I'm not sure what to make of that. You make a lot of strong charges/assertions/conclusions without backup. You give the impression of being a rabid McCarthyist; I hope I'm wrong.
Regarding Ukrainian bio-labs, I'm going to search a bit and see what the "other side" has to say, and (hopefully) come back and add a link so we can compare it…
I'm not sure what to make of that. You make a lot of strong charges/assertions/conclusions without backup. You give the impression of being a rabid McCarthyist; I hope I'm wrong.
Regarding Ukrainian bio-labs, I'm going to search a bit and see what the "other side" has to say, and (hopefully) come back and add a link so we can compare it to what Tulsi says.
EDIT: Here is an article from Sputnik News (owned by the Russian government) from March 31, retailing what the Russian Minister of Defense said, naming the names of alleged Americans involved in Ukrainian bio-weapons research:
John - I asked you to substantiate the view that reinstating Glass Steagall would address 21st century banking abuses.
And I agree that better, deeper and broader regulation would be appropriate. I think Gabbard's promotion of reinstating Glass-Steagall is at best sentimental, at worst poorly informed, and in any event probably not much of an answer to contemporary banking issues.
If you want to find out why liquidity has become the compass point for FDIC insurance, as opposed to specifically-directed asset portfolios set by law, here's a helpful piece of information from the FDIC.
I'm not sure what to make of that. You make a lot of strong charges/assertions/conclusions without backup. You give the impression of being a rabid McCarthyist; I hope I'm wrong.
Regarding Ukrainian bio-labs, I'm going to search a bit and see what the "other side" has to say, and (hopefully) come back and add a link so we can compare it to what Tulsi says.
EDIT: Here is an article from Sputnik News (owned by the Russian government) from March 31, retailing what the Russian Minister of Defense said, naming the names of alleged Americans involved in Ukrainian bio-weapons research:
https://sputniknews.com/20220331/who-are-the-americans-coordinating-bioweapons-research-in-ukraine-labs-1094370470.html
I haven't read this; I barely skimmed it, but I'll get back to it later.
But my earlier question seems worth repeating:
Whose fake news do you believe?
And not Tulsi Gabbard's, either.
Here's some reasonably diverse journalism on the topic, all debunking the "bio-weapons labs" assertions of the Russian Army's agitprop section..
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114272
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/mar/18/ukrainian-bioweapons-labs-qanon-fox-news
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/exclusive-who-says-it-advised-ukraine-destroy-pathogens-health-labs-prevent-2022-03-11/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/11/how-right-embraced-russian-disinformation-about-us-bioweapons-labs-ukraine/
You make a wild frothing reference to "the Russian Army's agitprop section," sort of like that famous wizard saying, "Don't look behind that curtain!"
Yup, he's just like Professor Oz. Pulling levers and pushing buttons of illusion.
It's not really frothy enough.
Your right, sort of like stale beer
John - I asked you to substantiate the view that reinstating Glass Steagall would address 21st century banking abuses.
And I agree that better, deeper and broader regulation would be appropriate. I think Gabbard's promotion of reinstating Glass-Steagall is at best sentimental, at worst poorly informed, and in any event probably not much of an answer to contemporary banking issues.
If you want to find out why liquidity has become the compass point for FDIC insurance, as opposed to specifically-directed asset portfolios set by law, here's a helpful piece of information from the FDIC.
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/safety/manual/section6-1.pdf