Biden needs to deliver in the first 100 days and the first two years.

Expand full comment

Not just the Proud Boys. Have a look at the ADLs Anti-Defamation League) website and how many white supremacist and other hate groups there are in the US. Look at the stats, their activities, and so forth. Be warned ... it will make you sick. ADL is on top of what these terrorists are doing in the US.

Expand full comment

I read that Joe Manchin is against the $2000 check. At least Mitch McConnell could rely on all Republicans being horrible to hold them together. I hope Democrats can make deals with their conservative members.

Expand full comment

I just read the article HCR referenced about the interactions between various authorities before and during the attack, and I wonder about something.

Aside from all the to-ing and fro-ing between D.C. police, Capitol police, DoD, and National Guard commanders, there seems to be one large group left unnamed. I thought the Department of Homeland Security was created for the express purpose after the 9/11 attacks to coordinate security and prevent this kind of paralyzing clusterf**k. Where were they? If the Bureau of Prisons, for cryin' out loud, can be dispatched last summer to protect the Lincoln Memorial, an unoccupied lump of stone no one wanted to seize, where were they, with all their vaunted "intelligence," when an entire branch of our government was invaded by insurrectionists?

Expand full comment

And who is illegally still acting in charge of DHS? Another Trump Orc.....just like the people he named to the DOD recently and resisted calls for useful and timely deployment of the National Guard! The net needs spreading wide indeed to capture the whole treasonous conspiracy. Not acting when you should is complicity...;as well as cowardice.

Expand full comment

Hey, Stuart, I was writing my reply before seeing yours. They sorta mirror each other.

Expand full comment

I was thinking about Homeland Security, too, Dan. Where were they. But other than D.C. police and state national guards, all the rest are federal? That means 45 holds the ultimate power to deploy?

Expand full comment

That's always been my fear, that Trump would be able to deploy those quasi-military forces under DHS. Even if the Pentagon remains loyal to the Constitutional transfer of power, I've no idea what they would do if the were presented with a fait accompli by DHS, backed by contractors hired by DeVos' brother.

Expand full comment

"If it has a silver lining, it is that the lines are now clear between our democracy and its enemies."

Thank you ... this is the *one* sentence I have read in the past several days that gives me some solace.

We really should stop saying "this is not who we are" and instead, have the courage and self-awareness to recognize that this is exactly who some of us are.

Expand full comment

Yes Vijay! I think we need to ask the question “who are we now?”

Expand full comment

Or “who do we want to be from now on?”

Expand full comment

In an opinion piece, “This is Not Who We Are, Actually, the Capitol Riot was Quintessentially American,” in the Anchorage Daily News by Omar Waso:

“There’s no disputing that the assault was remarkable. But “un-American” is the wrong adjective. A better way to make sense of the news of the past few days — not only the violent occupation in Washington but also the historic Senate victories by Democrats in Georgia — is as a long-run contest between two competing American traditions: one committed to preserving the status quo racial hierarchy and one fighting to advance equality.”

Worth a read.

https://www.adn.com/opinions/national-opinions/2021/01/07/this-is-not-who-we-are-actually-the-capitol-riot-was-quintessentially-american/

Expand full comment

My fellow readers, Please forgive this overlong post, but I thought you might appreciate this perspective from a legal journalist here in Germany. Max Steinbeis edits the weekly publication Verfassungsblog (Constitutionblog), which deals with Constitutional issues in Europe and the US.

Excerpt from “Verfassungsblog” by Max Steinbeis

January 8, 2021

“Wednesday's riot on Capitol Hill … was not about any matter of democratic politics. It was about the condition of the possibility of democratic politics itself.

The storming of the Capitol was not just a protest rally that got out of hand, not just the voice of some political faction making itself heard. While outside the glass panes were shattering, inside Congress was about to formally certify that Joe Biden's voters had outnumbered those of Donald Trump. To delay, if not to prevent, this resolution, and to force the appointed elected officials into hiding as they were doing that – that was what the rioters actually achieved. Think about that.

These people had penetrated not just symbolically, but literally into the very heart of democracy.

Many of the rioters, on their way to and from the scene, appeared happy to readily oblige anyone who asked them about their motives and intentions, cheerfully revealing in perfect candour that they regarded the Capitol their property. This is our house! Those guys work for us! We just take back what has been stolen from us! They had been outvoted according to the rules of the constitution, they had lost all court cases, there was no longer even the flimsiest semblance of justification for their claim to power. Only violence, of which the violence on Capitol Hill was just the most visible expression.

The legal title they invoked for their claim was not a constitutional one, not even in disguise. The supposed ownership of the center of power that these people claim for themselves is not based on the constitution, but in sharpest opposition to it. Its basis is the notion that an electoral outcome in which "folks like us" (male, white, Christian) end up in the position of the minority cannot inherently be a legitimate one. This notion is categorically incompatible with democratic politics. No president, however benevolent, will be able to reconcile and achieve unity with this as a matter of democratic politics.

Of course, Biden's task will ultimately have to be to try to return to a state where it will be possible again to engage in democratic politics with 74 million Trump voters and nearly 50% of them readily supporting the insurrection. But right now, the conflict at hand is constitutional, not political. That task is not to compromise and "heal" and "unite" but to find and open a way to return to constitutionally ordered politics, in order to fight one another for what each, as opposed to the other, finds right as fiercely as they can.

The way to reach that goal, and I admit that this might be a very European or even German way of looking at things, leads across a field that will take much longer to traverse than Biden's time in office: re-establishing a distinction between what is political and what is constitutional. That electoral districting, judicial elections, and parliamentary procedural rules are constitutional, not political. That gun control and campaign contribution caps are political, not constitutional. That the constitution is not a scripture revealing the will of some semi-mythical 18th-century founder figures to be revered on one's knees, but has a very much this-worldly function under which it can be interpreted, namely to make democratic politics possible by means of procedures, institutions and fundamental rights. And not only interpreted, but also criticized and corrected. Among the greatest faults of the U.S. Constitution is that it is virtually unamendable, just as one of the greatest faults of the British Constitution is that it is too easily amended. Both faults have the same effect of fatally blurring the distinction between the political and the constitutional.

For the time being, this may be the one glimmer of hope that broke through the inky January sky over Washington on this dark Wednesday afternoon: Those GOP functionaries who now, at the very last moment under the pressure of the unfolding events, seem to have finally deserted the sinking Trumpist ship can now to some extent be expected to paddle away from it as fast as they can. To restore confidence, they will have to make clear that they respect the conditions of the possibility of democratic politics and are willing to let go of the racist and anti-constitutional notion that anyone can have a qua natura claim to power over others at all.

Finally. And why shouldn't that be politically attractive after all, especially when measured against the alternatives? They could leave it to the Trumpists to appeal to bigots, alt-rights and white supremacists and pick up those who find that company despicable despite being white, not in possession of a college degree and living in a rural area, and the votes of socially conservative African and Latinx Americans on top of it. They could leave it to the Democrats to keep the metropolitan tech and hedge-fund billionaires on both coasts rich and happy, and start addressing the concerns of those who have not profited from their prosperity.

In a European context, this agenda would be called christian-social, I guess. Not something I would ever vote for, to be sure, but undoubtedly a legitimate and overdue politicization of a dramatically underpoliticized conflict. A conflict of the sort democratic politics under a functional constitution should be perfectly able to process.

The full essay can be found here: https://verfassungsblog.de/?na=v&nk=5663-9dc391ae31&id=400

Expand full comment

The sad irony here is that "white, male, christians" are not even close to being in the minority - they are still the majority. They fear that they will become equal - and instead of seeing it as a positive, they are afraid of losing what should never have been their "right" in the first place. Just like wage equality, they don't realize that paying people what they are worth and raise minimum wages, doesn't mean reducing their wages!

Expand full comment

According to Trading Economics, 50.52% of the American population is women, which means that white, Christian males are not the majority. Hence, their fear.

Expand full comment

Excellent concept: separating the constitutional from the political! This line has definitely been blurred in American politics.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this.

Expand full comment

Some things don't change.....lynching in the Wild West when the sherrif couldn't or wouldn't control the crowd.....lynching in the South when Coloured people dared to raise their heads.....lynching in front of the Capitol when people want their votes counted. And it's always the same people building and using the gibbet!

Fools and liers incite the crowds to mayhem at their peril if they have not the wherewithal to control how and where it will end. Madmen don't care as destruction is their only objective. Incompetents overestimate their own importance and organizational skills thinking somehow they are in control.....but someone else will of course fill in the gaps they have left and make it happen.

The people cannot allow fools, liers, madmen and incompetents anywhere near power again! It's down to the people and their educated choices.......and their ability to tell right from wrong, fact from fiction and truth from lies. The first place to start is at home. The Democratic party must now at least show the example that they want imposed as the norm and thus impose both moral and electoral superiority on the Republican Orcs. Then we can go forward with a little more certainty as the people will be listened to, informed frankly, treated fairly and loyally served.

Incitement to violence, insurrection and attempted overthrow of the legitimate government are criminal offences. We have often talked of Trump's treasonous acquiescence in Putin's games, now the Courts can hoist him on his own Petard, so to speak, hang out to dry metaphorically and flush him down the drain of history. Treason is not a pardonable offense it would seem to me and Impeachment after the Inauguration is not going to achieve much. If it can't be done this coming week with the Senate called into special session then another way has to be found. How about going against the DOJ's policy of not charging a sitting President. Trump should now be arrested by Rob Rosenstein, charged with treason, arraigned and incarcerated awaiting trial. Then the next time the crowds try to amass in Washington then you treat them like they treated BLM demos.

Expand full comment

Wondering how treason and the pardon power interact... I don't like the DOJ memo that says a President can't be indicted. This is the time for it especially when the other processes available take too long or are too immersed in party politics.

Expand full comment

If you've ever wondered like I have why the Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors, in British Law well understood by the Founders people in high positions in the government were held to a higher standard, hence even a misdemeanor by a person in a position of power can have huge impact. It is wrong to have the President be above the law.

Expand full comment

We can thank Barr Nun for that!

Expand full comment

Discussions on the unitary executive theory of the President has been around since 1787. Barr Nothing took it to the nth degree.

Expand full comment

All points well taken, impeachment would negate post presidential provision of support and security for life ... it would be worth doing for that alone, unless there are other ways to deny him/her that ongoing support ... what a hustle!!

Expand full comment

It would probably be difficult to campaign from prison

Expand full comment

As I understand it, ex-presidents are provided with a lifetime income amounting to millions, as well as security detail for ongoing protection ... apparently, impeachment would negate that support. Is that the only way to deny that support?

Expand full comment

There will always be people who will provide Trump with money. The prospect of him being forced to give up his ongoing grifts of our money through his protective detail's room and board is delicious, though.

Expand full comment

The president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” That alone makes it worth impeaching him.

Expand full comment

But can he still wreak havoc WHILE he is being impeached? Or is it only after the House votes for impeachment that that holds?

Expand full comment

Every seditious republicans and news media outlet that spews lies should be held accountable and forced, as part of social justice, to tell the people every single lie they have spewed-- is a lie. Beginning with Birtherism. Every single liar needs to tell the truth, including

Immediate arrests and removal from offices of all of trumps cronies who are part of this coup. And this Immediate removal of the trump family and their comrades. We need to make new rules we have never needed. Let them sue America. We need to take control our our country immediately. This stinks to high heaven of Putin.

Expand full comment

OMG! What a dream come true it would be to see him in handcuffs and taken out! Now nothing less than that will satisfy me!

Expand full comment

Along with the Seditious Caucus and 148 repubs that signed on to invalidate our election. All of them need to be thrown in the clinker and not allowed out until they tell their fellow seditionists this was all lies to overthrow our government and make DJT king.

Expand full comment

That idea has its charms. Most of these people KNOW that there was nothing fraudulent about the election. They should be forced to loudly, publicly, and repeatedly acknowledge that they knew it and that they spread the lies intentionally. That includes Trump.

Expand full comment

a straightjacket would be helpful.

Expand full comment

Thank you Heather.

This train wreck we are watching is beyond disturbing. The changing patterns of what is actually happening may be something we will never know, or atleast in our lifetime. What we do know is that insurrection weighs heavier than Trumps garden variety daily lies.

I had posted on Facebook a simple question, why weren't the doors of the Capital barricaded from the outside to hold the terrorists inside until each one of them could be arrested instead of escorting them out? Why? What was Homeland Security's involvement in this, yes it is a double meaning question. Why was security for an event that was to be attended by the President so grossly "unprepared ". How were the terrorists able to have a hangmans noose and platform erected near the Capital?

4 years ago, I was the coordinator for a 2 city event that Bill Clinton spoke at. Anyone working the event had to have rather high Secret Service clearance, which I had. The details were precise at every turn. As it should be. One of the images I keep seeing from the riots this week are the barricades. Why would they use easily movable, lightweight , non crowd controlling barricades at an event that had a permit for 30,000 people to attend and they knew the audience? Nothing makes sense, but yet maybe it actually does.

Insurrection in the year 2021 is a far cry from civil unrest.

Be safe, be well.

Expand full comment

I have wondered whether the rioters had help from inside, police who sided with them.

Expand full comment

I don’t think there is any doubt.

Expand full comment

Most of the police officers present risked, and in one case lost, their lives protecting lawmakers and staff from the mob. The important question is how and why police leadership failed utterly to prepare an adequate defense.

Expand full comment

Of course there was help, both inside and outside.

Expand full comment

I just found a video posted by Shawn King. The police stand to the side to allow trumpers walk into the White House. https://www.facebook.com/shaunking/videos/3838839702821586

Expand full comment

I have seen that. Sickening to think there isn’t any security.

Expand full comment

This is highly disturbing. Facebook is taking down videos that show the police accommodating trumpers by standing to the side as they walked into the White House, and by opening a gate for them. Any questions, ask Shawn King, who posted the videos.

Facebook also took down HCR's January 8 post.

The link below takes you to a video by David Doel (Rational National) showing the police actually opening the gates so that trumpers can walk in. https://www.facebook.com/TRNShow/videos/153668179622975

Expand full comment

Heather mentions chatter about more attacks. Can someone explain to me, please, why it is sensible to inaugurate Biden and Harris on the steps of the Capitol. Isn't that too exposed, a security nightmare? Taking the oath there makes a statement, but how can we even trust security after what happened on Wednesday?

Expand full comment

Standing tall on the Capital steps will show the world that the Republic has not fallen, that it will not be intimidated.

Expand full comment

I agree. I think it would send the wrong message if they weren’t there.

Expand full comment

I thought the inauguration was to be virtual? I agree, it's too unsafe to have Biden/Harris sworn in in such an open space.

Expand full comment

Wasn't it Reagan's second Inauguration when it was so cold that they moved inside the House or Senate chamber? Maybe do that this time? But I get what you say about showing the world they aren't intimidated by this.

Expand full comment

I get both sides of this discussion, absolutely. But I simply don't trust DJT or his mob.

Expand full comment

The response, or lack thereof, has made me wonder if some of the law enforcement was supportive of the attack on the Capitol Building.

Expand full comment

I’m thinking that the changes Trump made to the pentagon and attorney general were to support this.

Expand full comment

I’ve wondered about that, too. I’ve also wondered if the change in Georgia federal attorney was intended to manufacture election fraud charges.

Expand full comment

BJ Pak is well regarded, across party lines. My guess is that he was presented with having to cross a line, and he refused.

Expand full comment

I think so. He has steadily been putting people in positions who aren't necessarily qualified but are loyal to him. I've seen this coming, unfortunately.

Expand full comment

Marie, I think you are spot on. trump has consistently put incompetent “loyalists” in place. His most recent moves of rearranging the “deck chairs” was puzzling but now is crystal clear.

Expand full comment

The reenactment on the steps of a DC church of the killing of George Floyd staged for photos has to be the vilest moment shown in this article.

Expand full comment

I know. These are vile, criminal people. This is shock and awe on our own people. it must be put down immediately. They have more plans coming. Nip. It. In. The. Bud.

Expand full comment

OMG, how did I not see that? Probably best that I didn't.

Expand full comment

It just keeps being revealed how deep and pervasive this coup on our country is.

Expand full comment

I'm really curious as to who the man in the suit & tie & topcoat towards the right in the first picture ? Certainly doesnt appear to feel threatened at all - see that?

Expand full comment

Good question - he certainly doesn't fit in, but seems not to be treated with suspicion.

Expand full comment

They were. They opened the barrier and let them in and then took selfies with the rioters once they were inside

Expand full comment

I don’t believe there’s any doubt about that.

Expand full comment

Ted Cruz is an angry, contemptible, useless man - just another rabble rouser. He is another one who just spews out angry, vile statements. To put any of this, in any capacity, is absurd and insane. Biden is not The President. It is the President's job to promote unity and healing. I hope to God that He is censured.

Expand full comment

In all of the writing about Cruz in the aftermath of the insurrection, nothing that I've come across describes his links to Christian Nationalism. It's a factor in Texas politics and the Governor, Lt. Governor, Atty Gen'l, and many state legislators have direct ties to those who lead the Christian Nationalist movement. It's authoritarian and anti-democratic and it hides behind a facade of religious freedom and priestly robes. It's also pertinent to point out that movements whose leaders receive revelation and direction from God have a license to do anything to further their cause.

Expand full comment

Now my head really is exploding......

Expand full comment

Is there any chance?

Expand full comment