Actually Liz Cheney is far to the right of most seditionists. She has seized the moment to take a “moral” stand against overtly overturning democracy. She prefers to work quietly to undermine it. Beware of the lion in sheep’s clothes.
Actually Liz Cheney is far to the right of most seditionists. She has seized the moment to take a “moral” stand against overtly overturning democracy. She prefers to work quietly to undermine it. Beware of the lion in sheep’s clothes.
“'History is watching. Our children are watching. We must be brave enough to defend the basic principles that underpin and protect our freedom and our democratic process.'”
is a fantastic sound bite, but, I think it means something vastly different to me than it does to Liz Cheney.
Respectfully, THIS is my concern, that she’s rebranding herself as a righteous defender of democracy when history tells a different story.
Actually Liz Cheney is far to the right of most seditionists. She has seized the moment to take a “moral” stand against overtly overturning democracy. She prefers to work quietly to undermine it. Beware of the lion in sheep’s clothes.
What did I say above? She reverberates Reagan's Clarion call. And what does that mean?
The clarion call you quoted:
“'History is watching. Our children are watching. We must be brave enough to defend the basic principles that underpin and protect our freedom and our democratic process.'”
is a fantastic sound bite, but, I think it means something vastly different to me than it does to Liz Cheney.
Respectfully, THIS is my concern, that she’s rebranding herself as a righteous defender of democracy when history tells a different story.
No pi$$ing on Reagan's grave, please, til we're done dancing on it.