95 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
David Sea's avatar

America would benefit greatly from a repeal of Trump’s tax cuts. We'll need to elect more than 59 Dem Senators in Nov.

Also, if we have as little as a ONE Representative deficit in the House, MAGA will run all of Congress again, (even if Trump’s in the slammer.)

Expand full comment
John D. Cooper's avatar

David, we have seen the Republican numbers in the House decline even as they hold a slim majority. We can and should take back the House. While the Senate is a challenge it is doable with citizens paying attention to the most unproductive legislative years on record. Concurrently, the courts and the Republican state houses are attempting to prevail with a scorched earth policy agenda that helps no one, fosters chaos, ignores the will of the people and leaves communities to face violence with both rhetoric and easy access to military weapons by people who are a danger to our communities.

These are reasons we can and must win in 2024. The future of all citizens will be shaped by the decisions made in the months ahead. Let’s march forward and make history in 2024 and 2025.

Expand full comment
David Sea's avatar

It'll be specially helpful if Republicans continue to show voters their true colors.

Next they'll be writing Acts to benefit home appliances.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

My home appliances really appreciate the House effort. Fortunately, they have decided to continue working too.

Expand full comment
Lynn Spann Bowditch's avatar

Yup. Our house of representatives working again and even more openly fbo the electricity/fossil fuel interests and Chinese and other non-American manufacturers. Do they really think we are this stupid?

Expand full comment
Debbie's avatar

Yes, they do really think we are that stupid and sadly, it appears those who voted for these house members are that stupid.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

It looks like Greene has a big following from the poorer section of GA.

Expand full comment
Susan Denning's avatar

They don't know or care if we are that stupid. Given their gerrymandered districts and (often) lack of opponents they need not give us another thought. MAGA Mike has never run in a contested race and he is third in line for the US Presidency. He and the others are no different than "southern white elites" of the 1860's discussed in this letter.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

They live in their own reeking bubble. We just bought a new dryer, made here in the USA.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

Maybe Congress should take a lesson from them.

Expand full comment
Jen Andrews's avatar

Maybe they'll be too busy passing aid to Israel, which provoked an Iranian attack. An attack using the same drones Russia has been using on Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Russia and Trump will be sorry if the House actually manages to pass aid to Ukraine and keeps Israel from being a distraction to what it is trying to do to Ukraine. May Johnson see the light after his trip to Mal-a-Lago.

Expand full comment
SLWeston (PA)'s avatar

“Mal-a-Lago” — nice, Virginia: Subtle but effective.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I call it Tsar-a-Loco.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

It seems that Mar a Lago has quite the busy social calendar featuring Orban. Too bad Putin couldn't visit but he has a bounty on his head if he basically leaves his country.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Appropriately a bounty on his head. Unfortunately there is no bounty on his bots.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

LOL.. Aren't they now? Those are right up there with renaming an airport after trump. I hope that idea crashes and burns. I've been getting weekly updates from one of the CT Congresswomen, Johanna Hayes. She lists all the money she was able to get for her district which was needed. She also told about some legislation she has presented. No appliances, no renaming airports.

Expand full comment
Eric Kruse's avatar

"While the Senate is a challenge it is doable with citizens paying attention to the most unproductive legislative years on record."

The question being whether the citizens are actually paying attention or not. Hopefully, they will wake up soon.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

It ain't government of the people, by the people, for the people if people ain't payin' attention.

Expand full comment
T_Allen's avatar

I think we are....more than Republicans think we are.

Expand full comment
Jen Andrews's avatar

Yesterday my state held their Democratic convention . The numbers seem to show 82%! of the delegates were there.

Last week the Republicans held theirs, and had less than 50% show.

I think there might be hope.

Expand full comment
Linda McCaughey's avatar

One of my enduring favorites: "The world is run by those who show up"!

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

". . . those who show up *and don't go home*." Unfortunately, most of us have jobs and other responsibilities, so this leaves too much up to the lobbyists, who get paid to show up and stay put.

In my state -- supposedly blue Massachusetts -- the legislature doesn't have its own research bureau, so guess who does a lot of the "research"? Got it in one: lobbyists.

Expand full comment
Linda McCaughey's avatar

If we don't do it, there's always someone with an agenda who will.

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

Right, but my point is that those who are getting paid have more staying power than those who have livings to make and other obligations to fulfill.

Expand full comment
Linda McCaughey's avatar

I have known a number of lobbyists. Other than your very important point regarding "it's how they make a living; we do other jobs", they have the same problems and obligations as the rest of us do.

Expand full comment
T_Allen's avatar

I wonder if the R's who show up are the ones most afraid of what awaits.?

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

Unfortunately, it would take trump winning and screwing around with social security, MAGA wanting to retire at 66 1/2 (right?) and then told he has to wait until 70 to get his full benefits. Conversation: What? I thought social security kicked in at 66 1/2? Sorry, trump signed off on the extension. He said he would and he did. Happy working on your construction job for another few years.

Expand full comment
T_Allen's avatar

The other problem that arises from extension of time for workers is that the jobs they create when they retire aren't available and all those people new to the work force can't find one. It really backs everything up and creates more financial hardship among the young.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

This is where the government subsidies can come in by giving people whose jobs are obsolete (coal) better skills. People are concerned about the advent of electric cars. Train the existing people how to do this.

College isn't for everyone. Train the ones without high school diplomas or just a high school diploma a skill. You don't need to read Shakespeare to fix an electrical system or repair a car.

In the long run this will (hopefully) reduce unemployment and welfare costs. Hey, republicans! Some times you need to spend a little money to save even more.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

Maybe trump will be arrogant and tell his people they don't have to vote because he is winning. He certainly waasn't very welcoming to Haley's supporters.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

To expand the base, register more Democrats. Register Democrats to save Democracy.

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Writing 25 postcards to voters per day—more if there’s not too much to write. Current batch to MI can do 25 in three hours.

Expand full comment
Susan Denning's avatar

Working on a batch of postcards for Wisconsin citizens right now.

Expand full comment
Craig Moore's avatar

I agree. Many of us are, but not enough and too many are getting their news(?) from the likes of Fox and the Rush's clones. I've been listening to Sara Longwell's reports based on interviews with voters from all over the country. The trumpian conservatives are incredibly misinformed and inarticulate. I hope they are more intelligent than they sound because all of them were likely voters.

On the other hand, the liberals were well informed, even though many hold very different opinions from mine. Those who might not vote for Biden are angry, but they articulate their anger well. I hope they are intelligent enough to vote for Joe even if they don't like it.

I don't mean to look down on trump supporters because I understand their anger too. If we can get them to listen to facts instead of culture war nonsense, they might just come around. And one of the things they need to both hear and feel in their lives is that Reganomics is why the system WAS rigged against them and Biden's new approach is working for them and will continue to if we give he and Harris another term.

In a conversation with Robert Rich on Saturday, Journalist Michael Pollen said that if Biden wins another 4 years, he will take the gloves off in fighting corporations who are pillaging America. I believe that.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

All trumpers see is the high price of groceries and gas. I, myself, am a bit dismayed at the grocery prices BUT from what I have read, the lower wage earners have increased their salaries to accommodate inflation. The thing is if you increase salaries, prices increase, too.

Expand full comment
T_Allen's avatar

Just because people don't make a lot of noise doesn't mean they aren't listening. In a classroom there are always the noisy ones....maybe If the teacher is lucky 30%. The rest are either asleep at the wheel or just listening. Sometimes hard to tell the difference. But when test time comes teachers are sometimes surprised at how many actually got it. Sometimes disappointed, sometimes truly amazed. I think this year, like 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2022 we'll be truly amazed.

Expand full comment
Eric Kruse's avatar

I really hope you're right.

Expand full comment
Lynn O’Neal's avatar

And therein lies the challenge. They aren’t. Too many people, whose very lives are at risk because of these power hungry, my way is right and righteous, callous, uncaring, ignorant, can’t think of what they are to be called, have bamboozled them totally. And many are people who are not stupid, who are aware mostly of what’s going on. I keep saying there will be huge numbers of psychological studies about this phenomena.

The best thing I saw was a comment the other day from someone who pointed to the hundreds of thousands of people who drove and flew and rented hotel rooms, etc. to watch the eclipse, a scientific event, predicted long ago, but many were the same who refused to believe in vaccines or think the earth is flat!

Selective ignorance?

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

More like willful ignorance, I think.

Expand full comment
Marsie (E. Texas)'s avatar

My husband drove one hour to get into the zone of totality. He stopped at a gas station to ask where the town park was and mentioned the eclipse. The attendant's response: "What eclipse?" This was 30 minutes before totality! I'm not convinced that folks ARE aware of the world around them...

Expand full comment
David Holzman's avatar

A lot certainly aren't. But a lot are. (I don't know how the numbers break down at any particular time or place.)

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Many of my family live in the area of total eclipse. i had to set one of them straight after she posted a conspiracy theory. She did thank me for my post, so at least she read it. Southern Indiana and Illinois....hotbeds of ignorance and regressive nonsense. And based on their lives, I would say a lot of people are busy trying to make ends meet, having health problems, arguing with each other, having children they shouldn't have, etc.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

and they think health insurance is bad now...

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

How about people who spend a lot of money going to trump rallies. I am sure they are not free. Add admission, gas (flights, maybe not so much), hotel rooms (what I saw were trumpers staying in tents supposedly used for summer camping or cars). Just saying. BTW it was snowing

FYI when I was in NH for Pete's rally, I stayed in a bed and breakfast, home breakfast including fresh baked muffins, private bathroom. When I got to my room, a fire was going in the electric fire place.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

If we're going to do this, which I agree we must, the Democrats will have to develop and execute a strategy to counter REDMAP and treat all 50 states as battlegrounds. There is at least a reasonable chance to grab a Senate seat in MO and boot Hawley if Lucas Kunce can gat some support from the national party apparatus and donors. This is probably true in other races as well, but the constant harping on the 7 focus states detracts from a bigger message.

Expand full comment
Ed (Iowa)'s avatar

Even Iowa is flippable. Just gotta work at it (only the representatives are on the ballot this year).

Expand full comment
Sandra VO (Maryland)'s avatar

We have a different situation here in blue MD., Ed. The popular anti Trump Republican Larry Hogan will be running in the General election against one of 2 (of the 5) popular Primary Election candidates (Trone and Alsobrooks) for Senator Ben Cardin's Senate seat. We NEED that Senate seat to be Democratic!

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

representatives are good. Maybe the House could get something done with fewer republicans.

Expand full comment
David Holzman's avatar

I'm going to be donating to Lucas Kunce. He's got a good chance.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

I have already as well as Fraische?

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

John D. that Comment was an excellent strategy summary throughout the end of this year & putting a final end to sinister Supply Side 'economics' of 1981-2021.

The House is back in Session on Monday 4/15 & the danger of a wider regional war in the Middle East's a distinct possibility. $95 Billion in financial & humanitarian aid to Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan has already passed the Senate 70-29 waiting for a House Vote.

There a number of House ways to get the bill on Biden's desk ready for the President's signature next Tuesday. Steam roll the seditious Speaker's ultra thin 'majority'. Yes, I am calling my Contra Costa County CA Office today & Nancy Pelosi (Emeritus) today to help get it done.

Bring the "Senate Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan Package" to the House Floor for a vote now.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

The Iranian attack may be the impetus to get the House to do what they should have done months ago.

Expand full comment
SPW's avatar

I would highly recommend keeping up with all the court challenges by subscribing to Marc Elias’s DEMOCRACY DOCKET on You Tube too. He and his firm have successfully challenged many of the draconian laws that have been passed in the various states.

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

Thank you SPW ;I will chec out "Elias Law Group, LLC" & 'Democracy Docket". Also, Attorney Marc can be found @marcelias/X.

Sunday Afternoon Update: Here is Elias Law Group, LLC's Mission Statement:

ELG, LLC is "a mission driven firm committed to helping Democrats win. [Citizens to ] Vote & Progressives make change."

Expand full comment
John D. Cooper's avatar

Thank you. I assume Democracy Docket takes a little different approach than our Joyce Vance, a former DoJ lawyer and scholar. (?)

Expand full comment
John D. Cooper's avatar

So many people responded to this that it seemed only right to steal a link from Jessica Craven’s Extra, Extra! This is an uplifting story from David Pepper about people energized and running for office. Be inspired. Do the same.

https://open.substack.com/pub/davidpepper/p/report-from-the-front-lines-missouri-17c?r=39h2h&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
Lavinia Baker's avatar

My worry is that I’ve watched Mr Trump con wealthy educated people (yes, some simply greedy) here in Palm Beach and wealthy areas.

How difficult would it be for him to con those living paycheck to paycheck (the majority of the country)?

I’m afraid that he doesn’t need former true Republicans any more at this point; just a populist message.

Expand full comment
John D. Cooper's avatar

Lavinia, you may be right but we must become active participants in the country’s democracy and give it our best. There are many reasons to be optimistic, most of is the groundswell of engaged citizens like us giving their time and $$$.

Expand full comment
Barbara Jo Krieger's avatar

David, We neither need to nor could we, in the foreseeable future, elect 59+ Democratic Senators to repeal the Trump tax cuts. Currently, there are 49 Senators (excluding both Manchin & Sinema) who support filibuster reforms that would override the 60-vote threshold required for legislation to move to the floor for debate and an up or down majority vote, with the VP, if needed, casting the tie-breaking vote. Accordingly, to achieve meaningful change, we must hold our 49 Senate seats, flip 1 Republican-held seat, retake the House and hold the White House. Only then, in my view, will Reagan-era policy increasingly recede.

Expand full comment
Penny Scribner's avatar

Thoughtful, accurate, I believe, answer. And that is what I hope happens.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

Hoping to flip Florida and even Texas.

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

The factual presentations seem little compared to the incessant clamor , and doubly it’s not listened to by ‘their base’.

What I see happening here/there steady Democratic wins, steady forward progress in job growth, infrastructure projects implemented and a slowly growing awareness of number losses for Republican support/resignation/donating/abortion stand.

Could it be the ruse is up?

Nonetheless , our own push must stay the course , there is much to UNDO regards to the tax structures since Regan , plenty of area for improvement in our safeguards/laws -Citizens Untied, Filibuster,Voting and Women’s Rights,and in totality Health Care specifically Big Pharma’s influence. Corporate America needs reigned in!

💙💙VOTE ALL THE COMPLICIT OUT💙💙

Expand full comment
Jack A. Roe's avatar

Did they have 59 republicans senators when the Trump tax cuts were passed? I think that 59 vote rule should be discarded. It is antiquated.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

All we need for that is 52 D Senators - since we won't have Manchinema to kick in their asses any more, and on January 3 2025 we can be rid of a filibuster with the Senate Majority Leader changing the rules and leaving it out.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

I dream, but will Manchinema find some other way to help repubs.

Expand full comment
TCinLA's avatar

They're out of office as of election day in November

Expand full comment
Marj's avatar

When will the dynamic duo be gone Jeri?

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

I thought that they would stay til their terms end.

Expand full comment
Barbara Jo Krieger's avatar

Jack, The Republican-controlled Senate was able to pass the Trump tax cuts with 51 votes through budget reconciliation, which only requires a simple majority.

Expand full comment
T_Allen's avatar

Which is what it takes to change Senate Rules.

Expand full comment
Sandra VO (Maryland)'s avatar

"Budget reconciliation is a special parliamentary procedure of the United States Congress set up to expedite the passage of certain federal budget legislation in the Senate." Wikipedia

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Like a few other "rules".

Expand full comment
Stanley Goodman's avatar

Jack, the filibuster rule works for us when we’re in the minority and against is when we’re in a less-than-2/3 majority. It protects us from the majority party being totally dominant. Sooner or later, maybe even next year, Dems will be in the minority, and Reps will want to eliminate the rule. Now, I hate the filibuster rule, but if Reps take the senate, I’ll love it.

Expand full comment
Jack A. Roe's avatar

It does provide some stability which is good, but it also can cause a chronic stagnation, with nothing getting done. I doubt that Joe Biden wants the 59 vote rule eliminated but I feel it might be good to be rid of it. I have mixed feelings about it, but I do think we have too many ways built into the system that protects the minority and lately those protections have been abused.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

The 60 vote rule can stay so long as we elect a total of at least 60 senators -- a tall task, given gerrymandering. Removal of it can always be used as a threat...

Expand full comment
Stanley Goodman's avatar

Yes, IF we can get money out of politics, eliminate extreme gerrymandering, and find a proper line between freedom of speech and extreme propaganda (“active measures”).

Expand full comment
George's avatar

Yes. The Democrats need a solid majority in both houses and the presidency. If that happens then the crazies will have an extremely weak “rigged election” argument. More importantly with such a majority there is an opportunity to pass legislation that benefits the majority of citizens and not just the top tier. In addition it could be an opportunity to modernize our government. First call for a constitutional convention and second overhaul the arcane “rules” in both the House and the Senate to achieve a truly democratic and representative government. If this happens and if the democratic majority can deliver meaningful legislation that is well executed, then President Biden could become another FDR at a time when we really need that type of leadership.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

I’ve been waiting for this column for years! It’s here and the responses are a joy to read. I lived the years since Reagan got rid of Carter and tore his solar panels off the White House, taxed the middle class (can anyone here who didn’t live the Reagan years remember when credit card interest was tax deductible ?), and discredited the poor while doing Iran Contra?

Expand full comment
Lynn Spann Bowditch's avatar

Reagan was a swine, aided and abetted by the loathsome individuals "advising" him. Leonard Leo, the reactionary members of SCOTUS, the Federalist Society, etc., and all their works and policies, are the noxious outgrowths thereof.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

What can we do with Leonard Leo who is a threat to US all.

Expand full comment
Lynn Spann Bowditch's avatar

I would almost certainly be banned if I say what I want, but I keep saying to myself the famous/infamous words of Henry II re: Thomas Becket.

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

Yes...those arcane rules need to be overhauled....especially because they allow one person to hold complete power over our legislative process. The electoral college needs to be eliminated.

Also, the Supreme Court needs to be fixed, and the DOJ needs to stop pussy footing around. Did Garland think the American public would be satisfied with only the prosecution of J6ers?

Expand full comment
Lynn Spann Bowditch's avatar

The first order of such a Constitutional Convention must be to enact the Equal Rights Amendment, ratified by all the states needed over a decade ago. The second must be to propose an Amendment declaring that Americans have a right to privacy in their personal affairs, including reproductive matters, more artfully stated than that, so as to preserve the right to make all abortion decisions those exclusively of the pregnant person.

Expand full comment
Terry Nicholetti's avatar

We have to tell this story wherever we can. Here's my Twitter X post (exactly 239 characters) I'm posting it wherever I see a GOP misinformation tweet about their benefits or Biden's shortcomings re the economy or Trump's support of "everyday Americans."

_________________________________

Here's a different view from UAW President Shawn Fain..."Workers have realized they’ve been getting screwed for decades, & they’re fed up."

How?

Historian Heather Cox Richardson @HC_Richardson tells the story in this edition, 1981-today. Check it out!

https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/april-13-2024?r=eznl2&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Dana Bennett's avatar

It FEELS PRETTY HOPELESS. Gawd, I HATE TRUMP. And Mike MAGA Johnson!

Expand full comment
Vincent Schumacher's avatar

Dana:

What's hopeless about it? I just re-read Prof Richardson's letter. It sounds pretty optimistic to me. She is essentially writing the obituary for the modern Republican -- Re-Qonfederate Party.

Not that those of us who are hoping to preserve a liberal representative government that actually works for the citizens can afford to sit on our hands. I'll continue to work here in West Michigan with the local Democratic Party to increase voter awareness and loyalty to democratic principles . . . e.g. expanded voter access to the polls.

You've heard it before, I'm sure: Democracy is not a spectator sport.

\Vince S

Expand full comment
Old Man's avatar

Not necessarily. The Dems need 51, Biden needs to accept that bipartisanship is dead and Schumer must kill the filibuster with 51 votes.

Expand full comment
Patricia  A  Martinez's avatar

Yes, that is definitely true!

Expand full comment