559 Comments

Here’s the thing: By and large, the readers of this newsletter are well informed and obtain their news from multiple sources. The same is NOT true for many if not most Republicans. They get their news from Fox, or OANN or Newsmax, or even worse, Joe Rogan or someone like him. They will hear nothing of McCarthy’s duplicity. They will hear nothing of MTG’s sedition (and to the extent that they will, they will AGREE with it). For them, there is no Republican “disarray”.

It’s both disheartening and infuriating.

Expand full comment

The battle lines are the courts, gerrymandering, media manipulation,voter turn-out, and voter access. We still outnumber them. And we need to make that resonate.

Expand full comment

One still has to 'highly' motivate that majority to actually turn out. There will be no laying back on any laurels, especially by those lucky enough to be educated to the actual facts.

Expand full comment

The very place where state legislatures have the legal right to overturn the will of the people - but only if Dems win.

Expand full comment

Looks like the Democrats are taking off the kid gloves. A statement from the DNC: "“Kevin McCarthy is a fraud and a liar,” DNC spokesperson Ammar Moussa said in a statement Friday. “Republicans are not fit to govern, and Republican majorities would mean little more than complete subservience to Donald Trump.”

Expand full comment

Good, but not good enough. Dems need to include in all of these statements what they have done for the American people and what they would do if Republicans would stop blocking them. Just reacting to Republicans lies and duplicity is not enough. Dems need to go on the offensive. Every day. On every media. In every state.

Glad to hear yesterday that Jill Biden and First Gentleman are traveling throughout the country, including red states, talking to folks about the Dems programs. Local media covers this.

Expand full comment

Gina, I agree absolutely. My frustration trying to work at the local level is that even there, the tendency is to let the right-wingers set the agenda. In my state, the classic Dem response has been press releases about things Republicans have said or done, thus reinforcing that dynamic. I am really tired of it of this passive approach, and I've been speaking up about it. We need people willing to speak out, name what is wrong, and also name what we need to do about it. I fear that it is too late in the season to build the kind of party infrastructure we need. I am rethinking what role I should be in. I hope we can turn things around. The party has instituted what I think are some good structural changes, and that gives me some optimism. But it has failed in building the kind of coalitions that are absolutely essential. I keep poking at it, and I won't give up. but at this moment I am disgusted and disappointed. If we are willing to stick our necks out, we can still pull it off and I think have a good go at 2024. But it takes the willingness to do things in a completely different way than the same thing that hasn't worked in the past. Geez. When I look around and see what ordinary people in this state are accomplishing in their volunteer-run activist organizations, I can see what's possible, and it is nothing short of amazing. The Dems need to get on the same train.

Expand full comment

Well put, Annie, and it is frustrating and disappointing. I wish more Dems, everywhere, would speak as forcefully, clearly and effectively as that wonderful Senator in Michigan. And don’t wait to do it just in response to Republicans’ lies and attacks. Go on the offense!

Yes……Geez.

Expand full comment

William F.Buckley came to my home town of 14,000 in the early 196os and was invited to dinner at the home of one of my high school chemistry teacher's whose daughter was my age. My parents would not say his name in our house, he was so reviled for. his extremely Catholic stance on human nature. I didn't learn if this episode until last year. Many folks in my neck of the woods were so impressed with his posh accent and clever command of the English language, he could have proported the moon was made of green cheese and they would have lauded his veracity. So my state voted Democrat in the Presidential election. In small towns, people talk to each other, often they all know each other, unlike life in cities.

Small towns are influencial outside their own boundaries. My point is there was enough discussion amongst the townfolk, that issues were raised and ideas were exchanged. It brought out the vote. I hope would be that Democratic speakers would be invited to homes and have after dinner discussions to sharpen voters ability to discuss points and present various viewpoints peacefully on a full stomach. That is grass roots work, putting personal energy into your convictions.

Expand full comment

"Just reacting to Republicans lies and duplicity is not enough." It never has been enough, and yet it seems to have been the Democrats' ordinary status, which has to be why we are in the mess we are, as a country. Republicans haven't done one darn thing for the people of this country since Reagan came to power, and yet they continue to be elected, primarily by ramming through gerrymandered voting districts. FORGET ABOUT PUBLICIZING dRUMPF. Drum into the electorate's head all the programs and policies Democrats have stood for for decades, the great improvements Democrats, when in authority, have made f/b/o Americans, and the total lack of any coherent, or ANY, policies or benefits forwarded by Republicans for those same decades.

Expand full comment

Good point, Gina, about local media coverage. Wonderful way to break through the Fox, etc. media wall.

Expand full comment

Absolutely agree!

Expand full comment

Barbara The same was said about Bone Spur Donald and 74 million people voted for Jabba the Hutt in 2020. Perhaps this message should be spread in comic book form and/or as a football analogy. KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID!

Expand full comment

how about western movie characters as analogies? repubs are the wealthy ranchers who got where they are by rustling and rebranding cattle. their base are the washed up cowboys who are tired of chasing stampedes and hire out as guns for the ranchers, who want to take over the town, then the territory, and then get elected senators and governors. the dems are the marshalls, the schoolmarms and the farmers who want to settle down, get married, and lead a decent middle class life. i hasten to add that western movies are not historically accurate. however, "when the legend becomes the truth, print the legend." or make a movie out of it.

Expand full comment

wealthy ranchers and deadbeat cowboys did not shoot up the james gang and make northfield, MN safe for women and children. a bunch of farmers did that.

Expand full comment

Desperado In my youth, no cowboy movie showed Back or Hispanic cowboys, although they comprised at least 50% of the cowboy contingent. I believe that Sergeant Rutledge was the first cowboy movie in which Blacks were featured. Also the “Buffalo soldiers’—the 9th and 10th regiments of black soldiers who were most successful in hunting down Native American ‘renegades’—were not featured.

Regarding Teddy Roosevelt’s exploits in the Cuban war, it was the 10th regiment ofBlack soldiers that assured the taking of San Juan (Kettle) hill.

Expand full comment

❤️

Expand full comment

Sure hope so.

Expand full comment

Let's encourage them to all do more.

Expand full comment

It is the local where the futher of the federal will happen.

Expand full comment

Local government is where candidates are important. The repubs get it and have marketed their candidates. Local becomes regional becomes state. It is so important to understand that running for the school board or supporting those with your values matters.

Expand full comment

You are too pessimistic. The truth does penetrate. Truth is always a trailing indicator, but it wins in the end, because it is, well, true.

Expand full comment

Oh, Jon, I wish that were so. Truth may eventually be revealed, but in the meantime, people lose, they get sick, they die, their lives are turned upside down again and again. And sometimes the truth simply gets so buried and subsumed by lies that it gets lost. There is no undoing our history: even as the people who benefited from it are beginning to be willing to see the truth of it, most of the time they are unwilling to recognize the enormous costs still being borne by those who whose ancestors were the victims. So we get "performance" that does nothing to make real change.

Expand full comment

Agree, Jon. Always the truth wins.

Expand full comment

Where do you find pessimism Jon ? That's not a loaded question by me here; I want to understand your statement. Thx

Expand full comment

In the idea, which I hear over and over, that people on the other side, what used to be called the Great Unwashed, are irredeemable, that they cannot hear the truth and will reject if forever even if they do hear it.

Expand full comment

Truth usually does surface, but when is the question. I am not optimistic at all.

Expand full comment

What are you doing to change the odds?

Expand full comment

Keep in mind ALL America heard the "pussy tape" before TFG was elected and remained unswayed. There is nothing the cult-ified GOP can do or say to dismay its followers. Mental health experts will be dissecting this chapter for the next century.

Expand full comment

“Mental health experts will be dissecting this chapter for the next century.”

In nations of the Free World, outside of the former U.S.

Srsly, we are in the realm of (math) Book Burning & (“woke” CRT) NewSpeak here in Floriduh already.

Expand full comment

Here is an excellent comment in today's NYT about the latest tapes etc.:

"Aaron

San Francisco

April 22

DOJ and the Democrats either need to indict Trump or drop this topic. Enough. It has been almost 16 months since this career criminal tried to overthrown the American government. The political class in Washington seems to be more interested in protecting itself than brining the hammer of the law down on one of its own.

Indict Trump or go silent. Enough talk."

Expand full comment

I understand how people feel but the real world isn't like an episode of Law and Order.

16 months isn't that long, especially when trying to build a case against a former president.

Know what will happen if they charged him and they failed in court?

However, I think we need to be honest and understand that the con man will never face consequences.

I truly don't care if he get charged, my concern is keeping him out of the WH.

Also, we need to be talking to people and remind them what will happen if the republicans take back control.

You think they are going to just block everything Biden tries, nope, there are going to start special investigations against anyone they want.

If they take back control, we're all screwed.

So my energy is going into the mid terms making sure the people I know understand what's at stake and get off their lazy butts and vote.

Expand full comment

"Know what will happen if they charged him and they failed in court?"

How in heavens name can any self respecting prosecutor have the information that at the very least is public let alone whatever else the January 6th committee has and "fail in court?" The real risk to our lives is if these people (who have steadfastly lied about trying to overthrow the government) are not indicted and prosecuted, we absolutely lose the country because there is is no rule of law and we become like every other dictatorship. Paying homage to the likes of trump remains gobsmack repulsive and puzzling. It is not just us . . . watch France's elections on Sunday!

In the meantime, the dems (and anyone with a functioning brain cell) must stop pandering and hand wringing - take a page out of the repugs "play book" (which is pure BS), take off the gloves, and start fighting back - nothing illegal but for crying out loud make good trouble and a lot of noise and get the cabal in court!

Expand full comment

I used to equate the length of the Watergate hearings/resolution to the January 6 insurrection. I then realized I was using a apples to oranges comparison. The Untied States was a lot more different then ie we didn't have the meteoric rise of fascism we have today, we didn't have coup attempt and the internet, disinformation and a pandemic we have now. We are in a code red today.

Expand full comment

My brother worked for the McGovern campaign, and knew a lot of the Watergate details in 1972. The hearings didn't happen until 1974. Most people had no idea at all what happened until 1973, and many Republicans still don't think it was a big deal. Birds of a feather, and all that...

Expand full comment

indeed. and think about this, Watergate NEVER would have come to light without two Washington Post reporters.

Expand full comment

Beth, I write because I, too, have prioritized doing all I can to help Dems to hold the House and pick up at least 2 Senate seats this fall. Nonetheless, I would add, absent any meaningful nationwide voter protection safeguards, that turbo-charging turnout, specifically in the battleground states, is critical. Hence, in my view, we must prevail upon Senate Democratic leadership to pass at least a piece of Biden’s BBB social and climate package and present it to voters as a down payment of more to come if Dems win more seats this November.

Last, I would note, because we nearly are running out the clock on democracy, that Dems, this November, must be the party that captures the dynamic of the political conversation for the foreseeable future. Though I could continue writing, I don’t imagine there’s much to say that you don’t already know.

Expand full comment

Barbara, Though for several months there has been sufficient factual predication to open up a criminal investigation of Trump and his coterie, considering the January 6th Select Committee is scheduled within the next few weeks to conduct open hearings detailing its findings, this is not the time to go silent.

Expand full comment

Absolutely not. Except it's way past time to do something. People are immune to the findings without action.

Expand full comment

Barbara, We won’t know what to expect until the Committee commences its public hearings.

Expand full comment

Think how jaded people are. Mueller Report and 2 impeachments and this guy is still walking around trying to overturn Democracy from Mar a Largo.

Expand full comment

Barbara, I don’t doubt that your perceptions are valid. Still, because I don’t expect any indictments before the Select Committee’s public hearings this June, I, mostly, am focused on the latter.

Though this is a change of topic, I would note that my principal priority is prevailing upon Senate Democratic leadership to pass at least a piece of Biden’s BBB social and climate package as a down payment of more to come if Dems hold the House and pick up at least 2 Senate seats this fall.

Expand full comment

Timing is paramount. August and September may bring you some nice surprises.

Expand full comment

I think our "law"system is in far worse shape than we want to think. I think the GOP has been on a long range plan to steal/control our government since Nixon's "disgrace" and the "great second coming" of Reagan who shocked the world who thought, mistakenly, the GOP was a dead party for decades after Watergate.

With Reagan's "the Government is the enemy" and "the Government is NOT your friend" sound bites for 8 years, with the creation of right-wing "news" (aka propaganda) and social media outlets during the very same time, we have seen millions upon millions of voters leave the Democrat Party (who, in fact, fueled the mass exodus to the GOP by, literally, abandoning their Union based voters in favor of Corporations and Wall Street!). The 40 year result is today's 74-75 Million "Base" voters who SUPPORT the overthrow of our government.

Trump-ism is the result of 40 years of GOP working and controlling "the messaging" through their voter's favorite "news" sources. This has translated in Trump/GOP ability to, literally, being elected and, then, taking over EVERY Department of governance and oversight, least of which is the fundamental foundations of our nation: The Department of Justice and The Supreme Court.

President Ford's pardoning of Nixon pales to what The GOP has been able "to get away with" over the last 15-20 years. Again, this did not happen overnight. It has been an intentional, well planned, well orchestrated, business-like, step-by-step, year by year implementation of, as their stated goal (see the 1971 Lewis Powell Memo), "taking power back" once and for all from their "liberal socialist" enemies.

I wish all of this were not true. However, as the old cliche states, "the proof is in the pudding." This GOP/Trump pudding is reality because smart, intelligent people PLANNED for two generations and counting, a clear cut way to both get and, then, control power by, literally, taking over the mechanization's of Democracy at every level.

This is WHY, in my opinion, we and world has witnessed virtually no legal consequences for political deception, lies, corruption from Halliburton and the Iraq takeover, to The 2008 Crash and to everything we have seen under Trump-ism the last 4 years and counting.

Expand full comment

I 100% agree with you. McConnell sure has been playing the long game. He has not only seeded the Supreme Court he has seeded many levels of judges. And it has hobbled our judicial system. In other words. The bad guys (and gals) are running amok.

Expand full comment

Bradford, you are precisely correct with much of what you've said above ↑ in something of an incomplete, sort of outline form. The democratic party leadership has been stunned and absolutely feckless - at best. Some of that is 'our fault' too. We've failed to incubate and nurture real leaders and honest self evaluation for far too long. "We" allowed the tail (dem leadership) to wag the dog (us) for far too long, too content and too busy to do our due diligence, vainly hoping and trusting business would take care of itself among a (professional ?) party political class setting the route 'and' driving the car, so to speak. Said another way, we allowed them (party leadership) to believe their own BS; that winning 'minds' was enough, that political science college educated fountains of logic were enough to succeed. It's not and you know it; they might get the minds of the like minded in one self affirming echo chamber, yet blindly, ignore the 'other' necessary ingredient of successful, actual leadership - the hearts. It takes some mix of the two for working formula.

Expand full comment

Those "smart" people also had the help of a sneaky Russian pirate who seduced them with women and gold.

Expand full comment

Barbara, sorry, I don't buy this. More sweeping things under the rug will not fix anything. Especially when the real purpose of doing something like that is so that some people can go back to feeling comfortable while other people have to live with the fallout. No, we do not let go of this. We keep it open for as long as it takes. Because if we don't, we give permission for it to happen again. We know that because that's what we've done before, and here we are again. Enough avoiding doing what needs to be done.

Expand full comment

Shit or get off the pot, Merrick Garland

Expand full comment

It's a good thing people are getting impatient. When the Dems drop the political bomb just before the election, it will take down Steven Miller, Bill Barr and a bunch of other Opus Dei as well. I can hardly wait.

Expand full comment

Ian, While your observations are spot on, I would submit that we can’t afford to spend calories on the segment of the population that is so invested in a single, fixed point of view that it vigorously will defend against any information that departs from what it thinks it already knows. Hence, I advocate for spending calories on what I believe is a larger segment that truly is invested in obtaining the necessary information to help resolve our problems.

Additionally, though admittedly there are exceptions, I’m finding even so-called mainstream media outlets prioritizing strong, honest, and accurate reporting aimed at getting as close as possible to the verifiable truth.

Expand full comment

'Marjorie Taylor Greene Claims She Was Abducted by Jewish Spaceship on January 6th'

'April 22, 2022'

''Marjorie Taylor Greene holds her hand up to testify. There is a U.S. flag behind her.'

'ATLANTA (The Borowitz Report)—The Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene testified on Friday that she could not have played a part in the January 6, 2021, insurrection because she had been abducted by a Jewish spaceship earlier that day.'

“I was walking down the street, minding my own business, when suddenly a Jewish teleporting beam levitated me into the hull of the orbiter,” she said'

'Once abducted, she testified, she found herself in the presence of the Rothschild banking family, all dressed in silver spacesuits.'

'“They had this big panel with flashing lights and knobs on it that they were using to control the government, the news media, and the entertainment industry,” she said.'

'After observing her for several hours, the Rothschilds returned her to Earth unharmed, she said.'

“My biggest fear was that the Rothschilds had implanted something in my head to control my mind the way they control wildfires,” she testified. “Fortunately, my brain is the same as it’s always been.” (Satire, NewYorker)

Expand full comment

I can't imagine a Jewish spaceship wanting anything to do with MTG

Expand full comment

A case of mistaken identity? Wrong Greene.

Expand full comment

Good point!

Expand full comment

🤣

Expand full comment

🗽🧑🏼‍⚖️🔔

Expand full comment

So clever our new Liberty Belle. Like fresh homemade bread. My 94 year old girlfriend,Birdie, walked over to see last years colt and said by the way I brought you a loaf of bread hot out of the oven. I built her a new screen door the next day. A very clever girl.

Expand full comment

Cannot wait to meet her and take home a loaf of 'fresh homemade bread'. Still cooking at 94 years of age! Here's to you both.

Expand full comment

She is a nurse, like you.

Expand full comment

Hahaha hahahahahhhaaahhhhga aaahhhaa timeout!

Expand full comment

You are benched!

Expand full comment

Worth it.

Expand full comment

That's almost as believable as her testimony!

What a sad piece of work!

Expand full comment

Did you recognize that the piece was noted as a 'satire' of her testimony ?

Expand full comment

i'm not sure what you're referring to - I was referring to seeing her actual testimony on MSNBC and CNN.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Cecile. I didn't know whether you were referring to her testimony or the satire

Expand full comment

I'm glad to have cleared that up.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this!

Expand full comment

What would you all do if you were at a business receiving a service and Newsmax was playing on TV and you suspected that the business wasn't aware of Newsmax's bias? I was in a Nail Salon owned and operated by people who were Asian American. Would you let a manager know what type of news organization Newsmax is and its role in spreading hateful sentiment for the Asian Community? Or, would you not say anything?

Edit: this establishment is in a very diverse area represented by Congresswoman Cori Bush.

Expand full comment

Thank you, everyone! I will definitely stop by there and talk to the manager. I will be very humble so they know I am there to help and not preach. I'll let you know what happens.

Expand full comment

I definitely would say something

Expand full comment

I would certainly say something like “I’m fascinated you are playing that channel. Did you know they were a prime source of anti-Asian hate speech and propaganda over the last 3 years?” And then potentially ask them why they choose to play it - for insight into their perspective. Informed is armed.

Expand full comment

Silence is consent.

Expand full comment

If you say something, let us know what happens.

Expand full comment

RUF, If one believes democracy starts with each individual taking responsibility for one’s family, for one’s community, for the environment in which one finds oneself, whether at work or in a religious or an educational or even a social environment, then, barring exceptional circumstances, one must speak his or her mind.

Expand full comment

A less confrontational with more room for actual education might be to explain your concern in the form of a respectful letter. This letter would be something they could read over and over and chew on and refer back to while they consider what you are trying to convey.

Expand full comment

Disagree, in this case. RuftotheRescue has a personal connection to this business as a customer. Sending a letter distances his feelings of concern and would make it more likely to be taken as a judgemental criticism.

I like that RUF sees it the way he does: as a supportive customer who is himself offended by the bias, and sharing that concern with the manager of the business. Keeping it on a personal level of concern, rather than sounding like a pretentious white man "saving" the ignorant asians.

Expand full comment

Of course it could also turn into a “Karen” moment too when face to face. RUF could personally hand them a letter so they’d know they were a valuable customer. Always different ways to look at it. I respect that.

Expand full comment

I would say something with respect.

Expand full comment

I just checked in the written FOX News. ZERO mention of any of this. They are definitely on a DeSantis worship theme. No mention of trump.

Expand full comment

That is why it is important for all to repost everywhere possible.

Expand full comment

... Re-post, calmly educate and advocate; fearlessly at every opportunity.

Expand full comment

Because the newsletter offers information on a number of things going on, it is also helpful to do small pieces crediting HCR - along with a photo. People seem to have shorter attention spans these days.

Expand full comment

Or none at all… it’s almost like many are shell-shocked, if not energized on the Repub side…. Texas at it’s worst.

Expand full comment

Jeri, the only hope for Texas is that more progressives move there from blue states. I say this as a native Texan who moved away for years, then returned for 15. With retirement, thank God, we have finally left Texas for good. Being 75, I could see no real change coming in my lifetime regardless of how many marches I attended, how many signs I made, how many new voters I registered, or how many Republicans I tried to talk to. Maybe Beto can make a difference.

Expand full comment

I have set up a second Twitter account for the purpose of defeating false information, however tiny it may be in the larger universe. @DDisinformation (stands for Dis Disinformation). Feel free to go there.

Expand full comment

The EU is is focusing on a huge bill addressing hate speech, disinformation, and harmful online content. Congress here remains divided on efforts to deal with disinformation. I applaud Obama for getting out in front to speak about it.

Expand full comment

How do we make it popular to want to know the truth once again? It feels like we’ve suffered a pandemic of fakery

Expand full comment

Has been true for longer than chump

Expand full comment

What you say is correct. But our system gives them numerous legal defenses. Fighting liars and traitors on the battlefield chosen by them will take years and by then the pendulum of history will have swung too far to the right, where it might be stuck for a while. The answer is to pour sufficient resources and energy into the campaigns of the opponents of Greene, Cawthorn, DeSantis and similar Republicans so that they are soundly defeated at the polls on November 8. (Not allowing Greene to run would probably increase support for whomever replaces her on the ballot.) If it cannot be accomplished that way, we will have to wait for the pendulum to swing back a few generations from now. (As I have said numerous times, winning at the polls requires a massive turnout of women voters and of persons of color.)

Expand full comment

With their tunnel vision sources of information, I picture the R base as the three monkeys. “See no evil” and “Hear no evil” have their hands firmly over eyes and ears. Unfortunately, “Speak no evil” is shouting their nonsense loud enough to be heard around the world.

Expand full comment

Like the shrieking Nazgûl beasts

Expand full comment

The worst part: The fringe has now become mainstream.

Expand full comment

Ian Sirota -

We have the three branches of government. I’ll add a dark horse. The press.

Box of worms that last statement, I understand. But as the un-press (Fox, wannabes, and cheap suit copycats) avoids truth, there are the ample direct news sources that DO tell the truth.

And because humans are social, please don’t forget the power of the coffee mess or water cooler. The news (truth) is available. Whether people WANT to pay attention is a whole other discussion.

What I’m most afraid of is apathy.

Shame on us for apathy.

I’m holding on to the hope that the press the world over will keep our politicals from collapsing our House.

Sure am sorry to see our nation in this conundrum.

😢

Expand full comment

Worse. It’s dangerous.

Expand full comment

Totally agree.

Expand full comment

“The only one who matters is Trump, [a]nd if Trump is fine, it's not an issue.”

That there folks, is what we call a cult.

Expand full comment

How sick is that Mr Mcarthy?? I fancy myself a good nurse, but this will take a boatload of koolaid antidote and some serious intervention to get you out of this mess.

Expand full comment

As sick as the Germans who lost their reasoning for Hitler

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

For McCarthy is about fear. Fear of losing power. Fear of TFG. Fear TFG’s supporters showing up in mass at his office and home and Jan 6th~ing him.

Expand full comment

He certainly missed that boat Karen. Remember when the nurses go south you go south!

Expand full comment

As sick as the first one, may Kevin suffer the same fate, quickly

Expand full comment

Has been from Day one, or whenever he said that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue…. That cemented the crazies, the RNC came next.

Expand full comment

Jeri, As a one time NYer, I never found his character revealed in news stories, puff pieces or interviews, to be anything more than cringeworthy. It was said that as a young man he professed admiration for crime boss toughness. Well he now has his own

mob in our very own republic party. We had better hope Dems and voters carefully vet their own candidates to prevent further spread of this disease.

Expand full comment

It appears the fact that we all need to accept is there is a group of people in this country who LOVE Trump, no matter what he does or says. For whatever reasons, he appeals to them. The other fact we know is that a number of R's don't love him and see the truth of the man along with most Dem's who can't stand him. For this one core group Trump is their man. The One. For me and most of the rest of us, I see multiple, very capable and intelligent people capable of being in serious leadership positions in the D party. Conversely I see very few R's that I'd trust beyond a Congressional seat.

Expand full comment

I see very few R’s that I would trust with a congressional seat. Or a dog catcher badge…

Expand full comment

Especially now...because the ones you might trust in elected office for the most part are not brave enough to publicly not follow Trump or endorse him. Our Gov. Hogan in MD never got on the Trump bandwagon and in a Blue state has served two terms...and I can live with a lot of what he has done. Now we have an overwhelming D House & Senate that could override his vetoes. But he has been closer to a classic moderate Republican conservative. He gained respect from me when he said he would sign anti-fracking legislation...which helped get it out of a committee controlled by a Dem Senator who was trying to roadblock and sandbag the anti-fracking bill coming out of her committee. The R's aren't all bad. But a bunch of them are lost.

Expand full comment

Hi, Jeri. There's a part of this fine old Magnolia from central Alabama that knows, beyond any doubt. that the core problem with Mr. Trump and his ilk is that they are unspeakably TACKY. Your Mama wouldn't have them to dinner.

Expand full comment

LOL Tacky is as tacky does.

Expand full comment

Reminds me of the home I drove by today on a road that borders an ocean inlet where million dollar homes are not uncommon. There was a trailer with lots of junk in the yard and what looked like about 50 different Trump flags of every size all over the yard. I don’t have a pristine yard, and don’t expect others too, so I’m not being judgy. I’m just, WTFF. It’s like they can’t say “who” they are, loud enough, or long enough. Someday, I hope my understanding of the cause is crystal clear in my brain. Some days I feel like I almost get it and then poof it’s gone. Today I’m baffled.

Expand full comment

Good morning, Christy, I think keeping us baffled is a huge part of the situation we're living in. And for all the empathy I can find for the people who support Trump and his Ilk--rich and poor--there comes a point at which I have not and cannot walk in their shoes. It's that little area that shuts down my ability to understand. I believe that, at bottom, it honestly does make sense and a lot of us are trying to find the logic in something that ism't logical.

Expand full comment

Dean, I appreciate your comment very much. I’m guessing you meant to say that it honestly does NOT make sense. I absolutely agree with that. I do think neuroscience is getting closer to understanding evil. Whether we can figure out how to use that information to save humanity in time is a question too scary for me to consider.

Expand full comment

As mentioned before, trumplicans qualify as a cult. Here is one person's definition of a cult. Each segment could easily be translated to the trumplican party members behaviors in order to be in the club. Dear Kevin Mc. started to stray from the cult with critical thinking skills, and then the mad, orange idol brought him immediately back into the fold. It just took some time with the cult leader and a little stay at Mar a Loco (en la cabeza) to get his critical thinking skills wiped out of his frontal lobe.

Try to match what you have witnessed in the trumplicans--a brain teaser this morning that is pretty easy:

10 Signs You’re Probably In A Cult

Cults aren’t as easy to spot as you might think. Most cults don’t wear robes or live in communes. In fact, most cult members don’t even realize they’re in a cult.

During my 25 years as an unwitting cult member, I would often watch documentaries and read about other cults. As I researched, I noticed 10 specific patterns that helped me recognize that I myself was in a cult:

1. The leader is the ultimate authority

If you’re not allowed to criticize your leader, even if the criticism is true, you’re probably in a cult.

Cults begin with a charismatic leader who claims some supreme knowledge. They may call themselves a prophet, messiah, messenger, or an enlightened teacher. They can also be CEOs, military officials, politicians, and self-help gurus.

Cult leaders convince members to forfeit their critical thinking ability in return for a sense of belonging, authority, and purpose. To members, it doesn’t matter what the evidence or logic may suggest, the leader is always right, and their misdeeds are always justified. Criticism of the leader is forbidden.

2. The group suppresses skepticism

If you’re only allowed to study your organization through approved sources, you’re probably in a cult.

CULTS VIEW CRITICAL THINKING AS AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE and every effort is made to suppress it. Doubting members are encouraged to isolate themselves from outside influences and focus solely on the doctrine of the cult.

CRITICISM IS FORBIDDEN. People who contradict the group are viewed as persecutors and are often given labels like “anti,” “apostate,” or “suppressive person.” Members are discouraged from consuming any material that is critical of the group.

3. The group delegitimizes former members

If you can’t think of a legitimate reason for leaving your group, you’re probably in a cult.

Because the cult considers itself the ultimate authority on truth, it can’t imagine anybody leaving it with their integrity intact. Thus, it has to perpetuate a false narrative that former members were deceived, proud, immoral, or lazy.

If former members speak out, they are dismissed as bitter, angry, dishonest or evil. Cults often impose some kind of shunning to shame former members and prevent them from infecting other members with the truth.

4. The group is paranoid about the outside world

If your group insists the end of the world is near, you’re probably in a cult.

Cults position themselves as the sole refuge from an evil outside world that is intent on their destruction. Cults thrive on conspiracy theories, catastrophic thinking, and persecution complexes.

In an effort to draw in more paying members, cults are often very aggressive in their recruitment efforts which are usually justified as “saving” people from the evil world. Those who reject the cult’s message are unelect, prideful, evil, or stupid.

5. The group relies on shame cycles

If you need your group in order to feel worthy, loved, or sufficient, you’re probably in a cult.

Cult leaders trap members in shame cycles by imposing abnormally strict codes of conduct (usually prescriptions about diet, appearance, sex, relationships, media), guilting members for their shortcomings, and then positioning themselves as the unique remedy to the feelings of guilt which they themselves created.

Cult members are made to believe they are insufficient or unworthy on their own and that the only way to become worthy is to confess their shortcomings to the group or leader. The leader then becomes the meditiator of worthiness and the foundation of the member’s self esteem.

Leaders who can make followers feel bad about anything can use shame to manipulate followers into doing anything, even if it’s against their own self-interest or better judgment.

6. The leader is above the law

If you’re held to a different moral standard, specifically in regard to sex, you’re probably in a cult.

A prevalent idea among cult leaders is that they are above the law, be it human or divine. This idea allows them to exploit their followers economically and sexually without repercussions.

When confronted, they do not confess, but create justifications for their impropriety. Sexual grooming of members is common. Loyal cult members will perform any amount of “mental gymnastics” to justify or ignore the leader’s behavior.

7. The group uses “thought reform” methods

If your serious questions are answered with cliches, you’re probably in a cult.

Indoctrination or “brainwashing” is the process through which a cult slowly breaks down a person’s sense of identity and ability to think rationally. Behaviors like excessive fasting, prayer, hypnosis, scripture reading, chanting, meditation, or drug usage can all be used to increase a person’s vulnerability to the leader’s suggestions.

The hallmark of indoctrination is the use of thought-terminating cliches. Platitudes like “follow the leader” or “doubt your doubts” are regurgitated over and over so that members don’t have to critically analyze complex issues.

8. The group is elitist

If your group is the solution for all the world’s problems, you’re probably in a cult.

Cults see themselves as the enlightened, chosen, and elect organization tasked with radically transforming individual lives and the entire world.

This elitism creates greater sense of group unity and responsibility centered on a united purpose. However, this sense of responsibility is often manipulated by cult leaders who coerce members into risky financial behavior, sexual favors, free manual labor, or heightened recruitment efforts in order to “further the cause.”

9. There is no financial transparency

If you’re not allowed to know what the group does with their money, you’re probably in a cult.

A group that refuses to disclose its finances is a huge red flag. Ethical organizations have nothing to hide. Cult leaders tend to live opulently while their followers are required to make financial sacrifices. Members are often encouraged to pay their offerings even if it means putting their families at risk.

10. The group performs secret rites

If there are secret teachings or ceremonies you didn’t discover until after you joined, you’re probably in a cult.

Cults use secret rituals as rites of passage that solidify a member’s loyalty to the group. Initiation into these rites usually only comes after a member has undergone certain tests or made adequate financial contributions.

Often, cult initiations are confusing, bizarre, or even offensive. This mental dissonance between their sense of confusion and their loyalty to the “inner circle” convinces the initiate to double their efforts in order to properly appreciate the proceedings. This only further entrenches them in a shame cycle, making them even more susceptible to manipulation.

926

Expand full comment

Excellent comment!

Sure sounds like the GQP to me. And there are all sorts of cults out there. Humans have a desperate need to worship totally - to completely follow and believe in. There is the Cult of Putin. And there is the Cult of Disney. There are many thousands of people who worship at the altar of Mickey Mouse in Orlando. Their devotion to Disney - its entire infrastructure - is religious in tone and dedication.

I think Putin has made an enormous mistake - the mysteries of where all those sailors went (down with the ship, of course) and where all those army conscripts are (in mass graves or rotting on the side of road) are creating serious alarm and resentment in Mother Russia. All leaders have a limited run. Just ask the Romanovs.

I think DeSantis just made a huge mistake declaring war on Mickey Mouse. There is a huge swath of Americans who don't give a hoot about politics - but make trouble for their "church"? Not a deft move by the punk who would be governor. Charlie Christ just got a huge campaign gift.

As to TFG? It is not my nature to wish physical difficulties on anyone. But if he were to remove himself from the scene by eating too many cheeseburgers, we would still have the cult. TFG is just a clever self indulgent figurehead. The cult has always been with us. Joseph McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan have all been leaders of this cult. It has a momentum all it's own. It rolls on hate for the other, fear of the other. It thinks everything is a zero sum game. It believes its prosperity is stolen by "new people" or different people. It is easy to push along and grow. Many insecure people love to hate. They hunger for someone to demonize rather than seeking folks to love. I'll stop now before I launch an endless tirade about religious cults. BTW, where is the organized religion that cloaks itself in "loving thy brother" but starves him and won't offer him shelter...etc. Lets him die in the desert, separates him from his children. I said I would stop.

Expand full comment

I am with you on all of the above, Bill. And I know people of whom Disney is their religion. Desandbag has stomped on something that is going to bite him in the petutie, I bet. Never mess with Americans and Their Magic Kingdom!!

The chap that wrote the article on what a cult is writes from being raised as a Mormon...he knows what he is talking about. As a therapist, I have had to deal with former cult members from Mormonism to really, really awful satanic ritual abuse stuff that is soul-destroying and so traumatizing for those I serve as well as myself. In my first experience with trying to support those stuck in this dark side, an expert in NYC I consulted with told me to be really careful and stay away from families and people involved in the dark side and cults. He would not explain any further, he just said, stay away from them. Of course it made me way too curious and I studied cults and how to help former cult members with Elizabeth Kubler-Ross. I also grew up on the west coast and where there were breeding grounds in CA and OR for cults. It was so easy to learn about them and meet people who had escaped. We are already beginning to see trumplican cult members leaving the fold and talking about it. Guess McCarthy won't be one of them.... until he is prosecuted.

Expand full comment

One thing we need to be cautious about is religious diversity. As a therapist I have had people work with spiritual concerns even though they were still within their religious communities, including some of those named here. Altemeyer also notes that although many Evangelicals rate high in his Right Wing Authoritarian scale there are leaders we all admire who are not authoritarian, including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Jimmy Carter, among others. Also faith itself is often held suspect, although large numbers of people have Spiritually Transformative Experiences STEs, and may struggle to integrate them.

Expand full comment

Yes, Gary, what you are describing is different from a cult. I am not talking about Christians with big "C's" like Jimmy or MLK. I am talking about the radicals who go way overboard or fall into a charismatic leadership that strays very far from Jesus's reported teachings and drags innocents with them into very dark places. Any religion or spiritual path can go too far, particularly when led by narcissists who can get drunk with the power that their followers give to them. "Question authority" is a good mantra for anyone following any kind of leader. And then add: "Use your noodle." ;-)

Expand full comment

This excellent information. I'll add the following:

Types of Propaganda

1. Ad hominem: attacking opponents rather than opponents’ ideas or principles

2. Ad nauseam: repeating ideas relentlessly so that the audience becomes inured to them

3. Appeal to authority: use of authority figures (or perceived authority figures like celebrities) to support ideas

4. Appeal to fear: exploitation of audience anxieties or concerns

5. Appeal to prejudice: exploitation of an audience’s desire to believe that it is virtuous or morally or otherwise superior

6. Bandwagon: exploitation of an audience’s desire to conform by encouraging adherence to or acceptance of idea that is supposedly garnering widespread or universal support

7. Beautiful people: depiction of attractive famous people or happy people to associate success or happiness with adherence to an idea or cause or purchase of a product

8. Black-and-white fallacy: presentation of only two alternatives, one of which is identified as undesirable

9. Classical conditioning: association of an idea with another stimulus

10. Cognitive dissonance: using a favorable stimulus to prompt acceptance of an unfavorable one, or producing an unfavorable association

11. Common man: adoption of mannerisms and/or communication of principles that suggest affinity with the average person

12. Cult of personality: creation of an idealized persona, or exploitation of an existing one, as a spokesperson for an idea or a cause

13. Demonizing the enemy: dehumanizing or otherwise denigrating opponents to sway opinion

14. Dictat: mandating adherence to an idea or cause by presenting it as the only viable alternative

15. Disinformation: creating false accounts or records, or altering or removing existing ones, to engender support for or opposition to an idea or cause

16. Door in the face: seeking compliance with a request by initially requesting a greater commitment and then characterizing the desired outcome as a compromise or a minor inconvenience

17. Euphoria: generating happiness or high morale by staging a celebration or other motivating event or offer

18. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt: disseminating false or negative information to undermine adherence to an undesirable belief or opinion

19. Flag waving: appealing to nationalism or patriotism

20. Foot in the door: manipulation by encouraging a small gift or sacrifice, which establishes a bond that can be exploited to extract more significant compliance

21. Glittering generalities: applying emotionally appealing but vague / meaningless words to an idea or cause

22. Half-truth: making a statement that is partly true or only part of the truth, or is otherwise deceptive

23. Inevitable victory: assurance of uncommitted audience members and reassurance of committed audience members that an idea or cause will prevail

24. Join the crowd: communication intended to persuade the audience to support an idea or cause because it is or will be the dominant paradigm

25. Labeling or name-calling: using euphemistic terms to encourage a positive or negative perception of a person, an idea, or a cause

26. Latitudes of acceptance: introducing an extreme point of view to encourage acceptance of a more moderate stance, or establishing a barely moderate stance and gradually shifting to an extreme position

27. The lie: false information that justifies an action or a belief and/or encourages acceptance of it

28. Love bombing: isolation of the target audience from general society within an insular group that devotes attention and affection to the target audience to encourage adherence to an idea or cause

29. Managing the news: influencing news media by timing messages to one’s advantage, reinterpreting controversial or unpopular actions or statements (also called spinning), or repeating insubstantial or inconsequential statements that ignore a problem (also called staying on message)

30. Milieu control: using peer or social pressure to engender adherence to an idea or cause; related to brainwashing and mind control

31. Obfuscation: communication that is vague and ambiguous, intended to confuse the audience as it seeks to interpret the message, or to use incomprehensibility to exclude a wider audience

32. Operant conditioning: indoctrination by presentation of attractive people expressing opinions or buying products

33. Oversimplification: offering generalities in response to complex questions

34. Pensée unique (French for “single thought”): repression of alternative viewpoints by simplistic arguments

35. Quotes out of context: selective use of quotations to alter the speaker’s or writer’s intended meaning or statement of opinion

36. Rationalization: use of generalities or euphemisms to justify actions or beliefs

37. Red herring: use of irrelevant data or facts to fallaciously validate an argument

38. Reductio ad Hitlerum: persuasion of an audience to change its opinion by identifying undesirable groups as adherents of the opinion, thus associating the audience with such groups

39. Repetition: repeated use of a word, phrase, statement, or image to influence the audience

40. Scapegoating: blaming a person or a group for a problem so that those responsible for it are assuaged of guilt and/or to distract the audience from the problem itself and the need to fix it

41. Selective truth: restrictive use of data or facts to sway opinion that might not be swayed if all the data or facts were given

42. Sloganeering: use of brief, memorable phrases to encapsulate arguments or opinions on an emotional rather than a logical level

43. Stereotyping: incitement of prejudice by reducing a target group, such as a segment of society or people adhering to a certain religion, to a set of undesirable traits

44. Straw man: misrepresentation of an undesirable argument or opinion, or misidentifying an undesirable persona or an undesirable single person as representative of that belief, or oversimplifying the belief

45. Testimonial: publicizing of a statement by an expert, authority figure, or celebrity in support of an idea, cause, or product in order to prompt the audience to identify with the person and support the idea or cause or buy the product

46. Third party: use of a supposedly impartial person or group, such as a journalist or an expert, or a group falsely represented as a grassroots organization, to support an idea or cause or recommend a product

47. Thought-terminating cliché: use of a truism to stifle dissent or validate faulty logic

48. Transfer: association of an entity’s positive or negative qualities with another entity to suggest that the latter entity embodies those qualities

49. Unstated assumption: implicit expression of an idea or cause by communication of related concepts without expressing the idea or cause

50. Virtue words: expression of words with positive connotations to associate an idea or cause with the self- perceived values of the audience

Expand full comment

This is excellent to create memes to use to thwart lies and propaganda! Well done! I am going to use this in my trumplican cult work!

Expand full comment

Thank you. Familiar with many, of course, but have not put them all together. Excellent reference …did you compile this yourself?

Expand full comment

No I did not compile this. Can't remember where I got it. (oops.) I keep a file of stuff that I think is useful.)

Expand full comment

Barbara, that’s a terrific list! Are you its source?

Expand full comment

No! And I lost the source. I will try and find find the author.

Expand full comment

Like

Expand full comment

What you write is interesting. You mentioned you were in a cult for years. What made you realize that finally and leave?

Expand full comment

I never mentioned I was in a cult! I have studied them and worked with some who have been in cults. I was obsessed with WWII (read Anne Frank at 9) and how an entire country could be duped by Hitler's propaganda. My critical thinking skills saved me from religion at that age when by my newly reborn Godmother tried to put a crucifix above my bed. I was appalled to have this man nailed to the cross and bleeding above my bed. She said that Jesus was crucified and died for my sins. Then I asked what "sin" is. She told me it was all the bad things I had done. I thought she had lost her mind! I was only nine years old (for Christ's sake!). I had never done anything in my life that someone would be crucified to purify me. What hogwash. Her love was so deep that she left and I never saw her again. That is when I learned about one sort of Chrisitianity. Then I learned of what Jesus' teachings were, and most seemed like basic truths and Golden Rule stuff that I agreed with because it matched The Golden Rule creed I had within my being. But the dogmatic cult stuff was way over the top for me.

I thank that strong part of myself for having critical thinking skills and a strong sense of self at a young age despite of what our culture tried to pound into me as a female, lesser part of the species. And I also think all my experiences and obsessions of history from that time are paying off as I view and write/speak about what we are witnessing and working with/against in this country today. I recognized McConnell land there repubs a long time ago and tfg as a cult figure immediately when I saw his first rally. A blatant, baby Hitler all over again.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this. I am now reading The Authoritarians by Bob Altemeyer, a retired psychology professor who makes his book available for free. He studied authoritarian thinking for four decades in a rigorous way. Last night I read his summary of his research findings on fundamentalists, many of whom score high in his Right Wing Authoritarian scale. Many, like you, find their way out of cults. You can download a PDF of his book for free -- with his blessing ;-) -- here: https://www.evcforum.net/DataDropsite/TheAuthoritarians.pdf or buy his book at low cost directly from the publisher, here: https://www.lulu.com/en/us/shop/bob-altemeyer/the-authoritarians/paperback/product-1mq99km.html?page=1&pageSize=4

I began to study cults many years ago when I was caught up in some cult-like groups and found that they didn't meet my core sense of truth either. Altemeyer has a review I have yet to read of the early explorations into the cult mindset.

I just came upon this, which may also be of interest:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/measuring-the-authoritarian-mind-set-of-trumps-followers/2020/10/01/23490cc8-ea38-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html

Expand full comment

Thanks, Gary!

Expand full comment

Pensa, I pulled a quote from what you wrote above. Perhaps it’s a copy and paste from another source, but the way you present it sounds as if you are writing of yourself: “During my 25 years as an unwitting cult member, I would often watch documentaries and read about other cults. As I researched, I noticed 10 specific patterns that helped me recognize that I myself was in a cult:”

Expand full comment

Sorry Christy, I must have written that a bit awkwardly. What I referred to was cut and pasted. My second sentence reads: " Here is one person's definition of a cult." Should have put the colon but then I wrote a bit more to give ideas of the 10 points I pasted. I was in a hurry and usually cite my resources. Here it is belatedly! by Sam,& Tanner: https://medium.com/@zelphontheshelf/10-signs-youre-probably-in-a-cult-1921eb5a3857

Expand full comment

Yes, that’s what made me ask the question.

Expand full comment

Pensa, I would like very much to get together with you over coffee or lunch and talk. Could you drop me a note via FB Messenger?

Expand full comment

Oh, I can be reached at DecencyandDemocracy@gmail.com. Then I can share my person contact information so we can get together, Annie! that would be great. I do not have access to FB. They appear to have dropped me because I cannot access the email I originally opened the account with. So much for advanced technology!

Expand full comment

I had to go back and look at that too. I think the "During my 25 years as an unwitting cult member" was from the article Pensa was sharing.

Expand full comment

Interesting, MLM, I, too, thought Pensa had implied they’d extracted themselves from a cult. I’ll have to go back and read the original comment. …

Expand full comment

Our 21st C. Cosa Nostra?!

Expand full comment

So the Trump-loving core group is outnumbered on all sides. Aren't they? And if not, then what's going on?

Expand full comment

There are congressional districts his "people" are going to win. Even though I see less of his signs and banners in rural areas than before, there are pockets where you find them clumped together. Many of the elected R's who really don't like him, won't speak out against him for fear of losing their primary. Liz Cheney is one of the few. Back when Trump was winning his first primary races he was only getting 20% of the vote...but it was a large field and 20% was enough. He was famous from TV. I'd love to know how much of his core base, were fans of the Apprentice ? Now he's trying to intimidate others to not run. He's obviously ruthless and will use any tactic to divide and conquer. Custer was successful for a number years, until he wasn't...and it ended badly for him and his troopers. I think DJT's Little Big Horn moment is coming. It's just a matter of where and when.

Expand full comment

Been waiting, but I’m old.

Expand full comment

Old and tired and sometimes, discouraged after so many years of this war. Thanks Jeri

Expand full comment

Little Big Horn? on horseback? Nice picture, but slow. I'd like to be able to live long enough to see it.

Expand full comment

LOL, Anne-Louise! As someone who has horses, I will say they may or may not be slow by today's standard, but their kick can be very deadly.

Expand full comment

Not to mention a sneaky way of swinging the head right round, ears back and teeth bared, as you try to withdraw your foot out of reach behind or even above the saddle.

Expand full comment

They’re smarter than some humans.

Expand full comment

🐎...and usually deserved.

Expand full comment

Everything moves faster today. Custer was arrogant and media seeking like Trump. He was used to getting out of close calls and then one day 5,000 Indians who had never fought together before, came together under Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse and surrounded Custer in an impossible situation. History does repeat itself. Personally I believe Trump will flee the country because his situation will become untenable.

Expand full comment

That last sentence floored me

Expand full comment

Excellent possibility, I see run run or hanged. Don’t forget what Custer told the North Dakotans. “Play dumb till I get Back”.

Expand full comment

I think so, too, and have for a long time. The problem he might have is where? (Not asking. Just who would want him and the drama in their country at this point?)

Expand full comment

Yes but how does that look if they go on winning elections? The senatorial election are not effected by gerrymandering for instance.

Expand full comment

Morning, Stuart!! How does it look for tomorrow's election? Do you think Le Pen has a chance of winning?

Expand full comment

Morning, Lynell. Spent the night in a favourite hotel near Beaune on our way back to Paris for my wife to vote. Macron has chain-ganged the whole media, promised everything to everybody...as a shepherd to his sheep before sending them to the butcher...and he will pass in all likelihood. His humiliation comes from only squeaking through despite his fear-mongering and then from his impotence from having no power when he lacks a majority to govern. Welcome to a chaotic summer and autumn. It wouldn't be any different if she wins.

Expand full comment

Indeed it will be different if she wins. Bye bye NATO. Hard to believe that France could elect a Putin toadie. Well, same with Boris and Chump, so much “hard to believe” these days.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your take, Stuart; although, I read one news article that predicted if Le Pen wins it will mean the end of NATO and support for Ukraine. Hyperbole?

Expand full comment

I’ve been to Beaune twice. Loved it. What is your favorite hotel?

Expand full comment

Isn't part of what's going on just the volume principle? Making noise. gets attention

Expand full comment

Absolutely. And making enough noise creates so much chaos that no one is able to think. It's almost as simple as the sound level at a big concert or even going into a crowded restaurant except mul/tiplied. That kind of "noise" is one of the first strategies of an authoritarian coup, long before any actual, possibly recognizable, moves to take over. And we have had it for 5-6 years now, uninterrupted. It's devious.

Expand full comment

They love TFG because he has made them feel “special” again, their grievance of being forgotten, unheard, and discounted, is being exploited. It seems new to us, but it’s the oldest strategy of Populism. Therefore the issue needing the most focus is inequality. Given the landscape, we can only get there in November.

Expand full comment

The last time I actually threw a man the distance was fourth row up, approx. 8 feet as the raven flies. That’s how far I will ever trust the bastards. Keep them close enough to grab both tonsils.

Expand full comment

Yes, it has been a cult from day one. It still is impossible for me to my head around the fact there are congressional people, representing fairly significant swaths of the population, who blatantly pay homage to a madman and that their constituents go along with the horror and will stop at nothing. Something we have seen throughout history.

Expand full comment

Trump seems to have become their voice. There's a lot of angry people. He's big in coal & oil country and with very conservative people. In many ways he's a snake oil salesman and tent preacher, who has nothing in common with them. He just needs the adulation. He'll say anything to feel loved and to take their money.

Expand full comment

I'm afraid so. Believe, don't ask questions.

Expand full comment

Have you read The Cult of Trump by Steven Hassan? He's devoted his life to help people deprogram from cults.

Expand full comment

I will check that out. Thank you Deb

Expand full comment

I get a weekly newsletter from him filled with lots of great info. https://freedomofmind.com/newsletter/fom-newsletter-4-19-22/

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link Christy. It looks interesting.

Expand full comment

Governor Insantis' "laws" aren't going to hold up in court. His "redistricting" violates state law even with his appointees there on the court. His Disney attack won't hold up because it violates state law. He may look like the cheapest used car dealer in Florida, but he went to Yale and Harvard Law, and he knows that all this is just performative bullshit. Which is what makes him actually far worse than That Fucking Guy.

What is terrifying is watching this crap metastasize before us. None of what he did this week was anything the traitors were thinking of doing six weeks ago, and now that unhappy horseshit is in the "mainstream" of this seditious conspiracy known as the GOP. It's no longer a political party.

Expand full comment

Or, we could say those Hallowed Halls ain't what they used to be... too many admissions based on big bucks and former family attendees. Also, while it takes some smarts to connive so well, there is a difference between intelligence and craftiness. While I often think that Trump began this era of flim-flammery, he really didn't. Think of our collective history of attraction to, and being hoodwinked by carnivals, Bible thumpers, Revival tent shows, traveling salesmen, and boss politicians. As a whole, Americans do not value critical thinking, and not every graduate of the Ivies is brilliant.

Expand full comment

Wish the rank and file understood that last sentence. A bright, smart lady says it’s just the extremists in both parties causing the problems. A Fox watcher for sure. Propaganda works with smart as well as dumb arses

Expand full comment

And the truth is quite beyond "like" and "dislike".

(I for one am not blind to the Democratic Party's Modern Times machinery or to Charlie Chaplin servicing it with a sand bucket... and so hope that people like those in this community can help make it and keep it more as it should be, a coming-together of human beings to resist the untrammeled power of money.)

Expand full comment

It’s as if you’re not a Republican they are going to teach us all what’s it’s like to be Oppressed People of every Color in America.

Expand full comment

Okay ,okay. That was worthy of the Ancient Mariner. Every word succinctly placed, resonating, convincing, “terrifying”. I am convinced that there are more levels now to the threat of Desantis.

Expand full comment

Right about Disney.

The Don’t Say Gay law is so poorly written, it will be challenged in court with a setup case suing a teacher for discussing gender by saying “boys and girls line up now” or “ask your mom and dad” or some such.

As for the block Blacks redistricting, maybe that’s what Desantis has been chatting about with Clarence Thomas. Republicans are trying hard to bring us back to the 1850s for voting lack of rights.

Even if all of it gets thrown out, the performance of Ron as powerful mobster who must be obeyed has been clear.

It’s likely the concurrent move to grab Florida’s lucrative textbook contracts for a company connected to Republican governor of Virginia Glenn Youngkin will succeed. No doubt they are donating to Desantis.

Expand full comment

Would you call it a mob?

Expand full comment

"It's no longer a political party."

Come, TC... When was it last a political party?

Expand full comment

Blatantly. Do the deed, walk away, and the memory (stench) of the deed stays with voters. A new way to rebrand your adversaries.

Expand full comment

Liars gonna lie. Cheaters gonna cheat. Grifters gonna grift. Is there no end to the corruption, bad faith and megalomania?

Expand full comment

It is possible to normalize anything but we can't accept what the Republicans are doing as normal. It is not. Flooding social media with sewage, lying, dropping all principles and civil discourse, using politics as an excuse for cult participation, using vengeance as motivation in passing laws, and whatever DeSantis is doing cannot be acceptable.

Expand full comment

We will not let hate win.

Expand full comment

We need more straight, white, Christian, suburban Moms to stand up against it!

Expand full comment

I wish Sen. Mallory McMorrow were my US Senator!

Expand full comment

White House? Chief of Staff at least :) Chief of something big, I hope.

Expand full comment

I’m a suburban mom, and it truly pains me to admit this, but the only issue I care about in the upcoming elections is whether or not any given politician is willing to speak out against the rapid medicalization of gender dysphoric or transgender self-identifying kids and teens. Once again, the dems we supported and worked for are just not listening and are going to be shocked when they tank.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, the choice is between that and criminalization of gay and trans kids and their families. There’s a thoughtful conversation to be had about medical support for trans kids. One father I know decided against it. One mom I know said it saved her child’s life. But those conversations get blocked when Republicans scream hate at the families and scream pedophile and groomer at anyone who objects to the hate.

Expand full comment

These Republican "leaders" see an issue that makes their base crazy and they whip it up. They have no interest in real conversations about peoples lives & feelings. I find it real interesting that Caitlyn, formerly Bruce Jenner is an R and apparently is running or considering running for office. As a young boy he started cross dressing at a young age and had the climate been then, what it is now, you can see where Caitlyn might have evolved much younger. That would be an interesting and informative interview today. Trans people are not a new creation of the woke left. They've been around for centuries.

Expand full comment

Thank you Joan.

Expand full comment

Go away, Russian bot.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, TC your reaction demonstrates clearly the radicalization of politics on both sides, both the Republicans and the Democrats are moving far away from the very real concerns of most of the people.

Expand full comment

Magpie, I feel your pain (I’m assuming you have a transgender child). If I may: puberty suppression medication, which is what is allowed to be prescribed for transgender children, is supposed to give kids time to grow up and become an adult before making a life-altering decision. Those who have received it have an easier time transitioning medically than those who haven’t, but that happens later, when they are adults. It is reversible.

Therapy, for parents and kids both, is really important. Find a therapist for yourself who specializes in gender issues. Learning about it helps a lot. PFLAG is a good place to start. I can recommend some books if you’re interested.

Democrats are not pushing for the medicalization of treatment for transgender kids. They are pushing for those kids to feel and be safe. Suicide rates for transgender youth are terrifying. Democrats didn’t make this happen to our kids. But a world in which Democrats are in power would be a far safer world for your kid and mine.

Expand full comment

So where do I even start responding? Most people are as poorly informed as you are, with all due respect. Suicide rates do not actually decrease for adolescents who medically transition, and there is data to suggest that there’s an increase in suicidal ideation as well as in completed suicides, probably because underlying issues were not adequately addressed prior to medicalized transition. Puberty blockage is absolutely not reversible. Other countries, notably Sweden, Finland, France, the UK, are reversing course on the so-called Dutch protocol: suspending kids in prepubertal states to give them time to decide before starting cross sex hormones. Once American kids are initiated into the gender affirmation pathway the exit ramps are few and far. There really are no supports for parents who want to slow things down for their gender questioning kids. Most therapists are not equipped or willing to do exploratory therapy for fear they will be accused of doing conversion therapy. Also, my sense from your post is that you are assuming I’m not adequately educated or informed. In fact, I am clinical psychologist who treats young adults and adolescents. My experience as a parent and as a clinician is pretty deep. And when I tell you that things are bad as regards gender questioning kids and the politics around how they should be understood and treated, I hope you can believe me just that little bit.

Expand full comment

Totally agree

Expand full comment

The "only" issue you care about is trans kids ?

Expand full comment

I wish I had the luxury of being more idealistic.

Expand full comment

It is astounding how much Republicans are obsessed with human sexual proclivities. From Gays to pedophilia they incessantly project their phobias, sickness and obsessions over sexuality. Meanwhile they refuse to take the simplest steps to avoid death or spreading it to innocents from the pandemic. Why? It is apparently driven by the same paranoid fears.

Please, just take your kid to a good Psychologist and deal with it as the personal matter it is instead of regenerating the “Satanic Panic” 2.0 to helps assholes like MTG gain office and foster Fascism.

Expand full comment

Then join the “deSantis” crowd. I always wondered what I would do if faced with such a difficult choice. I now know I would not join the cult. I wish you well. Watch Oprah’s interview with Janet Mock, Made me rethink so many things…

Expand full comment

May 3, 2015 New York Times bestselling author, MSNBC host and transgender advocate Janet Mock on gender identity and how she always knew she was a girl.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsowxKx_-_c

Expand full comment

I've never seen that interview but I read Mock's book which is very well written and very compelling. Her only sane choice was the one she made.

Expand full comment

What is “rapid medicalization”? Why is it a voting issue for you of higher priority than global warming? Far more people, including those not even conceived yet, will be affected by the climate crisis than people impacted by gender dysphoria.

Expand full comment

You missed the drama last week in re Magpie's almost 18 year old daughter who was allegedly considering taking testosterone therapy at Planned Parenthood so the whisked they daughter out of the country to get her head "straight". Of course, human and civil rights, global warming, rampant disease, voting rights, etc., are tertiary to the big pucture.

Expand full comment

Kathy, Though I am as disturbed as you by the prospect of normalizing unacceptable breaches of precedent, I also would submit, because the midterms will greatly effect which party will have captured the dynamic of the political conversation for the foreseeable future, that Dems, at the very least, must retain the House and pick up at least 2 Senate seats. In my view, setting aside the huge problem of having no minimum federal voter protection safeguards, Dems could have a real shot this fall if they could pass some piece of the party’s social and climate package as a down payment of more to come if Dems win more seats.

Expand full comment

Will Manchin let Dems do ANYTHING. He is the epitome of the DINO

Expand full comment

Jeri, In light of West Virginian protests directed, as we speak, at Manchin for blocking passage of BBB provisions, I imagine Senate leadership can persuade Manchin to sign on to a partial package. Additionally, the conventional wisdom is that Sinema would follow suit.

Expand full comment

Republicans gonna lie.

Republicans gonna cheat.

Republicans gonna grift.

Expand full comment

Liars, cheaters and grifters seek out opportunities to lie, cheat and grift. Many of the best opportunities to deploy these skills are in the political area. Nationally and at many state levels those liars, cheaters and grifter are overwhelmingly Republican. Unfortunately, in the city where I live, Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than 4.5 to 1; consequently most of the political lying, cheating and grifting here is done by Democrats. I believe the quote attributed to Harry Truman is accurate: “Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook.”

Expand full comment

Only when we demand in great numbers, that it stop.

Expand full comment

Only when they receive consequences (indictments, jail time & pay hefty fines) for their egregious behavior can we ever expect change.

Expand full comment

Americans are showing very little outrage at the scandalous behavior of our politicians being exposed on a daily basis by incredible journalists. It’s like , “not my problem” , “ who cares… they’re all crooks” , “ nothing we can do about it”. Ukrainians worry we will lose interest in their plight and they have every right to worry! My God, so many of our citizens have lost interest in our own DEMOCRACY! “Not my problem”!

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

Expand full comment

Most people have checked out. They may not be able to articulate why, but they know viscerally that the power structure left them in the dust decades ago.

Expand full comment

I think many of those who have "checked out" are exhausted. The pleading for campaign donations never end. Maybe for 2 weeks after the 2020 election but House reps are constantly asking/begging for $$. And it you do donate (and I do) every day there are dozens of emails - all with drastic headlines. It's Enough Already! Get on with the business of getting business done instead of just raising $$$. And then there are Joe Manchin and Krysten Sinema - endless drama when there should have been a LOT more accomplished. It BBB had passed and Congress was getting more done for the working middle class and the homeless, etc., we would not be constantly hearing this doom and gloom (which I find disgusting). So, we have to work even harder than we did for the 2020 election and we need to make a lot more noise about what the Biden agenda HAS accomplished and how many Republicans currently in office continue to lie - lie about their complicity in the Jan 6 attempted coup, about their cowardice in voting Trump guilty of his attempt to circumvent the Constitution, about undermining their Oath of Office, etc., etc. IF the voters decide to "check out" they need to go down on their knees for a lifetime to all the men & women who fought for this country - this democracy - for the freedoms and rights we now enjoy - and gave their lives for us. Frankly, American could (and should) take some strong lessons from the Ukrainians. They make better Americans than too many Americans these days.

Expand full comment

"Frankly, American could (and should) take some strong lessons from the Ukrainians. They make better Americans than too many Americans these days." Roger that, Rusty.

Expand full comment

They are more passionate about their democracy than Americans. So are the people of Spain. It may take Americans losing decades of exceptionalism to understand they are not exceptional.

Expand full comment

General Franco is still dead. We forget the history of fighting for democracy at our own peril.

Expand full comment

There are those here who want authoritarianism also. It's a fight ever where. My friend's parents were imprisoned by him. There are mortar shell pits in buildings. Lorca was murdered. Our home was built in 1922 by a marquis. Franco took it. In the 1980s it was purchased and rennovated for apartments. There are memorials everywhere of those who were murdered. Americans have yet to experience what Spain went through and Ukraine is going through.

Expand full comment

When I hear we Americans say we are exhausted by politics , the pandemic, etc. I guiltily blanch at the thought of Ukrainian mothers, fathers, sons and daughters and what our whining suggests to them.

Expand full comment

👌👌👌👌👌

Expand full comment

You are so right about the campaigning for $$$. I'm starting to simply delete emails with causes from my favorites. They all end up with a plea for money. Same folks over and over.

Expand full comment

Yeah, and the messages meant to induce alarm. I finally got so sick of it that I set up recurring donations where I think they'll do the most good, and now delete most of the daily, nay hourly, emails. Am I whining? Yeah, I guess so, but I give what I can and if I don't delete the emails every day I start to lose actually important mail in my inbox.

Expand full comment

Well, you can also Unsubscribe, something I'm beginning to do. Remains to be seen how much attention is paid to that though. The campaigns just buy a different list and all of a sudden I'm back on their mailings.

Expand full comment

I do go through every couple of weeks and unsubscribe, but, because I’ve set up monthly donations, every time they get a donation from me back on their list my name goes. I still keep supporting them, I just get really tired of of being deluged.

Expand full comment

Especially if the subject line is hyperbolic and has all-cap "key words" and exclamation points. Same is true if it's a "survey" about a variety of political issues.

Expand full comment

Strong Anchorage.

Expand full comment

You read my mind

Expand full comment

!!!!!

Expand full comment

We need to factor in the destabilizing impact of Covid - the disease, the confusing messages, the loss of loved ones. I think the pandemic created fertile ground for the kind of disorientation and despair that makes people vulnerable to charlatans preying on fears and offering easy fixes.

Expand full comment

Lack of focus, short attention spans, and the need for more and more drama...its a culture crisis.

Expand full comment

Escapist US TV makes me heave, never seen such brain-numbing bull Schitt. And so many love the crap. Where is our civic duty. Buried in manure piled high…

Expand full comment

Thank you, Sharon. I came here to be part of a Forum that is not bogged down in that kind of thinking only to watch it turn into one that is, and going in circles over and over. Loved this forum 2 and a half years ago. Still appreciate Dr Richardson's writings. Enjoy and learn from many of the posts from people who explore and expand on those writings, and stay because I would miss them. Bored to tears with people who simply like the sound of their own indignation. I'd love to hear their underlying philosophy and the factors behind it. That stimulates my own thinking. But there is less and less of that.

Expand full comment

I see it as well. “Woke” is not the problem

Expand full comment

Hmmm

I am not sure that messing with the Mouse that could roar if pushed is such a great idea. That mouse has the money to push back against a two-bit Governor and the state.

Since Prof. Heather is quoting Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Section 2 should be of interest to all of us. The New Republic:

"Imagine that Speaker Nancy Pelosi were to declare that several states have violated a clause largely unused and forgotten for 154 years: Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which mandates that states lose a portion of their congressional delegation if they unduly restrict the right to vote. Sorry, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, but Georgia went too far in rolling back voting rights; your state lost a seat in Congress—and it’s yours."

Its wording: "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State."

Translation: "Representatives will be figured among the States according to their numbers, counting all the people in the State, except Native Americans who are not taxed. If a State will not let any male citizen over 21 years old vote freely (unless he commits a crime, or takes part in a rebellion), the num­ber of Representatives for that states will be reduced."

There is enough going on here of which some fits denial of voting.

Expand full comment

You can bet people whom many of us are not fond of, oligarchs and corporate board members, are sizing this up and thinking, "If he will pull such crap at intimidating a major corporation as governor, what would he do if he had the power of the presidency?"

I expect to see nothing much left of DeSantis as political power in the future.

Expand full comment

But he has the power to overturn the will of the voters, same in Texas. Hedged his bets way back there

Expand full comment

I’d like to take this possibility to bed and dream about it becoming reality but I fear it would simply be a pipe dream.

Expand full comment

We have to make our faith stronger than our fears. Dream, dream big dreams!

Expand full comment

...and then talk about them. Everywhere. Loudly.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the pep talk! 👍😘

Expand full comment

I'd like to see this happen and even if it didn't work, a court case would bring more attention to the issue. I'm sure Dems throw money at less worthy things

Expand full comment

What would be the political process necessary to do this? Who votes on it?

Expand full comment

Stuart:

As I have read, Congress has the power to enforce this section if it is "purposeful" discrimination. The (my) assumption is both houses would pass a resolution. I am not sure though. What gives me pause is the enforcement of the right to equal and not separate education such as what we had seen in southern states. After the Colfax massacre came SCOTUS deciding Slaughterhouse which basically said the 14th applied to states and not individuals.

I need to ask a question of a constitutional attorney, a Dean at a university, who has helped us in the past, and I know will answer my question. An unimposing gentleman . . . It is a good question and there are court cases out there. Your question extends beyond my knowledge base. The more important question is why hasn't Congress acted given the authority to act. Can the Pres do this in lieu of Congress as Eisenhower and Johnson did?

I will ask the question and let you know either here or the next time I see you.

Expand full comment

Stuart:

This is the answer I received; "Congress clearly has the power under Section 2 of the 14th Amendment that you identify. Yet, there also is the reality that given the political realities, Congress is unlikely to act. Republican Senators surely would filibuster and block anything Democrats would try to do.

Section 3 is fascinating and it is interesting to see the attempts to invoke it, including against Greene."

Again, the filibuster issue.

Expand full comment

Can it be, glory hallelujah

Expand full comment

At the beginning of Rachel Maddow’s on Thursday, she brought up something Keven McCarthy said in 2016 when Trump was a candidate plowing through his opponents: “Putin’s paying Trump. No, I mean it, I think Putin is paying Trump.” She didn’t add to that but then went on to reveal the rest of the things McCarthy said that are recorded. And I think McConnell and McCarthy both did their rapid turnaround because Putin’s either paying them or he has something on them. Either way, it sure would be consistent.

Expand full comment

Putin was paying TFG, in condo sales and license deals through a cadre of Oligarghs and Cronys.

Expand full comment

Should Stacey Abrams campaign on making Disney a great deal to move to Atlanta?

Expand full comment

Something that is physically bigger than the city of San Francisco is not going to move anywhere. Ridiculous crap like this is, well, ridiculous crap. Take a moment and think. I hate it when this sort of thing is supposed to represent the intelligent people.

Expand full comment

I agree, TC. Anything to distract people away from the real political manipulation that desantis is focused on. Professor Richardson touched on a key fact of green space in the Reedy Creek Improvement District. The Disney DeSantis wars are all theater. Disney is going nowhere. The Reedy Creek Improvement District does contain huge green space that, unprotected, would have competing developers swarming like hungry sharks. That’s not going to happen either. Yet.

Developers, including Disney, are becoming more and more insidious in their involvement in FL politics And they have a guv that likes playing their game. Especially to stick it to anything that he deems to slap around.

Expand full comment

Morning, Christine! So, this idea that a company is indeed a person endowed with First Amendment rights is...bogus? Forgive me as I have a hard time keeping up with the latest!

Expand full comment

So Disney World will never close operations under any circumstances? And never build another park?

Expand full comment

Why should Disney flee when they can fight this and retain what they and their employees built?

The grab by the Emperor of DeSantistan is a bit like the grab of Putin for Ukraine, except the real firepower and the ability to wage a VERY long war rests on the side of the entity under attack, not with what is, in brutal honesty, a government temp worker installed by a gangster temp agency posing as a political party.

If you don't see who has the power to win this, look and see how many corporations that thrived in Germany's Third Reich remain extant and healthy today, when the Third Reich is dust. You don't need a PhD in history to teach you that corporations outlast governments. Just Google for the corporations of Hitler's Germany that are thriving now.

A corporation the size of Disney will easily outlast any delusional governor of a state--particularly a governor who came to power by a piddling thin margin of votes and now fancies himself as being a future world leader. This will not end well for him.

Expand full comment

“a government temp worker installed by a gangster temp agency posing as a political party.” ❤️😂❤️

Expand full comment

Go Tigers

Expand full comment

Oh glory, go Mickey Mouse. So true re WW2 corporations, even US ones that helped Hitler…

Expand full comment

Yes. U.S. high tech was helping dictators long before Google and Facebook.

Expand full comment

In Florida, the Ocean is the ultimate decider.

Real estate for fish.

Expand full comment

How much of Disney El be under water after the ocean rises?

Expand full comment

I believe the Florida Disney is inland.

Expand full comment

Yes, but all of Florida will be affected: where will the Miamians go?

Expand full comment

They won't MOVE one.

Expand full comment

Of course not

Expand full comment

Yeah, maybe Disney could merge with Coca-Cola…

Expand full comment

Disney moving to an emerging blue state could help make it a deeper blue and make Abrams an even stronger force.

Expand full comment

Have you seen the new movie where the Disney dolphins double down drowning Desantis ?

Expand full comment

Go Dolphins

Expand full comment

Brilliant Curt!

Expand full comment

I think the climate is the attraction for Disney, as it is for the throngs of visitors. Finding another location isn't impossible, but maybe the question is about the viability of Disney itself. At my old age, I may have lost touch with very young children, but I don't think Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck are so compelling to kids and their parents as they once were. (That's over-simplifying, I know, but I think of Disney as more studio media than theme park, now.)

Expand full comment

The Republican political establishment is a cesspool. Garbage dump of low deplorables in high office. Rampant racism, sexism, gender identity hating, money kissing, lying, cheating and stealing. We need to lose the entire party and everyone in it.

Expand full comment

Amen.

Expand full comment

And for a party that agonizes over the perceived threats to masculinity, none of them seems to mind totally debasing themselves by prostrating themselves before tfg.

Expand full comment

Because they worship masculinity. They worship the gloating overpowering of women, tfg being a known serial abuser, rapist, misogynist. They are sexist to the core.

Expand full comment

Is that your final answer, Roland? Morning!

Expand full comment

Morning! Final answer, Lynell. 😘

Expand full comment

Well, the Delta variant gave it a go. The leaders got vaccinated and threw their constituents under the bus in the red states. Those states are simply still too heavy in MAGA hats.

Expand full comment

Well said, Roland.

Expand full comment

Does Chaney hasany redeeming features besides possibly sitting the party?

Expand full comment

Liz Cheney’s redeeming feature is that she is still willing to buck the rest of the party, and Trump, by supporting democracy. She is one of the few members of that R political establishment with any courage and spine. She has some integrity left, while she is supporting white supremacy and opposing/hating LGB+ people. Her legislative voting record unfortunately makes her as distasteful as any other right-wing reactionary in politics.

Expand full comment

I too, don't really trust her, but I applaud her steadfastness. I also believe some of her "courage" comes from being backed by her iron-willed parents. They still can pull strings behind the curtains. In other words, it is not Liz all by herself being David to Goliath.

Expand full comment

Yes. Having Dick as father absolutely factors in here. A man who as VP can start a war in Iraq to benefit his company Halliburton will support his daughter if he agrees with her. Remember, Iraq was a bait-and-switch. The 9/11 attackers were mostly Saudis, Bin Laden was Saudi, and he was found in Pakistan. Iraq as a target was only relevant as blood for oil. A father like that has an amoral spine of steel.

Expand full comment

I do remember, Roland, and I am still appalled. I remember when the Republicans touted themselves as the Moral Majority, which of course they never were, but nevertheless they advocated for asymmetric warfare. We are indignant about Russia in Ukraine, but we are "blood brothers" with Russian tactics.

Expand full comment

Ron Desantis will ruin Florida’s economy because companies will not invest in a state that will not honor its tax agreements. But, he plans to not be Governor when “the chickens come home to roost”; he plans to be President by then.

Expand full comment

Already I am vomiting. Hopefully he will not be governor in the next election either. I read an account of how much this going to cost the locals. Glad not to live there, not that I would ever live in Florida. One trip to visit a relative was enough. Also watched a bit of Gangrene's testimony. It looked like the judge was holding his head in his hands in despair.

Expand full comment

Why no contempt charge,…

Expand full comment

Yes…the mostly Democratic locals.

Expand full comment

He will end up cleaning swimming pools under an assumed name when and if he emerges from prison alive.

Expand full comment

We should be so lucky.

Expand full comment

To voice it Daria, just to voice it puts it on the board. Sometimes I feel like I have to hug air.

Expand full comment

You are right about economics. It’s also what companies and investors are warning for the entire country should the unthinkable happen 2024,

Expand full comment

Why don’t we see more protesting from companies and investors about this abuse of power…punishing a business for speaking up for LGBQT citizens? Why so little outrage from the citizens of Florida?

Expand full comment

Good question. Probably a mixture of self preservation, self interest, fear, and profit security. As for the citizens of Florida, I have no idea. They should be organizing protests at every Depyscho’s press conferences.

Expand full comment

Exactly, only chump can take him out. And he may, he knows

Expand full comment

“Perjury Taylor Green” as per Marcus4Georgia Flowers 🙃

Expand full comment

I have been supporting Marcus Flowers for forever, it seems. But I received this latest fundraising email from him the other day. I quote the nonvideo portion here:

"First, Jimmy Kimmel made a harmless joke about Marjorie Taylor Greene, poking fun at her insane statement that Mitt Romney was a pedophile.

Then, Marjorie Taylor Greene reported the joke to the Capitol Police -- the same police who she attacked for defending the Congress from rioters on January 6th.

Finally, Jimmy Kimmel responded to Marjorie Taylor Greene by calling her a 'snow-ciopath' (a snowflake and a sociopath), and reporting her to Batman."

But here's what he said that grabbed me:

"Look, this whole thing would be hilarious if it weren’t so pathetic and embarrassing to our district, state, and country.

This silliness needs to stop.

The people of northwest Georgia -- and America for that matter -- deserve so much better than this type of representation from Marjorie Taylor Greene."

Hear! Hear! Marcus Flowers!

Expand full comment

Yes, I support him from VA!

Expand full comment

"Opponents of the law are suing." The case appears to be the well pled, 'Black Voters, League of Women Voters et al. vs. Florida Secretary of State, et al. Case #148201925, Circuit Court of the 2nd Judicial District. Tallahassee FL. Update: The League of Women Voters of Florida (LWVFL ) Homepage details the goals of non-partisan "Fair Districts" & what that means in Florida. LWVFL Savy procedurally too.

Expand full comment

Yay !

Expand full comment

Thank you Professor, for today’s letter. Knowing you’re a historian, your perspective gives us an edge on understanding the news. And MTG’s day in court, connected to 1861. But the repub code word is 1776! After watching her under oath today, (hours and hours I was glued to the screen) believing (wrong!!!) I would learn something new about the insurrection and her role, I did learn one thing. She has the same coach as every other repub under oath and it’s to remember these answers: “I don’t remember”, “I don’t recall” or look kind of puzzled. Repubs with memory issues, no worries for you.

Expand full comment

The technique was demonstrated by President Reagan who managed to utter: "I don't recall" ninety-six (96) times at one (1) deposition as I do recall.

Expand full comment

Well, in his case, he did end up having Alzheimer’s. Remember when he’d fall asleep? But, of course, you are right.

Expand full comment

But he was evil before that…

Expand full comment

Well, yeah, that too….

Expand full comment

Reagan certainly set the stage for the modern Republican Party. He also was the typical nominee: Not having all his wits about him just like GWB, Trump et all. Just put a popular white guy up for the office and the party will continue to manipulate behind the scenes and put big bucks into their pockets.

Expand full comment

But if the President makes a little slip, that's another story.

Expand full comment

Of course, this playbook is red.

Expand full comment

Someone with more time and talent--maybe Randy Rainbow??--needs to take this start and run with it:

Trump went down to Georgia,

he was lookin' for a votes to steal-

he was in a bind 'cos he was way behind

and he was willin' to make a deal

He came across a woman

Sittin' on a stump and thinkin' she's hot

Trump jumped up on a hickory stump and said

"Marge, let me tell you what"

All apologies to Charlie Daniels and Band.

Expand full comment

Love Charlie & Band -- no apology needed.

Expand full comment

You done fine, Miselle...I was singing right along!

Expand full comment

My memory bank was empty yesterday as I -- thankfully! -- forgot all about MTG's court day. Thanks for listening for us, Irenie!

Expand full comment

Lucky you, Lynell!

Expand full comment

Lynell, I think your mind was looking out for you. I watched and now need detox.

Expand full comment

At least it was finished by early afternoon, California time. In today’s techno world, we don’t miss much, as it just plays forever, which is one benefit the “bad guys” forget.

Expand full comment

"I don't recall." "I don't remember."

"Truthfulness has never been counted among the political virtues, and lies have always been regarded as justifiable tools in political dealings. Whoever reflects on these matters can only be surprised by how little attention has been paid, in our tradition of philosophical and political thought, to their significance, on the one hand for the nature of action and, on the other, for the nature of our ability to deny in thought and word whatever happens to be the case. This active, aggressive capability is clearly different from our passive susceptibility to falling prey to error, illusion, the distortions of memory, and to whatever else can be blamed on the failings of our sensual and mental apparatus." Hannah Arendt

Expand full comment

Rowshan,

"I don't remember"

"I don't recall"

Is all that Oliver North said under oath during the investigation Reagan's illegal sale of weapons to Iran (during the Iraq/Iran war) and transfer to a bloodthirsty dictator in Latin America someplace.

It totally worked. Nobody went to jail. North became a rich hero.

Expand full comment

Yes, Mike. Sad, but true. Substack is not allowing me to ❤️ your statement.

Expand full comment

That's a common issue, Rowshan. Just go to the little circular arrow on your computer's address line and tap it to refresh your page. Then, you can "heart" again.

Expand full comment

Of course!! Thank you, Hope. Silly me!

Expand full comment

These hard core Trumpist/Tea Party patterns come to mind:

- “own the libs” (allows unlimited corruption to make libs cry)

- “I want government to be so small you can drown it in the bathtub”

- the “stable genius” has a plan that we don’t yet see - but Q will tell us

- “the enemy of my enemy is my friend = Putin, who is also 45’s benefactor

- whataboutism = if you think this is bad, Dems support aborting and trafficking children

- “it’s fake news”

- the authoritarian follower has beliefs that are adhered to so that contradictions are not seen or are ignored (Altemeyer, B, 2006)

- to keep those beliefs in place, own their media and repeat your lies often; also inoculate them against blaming you by blaming the other side first

- admitting to any of this throws the GOP out of power, and we can’t do that because Dems are the source of all evil

- dominate or be dominated, which means if we don’t rig elections they will

- liberty, always

To prevail we need to mobilize everyone who isn’t caught up in that whirlwind to vote and organize and use every legal option.

Expand full comment

You have nailed the propaganda perfectly, has been a winning strategy for much of this century. Takes military might to knock it down, then it resurrects faster than Jesus

Expand full comment

I have been thinking more about this and see some additional ways forward. We can target messaging to moral stances that matter to conservatives. In one of my previous comments, on April 11, I wrote:

"Currently I'm reading everything I can to understand this better, including, recently, Jonathan Haidt's The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, where he shows that Democrats appeal to two fundamental moral foundations, Care/harm and Fairness/cheating, while conservatives appeal to the full complement of six, which adds Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, Sanctity/degradation and Liberty/oppression. Democratic messaging -- not governance -- doesn't address the last four. What if we forcefully appealed to these also?"

We can appeal to conservatives about Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion and the Liberty/oppression dimensions for instance. Their politicians are subverting lawful authority and liberty by corrupting elections. This is a great betrayal of what America has stood for.

We can use the tools given in Words That Win, where we learn to not echo their messaging but find common values and call out villainy where it lies.

https://www.wordsthatwin.org/

For our own moral sustenance, we can read Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, and others take courage from the brave freedom fighters around the world who refuse to accept authoritarian rule. We are fortunate that we can push back against the January 6 insurrectionists by pursuing the rule of law and reminding Republicans that this is what they say they stand for. But we have to find a way to give conservatives a seat at the table rather than face the utter collapse of what they have to offer for good governance.

Expand full comment

Also, in reading Altemeyer, he writes that children of fundamentalists, many of whom score high in the Right Wing Authoritarian scale more often than not leave the fold. Some of this will take time.

Expand full comment

These are memes that the definition of a cult I posted (scroll above) can be easily be remedied with truth and then shot back on their propaganda machines (faux, oan, dullbart and all the other mindcontrol machines out there). Please take some time each week to provide a few "intelligent shots" from our bow on their sites. The more the merrier. When you travel to those foreign shores and find a few sane souls there, it is so exciting and good to give them positive feedback for what they are doing! It is quite exciting for about 10 minutes...until I start to feel my stomach turn I know it is time to then jump out of that demonpile and cleanse myself with a doggie video of Sawol on Youtube. She is a living example of spirit manifested as pure joy and happiness and refreshment for Warriors of Democracy. Total purification for Soldiers of Light to dissolve the the sticky crud after a visit to the dark-cult caves.

Expand full comment

Republicans could line up small children, shoot them, have it be broadcast on the Fox channel,

and keep their jobs while getting Trump re-elected. We live in a sad, scary country that will get worse and worse - for decades. There's no voting ourselves out of this.

Expand full comment

No ‘could’ about it - that’s exactly what they are doing with their frantic attacks on trans children and their families. Then they scream groomer at anyone who opposes the hate. Hurray for Mallory Mcmorrow and everyone else who stands up to the hate.

Expand full comment

Joan,

The "attacks" on "trans children" have broad appeal to lots of folks who are not extreme or bigoted.

For example, I question the wisdom of allowing someone under 18 to undergo irreversible surgery during a time in their life when big changes are occurring that are sometimes scary and weird.

I remember my own sister, 18 months younger than me, when over what seemed to be a couple of weeks, she developed what I, her own brother, thought were eye popping breasts (compared to what they were the month before or so).

She cried and was upset and spent a lot of time with my mom talking about stuff that I did not want to hear, BUT, we lived in a tiny, pine farm house. I used to go outside mostly to avoid listening, even in the middle of the night if she started crying.

WHAT IF: My sister, during all this confusion and angst, had decided she wanted to be a guy? Get those ugly things called breasts cut off?? And, what if my Mom would have said: SURE, whack 'em off and be done with it?

Then what?

I think concerns about under 18 surgeries permanently altering confused young people is a reasonable concern Joan, based on my own experiences with my sister.

btw: She has two beautiful, funny, smart adult children and and has had a few husbands now.

She is totally comfortable being a woman because she says men are just too dumb to bother with.

Expand full comment

There are no legitimate physicians who treat children with gender identity issues or questions who would act that rashly or quickly. I listened to two of them the other day who spoke about how they carefully and compassionately work with kids over a period of years to help them decide who and what they want to be. In your sister's case they could have used temporary hormone blockers (they are described as perfectly reversible pause buttons) to slow the breast growing process down. Today with proper treatment, kids will be helped - if parents embrace the latest medical and psychological help available.

However, I don't disagree with your last sentence. :) I am ready for Mallory McMorrow to run the country and my wife could be an excellent adviser - after all, my honey is always right.

Expand full comment

Agree and thank you ( like button not working)

Expand full comment

Mike, The issue is not teens rushing into surgery. Even adults have to live as their other gender for a full year before surgery is available to them. When children come out to their parents as trans, and the parents choose to be supportive (as distinct from beating the kids and throwing them out, which happens a lot), the parents and kids need help figuring out what to do. They do not need bullying politicians using them to drum up panic. In Texas, child services were instructed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott to investigate all families with trans kids for abuse, and forbidden to conclude that the children were well cared for. This both harassed the kids’ families and took staff away from investigation of real child abuse.

As I’ve said elsewhere today, there are difficult questions that warrant discussion. Whether to hate and criminalize people who are different is not one of them. We have to stand up to the politicians’ hate machine and not confuse it with respectful discussion of real issues.

Expand full comment

Joan,

I completely agree with all your wll written thinking above. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Pretty much.

Expand full comment

And chump is the most vile example of the worst of humanity. Doesn’t say much for the half of us that worships him.

Expand full comment