I believe that Fox gets most of its revenues from cable subscriptions, not ads. So the best way to choke it is to make it a for-fee optional part of the cable package, like Disney.
Whenever people mention this, though, the MAGAts cry "free speech!" By which they mean "subsidized propaganda." Which is exactly what they claim NPR is. Which,…
I believe that Fox gets most of its revenues from cable subscriptions, not ads. So the best way to choke it is to make it a for-fee optional part of the cable package, like Disney.
Whenever people mention this, though, the MAGAts cry "free speech!" By which they mean "subsidized propaganda." Which is exactly what they claim NPR is. Which, if you look at the issue holistically, makes not a twit of sense. But then, consistent thought isn't a MAGAt attribute.
We have a $24 "broadcast surcharge" on our cable bill now. That's a monthly change for funneling the over-the-air programming into their product. So we are all paying the premium for Fox anyway, even though it's not a premium channel.
I believe that Fox gets most of its revenues from cable subscriptions, not ads. So the best way to choke it is to make it a for-fee optional part of the cable package, like Disney.
Whenever people mention this, though, the MAGAts cry "free speech!" By which they mean "subsidized propaganda." Which is exactly what they claim NPR is. Which, if you look at the issue holistically, makes not a twit of sense. But then, consistent thought isn't a MAGAt attribute.
We have a $24 "broadcast surcharge" on our cable bill now. That's a monthly change for funneling the over-the-air programming into their product. So we are all paying the premium for Fox anyway, even though it's not a premium channel.
That is another good reason to cancel cable, Dish, Direct Tv. I now stream and it is by far less expensive and you download only what you want. NO FOX
I recently read Hoax! Donald Trump, Fox News, and the Dangerous Distortion of Truth by Brian Stelter. Highly readable and eye-opening.