The headline is what really counts. Most folks don't read the article.
And they know it.
It's the headline writers I most object too. In terms of being useful and inciteful, it's hard to beat Maggie Haberman.
Unadulterated bs. If anyone does that (only reads the headlines,) that is just their own fault. But obviously YOU don't read the articles or don't care because if you went past the headlines you would see how wrong you are.
Jon --- I said most folks don't read past the headlines. That's a fact.
You have no idea if I read past the headline or not. That's because I never said anything about the contents.
So just admit you were wrong.
And try the decaf.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
The headline is what really counts. Most folks don't read the article.
And they know it.
It's the headline writers I most object too. In terms of being useful and inciteful, it's hard to beat Maggie Haberman.
Unadulterated bs. If anyone does that (only reads the headlines,) that is just their own fault. But obviously YOU don't read the articles or don't care because if you went past the headlines you would see how wrong you are.
Jon --- I said most folks don't read past the headlines. That's a fact.
You have no idea if I read past the headline or not. That's because I never said anything about the contents.
So just admit you were wrong.
And try the decaf.