Let's not be too quick to malign and condemn the members of the Arizona Supreme Court. For one thing, they have just done the cause of reproductive rights a tremendous boon.
Further, I am not so sure that the decision is wrong! Given the Dobbs decision and no contrary current legislative declaration of the will of the people in…
Let's not be too quick to malign and condemn the members of the Arizona Supreme Court. For one thing, they have just done the cause of reproductive rights a tremendous boon.
Further, I am not so sure that the decision is wrong! Given the Dobbs decision and no contrary current legislative declaration of the will of the people in 160 years, what other choice did the justices have?
Surely, you do not advocate judges usurping legislative authority.
Mr Cravens:
Let's not be too quick to malign and condemn the members of the Arizona Supreme Court. For one thing, they have just done the cause of reproductive rights a tremendous boon.
Further, I am not so sure that the decision is wrong! Given the Dobbs decision and no contrary current legislative declaration of the will of the people in 160 years, what other choice did the justices have?
Surely, you do not advocate judges usurping legislative authority.
\Vince S
Thank you. Clear brief retort.
I thought AZ had a more recent statute that permitted abortions up to 15 weeks. Why does this relic supersede the more recent statute?
My "Like" is for your sarcasm re. "originalism". You are being sarcastic, right? (The best sarcasm always has a bit of edgy ambiguity.) "Surely" :)
Mr K:
I'll admit to some "edgy ambiguity." Not so sure about the sarcasm. Let's just call it a probing inquiry, à la Socratic discovery.
Sarcasm is too often misused to end conversations. I like to keep conversations going.
\Vince S
that works!
There is a very clear law for. 2022 that they overrode. The choice was clear and they chose partisan hackery.