She has a much longer history of voting against. Many, many votes. And many of those were blatantly against the people, similar to voting rights.
She was right to vote as she did in your examples, and good for her, but those were only a two (or even a few) and one must also note that those were "safe" votes.
I would say she's one of the…
She has a much longer history of voting against. Many, many votes. And many of those were blatantly against the people, similar to voting rights.
She was right to vote as she did in your examples, and good for her, but those were only a two (or even a few) and one must also note that those were "safe" votes.
I would say she's one of the good republicans - the ones that believe in bipartisanship, etc and truly believe in democracy - but her votes just this year alone are in lock-step with those that wish to end our current form of government, and so I can't say that. That cannot be said of any current R. Senator.
She has a much longer history of voting against. Many, many votes. And many of those were blatantly against the people, similar to voting rights.
She was right to vote as she did in your examples, and good for her, but those were only a two (or even a few) and one must also note that those were "safe" votes.
I would say she's one of the good republicans - the ones that believe in bipartisanship, etc and truly believe in democracy - but her votes just this year alone are in lock-step with those that wish to end our current form of government, and so I can't say that. That cannot be said of any current R. Senator.