And we all benefitted from their endless, baseless attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2016, "But her emails," /s. And here we are the old playbook being recycled.
And we all benefitted from their endless, baseless attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2016, "But her emails," /s. And here we are the old playbook being recycled.
If you really believe that ALL the attacks on Hillary Clinton were baseless, you need to read some real history. Hillary was so vulnerable from many of her positions as both Senator and Secretary of State. She was a terribly weak candidate (I was so stunned when Biden decided to step aside for her, even though voting for a woman was something I was really anxious to do, I just wasn't convinced she was the right one).
John, so you were looking for perfect, huh. Clinton was a very qualified candidate, knew her stuff, and was far superior in every way to "the monster" as you call Trump. I did not see the NYT pushing nearly as hard to point out Trump's total inappropriateness for any office let alone president, then he proved it. There are plenty of folks saying your exact criticisms of Harris right now. Could it be, dare I say it, Misogyny or a fear of women in power? Nah, couldn't be that!
You are accusing me of misogyny? Fear of women in power? What a crock... I campaigned tirelessly for Hilary Clinton, and have been campaigning for Harris as well (in fact that was one of the reasons I hoped Biden would step DOWN because I think Harris who I supported multiple times when she ran in California is a far better candidate that Joe is any more.). Typical nonsense from someone who is too lazy to find their sources and attributions and instead decides to use ad hominem attacks. Neither far nor adult nor really worthy of even the 8 lines I have written in response. Have a nice day.
Your first lines in any message to anyone in this forum is an attack of some form or other. It especially stands out to me that you attack 'women' here (and not all that well either - if they're grading you, you're moving back a grade I'd wager).
If the hat fits wear it, Dude......as for having a nice day? Lighten up, every one of your comments is loaded, loaded with sarcastic, snarly comments and then there is a veracity issue, you " I campaigned tirelessly for Hilary Clinton..." Uh---huh As I said.....ok, let's make it shoe and I suggest you get your foot out of your mouth
If the hat wears it? Good lord... you can't do anything except come up with challenges to my honesty. Wow. Try harder next time (but with someone else, because frankly, despite the great work that HCR does, none of this is worth it).
It's so tiresome to have to respond to misogynistic fools who are so rabidly vehement; one begins to think that the misogynistic writer is, at heart, a basic MAGA idiot. Is Project 2025 your Bible? Your niggling way of responding? Speaks volumes about you, volumes.
And we all benefitted from their endless, baseless attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2016, "But her emails," /s. And here we are the old playbook being recycled.
If you really believe that ALL the attacks on Hillary Clinton were baseless, you need to read some real history. Hillary was so vulnerable from many of her positions as both Senator and Secretary of State. She was a terribly weak candidate (I was so stunned when Biden decided to step aside for her, even though voting for a woman was something I was really anxious to do, I just wasn't convinced she was the right one).
John, so you were looking for perfect, huh. Clinton was a very qualified candidate, knew her stuff, and was far superior in every way to "the monster" as you call Trump. I did not see the NYT pushing nearly as hard to point out Trump's total inappropriateness for any office let alone president, then he proved it. There are plenty of folks saying your exact criticisms of Harris right now. Could it be, dare I say it, Misogyny or a fear of women in power? Nah, couldn't be that!
You are accusing me of misogyny? Fear of women in power? What a crock... I campaigned tirelessly for Hilary Clinton, and have been campaigning for Harris as well (in fact that was one of the reasons I hoped Biden would step DOWN because I think Harris who I supported multiple times when she ran in California is a far better candidate that Joe is any more.). Typical nonsense from someone who is too lazy to find their sources and attributions and instead decides to use ad hominem attacks. Neither far nor adult nor really worthy of even the 8 lines I have written in response. Have a nice day.
Your first lines in any message to anyone in this forum is an attack of some form or other. It especially stands out to me that you attack 'women' here (and not all that well either - if they're grading you, you're moving back a grade I'd wager).
If the hat fits wear it, Dude......as for having a nice day? Lighten up, every one of your comments is loaded, loaded with sarcastic, snarly comments and then there is a veracity issue, you " I campaigned tirelessly for Hilary Clinton..." Uh---huh As I said.....ok, let's make it shoe and I suggest you get your foot out of your mouth
If the hat wears it? Good lord... you can't do anything except come up with challenges to my honesty. Wow. Try harder next time (but with someone else, because frankly, despite the great work that HCR does, none of this is worth it).
It's so tiresome to have to respond to misogynistic fools who are so rabidly vehement; one begins to think that the misogynistic writer is, at heart, a basic MAGA idiot. Is Project 2025 your Bible? Your niggling way of responding? Speaks volumes about you, volumes.
Get a grip, if you're able.
You make good points, but your hostility is weakening your arguments.