547 Comments

That so many of the Islamic and Arab countries have called for a peaceful resolution based on a two-state solution is encouraging. Perhaps the Israelis will finally see the light, and end their persecution of Palestine, and Hamas will be out of power. A glimmer of hope in a situation that has festered for too long.

Expand full comment

Like Putin, Netanyahu is betting that Trump will return to the White House, thus allowing him and his right-wing fanatics to destroy any hope of a two-state solution and kill many more Palestinians.

Expand full comment

You are so right, if the bull in the China shop cheats his way back in, Putin and Netanyahu think their problems will be over. Seems that Joe’s enemies in this country give aid and comfort to our enemies abroad.

Expand full comment

There are people in this country who air weakness they find in Biden having to do with the Willows Project, oil drilling project by ConocoPhillips located on the plain of the North Slope of Alaska in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska entirely on wetlands; attacks on the rights and lives of Black people, homosexuals, women, and other groups; on our public schools, its curriculums and books; the embrace and funding of Israel's war, which is decimating the Palestinians, etc., - without supporting Trump and the Republicans who follow him or abandoning their determination for another Biden term as president. Biden's commitment to the welfare of the American people will grow with these voices. It is our right as citizens to convey our opinions; support the principles of democracy and encourage our leaders to be the of best public servants for the people.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

The bull in the China shop is America. Genocide Joe is giving aid (bombs) and comfort (no to a ceasefire) to Israel. Just to clear that up.

https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/i-dont-care-what-religion-the-genocidal

“The other day Tony Blinken posted an astonishingly obnoxious tweet fretting about how “This has been an extraordinarily dangerous year for press around the world,” as though his own administration had not directly facilitated the lion’s share of the deadly attacks on journalists in 2023. The utter gall of these freaks still surprises me sometimes.”

Expand full comment

Anybody who spews Genocide Joe is giving aid and comfort to Putin.

Expand full comment

He's crossed over into a troll. Don't engage

Expand full comment

I wish we had an ignore or mute option so as not to even have to see such ridiculous comments.

Expand full comment

I've reported, Miselle.

Expand full comment

The troll should not be reading Heather Cox Richardson's letters and should not be making his/her stupid remarks.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!

Anybody who doesn’t think Biden is complicit in genocide spews ignorance and/or a total denial of reality.

Edited to add - Jeri, the best thing about calling out Genocide Joe is watching you spew weak, imperialist American propaganda in response, and then watching the Team Blue lemming commenters here rush to your defense with a wave of ‘likes’. Tickles me no end.

Expand full comment

Anyone who thinks genocide applies here has the IQ of a kumquat. If Israel remotely wanted to commit genocide, all it had to do was drop a hundred thermobaric bombs on Gaza, and poof, 2.2 million Gazans are ash, ready to be 'dozed into the Med. Instead, Israel is in the third straight month of through Gaza slogging building, with more months to come, crippling its own economy by NOT just killing every Gazan ever born with a bombing wave reminiscent of Dresden.

Some "genocide."

It's war, one Hamas brought on itself voluntarily by massacring more than 1,000 Israeli innocents. All Hamas has to do to end it is say two little words: "We surrender." But since it insists on fighting to the bitter end, IDF will oblige. The non-combatant Gazans also dying? That's because Hamas hides its fighters inside the civilian population. The IDF fights right out in the open, not shielding itself with babies. If Hamas did the same, no innocents would be dead. Of course Gazans are going to die, in great numbers; it's what happens to the human shields of psychopaths.

Have the guts to blame the right party for the death of 20,000+ Gazans, Tom: not Israel, but Hamas. Absent the Hamas pogrom, both parties would have celebrated New Year's with Champagne, not high explosives.

Expand full comment

Tom High, "Tickles me no end." You live in a sad world.

Expand full comment

Genocide is killing to exterminate an ethnic or religious group. You may call what Israel is doing war or even murder, but it is not genocide, and using that word gets in the way of progress. (Hamas, on the other hand, really does intend genocide, and says so publicly.) U.S. options are limited, because Israel is an ally, not a satellite, and we can try to influence, but not control her behavior.

Expand full comment

'South Africa’s genocide case against Israel sets up a high-stakes legal battle at the UN’s top court'

'WHAT IS SOUTH AFRICA’S ARGUMENT?'

'South Africa’s 84-page filing says Israel’s actions “are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part” of the Palestinians in Gaza.'

'It asks the ICJ, also known as the world court, for a series of legally binding rulings. It wants the court to declare that Israel “has breached and continues to breach its obligations under the Genocide Convention,” and to order Israel to cease hostilities in Gaza that could amount to breaches of the convention, to offer reparations, and to provide for reconstruction of what it’s destroyed in Gaza.'

'The filing argues that genocidal acts include killing Palestinians, causing serious mental and bodily harm, and deliberately inflicting conditions meant to “bring about their physical destruction as a group.” And it says statements by Israeli officials express genocidal intent.'

'South Africa argues that the court has jurisdiction because both countries are signatories of the genocide convention. The convention’s ninth article says disputes between nations over the convention can be submitted to the International Court of Justice.'

'Many South Africans, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, have compared Israel’s policies regarding Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank with South Africa’s past apartheid regime of racial segregation. Israel rejects such allegations.'

'WHAT WAS ISRAEL’S RESPONSE?'

'Israel’s government swiftly rejected the genocide claim. A Foreign Ministry statement said South Africa’s case lacks a legal foundation and constitutes a “despicable and contemptuous exploitation” of the court.'

'Eylon Levy, an official in the Israeli prime minister’s office, on Tuesday accused South Africa of “giving political and legal cover” to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas that triggered Israel’s campaign. But he confirmed that Israel would send a legal team to the Hague “to dispel South Africa’s absurd blood libel,” he said.'

'An Israeli official said the country, which has a history of ignoring international tribunals, decided to defend itself for several reasons. Among them are Israel’s role in promoting the original genocide convention after the Holocaust and its belief that “we have a strong case.” He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes deliberations.'

'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to press ahead with the war until Hamas is crushed and the more than 100 hostages still held by the militant group in Gaza are freed. He’s said that could take several more months.'

'WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?'

'South Africa’s filing includes a request for the court to urgently issue legally binding interim orders for Israel to' “immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza.”

https://apnews.com/article/un-court-south-africa-israel-gaza-genocide-71be2ce7f09bfee05a7cae26689ee262

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

BS. Genocide, ethnic cleansing, mass murder of innocents…. all are applicable.

As to ‘control her behavior’…. BS. Reagan did it in the 80s when Israel bombed refugee camps in Lebanon. You threaten to withhold military aid, and mean it. Biden doesn’t have the guts to piss off the Israeli lobby nor the MIC. Without the U.S., there is no Israel; it most certainly is a satellite, and has been in a geopolitical context since the Iranian Revolution got rid of the Shah.

https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/theyre-calling-ethnic-cleansing-voluntary

And if you’d like a more detailed look at why what Israel is doing is indeed a genocide, here you go. You’re welcome.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/01/03/the-genocide-will-be-televised/

Expand full comment

Obtuse comes to mind. Thinking requires seeing more thsn the brick wall in your lane. I will expect an adolescent response to verify your deep as a birdbath mode of thinking.

Expand full comment

Words have meanings, and in order to communicate it's important to show some discipline in using them. Your loose use of the loaded word genocide puts you in the same group as Elise Stefanik. Are you comfortable in the company of such a person?

I also note that you do not comment on Hamas' clearly expressed intent to commit genocide, or its horrible, inhuman and unlawful acts on October 7th, or its continuing crimes against humanity by holding hostages and embedding its combatants in civilian areas. Nor do you mention that Hamas spent billions on weapons and tunnels to use for military purposes, but nothing to protect civilians against the Israeli response that it has said it wanted to generate. Why that double-standard? (Whether Israel should have reacted as it did is another question.)

Expand full comment

@Jon Margolis. There it is. Thank you. Well said.

Expand full comment

Your pal Caitlin is a lunatic. She spends thousands of words condemning Israel for, well, everything, but particularly for "slaughtering fucking children." OK, I hate slaughtered fucking children too, so I went through her backlog to see how harshly she condemned Hamas for slaughtering, you know, fucking children, as well as for baking a baby in an oven, raping women, dismembering women, butchering children, burning Israelis alive, machinegunning innocents driving by on the highway--the whole psychopathic playbook. Here's the sum total of what ol' Caitlin had to say about the Hamas pogrom on Oct. 8:

"Ultimately this is just Palestinians doing what they feel they need to do out of total desperation . . ."

Goebbels is smiling from Hell.

Get back to us when you have something remotely intelligent to say about Israel-Palestine-United States. Everything you've posted today, including "Genocide Joe," is useless unless you hate Israel, in which case it's been splendid.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

You’re the lunatic. Every one of your examples of the horrors of 10/7 have been either been removed from context, totally debunked, or shown to be committed by the IDF.

Could be why many of the survivors of the music festival ‘slaughter’ are suing the Israel government.

You don’t hate slaughtered children; were that the case, you wouldn’t countenance it under any circumstances.

More Caitlin for you - https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-says-its-anti-semitic-to-invoke

“False accusations of anti-semitism are all Israel and its defenders have left. It’s the only tool left in their toolbox. Once you’ve exhausted the “But Hamas!” and “But October 7!” excuses they make for Israel’s deliberate butchery of civilians via airstrikes and siege warfare, false accusations of hating Jews is all that remains.

And it’s so sick, because it exploits a healthy impulse in those of us who oppose racism and genocide, and does so in order to defend racist acts of genocide. It causes people who care deeply about human rights to take a step back and say “Hold on, am I guilty of embodying the same hateful prejudices which led to the Holocaust?” and shuts us down and shuts us up, even as Israel rolls out its own holocaust against Palestinians.”

Excuses for deliberate butchery. That’s all you’ve got here, Shane.

Own it.

Expand full comment

War IS deliberately butchery. If Hamas didn't want their own people butchered by the machinery of modern warfare, all it had to do was stay home in October and Israel would have done zip, zero, nada. Hamas chose badly, and the people it governs are doing the suffering for their elected leaders' psychopathy.

Own that.

P.S. I didn't call you, or her, antisemitic. Far as I know, your hatred is aimed solely at Israel's conduct of the war. I profoundly disagree with your complaints about that, but nothing you've written makes me belive you or she are antisemitic.

Expand full comment

I recognize a troller. 😈

Expand full comment

Anyone, like Caitlin, who has to use profanity to bolster their argument is coming from an already weakened position. It's an adolescent attempt at creating shock so they can demonstrate how "controversial" they are. Do better.

Expand full comment

Excellent clueless comment, mother. Can I have a cookie now?

Expand full comment

I think we can be angry with Biden's weakness and ineffectiveness re Netanyahu- our unconditional support- WITHOUT calling Biden Genocide Joe. You shoot yourself in the foot about the point with name calling.

Expand full comment

No, I bring the Team Blue jump-circle genocide defenders out into the light so they can be recognized. Those whose party-line allegiance clouds their understanding of right and wrong, and contributes to their defending the indefensible.

He is Genocide Joe. He’s made plenty of disastrous political decisions in his career, from dissing Anita Hill and putting Thomas on the Court, to aiding and abetting mass incarceration, student debt, and endless war. Nothing comes close to aiding and abetting the slaughter in Gaza, which he could have ended with a phone call.

Wouldn’t shock me one bit if he stumbles us into a war in the Middle East. As long as we’re talking shooting feet here.

Expand full comment

I'm upset about the way Biden gave permission to Netanyahu. This was an emotional response and what has ensued is a disaster for Palestinians and Israel. They are trying to work it out now but Netanyahu is in charge with us or without us.. Without our involvement in the ME and Ukraine, things would be a lot different. We overall have an important role to play. Biden has been too reticent in Ukraine, though essential, very good, no question. Ukraine needs help and the Euros are stepping up now. At home Biden has done tremendously well. Team Red on the other hand has devolved into something very toxic and dangerous for this country. We have to stop thinking in terms of partisanship. I wish for the old Republicans, gone now. Conservatism has been corrupted and has gone to something else.

Expand full comment

You insist on your Team Blue categorization which in its opposition has to dig deep to make that the primary issue here and you fail. You fail because this push behind Biden is more than about Team Blue, sir. It’s about the country. As far as war in the Middle East goes we either have it go all out or it cools down. Biden/US is only one player and a weaker one than in the past in this more multi dimensional situation. Spiro Agnew’s term “Nattering Nabob of Negativism” is useful. People evolve. Or should.

Expand full comment

Oops, sorry, Miselle has it right.

Expand full comment

Israel, since 1948, has met antagonism with antagonism, continuously dispossessing and displacing its Palestinian opponents in the process. Has it been Israel’s goal to eliminate the Palestinian people and their culture?

Expand full comment

Zionists, who dominate Israel’s government at present, and who have been a major force throughout its history, certainly want Palestinians either ethically cleansed or oppressed.

Expand full comment

Amen!

Expand full comment

Aid and comfort and lots of it! Johnson et al should be ashamed.

Expand full comment

The earlier that Netanyahu is forced from power the better. Today would not be too soon. But it will be vital that he is not replaced by someone as narrow as he is.

Expand full comment

Agreed.

Maybe once Netanyahu is gone, cooler more competent heads will prevail. And his expiration date is probably being moved up as the investigations unfold as to how October 7th happened. Don't something like 75% of Israelis want him gone?

It's encouraging that so many Gulf states envision a two state solution sans Hamas. If Hamas is not purged, there will never be a lasting peace.

What worries me a lot is the influence and activities of the ultra extremist "settlers" and their supporters who are committing crimes in the West Bank - murder and the theft of ancestral lands. They undermine their own nation's integrity and security.

Expand full comment

Right you are.

Expand full comment

I worry that if Trump returns to power, the support for Netanyahu will be 100%. And that will please Putin. And Ukraine will be left by the wayside.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

Exactly. Just one more reason he cannot be permitted to attain the presidency again.

Expand full comment

We owe it to the entire world not to let Trump regain access to the Oval.

Expand full comment

I share your concern.

Expand full comment

I should have added......: and there will be no peace

Expand full comment

If Ukraine is abandoned, Putin will feel empowered to attack other countries like Poland...

Expand full comment

Jon, did you read the Counterpunch article? The writer included a link to a letter sent to the NY Times in 1948 signed by Hannah Arendt & Albert Einstein plus several more people. I went online & it was, in truth, an actual letter. Interesting reading.

And yes, Netanyahu really does the Israelis a disservice to put it mildly. Past time!

Expand full comment

Netanyahu and his ilk have made it worse for sane Jews in America and in other countries by his actions. He too, has adopted being a “strongman”. He has ruined Israel.

Expand full comment

Too bad the AIPAC lobby & others voices are so loud.

What he and his cohorts are doing to the Palestinian people and quite honestly, to the Israelis right now - beyond the slaughter of non-Hamas civilians is and will create more fighters for Hamas and more hatred towards Israelis AND Americans! How hard is that to understand?

Expand full comment

I have a newsflash for you: There is no conceivable replacement for Netanyahu who will support a two-state solution. The reason for that is simple. October 7 killed the two-state solution. Any politician who supported or advocated for it would be rejected by the Israeli people. For obvious reasons, they’ve come to disbelieve in it.

Expand full comment

But a two-state solution is the only way to attain a durable peace. Full stop. So it is necessary to work did that even when it seems impossible.

Expand full comment

Well, I don’t wish to be rude, but I feel compelled to point out that a solution neither party wants is no solution. You’ve fallen into the error of making a picture, as Napoleon put it in a military context: seeing thing the way you want to see them, not the way they are. Instead, you might try thinking yourself into the mentality of the average Israeli and the average Palestinian. Those are the people whose attitudes are relevant. And those people have no interest in a two-state solution. What you or I or Anthony Blinken or Joe Biden may think is irrelevant. This leads me to think that the right policy going forward is one that conforms to that reality. And that means , first, putting our own preferences to the side.

Expand full comment

Do you not believe that Israelis and Palestinians must find some way to live together? If not, what then? If so, how?

Expand full comment

I don't think I quite agree. If Hamas truly ceases to be a power in Gaza, the biggest obstacle to the two state solution is removed. And as for Bibi, October 7 has disproved the theory that having right wing maniacs in charge can keep anyone safe.

Expand full comment

No. Recall how the overwhelming majority of Palestinians, both in Gaza and the West Bank, cheered the October 7 pogrom. The big obstacle to a two-state solution is genocidal, river-to-sea Palestinian nationalism.

It’s all very well for American progressives to talk up a two-state solution. The resultant terrorist state wouldn’t be right next door to them. After all that has happened, why should the Israeli people take a chance like that? Well, they won’t. Even the Israeli Left has soured on the peace process and the two-state solution. Think you can talk them around? Good luck with that.

Expand full comment

There grows in today’s pieces/letters/posts a general principle inside my head. So, the players in these negotiations -whether it’s here ,there , or anywhere have PEACE the object based upon TRUTHS...is an operative anyone who sits at this table of solution negotiating?

Killing is never the answer, never has been, never will be , the innocents play too high a price , are presented as the bargaining chip. 20,000 dead over 60% + women and children brought into our livings rooms as what ? to be informed? A high mucky muck (mm) killed along with several others ( assumably also high mm’s) a conquest ? well knowing next in command could be worse but definitely already named for ‘in the position’?

If so, our scrutiny of who’s next in line is critical. The present ‘presidents’ precedents are well known ....but is it truth , is it PEACE, is it retaliation, is it consistent in message and action. Must we always wait for somebody to prove beyond the doubt shadow, or trust they aren’t insiders playing with words,lives,hidden agendas?

Track records? and Tact? Do they speak Truth? How many words, actions, bombs, dead, destruction, or lies however cleverly structured or reconstructed does it take?

Huh?

Huh.

I’m VOTING BLUE💙💙

Expand full comment

And of course, many Israelis, civilians and IDF soldiers, will also be killed. The killing must stop!

Expand full comment

And if it could just be made more clear that the reason Trump is in this position of power is because he is so controlled and “owned” by Putin and Netanyahu and probably others. He does what they tell him to do and then his Magamates do what he tells them to do. He in fact is a very frightened, impotent, not very intelligent puppet.

Expand full comment

You had me right up until the last sentence. Don't underestimate his intelligence. His baffoonery is an act. It makes him relatable to the masses of uncritical thinkers who follow him.

Expand full comment

Wonder whether Israeli bots are supporting that happening as well as Russian bots.

Expand full comment

Speaking of festering, why did Netanyahu SUPPORT Hamas for so many years?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

Thank you for this eye-popping article that bolsters the fact that Netanyahu and his right-wingers will go to limitless lengths until they obliterate all Palestinians out of Israel. Bibi is no "friend" of ours as long as his army is handing out rifles to the settlers! He wants nothing to do with the notion of a two-state solution...or peace for that matter. This genocide of Gaza has got to stop. NO MORE ANNUAL MILITARY AID TO ISRAEL!!!

Expand full comment

I agree Sophia. Israel has a robust military. If it were up to Netanyahu all Palestinians would be killed under the guise of going after Hamas

Expand full comment

I agree. The only way to stop Netanyahu is to demand be step down or the US stops sending them money, like they are our belligerent child

Expand full comment

John Schmeeckle "https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/"

FWIW: To add validity.

"𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙, 𝑤𝑒 (MediaBiasFactCheck<dot>com) 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑠 𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑡-𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑖𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡. 𝑊𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝐻𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡-𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑘 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑."

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

Because it is always in the best interest of a dictator to be able to point focus to an external enemy. Which, John, you already know.

Expand full comment

Haaretz also pointed this out, as Bibi’s move to avoid a two-state solution. The settlements he encourages make it harder still.

Expand full comment

Good point

Expand full comment

Here's an article from Haaretz, talking about what is really going on in the Gaza campaign:

https://archive.is/RauFq

Expand full comment

Yes, but Israel's vision and mission is for Jews as well as "followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety where their lives, possessions and rights are concerned". Quoted from Article 6 of the Hamas Charter.

So, just a 2 state solution is insufficient unless Jewish settlers in Palestine and Gaza coexist in security and safety as citizens of Palestinian, or Morocco, Syria, Lebanon. Iran, and all other theocracy based countries.

What we should be shooting for are reforms away from ancient "beliefs and practices resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance or a false conception of causation" (Websters definition of superstition). People should be able to walk to shul, mosque or church, wear veils. kippah, or mantilla or what ever cultural garment they choose in security and safety.

Expand full comment

Sorry. The Encyclopedia Brittanica quotes the following:

“Hamas continued to reject the legitimacy of Israel, and hard-liners within the organization remained strident in their rhetoric. Months after one such hard-liner, Yahya Sinwar, became the local leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip (2017– ), he stated in a roundtable discussion with young Gazans: “Gone is the time in which Hamas discussed recognition of Israel. The discussion now is about when we will wipe out Israel.”

Folks are failing to understand the mission of Hamas. Also, the way the MSM is reporting the war is almost as if it is only Israel doing the attacking. Hamas of course is fighting back. According to Al Jazeera, their well-funded fighting force is estimated to be 35-40,000. (To put this in context, the standing army of Canada is 68,000.) Hamas has regularly been sending rockets into Israel since 2001.

Expand full comment

Annie, if US citizens were living in Israel, and having the power, Hamas would have been stepped on and eliminated a long time ago. We,the US would not have put up with it. Eventually,what occurred on 10-7, was bound to happen. And now everyone is shocked at the results.

And what happens after all this? Another group of psychology warped people will take Hamas place. Hopefully there will be a lull of a few years. Religion and real estate have sure been the reason for a lot of deaths. Being an atheist with some real estate, I am on the target list.

Expand full comment

Well, I’m not so sure of that. It’s not easy to tell who is a terrorist and who is not. Witness the Islamist terrorist attacks that have taken place on US soil.

Expand full comment

And, there are actually many Jewish Americans living in Israel.

Expand full comment

Yes! Okay, Article 6 of the Hamas Charter is not their top priority yet, but nudging them in that direction might help.

Let's ask Thaler and Sunstein on how to Nudge people on both sides to accept a better outcome.

"For Thaler and Sunstein, a nudge is “any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without [1] forbidding any options or [2] significantly changing their economic incentives."

Instead of paying Hamas terrorists to attack Israel maybe the default could be business contracts and currency transfers be between different cultures by default or suffer through a mountain of red-tape. Kind of like nudging people into 401K participation.

Say a Jew wants to build a house in Palestine. The default builders are not Jews as a Jewish builder costs X% more than other culture builders as they would be taxed X% and have more lengthy inspections and permits. Muslims would also be nudged not to use Muslim contractors. As an example.

Expand full comment

James, Diplomacy, the act of getting obstructionists to take knee without using a 1000 pound weight to the shoulder. While being a bit slower, 900 does just fine

Expand full comment

I’ll say it again, please everyone email the White House and tell President Biden to start a Fireside Chat reminiscent of FDR. He needs to get his message out and he is not doing so now. You can go on the White House site and repeat the request every day.

Expand full comment

As nice as it would be, there is no current mechanism available to President Biden to do so. TV and social media are fractured to the point of uselessness. When FDR did his chats. people had radios and newspapers and that was it. Now there are 500 TV channels, streaming services, numerous social media sites and a gazillion podcasts. It's a "brave new world" and it hurts that it has contributed to the breakdown of cohesion.

Expand full comment

MisTBlu, I get it but it’s worth a try and besides, these could be modernized to fit social media. I recognize that many of us are boomers. But there are innovative approaches that can be tried. To do nothing is a capitulation l

Expand full comment

You are both right!

I hear what Bill is saying and agree that the administration has been too quiet. But MisTBlu's point about the fracturing of "media" is well taken.

The solution? An all hands on deck blistering campaign by Biden, Harris, Buttigieg and every major player in the administration - on TikTok!

Fire away everyday with Republican failures to help Americans. You know my list, I post it all the time. But here goes again.

"We tried to help with feeding poor kids - but Republicans blocked us!" Cut to hungry child.

"We tried to help with child care - but Republicans blocked us!" Cut to frustrated Mom.

"We tried to help with college expenses - but the Republican packed Supreme Court blocked us!" Cut to Thomas in a big RV.

"We are trying to stop Russian aggression and slaughter in Ukraine - but Republicans blocked us! Is Poland next?" Cut to photos of Ukraine (use your imagination).

"We have asked Congress to come together and help us address the border problem, but Republicans have blocked us!" Cut to the desperate immigrants in a food line.

"We are fighting to make it easier and safer for ALL Americans to vote - but Republicans are making it harder!" Cut to a long line of voters waiting, waiting, waiting.

"We believe a woman's reproductive decisions should be hers - hers alone. But Republicans want to tell her what to do with her body!" Cut to a group of old white men facing off with a diverse group of young women.

Here's the thing. The voters that we desperately need and who are becoming disillusioned - don't watch TV news. They watch their phones - all day long. If something is on TikTok and is provocative it will become viral and be spread around the rest of the media landscape. We need to attack. There certainly is enough ammunition. Find people where they live - it's on their phones.

Expand full comment

Good idea about Tic Tock. Pete is there. Usually he talks about policy. Great idea about spreading the message.

Expand full comment

Friendly correction: Pete Buttigieg doesn't have a TikTok account. No member of the administration does as it has been banned by the White House. He is often featured in TikTok posts. He does have an Instagram account.

Expand full comment

He could use Instagram. Whatever would become viral enough - to be reposted on other apps and sites.

Expand full comment

Yes yes and yes!! And President Biden recently was in Hollywood with many celebrities for campaign donations. Have them speak out too. The Jan 6th committee had great sound bites professionally put together. Simple., clear and short.

Expand full comment

Do celebrity endorsements have any effect anymore? That said, Taylor Swift urging her fans to register to vote had a huge effect in every city where she performed. Alas, there's only one Taylor Swift.

Expand full comment

Because of the Chinese aspect of Tic Tok, I do not partake; however, I have found that good old Reels on Instagram can also pack a punch! Great Plan Bill!

Expand full comment

Replying to myself to alert you to this just out from Simon Rosenberg. If you don't get his substack, I highly recommend it!

https://www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/new-biden-democracy-ad-lets-watch

Here is the ad we have been hoping for.

https://youtu.be/opICiMkVhc4

Expand full comment

Those videos exist on social media as that landscape is so fractured, their reach is limited.

The White House, President Biden, Vice President Harris and various members of the cabinet are active on social media. This morning I woke up thinking that the problem isn't the message but the messenger. As effective as Biden has been as an administrator, it's a sad fact that he's not a good communicator. Also, the donation videos that he makes only serve to show how old he is.

Younger people can promote the successes of the Biden-Harris administration IF they have a critical mass of followers who can then pass along their messages. Politics Girl and Victor Shu show up in my feeds but I don't know how many people they reach across their platforms.

Expand full comment

Fox has been creative in their take over of our communications system. Surely we can out maneuver Rupert in some fashion.

Expand full comment

Did you notice the story about Hannity moving to Florida from New York?

Rejoice New Yorkers. Perhaps Fox News, WSJ and the New York Post will also relocate to red states.

Can't wait for the next defamation suit against FOX since this is the biggie $$$$ wise.

Expand full comment

All should move to HELL, along with Rupert and crews of vipers. Of course, DeSatan has made Florida hell, just like the evil trio in Texas has done that to us.

Expand full comment

I accidentally watch a couple of minutes of Fox like when I go to get my car serviced, etc. All they do is whine and make fun of Democrats. Maybe they do more, but I'm not willing to watch any more. I've blocked all of Murdoch's enterprises from my news feed.

But yes, they should move to HELL Jeri.

Expand full comment

Please read Joyce Vance piece from last night. It was eye opening.

Expand full comment

It does seem that most of us on this thread are oldies. I do wonder if there are any number of "youngsters" here.

Expand full comment

Harvey, there are a few and are acknowledged (celebrated!), tho one such insightful commenter has not weighed in here for sometime—miss his contributions. Hope all is OK & living his best life offline. I also treasure the wisdom and experience of those with more trips ‘round the sun than I.

Expand full comment

I get a notification from Facebook almost daily that the President is “live”. I think he is trying to do the social media equivalent of the fireside chat. I am perplexed that the message is not getting out.

Expand full comment

WH fb page is dominated by the anti Biden pro TFG rants

Expand full comment

The joys of free speech ;-(

Expand full comment

Have written once to both Biden and Harris. Will start a daily email to them.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

Yes, and people actually listened. Now that social media has taken over, we are at the whims of people like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg where money is the only driving factor. I just read the today's Civil Discourse post by Joyce Vance about how young people learn about our world. Someday very soon they will inherit all of this. The question is, how do we engage them to understand the evil that lives in the hearts of some of these people? Their future and our democracy depends on getting through to them!

Expand full comment

It helps to start them young. I took my son (now 43) to vote with me every time and he used to listen to NPR with me when I picked him up from school. It was what was on. Today he’s politically engaged.

Expand full comment

I agree and now listen to interesting stuff my son streams while on the treadmill. Also, talk with former exchange student who bring interesting perspective from other parts of the world. The Vance piece was very concerning.

Expand full comment

I remember having just the three networks. Educational tv from our university was a big deal and hard to access. The three networks presented the same facts. Today companies like Fox just flat out lie. Fox is a fact free zone. Why is that happening? MONEY! An Australian carpetbagger is helping tear apart the US so he can make money. But he has a gullible audience.

Expand full comment

True. Everyone operates within their own microcosm, as we do to a certain extent here. I doubt Fox would agree to simulcast with MSNBC even if ad revenue was guaranteed. The idea may appeal to old folks but would bypass huge swathes of would be voters.

Expand full comment

This! Read Joyce Vance’s substack today as she addresses this very subject. My grandchildren (13 and 8) here in the UK are better informed than many Americans. I talk to them about politics and world events because it’s so important

Expand full comment

Joyce Vance on not assuming that people know about current events when their social media algorithms do not include news about current events, so do our part to talk about it!

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/a-warning

Expand full comment

Thanks for providing the link Ellie. My daughter in 29 and clueless about national and world events. If I'm honest even local events.

Expand full comment

Ellie, thank you for this. Any of us who do the postcards and/or letters to voters (that I started doing thanks to you) need to know this, and also, when that time comes, WHAT to write when the voter might be totally ignorant? I am amazed that a 29 year old would not know who Rudy is!

IMHO the Democrats need to give more concise message than "saving democracy" because after reading this, I am not confident that all voters grasp what that means. I mean that seriously: if they don't care about voting or don't think their votes matter, are they even concerned that that right might be taken away?

Expand full comment

It was excellent. One of the comments mentioned Brexit, and the fact that many didn't know what they were voting for, until it happened.

Expand full comment

Another chump-type boondoggle

Expand full comment

Farage's masterpiece.

Expand full comment

Brexit was encouraged by Russia in order to divide and weaken the UK. I recall hearing citizens of the UK say at the time of this vote, “well, I voted for Brexit, but I didn’t really think it was going to pass.”

Expand full comment

Sad.

Expand full comment

I try, one will engage, the other tunes out.

Expand full comment

Lee, maybe your grandchildren should be educating young voters in the U.S.!

Expand full comment

Younger persons probably don't even have cable anymore. I'm nearly 50, and we have over the air TV, but never watch unless the Olympics are on NBC. We do stream. Perhaps the Whitehouse needs to post their Fireside Chats on YouTube! Google would be happy to have them for the advertising revenue it would raise.

Expand full comment

Maybe he should take a page from both Politics Girl and Beau of the Fifth Column. "President Joe" on TikTok and "Joe of the Oval Office" on YouTube.

Expand full comment

Love Politics Girl!, Ally House!

Expand full comment

Yes! YouTube! Perfect! That way nearly everyone has access and could be forewarned to watch live or told afterwards and still watch! Each one should be available on YouTube at least until the next one.

Expand full comment

No reason to take any of them down! It is not like Google doesn't have the storage for YouTube videos.

Expand full comment

With my tired eyes, I misread streaming services as screaming services (like some old friends try to point me to).

Expand full comment

Indeed that problem is too many voices. An announcement of a major address from the WH should get enough ears - maybe.

Expand full comment

A single major address would get network and some cable coverage but the fireside chats proposed by the OP would be relegated to C-Span with links on social media. It's a shame, really.

Expand full comment

Maybe Joe should follow Trump’s lead and just start saying crazy things and lie about virtually everything. To be sure I am being sarcastic but sadly it would likely work. The press continues to publish at least 10 articles about Trump to anything about Biden.

Expand full comment
Jan 4·edited Jan 4

Biden's every word is examined for signs of senility. If he says anything approaching "crazy" it's put down to that. It's not just that Trump makes for clickable content, it's that he has a strategy to "earn" free media. In 2016 he billions worth of free media. I didn't bother to look for 2020 but we know that he's running the same playbook in 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LE0.1HzB.22Tq4USF2kJS&hpgrp=ar-abar&smid=url-share

Expand full comment

Good point

Expand full comment

Fireside Substack! :-) Newsletters and podcasts. How about multiple posts a week, with themes (I love themes). For example: Mondays are for climate; Wednesdays for economy; Saturdays about children (education, safety, the future etc); and Sunday mini-State of the Union updates.

Expand full comment

I agree, Bill, thanks for the reminders — and would add that these emails should include that the issues of these chats need to be capsulized for social media, in memes and "Stories" for dissemination on sites like FB, IG, (holding my nose - X), TikTok, etc. Not that the Biden/Harris team doesn't know that part, but it's important to emphasize when we write.

Expand full comment

yes and 2 words for his campaign - Biden Delivers. Simple, easy, makes people question and think.

Expand full comment

Agreed, but maybe it should be VP Harris. I was up in the New England area and the saturation of ads for the primaries was about President Biden’s age and the border. Candidate Haley suggest having a coherency test and then failed to know that slavery was the reason for the Civil War.

As my friend suggested, shut down the border for just two days will show folks we can do it. I will add that we need to talk about it. Fox News is sure doing so.

Economy is back, the market is back, jobs are flowing, we just need to talk about the border. Fireside chat or a White House Substack.

Expand full comment

Actually, I think we need to stop talking about the border. We need to stop letting republicans determine the subjects of our national conversation. We (by we, I mean the media) need to be talking about the issues important to us: health care, reproductive rights, voting rights, Ukraine, Israel and diplomacy in general etc etc.

Expand full comment

In all due respect, every station is showing the crowds walking in, including MS-NBC and CNN. City mayors saying they are at their breaking point. Bus refusals. I volunteer for Table of Hope and there is not enough food to offer at times. As a lifetime dem, I'm concerned about the border and the safety of these people. I also volunteer at Jersey Battered Women Services. They too are hispanics with kids that don't speak English since they just came in.

And it appears no matter how much we show data, the republicans will spin the high cost of food, health care, reproductive rights, voting rights. I cannot write how many stupid things I have heard from people over the years managing a wire shop. And it is never from a respectable paper, it is from Fox and others showing images, along with TV political Ads.

We will not know the correct answer to all this, but we'll find out in Nov.

Take care, be safe.

Expand full comment

That’s my point, exactly. Every station is showing it, because we’ve allowed republicans to define the conversation. We could still focus on the border, but show the compassionate side, like you just did.

Expand full comment

Share📣 from the conservative, Libertarian Cato Institute

“ New Data Show Migrants Were More Likely to Be Released by Trump Than Biden”

https://www.cato.org/blog/new-data-show-migrants-were-more-likely-be-released-trump-biden

Expand full comment

See link to the last White House immigration proposal in January of 2021. It is soft on real control of the border. Focus is on training, more court resources. There has been no proposal since then.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/20/fact-sheet-president-biden-sends-immigration-bill-to-congress-as-part-of-his-commitment-to-modernize-our-immigration-system/

Expand full comment

Let’s focus on what we do now. December saw around 300,000 illegal border crossings- around the same number of people that live in Cincinnati. Certainly many, many asylum seekers were released. The border is overwhelmed.

Expand full comment

Kathy - "Share📣 from the conservative, Libertarian Cato Institute"

The Cato Institute is an American libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded as the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and Charles Koch.

"𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙, 𝑤𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝐼𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑅𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡-𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑖𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑. 𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑜’𝑠 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑒𝑠. 𝑂𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑅𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡-𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑤𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒. 𝑊𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝐻𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒." --MediaBiasFactCheck<dot>com

Expand full comment

I did! Thanks for the idea.

Expand full comment

Bill, you inspired me to write to the President yesterday about the fireside chat idea. (And several more topics that were on my mind). I had been thinking about writing for a while; your suggestion, your plea, caused me to take action. Thank you.

Expand full comment

No thank you. We must begin speaking up.

Expand full comment

Bill,

I have noticed a decrease in public exposure for Biden. Which, of course, comes at exactly the wrong time.

Expand full comment

Bill, I too have called for a fireside chat alla FDR. The GOP's antics are so transparent that to fall for it suggests gullibility verging on stupidity. It does seem that the Republican's nonsense is aimed at their base who they know will believe any BS. The question is why? Stupidity? Confirmation bias? BS they need to hear to justify their fears and hatred.

Expand full comment

Agree. Remember Nuyte’s “Contract with America” sounded good until you opened the contract. Today the border is totally broken but our side says no it isn’t. But we can possibly lose on this one issue alone. If you didn’t know it by now, people are angry. Common sense would dictate closing as I said before but received criticism for it. Such is politics. I don’t know why mayors from cities in which buses loaded with illegals (and they are illegal, btw), why the buses were never confiscated. If they were, bus companies would think twice about using them.

Expand full comment

Bill, the Biden Team opens it 2024 campaign messaging on Friday, January 6. I am sure you can predict the Topic.

The J6 campaign speech will be at ... wait for it: ...Valley Forge.

More than sitting near a Fireside 🔥 was needed at Valley Forge.

Expand full comment

Great idea, Bill. It can be like Nixon and his Checkers speech. Biden and one of his rescue dogs, by the fireplace, with the growling of the dog and the shredding of human flesh with the dog biting the secret service guys. Talk about great television. Millions of hits on YouTube. Tucker Carlson would have a Stroke.

Expand full comment

The WH fb page is nothing more than rants by the pro tRump crowd

Expand full comment

Thank you for this suggestion and the site. I read it yesterday. Done and dusted.

Expand full comment

'Lots of pieces moving around the board on this second day of January 2024.' (Letter)

Is that not prose poetry at this time of what, uncertainty mixed with woe? Today's letter

is full of events, questions and threats. Our presidential election is crucial and not alone

in its importance.

The following is a long excerpt by Ishaan Tharoor with Mikhail Klimentov, in Washington Post's newsletter, Today's WorldView, as appears today.

'More than 60 countries, with some 4 billion people, are set to stage national elections in 2024. That means roughly half the planet could go to the polls in what could be the greatest rolling spectacle of democracy in human history.'

'We might not see this number of elections matched until 2048, when the world’s political landscape could look considerably different. The “third wave” of democracy — the steady global expansion of democratic governments that surged through the end of the Cold War — has ebbed over the past decade. Elections are still staged, but the underlying political culture seems to be shifting worldwide.'

'In society after society, illiberal values and politicians who embrace them are gaining ground. Numerous elected governments seem bent on undermining core tenets of the democratic project, from the freedom of the press to the independence of institutions such as the judiciary to the ability of opposition parties to fairly compete against the ruling establishment.'

'According to Freedom House, a Washington think tank that monitors the health of democracies, global freedom declined for the 17th consecutive year in 2023. The organization’s annual report cites a wave of coups that ousted elected leaders in Africa and increasing threats to the rights of journalists in dozens of countries. Separately, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, a Sweden-based intergovernmental watchdog, said in its annual report that “across every region of the world, democracy has continued to contract” and that 2022 marked a sixth consecutive year in which more countries experienced net democratic declines than improvements, per its data. It projects that 2023 will be no better.'

'The news this year could be more drastic still. The outcomes of pivotal elections in the United States — the world’s oldest democracy — and India — the world’s largest — may underscore a deepening public appetite for norm-bending strongman rule. In their shadow, elections from Mexico to the European Union to Bangladesh may each offer their own showcase of the growing traction of nationalist, authoritarian politics. “We’re electing illiberal leaders democratically,” Maria Ressa, a prominent journalist and Nobel laureate from the Philippines, said during an address to the National Press Club in Washington in September. “We will know whether democracy lives or dies by the end of 2024.” (WAPO)

Expand full comment

I think that in some highly visible way there needs to be a more focused national conversation of what voting means; why we do, why it is necessary to our way of life, and what it means to our society and the lives of individuals if we muck it up. If each and every one of us does not make a responsible effort to get it right, who will? With a share of power comes a share of responsibility. It just checking off boxes.

Expand full comment

Perhaps we should teach civics and history to our children. I have a big fat resentment about all the stuff I was taught in history class in K-12. You know like the Pilgrims partying with the Indians at Thanksgiving.

Expand full comment

We have a duty to be accurate. My elementary school history was mostly myth, either heavily slanted or just plain made up, I was taught that Columbus was the very first person to realize the earth is round, Washington and the cherry tree, the "first Thanksgiving" which was more BS than true, how Pocahontas rescued John Smith from certain death, and American Exceptionalism in all things. The one thing that I was taught that stuck was the egalitarian philosophy of Lincoln. Lincoln the man was oversimplified of course, and there were one or two apocryphal quotations, but Lincoln came the closest, in my opinion, to articulating and applying the core principles of a just democracy for others to follow. That was a presented in a focused way because of the "Lincoln's Birthday", which has since been submerged into socially meaningless "President's Day".

As far as civics, we got some, but not nearly enough for a meaningful learners permit for driving the country.

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

JL,

Voting is what I do to put in place a "representative" who then collects "lobby" payments from special interests to represent that lobby.

Just to provide a clear definition of what voting does in 'Murca.

Expand full comment

That is not a serviceable definition of "voting" in anything worthy of being called a "republic". That is the definition of "political corruption". That's exactly why a serious reckoning and conversation waaaaay overdue. The "Gilded Age" was also marked by plutocratic corruption, and we beat some of the worst of it back. It's our democracy to lose if we remain indifferent.

Expand full comment

The cheaters have been busy stacking the deck, time’s a wasting

Expand full comment

When I moan about how one orange bufoon can cause so much chaos I am reminded of the Koch Bros plan beginning in the 70's I think. I feel like we were asleep at the wheel. I certainly was until I read Dark Money by Jane Mayer. We are trying to fight a group that has been actively moving their ball closer to their goals for years.

Expand full comment

I missed them, but I caught up with Nixon and Reagan, who made it clear what his goal was, in spite of the "good ole boys" blather to the devoted, including Reagan Dems. BTW, Koch goal is to amend the constitution and they have made headway getting states on board. Scary, it may need some amendments, but God help us if Charles is in control.

Expand full comment

Jeri, I think it will be crucial that we not see "them" as the "Cheaters" because "they" are the capitalists who simply seek to make ever more money while we buy what they are selling whether it be cars, RVs, boats, news, easily-ordered and promptly-delivered products on-line, sleek and powerful phones, computers & watches or the very computer searches and and underlying algorithms which drive them (and us) toward what we come to see as "facts." To a very real extent, "they" are us! We need to ask ourselves how we can best harness us toward a more coherent future?

Expand full comment

Thanks for illuminating some other pieces moving Fern. "Lots of pieces moving around the board on this second day of January 2024."

Expand full comment

D4N, a dear friend said to me recently that he, '...will worry less and drink more.' I thought of that line as I read the piece by Ishaan Tharoor about the elections around the world. My question to myself is drink what? I'll think about that.

Expand full comment

Fern,

I highly recommend Johnnie Walker Red. The drink of choice in trailer parks all over the USA!

Expand full comment

Naw, a good Irish whiskey.

Expand full comment

You would, in lacking of care and conscience.

Expand full comment

Fern, it might be a stretch for me to be around in 2048, i would be 93 years old then. However, my Mother did live to be 90 years old.

Expand full comment

John, stretching is good; go for it!

Expand full comment

Thank you, FERN.

Expand full comment

She’s right, of course. It’s Pilates that keeps me going to 90 (and beyond?).

Expand full comment

My money's on you!

Expand full comment

My Grandma Salome, at 100, was still leading a parade of nursing home residents with walkers around the halls every morning! But still voting for whomever her priest told her to vote for.

Expand full comment

P.S. Yes, Salome was Catholic. Her father, however, wore a yarmulke, and had the Star of David on his headstone. We all found out at her 100th birthday party that it wasn't just because "great grandpa loved beanies."

Expand full comment

Pope Francis May stretch Catholicism a bit more and even get the Curia in check. Watching and waiting.

Expand full comment

Love Pope Saint Francis!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Fern. The phrase "underscore a deepening public appetite for norm-bending strongman rule" is both accurate and awful.

Expand full comment

It was hard to "like" your post Fern, however, it seems critical that we see and understand this trend as having sources and contributors. I am struck by the comparison of the contents of earlier posts in this Comment section with yours and led pretty directly to the conclusion that the "Balkanization" or splintering of our information sources, especially those driven by the algorithms of capitalism ("more clicks means more money"). This splintering has led away from any common body of facts and to increasingly splintered perceptions of the world around us and others who don't look, act, or talk like us making it much easier for authoritarians to spew whatever "facts," "factoids," or innuendos serve their pitch best. Then their adherents can be fed whatever continues to serve their world view, which is to say whatever serves themselves best.

Expand full comment

Sometimes overstating and intellectualizing your point comes up as incomprehensible, if you know what I mean and understand that you may not. Cheers!

Expand full comment

Yeah, Fern, I often use too many words in trying to make a point. I'll work on slimming it down.

Expand full comment

Simple and clear is an uncomplicated way of reaching your goal.

Expand full comment

GULP: “We’re electing illiberal leaders democratically,” Maria Ressa, a prominent journalist and Nobel laureate from the Philippines, said during an address to the National Press Club in Washington in September. “We will know whether democracy lives or dies by the end of 2024.” (WAPO).

Expand full comment

Does anyone else believe as I do that unacknowledged fear of climate change (given the obvious results in many countries) contributes to the desire for a “god” to keep Mother Nature in check? That’s so we don’t have to face the enormous changes necessary for our continuing survival on planet Earth.

Expand full comment

So let me get this straight. The US is sending money and selling arms to Israel, which will be used to murder Palestinians. And the US is sending money for humanitarian aid to Palestine so that we can help the victims of Israeli attacks. The world is beyond crazy.

Expand full comment

And on top of that there are plans to rebuild Gaza at $3billion a year for ten years, but Netyahu says the destruction/massacre will go on for many more months, senselessly destroying housing, schools, hospitals, mosques, churches, and God knows what else. 🤯

Expand full comment

Bibi and his right wing must go. As I understand it the current administration has a 15% approval rate.

Expand full comment

Yet they voted the bastards in. Half a million illegal settlers in the West Bank...

Expand full comment

All Fundamentalist Americans. Kach Krazies

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

Please elaborate. I've no knowledge of this regarding Fundamentalist Americans settling the West Bank. Speaking in good faith and not sarcastically!

Expand full comment

The followers of the crazy Rabbi, Meir Kahane. One of them was the nutcase "Doctor" Goldman, the mass murderer in the Cave of ther Patriarchs 30 years ago next month. The looney Rabbi founded "Kach", which was declared illegal, but which is the party that most represents the extremists, like the convicted dometic terrorist, Itamir Ben Gvir, the "Minister of Just Us" in Nitwit's "government.

Expand full comment

Just like "they" voted the GOP into control of Congress.

Expand full comment

Israel's war has cost the Palestinians mortally, the US monetarily and Biden votes, particularly, by young voters, and morally, Morally!, what's that?

What will the cost be to Israel?

Expand full comment

The cost will be higher than the Holocaust. Jews have been unjustly vilified for centuries, now historical enemies will have cause to vilify with self-righteous indignation

Expand full comment

That is not a fair statement.

Expand full comment

Well said Fern. It’s nice being up with the big kids, maybe breaking my leg and not being able to sleep has an upside!

Expand full comment
Jan 3·edited Jan 3

A leg I think is a bigger deal then my left wrist falling on ice a couple of years back! Then I also broke my ribs falling on ice. I now have spikes on my boots for walking Bear (our dog) and snow blowing.

Hope you recover soon and have help from friends and family!

Expand full comment

Time to move to a warmer clime, Matt.

Expand full comment

Ouch!

Expand full comment

Gail, that's not good news concerning your leg. I hope your healing is easy and that a full recovery is in store. (I know, not soon enough!)

Expand full comment

Thanks, my husband has been away since before it happened but returns tomorrow night. Feeling pretty powerful for handling it on my own. Onward and upward!

Expand full comment

‼️ I had a PRP procedure on my leg yesterday and it is quite sore today. Propped up in recliner with cup of coffee and fireplace working! Quick recovery to you!

Expand full comment

Thank you so much MLM! Hope you have a speedy recovery!❤️‍🩹

Expand full comment

Gail, hoping that you heal quickly.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Mary!

Expand full comment

Yikes!! Heal quickly. I hope it is not the only upside of your misadventure.

Expand full comment

Thanks Ally. The EMTs were wonderful, but I was so embarrassed! At my request they arrived with no sirens to wake the neighbors lol.

Expand full comment