I didn't notice that one, but I did balk at the word "fight". A fight may prove unavoidable but if there's one constant complaint I have about media jargon in the United States, it is the gross overuse of terms that imply violence. Action has to be "aggressive", anything that needs doing must be handled "aggressively".
I didn't notice that one, but I did balk at the word "fight". A fight may prove unavoidable but if there's one constant complaint I have about media jargon in the United States, it is the gross overuse of terms that imply violence. Action has to be "aggressive", anything that needs doing must be handled "aggressively".
Haven't we all seen far too much of fools -- often the most brilliant fools with vast expertise, vaster IQs, limitless hubris -- rushing in where angels fear to tread?
That said, all initiatives in defense of democracy are, at the very least, worthy of our attention.
I didn't notice that one, but I did balk at the word "fight". A fight may prove unavoidable but if there's one constant complaint I have about media jargon in the United States, it is the gross overuse of terms that imply violence. Action has to be "aggressive", anything that needs doing must be handled "aggressively".
Haven't we all seen far too much of fools -- often the most brilliant fools with vast expertise, vaster IQs, limitless hubris -- rushing in where angels fear to tread?
That said, all initiatives in defense of democracy are, at the very least, worthy of our attention.