That's only part of the many options to reduce taxation that are only available to the well off (including me, since my retirement income comes from investments). I think the wealthier you are the more that is true, which is to say nothing of shadowy offshore shenanigans, much of which is "perfectly legal" even though an obvious con. Big…
That's only part of the many options to reduce taxation that are only available to the well off (including me, since my retirement income comes from investments). I think the wealthier you are the more that is true, which is to say nothing of shadowy offshore shenanigans, much of which is "perfectly legal" even though an obvious con. Big corporations do it openly, let alone legally anonymous shell corporations that take a Sherlock Homes to even identify who owns them. It is innately easier for those with money to make disproportionately more, something that the rules should regulate, not accelerate.
That's only part of the many options to reduce taxation that are only available to the well off (including me, since my retirement income comes from investments). I think the wealthier you are the more that is true, which is to say nothing of shadowy offshore shenanigans, much of which is "perfectly legal" even though an obvious con. Big corporations do it openly, let alone legally anonymous shell corporations that take a Sherlock Homes to even identify who owns them. It is innately easier for those with money to make disproportionately more, something that the rules should regulate, not accelerate.