I get Dr. Sanchez's point but why only the NYT? In my imaginary world these letters should be mandatory reading, because they connect what we were and are as country to what is happening now. That is what the study of history is all about.
I get Dr. Sanchez's point but why only the NYT? In my imaginary world these letters should be mandatory reading, because they connect what we were and are as country to what is happening now. That is what the study of history is all about.
I get Dr. Sanchez's point but why only the NYT? In my imaginary world these letters should be mandatory reading, because they connect what we were and are as country to what is happening now. That is what the study of history is all about.