Interesting. But wouldn't that be "regressive" in terms of hurting the working poor more proportionately than the affluent? And wouldn't that require multiple levels of a new bureaucracy? Not sure.
Also, I am a huge fan of funding education on a statewide basis. The current zip code funding schools in MA creates enormous inequities.
Interesting. But wouldn't that be "regressive" in terms of hurting the working poor more proportionately than the affluent? And wouldn't that require multiple levels of a new bureaucracy? Not sure.
Also, I am a huge fan of funding education on a statewide basis. The current zip code funding schools in MA creates enormous inequities.
We used to fund schools here in Oregon with a property tax. I had students in the library crying because it did not pass and so no school. Now the state funds it and tries to make it more equitable. Still there are lots of problems.
Interesting. But wouldn't that be "regressive" in terms of hurting the working poor more proportionately than the affluent? And wouldn't that require multiple levels of a new bureaucracy? Not sure.
Also, I am a huge fan of funding education on a statewide basis. The current zip code funding schools in MA creates enormous inequities.
We used to fund schools here in Oregon with a property tax. I had students in the library crying because it did not pass and so no school. Now the state funds it and tries to make it more equitable. Still there are lots of problems.
Totally agree