Can anyone unearth an image or evidence of DT placing any other being on a pedestal above him? Cohn was his mentor, not his master.
Here, however, fealty was sold to him as the ultimate opportunity. Putin could not have dreamed up a tool better suited to his purpose. Yet, given the forces in play, the sorceror'…
Can anyone unearth an image or evidence of DT placing any other being on a pedestal above him? Cohn was his mentor, not his master.
Here, however, fealty was sold to him as the ultimate opportunity. Putin could not have dreamed up a tool better suited to his purpose. Yet, given the forces in play, the sorceror's apprentice may prove even more dangerous than the sorceror.
That said, can anyone explain how it can be licit for the Speaker and Representatives openly to take orders from a private individual that directly sabotage the national commitment to provide material support to an imperilled ally?
Perhaps some jurist can explain this deep mystery to us.
Likewise, any official or politician with even the vaguest experience of national security issues and the tight rules governing highly classified documents will know that any other individual who had played fast and loose with the merest fragment of the papers purloined by DT would have been buried alive in a maximum security hole in the ground long since.
It seems the man has succeeded in "normalizing" the ultimate crimes.
All I can think of as recourse is that each of the folks on this substack should send Trump fifty coupons for a double cheeseburger with bacon. Cholesterol might take care of the problem?
Not just your belief, Marge.
Can anyone unearth an image or evidence of DT placing any other being on a pedestal above him? Cohn was his mentor, not his master.
Here, however, fealty was sold to him as the ultimate opportunity. Putin could not have dreamed up a tool better suited to his purpose. Yet, given the forces in play, the sorceror's apprentice may prove even more dangerous than the sorceror.
That said, can anyone explain how it can be licit for the Speaker and Representatives openly to take orders from a private individual that directly sabotage the national commitment to provide material support to an imperilled ally?
Perhaps some jurist can explain this deep mystery to us.
Likewise, any official or politician with even the vaguest experience of national security issues and the tight rules governing highly classified documents will know that any other individual who had played fast and loose with the merest fragment of the papers purloined by DT would have been buried alive in a maximum security hole in the ground long since.
It seems the man has succeeded in "normalizing" the ultimate crimes.
What recourse remains?
All I can think of as recourse is that each of the folks on this substack should send Trump fifty coupons for a double cheeseburger with bacon. Cholesterol might take care of the problem?