909 Comments
User's avatar
Rosemary Siipola's avatar

This is not going to end well for Trump and Musk. We’re going to go through hell and back, but I believe we will keep our democracy. We have no choice.

Expand full comment
Nancy McNeal's avatar

I pray you are right about how this ends, Rosemary. I have no idea how the sane Republicans in Congress can watch this unfolding and do nothing.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Nancy, the late Warren Rudman, senator from my home state of NH, warned about this in his memoirs years ago:

"The Republican Party is making a terrible mistake if it appears to ally itself with the Christian right. There are some fine, sincere people in its ranks, but there are also enough anti-abortion zealots, would-be censors, homophobes, bigots and latter-day Elmer Gantrys to discredit any party that is unwise enough to embrace such a group."

He was prescient.

Expand full comment
Heather Elowe's avatar

I’ve told Sen Susan Collins how badly she has put herself to shame in the light of her predecessor from ME, Margaret Chase Smith, who also called out Senate and McCarthy in her Declaration of Conscience (1950

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

Heather Cox: You write well on the issues and the motivations of the trump mafia which exist only for self-aggrandizement and wealth. We know this. He currently enjoys 53% or more approval rating which is atrocious. If we are to succeed in vindicating ourselves from this evil, we must adopt some of the popular issues in fact that he supports. Search your souls. Don’t get locked in partisan issues that are destined to fail. Intelligent folks learn to adopt. We can too. But my hunch is that we will stay locked in self-righteousness and fight losing battles.

Expand full comment
Jen Andrews's avatar

CBS is being sued by the orange fucktard, like everyone else he thinks is mean to him.

Ya think maybe their numbers are bullshit ?

Expand full comment
Cece Siino's avatar

was just thinking the same thing... you cannot trust the polls, especially if they say 53% approve....

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Jen, I thought CBS caved and settled by offering him $15 million.

Expand full comment
Rachel Simon's avatar

Dont know where you get your facts Bill.

X% Approval Ratings . com??

Expand full comment
Miselle's avatar

I believe I heard that statistic yesterday on the Face The Nation broadcast, saying it was a CBS (or CNN?) poll?

I was so upset by the first 2 minutes of it, I had to turn it off.

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

Bill makes things up to get attention. He thrives on being contrary. Much like the Orange One.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

I don’t recall but I do not suscribe to X. That was deactivated a while ago.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

I find these polls very questionable.

Expand full comment
Donald Twaddle's avatar

"...........we must adopt some of the popular issues in fact that he supports." Would you be helpful enough to provide us a list? All this gish galloping makes it difficult to even know where to start.

Expand full comment
Carol Fletez's avatar

No we cannot give one inch not one millimeter to Trump. That's what the GOP has been doing on a total slippery slope since Nixon. They're all crooks by virtue of giving in at all. Never.

This STOPS NOW

Expand full comment
AnnaKuz's avatar

Those 53%-ers only listen/read the orange dough nut's sanctioned information/media

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

BS

Expand full comment
Gjay15's avatar

Margaret Chase Smith. God love her.

Expand full comment
Solange Kellermann's avatar

Susan I'm Concerned Collins? She'll never speak up.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Doug, whether you call them, "the Christian Right, white Christian Nationalists, Evangelicals", they are all greedy Fascists that think that Trump and Musk will shower them with wealth.

We need to call them out in the churches across America, asking why they aren't tithing as the Bible COMMANDS them to do many many times. If Musk and Trump alone donated 10% of their actual annual haul, there would be no hungry or homeless people in the US. the Bible is very specific about how to donate your 10%. Churches need to publish their lists of donors.

The Republicans also REFUSE to raise the minimum wage. While the Waltons and the Bezos get richer and richer, they fight to keep their workers from unionizing.

Harlan Crowe is willing to give away free trips and write off loans to the Supremes but does he tithe?

All these hypocritical so-called Christians do is take, take, take and fuck over anyone they can to obtain more wealth than 1000 families spend in a lifetime.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

As a recovering evangelical, I can respond with considerable knowledge about ... What. Evangelicals. Want.

There is a strain of evangelicals who believe in The Prosperity Gospel, which claims that the more a believer "invests in God's work," the more likely they will become rich. This is the gospel offered by televangelists for obvious reasons. Paula White, Donald's new faith guru, is a leading proponent of Prosperity Gospel, again, for obvious reasons.

It should be noted that Prosperity Gospel proponents always build a back door into their scheme: If the faithful "give sacrificially" and don't become wealthy, it's because "there's unconfessed sin in their lives."

There are many who fall for this scam, but they are a minority of evangelicals.

Most evangelicals imagine that they have been "persecuted" because of their faith* and they want revenge. Revenge, of course, is sin, so they couch their desire for retribution in more "spiritual" terms. They want this "christian nation to turn back to God and be led by leaders who follow biblical principles." This is just preachy-talk encoded to mask their intention to ram their personal list of "should-nots and must-nots" down everybody else's throats and force them to live under the same repression. The desire of evangelicals is power and control.

*When you are taught from birth that your way is the only right way, "because God said so," any disagreement you encounter is interpreted as persecution.

Expand full comment
Anne Marie's avatar

Dale, Great post. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Mary McGee Heins's avatar

Thanks, Dale. Yours is a fair statement about evangelicals, IMO. They are good at couching their real intentions or motives in what we called "religious speak." (I lived 10 years in a Catholic evangelical community like Amy Coney Barret's.)I never fell for the religious speak bantered about by some in the community -- maybe I examined my motives a little deeper than they did. Yes, so much religious speak!

Expand full comment
Jen Andrews's avatar

Religion is about power. Corrupt.

Look at all the magnificent churches in Europe, built by the blood of peasants.

Nowadays they build them with far less grandeur. Except the megacurches, those are still monuments to the ego of man.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Jen, I agree about The corrupting power of religion, but I disagree about European cathedrals. I've been an atheist/agnost for over 50 years, but I marvel at the architecture of cathedrals. I've only seen them in France and England, where I visited them at every opportunity.

Have you ever read Ken Follett's trilogy about the building of a cathedral, starting with The Pillars of the Earth? It's a fascinating fictional account that speaks of vision, faith, community, and greed.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Jen, I disagree just a smidge. Religion – even "good" religion – is overwhelmingly about control. Granted, evangelicals are currently seeking power, but the end-game is control. Having power alone just means the powerful get to do whatever they want, which typically involves satisfying their own selfish urges. By contrast, christo-fascists want power so they can force you and me to do what they consider to be right and not do what they believe is wrong.

Regarding religious architecture, I'll go along with "corrupt," as long as we define it as "contamination." By that, I mean there are mixed motivations behind building grand religious structures; some are vulgar and some are noble. True, many build cathedrals as monuments to themselves or their wealth or architectural prowess, or some other self-aggrandizement. But many of the faithful willingly contribute to these elaborate projects as acts of devotion or with the hope that worshipers will be inspired to think lofty thoughts, or some other altruistic motivation.

Expand full comment
Mary McGee Heins's avatar

In my experience in different churches, Jen, there are many sincere Christians who really do live the gospel of loving your neighbor in service and sacrifice. I trust you know that too.

Expand full comment
alma s ekdahl's avatar

I heard David French on a podcast say "White evangelical Christians voted for t.rump 82% to 17%. Everyone else 58% against t.rump to 40% for, so he is the white evangelical "Christian" president...they own him." And they are disgracing Christianity.

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

White “Christian” nationalism is not a religious movement. It is using religion as a cover for white supremacy. These people are terrorists.

Expand full comment
rick walsh's avatar

This whole thing, in the name of "Christianity" or what ever Tump wants to call it , really has nothing to do with Christians, to me its the same as watch my right hand while I steal with my left.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Might I suggest that when recommending books, you link to any outlet other than Amazon? Bezos the Coward doesn't need our money.

Expand full comment
Jen Andrews's avatar

If there's a small locally owned shop near you order from

Expand full comment
Anne Marie's avatar

Or go to your public library! Jen, What a gift to us all!

Expand full comment
Ed Nuhfer's avatar

Dale, most surely I concur with your sentiment.

I ended up choosing that particular link for the review of the contents at that link. The title alone isn't a good indicator of the content, and I'm confident Bezos never wrote the summary review.

Incidentally, I bought my copy used from an independent book store. The option exists to do that, even through Amazon. Often the best buys there are from Habitat for Humanity or Goodwill outlets.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Ed, I hope you didn't interpret my suggestion as criticism, because that wasn't the reason for my comment. I recommend books on various forums. When I can't find a title with reviews on another site, I'll use the Amazon link with an advisory to buy local or at another online outlet.

I know you're one of the "good guys" or you wouldn't be here.

Expand full comment
Todd Settimo's avatar

I also suggest bookshop.org. It’s a B corp that helps to support local bookstores.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Britton's avatar

Thank you for the title …. I just ordered it!

Expand full comment
Jane's avatar

Fears of aSetting Sun by Rasmussen…just ordered paperback from local bookstore also…then will place in Little Library in my neighborhood. First Amendment must be protected!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Britton's avatar

Excellent idea!

Expand full comment
Frank Loomer's avatar

Putting it mildly, Doug, he was so right. Trump is taking the Republican Train on a race which is burning its tracks behind it. If not a political demolition, are we looking at the early steps to outright political supremacy? I am truly wondering.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Fascism is the goal.

Expand full comment
Tim Berry's avatar

I voted for Warren Rudman in the process of becoming more progressive than NH's current crop of Democrats and I am still an undeclared voter.

Expand full comment
Steve Abbott's avatar

I admired the way he civilly debated and worked with MA Senator Paul Tsongas on many issues, especially deficit spending.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Tim, although I never voted for him, I had a great deal of respect for the man. I met him when he was beginning his candidacy for the Senate -- he was hitting my wife's family up for money in the late-1970s down in Florida, where my in-laws had a 2nd home and we were visiting.

He lived in our town, and I did some work for him and his wife at their home.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

So did Barry Goldwater.

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

Barry Goldwater

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Doug, don’t forget Barry Goldwater, a true conservative, on the christians’ involvement in politics way back when; https://www.azquotes.com/quote/602892

Expand full comment
Helen Stajninger's avatar

Boy was he ever prescient Doug

Expand full comment
LetMe_BeClear's avatar

I agree. I started reading about the rise of the Religious Right in the mid 80’s along with its desire to overturn our Democracy for a Theocracy. It seemed that most of the media never

Expand full comment
Anne Marie's avatar

Doug, Christian Nationalist is an oxymoron! Christian means a follower of the teachings of Christ, i.e feed the hungry, clothe the poor, take care of the sick. No adjective after the word Christian is needed. Their term is a bait and switch!

Expand full comment
Rosemary Siipola's avatar

They are all cowards and will not rise to the occasion. This is the culmination of decades of work to tear this country apart. They can’t win without striking fear. The jig is up. Let’s go!

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

The judges may be!

Elon Musk: “A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!”

"… JD Vance: “If a judge tried to tell a General how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the Attorney General in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal. Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power."

If I were the judge I'd enter an order to show cause why they are not in contempt.

Expand full comment
Jean(Muriel)'s avatar

Let’s go Rosemary. I am 78 and have always voted to have guns highly regulated in this country. My father taught me early on about the “right to bear arms” was to form a “militia”, not to give every citizen a gun to wield as a fear laser. Guns have one purpose :to kill!

If the traitors in our government think they are going to win through terror and lies…… they best get under their beds. How dare we all accept the mafia mentality of uneducated and seriously angry thugs . The one major thing we must do is make every ugly lie and illegal attempt at stealing our money( taxes) we pay, they don’t ,into huge signs showing every state and who represents them. out on the stage of the world. Every last one of the slimy creepy Heritage foundation members made public every day. Also, every lie blown - into huge screens with how they vote. Every state: Congress members and how they vote!

Resist! Support the real lawyers. Demand the impeachment of SCOTUS maga members!

This can be done. People have to have the truth about their lives.

We cannot be passive just to feel good. That is the recipe for failure of freedom.

Expand full comment
Joanne Filipo's avatar

They also can't win without cheating!

Expand full comment
lin•'s avatar

Sane Republicans in Congress?

No. Through their united vote for Vought, they've all signed on to the game of 'whoever's craziest wins.'

Expand full comment
James Burnham's avatar

Republicans prove every day that they are 'good Germans'. In other words, they are Nazis. That cannot be denied. Their cowardice must never be forgotten.

Expand full comment
bruce klassen's avatar

Puleeeese, James. Today's Germans are overwhelmingly Pacifists, Democratic and jealously guard the 'rule of Law'. If republicans prove anything, it is that they are "bad Americans". Good Germans "remember their history" when many of the American ignorant don't, or deny the facts.

Expand full comment
MisTBlu's avatar

It was "good Germans" who allowed Hitler and his coterie of toadies and thugs to do all they did. It was also the industrialists who turned their factories to producing the machinery of war. The parallels aren't exact but they are too close for my comfort.

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

Seems you haven't been in Germany in a while - the AfD, the modern Nazis are second largest party, so there seems to be quite a bit of nostalgia to being the "good old times" back. The Germans go right, the French go left. The Italians also gave fascism another go - looking grim all over the West.

Expand full comment
Heather Elowe's avatar

And guess who’s behind the right wing movement? The same adversaries who have co-opted our elections and MSM through disinformation.

Expand full comment
Joan Ehrlich, NYC, UWS's avatar

Isn't Musk also backing the AfD??

Expand full comment
Ed Nuhfer's avatar

A top hit in 20 years, with some substitute people and places. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmhgcC5dYkE

Expand full comment
James Burnham's avatar

Bruce, there are plenty of fascists in Germany today, and Democratic Socialists, too. But the term “good German” refers to the Nazi era. Once the full horror of the holocaust became known, Germans who acquiesced to Hitler’s rule sought cover by saying they just followed the law and had no idea that all those bad things were happening (when, of course, most of them were perfectly aware — consider the racial laws that grew year after year in the 30’s, where was the outrage?) In the case of today’s Republicans, it is far worse. They are conciously and publicly witnessing the takeover of the United States government by lawless sociopaths, led by two messianic narcissists, using the same methods that Hitler did. They are cowering in fear for their lives (as has been publicized recently) and allowing atrocities to be committed to our system putting the whole world at incalculable risk. Keep watching.

Expand full comment
Harvey Kravetz's avatar

'good Germans' where the Germans who stayed silent while their neighbors were sent to the gas chambers. Not present day Germans.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

bruce, with the "good Germans" in quotes, I read that as the Germans in Nazi Germany who did nothing.

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

The “Lost Cause” is proof of America’s failure to hold treasonous people accountable.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

“MUNICH, Germany (AP) — More than 200,000 protesters rallied in Munich, Germany, on Saturday against far-right extremism ahead of the country’s general election.”

https://apnews.com/article/germany-munich-election-afd-protests-29cdd1441e670a9f13394d2a44f035a5

Expand full comment
samani's avatar

Thank you Kathy! I just read the apnews article, and felt my heart lift with a modicum of joy; additionally & once again Heather’s clarity added much needed info for me. I feel a deep sense of shame about how destructive our present cowardly ‘leaders’ appear/are to the rest of our former allies. A small group of us, my neighbors and friends plan on writing a letter to each of them about how a majority of us feel with more included obviously. A sort of Letter to The World 🌏

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

They are the ‘COMPLICIT’

Expand full comment
Jan Dorsett's avatar

Anne Applebaum wrote a prescient article about this in 2020.

Expand full comment
LetMe_BeClear's avatar

Many Republicans want to mix Religion and government so it doesn’t surprise me that they voted for this Christian Nationalist. Newt Gingrich made Democrats “the enemy” back in the 80’s and the Republicans have united and created obstacles to governance ever since. I think their central mission is to subjugate women, again, as well as make the ultra-wealthy, wealthier.

Expand full comment
John LeBaron's avatar

I hope for the same thing, Nancy, but I wonder, is there a sane Republican left in Congress? Maybe a handful but those good congressional denizens seem to have voluntarily deposited their family jewels into the pockets of the grifting charlatans.

Expand full comment
John Jennrich's avatar

The term "sane Republican" is an oxymoron.

Expand full comment
Barbara Keating's avatar

Emphasis, John, on “moron”!!!!

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

If they’re sane and refuse to kowtow to Trump, they are mocked as RINOS and find themselves primaried out of office and defeated.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

I've been asking talking heads to interview Mike Turner, other House Republicans that support Ukraine. .

Elon Musk’s Enemy, USAID, Was Investigating Starlink’s Contracts in Ukraine.

"The Lever reported Tuesday that USAID’s inspector general was in the process of investigating its own public-private partnership between Musk’s Starlink and the Ukrainian government at the time that the billionaire’s DOGE crippled the agency. Publicly available information about that probe is still online. An announcement from last May reads: “The USAID Office of Inspector General, Inspections and Evaluations Division, is initiating an inspection of USAID’s oversight of Starlink satellite terminals provided to the Government of Ukraine. Our objectives are to determine how (1) the Government of Ukraine used the USAID-provided Starlink terminals, and (2) USAID monitored the Government of Ukraine’s use of USAID-provided Starlink terminals.”

"Musk has called the agency “evil” and a “criminal organization,” though the fact that USAID was investigating the Starlink activities may suggest ulterior motivations for the billionaire’s vitriol. It’s unclear what the Starlink probe’s status is right now."

Republican Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio was removed from his position atop the powerful House Intelligence Committee, telling CBS News that House Speaker Mike Johnson fired him, citing "concerns from Mar-a-Lago."

Also interview other House Repunlicans like Brian Fitzpatrick, and members of the Foreign Affairs Committee, like my rep, Elvira Salazar.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Some of them are scared to death. There have been numerous reports of legislators and their families getting death threats.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

No. Those who are not MAGAts are cowards.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

No one left in congress that stands up. Dem or Republican

Expand full comment
Patty. Dubin's avatar

AOC and Elizabeth Warren, Waltz are screaming at the top of their lungs. Other Dems are also. Republicans are sheep going to the slaughter house

Expand full comment
Hendrik Gideonse's avatar

Plus Independent Angus King. Read his "red line' speech!

Expand full comment
Rachel Simon's avatar

Even our moderate Dem Chuck Schumer has been visibly out and about with local NY Dems, fighting against disinformation from Rep. Marc Molinaro.

I am proud of Senator Schumer for taking time to fight for Dutchess County and our railroads.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

And dragging the rest of us with them.

Expand full comment
kiamanda's avatar

Democrats and the independents do stand up but the republicans vote along party lines

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Let's not forget Jamie Raskin and Adam Schiff.

Expand full comment
Laurie's avatar

None in my state. Not one.

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

I disagree with other comments saying there are no "sane" Republicans in Congress. I believe there is a small, but not ineffectively small number of Republicans who are against the Trump-Musk coup. I'm too exhausted (severe anxiety, sleeplessness, and just made maybe 50 calls to reps and senators) to spell out now why I think they are "sane." But I do not understand the factors that are keeping many of them from banding together and standing up. Yes, some, like McConnell, who happens to be anti-Trump, does not care about ANYONE but himself. But I believe there are others with enough integrity, conscience, and love of democracy that they *should* be honoring their oath, not enabling this coup that will destroy us in ways no native born American can even begin to understand in any experiential way.

Why is this happening? I don't think it's "just politics." My guess is their families are being seriously threatened. That's not at all hard to imagine. My real question is why are they not banding together? Why are they not using the power of numbers and standing up to the threats -- the only way to defang the those threatening them: They can't kill them if they stand up together and expose them. There are still a good dozen senators who could band together. Not only are they not not doing that, but they are complicit. Anyone who voted for Vaught is a complicit enabler. I'm still calling them, ten or twelve of them every day, but the feeling of hopelessness (and an amount of terror that is almost immobilizing me; don't let the calls fool you; I'm not functioning), is overwhelming.

However, Heather's close friend, historian Joanne Freeman, emphasized that these call still matter. Not the content so much; we're not trying to "convince" them. But the numbers, the numbers of calls registered against this coup, the number of Americans who actually know and are announcing that they know what is going on DOES MATTER.

Here's the list I'm using right now. Say whatever the heck you want to get your point across. Call off hours like I do if you don't really want to interact with anyone. The calls will still be counted:

Lisa Murkowski

522 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

(202)-224-6665

Mitch McConnell

Russell Senate Office Building, 317

Washington, DC 20510

202-224-2541

John Thune

United States Senate SD-511

Washington, DC 20510

(202) 224-2321

Senator Todd Young

185 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

202-224-5623

John Cornyn

Hart Senate Office Building, 517

Washington, DC 20510

202-224-2934

Bill Cassidy

455 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

(202) 224-5824

Joni Ernst

260 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

(202) 224-3254

Thom Tillis

113 Dirksen Senate Building

Washington, DC 20510

(202) 224-6342

Susan Collins

413 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

(202) 224-2523

John Curtis

ST-B11 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

202-224-5251

Expand full comment
Don McIntyre's avatar

You've done a lot- thank you. Remember to take care of yourself, too, resting & recharging when you need to.

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

Thank you for your comment, Don. It means a lot right now.

I've been going through hell in my personal life. It's not a problem of not remembering or wanting to take care of myself too. But rather levels of anxiety that are so extraordinarily high that they don't allow me to properly care for myself. I'm getting help, good help, but it's at a very bad point right now. It must shift some soon because this is literally unsustainable. I'm writing much too personally on here because of exhaustion. No need to respond. I just get a compulsion to explain that there are times when we can try our very best to take care of ourselves but be painted into a corner by extraordinary difficulty upon difficulty that make it nearly impossible.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Yes, you are exactly right. Try to isolate the issues you are dealing with from each other. Treat them one at a time, then move to the next one. Then rest when you’re exhausted until you’re ready again. Above all, get mental health help and know you are not alone in your terror.

Expand full comment
Miselle's avatar

Sending a hug your way. Know that you have friends here.

Your list is helpful and valuable. Thank you for posting it.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Sending a virtual hug, a virtual cup of herbal tea, and purrs from my cats to calm your soul.

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Anne B's avatar

Thank you for all that you have done. I love it. Take care.

Expand full comment
KMD's avatar

Thanks for this list. Good luck with the Senior Senator from Maine, Susan Collins! I've already written her twice about her abominable decision to support Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence & have not had a response.

Collins is always, always a disappointment. She has missed having her "Margaret Chase Smith moment" many times during her career. But she has already announced her intention to run for re-election in 2026, so perhaps she fears getting primaried, if she doesn't surrender in advance.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Was she always this namby pamby? Why do Mainers reelect her?

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

She is a phenomenal disappointment. I don’t get her. She doesn’t strike me as totally amoral, and yet she never actually stands up for the right thing. She’s like a vapid empty vessel of….God knows what.

Expand full comment
Clare Evento's avatar

Nomi, I think your voice is first voice I’ve heard that thinks there are possibly 12 Republican senators that have a conscience. I was shocked by Lisa Murkowski voting for Vaught. Your question is chilling! Why don’t they band together and stand up as we slowly walk into this next iteration of our form of government. That nobody asked for.

Expand full comment
Don McIntyre's avatar

As a former Alaskan I watched Murkowski vote against her party on occasions that her vote didn't affect the outcome, same as Susan Collins. Ugh.

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

Yes, that is when they vote the right way. It’s profoundly disappointing and disturbing.

Expand full comment
Hendrik Gideonse's avatar

I recently switched out my recurring contributions to DSCC and and DSCC to ACLU, Indivisible, and Public Citizen "where the action is". The virtual silence from the members of the legislative branch speaks volumes. The silence from the fourth estate is equally deafening. Symbolic, to be sure, but when the N Y Times headlines I receive each morning appeared in my e-mail without any mention of the Super Bowl outcome it struck me as emblematic of even the Gray Lady's failure to tell it like it is. Fortunately, we all have HCR performing the function for us.

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

I can’t say I’m sure of the exact number. But I do feel there are still enough that publicly banding together could make a difference, even the difference. Why they won’t do this is, in informal terms, a crime against humanity. Their oath demands it.

Expand full comment
Mary Hardt's avatar

Nomi, thank you for this information. Please take care of yourself.

Expand full comment
Misty Hook's avatar

Thank you, Nomi, for taking the time to compile this list and share it. I don't want to be negative but including John Cornyn on this list is a mistake. I lived in Texas for 24 years with Cornyn as my senator. He's never done the right thing, so don't expect much from him. However, I'd still love for people to flood his office with calls. At the very least, make him uncomfortable.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Please rest, relax, and take care of yourself. Self-care is even more critical these days.

Expand full comment
Anne B's avatar

Self-care is critical, crucial. Our sanity is the most important thing. (Not gun rights, haha. So crazy. The American public will never go for that. Take care of ourselves and carry on with the calls when and if we can!)

Expand full comment
Phil Kuhn's avatar

Are you assuming there are ANY sane Republicans in Congress? I live in western Mississippi. My Representative [Bennie Thompson] is the lone Democrat from Mississippi in Congress. He has certainly held up the democratic ideals of this nation. My Senators are both Republicans who, if there is no chance it will change the outcome, may demonstrate some independence from tRump. Otherwise, they show every indication they are thinking only of their next career challenge AND NOT at all what history may have to say about their profiles in spinelessness! Their aides will listen politely to any upset with their positions, but are "taking notes to be sure the Senator is aware of my position." I see NO evidence from this deep red state that the Republican Party has any sane elected members. Of course, I see little evidence that there are many Democratic Party members in positions of "power" who have yet given up on the neoliberal economic and political positions that have hamstrung the Party since at least Clinton. I wish I could call myself a Democrat any more, but the Party I used to identify with left me at least 33 years ago. I feel much closer to Bernie Sanders and AOC than to any Democrat I've been allowed to vote for in recent years. Bennie Thompson is certainly not "perfect," but he is certainly head and shoulders above too many of his Democratic colleagues in Congress.

Expand full comment
David Herrick's avatar

I agree. And the Democratic party needs a plan to save our democracy, and they should begin by explaining what is actually happening: that our Constitution has been flushed down the toilet by Congress so as to enable a coup d'etat by the rich folks.

Time is running out. We will wake up to the news that Congress has been disbanded and that Trump is now king. Mass arrests, public executions and concentration camps will follow in short order, and the so-called right to bear arms will be the first to disappear.

Yes, it will seem impossible that such a thing could happen to us. I mean we practically invented democracy didn't we?

HCR! Help!

Expand full comment
bruce klassen's avatar

Maybe David, consider that: 1. The first that needs to happen now is that the DNC restructures itself for action, or disbands. 2. Guantanamo IS already the first Concentration Camp, and it is already filling up, but has room for 60,000. 3. The Greeks invented Democracy and it too failed, it is such a fragile, beautiful thing that if you leave it in the dark it dies.

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

The DNC is in the process to "restructuring" NOW to address coup II realities. That is why KEN MARTIN earned (not won) the new DNC Chairman position after his successful "restructuring" of Minnesota precincts including many down ballot election victories. But, we need much more than a restructured DNC.

As to Marbury vs, Madison holding that Courts "say what the law is", that is 1 reason I became a lawyer. So far since noon 1/2025 Trump II has LOST every single case with 30 more cases pending in federal Court dockets but, only for the last 3 weeks.

Everything is not broken; Fight Back!

Expand full comment
JohnM upstateNY's avatar

Bryan, while tRump II may have lost every single case I have yet seen NO ACTION arising from court decisions halting Musk’s rampage through the treasury and most all other government computers issuing payments. Where is the action which should arise from court orders to HALT, CEASE and DESIST?! As to helping just the rich, I think HCR clarified that Musk has apparently gone after all the many parts of government which have initiated investigations into HIS companies or are paying HIS competitors.

Expand full comment
David Herrick's avatar

Yes, of course the Greeks invented democracy, but I don't believe their slaves could vote. And the Guantanamo camp was established to quickly isolate suspected terrorists in a singular moment of national fear and a certain amount of craziness about the Muslim world and the threat it really represented, though the camp's superficial similarity to the Nazi death camps should be enough to give us pause.

And discovering just how fragile our democracy is is a revelation for most Americans.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

What was really creepy about Guantanamo is the government's argument that those arrested merited no protection from the Constitution or international treaties, and that torture was legitimate so long as we were the ones doing it. It was major breach of rule of law. Also the notion that the unverified suspicion that Iraq was a real and present threat to the US justified a full scale invasion. It seems to me that those distortions of our concepts of presidential and criminal due process have never been adequately corrected, have distorted our society since, and partly paved the way for the reckless over-reach of Trump.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Democracy is a living thing that requires care and feeding.

Expand full comment
Frank Loomer's avatar

You hear HCR going on about the Democratic Party this way?

Expand full comment
David Herrick's avatar

No, Frank, of course not. She's a serious person, an accomplished historian and university professor with a reputation to worry about.

But Trump, Musk and the limp willed GOP are trying to finish off

40+ years of political subversion with a flashy, in your face, nothing-subtle-about-it, way too clever, banana republic coup d'etat, and their lemming-like followers, who have sold their souls for empty promises and a few moments of glory, are pulling us over the cliff with them.

I mean, am I the only one out here who's worried about losing an extremely modest 3-digit Social Security check? And if the US goes down this rathole, won't a lot of other countries be right behind us?

Won't it be great? Grunting, stupidly grinning gringos, standing in line for their gruel, as Musk checks out and heads for Mars. What an ignominious end to our democracy!

Expand full comment
Frank Loomer's avatar

thanks for the thoughts, there does seem to be an out and out coup underday. I was addressing the dumping on Democrats which is going on here

Expand full comment
Hendrik Gideonse's avatar

Can you promise, Musk will rocket off to Mars, hunh, hunh?

Expand full comment
David Herrick's avatar

Hey man, no problem.

Expand full comment
Matt Hesser's avatar

You ate right: all that matters is one word: RE-ELECTION!

Expand full comment
Joan Ehrlich, NYC, UWS's avatar

Do you really think we will have an election in 2 years??

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Trump manufacture an excuse to keep himself in office unlawfully, and to find some illegal pretext for canceling midterm elections.

Expand full comment
Kenneth James's avatar

That is clearly his plan, and it may require declaring a state of emergency and cancelling the Constitution.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Joan, there are more elections in 2025 than there were in 2024. The Republicans have taken advantage of these local elections by almost always running one or more candidates without any Democrats or Independents running. We need to make sure the next generation is engaged.

Expand full comment
Joan Ehrlich, NYC, UWS's avatar

Don't you mean that there are more elections SCHEDULED in 2026. Let's see if they actually happen!!

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Some of them are fools, but some of them have had death threats to their families. I still think if enough of them said enough, it would be at least some brakes on.

Expand full comment
Linda Preston's avatar

Remember what happened to Nancy Pelosi’s husband. Then look at your own loved ones. I am filled with admiration that so many in Congress fight on anyway.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

The Republicans mocked this attack by making all sorts of trashy and false claims about Paul Pelosi’s attack. The criminal who attacked Paul Pelosi was a QAnon nutcase who knew very well what he was doing and wound up fracturing Paul Pelosi’s skull. The nutcase went to the Pelosi home to attack Speaker Pelosi, but she was in Washington.

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

George Washington had a great big target on his back for the redcoats to fire on. Did he go home?

Charles de Gaulle had two targets on his back: one for Germany and one for Vichy. Did he stop his resistance?

Jean Moulin had a target on his back, for the Gestapo. They got him, but do you think, as he died from his torture wounds on his way to Germany, that he regretted one minute standing up for the freedom of his country and organising the internal Resistance in France?

Mahatma Gandhi was imprisoned multiple times and was threatened by many different people, from the British to Hindu nationalists to Islamists. A Hindu nationalist murdered him in the end, but not before he had finished his most important work.

And so on. I know not everyone has the guts to stand up to bullying and threats, but to see so many spineless politicians is disheartening.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Sophie, you just said (much more articulately than my sputtering profanity does) what I think about today's non-MAGA Republikkkans. Cowards, one and all, abdicating their duty and dishonoring their oaths.

Expand full comment
Nomi Lubin's avatar

Yes, I just wrote similar in my comment. I believe there are a small number 10-12 or so, in the Senate who are actually against what is going on, who have some degree of conscience. But death threats to your family will shut up most people, and for sure they are happening. HOWEVER: I believe there are enough non-MAGA Republicans who, if they would just band the hell together, would have the power of numbers. They're not going to kill them if they went public with the threats. They have a constitutional duty to do this. By not doing it, they are complicit, egregiously breaking their oath, living examples of the definition of The Banality of Evil.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I agree. All they would have to do is do it.

Expand full comment
bruce klassen's avatar

No matter what; One must stand up to bullies, always!

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

bruce, I agree, but easier to say than to do especially if families are threatened. I see this theme regularly in series.

Expand full comment
MadRussian12A's avatar

Welp..Bruce, "the bully" in chief, received a reasonably favorable, meaning apparently spontaneous, reception at the football game. His fan-base is alive and kicking. To them he's no bully, he's gettin "it" done. "It" being the operative word his fans would be hard-pressed to respond to. At least in any detail that would hold water. They're not being bullied, they're infatuated by the grandiosity of "it". They've prayed for "it". The Devil launched that bullet and their prayers (ahead of time) prevented his demise. Is there any reason not to be thankful (to the Lord). No! The same bunch will understand the Devil (make that D for Democrat) will make things 'the thug' and 'Musk-nuts' are trying to accomplish painful for us. But, prayers will help those clowns deliver glory in the long run. Dummo-crats ARE the bully. Listen.., our lawmakers aren't spineless.., we let the good ones down, didn't we? Huh? Yeah! This mess is going to have to wear itself out. Lacking any other guidance,we have spiritual leadership at 1600 Pornhub. She, may be the only way out. Take it awayyyy..., Paula White-CAIN.., let us pray.

Expand full comment
Mary Hardt's avatar

Michele, I’d like to see the confirmation votes in the Senate be anonymous for this reason.

Expand full comment
Misty Hook's avatar

Do they think the Democrats in Congress haven't been threatened? Do they think for one minute that Nancy Pelosi, AOC or Elizabeth Warren aren't getting death threats daily? And yet all of them still stand up for what's right. I wish the spineless cowards would just quit. That should get the crazies off their backs and maybe we'd have a chance at true representation.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I am sure they have, but the Rs who disagree haven't figured out that if they came together, they could break this. They are also afraid of being primaried and in that they should just show some spine for the country.

Expand full comment
Misty Hook's avatar

I wish they'd roll the dice and take their chance on primaries versus throwing the country under the bus. But of course, we're talking about Republicans who don't care about anything other than themselves. I am a bit surprised they're allowing Mump the power of the purse though. That makes them irrelevant. I wonder: are they worried about Trump disbanding Congress? Then who would care about them?

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

How many Republicans are there in Congress who didn’t vote to uphold the 2020 election?

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

At the time of the events of Jan 6, 2021, there were 139 members of the House and 8 Senators who voted to overturn the election results. I haven't cross-checked to see how many are still there, but regardless, none of them were held to account for their acts of sedition. I don't know iff this link will work, but give it a try:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Thank you, Bob Caster. I will continue to call them traitors which is what they have established themselves to be.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

ARE there any sane Republicans in Congress? Are any of them looking at all this and saying "Oh, my! THIS isn't right!"? Because if they are, then they are the most snivelling cowards in our country's history. I wait every day for just ONE of them, however minor a figure, to stand up and say "NO!"

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Tillis has been making excuses for Trump’s behavior, which he knows very well is both illegal and unconstitutional. The Republicans will do nothing to stop Trump, and he wants to defy the courts if they try reining in his behavior.

Expand full comment
Gail V. Ritchie's avatar

Are there sane Republicans?

Expand full comment
Wayne Horvath's avatar

Lincoln Project might be a worthwhile start for some.

Expand full comment
Sharon Stearley's avatar

No!

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

I think sanity was a deal breaker. The ones that didn't leave were kicked out.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Time for all sane Republicans to "go to the mattress." Ramp up their families' security - then band together and speak up with one voice.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Lady E, do you mean "go to the mat" as in the wrestling mat/boxing ring, or to the mattress, as in nap time? I read this as "dump ffpotus and start to fight."

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

You never saw "The Godfather"? It's a Mafia term - means sending your family away to safety - and all the fighters gather together to prepare. Comes from when they'd all sleep in one location - and had to use mattresses on the floor.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Ahhh, thank you. Never heard of that.

Expand full comment
Bob Tinsman's avatar

They're afraid of stepping out of bounds and getting primaried by Trump or his minions. Or getting death threats. But I'm hoping people get so sick of this nonsense that they turn out a bunch of them at midterms., or in special elections coming up soon.

Expand full comment
Sue Laubersheimer's avatar

Sane? “Christian?” Patriotic? Intelligent? Educated? Supporters of family values?

Expand full comment
Anne B's avatar

Call your representatives. Call each Senator and your Congressional representative. Call the DC office of each and a local office of each. That's 6 calls. Make them short. I am _____, a resident of _____. I do not like Musk in the Treasury payment system. I trust you agree. (or whatever you want to say) Make it short. Control the rage.

Expand full comment
Craig's avatar

Unfortunately, "Sane Republicans" is now, officially, an oxymoron. If one appears, we'll have to catch it for observation. MAGApublicans control the party and back The Orange Dictator to the END.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Thay sold their soul and trumpp and Musk don't have any.

Expand full comment
Public Servant's avatar

Thank you for recognizing civil servants, Heather! My partner was fired from their DEI position in the federal government. My colleagues and I are resisting fascism and saving democracy by gathering evidence of Musk and his minions' crimes: https://democracydefender2025.substack.com/p/no-one-elected-elon

Expand full comment
Norma DeLiberty's avatar

Sending my best wishes to you and your husband. Ignoring worker's rights is a significant injustice. Loyal service, smarts, and hard work benefits society -- and such workers deserve to be treated with dignity.

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

Wake up America …when the jobless rate surpasses that of the Great Depression and we sink lower in the world eyes than T’s current ‘ratings’ / ‘rantings’…….when ..when…THEN?

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

So sorry your partner lost their job. That is just disgusting.

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

TY🫶

Expand full comment
Wallis Raemer's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
MARIAN KORNICKI's avatar

Our country and our democracy are worth fighting for . It will not end well for MT.

Expand full comment
Sandee Alpern's avatar

Hmmm... too me a while, I thought you meant "Marjorie Taylor" (Green) when you wrote MT! Though I don't think this will end well for her either!!! 🙄

Expand full comment
John Jennrich's avatar

Y'all are whistling past the graveyard. Unfortunately, Trump/Musk and their cult are on the winning side right now until some significant event occurs to change that. I don't know what that event might be, but it cannot be something subtle.

Expand full comment
Tom Muir's avatar

I'm afraid that I have to agree with you John.

Expand full comment
Anne B's avatar

So what? Things looked bad when France fell in WWll. You keep going. Make the calls, then go for a walk if you have to. Love what you have.

Expand full comment
Constance J Falcone's avatar

Outside forces rescued France. I believe outside forces (please not China!) are our main hope.

Expand full comment
Anne B's avatar

That's interesting about outside forces. Please, not China - Indeed!

Expand full comment
Monnina's avatar

These global criminals have been seducing and violently forcing their way into political power from the financial shadows for decades. They are joyously displaying their innate corruption and insane ambition to the world now that they have grabbed the White House. However, the third law of thermodynamics can not ever be sidestepped and the entropically resistant have no choice but to react in kind 🐈‍⬛

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

I’ll be clapping then too Sandee

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

Looks like to me they are all gaining momentum

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

They are, no road blocks in sight. Project 2025 planned well. Chump was smart to lie about it, and MAGAts were blinded by love for the devil. They (and us) will get what they serve

Expand full comment
Sandee Alpern's avatar

Momentum is great… that is, until you run into a wall… then, it’s not so great, not so great at all!! That’s what I’m looking for…. the sooner the better.

Expand full comment
joe alter's avatar

https://www.whatthehellareyoudoing.org/post/my-great-concern-is-not-whether-you-have-failed-but-whether-you-are-content-with-your-failure

it's hard to imagine how this all can be fixed, without getting a whole lot worse, but we all gotta leave no stone unturned

Expand full comment
Pam Taylor's avatar

Joe, it's going to be hard to look under all the stones which have been piled up by Trump to try to block our path of resistance to his illegal and unjust actions. By all means, let's make it easier to obtain guns, and harder to obtain health care. Let's loosen gun control laws and strengthen laws that will harm so many. Let's support gun totin' by dangerous thugs, and not support help for the veterans who faced guns in defense of our freedoms. Let's say the right to own guns is more important than the right to obtain a decent education or a decent wages, or to be assured the right to vote. Let's put more guns on the street and take away more books from the schools. Let's say we believe in law and order, and then let dangerous criminals out to draw their guns and threaten innocent citizens into doing their bidding. Trump talks out of both sides of his mouth and his two faces, and would love to take us back to the wild west, where guns are drawn and rights are erased.

Expand full comment
joe alter's avatar

I think it's mistake to assume that all the courts are 100% onboard with scotus 2025.

Here for example is what judge Coughenhour (a reagan appointee) said about T's Birthright Citizenship proclamation the other day from the bench of a Washington District Court as he issued a temporary restraining order :

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case where the question presented was as clear,” Coughenour said.

“Where were the lawyers” when the decision to sign the executive order was made, the judge asked. He said that it “boggled” his mind that a member of the bar would claim the order was constitutional.

You simply cannot assume that the courts are unpersuadable that this guy's dangerous, it's just taken them a while to arrive at the table.

Expand full comment
joe alter's avatar

nobody is an expert in what "won't work", and a pro might be more likely to pick the thing that would surely work, and fail because he didn't pick the core issue - Jack Smith, I believe, made that mistake calling it "election interference", when insurrection is starring you right in the face saying "uh, hellloooooo"

Expand full comment
Pam Taylor's avatar

I think the core issue is with the Republican- led Congress who has allowed Donald Trump to keep doing what he and Project 2025 hope to accomplish. They've had chance after chance to stop him, or at least slow him down. They won't dare defy him on anything.

I have been thankful that the Attorneys General, judges and lawyers have stepped up to try to put a halt to this madness, which most likely wouldn't be happening had not Republican Congress members lost their integrity and their spine. We'll see what happens.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Here’s the problem -> person defies court order -> judge finds him in contempt of court -> tells federal marshal to go arrest him -> Trump tells head of US Marshals Svc to stand down. Then what?

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

Great analogy Pam ..we romanticized those times …irony often wears thin

Expand full comment
Jean(Muriel)'s avatar

Absolutely correct! Thank you. Very articulate dissection of reality.

Pam will help lead us through truth!!!

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

You got to take back social media first. Then provide a leader that campaigns more than complains? Anyone know of Biden’s top ten accomplishments? Trump published those upon leaving the office last time.

Expand full comment
JaKsaa's avatar

Plus Retail Blackout of Feb/28/2025. Spread the Word!!!

Expand full comment
S Brasseux's avatar

What is this? Can you elaborate please.

Expand full comment
JaKsaa's avatar

February 10, 2025

Google …

U.S. economic blackout planned for Feb. 28

A U.S. Economic Blackout — a  nationwide economic protest — is scheduled for Friday, Feb. 28, 2025. On this day, participants are encouraged to refrain from making any purchases, both online and in-store, from large corporations. The aim is to demonstrate the collective power of consumers and to advocate for economic change. Essential purchases, such as paying bills and buying necessities, are generally considered acceptable, but the emphasis will be on minimizing non-essential spending to make a significant economic impact.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

The other team doesn't have a choice either. They been planning this takeover for years and invested billions. They are here for the long run, not for just for a couple of years and loose everything in the midterm election. Brace yourself Rosemary.

Expand full comment
David Gagne's avatar

But we do have a choice.

If we want to save our country we will have to get physically involved.

And BTW saving our country is bigger than saving democracy.

We are going to have to take to the streets - many times. We may be called upon to take part in a general strike.

We might be called upon to swarm Tesla supply points to upset their production. Or take over and remove Musk flunkies from government offices.

Can you do that?

Can you do what it takes to save your country?

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

The Choice has been made…too many people call themselves Christians who worship the tin god that they have created. They are ”anti-abortion zealots, would-be censors, homophobes, bigots and latter-day Elmer Gantry’s.” I know them, we all know them, the republican Party embraced them. Unwise is the nicest thing one can say. They have sold us to the traitors. We can blather on, but to what end.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

I think it is going very well for Trump and Musk. They control the narrative. The democrats are not vocal. I think our democracy is already gone.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

I fear this is true.

Expand full comment
Stephen Schiff's avatar

We will keep our democracy only if we fight for it. That Vance should float a threat to ignore the judiciary is an outrage and should result in calls for his head, mass protests verging on violence, clogged telephone switchboards in Congress demanding his resignation or impeachment.

.

Ask yourself: What am I doing to preserve our Constitution?

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

As today more affidavit comes through, that people are beginning to see the ‘COUP’ for what it is. It heartens me though progress is far slower than they. This means far more will fall having played their part in this ‘COUP’ and every.one.of.them. should realize the consequences that haven’t been exacted for far too long a time.

It’s when it hits home that’s when people pay attention.

What will be the costs?

Well how far will we.the.people. let them go? That’s how far…

Savings will be gone.

IRAs will be gone.

The Stock Market

The credit AND credibility of the US…gone,gone,and more gone

BUT…there will always remain the cons who saw to it .

(I hope many are in jail..stop this steal anytime you’d like)

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

More “affidavit” comes through? I’m unclear what that means. What makes you think more people are realizing this disaster?

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

Personal contact. I have many Republican friends, even family. A few informed me they had made a mistake, didn’t know, saw through Trumps thin disguise shortly after T-1 in 2016. But now more are saying this, triple times in fact- in far less the time span (of the T-2.0).

People , including myself at times, make mistakes. People get sucked in ,from their own makeups/reasonings. I rarely ‘give up’ on people-may stay distant , may walk away (for long periods). Differences of opinion are usually ways for me to question my own belief system ( systems) , I will listen to their different ‘take’, respect perhaps.

There’s so much common thought process clouded by intention division tactics…that’s how autocrats work ‘their people’..long before casting them aside/under the bus/“you’re fired”. Classic.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Now I understand. Keep up the good work. I hope the ppl you are talking to tell others. Ps what was it that that occurred that made them have second thoughts?

Expand full comment
Michael Corthell's avatar

- Pulled Quote -

''In fact, it is the right to vote for the lawmakers who make up our government that is foundational to maintaining all other rights held by Americans.''

Agreed. The right to vote is the foundation of democracy. It ensures that power remains in the hands of the people, allowing them to hold leaders accountable, shape policies, and push for change. Without it, democracy collapses into authoritarianism, where a select few control the fate of many.

Expand full comment
Patty. Dubin's avatar

From your mouth to God's ears.

Expand full comment
Hendrik Gideonse's avatar

A contrasting view (would we could have a through discussion of it between HCR and Mt. Milman) can be found in a companion piece to HCR’s powerful message today -- Noah Milman’s opinion piece in today’s (2/10/2025) NYTimes. An early observation there notes the “ scope of President Trump’s challenge to the existing constitutional order — largely through a blitzkrieg of executive orders, many of them in blatant disregard of established precedent and legislation — suggests we may be in the process of (a) discontinuous and disruptive moment.”

Expand full comment
Scott Emery's avatar

Only if we get in the streets en masse, repeatedly, to nonviolently demand that Trump's authoritarian actions come to a halt. Work stoppages. Civil disobedience. That is how democracy MIGHT prevail. There is nothing fated about it. It is up to us.

Expand full comment
Judith Berghuis's avatar

I too pray you're right, Rosemary.

Expand full comment
Andrew Potter's avatar

I posted this to Joyce Vance’s comments section last week, and several people there found it helpful, so I am sharing it here too.

We’re often told that our representatives in Washington pay attention to what their voters are telling them. So, we need to be telling them what we think. So, I am trying to get in the habit of letting them know what I am thinking. Maybe you could do that too. But if you are unaccustomed to calling your Senators or Congressperson, you might be a little uncomfortable with it.

Maybe this will help:

For one thing, in my experience, my calls have always (so far) gone to voicemail. So, if your stressed about actually talking to a live senator or staffer, I am thinking the likelihood of that is small.

I keep the phone numbers for my Senators and Congressman in my contacts list on my cell phone. That way I don’t have to look them up when I get the urge to call. However, before making a call, I jot down a few notes, summarizing what I plan to say, what I am asking them to do. Referring to the notes helps me avoid going blank or getting off on a tangent once I am on the call. Be brief and to the point. Be polite and friendly. Really, there is not much to gained by calling your senator to tell them there is no chance in hell you’d ever vote for her.

I don’t request a callback. I just want them to know what I am thinking.

If you don’t know who your congressperson is (how quickly we forget), just go to

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

and key in your zip code.

If you don’t know who your senator is, just go to

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

You will need to know what state you live in :)

It’s that simple, ez-pz

Expand full comment
Diane Schuler's avatar

Another good source is www.5calls.org. put in your zip code to get names and contact information of your officials.

Expand full comment
Ron McKenzie's avatar

5Calls also can connect you to their local offices where you’re more likely to reach a human.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Raymond's avatar

Thanks for this link, Diane. This is a great site.

Expand full comment
LornaM's avatar

Thank you!! It’s all there…ready set go!

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

I found that site very helpful; thanks for posting the link!

Expand full comment
Danielle (NM)'s avatar

Thanks for posting these links. I suggest that while at that site, you save the phone numbers for both of their DC and local offices. The Congress’ switchboard in DC has been so overwhelmed with calls, it crashed last Monday. You are more likely to get through to their direct lines. I found the DC clerks I talked to polite and helpful, but at the local office, they were more willing to chat beyond taking a brief message. Keep your messages short and specific to one or two issues. Make multiple calls if you need to, but they tally call topics and give the representative a count of calls for/against the top topics for the day.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Andrew, I called my senators last week and got a written response from one who wrote about what she was doing to counter what is happening.

I'm calling again tomorrow to urge them to vote NAY on RFK jr. I'm also calling Sen. Cassidy's office with the same message.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

You (1) get a response and that (2) tells you what she is going to do?? I didn’t know such a thing existed!

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Hawley and Burlison ignore me.

Expand full comment
Andrew Potter's avatar

Years ago I used to receive nice letters from Senator Shelby (AL), with whom I frequently disagreed, but at least he was polite.

But I have yet to receive anything from the current delegation. My assumption though is that someone is keeping a tally...

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Yes, MLM, it was a lengthy email that responded to the concerns many of her constituents expressed to her office. Not all is well, though— she voted to confirm a couple nominees.

Expand full comment
Judy Somerd's avatar

Lucky you. My rep responded also. He was trying to justify why he disagreed with me😡

Expand full comment
wabisabisoul's avatar

I live in FL, so if I get any response I expect it to be like yours. Even so, it helps them to know we have not lost our voices.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Excellent !! Best advice. 👍

Expand full comment
Lori's avatar

5calls.org is a huge help, also.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

The American people have responded to Presidents Musk and Trump with vigor. I'm sure many of the calls they receive are nasty and therefore, they let them go to voicemail, plus many people think that threatening their representatives is helpful for some reason. I can understand why they want to listen to the voice mails.

If you prefer to send email or mail instead, you don't need to be concerned with arguing with someone on the other end of the phone. Since the offices are being bombarded, with correspondence, all they really have time to do is tabulate "for" and "against" on any topic.

So keep it brief. If you want to weigh in on more than one topic, call multiple times.

Expand full comment
Doreen's avatar

write, call EVERY DAY! It does have an impact!

Expand full comment
Judy Somerd's avatar

Andrew I did the same but have now put www.5calls.org in my contacts. Works really well Keep up the calls!

Expand full comment
Andrew Potter's avatar

Looks good, I may update my method.

Expand full comment
Bonnie's avatar

Using the Five Calls app is easy. They give you the phone numbers you need and provide a script.

Expand full comment
LornaM's avatar

Thank you!! Very helpful.

Expand full comment
Mike's avatar

How often do you call? Do you call each time only about a single issue? I understand that calls are logged and the staffers try to sort them under topics to give a tally yea or nay on an issue.

Expand full comment
Andrew Potter's avatar

I wish I could claim I called every time I read Heather every morning, but I don't. More like a couple of times a week. I spend more time preparing my notes for the call than actually talking.

Also I've found at least for Senator Britt, there is time limit on the length of a message. If brevity is the soul of wit, I am going to need to be more witty.

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

Thanks again , Andrew. Excellent🫶

Expand full comment
Steve Abbott's avatar

You da bomb! Thanks!

Expand full comment
Jason Orcamoon's avatar

A friend wrote this letter to his Nevada rep and gave me permission to post it for others to adapt:

Dear Representative Amodei,

In your email to constituents dated February 7th,”The Amodei Report: Roundup of Presidential Actions”, you stated that “while some of [President Trump’s executive] actions may be controversial, it is important to note that they have all been executed within the framework of democracy.”

I beg to differ, Sir! Federal judges of the United States disagree with you, vehemently!

In less than 3 weeks on the job, President Trump’s administration has been sued over his executive orders in court 41 separate times. This is a record for any president in our history. A running record of these lawsuits can be found at Just Security’s online litigation tracker, here: https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

In addition to the large number of lawsuits, several restraining orders have already been issued against Trump’s actions by federal judges, including a judge appointed by Trump himself. These include restraining orders against:

--- Trump’s Federal Funding Freeze, cutting off funding for Head Start, school meal programs, access to SNAP and WIC program benefits, and halting critical medical research.

Do you agree with cutting off federal funds for these vital programs, Mr. Amodei?

— Trump’s DOGE access to the Treasury Payment System. Some experts are calling this DOGE action the largest digital data breach in U.S. history, with millions of Americans’ social security numbers, Medicare health histories, bank account numbers, and financial records having potentially been exposed. There are doubts now about the system’s vulnerability to future hacking attempts.

Do you condone this activity, Mr. Amodei?

— Trump’s order ending Birthright Citizenship, in contravention of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, nominated to the bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, said in blocking Trump’s order that “it has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for his political or personal gain. Nevertheless, in this courtroom and under my watch, the rule of law is a bright beacon which I intend to follow.”

Judge Coughenour went on to say: “I said this two weeks ago, and I’ll say it again today: There are moments in the world’s history when people look back and ask, ‘Where were the lawyers, where were the judges?’ In these moments, the rule of law becomes especially vulnerable. I refuse to let that beacon go dark today.”

Gee, Mr. Amodei, it doesn’t sound like this federal judge agrees with your opinion that Trump’s orders are being “executed within the framework of democracy.” Phrases such as “blatantly unconstitutional”, “moments in world history…the rule of law becomes especially vulnerable”, “where were the lawyers?”, “the rule of law is something for [Trump] … to navigate around or ignore”… these phrases do not comport with the idea of Trump “execut[ing] within the framework of democracy.”

Mr. Amodei, I suggest you start thinking for yourself and stop simply parroting GOP talking points. Our democracy and our Constitution are under attack from a lawless president. I recommend you think more deeply about your oath to support and defend the Constitution, and about your future place in history.

I note that you have a law degree and have practiced law for over 20 years prior to becoming a congressman. It seems that Judge Coughenour’s words apply directly to you, Mr. Amodei: “There are moments in the world’s history when people look back and ask ‘Where were the lawyers, where were the judges?”

Where will you be when history looks back on you, Counselor?

Lastly, how about a town hall meeting in your district, Counselor? I went to the “Meet Mark” link on your website, and all I found was your bio and portrait, and list of committees. How about a meeting with your constituents?

Sincerely,

Your Constituent

Reno, NV

Expand full comment
Cynthia Cromwell's avatar

Such a thoughtful, competent response to a legal representative who should have known better!

Expand full comment
pts's avatar

Outstanding. We all need to constantly hold our elected representatives' feet to the fire equally forcefully and articulately. They work for us -- force them to report back to us and in public, explain themselves and their betrayal of the Constitution. Or if Dems, in many cases explain their failure to step up immediately and fight ferociously for it, and for us.

Expand full comment
100Panthers's avatar

Amodei has a law degree! He knows better. What a POS! Another MAGA turd, an orange Trump dropping, a pile of GOP CaCa.

Expand full comment
Barbara Pierce's avatar

Excellent! Copying and saving for adapting for my useless congressional representatives…😞

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar
Feb 10Edited

The highly illegal actions of the executive branch do not even resemble our U.S. "framework of democracy.” He must be referring to some other democracy he likes. U.S. Legislators write, modify, or repeal laws, not the executive. It falls to the executive to faithfully assure those laws are enforced. At every turn and event of the past four weeks, the legislature has willfully abdicated their constitutional duties ! Why are they being paid ?

Expand full comment
Lee Houten's avatar

This is perfect! Do you mind if I share this?

Expand full comment
Jason Orcamoon's avatar

Lee - please, my friend says adapt and share away! I have mentioned before here that I am waiting until 1 May, the 101 day point, to assess where we are as a nation. I feel that we need a few Rs to switch to D or I in the House and the Senate and take the majorities away from the Christofascists. Letters like this might lead a few to switch.

Expand full comment
A doc reads's avatar

Bravo Jason!

Expand full comment
Alicia Morgan's avatar

Thank you for sharing, and thank your friend for giving permission to use/adapt. Will be sending letters, emails and phone calls this week. Every day. (I live in deep red Indiana)

Expand full comment
Jason Orcamoon's avatar

Done! I’ve thanked him and he’s grateful so many are adapting and sharing.

I have mentioned before here that I am waiting until 1 May, the 101 day point, to assess where we are as a nation. I feel that we need a few Rs to switch to D or I in the House and the Senate and take the majorities away from the Christofascists. Letters like this might lead a few to switch.

As time goes by many RShits are going to be bombarded by their constituents as they find they have no place to sell their peanuts, wheat, etc; inflation is going up, not down; cars now cost 1,000s more; etc, etc, etc.

Remember the “I did this” Joe Biden stickers that MAGIDIOTS were putting on gas pumps? I have friends starting to see those stickers with Orange Hitler pointing at egg prices.

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

He has got his own Substack page folks, hint hint

Expand full comment
Helen Stajninger's avatar

Excellent Jason. Thanks for these guidelines…

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

It gets scarier by the day. We cannot give up or give in.

Expand full comment
Susan Friedman's avatar

Wow. this outstanding explanation or how our government was designed to work,which the current leaders do not seem to or choose to know or choose to overturn, is SO POWERFUL. This should be out rallying battle cry as it so clearly shows what they are trying to do for them and against we the people. Raise your voices. Thanks. a perfect letter for us today and the generations who hopefully come, still have a democracy and can read

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Our representatives in both houses of Congress are mostly not leaders but followers who gladly go whichever way the wind blows. And just now they stagnate performatively making feeble gestures born of uncertainty and fear.

Do these sound like leaders to you? To me, with some notable worthy exceptions, they look like a befuddled herd of cattle. Each representing in a cowering huddle personal position and advantage rather than constituency and principle.

Even more so than MAGA, these who fail to vigorously represent their constituents create the very dark times that now envelop us.

Expand full comment
MaryPat's avatar

My U.S. Rep votes however his owner, Enbridge, instructs him to.

Expand full comment
Marilyn MacGregor's avatar

Let’s not keep doing the ‘both sides’ thing. It could not be clearer where the problem lies. Heather, along with everything we see going on, explains it perfectly.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

No need to make all this your only step. Don’t wait for someone else to draw you a map before you walk out of the desert.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

There isn’t “both sides thing”. We are all constituents of our State and District representatives. Every oath of office I’m aware of contains this premise. You are represented … it is the only legitimacy of holding public office. This is simple. Officials elected to public office cannot pick and choose in a democracy who they’d prefer to represent on a single issue. Do not declare, call, write, email, text, and call again. Demand representation on one issue. repeat. You are by definition a constituent.

The cattle herd I referred to knows no party distinction.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Call again on your next issue. Don’t stare at the wall in frustration. Speak up and make a difference. Make use of our democracy.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

The Republican Congress has rolled over for its favorite criminal.

Ali Velshi today spoke with Vladimir Kara-Murza on how this happens -- on how neutered specialists and billionaire techies always serve criminality.

They care only for money, and its corollary, that their platforms seize market share by algorithms grabbing those most prone to hatreds, fears, and sensationalism.

Our schools could counter this tech billionaire vulgarity. Could, but can’t, due to earlier triumph – the choke of standardized tests prioritizing thinking by categories, grouped units, and other neutered abstractions.

Every country that sinks to autocracy and dictatorship has first rid humanities from its schools. Group think by cliché, slogans, and other non-teacher-imposed packaging replaces them. Neutered language atomizes specializations thence void of the personal, the arts, and history.

Vladimir Kara-Murza personally paid that price in Russia, just as had Alexei Navalny – just as U.S. tech billionaires are now exacting.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Thank you for writing about Kata-Murza. He is a patriot of the same courage as our Nathan Hale. May he survive all he has undergone physically and continue to speak out.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Excellent post, Phil.

Expand full comment
Judy Rigali's avatar

That was a powerful and frightening moment with Kara-Murza and Velshi! I really wished it could have been presented in full to the American people!

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Thanks for this, Phil. I am going to look up that interview with Kara-Murza. Your assessment of "...just as U.S. tech billionaires are now exacting" is spot on.

Expand full comment
Gene Krzyzynski's avatar

In a flash, we've become a bully nation, an aggressor nation and, yes, a fascist nation. And the bad guys have all the big guns. When the history of the Trump era is written, it'll be filed under "T," for Tragedy.

Expand full comment
Frida's avatar

Oh hardly in a flash. Ask Black people, ask women. It’s been a bully nation to large swaths of the population who are not non-white men

Expand full comment
Barbara Keating's avatar

👆👍 some folks “see” and understand regardless of their life cirucmstance, others never will unless it affects them personally in some way.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Tina, had one person tell me this last week that there was no racism in our history. I did not let that stand.

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

I would add "tyranny."

Expand full comment
100Panthers's avatar

Hopefully also 'T' for Turning Point. Come midterms and next presidential election if the electorate reloads another dose of MAGAism, then it's time to seek out that second passport.

Expand full comment
Gene Krzyzynski's avatar

The assumption being that there will even be '26 midterms or any more presidential elections, except in the phoniest, most perfunctory Putin-esque form. Trump and Musk admire despots.

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Apparently so does the majority legislature and the some of the judiciary.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Our states have in many cases become laboratories for authoritarianism and one part control. Republicans gerrymander the states they control to give themselves an artificial majority and to make it look as they have more support than they do. When that happens, voters become passive and cynical and are less willing to vote because they believe their votes don’t matter.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Welcome to Missouri.

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

I feel your pain Gregg. ? As of now, should it be spelled "Misery" ? Lol....

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Right you are my attentive friend; Exactly the points I'm leaning at. So, would our righteous case, perhaps undertaken by the ACLU, "taxation without representation" ? Didn't we toss an empire aside for such actions ? Btw Kathy. Please send me a note letting me know if you get or receive this additional comment. I'm trying to see how this whole substack handles such things. Thank you !

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

Out of interest - who comes to mind for you when you talk about the other side? Who could be the leaders? AOC?

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

AOC, Jasmine Crockett, David Hogg, other members of "the squad". I think you'll see young folks out of Michigan and Wisconsin coming forward as well. The state senators from Tennessee who got thrown out of the legislature and reelected.

There will be others.

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Oh I totally agree Ally. However there are seniority issues that must be respected. I suggest many minds might find a palatable solution; Those are certainly needed in these uncertain times. I think we may have to push the seniority leaders for needed solutions. I referred to such ideas a long time ago when I suggested that the Dem party, in order to thrive and become attractive again to voters they've critically lost, will have to find blunt honesty and humility. I can't point back to my statement without digging, but I know I said that around the runup to elections. They've lost so many working class (dirty hands) voters, and I'm sure they won't get them back without humility and blunt honesty. They've allowed via their arrogance, for the gop to define them, their positions,, and even 'words.'

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

I think that's one of the Dems biggest problems - "seniority issues that must be respected".

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

It's a good and respectable rule Sabine. There are also ways to work around and with it, if they have the humility.

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Did you ever find me on FB ? I haven't checked that DE email I gave you for quite some time.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

And treason.

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

I'm scared here in lill' old Australia - I can't even imagine how scared you must be.

Expand full comment
Emily's avatar

I now understand the phrase "a nightmare you can't wake up from."

Expand full comment
Janet W.'s avatar

The vast majority of us are terrified. People are actually afraid for their lives and are being fired without cause as entire governmental departments are taken out. Add in the DOGE teenagers/20 year olds who got their hands on the U.S. Treasury data base and payment system and one's brain simply explodes. trump’s intent to annex, purchase, or seize any country that suits his madness is also deeply alarming. Even more disturbing is the fact that his supporters and so-called republican leadership continue to justify and enable his reckless and illegal ambitions. The U.S. is an embarrassment, dangerous and given his inflammatory rhetoric, it’s not far-fetched to imagine facing retaliation from a NATO ally. The situation is utterly insane. The bottom line is this is not going to end well.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Thank you. It’s good to know we still have friends.

Expand full comment
ASBermant's avatar

Hopefully, Australia isn't on Trump's conquest list!

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

Just got slapped with a 25% tariff on Aluminium and I think steel, in addition to the already existing tariffs. Just means we're gonna sell more to China, I suppose. A few more weeks of this and people all over the world will change the supply chains. When that's finished I reckon many will be surprised how little the US is needed by the other 7.7 billion people.

One day we'll all play nicely again - one hopes!

Expand full comment
Hugh Spencer's avatar

organising a big International Sand Box on the Gold Coast - with referees. Will it work? probably not - but boy, the publicity!

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Yet. Maybe China's.

Expand full comment
Mike Brown's avatar

Not scared, pissed off. The Second Amendment works for everyone, not just those that seek to overturn our Constitution.

Expand full comment
100Panthers's avatar

I'd think Australia is about as far out of the 'line of fire' as a country could be.

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

With 38 US military bases and our consecutive governments having sold the country as stationary aircraft carrier and submarine repairshop for the US Army through AUKUS?

By far not as far out as I would wish.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Unless Trump wants to build an all American amusement park there.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Or a resort

Expand full comment
bruce klassen's avatar

But, they keep on running to the conflict to take their positions in the line of fire. Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!

Expand full comment
Sabine Hahn's avatar

Nobody in this country in the last few decades was ever keen on following the US anywhere into their ill-intentioned quarrels, but the US is a bully and Australia has as part of its national character unfortunately a colonial submissiveness imo.

Expand full comment
Cecil Bothwell's avatar

I am of the opinion that court orders for Musk to not do anything related to data are already too late. With days of access the data is long downloaded. With time to insert new code who is to determine if back doors are wide open to the conspirators? I suspect we are in for what Russians experienced after the collapse of the Soviet Union, on steroids.

Expand full comment
ASBermant's avatar

On Saturday, Indivisible Santa Barbara sponsored a rally. With just 5 day's notice, approximately 1,000 people showed up - 500 people the Unitarian Society and another 500 people filled the gallery and outside courtyard. Congressperson Salud Carbajal and other current and past State and local representatives spoke. One speaker, Santa Barbara County Supervisor Laura Capps, inspired us all with the following:

In the face of Chaos, we offer clear-eyed vision.

While they spread hate, we spread hope.

While they spread racism we spread respect.

While they spread fear, we spread facts.

While they spread division, we spread determination.

They are led by a convicted felon, we are led by conviction and faith.

Thank you, Supervisor Capps, for your inspirational and empowering words!

Expand full comment
sojpod's avatar

Thanks for writing about this. So many people here (and on other platforms) lament that all is lost, and that no one is doing anything. It seems like that based on what much of MSM reports, but many across the nation -- from Democratic party politicians to regular people to civil servants and beyond -- ARE protesting and fighting back.

In addition to "Letters from an American," Heather Cox Richardson has a great show talking about history, how to fight back, and often appears on shows with others sharing that same goal. I find her shows quite empowering and (counter-intuitive, maybe) optimistic. (You can find her show on YouTube and Facebook -- just search for her name -- and she usually adds info above and beyond what's in her "Letters from an American.")

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

MUSK, THE GRIM REAPER, SHAFTS AMERICAN CONSUMERS

Musk posted on X “CFPB RIP” with an emoji of a gravestone. Russell Vought, new director of the Office of Budget and Management, ordered that the CFPB staff should cease all investigations.

CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), established as an independent federal agency in 2011, by 2024 had recovered $20 billion for over 30,000,000 consumers in refunds and cancelled debts.

Recent settlements for ‘bait and switch’ include $3 billion with TD Bank and $2 billion from Wells Fargo. On January 14, 2025 Capital One was sued for a ‘bait and switch’ that cost consumers over $2 billion.

CFPB was responsible for ‘consumer protection’ in the financial sector including:

1) banks

2) credit unions

3) security firms

4) payday lenders

5) mortgage-servicing operations, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors, and for-profit colleges

6) other financial institutions operating in the United States.

Banks, credit companies, and others have lobbied heavily to restrict or kill CFPB. During Trump’s initial presidency, CFPB’s activities were seriously constrained.

There has been no government agency in American history that has so effectively protected consumers against large financial institutions. These class action suits recovered over $20 billion for consumers which never would have occurred in singular consumer complaints.

Republicans objected to the creation of CFPB. Many financial institutions are thrilled at CFPB’s likely demise.

In the Musk Stormtrooper Blitzkrieg, the killing of the CFPB so far is the greatest loss to the American consumers. The loss is measurable and despicable.

Expand full comment
100Panthers's avatar

We need a deep recession. Watch MAGA Musk lose 2/3 of his wealth, sales of his cars flounder and then let's see how much time he has for screwing the federal government.

Expand full comment
Keith Wheelock's avatar

100 I would like Musk to be sued for child support. He seems to carry an occasional child around like an old-fashioned fox fur.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

The child is his body armor....

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Trump’s reliance on tariffs will actually cause a serious recession.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Musk won't, but MAGA will.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

You know of what you speak.

Expand full comment
Anne Marie's avatar

Great post again,Keith!

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Damn, Keith. Thanks for this comment.

Measurable and despicable indeed.

Expand full comment
MaryPat's avatar

Yes. Despicable.

Expand full comment
Dave G's avatar

He can issue all the executive orders he wants, and he and his minions will certainly deface and debase America around the world, but they do not get to write the history books. I don't understand a group of people who want to try once more to take a path that has proven time and again to fail in the end.

Expand full comment
HarrisWalz FTW 2024's avatar

They might. They're already re-writing them in Florida to remove the history of slavery because "it might make students uncomfortable." Gee, what are they? Snowflakes?

Expand full comment
Dave G's avatar

Florida is trying, I agree. And the Administration is trying to eliminate certain language and references from its publications, but the archives exist and will exist long after they're gone. They will fail in the end.

Expand full comment
HarrisWalz FTW 2024's avatar

I'd like to believe that. Right now, on my good days I'm keeping myself within a range of hope. Sadly, it's too early for certainty.

I'd bet the rent that history books in Russia don't include information about how people who defy Putin end up "falling" out of windows and off bridges or that the pages contain chapters about the life of Alexei Navalny or the courage of Vlodymyr Zelensky.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

You are correct. A version that covered Stalin in 1937 exists. I read half (it’s 800 pages covering the show trials) and had to quit. Hoping nothing as terrible has to be written about US, but given the Putin connections of DT and Skum, it is possible.

Expand full comment
Scott Culbreth's avatar

Is it time to buy bulletproof vests?

Expand full comment
Justin Bradley's avatar

Your comment made me think of Orwell's '1984' and how they would change historical facts and throw the previous published facts down the "memory hole" to erase any evidence that the facts were ever different. Only, nowadays, increasingly there is no physical act of throwing anything in the "memory hole"; just a few pushes of a button and -- poof! -- the web page is republished, undesired information vanishes into the ether, and nobody may ever know any different. That article from WaPo you read a year ago that said such-and-such about so-and-so? When you go back to cite it for research, it suddenly no longer says what it used to.

Expand full comment
Janet W.'s avatar

We actually are living in "1984" and "Animal Farm". And, yes websites are being taken down and we know that if they return, information will have been altered! It is scary as shit right now, as there is no way out. How in heavens name trump is getting away with his illegal stuff and people accept his lying hateful vitriol spewing from a firehose (my visual) is beyond me. They are as evil as he is!

Expand full comment
L.  Murphy (Albuquerque, NM)'s avatar

Dear Janet - I too cannot understand how people, MAGA supporters in particular, accept the untruths Trump and his minions are putting out. My neighbor voted for Trump and truly believes that Trump is good for the nation and that Trump will straighten the country out once and for all. His attitude boggles the mind.

Expand full comment
Janet W.'s avatar

I have a couple of golfing friends who are trumpsters and are so terribly misinformed (to say nothing of how this man speaks), I am limiting my time with them and may just cut ties altogether and let them know why . . . they clearly don't share my values, don't have a clue what they are talking about, and I have zero respect for them . . . certainly doesn't make for a compatible friendship!!

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

This is my life, L. Murphy. My former work cohort (I've quit calling them friends) are all aboard this garbage that is coming out. Most of them are thrilled with the USAID "waste" they are reporting on, which also includes disinformation they are being fed.

I have had to come to the realization that this is what they want.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Evil describes it best, while claiming the Christian god as their own. Me thinks a surprise may be in store, but they don’t believe their own bull Schitt.

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

From your keyboard to G*d’s screen, Dave.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

They are, and they have political activist liars like Chris Rufo lying about the actual accurate teaching of history. They want to ignore the dark side of our history and pretend it never happened.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

And Texas.

Expand full comment
HarrisWalz FTW 2024's avatar

Figures. Why can't those two states just secede and have their own happy dictator? Leave the rest of us out of it.

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

This raises an issue that, when sanity returns to our government, needs to addressed: the use and abuse of the Executive Order. There needs to be restrictions placed on the use of them. They are not meant to replace, override or supplant existing legislation. They way Trump is using them lays waste to the ideas of separation of powers and the checks and balances built into the Constitution from its inception.

The fact that we have members of the legislative branch who are willing to ignore that and permit Trump run roughshod over the Constitution is beyond deplorable.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Raymond's avatar

Executive Orders are just the beginning. He, or his handlers, also created a new department (DOGE) and staffed it with no Congressional oversight (for what that's worth right now). The unelected, unconfirmed individuals running this department have been given, or seized, tremendous powers, including full access to the US Treasury payment system. I fear this is just the beginning. How many more pseudo-departments will be created, staffed with individuals who are answerable to no one but Trump or his handlers?

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

It's not a new department at all. At one point it was supposed to be attached to the OMB, but now it appears to be working somewhere very near the White House. There are three lawsuits (all filed on 20 January) — one filed by the progressive consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen, another by the pro-democracy organization Democracy Forward and a third by public-interest firm National Security Counselors — that allege that DOGE shouldn’t be considered a federal agency but rather an advisory committee. They argue that not setting up DOGE as an advisory committee violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 which, among other requirements, states that all meetings are public record and that its membership be “fairly balanced” in its points of view. They seem to have now been consolidated by the DoJ into a single lawsuit.

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

Well, I guess he will continue to create them until he has built the government he has obviously designed in his head. I don't really care how delusional he is, just don't inflict it on the rest of us.

Expand full comment
Dave G's avatar

Yes. This is an intentional blitzkrieg to overwhelm the usual administrative, legislative and judicial processes. It takes an army of people to keep up with the orders and how to address them through courts or other avenues.

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Makes me think that we had no plans to counter and far more organization is necessary.

Expand full comment
bruce klassen's avatar

Write to the DNC!

Expand full comment
D4N's avatar

Majority legislature abdicating their duties is the actual problem BobCaster; Restrictions and limitations of effect already exist for the most part.

Expand full comment
John Jennrich's avatar

One, winners write history books. So far, Trump/Musk are winning. Second, they don't care about how history will treat them; they just care about power now.

Expand full comment
Just Sayin''s avatar

isn't that a prerequisite for megalomania?

Expand full comment
Mike Robinson's avatar

The victors always seem to get to rewrite the history books. All the more reason to defeat this fascist takeover of our Federal government. Do you think the world today would generally know about the Holocaust if we hadn't defeated Hitler and his fascists?

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Of course they get to write the history books if they continue to rule us fools. They have been rewriting for decades. School kids have learned some bullschittery in most states. If HCR is writing for the historians in 150 years (I read that somewhere), then it may be what muskrat has approved. Or Putin, or any oligarch even more ruthless. Maybe even HAL, who knows…

Expand full comment
Gene Robertson's avatar

Amen Dr. Richardson. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Betsy Smith's avatar

We are living, temporarily, I hope, in a time when the grass is purple and the sky is orange because the Emperors said that those are the colors of the day. Who knows what colors the grass and the sky will be tomorrow? Who knows how long it will take before the people start believing their own eyes and stop believing the Emperors' lies? I hope that resistance will spread throughout the land of "we, the people" soon, and that will not require the justification of the Second Amendment in order to succeed.

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

This! People have been groomed to ignore their own perceptions and their intuition, their OWN KNOWING, in favor first of religion, then science, and now gaslighting “leaders.” In these times, acting on what we KNOW, while being told we are incorrect, is a revolutionary act.

Expand full comment
Barbara Keating's avatar

In this case, Betsy, even the Emperor is orange 🍊 👑!

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

And we the people are turning red with hanger.

Expand full comment
Evelyn Scolman Lemoine's avatar

This internal coup--or autogolpe as Paul Krugman has labeled it--continues to unfold. We can rejoice that a few judges have stood up for our democracy. But we have to wonder how long they can hold. Especially when there is no movement from the Republicans in Congress. I fear for our country. We've lasted 250 years...let's hope 2025 does not mark the end of our democracy.

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

And even with brave, honest judges, who will enforce their decisions? I fear for our country, too, Evelyn

Expand full comment
Margaret MacKenzie's avatar

Vance, Cotton, Lee, and Gaetz (sheesh, can't he just crawl back under a rock?!) sure didn't gripe about activist judges when their buddies at SCOTUS struck down 50 years of settled law and threw Roe in the garbage heap, along with women's health. Laws suck, don't they, fellas, until they don't.

Expand full comment