Let's not get misty-eyed about this. Mike Rounds also said he'd vote for the Republican nominee for President, which right now could be Trump. You can't have it both ways.
Let's not get misty-eyed about this. Mike Rounds also said he'd vote for the Republican nominee for President, which right now could be Trump. You can't have it both ways.
Arthur, Did you consider Mike Rounds, practically alone, in the toxic ferment of the USA coming forward to tell the truth? Did he do the country some good? Might he have opened a crack for a few more to walk through? Perhaps, he spurred some minds to question the lie. Did you make a negative remark as many did when learning that Dan Quayle advised Mike Pence to conduct himself according to the Constitution? As you were a lawyer, I hoped that you wouldn't find this series of questions annoying. Lastly, would you have appreciated Mike Rounds more if he was your client? He is a person with faults, perhaps, not an admirable politician, and, yet, Mike Rounds did a very good deed.
I did, but as Michael Steele noted two nights ago, Mike Rounds hemmed, hawed, shucked and jived over whether Rounds would vote for Trump in the next Republican primary. Rounds wants to have it both ways, suddenly being seen as a courageous truth teller with people who don't necessarily follow this stuff closely, and trying to remain on Trump's good side by suggesting strongly that if Trump's the Republican nominee, Rounds would still vote for him. Rounds is a hypocrite, like all of his brethren in Congress and in Statehouses elsewhere. He's like the drunk, claiming he's reformed, but with a bottle of hooch in his side pocket. These people are completely untrustworthy, and liars to boot.
I see, Michael Steele, expressed your judgment to a T. He is a likeable pol. Steele doesn't usually proclaim opinions in a high and mighty way and may have refrained from that in this case, too; maybe a bit of contempt for Rounds was mixed in.
A well-earned contempt, I would say. Michael Steele is a plain spoken guy who calls it as he sees it. And I generally agree with him, because he speaks to my concerns, and we share common values.
Let's not get misty-eyed about this. Mike Rounds also said he'd vote for the Republican nominee for President, which right now could be Trump. You can't have it both ways.
Arthur, Did you consider Mike Rounds, practically alone, in the toxic ferment of the USA coming forward to tell the truth? Did he do the country some good? Might he have opened a crack for a few more to walk through? Perhaps, he spurred some minds to question the lie. Did you make a negative remark as many did when learning that Dan Quayle advised Mike Pence to conduct himself according to the Constitution? As you were a lawyer, I hoped that you wouldn't find this series of questions annoying. Lastly, would you have appreciated Mike Rounds more if he was your client? He is a person with faults, perhaps, not an admirable politician, and, yet, Mike Rounds did a very good deed.
I did, but as Michael Steele noted two nights ago, Mike Rounds hemmed, hawed, shucked and jived over whether Rounds would vote for Trump in the next Republican primary. Rounds wants to have it both ways, suddenly being seen as a courageous truth teller with people who don't necessarily follow this stuff closely, and trying to remain on Trump's good side by suggesting strongly that if Trump's the Republican nominee, Rounds would still vote for him. Rounds is a hypocrite, like all of his brethren in Congress and in Statehouses elsewhere. He's like the drunk, claiming he's reformed, but with a bottle of hooch in his side pocket. These people are completely untrustworthy, and liars to boot.
I see, Michael Steele, expressed your judgment to a T. He is a likeable pol. Steele doesn't usually proclaim opinions in a high and mighty way and may have refrained from that in this case, too; maybe a bit of contempt for Rounds was mixed in.
A well-earned contempt, I would say. Michael Steele is a plain spoken guy who calls it as he sees it. And I generally agree with him, because he speaks to my concerns, and we share common values.