It was instructive to watch the segment on Ginni Thomas on MSNBC last evening, during Rachel's hour, if I recall correctly. Clarence has voted on cases in which there has been a conflict of interest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IemrkukybJ8
The commentator pointed out that SCOTUS has no code of ethics.
AND that John Roberts is ineffect…
It was instructive to watch the segment on Ginni Thomas on MSNBC last evening, during Rachel's hour, if I recall correctly. Clarence has voted on cases in which there has been a conflict of interest.
The commentator pointed out that SCOTUS has no code of ethics.
AND that John Roberts is ineffectual in managing the court by not having Clarence recuse himself...among other issues indicating an absence of leadership.
It was instructive to watch the segment on Ginni Thomas on MSNBC last evening, during Rachel's hour, if I recall correctly. Clarence has voted on cases in which there has been a conflict of interest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IemrkukybJ8
The commentator pointed out that SCOTUS has no code of ethics.
AND that John Roberts is ineffectual in managing the court by not having Clarence recuse himself...among other issues indicating an absence of leadership.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/01/31/is-ginni-thomas-a-threat-to-the-supreme-court
Thanks for the clip of Mehdi Hassan talking with Jane Mayer. She did some fine investigative work in writing the article.
I just posted her article, in response to a comment above.
Actually, it was Mehdi Hassan, with his sly humor.
Oops. That's right.