Yes! Of course it is speculative about human prehistory, but why not? The authors have some good insights. It gives pause to the thinking that males, because of superior muscle strength, must have been the movers and shakers of society. (My brief rephrasing)
Yes! Of course it is speculative about human prehistory, but why not? The authors have some good insights. It gives pause to the thinking that males, because of superior muscle strength, must have been the movers and shakers of society. (My brief rephrasing)
Yes, but based on more recent archeological finds. It was also a nice review of what theories have existed in the past. I liked the emphasis on non-European societies. I am not quite finished and then more rethinking on my part. I did like that they gave women much more credit than they usually are given.
Yes! Of course it is speculative about human prehistory, but why not? The authors have some good insights. It gives pause to the thinking that males, because of superior muscle strength, must have been the movers and shakers of society. (My brief rephrasing)
Yes, but based on more recent archeological finds. It was also a nice review of what theories have existed in the past. I liked the emphasis on non-European societies. I am not quite finished and then more rethinking on my part. I did like that they gave women much more credit than they usually are given.
Thanks! That makes me more likely to read it.ЁЯШК