One example - maybe a simple one - is the difference between what the headline shouts out (!) and what the facts (hopefully) of the story are. Sometimes complete opposites. If someone only looks at the headline without reading the story - as I believe many of the DJTs followers do - they never ever "get" the truth. Sadly, thats not just on Faux, or Newsmax.
One example - maybe a simple one - is the difference between what the headline shouts out (!) and what the facts (hopefully) of the story are. Sometimes complete opposites. If someone only looks at the headline without reading the story - as I believe many of the DJTs followers do - they never ever "get" the truth. Sadly, thats not just on Faux, or Newsmax.
One example - maybe a simple one - is the difference between what the headline shouts out (!) and what the facts (hopefully) of the story are. Sometimes complete opposites. If someone only looks at the headline without reading the story - as I believe many of the DJTs followers do - they never ever "get" the truth. Sadly, thats not just on Faux, or Newsmax.
Most of them do those sources!
Agree, Maggie. I would get drawn in by the headline, only to be pointed in another direction once the story unfolds.
oh yes... didn't even think of that. such a part of the process now. think i used to notice and now i usually don't... not a good sign.