529 Comments

Your points couldn't be clearer nor more significant.

1. The ACA must endure and be improved upon!

2. Abortion IS a constitutional right!

3. The right wing is/has been embracing authoritarianism!

4. "What's there to oppose in a nod to democratic values and diplomacy when Ukraine" is defending itself "against an invasion and brutal occupation."

5. The resolution to affirm the House's "unequivocal support" for NATO is a must!

6. The 63 Republicans should be ashamed of themselves!

I stand in favor of all the above!

Expand full comment

The 63 Republicans are the lead traitors.

Expand full comment

I looked up my Republican former marine Lt. General seditionist, Rep. Jack Bergman, and found he voted FOR the resolution, which might mean his Democratic opposition is having an impact and/or tRump is losing his hold on the party? Here's the list of "Nays":

https://mobile.twitter.com/mkraju/status/1511450233095569411?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1511450233095569411%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-3436626717505448391.ampproject.net%2F2203172113000%2Fframe.html

Expand full comment

If Jack Bergman is coming to even a smidgeon of sense, I will be grateful while also totally stunned. I lived in the U.P. when he was elected, and I know that none of the letters my husband and I wrote to him seemed to have any affect. May you and the rest of the Democratic opposition not lose heart!

Expand full comment

Bergman is a carpet bagger (in reverse), bought a cabin in the U.P. to run for office, lives in Louisiana. We have an EXCELLENT Democratic candidate for Congress this year, Dr. Bob Lorinser from Marquette, MI! Not only 30 years providing medical care, he and his wife served in the U.S. Foreign Service for 10 years!

https://www.votedrbob.com/allaboutbob

Expand full comment

Donating to Dr Bob & his savy Team. Soliciations double as informative updates on his campaign as Dr Bob covers both MI peninsulas.

Expand full comment

Wonderful!!! Thank You Bryan!!

Expand full comment

I’m not surprised to see Gaetz listed here. In other news yesterday I heard his stupidity on full display as he tried to gut our Defense Secretary on “wokeness”. He did everything in his power to try and suggest racial slurs on Defense Institute policies. Made my blood boil! What will it take for these creeps to be stopped from their tryouts for Faux News air time?

Expand full comment

I saw where Gaetz's reasoning for voting against lowering the cost of insulin for diabetics was that they needed to lose weight. Such a nice man.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/04/05/matt-gaetz-insulin-cost-increases-waistlines/9467445002/

Expand full comment

Gaetz and Cawthorn must be. bruthas from another mutha! These boys definitely don’t belong in anywhere near Congress. They belong in pre-school where they are given the basics of being nice.

Expand full comment

:: Head explodes in fury ::

Expand full comment

I will mention that to my in-law, whose type 2 diabetes was causing him to lose 10% of his weight each year, which had been normal when first diagnosed. After a few years it was inject insulin or waste away.

Expand full comment

Which shows his abysmal ignorance about diabetes. I know too many insulin-dependent diabetics for whom obesity was never a factor.

Expand full comment

Watching that guy giving Gen. Austin (not to mention Secretary) a nasty time, The word sophistry came to mind. Also, 'punk'

Expand full comment

I confess my thoughts were much darker.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Gaetz is a poster boy for a large swath of Amurca.

That is a problem.

Expand full comment

I also watched that clip. Although Gaetz's questioning was ridiculous and uncivil, I didn't think Sec. Austin acquitted himself very well, at least partially because Gaetz wouldn't let him speak. But Austin's answers seemed pretty wishy-washy to me. In answer to why Picketty was allowed to speak at the War College, the obvious answer is that Picketty is one of the leading scholars in the world and it's important to hear all interesting ideas at an elite academic institution. Of course, Picketty's lecture had nothing to do with the withdrawal from Afghanistan or any of the other issues Gaetz mentioned. And Austin could have noted, with regard to N. Korea, that despite Trump's assertion that "the nuclear problem was solved" (because he and Kim had fallen in love), N. Korea had moved ahead with their nukes program, largely out of control of the U.S. Did Gaetz think we should have nuked N. Korea? (Think? Gaetz?)

Expand full comment

My Rep, Tim Burchett, voted no. I’ll tell ya, in Congress Tennesseans got nothing.

Expand full comment

Good to see Oregon's only Republican Congressperson vote yes on this no-brainer piece of legislation 🙂

Expand full comment

I'm more worried about the GOP state legislators in Tennessee, who have proposed eliminating minimum age requirements for marriage. It's now 17. In other words, they want to allow children to marry. https://www.newsweek.com/tennessee-bill-proposes-eliminating-marriage-age-requirements-1695209

Expand full comment

Just makes it easier for those men in TN to get their child porn at home and in the neighborhood. Let's see if we hear any concerns from Josh Hawley, Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Lindsay Graham, and Marsha Blackburn (who said she was so concerned about children while trying to paint Judge Jackson as easy on people who collect and share it). Can you picture those 14 year old girls getting pregnant and having no way to avoid annual repetitions? The life expectancy and quality of life will be less than dogs that are kept for only breeding purposes.

Expand full comment

No kidding!! Blackburn…hold me back from strangling the living daylights outta her!

Expand full comment

Yikes!

The fact that such mandates could even be conceived by the elected representative of TN constituency is so very repulsive proves that the native characters depicted in the movie Deliverance are actually those people who have been elected to public office by those very same totally bizarre inter-bred "people"

Side Bar:

The "actor" in Deliverance who so infamously yelled, "...squeal like a pig..." was, in fact not acting at all!

And I believe he remains, even today, as the duly elected republican Governor of TN

Expand full comment

You wrote "In other words, they want to allow children to marry." Actually, what they want is to allow adult men to marry children. We all know that it won't be adult women marrying male children. Nor is it likely that many children in question will be given choice in the matter.

Expand full comment

I meant what you wrote. Thanks for clarifying.

Expand full comment

I believe that new legislation is referred to as the Tennessee licentiously lasciviousness pedophile's public predispositioned proclamation for perverts bill. Eh!?

Expand full comment

Agree. Thanks for clarifying.

Expand full comment

😪😰🤢🤮🤢😰😪 ... this too must pass ...!!

Expand full comment

OH! Yes!

That bill has come to my attention.

I believe it is called the Tennessee licentiously lasciviousness pedophile's public predispositioned proclamation for perverts bill.

Expand full comment

EGADS!! Child abuse and pedophilia will increase in Tennessee. Evangelicals have nothing else to do but to destroy young people’s lives?

Expand full comment

And they want to remove any bars on gun totin’. And make TN public schools charter schools, under the direction of Hillsdale College from MI (bc apparently TN universities don’t have the expertise). HC is a fave of the DeVos family.

Expand full comment

Which explains a lot of the ignorance and lack of knowledge in too many of our poorer, southern states. With all the inpouring of federal tax support (accumulated from taxes collected in higher income/educated states) I have to wonder why we try.

Expand full comment

YIKES...hell on Earth, Eh!?

Expand full comment

Most of America daily prays that Tennesseans some how begin to comprehend the direct negative consequences of their negative voting history...that they actually realize the good they choose to deprive themselves instead of consistently voting, (or not voting at all, ever), to remain enslaved in the R's trumpeting hell!

It remains incomprehensible why A SCUM BAG like Burchett could even be elected to the urinal duty janitorial position of Tennessee's prison.

Expand full comment

Simply, because he has an R after his name.

Expand full comment

Watching and listening to Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) during Judge Jackson's committee hearings, and now the TN proposal to allow girls to marry at age 14 makes me wonder about the mental capacity of that state. Legislation to obtain their child porn easier, seems to me. I'll be waiting to hear how concerned Josh Hawley, Tom Cotton, Lindsay Graham, Tom Cruz, and Ms. Blackburn are about that situation. I expect absolute silence.

Expand full comment

Ha! Ha! Did anyone accuse him of being soft on child pornography?

Expand full comment

Actually, the TN proposal has no minimum age limit. Saw an exchange earlier today in the legislature between a legislator and a proponent which made this clear.

Expand full comment

Make sure your fellow Tennesseans know and vote him out of office. I've been a loud voice posting facts against representatives/one senator in my state who need to be out of office.

Expand full comment

Boebert is not representing my district, but I am ashamed for Colorado

Expand full comment

Thanks for list of nays, MaryPat Sercu. I am not surprised that Trump supporter Scott Perry is on that list. Perry is my PA 10th District Representative. Guess what, he's a retired U.S. Army Brigadier General. He also is one of those who signed and continues to believe the Joe Biden stole the election from Perry's god Trump. What kind of soldier and patriot is Scott Perry? He must be defeated.

Expand full comment

SP diagnosed "Shell Shock" derived from a diet consisting entirely of roasted salted southern nuts...

Expand full comment

Note that Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise and Elise Stefanik voted FOR the resolution.

Expand full comment

I guess I made a bit of progress moving to MO because my rep, Wagner, voted in favor while my old rep from IN-9, Hollingsworth, voted against. Another good reason not to enable or tolerate carpetbaggers who only move to get a seat. Thanks for posting the list MaryPat.

Expand full comment

Having been in the military may have been the one and only reason, MaryPat.

Expand full comment

That's what I am thinking Fern. No cause to celebrate here. He must go.

Expand full comment

That's the spirit, MaryPat. When and if a Democrat influences a Republican that will be the day; If it does happen once in while, I'd like to know about it. No one influences Manchin and Sinema, they know who they're servicing; it's called self-serving.

Expand full comment

Our Dem candidate IS really giving Bergman a run for his (blood) money though. More and more I am seeing local candidates (county commissioner, state rep) announcing they are "moderate Republicans." Which is code for "not trumpers." I know these folks from working on other boards with them, and they are decent people. Feels like the tide is turning away from the orange thug, if only in rural northern Michigan.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I had not seen your post before I requested the list!

Expand full comment

The challenge facing our democracy is the fact that these Republicans were legitimately elected by their constituents, as were most of their party who, as HCR puts it today, are engaged in culture wars which are 'pushing today’s right wing toward authoritarianism,' including taking away the health care that the ACA has brought to many Americans. This is the Achilles heel of a democracy that allows the election of people who are intent on destroying it. How do we meet that challenge?

Expand full comment

I have to add that we must question "legitimacy" these days. There is so much propaganda, voter suppression and rigging that I don't believe very much of anything today.

Expand full comment

Being saddled with a bad Congress critter is like being in a bad marriage. People must realize that they get to be who they are, that no one can force them to accept being anyone else. Divorce that critter.

Expand full comment

Jack...

Actually the FACT is the republicans during the last thirty years have NEVER been legitimately elected.

Gerrymandering, targeted voter suppression state legislation, Citizens United dark money, bastardization of historical facts in schools, etc., etc., etc.

The R's are crooks, that can only lie, greedy, their god is the dollar bill, those who control the R's can only be white, bigoted, moneyed, old, gluttonous men enslaved by the Great Deceiver to destroy American democracy instilling authoritarianism rule.

For example look at what weaseled his way into the Florida representative chair:

Matt Gaetz is the R's poster boy, as a child molester & close associate of the former king of molesters Epstein...

Expand full comment

But Gaetz was elected by those in his district. And though we disagree with its results, gerrymandering is legal, following State laws. As for Citizens United, the SCOTUS said its contributions are legal, as if they came from individuals, protected by the First Amendment.

All that you recognize as evil was accomplished legally, including Florida's new statutes, effective 7/1, limiting reference to gender issues in schools and giving parents input as to what books are permitted there and how history is taught. Democracy has its Achilles' heels at which Republicans aim their arrows ... with existing law to back them up! With luck, we'll end up with a benevolent autocracy to replace our flawed democracy which is destroying itself.

Expand full comment

Jack!

Wow!

We will NEVER agree.

BUT!

I will never give up protecting the freedom & equal rights of EVERY American in these United States of America!

I must say that the methodology of deception used by the R's nationwide to manipulate the gerrymandered surgically sliced voter boundaries to prevent the increasing homogenization of NON-WHITE populations into fairly representative geographical areas.

This increasing trend is diluting the voting power of the historically populated areas of the lily-whites now, more and more, living in fear of becoming the minority and loss of their misplaced self-appointed superiority over non-white people. The inhuman cruelty inflicted by whites upon nonwhites is ending and such reality is unimaginable to the R's,

Eh!?

Jack.

Expand full comment

Of course I agree with you. But that's why local voting for State legislators is crucial. They are the ones who make gerrymandering legal in their State, and this SCOTUS isn't likely to interfere with them. Tip O'Neill said that "all politics are local" and it's true today.

Expand full comment

"The R's are crooks, that can only lie, greedy, their god is the dollar bill, those who control the R's can only be white, bigoted, moneyed, old, gluttonous men enslaved by the Great Deceiver to destroy American democracy instilling authoritarianism rule."

Absolutely the best sentence of the entire MONTH!

:-)

Expand full comment

INDEED!?

Expand full comment

This, George, I can agree with!

Expand full comment

Attempted like

Expand full comment

The scary part is that they are so obvious.

Expand full comment

Obvious to you, obvious to me, but their constituents actually believe what they're doing and saying is the truth. They area validating "Brave New World" and "1984."

Expand full comment

Or their constituents don’t care or pay attention even when they are the victims of policies that negatively affect them. Or they believe the lies of their representatives.

Expand full comment

Or perhaps they've given up, living in places where they can't see what difference their votes make. A lot of people are expending most of their energy just trying to get by, make a living, stay out of trouble that's looking for them (not the other way round). So easy for too many of us to look down on them, because we can't see the path they walk. If we can't here them, what hope is there that the people who supposedly "represent" them can?

Expand full comment

Too true Annie ...

Expand full comment

Yes, can’t hear and can’t see. There is that saying, “I see you.” And hear you. We are often in other worlds in the same room. And then there’s “the room where it happened” and happens. You do have a point. And TFG spoke directly to some of them.

Expand full comment

Annie:

I, like a majority of American voters do understand the plight of the underprivileged and pray for ways to make America the home of the free EQUALLY for all Americans.

It seems that, "... they can't see what difference their votes make..." is because they have voted into office republican bigoted idiots like mat gaetz, marjorie T. greene, lauren boebert, etc., etc., etc.

Voting intelligently this November 8, by taking the time required to KNOW & UNDERSTAND the legislative issues, incumbents, and candidates will substantially improve the quality of their living life.

DO IT!

NOW!!

Expand full comment

most don't even vote, ever...

Expand full comment

Both of those books were required reading during my junior and senior years (1980-82) in the Chicago public high school I attended, and I often consider the eerie similarities at play today, with the added horror of having seen and experienced all the double-speak/standard women further have had to contend with. Much work to do!

Expand full comment

😢

Expand full comment

Diana, I’ve referenced those two treasures many times in the last months. We are in times so surreal that when people say, “Stranger than Fiction” I think about the predictions of books and authors who really do see into the future. Now.

Expand full comment

Some Republicans are undoubtedly so bereft of meaning in their lives that it will put them in a happy place to be able to say they never once voted with the Democrats.

They are a classic and potentially tragic beacon for the adage that you can’t distribute poison unless you have it in you.

Expand full comment

Just remember, they not only follow Trump they follow Mitch McConnell who has vowed to obstruct everything Biden proposes just as he vowed to obstruct Obama. Unless voters realize that the battle cannot be won with just one election in 2020, every election determines how many troops are recruited for the next confrontation. Look at these parents being cultivated to undermine elected school boards. City Councils are training grounds for state legislatures, etc. Citizenship is not just a border issue. It is a long-term responsibility requiring constant attention to what is happening and where.

Expand full comment

Under-rated comment. The movement has admittedly spread perniciously and is clearly plumbing the lowest depths of people’s beings.

Being alert to it all ruins one’s psyche and health.

Being aware that you feel a certain numbness after a while is alarming and dispiriting.

At the macro level, that’s why we desperately need a DOJ that understands this and is working furiously to indict obviously guilty and *highly recognizable* figures. Besides the legal implications, a few sturdy convictions would have a chilling impact on those who feel invulnerable.

My heart cares only a little bit that 750 cases have been made agains riot participants.

My morale and energy would soar if say, a Mark Meadows and a Matt Gaetz were convicted and imprisoned. For a start.

It’s an old ticker and getting a Trump conviction might push me into heart attack territory. 😊

Serious point though. Unless things change, we are going to surrender to the authoritarians simply because we lost morale and they feel they’ve hootenanny away like bandits. An Orban-style “democracy” looms on the near horizon.

Expand full comment

I have a neighbor like that. Been backyard neighbors for over 25 years. We haven’t spoken in 2 1/2 years and that’s okay with me.

Expand full comment

I have next door neighbors who fit that deplorable description. If you can’t say something nice…

Expand full comment

I think it would help if we could set the word "deplorable" aside altogether. Then nobody would feel the need to alude to that.old saying and leave the end off, pretending not to have said anything.

Expand full comment

Good point…taken.

Expand full comment

This is no surprise, but it's maddening nonetheless.

"When asked to choose between protecting their country or domestic extremists, every single Republican on the House Judiciary Committee chose the extremists." Every. Single. One.

https://www.politicususa.com/2022/04/06/every-single-house-judiciary-committee-republican-votes-against-bill-to-fight-domestic-terrorism.html?fbclid=IwAR1O6kGRT4Bm9G1w9HFgwjw7ApioQvWAFzwVOf-0xDSDlpgHi8A3Qhp3I7A

Expand full comment

They're taking care of their voters.

Expand full comment

And of their corporate contributors.

Expand full comment

Who are they? Names.

Expand full comment

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that there is overlap with the list Patti posted below of 63 Republicans Representatives who voted against the defense of NATO an democracy bill, and this bill a year ago against Anti-Asian Hate Crimes Bill, again 63 Republican Representatives. https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-63-republicans-who-voted-against-anti-asian-hate-crimes-bill-1593542

Expand full comment

This is important. I wonder how many other votes have the same 63. Is this the infamous Sedition Caucus I wonder? Or just the House side of the bunch.

Expand full comment

WOW. I hadn't thought of that - or noticed.

Expand full comment

I am now going to be looking at the Office of the Clerk of House of Representatives more often to see how people are voting. https://clerk.house.gov/Votes

Expand full comment

Thanks.

Expand full comment

Cheney did not vote?

Expand full comment

This list is of people who voted AGAINST supporting defense by NATO. Cheney voted for, as did some other Republicans.

Expand full comment

MaryPat posted a link with the names of the 63 traitors. See above. I had asked the same question before I saw her post.

Expand full comment

My representative Doug LaMalfa voted NO on this resolution. I live in a blue bubble surrounded by rural red. We've tried to replace him, but haven't yet.

Expand full comment

Those are the authoritarians in our midst. Who let the dogs out?

Expand full comment

Rowshan,

I would be more in favor of Health Care entirely run and managed and paid for by the government, like Canada, at this point than the mishmash of corporate greed and high costs that the ACA and our current approach provide to us.

For example, an MD here gets paid a LOT more than their counterparts world wide and our health outcomes are often worse.

https://www.beckersasc.com/benchmarking/how-physician-pay-in-the-us-compares-to-other-countries-11-findings.html#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20physicians%20in%20the,their%20counterparts%20in%20other%20countries.

The overall system problem in health care is not just extending coverage to people who did not have it before.

The whole health care system is focussed on maximizing management bonuses for Insurance company executives and making sure the AMA continues to pay off the people in Congress that keep MD salaries high.

For example, NAFTA sold out all skill in America for outsourcing (engineering especially) EXCEPT Doctors were not permitted to be outsourced in that agreement because the AMA paid off a bunch of Congress people to keep Doc's out of that lower cost doom loop.

So, an MD in Mexico cannot take the job from an MD here.

But, an engineer in Mexico certainly can.

The ACA did nothing to lower health care costs for Americans. In fact, for working Americans (see my other post) it INCREASED total cost through increased premiums.

The systemic problems in health care are not addressed by the ACA. Just one tiny bit of the problem (somewhat extended coverage) is addressed.

That (important) component is important but fawning over the ACA too much obscures the real structural problems in America's health care system.

AND NOW, as I write??? We, the US are allowing HEDGE FUNDS to buy up all of our hospitals. YEP, all across America, Hedge funds, those same entities that completely destroyed American manufacturing here, are now buying hospitals.

Let's see how that works out for us. $1000 per stitch the next time you cut your finger?

So, let's not lose sight of the huge problem that exists in the USA around health care relative to sane countries like Greece, Canada, and England and Norway and Sweden and.....welll.......the list is long.

Expand full comment

When it comes to health care in the US, competing ideas can be true at the same time. I agree with many of your points. Our health care system is indeed a corporate wreck. We would be much better off with a full national health care system like those in Israel, Canada, etc. At the same time, as long as we don’t have the political ability to create that, improvements like the ACA are lifesaving for millions of people including my own brother.

Expand full comment

I have a friend who was about 4 years short of Medicare when she left her job, and it saved her.

Expand full comment

Lots of folks have benefitted from ACA.

Expand full comment

Mike. I have. Had it not been for umbrella coverage when I left a job several years ago. I would not have coverage. Given I have several pre-existing illnesses, including cancer, I wouldn't be here today.

Expand full comment

Count me in that group. The ACA allowed me to retire before Medicare would kick in. And I really needed to retire!!

Expand full comment

Looks like it Is becoming a matter of how to survive until becoming eligible for Medicare. ACA helped, as mentioned above, but don't forget that those who are attacking that legislation also have Medicare itself in their crosshairs. Things may get worse before they get better, at which point those who consistently vote for opponents of democracy will have recognized that they've been hoodwinked.

Expand full comment

Not to speak for Mike, but he was responding to an earlier statement that ACA itself should be expanded and built on. I agree: the ACA is a lifesaver when no other resource is available. But the built-in loopholes and the fatal flaw (focus on private insurance companies), result of unfortunate "compromises" (needed to get something past the reactionary right) makes it a poor scaffold for developing a truly effective national health care system. ACA is what we've got now and it has brought us closer to that ideal (it helped save my brother's life, too, and one of my adult children). Yes, we do need to ensure that it continues. But we urgently need to start now to build a more integrated and less fragmented health care system with real safeguard against the abuses that are still part of the system.

My brother should not have had to risk bankruptcy while fighting the piecemeal system we have, with billing systems so complex they are unmanageable ON TOP OF trying to manage his treatments. for stage 4b cancer that was first discovered in his brain (and led to a long series of radical treatments. There's a whole story there, but that much gives an idea of what people go through. My brother made it, and still has his house, but oh, god, no body should have to go through that. He was lucky in having an oncologist who fought for him, both medically and helping him negotiate the financial and insurance hoops.

We have to change that. Speaking just for myself, but knowing that many people experience this: For an outpatient surgery, I got different bills for almost every different prodecure involved, because of contracting out. Holy cow. I am with a different system now, and though they also use contractors (necessity for small hospitals without means to have all services on site), they have made arrangements to roll those in with hospital charges (not hidden - they are clearly identified, but not separate). This is a small local example of "single payer", which is widely misunderstood. There are many ways to structure how single payer works, including some that include private insurance. But they all include universal health care, and eliminate the economic stress of becoming ill or having an accident. AHC is a spot holder, but its biggest contribution is, I think, helping people understand that universal health care is a positive public good, not something that takes away choice.

Expand full comment

Health Care must be an American right...not a cost. No American must suffer not having good universal health care!

Expand full comment

That is not yet a consensus in the US. When it is, a rational medical and healthcare delivery national system can go forward. Germany or Australia have good models for the US

Expand full comment

This should have occurred 200 years ago!

Expand full comment

Thank you for your expanded comment and clarity around the issue.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Annie, for your excellent comment on the importance of building a system that meets real human needs, in place of the present smokescreen of ideological abstractions that mask unbridled greed while destroying livelihoods and lives.

But a fair healthcare system must be so devised as to bolster individual responsibilit and avoid abusive dependence.

Not an easy balancing act.

But then, devising and maintaining living, parasite-free institutions can never be an easy act.

Expand full comment

individualism, independence, mutual respect, wisdom, compassion, Love.

Expand full comment

Including all of those with pre-existing conditions who were unable to get medical insurance coverage pre-ACA.

Expand full comment

Agree.

Expand full comment

Please don’t blame MDs for rising healthcare costs. Most of them are also pawns in this corrupt game between insurance companies, for profit hospital groups, pharmaceutical companies, and the government.

Expand full comment

amk.

I am observing a fact that MD's are paid very, very well and especially when comparing US MD's to Canadian and other countries with effective health care for everyone.

Observing one of the components of overall cost, MD talent, is not bad. And, for example, Anesthesiologists routinely make upward of $400,000 per year in the US.

MD's are also protected from being outsourced to India or Mexico or wherever in most cases.

The total cost of health care is made up of many components. Management bonuses at Insurance companies, profit, expensive equipment AND MD pay.

So, that is not blaming. That is just observing.

Expand full comment

I have a daughter who, years ago, paid top dollar for medical school and then had seven years afterwards where, quite frequently, she was obliged to fill in for a nursing shortages. Until she was about 35, her top gross income was $34,000 a year.

Fortunately we were able to pay for her med school and provide a cushion during her years of residency and specialization. She got married and later had three children after she was able to practice medicine. Many others are burdened with a massive debt.

Expand full comment

I know. I have a relative who had 3 children by the time he graduated from law school and the loan "agencies" just piled on interest and then compounded that. After providing documentation and correspondence showing the errors being made by the "agencies" he just gave up. I expect he will die and leave the unpaid debt and no one will fault him.

Expand full comment

I notice just how much (how little) everyone seems to be paid when costs are charged to Medicare. It is no wonder people in some places find it near impossible to locate doctors who will take Medicare patients. Between the paperwork required and the pittance paid it is difficult to understand how medical school loans are ever paid off.

Expand full comment

Any newly minted MD can sign up for the National Health Service Corps, spend 3 years in a medically underserved area and get a $100K repayment of med school debt.

Expand full comment

Nothing is free in this mans' free world.

Expand full comment

Sure.

Those poor docs NEED their 2nd & 3rd vacation mansions with year round staffing, humongous boats, expensive snooty private clubs, etc., etc., etc. Eh!?

Expand full comment

Lots of good docs out there. But, lots of them up here do have Lake Houses worth millions.

Expand full comment

And lots of them don't.

Expand full comment

The systemic problem is bigger than healthcare. For example, most US doctors pay the full freight of the seven plus years of college education with large, hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans at higher interest rates. Plus they go through three years of residency at modest wages and long hours. This drives if not requires doctors to seek highest paid positions which are in our more prosperous cities.

Compare this with Cuba and many nations where medical students attend at free tuition and housing assistance enabling them to graduate and start working with no debt. Then these nations pay doctors all effectively the same regardless of where they work and live. This promotes doctors to work in either urban or rural areas with regard to income. And hospital and clinics in other nations are more evenly invested in for more equal quality facilities.

We are designed to fail.

Expand full comment

Docs in Germany also emit having paid nothing. They emit into a highly effective German health care system where health care is also free.

And, yes, our health care system, at least my own limited experience in it, is pretty foul.

I once hauled, together with three other guys, around 1300 bales of hay, 80lbs each, right before I went to college. My left side started hurting pretty bad the day after we were done.

I spent the next two years going to 12 different docs asking each of them if maybe I had hernia (no lie, no exaggeration). After many horrible tests and Xrays that were, not needed, and all the docs scratching their head in puzzlement......

I finally went to an old country surgeon in Austin, TX and asked him to cut me open and just have a look.

He laughed and said "Stand on this stool". "Turn your head and cough".

"Young man, you have a big old hernia down there. We can fix you up at your next Christmas Break".

TRUE story without a lot of the details. This odyssey cost me and my family around 3500 dollars BEFORE the surgery back when my entire college edcuation cost $10k.

My subsequent encounters with health care have not been better or more encouraging.

Now? I just diagnose myself and walk in and tell my Doc what the issue is. Then, if he wants to disagree, he can, but, I don't let them flail around.

Expand full comment

The thing that burns me most about health care in America. Go to the doctor, Dr says “what’s the matter? (Translation: Diagnose yourself)” then the facility charges you over a hundred dollars (at least) for his asking the question and agreeing with your best guess!

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

Another reason why travel and education are critical. To learn and know that USA is not number one. I’ve needed healthcare in countries outside of USA and often had no bill for excellent and timely services. The idea that USA leads the world is another delusion. We need to work to continually improve. Not wave flags.

Expand full comment

Same here, Irenie. Our family has often sought medical care in Italy, from emergencies with our kids, through cast care for a broken arm for a kiddo including X-rays, through minor surgery for me. Our cost for all of this: zero. And we are not participants in ASL, the Italian health system. It’s funny, Italian provincial hospitals look impossibly old fashioned, not fancy at all. But the health care is outstanding, even on a remote island. I’m not talking about just Rome and Milan.

Further, the same is true about Italian schools. They have a national curriculum, not a million local ones. When our kids were in Italian schools, it was clear to me that Italian kids are two years ahead of their American counterparts, and they have one more year of high school than we do. They have access to trade schools for kids who don’t want to go to university. And university itself is very inexpensive.

And this is Italy, not on anyone’s list of the best-governed, most efficient countries in the world. We are doing it wrong.

Expand full comment

I was once chatting with my neighbor congressman, talking about our kids’ broken arms, and mentioned what happened to him in Italy with his cast care. His wife’s response: weren’t you terrified to have to get health care there? Umm, no. It’s a developed country with better life expectancy and health outcomes than ours. His response: how can they do that for free? Congressman, they have universal health care there… If those making decisions and legislating on these issues are so ignorant, what hope do we have?

Expand full comment

So interesting. Travel is essential. Some Americans must think every country outside the USA is what they would consider a third world country. Ha! Many Americans would disagree and some purposely cross the borders for care. Or are lucky to travel and see for themselves.

Expand full comment

We are both blessed and cursed by our geographic isolation. It’s expensive for Americans to travel, and our own country has so much to offer. It’s not like in Europe, where you can drive a few hours and enter a place with a different language and culture. I know this shows my Eurocentric bias, but it’s the continent I know best after our own. I don’t know what it’s like for Asians, South Americans, or Africans. I imagine that for Australians, it’s just like we are.

Expand full comment

Maybe, just maybe, since we’re not really United, we’re just too big. It’s as if the South has decided to secede from the Union again. But this time they want to keep what they like and sabotage or dump what they don’t. Hmmm…long list. Civil Rights, Women’s Rights, Voting Rights.. education in jeopardy, climate. Health care? I bet they like a policy when it helps them. Or maybe they aren’t attentive enough to know. At one point many citizens didn’t want “Obamacare” but ACÁ was ok. Epidemic of ignorance.

And government? Maybe “they” seceded and I wasn’t paying attention.

Expand full comment

I've also wondered if we've gotten too big to function with any kind of effectiveness or humanity. Sometimes I daydream about the west coast states being a separate country --don't jump all over me, please -- I said daydream. I know it won't happen; I know there are good reasons for it not to happen. But the thought lingers. . . .

Expand full comment

If you do, I’ll move there in a heartbeat.

Expand full comment

It’s not just the south, sadly. Yesterday, here in Ohio, the legislature considered our very own don’t say gay bill. If Roe is overturned, I expect abortion to become illegal in Ohio. I have two LGBTQ kids who live in the state and this just makes my blood boil. Which it would, even if it weren’t personal, but it is.

Expand full comment

Thank you, dear KR, for reminding our classmates “it’s not just the south.” Many of us LFAA subscribers who comment regularly and come here for democratic nourishment live — some born and raised — “down here.”

Additionally, I too have an LGBTQ kid and other family members. My blood boils with yours.

Expand full comment

The South is not a monolith, and any one who follows what's going on down there can see the many voices and forces straining against each other (yes, race, but many other factors as well, poverty, a failed education system, all the things you list, Irenie). A self-selected group of "elites" are using well-worn techniques to maintain control of voting access and that makes it seem like what they are doing is an inevitability. Right wing elements in other states are using similar tactics. I don't believe it is inevitable. Take a hard look at any of those states: even in mainstream media, you can see the evidence of change. It just ain't going away.

It occurs to me that as any assemblage is beginning a change from one state of being to another, there is a period of what seems like chaos, but could as easily be a normal sorting out of priorities, on a massive scale. I admit to being very concerned about where we are right now. It didn't begin with Trump and the pandemic: it's obviously been going on for a long while.

But changes in American society are profound right now because of the influence of those two additional factors. Neither of them are as simple as they are treated by much of the media or by our own attempts to make them things we can wrap our minds around (I struggle with that- but the complexity of the consequences and our responses still boggles me).

This isn't a regional issue. And in most places it isn't even a straight-forward "state's rights" issue. We all know that so-called state's rights actually refer to the power of that elite. And yet in all of those states, there is pushback that can be built on. No state is fully "blue", and none is fully "red". We have to give up that misconception, and one way to do it is to call out media when they treat what is happening through that very narrow lens. Ditto politicians riding that trope. We speak out loudly and insistently, but with clarity and calm. Name-calling and judgement are not useful tools: they backfire every time. Think: how would you feel if just the fact that you are associated with certain concepts meant that you are automatically considered ignorant or uneducated, or incapable of having an opinion that might be rational within your circumstances? Would you feel like exploring ways to find common ground or exploring how labels limit discussion? My guess is nope. But that is what we are doing everyday on this forum, and in the papers and other places of public discourse.

I am feeling more optimistic right now, because I am seeing some of those things being talked about openly and with compassion. On both sides. The thing we need to resist is the temptation to walk away, to "secede" from the conversation. We have to be willing to set aside our own discomfort (and fear), so we can hear what underlies the thing we most fear.

Expand full comment

Listening to each other is a place to start. Especially knowing the diversity of this nation and the impossibility/futility of categorizing people by geography and/or political beliefs. So secession isn’t the answer. Nothing that simple. I say in jest.

Expand full comment

This time we let them go and forget about it.

Expand full comment

Same in Greece. That is why Greece has a stable Democracy. Greeks are well read and schooled in critical thinking. Even the ones way out in the villages.

Expand full comment

KR, it seems USA is too big, too diverse to meet the needs of all citizens. I’ve always thought it unwise and inaccurate to compare school and other systems in small countries that have much smaller and more homogeneous populations with our system that covers not only so many different states and areas, but the huge and diverse population. I hear “Why can’t USA be like xxxx?” Finland, Denmark etc. Not likely. Every state added to the Union presented unique problems and challenges, from geography to country of origin, section of country, language, religion or none, and then more than two bigger challenges we have not met: First People here first!!! And people brought to America as slaves, stolen from their own homes and countries. Or another: not Christian. There’s more of course. But there’s not enough understanding, compassion and empathy, respect and acceptance for differences and similarities. It’s always been here, but TFG helped bring intolerance out in the open. He’s made it ok to hate. We are so challenged to find ways to connect, to accept, share and above all to care. But we must continue to try! Onward!

Expand full comment

We will praise ourselves to death.

Expand full comment

A recent text from a dear friend of mine:

"Just got this bill for my ER visit. $969 cut in half and paid by Blue Cross. My copay is $50. I was there for an hour and treatment consisted of re-gluing an incision that opened and bled. Unbelievable!

Expand full comment

"The systemic problems in health care are not addressed by the ACA. Just one tiny bit of the problem (somewhat extended coverage) is addressed."

Remember who was responsible for hamstringing the ACA in the first place. Remember its original ambitions.

Expand full comment

As well. Preceeded by 50 years (in my time working) of diddling with everything except what would help (a) bend the curve for spiraling health costs, (b) pave the way for increased access to health care (including medical services) for all Americans, and (c) improve the health status and longevity of America's people, regardless of their economic or social status. My wording, but the essential intents in launching the Affordable Care Act, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. As enacted, the ACA, got stopped at increased coverage to slow spiraling costs by increasing the size of the risk pool and establishing a means for insurance companies to not go bankrupt if they head high proportions of risky insurees. That's also what Mr Obama and Mr Biden refer to as building upon the ACA and it's progenitor, the Massachusetts Health Care model (a conservative idea and model) in place when Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts.

(https://pnhp.org/news/the-fundamental-flaws-in-the-massachusetts-and-aca-model/)

Expand full comment

As I understand it, even under ACA, states can set up their own alternative healthcare insurance systems. It’s probably time to get to work on Plan B if we really believe the Republicans will repeal the ACA.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I like Kotlikoff’s Purple Plan. It does a lot more than cut administrative costs. It caps cost at 10 or 11% of GDP. It should be attractive to Republicans because Democrats haven’t endorsed it (yet). https://www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2017/01/18/the-republicans-healthcare-answer-the-purple-health-plan/

Expand full comment

The ACA did 4 hugely significant things for Americans: kids may stay on their parents’ plan to age 26. Eliminated gender-based insurance rates (women paid more). Eliminated lifetime caps on health insurance. Eliminated denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Expand full comment

Also, the income based subsidies made it possible for many people to pay their now-low premium and still have some cash to pay deductibles - people who previously could not afford care.

Expand full comment

And the hedge funds often sells the land the hospital sits on. No more local hospital.

Expand full comment

Actually real estate investment trusts (REITs) are the publicly traded companies that buy and sell land and hospitals in America.

Expand full comment

So creepy. Donated by local farmers 100 years ago...

Expand full comment

And Medicare MUST be continued and improved upon. After earning my master's degree, working 40 years and saving diligently, I still couldn't afford the recent cancer removal found on a diagnostic for something else, nor the prescriptions I take. And many people require medical care and continuing health care.

Expand full comment

Moreover, Democrats MUST win the midterms so that America can take the lead in addressing climate change. Republicans do NOT trust science, nor do they acknowledge our duty to act as stewards for the environment. Republicans do not value the role of government, but only seek to reduce it.

Expand full comment

Anyone highly schooled in the art of "Belief" is skeptical of anything the white man at the front of the church does NOT say.

And, therein lies the problem.

Expand full comment

Do they not trust science, or do they merely find it inconvenient?

Expand full comment

It is hard to "trust" science, because, unlike religion where things are clear and nailed down, science is never clear and nailed down and is always evolving.

Hence, trust science is not even an appropriate phrase.

A better phrase is: Based on the data we have now, we can conclude (xyz) OR, based on the lack of data we have now we cannot conclude (xyz).

Saying things like "trust the science" is only something a non-scientist would say.

Expand full comment

I was at an international seminar in Europe when the ACA was being debated, the first time. I had people from all over the world asking me "why don't Americans want healthcare?" Right here in Maine, I have a neighbor who's told me flat out "healthcare is a privilege not a right."

If we let government slip back into the hands of Republicans, that's on us.

Expand full comment

I agree. I also am very worried about their rigging and suppressing of votes. They have flat out said that if all Americans are allowed to vote there is no way they could win. Thus their changes in procedure to access of voting. How do we stop that madness?

Expand full comment

In Texas, Beto is trying, but the propaganda machine is a juggernaut

Expand full comment

We are moving toward Blatanism, in which republicans no longer cloak their evil deeds with political correctness. I'm waiting for a politician to show their stripes by stating something like, "I hate blacks."

Expand full comment

Did you happen to see (on Twitter) where Josh Mandel, the Tr**p-backed Senate candidate in Ohio, in trying to show that he is not a racist (despite some pretty damning statements in the past), filmed a campaign ad which begins with him walking across the Edmund Pettis Bridge in Selma, AL, I assume, in an attempt to demonstrate he isn't a racist. Okay. At one point in the ad, a photo of Mandel among a group of other soldiers (who all are Black) appears. If you look closely, you can see Mandel has been photoshopped into the picture. At least his FACE has been photoshopped. His hands?? Not so much. Oops. God, these people are beyond clueless. If you have access to Twitter you can see it for yourself...it goes by pretty quick:

https://twitter.com/JoshMandelOhio/status/1511360397244350472?t=yiitt6S2czNUmsOft1753A&s=19

Expand full comment

That photo is appalling pandering. But it appears it isn’t photoshopped. Looks like they applied a darkening filter - to make the other soldiers look Blacker, I suppose. Mandel is foul. I fear for my state. Mandel and Vance are so revolting they can even make Trumpian Timkin look acceptable by comparison. 🤞 we can achieve another D senator here.

Expand full comment

My hope, too! Tim Ryan , present Ohio Democratic Congressman, is running for the Senate, and he is heads and shoulders above Mandel and those other Republican jokers.

Expand full comment

As much as I'd love to crow about this, it looks legit, although it may have been filtered in other ways:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/josh-mandel-photoshop-hands-ad/

Expand full comment

"Blatanism"

This began under Giingrich's Contract On America and Tom DeLay's hard-nosed pushing of the egregious gerrymandering of Texas districts. Before then, folks had enough shame to try to hide their misdeeds under rocks. With those 2 events, they started turning over the rocks on their own and crowing about their misdeeds.

Expand full comment

Dems need to blast this in their messaging.

Matt Gaetz voted against capping insulin, and says people should just lose weight.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/04/rep-matt-gaetz-votes-against-capping-insulin-prices-says-people-should-just-lose-weight/

Expand full comment

See: NYT video of Matt Gaetz grilling Sec. of Defense over Defense Institute in yesterday’s paper.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Every time I see a photo of Brett Kavanaugh, my first impression is of a smug, entitled drunken frat boy. Maybe it’s just the chubby baby cheeks, but that’s what I see.

Expand full comment

Maybe it's the "greasy kids' stuff."

Expand full comment

Elect a dem majority

Expand full comment

We were lucky enough to live in Maine for about 15 years. We operated a small business and the state offered us health insurance called "Dirigo". It made operating our business possible - a hospitality business that over the years had brought thousands of visitors to Maine who put a lot of money back into the state's economy.

Then, thanks to the now busted Eliot Cutler, Paul LePage was elected governor. Dirigo health insurance became a footnote in history. This and a couple of other personal issues sent us packing - back to MA. Where we were able to find affordable health insurance. It was called "Romneycare". Ironic, eh?

I see that LePage has returned to haunt you. I wish you luck. He is a monster.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Bill! I’ve lived in maine all my life and I am terrified of a return to the Lepage years.

Expand full comment

The problem with that, and a lot of GOP thinking, is that you pay more when you pay later. We end up with folks in the ER, the most expensive form of medical care. The GOP would rather spend $1k to apply a tourniquet after you've lost half your blood rather than spend 1₵ to prevent the cut. (Or something like that)

Expand full comment

Also, they would rather anyone who can’t afford the expensive treatment die, preferably first going into heavy debt. Remember this is the party who wants to go back to the original Constitution, before those pesky amendments ending slavery and ensuring rights for the mudsills.

Expand full comment

Can’t ❤️ this.

Expand full comment

They seem to lack the foresight to see that it's their base supporters that they would be killing off.

Expand full comment

They don't care, mainly because they are going all out on voter suppression anyway.

Expand full comment

Take “seem to” out of your sentence.

Expand full comment

Oh, I think they're perfectly aware of that -- they just don't care. All they care about is keeping power tightly grasped in their hot little fists.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Wee, there's that Hippocratic oath thingy...

Expand full comment

At the end of every line of the "Republican version" of the oath should be added, "...as long as they can pay."

Expand full comment

Sadly true, Bruce.

Expand full comment

You are so right, lin. We must be very vocal about what we expect from the people who represent us in Congress.

Expand full comment

lin,

Amurcans are big fans of Republicans. So, it is on us, exactly as you say.

Expand full comment

Hate to say it, but I'm losing faith in Americans.

Expand full comment

Russia needs to be expelled from the UN and cut off from all international bodies. They need to be treated the way North Korea is treated.

Expand full comment

Yes, TC, BUT...

A gigantic BUT.

I have not forgotten growing up in the 1950s when "Red China" was a blank space, a hole in the map of Asia, a void in America's collective mind. A reality so disliked, so shameful that it could be neither named nor thought. Not even when that "human wave" of the "Peoples Liberation Army came pouring across the North Korean border, drove back the UN (and US) armies, led Douglas MacArthur to rattle nukes and President Truman to fire him... And, after battling back and forth, truce bisected the peninsula... And look then at today's hard, uncontrollable, unwelcome reality north of Panmunjom...

All this at a moment in time when the only genuine existential threat in our world affects the entire planet, and with it, the entire human population, regardless of labels"bad", "good", regardless of wisdom or idiocy.

Meanwhile, the huge territory that is Russia suffers ruin, the kind of ruin that can take longer to repair than the rebuilding of shattered cities...

And when the dictator goes the way of all flesh, when the regime crumbles and seeks new forms -- always supposing we are still there -- when we have struggled to cope with global famine, when the Xi regime has consolidated its windfall gains beyond the Urals, there will still be a vast territory and a major population to bring back into the human fold.

This time, we have to look beyond today's disease, to a world in which we can all live together. And that means action NOW to look beyond war, beyond disease, beyond surgery and drugs, to recovery, health for Russia as well as Ukraine. We should know by now that pandemic disease, physical, mental, knows no frontiers.

This all means something painful to contemplate: the demands of PEACE and HEALTH, which are even greater than those of war and disease.

It must mean a steadfast commitment to universalism, a worldwide drive to end, not diversity, but exceptionalisms. And that in turn must mean no more punitive "treaties" that are no treaties at all, like the Versailles Treaty and the Trianon Treaty, no more exclusion of the defeated, treated as unpersons, uncountries.

Can we begin to envision this?

We are damned well going to have to.

And as I'm not talking of some airyfairy imaginary world, it means we're going to have to learn new ways of getting our act together, new ways of living with endemic discord, disease, violence, accepting realities we've preferred to deny and sweep under the rug, because where realities are denied there's not a hope in hell of dealing with them.

Let's take a hard look, then, at where so many generations of thoughtless automatisms, posing, posturing and mendacity, political, social, economic,

have led.

Doesn't that make a priority of healing our own disease before we declare the territory of fellow humans to be a forever-off-limits lepers' colony?

Writing immediately after WW2, Ananda Coomaraswamy commented that economic wars bring suffering worse than military ones -- no prisoners are taken. And now we've moved into new combinations of war both military and economic. Oligarchy against human beings, against our democratic institutions, against life itself.

America's -- and thus the world's -- ingrained ideology is one of dog-eat-dog competition for its own sake. Yet even the fiercest African wild dogs don't prey on one another, so why should humans have to?

Time to move beyond neo-Darwinist nonsense to something less unnatural, something that meets the needs of living together.

HERE ENDETH THE MORNING RANT.

I crave patience...

Expand full comment

Peter, I hear your wisdom in this. Is it not the basic wisdom of every “religion” before it gets co-opted by dogma? And the real existential threat of environmental degradation is at the root of the upheaval, I think. Supporting and propping up a privileged patriarchy that is killing us. But our ability to come together, to change our thinking to save ourselves, seems slim to me. ( A lesson I learned watching the Pandemic play out) The amplified autocracy-machine/smash-the-system activism is a weapon peace-loving people don’t know yet how to counter. We have built our Western economic system on advertising consumer goods. It’s evolved into a monster of mindless, unsustainable consumption, and -with the rise of social media-, pysop-mind-manipulation. When was the last time most of us have had a long, pondered thought? This forum is one respite from quick-click thinking, but most of daily life is quick, shallow thought, mostly reactive. Without deep, contemplative thought, humans have no chance of coming together for more than selfish, short-term reasons, I fear. “We are in for a bumpy ride”, to quote Bette Davis in “All about Eve”. As for Darwinism, I feel Darwin got it completely upside down. We are not at the top, be are at the bottom. All other beings on this beautiful blue marble know how to live sustainably, except us.

Expand full comment

Brilliant. And here’s a ramble. The way to Peace is not through War. Or deprivation for the majority through political power. Your roadmap is a start. When we stand with signs”War is Not the Answer” we must continue to work for the answers. The list is long. The health of the planet begins with environment and it’s humans who make those decisions. And health care for all is part of that list, not an afterthought. Too many humanitarian policies are in constant jeopardy of reversal and disappearing depending on party in power. This great experiment needs a new start. How? It’s the world, not one nation.

Expand full comment

'The way to peace is not through war.' This NYT op ed is sobering and heartbreaking. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/05/opinion/vietnam-refugees-factories-us-military.html

Expand full comment

Excellent. As i was reading posts, i was thinking about environmental degradation and how that is the ultimate threat. As one of our friends says, humans are the most invasive species. My spouse was lamenting this situation just this week. I pointed out to him that we are lucky in a way because we have no direct descendent and we are older. We are still trying to take care of our almost half acre lot organically and we support as best we can, local farmers. In the meantime, I see so many Amazon trucks delivering who knows what all over. On TV the ads are about drugs that once you've heard the side effects, you wonder why anyone would take them and buy this or that consumer good. And to think it only took humans a relatively short time here in the US to destroy fish runs, water sources, forests, etc. Everywhere greed seems to prevail which means we will not solve the environmental crisis.

Expand full comment

“Humans are the most invasive species.” Truer words have never been spoken! Really, it should begin reading like this: “HuMANs…”

Expand full comment

I like how you emphasized the word MAN in humans. I suspect our demise as a species and world will be because of gender inequality. The male gender has dominated and controlled the world for thousands of years. Nearly every war throughout history has been wrought by men. The only time when there was equality, peace, harmony and cooperation was in the hunter/gatherer era. That era subsided when agriculture became the new technology and labor was needed so women were dominated and required to produce labor. And…..here we are today. But I am hopeful. Women and other marginalized groups are striving for equality and the continual spotlight I am seeing on that gives me hope.

Expand full comment

The reality is that the idea of white men could end up becoming extinct if more interracial relationships take place. They would produce biracial babies so it would take the color “white” out of the equation. Also, the Census would be affected. See, the Repubs and evangelicals know this and it frightens them. That is why they they have come up with the Draconian laws to prevent abortions, to deny women access to decent healthcare. They would rather keep marginalized people “in their current place” in America. If these couples or women (they can get inseminated without the man, you know) choose to have a baby girl rather than a boy, they most certainly can. It is semantics in the making. Women can become legendary Amazons.

Expand full comment

👍🏼

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I am almost 80 as well and I wish I could be more optimistic. Yes, the most successful and therein is the paradox. One thing that struck me while I was reading my last book, The Dawn of Everything, was a description of the plethora of salmon here in the PNW before the appearance of Europeans. Last time I was at at the fish mongers, salmon was $45 a pound. Yes, it is early in the season, but....

Expand full comment

👍🏼 ...and you are around for it. It's right now a deadly crisis for millions of people; it's an economic war disguised as a policy question.

Expand full comment

Your thoughtful pragmatic DNA is the gift and legacy you pass on. The human race is not statically in the doldrums. While we have not come far enough, we have come a very long ways. Are we there yet? No, but our journey has been steadily forward.

Expand full comment

Try reading Piotr Kropotkin: Mutual Aid.

Expand full comment

well said!

Expand full comment

Beautifully said.

Expand full comment

Peter, I hope you rant every morning. This was good. I especially like your reference to "competition". There are so many ways it can be harnessed productively. But it does need to be structured and regulated. We are witnessing too much of it and in many cases not nearly enough. Rant on!

Expand full comment

Can’t ❤️this!

Expand full comment

Oh quit it. Quit making sense already. I hate it when you think out loud. I have worked hard for my delusions. I have worked hard for my hatred. How do I suddenly do an about face? How can I let go of my anxiety. You ask the impossible of us.

Expand full comment

Trouble is, Pat, I don't know if I'm capable of writing anything that is not “thinking out loud”.

Some other things you've written here I have not understood, but as I am not able to let go of my anxiety at will, I try to enable anxiety to let go of me. And that can fail easily enough.

I can think of nothing more terrifying than to imagine myself in the place of those who have committed the greatest possible abuses of power and are now faced with the consequences. A direct insight into hell, quite beyond any hatred, any emotion I could ever imagine. Except fear, which I don't usually access easily but is now very present. So needs to be looked in the face.

From the little I've seen of them, it would never occur to me to doubt the honesty of your comments, you do come across to me as at one with your thoughts, without being betrayed by impulsiveness. And when Christine says you are not alone, that's putting it mildly. We are all struggling, and I hope I've said nothing that makes the struggle harder.

From time to time life does make demands that seem impossible and that is what it feels like at this moment. May we have faith and courage.

Expand full comment

In my war I often found myself under the big guns. Literally under the muzzles of the 155’s and the 105’s. I came to rely on them keeping us out of harms way. This morning I awakened to the artillery thundering across this forum. Without you big guns we have almost no support. So you see your faith and courage and your fellow big guns thundering helps more than you may know. Keep your powder dry, friend.

Expand full comment

I think your comment the most honest of the morning, Pat. And I understand it completely. You are not alone. People struggling mightily with hate that has reared its head like a fire breathing dragon at the outrage regarding the entire Ukrainian people. And the threat to democracy and slide towards authoritarian rule.

Expand full comment

...and the climate crisis is an economic war.

Expand full comment

There is no “BUT”…..right now. Russian soldiers, on Putin’s orders and formerly on Stalin’s orders raping females aged 8 to 80? “Conquering” territory and annihilating humans and then calling it “denazification”?

Putin is an abomination. And his popularity grows. Russian women soldiers laugh at the horrors. Russian mothers wait for the spoils to get brought back to Russia.

Not only expel Russia from the UN. Expel the country and then kill its leader. I would do it with my bare hands if I had to hide my daughters and baby grands from the beasts of soldiers.

My thought of first step to the peace room instead of war room is to vote out every traitor in the American government, tell the Dem party to grow a pair, elect and place more women than men…or at least a 50-50 balance, in legislative power, and finally write a personal message to Viktor Orban…..

Putin warship……go f*ck yourself.

I am really in a state over what is going on. I’m usually the one to be patient and cynical at the same time, and surely have been told to quit being so pollyanish, but honestly…I am enraged at the atrocities and my light saber is glowing full blue neon.

Expand full comment

Amen to that.

Expand full comment

Putin stands condemned. He may hide for a while until the man in the White House gives the nod, if he hasn’t already.

Expand full comment

“...because where realities are denied there's not a hope in hell of dealing with them.” Yes, Peter. This. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Jeeze Gail. What is wrong with these people? Hope is flooding my kitchen this morning. I see it hit your place too. The damn sun is pouring over the continental divide now as well. This is too much, I’m gonna go feed some hay burners and check back later and see if this nonsense is spreading.

Expand full comment

I’m gonna go ride my own hay burners and enjoy the first sun in many days.

Expand full comment

Do they have horses in Ohio?

Expand full comment

Haha many of them!

Expand full comment

I'm going fishing. 🙂🐟

Expand full comment

Oooh. Game changer. Should I go fishing or work on the barn? Hmmmmm, the steelhead are running. Okay okay screw the barn. Are you married, never mind don’t answer that. Only my sisters like to fish.

Expand full comment

Twin sisters from another mother. 🙂

Expand full comment

🌟⚡️✨⚡️🌟 SAY IT PETER - SHOUT IT OUT!!! 🌟⚡️✨⚡️🌟

Expand full comment

Peter, Buried in your rant is the real point. China walks away with the Eastern 1/3 of the Russian Federation. Which gives them room to expend and exploit the natural resources they need. I think the deal has already been made. Give it two weeks and Xi will start to bad mouth Putin.

Expand full comment

I don't know about those last two sentences -- they're not usually in such a rush, having time and long-term planning on their side -- but I was told that Chinese school text books show Lake Baikal as Chinese territory.

Expand full comment

Peter you touched on one of the salient characteristics of China. If you look at their history (beautifully explored a few years ago in a long-ish PBS documentary of several parts exploring Chinese history, something largely unknown in the West) one trait they have that is sadly lacking in the West is PATIENCE. They will wait, for generations or decades if need be, for situations to change to their advantage. They play the West's IMpatience like a game. To them there is virtue in watching and waiting...

Expand full comment

Peter, I responded to your 'but, BUT' in response to Bill's idea about a completely different UN. Please take a look. Salud.

Expand full comment

I wasn't to know that, Fern, but I am reading Bill's sharply intelligent message now: practical criticism that must be particularly valuable at a time like this when we find ourselves compelled to reform institutions so as to meet new basic needs.

Meanwhile, we have to make the best possible use of what we've got...

Expand full comment

Inspired by your comment, Peter, I went and watched the video from the U.N. yesterday, with first the Secretary General and the Under-Secretary General speechifying. There were many people who have practiced their public speaking, a lot of people on camera behind them who dressed up nice to get their chance one day. It seemed to me on the lines of a beauty pageant when they get to the question and answer part. Lots of heart-felt ideas; not a chance they’re going to do anything more with those ideas, except dress up nice once again, and come back for more “long and frank discussions of the issues.”

“Madame President, I remind the council of what the council already knows well… for the sake of the people of Ukraine, for the sake of the people of the world who cannot afford to bear the additional burden that this war imposes, as others have said repeatedly here, I call on the members of this council to once again say that we must silence the guns. Oh, and of course, one of our members who has the veto to stop anything that we decide is the one who is waging this war. Thank you Madame President.”

Then the ghastly video of dismembered bodies.

I can’t imagine that this institution can be reformed. It seems to me that it can only be replaced.

Expand full comment

From the song: “How can I keep from Singing” —

“While though the tempest loudly roars

I hear the truth, it liveth

And though the darkness 'round me close

Songs in the night it giveth”

I think of this music every time I hear another insane politician of political “rubbish”!

Expand full comment

You and me both, Patricia!

Expand full comment

Well said. Thank you.

Expand full comment

That's my gut reaction as well. But look how that is working out with regards to NK. Not.

I am going out on a limb here and suggest that every nation should be automatically enrolled as a member of the UN. Eligibility based on existence. Resignation would not be an option. You are on the planet, you are a member of the UN. The UN has no influence over NK now. But as a member it might be influenced.

My second "out on a limb" proposal is that the Security Council should actually function as such. Eliminate the ability of one nation to veto. Make it a super majority of sorts.

And third, the UN needs more money and more power. That means assessing countries with much bigger dues. A refusal to pay would not mean expulsion. It would mean financial sanctions and trade isolation.

Climate crisis issues and regulations would be integral to every UN decision and debate. Any nation failing to follow the right scientifically established path to addressing it would suffer economic penalties and/or isolation. Example. Not only would Russia be charged with "crimes against humanity", it would be charged with crimes against the planet.

And fourth, the UN needs to be able to send troops and advanced weaponry to places like Ukraine, Myanmar, Sudan, Yemen, Bosnia, Rwanda - you get the picture.

Yes, this would be a movement towards a "one world government". One species, one planet. Have at me.

Expand full comment

And then there is reality, Bill. What Peter wrote, his 'but, BUT' - realistic - or the blueprint of a dream" ? How are countries functioning now? What is plausible? How has the UN functioned vis-à-vis the world? What Zelensky said about the UN, wasn't he realistic? Can TC possibly answer Peter's question without saying that it is a dream? Any possible remedial steps? Can Putin be stopped from obliterating Ukraine? If not, which country is next? How are we doing with climate catastrophe -- saving planet Earth from ourselves?

Expand full comment

All logical questions. Just watched the PBS Ken Burns profile of Ben Franklin. The US was a highly unlikely and improbable dream prior to the Revolution. Most "Americans" were opposed.

So I say set your goals high and be amazed.

Expand full comment

'Sounds' good, Bill.

'A Change is gonna come'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYiN-8NSCCI

Expand full comment

<3 [It wouldn't let me click heart]

Expand full comment

Bill, Peter, Michael et al., we do believe in dreams... how to make them real? From Lincoln to Martin Luther King, Jr. - many before, during and after; we continue to try to make them come alive; to rescue, improve and expand on them. The Affordable Care Act happened; we continue to fight for it, improve it and expand on it.

Expand full comment

We make them real by having them jumpstarted by George Floyd, the Ukrainian people, President Zelensky.

Expand full comment

Still, if you need specialized care, you will be sidelined without private insurance - doctors can refuse to take Medicare and especially Medicaid - it costs more to do the paperwork and fulfill bureaucratic requirements than government reimburses.

Expand full comment

Yes, Kathleen, there are serious limitations to ACA. As for Medicare, one of my former doctors stopped treating his patients on Medicare. Of course, I wrote him pointing out the two different faces he wore depending on his situation, not ours. As expected he did not respond.

Universal Health Care in the USA? No, siree!

Expand full comment

Michael Bruwer Suggestion: Go to the top of the page where the search bar is. Look to the left of it. There's a nearly complete circle w/an arrow @ the end. That's the refresh button. Click on it then go back to what you want to "heart" and click on the heart. Should work. If not, try again.

Expand full comment

Barbara, You earned the like. Your advice worked, so the heart is bigger than it looks. Cheers!

Expand full comment

And every person on Earth would have two citizenships - one the citizenship in their nation of birth; the other planetary citizenship. No one will be illegal.

Expand full comment

"No one will be illegal." This is the essence of my attitude. Love it.

Expand full comment

... kind of like counties, states, countries ... planets ...?

Expand full comment

What’s been missing has been the will to create better world security. I think Zalensky’s address to the UN will be seen as a catalyst to more robust defense of vulnerable nations.

I think including the planets is science fiction for now.

Expand full comment

... for now, yes - baby steps, for now ... acceleration as we speak - warp speed pending ....

Expand full comment

Hard to have at you when I totally agree with your comment, Bill. The notion of governments working together to solve what one alone cannot is an excellent example of “the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.” And I love the idea of being able to charge for “crimes against the planet.”

Expand full comment

As long as governments are run by men, cooperation will never be a thing. Only competition.

Expand full comment

Would that be representative governance of some sort?

Expand full comment

I think of “self governance at the global level with an informed and involved electorate” which would elect representatives.

Expand full comment

I agree. But the injured beast Putin has been cornered and we all know what happens next: they attack. In his desperation, the use of short range nuclear weapons becomes more plausible. It's world leaders' greatest fear.

Expand full comment

I agree with what you've written too, although this truth is anything but “likeable”.

I've been hoping for, looking for a way out for Putin, out of no love for the man but concern for a basic principle of warfare, that a way be left open for a cornered enemy. All the more so given this one's fangs.

This might have been possible if only he had not fallen into the trap he set for others; and if his mindset was not such that he has been digging himself in deeper and dragging his country down with him. As have his troops, behaving like the retreating SS or the Milices in France, like Italian Fascist fanatics driven into their last redoubt, Mussolini's Salò Republic.

How to save him from himself? Above all, how to save the peoples of both Ukraine and Russia and lands beyond? As things stand, the judoka’s well-tried acrobatic skills aren’t going to be of much use unless some new trick can be performed in time for him to present failure as success at the May 9th WW2 victory parade.

In November 2016 I wondered in my notebook if the destruction of Syria was not the dress rehearsal for what would befall any who dare resist oligarchy…

Expand full comment

TC, do you have a response to Peter Burnett?

Expand full comment

Fern, I did say "Yes, BUT". And yes is yes even when heavily qualified.

Rage, outrage, nausea.

But then, we're going to have to move beyond the emotions that are gripping us.

Just as in another world we and captains of industry and finance are damned well going to have to tear off our quarterly-returns blinkers and look hard at life beyond nosebags.

Expand full comment

I do, Fern ... Thank you Peter - well stated - SAY IT AGAIN, LOUDER - LOUDER!!!!!

Expand full comment

Thanks, I'd like to, but if you're with me now it's up to YOU and to everyone who's of the same mind. Only that way can it become louder!

Expand full comment

Hi Peter. I'm not tuned in to the inner workings of politics or war - they don't make sense to me. For me, it comes down to getting along with people - respect and congeniality - flexibility in the face of contention ... a life-long path of learning with much sacrifice to survive - off with the nosebag altogether (love the analogy!) ... plenty of room for improvement on my part too, so taking my own inventory ... deeply disturbed by murder, rape and brutish prejudice and ignorance - no idea how to cope with these issues - just take care of life, keep working to study/practice creative expression and trust it will make a difference, somehow .... I still think the Kremlin is home to the mothership of a highly advanced intelligence, nestled beneath the surface - who really is directing this drama ... interesting that both Zelensky and Trump found their way to related presidencies via popular media - thinking this is a test to determine humanity's evolutionary path through this phase of the Kali-Yuga ... respect and appreciation to you ....

Expand full comment

I couldn't follow what you wrote about the Kremlin -- Russia, maybe, there is something still there, still intact despite 1917 and the more recent thieves' paradise -- but... the Kremlin?

Mind you, I have never been inside those walls.

"A test to determine humanity's evolutionary path through this phase of the Kali-Yuga." Surely that, among other things.

Expand full comment

Well Peter, my mind is so wide open, sometimes it is hard to find a linear paper trail - or anything resembling verified fact. This may seem very far-fetched, but to me, it makes perfect sense - especially as our world is accelerating to eventual warp speed ... let me explain my observations - I would be interested to know if it rings true for you.

My first inclination that the Kremlin might be a camouflaged nest for the Mothership (from who knows where) came on the heels of a report I saw about the dorsal fin of the humpback whale. (... What?! ... stay with me here - I'll stitch it together ...)

Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7650744/

For some reason, I then saw a report about the Kremlin, with a picture, and happened to notice the curve of the structure along the river - it looked very much like the curve of the dorsal fin of the humpback whale - which apparently has hydro/aerodynamic features. Hmmm ....

Next, I did a search for aerial imagery of the whole property - mmm, looks kind of like it could be the shape of a spaceship to me - especially with those small extended triangular corners. Ok, is this too far out? What about the structure with the globular towers with spires reaching into the sky? They sure look like antennas to me.

Look also at architecture in Thailand and Brunei. More spires ... any connection? I don't know, but I would not rule out the possibility that higher intelligence is operative, at least, in some parts of our world.

On top of that, I saw a movie (often a source of otherwise unpublished information) with either Vin Diesel or Keifer Sutherland (don't recall which) about a revolutionary movement centered under the Kremlin with extremely high tech dynamics.

So ..., in my mind, even though I do not know the history (so doomed to relive it) my guess is that 'Mother Russia' has a deeper root than most would suspect.

What do you sense about all of that?

Expand full comment

Thank you, Kathleen, very much.

At this moment, I don't have the time to respond adequately, but I do want to say that those two key-words you have produced -- respect and congeniality -- are very well chosen. I was fumbling for the second of them...

On this business of entertainers, I hesitate to generalize. There are those who bring us down to their level, there are those who rise to the occasion. And... aren't we all playing in our own film?

Seneca put it like this:

"Life's a theatrical performance. What counts isn't how long it lasts but whether it's well played."

Expand full comment

Yes Peter (well said, Seneca) ... and so, the stage is set for choosing - which model will we follow - some to rise, others to sink into the compost - weighted by accumulated decay - and that is well, as it must be - the snake that cannot shed her skin will die ... we are tiny cells in the body of life evolving - wee atoms in a universe of turnings ... and yes, I also wrestled with the words ... thankfully, I am intuitive - it rose to the surface of my ever churning depths ...

Expand full comment

Based on blood analysis, roughly 50% of the USA has had Covid. This percentage will increase. The bizarre side effects often much delayed, even after asymptomatic Covid, are an ever expanding list. This is before we get to debilitating Long Covid. If the useless GOP repeals Obamacare, over half the population will have a pre-existing condition (Covid) for which there is no health insurance coverage. Because of the bizarre post-Covid side effects, insurance companies will be able to claim almost anything is a Covid related pre-existing condition! It is just amazing AMAZING that in a deadly pandemic the useless GOP is not 'tarred and feathered' for mentioning repeal of Obamacare! What is wrong with people?!?!

Expand full comment

Like “What’s the Matter With Kansas.” The idiocy has metastasized across the land. Propaganda works

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

But that GOP/"evangelical" cabal wouldn't allow assisted suicide-"religion" wouldn't allow it-gotta suffer, right? (S/)

Expand full comment

"Am I my brother's keeper?" No, says 42% of Americans, blindly following hypocritical, evangelical shysters.

Expand full comment

Wonder if they call themselves “Christian”?

Expand full comment

They are Christians. Good Christians are pro-birth and devoted to the concept of the Prosperity Gospel. They are not at all Christ-like. Whether or not you believe that a person referred to as Jesus Christ existed, you can definitely agree that this real or fictitious person would be devastated by the beliefs and values of current day Christian Conservatives supporting Trumpism. I am not a believer, but I'd like to think I am Christ-like or at least always trying to be Christ-like.

Expand full comment

Yes, and me too. I have no idea if Jesus ever really existed. It doesn't really matter. He had some pretty fine ideas. Too bad so many of his "followers" have become bigoted haters.

But John Pavlovitz has a book out called "If God is Love, Don't be a Jerk". Catchy title, I think. And there is a little positive rebellion in the ranks of some Southern Baptists.

Expand full comment

They, unfortunately, follow the example of the old Pharisees as described in the New Testament. Those upright stalwarts followed a staggering 640 daily rules to keep them “holy” (an estimate of the number, I believe). The missing information from the parable of the Good Samaritan is that only the well-to-do could fully observe those rules. Sound familiar?

Expand full comment

Guess you haven't Been reading about the Baptist's problem of hiding sexual abuse..... kinda like the catholics...... but go on "ACT LIKE" a christian

Expand full comment

Well, if we're not a brothers' keeper, then shall we disband the Pentagon? stop warring? stop supplying bombs to the world? Isn't warfare a (twisted) version of being our brother's keeper?

Expand full comment

No. War is corporate business.

Expand full comment

Cain said that after he murdered Abel.

Expand full comment

Yup

Expand full comment

Cain was hoping God would believe it was an accident, not his responsibility. Reminds me of the Sacklers and the epidemic of opioid deaths, the tobacco industry, etc., etc.

Expand full comment

I’m in London for a few days and listening to the news about the incompetence of the Tories to manage pretty much anything. But they can’t hold a candle to the sheer evil, cynicism, and bloody mindedness of today’s Ghastly Obstructionist Party.

Expand full comment

And the “GOP” couldn’t be more proud of their incompetence and their allegiance to downright evil. Call it what it is…

Expand full comment

Ghastly Obstructionist Party is an excellent name. Several thoughts come to mind. Georgia Girl, they aren’t “Christian”. Those who follow Christ are called to love others as they love themselves. Jim Wallace, a progressive Christian pastor says that anything that hurts the poor is heresy. Period. These R people are all about money, and they are bought and paid for by robber barons like the Koch network. They believe “why should we look after the stupid people?” This is idea sums up Ayn Rand. Doing anything for profit opens up that activity for abuse. If it possible to abuse something, then the R’s will find a way.

Expand full comment

And even Ayn Rand had govt assistance at the end of her life.

Expand full comment

Yes, think on that one. Even the virulent libertarians are glad for government help if they are in need. Somehow they see themselves as “deserving,” where others made stupid choices. Government is us, all of us, coming together tonight “in order to form a more perfect union, promote the general welfare and provide for the common defense. . . Promoting the general welfare- quality healthcare available to everyone, free public education, affordable, reliable childcare for working families, assistance in caring for the elderly, etc. in addition to roads, bridges, broadband and other infrastructure.

Expand full comment

Then, oughtn't we not hound Biden to increase the Supreme Court and disband the filibuster?

Expand full comment

He doesn’t have the votes.

Expand full comment

Right. So we each do what we can to elect more good Dems so the votes will be there.

Expand full comment

Thank you for today's Letter, Dr. R! To add to the plate is the push to prohibit Louis DeJoy from going ahead with his deal to purchase a new fleet of "non-union built gas-guzzling mail delivery trucks despite directives from the Biden administration to green the federal fleet." According to the latest news, it's not too late. Here's a link to send a message to your Congress reps to Save the USPS: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/tell-congress-block-dejoys-bad-deal-the-usps-contract-must-require-at-least-75-electric-trucks-2/?source=group-afr-advocacy-fund-c4&referrer=group-afr-advocacy-fund-c4&redirect=https://secure.actblue.com/donate/stop_dejoys_bad_deal&link_id=2&can_id=fd80a86766186aa12fbef1b71efa86b9&email_referrer=email_1501561&email_subject=dejoy-is-feeling-the-pressure&refcodeEmailReferrer=email_1501561

Here is HR 7018, a bill sponsored by Rep Gerry Connolly and co-sponsored by approx. 74 Reps to "prohibit the United States Postal Service from carrying out a contract for the procurement of next generation vehicle fleet unless such fleet is at least 75 percent electric or zero emission vehicles, and for other purposes":

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7018/text?r=2&s=1

Expand full comment

Thanks! I just sent the letter. Easy Peasy. It is stunning to me that DeJoy is still running the USPS. It is stunning to me that there isn't a requirement that the entire fleet of government vehicles isn't preparing to be electric. I am so stunned I am getting numb. But I can still type.

Expand full comment

Stay stunned if you must, Bill, just don't get numb...we need you!

Expand full comment

Thank you for providing the link to stop DeJoy. It was quick and easy to complete.

Expand full comment

The appointments to the board that governs USPS that Biden made have been stalled in the approval process by the Senate. Biden cannot remove DeJoy (although I hope that a criminal trial may do that soon), his position is managed by an oversight board.

Expand full comment

fingers crossed for a criminal indictment.

Expand full comment

I did a skim read about that indictment soon, Ally. Honestly, everything's an uphill battle but we must persist!

Expand full comment

Morning, MaryPat! I hope he will be soon. Thanks for the Forbes article.

Expand full comment

Morning, Lynell! Hope so, too!

Expand full comment

Morning, MaryPat (Not really...it's p.m. here in VA!)

Expand full comment

Here in Michigan, too, but I am still in my pajamas, enjoying watching the rain! The ice is finally melting off the lake!

Expand full comment

I took a peek at the time zone after I sent you my latest reply. Now I know where Michigan stands...time-wise!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Lynell. Just fired off a letter to John Katko - one of the sometimes reasonable Republicans in the House.

Expand full comment

Wonderful, Lena. Thanks!

Expand full comment

To make it even worse, DeJoy owns stock in the very company that makes the Covid test kits the USPS chose for their free delivery.

Expand full comment

👍🏼 thanks for this info

Expand full comment

Isn't that what has gotten him into trouble recently, KR? Anyway, the country right now just feels like one big birthday cake full of trick candles. We blow several candles out on one end but they ignite again while we're blowing another several out on the other end!

Expand full comment

Not enough trouble, Lynell! Why oh why is he still there? (I know why, just wish it weren’t so)

Expand full comment

The lizard.

Expand full comment

Why the hell is dejoy still employed and messing up our postal system? WTH? Out with him!

Expand full comment

My understanding is the USPS is run by nine Board of Governors appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Congress. The board selects the Postmaster General who currently is DeJoy. Only the board can "fire" DeJoy. This Board is a holdover from 45's administration. There are some empty seats, I believe, that if filled by President Biden would be able to fire DeJoy. To date, this has not happened, I'm assuming because there's been so many fires that the President has had to put out, he hasn't had time to devote to this issue.

https://about.usps.com/who/leadership/board-governors/

Expand full comment

Thanks.

Expand full comment

Oh Glory

Expand full comment

This week's 4/4 New Yorker has a USPS ad on the last page: "delivering with advanced technology and equipment...our next generation trucks will carry even more packages... Vague language suggesting some progress toward electric.

Expand full comment

I see no mention of such progress in the ad. Unless you mean their headline, "Delivering for Innovators"

Hah!

Expand full comment

I surely hope it's about electric and not what DeJoy ordered!

Expand full comment

Congresswoman Jennifer Wexton replied to my letter opposing DeJoy's decision. Here is an excerpt from her reply: "As you know, in February 2021 USPS awarded a contract to Oshkosh Defense to build up to 165,000 new mail delivery trucks, the majority of which will be gasoline-powered. This fleet of trucks will cost $6 billion over the course of the next ten years and will replace the entire current fleet of delivery trucks, which have been in service for multiple decades and lack many basic safety features, adequate space for the growing number of packages USPS delivers, and air conditioning. The Environmental Protection Agency and the White House Council of Environmental Quality oppose the decision to procure gasoline-powered vehicles rather than electric ones, but USPS has stated that it lacks the funding needed to procure a fully battery electric fleet. USPS placed its first order for these vehicles on March 24, 2022, which included more than double the number of battery electric vehicles than initially planned, up from 5,000 to over 10,000."

Expand full comment

Thanks for this update, Nancy. My initial post was from the "SAVE THE POST OFFICE" website which commented about the number going to 10,000. But they did say that it wasn't too late to get a much bigger number out of DeJoy. So am crossing my fingers that that can happen.

Expand full comment

Thank you once again Heather for a succinct, non-hysterical view of the world. May your days be numerous.

Expand full comment

Perfectly said, Stephen!

Expand full comment

Professor HCR, your letter is filled with so many critical issues and analysis for today’s news. All news. Thank you for selecting important quotes and the essentials. I keep going back to this question: Why do the repubs want to dismantle or cripple every law, policy, regulation, even when the American people, both Dems and repubs benefit? Why do 42% of Americans not like the Affordable Care Act? What would they prefer?

And your ending comments and statistics about the resolution introduced by Democrat Gerry Connolly reaffirming support for NATO, passing with bipartisan vote:

“After all, what’s there to oppose in a nod to democratic values and diplomacy, when Ukraine is locked in a deadly battle to defend itself against an invasion and brutal occupation by Russian forces directed by authoritarian Russian president Vladimir Putin?”

“Sixty-three Republicans—those who tend to support former president Trump—voted against the resolution.”

Toddlers say “NO” and “me do it” just because. What’s the reason repubs vote against a humanitarian resolution and so many social programs? What is their purpose? Do they remember their oath?

Expand full comment

Propaganda works. Reagan brought Rupert to do what Rupert has done, made America stupid again

Expand full comment

Over the last 5 years I have been flabbergasted by the number of “stupids”. Watching people’s mouths move and not a wor of knowledge or truth come out. It is dumbfounding.

Expand full comment

Do you live in Tx? Stupid is epidemic

Expand full comment

The R’s are persons of immature values. Self-centered behavior is very immature. Plus, they had their fingers crossed behind their backs when they took their oath of office. They considered the oath taking purely perfunctory and of no real consequence. Has anyone in the Congress ever been prosecuted for violating their oath of office?

Expand full comment

Their oath means nothing to them, because they have no honor. Their belief structure is such that their investment in maintaining white, male, cisgendered, heterosexual, Christian dominance and prominence is their only goal. Subjugation of women, removing all civil rights protections from Blacks and the LGBTQ community, and environmental destruction in the name of profit is all they understand.

Expand full comment

Yes, yes, yes. Just words and no commitment to the people. Serve is not in their vocabulary. Or honor. Or Truth. List is endless.

Expand full comment

In the poll about the ACA, it would be interesting to see the income breakdown. I bet it follows the support statistics. Are the contingent of Congress and the Senate that voted against ACA and this expansion willing to give up their free medical care and help their fellow humans pay medical bills. My guess is "no". And, I will also hazard that those same people have no concept of what medical costs are. If you quizzed those who voted against a lower cost for insulin, would they know? Without help, instead of being able to walk like those representatives, I would be in a wheelchair for the last 15 years and into the future as my hip replacements cost close to $100,000.

I would also guess that those who want to scrap the ACA have NO concept of how much it will cost the states. What's their solution? Omigosh, I forgot. They have a "beautiful " plan and we'll hear about it in "just 2 weeks "

Expand full comment

What is their plan?

J.u.s.t. D.i.e.

Expand full comment

... costs less ... greater rewards in the long run ...?

Expand full comment

Remember the death squads? What a flip... the GOP embraces Medical Darwinism.

Expand full comment

"death squads"

The irony is that, in a sense, they'd already existed well before the ACA, with insurance companies finding every excuse possible NOT to cover something.

Expand full comment

Thank you Heather.

Ron Johnson's statement is very much the mantra of the GOP.

I overheard a conversation the other day between 2 Republicans that was basically seeped in " when we take over in November ". Please note, the jargon wasn't, "when we win".

The difference being a take over verses a legitimate election.

Frankly, this conversation was not between 2 crazies still jawing about gas prices.

When the guard changes, everything good that Biden has done will be reversed. We are as dangerously in peril today as we were January 6th. Nothing has changed.

Be safe. Be well.

Expand full comment

Please don’t give up. Work to get out the vote. GOTV. Start the blue wave in the elections going on NOW. https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_calendar

Expand full comment

Gigi, now is not the time to give up. We must fight for our Democracy. Our lives depend on it.

Expand full comment

Smh... those 63 Republicans obviously lack any humanity and should be voted out of office at the earliest opportunity.

"After all, what’s there to oppose in a nod to democratic values and diplomacy, when Ukraine is locked in a deadly battle to defend itself against an invasion and brutal occupation by Russian forces directed by authoritarian Russian president Vladimir Putin?

Sixty-three Republicans—those who tend to support former president Trump—voted against the resolution."

Expand full comment

What we need to remember is that those 63 republicans are exactly where they are because their constituents like what they do. “Voting them out” means a heart transplant for lots and lots of unwilling people. How do you change those hearts? We don’t know. Walk up to a bar or coffee shop in any of their constituencies and strike up a conversation about this and you may, just may, escape with your life.

Expand full comment

I attended a webinar last night about the threat to Medicare of sneaking privatization due to "Direct Contracting Entities" also known as the REACH program. It allows private firms to insert themselves as managed (or accountable) care organizations between the government and doctors to "manage" care (and skim substantial profits off the top. This apparently started under Trump and hasn't yet been stopped. Check out protectmedicare.net or pnhp.org for more info.

Expand full comment

Anyone watching current affairs who doesn't see that these scum are The Enemy and that there's no "understanding" them to bring them around, probably believes the Easter Bunny is coming Sunday to personally give them their chocolate eggs on a day when the sun has risen in the west. And this time they don't get to take the horses home for spring planting, no letting them off easy like the last time.

Expand full comment

Easier to understand them as seditionists and block them, if we cannot get them indicted and imprisoned, soon.

Expand full comment

Why is it that the millionaire GOP senators want to take away medical coverage from average income and low income Americans? I think it's a desire by their patrons, billionaire families like the Kochs, to return to the Gilded Age and its sensibilities. That was a time ( late 1800s) when the rich got rich and there was a core belief that some were better than others. A selct few were entitled to be the decision makers. The Vanderbilts and Goulds are the Kochs' role models. Not so good for the rest of us.

Expand full comment

Your assessment is accurate.

Expand full comment

Why hasn't the Democratic party hired a kick-a$$ marketing firm?? Time to get serious and refute the lies!

Expand full comment

Obama said something to that effect when he was at the White House today!

Expand full comment